Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
I believe the next question is Hussam, Jan is there anything we can do to make libxml2 upgrade happen? Let me put this statement other way: I have some time that I would like to contribute it back to Linux Arch. Trying to resolve libxml2 upgrade issues seems a useful task. Could anyone provide me more information about libxml upgrade problems? Jan, you are the maintainer should know it. If it brakes apps then could you give me the list? I'll try to look at it. Anatol, Here is a source package building libxml2 2.9.1. It took less than 5 minutes to modify the official repo PKGBUILD and build the new version. I haven't tested all software depending on libxml2 but I have installed it myself and so far so good everything works perfectly for me. CONFIDENTIALITY : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
Anatol,
Here is a source package building libxml2 2.9.1. It took less than 5 minutes
to
modify the official repo PKGBUILD and build the new version.
I haven't tested all software depending on libxml2 but I have installed it
myself and so far so good everything works perfectly for me.
Something stripped out the bin attachement. Here is a diff:
--- /var/abs/extra/libxml2/PKGBUILD 2013-05-03 18:05:54.0 -0400
+++ PKGBUILD2013-05-07 14:16:46.141882166 -0400
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
# Contributor: John Proctor jproc...@prium.net
pkgname=libxml2
-pkgver=2.8.0
+pkgver=2.9.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=XML parsing library, version 2
arch=(i686 x86_64)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ options=('!libtool')
url=http://www.xmlsoft.org/;
source=(ftp://ftp.xmlsoft.org/${pkgname}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xmlts20080205.tar.gz)
-md5sums=('c62106f02ee00b6437f0fb9d370c1093'
+md5sums=('9c0cfef285d5c4a5c80d00904ddab380'
'b255be9a1c7f7021e52448e4ec8d7a0d')
build() {
CONFIDENTIALITY : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be
privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any
purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
On 05/02/2013 03:20 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: Hi On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb hus...@visp.net.lb wrote: On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications. I believe the next question is Hussam, Jan is there anything we can do to make libxml2 upgrade happen? Let me put this statement other way: I have some time that I would like to contribute it back to Linux Arch. Trying to resolve libxml2 upgrade issues seems a useful task. Could anyone provide me more information about libxml upgrade problems? Jan, you are the maintainer should know it. If it brakes apps then could you give me the list? I'll try to look at it. I would like to help there too. I wanted to email the maintainer about libxslt and cyrus-sasl packages and see how can I help to resolve the issues that prevent the packages from being upgraded. Count me in. FYI, I've already upgraded those packages on another distro and they appear to work flawlessly.
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
Hi On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb hus...@visp.net.lb wrote: On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications. I believe the next question is Hussam, Jan is there anything we can do to make libxml2 upgrade happen? Let me put this statement other way: I have some time that I would like to contribute it back to Linux Arch. Trying to resolve libxml2 upgrade issues seems a useful task. Could anyone provide me more information about libxml upgrade problems? Jan, you are the maintainer should know it. If it brakes apps then could you give me the list? I'll try to look at it.
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb hus...@visp.net.lb wrote: On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications. I believe the next question is Hussam, Jan is there anything we can do to make libxml2 upgrade happen?
[arch-general] libxml2 out of date
Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards -- Ross Lagerwall
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications.
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb hus...@visp.net.lb wrote: On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications. Do you have list of applications that are broken? Could it be fixed by recompiling those applications against 2.9.X? I see that upcoming ubuntu is using 2.9.0 http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=raringkeywords=libxml2 and I assume their applications work fine
Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:05:34PM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote: As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications. Do you have list of applications that are broken? Could it be fixed by recompiling those applications against 2.9.X? I see that upcoming ubuntu is using 2.9.0 http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=raringkeywords=libxml2 and I assume their applications work fine As does openSUSE 12.3: http://en.opensuse.org/Package_list and Fedora 18 and 19: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libxml2.git/ Regards -- Ross Lagerwall
