Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler

Aaron Griffin schrieb:

I think you're mistaken. Our modprobe doesn't have any message of the
sort, relating to Arch. The error you are seeing is due to a change in
the way modprobe parses config files. It used to read
/etc/modprobe.conf and/or /etc/modprobe.d/* - now it only reads
/etc/modprobe.d/*.conf

The message is modprobe telling you something is wrong with the config
files. Most likely you just have a .pacsav file in /etc/modprobe.d/


This is annoying, I thought it would simply ignore those files. Now it 
seems that it reads them, but prints that warning. Do you think we 
should patch it to at least ignore .pacsave files until they remove this 
warning and backward-compatibility?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Damien Churchill
2009/7/2 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org:
 Aaron Griffin schrieb:

 I think you're mistaken. Our modprobe doesn't have any message of the
 sort, relating to Arch. The error you are seeing is due to a change in
 the way modprobe parses config files. It used to read
 /etc/modprobe.conf and/or /etc/modprobe.d/* - now it only reads
 /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf

 The message is modprobe telling you something is wrong with the config
 files. Most likely you just have a .pacsav file in /etc/modprobe.d/

 This is annoying, I thought it would simply ignore those files. Now it seems
 that it reads them, but prints that warning. Do you think we should patch it
 to at least ignore .pacsave files until they remove this warning and
 backward-compatibility?



I've noticed an issue regarding mkinitcpio and the new modprobe changes that
requires a symlink from /etc/modprobe.conf to /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf
in order for options for any modules you load in the initramfs to be applied,
just incase this hasn't been reported yet.

Damien


Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler

Damien Churchill schrieb:

I've noticed an issue regarding mkinitcpio and the new modprobe changes that
requires a symlink from /etc/modprobe.conf to /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf
in order for options for any modules you load in the initramfs to be applied,
just incase this hasn't been reported yet.


/etc/modprobe.conf is not used in the real system or initramfs anymore. 
Your mkinitcpio configuration is simply wrong.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Damien Churchill
2009/7/2 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org:
 Damien Churchill schrieb:

 I've noticed an issue regarding mkinitcpio and the new modprobe changes
 that
 requires a symlink from /etc/modprobe.conf to
 /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf
 in order for options for any modules you load in the initramfs to be
 applied,
 just incase this hasn't been reported yet.

 /etc/modprobe.conf is not used in the real system or initramfs anymore. Your
 mkinitcpio configuration is simply wrong.



Touché, I blindly overlooked the FILES var. Apologies.


[arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-01 Thread Baho Utot
I am getting a message on boot that I need to change the modules line in
rc.conf to the new way which is to put the conf file into modprobe.d.

Is there any info on this?

I have some modules I want to blacklist and some to load.

Is the format the same as modprobe.conf? ( I presume )

I take it I can just add a file like this

net-pf-10.conf that contains

blacklist net-pf-10

Is that right ?







Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-01 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
 I am getting a message on boot that I need to change the modules line in
 rc.conf to the new way which is to put the conf file into modprobe.d.

 Is there any info on this?

 I have some modules I want to blacklist and some to load.

 Is the format the same as modprobe.conf? ( I presume )

 I take it I can just add a file like this

 net-pf-10.conf that contains

 blacklist net-pf-10

I think you're mistaken. Our modprobe doesn't have any message of the
sort, relating to Arch. The error you are seeing is due to a change in
the way modprobe parses config files. It used to read
/etc/modprobe.conf and/or /etc/modprobe.d/* - now it only reads
/etc/modprobe.d/*.conf

The message is modprobe telling you something is wrong with the config
files. Most likely you just have a .pacsav file in /etc/modprobe.d/


Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-01 Thread Baho Utot
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 19:05 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
  I am getting a message on boot that I need to change the modules line in
  rc.conf to the new way which is to put the conf file into modprobe.d.
 
  Is there any info on this?
 
  I have some modules I want to blacklist and some to load.
 
  Is the format the same as modprobe.conf? ( I presume )
 
  I take it I can just add a file like this
 
  net-pf-10.conf that contains
 
  blacklist net-pf-10
 
 I think you're mistaken. Our modprobe doesn't have any message of the
 sort, relating to Arch. The error you are seeing is due to a change in
 the way modprobe parses config files. It used to read
 /etc/modprobe.conf and/or /etc/modprobe.d/* - now it only reads
 /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf
 
 The message is modprobe telling you something is wrong with the config
 files. Most likely you just have a .pacsav file in /etc/modprobe.d/

Yes I do have a .pacsav file in /etc/modprobe.conf

Any way I tried adding the filename.conf to modules I wanted blacklisted
or installed and it worked as well.