Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
> >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 01:24:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> > On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis >>> wrote: >>> >> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: >>> >> > > Hi all, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: >>> >> > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This >>> is >>> >> part of the /usr move >>> >> > >>> >> > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by >>> one >>> >> of those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these >>> filelists. I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in >>> testing but totally forgot to. >>> >> >>> >> $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla >>> >> jre /opt/mozilla/ >>> >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ >>> >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ >>> >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so >>> >> >>> >> Has anybody noticed this? >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > Apparently you have. ;) I don't know if any devs have tho - file >>> a >>> bugreport. >>> >>> There is also some "lint(ing)" in the /opt/mozilla hierarchy you >>> might want to mention in your bug report. >> >> Could you post an example? > > Uh, sure thing !:12 09:24 pkgconfig > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 plugins > > The pkgconfig was probably NOT > > ls -al /opt/mozilla/lib/ > total 16 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 .. > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-12-12 09:24 pkgconfig > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 plugins > > The pkgconfig might NOT have been created by mozilla et al BUT if > mozilla is removed from /opt for /usr , well this remains nonetheless. > > Good question by the way. > > > Very best regards; > > Bob Finch > UG... !! How did that weirdo cut and paste happen ? Um, here it is again, hopefully properly formatted; ls -al /opt/mozilla/lib/ total 16 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-12-12 09:24 pkgconfig drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 plugins -Bob Finch
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 01:24:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: >> >> > > Hi all, >> >> > > >> >> > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: >> >> > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This >> is >> >> part of the /usr move >> >> > >> >> > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by >> one >> >> of those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these >> >> filelists. I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in >> testing but totally forgot to. >> >> >> >> $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla >> >> jre /opt/mozilla/ >> >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ >> >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ >> >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so >> >> >> >> Has anybody noticed this? >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apparently you have. ;) I don't know if any devs have tho - file a >> bugreport. >> >> There is also some "lint(ing)" in the /opt/mozilla hierarchy you might >> want to mention in your bug report. > > Could you post an example? Uh, sure thing !:12 09:24 pkgconfig drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 plugins The pkgconfig was probably NOT ls -al /opt/mozilla/lib/ total 16 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-12-12 09:24 pkgconfig drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2008-02-07 21:25 plugins The pkgconfig might NOT have been created by mozilla et al BUT if mozilla is removed from /opt for /usr , well this remains nonetheless. Good question by the way. Very best regards; Bob Finch Liviu Librescu - În veci pomenirea lui. (May his memory be eternal.)
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:20:31AM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > > > of the /usr move > > > > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > > > forgot to. > > > > $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla > > jre /opt/mozilla/ > > jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ > > jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ > > jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so > > > > Has anybody noticed this? > > > > > > Apparently you have. ;) I don't know if any devs have tho - file a > bugreport. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9498
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 01:24:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > >> > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is > >> part of the /usr move > >> > > >> > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one > >> of those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these > >> filelists. I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in > >> testing but totally forgot to. > >> > >> $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla > >> jre /opt/mozilla/ > >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ > >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ > >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so > >> > >> Has anybody noticed this? > >> > >> > > > > Apparently you have. ;) I don't know if any devs have tho - file a > > bugreport. > > There is also some "lint(ing)" in the /opt/mozilla hierarchy you might > want to mention in your bug report. Could you post an example?
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
> On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: >> > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is >> part of the /usr move >> > >> > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one >> of those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these >> filelists. I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in >> testing but totally forgot to. >> >> $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla >> jre /opt/mozilla/ >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ >> jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so >> >> Has anybody noticed this? >> >> > > Apparently you have. ;) I don't know if any devs have tho - file a > bugreport. There is also some "lint(ing)" in the /opt/mozilla hierarchy you might want to mention in your bug report. Very best regards; Bob Finch Liviu Librescu - În veci pomenirea lui. (May his memory be eternal.)
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Feb 7, 2008 6:40 PM, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > > of the /usr move > > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > > forgot to. > > $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla > jre /opt/mozilla/ > jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ > jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ > jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so > > Has anybody noticed this? > > Apparently you have. ;) I don't know if any devs have tho - file a bugreport.
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > of the /usr move > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > forgot to. $ sudo pacman -Ql jre | grep /opt/mozilla jre /opt/mozilla/ jre /opt/mozilla/lib/ jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/ jre /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so Has anybody noticed this?
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:36:55PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > > > > of the /usr move > > > > > > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > > > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > > > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > > > > forgot to. > > > > > > Is it just the empty dir - ie no files inside? It may be inefficient, > > > but pacman -Ql | grep /opt/mozilla/lib will see if any packages create > > > it (since I don't think you can do -Qo on a dir) > > > > > > > It was just the directory otherwise it would be easy to find out with > > -Qo. Its been like 10 days i have removed the directory and the path > > may be a bit deifferent, not sure 100%. And by the way it was a fresh > > install on my reborn 2nd Archlinux installation. I have firefox & > > flashplugin only installed so its probably one of them creating it later > > for some reason when run. > > People updating now, and not only, should be able to verify this. > > > > Greg > > Looks like the mozilla-common package. It still keeps the legacy dirs > around just in case some old packages need it. > Ah, right. thanks for pointing this out.
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > > > of the /usr move > > > > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > > > forgot to. > > > > Is it just the empty dir - ie no files inside? It may be inefficient, > > but pacman -Ql | grep /opt/mozilla/lib will see if any packages create > > it (since I don't think you can do -Qo on a dir) > > > > It was just the directory otherwise it would be easy to find out with > -Qo. Its been like 10 days i have removed the directory and the path > may be a bit deifferent, not sure 100%. And by the way it was a fresh > install on my reborn 2nd Archlinux installation. I have firefox & > flashplugin only installed so its probably one of them creating it later > for some reason when run. > People updating now, and not only, should be able to verify this. > > Greg Looks like the mozilla-common package. It still keeps the legacy dirs around just in case some old packages need it.
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > > of the /usr move > > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > > forgot to. > > Is it just the empty dir - ie no files inside? It may be inefficient, > but pacman -Ql | grep /opt/mozilla/lib will see if any packages create > it (since I don't think you can do -Qo on a dir) > It was just the directory otherwise it would be easy to find out with -Qo. Its been like 10 days i have removed the directory and the path may be a bit deifferent, not sure 100%. And by the way it was a fresh install on my reborn 2nd Archlinux installation. I have firefox & flashplugin only installed so its probably one of them creating it later for some reason when run. People updating now, and not only, should be able to verify this. Greg
Re: [arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > of the /usr move > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > forgot to. Is it just the empty dir - ie no files inside? It may be inefficient, but pacman -Ql | grep /opt/mozilla/lib will see if any packages create it (since I don't think you can do -Qo on a dir)
[arch-general] mozilla /usr move
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > Hi all, > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > of the /usr move Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally forgot to. Greg
