Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
2012/7/25 Ike Devolder : >> That is an option I have not yet tried but I just want to preserve the >> reproduction and debug the problem if there is any. Maybe this will help: cd /var/lib/pacman/pkg for pkg in *; do bsdtar -tf $pkg > /dev/null || echo "$pkg is broken"; done This is strange, for me, pacman always showed which package is broken (and asked to delete it). Can you disable any ftp mirrors from your mirrorlist ([1])? Could you post your pacman.conf? [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1050214#p1050214 -- Krzysztof Warzecha
Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
Op woensdag 25 juli 2012 10:30:21 schreef Shridhar Daithankar: > On Tuesday 24 Jul 2012 11:58:14 PM Jeremiah Dodds wrote: > > Oon-Ee Ng writes: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds > > > > > >> Does it continue after a "pacman -Scc"? > > > > > > Why are you recommending clearing his entire cache (which can be quite > > > useful) when he's already specifically cleared the offending package > > > and still has problems? > > > > I've run into situations where I thought I had cleared a corrupted > > package but didn't actually do so, or where I missed one. Considering > > he's tried multiple times, it might be worth clearing the entire thing > > to make sure he's not missing something. > > That is an option I have not yet tried but I just want to preserve the > reproduction and debug the problem if there is any. > > > -- > Regards > Shridhar You could try to switch mirrors, use a mirror that is not dropping all the time, or is this problem related to your own internet ? My guess is we will see more of this in the future since the package checking is much more tight now than in the past. --Ike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
On Tuesday 24 Jul 2012 11:58:14 PM Jeremiah Dodds wrote: > Oon-Ee Ng writes: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds > >> Does it continue after a "pacman -Scc"? > > > > Why are you recommending clearing his entire cache (which can be quite > > useful) when he's already specifically cleared the offending package > > and still has problems? > > I've run into situations where I thought I had cleared a corrupted > package but didn't actually do so, or where I missed one. Considering > he's tried multiple times, it might be worth clearing the entire thing > to make sure he's not missing something. That is an option I have not yet tried but I just want to preserve the reproduction and debug the problem if there is any. -- Regards Shridhar
Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
Oon-Ee Ng writes: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds > wrote: >> Shridhar Daithankar writes: >> >>> I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any >>> timeouts >>> and it still failed the upgrade with same error for the same package. >>> >>> So I uninstalled ati-dri and xf86-video-ati. I have intel card and got all >>> those extra drivers because I installed the whole group for simplicity. >>> >>> Try again and this time it failed for gcc-libs. Delete, redownload and the >>> error still persists. >>> >>> and I don't think uninstalling gcc-libs is an option. >>> >>> I also found https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28014 but I don't think that >>> can >>> solely fix the issue. --debug is printing enough information or so I would >>> like to think. >>> >>> Pl. Help. >> >> Does it continue after a "pacman -Scc"? >> > Why are you recommending clearing his entire cache (which can be quite > useful) when he's already specifically cleared the offending package > and still has problems? I've run into situations where I thought I had cleared a corrupted package but didn't actually do so, or where I missed one. Considering he's tried multiple times, it might be worth clearing the entire thing to make sure he's not missing something. - Jeremiah Dodds github: https://github.com/jdodds irc : exhortatory -
Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremiah Dodds wrote: > Shridhar Daithankar writes: > >> I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any >> timeouts >> and it still failed the upgrade with same error for the same package. >> >> So I uninstalled ati-dri and xf86-video-ati. I have intel card and got all >> those extra drivers because I installed the whole group for simplicity. >> >> Try again and this time it failed for gcc-libs. Delete, redownload and the >> error still persists. >> >> and I don't think uninstalling gcc-libs is an option. >> >> I also found https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28014 but I don't think that can >> solely fix the issue. --debug is printing enough information or so I would >> like to think. >> >> Pl. Help. > > Does it continue after a "pacman -Scc"? > Why are you recommending clearing his entire cache (which can be quite useful) when he's already specifically cleared the offending package and still has problems?
Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
Shridhar Daithankar writes: > I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any > timeouts > and it still failed the upgrade with same error for the same package. > > So I uninstalled ati-dri and xf86-video-ati. I have intel card and got all > those extra drivers because I installed the whole group for simplicity. > > Try again and this time it failed for gcc-libs. Delete, redownload and the > error still persists. > > and I don't think uninstalling gcc-libs is an option. > > I also found https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28014 but I don't think that can > solely fix the issue. --debug is printing enough information or so I would > like to think. > > Pl. Help. Does it continue after a "pacman -Scc"? - Jeremiah Dodds github: https://github.com/jdodds irc : exhortatory -
Re: [arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
Followup, On Wednesday 25 Jul 2012 9:03:42 AM Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > With pacman -sy --debug I get following error snippet > > - > debug: found cached pkg: /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ati-dri-8.0.4-2- > x86_64.pkg.tar.xz > debug: sig data: > iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQC9QHAAoJEJRlerIPKgkrd/EH/jhoIY6szxkh3AFGHogBLGe33tIcGhMchGI9 > jtxEht/Df+IB9X9tYC5nG62pOL9+v0Sl4yVLBW4Ni0mYdwQ0UfJr3Mt1s7C3LbTI1ucU8WZMZicX > c8tDKurRnPBDkAqnhK4+H7 > 4qa6ALNfIDQK7PVQTIedAQDgO9WsPd3DsKcOfNbEXZrDZSBU3awoaQuezKaoif/JnSt7iRXn3hd > 8piuUgQuLQuksAe+Oa6MtEgXoCHQ22uzXa6nEV1EkO0q1sf8+0w/9+4mD3ejUutfLAQbxqmpfmw3 > kEuQ1eaICRLRgRu0ugKuwqi9cvdDBiw/27Z1QTkY aUNtvdT66Wb5OuAJGI= > debug: checking signature for /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ati-dri-8.0.4-2- > x86_64.pkg.tar.xz > debug: 1 signatures returned > debug: fingerprint: ADC8A1FCC15E01D45310419E94657AB20F2A092B > debug: summary: valid > debug: summary: green > debug: status: Success > debug: timestamp: 1342952455 > debug: exp_timestamp: 0 > debug: validity: full; reason: Success > debug: key: ADC8A1FCC15E01D45310419E94657AB20F2A092B, Andreas Radke > , owner_trust unknown, disabled 0 > debug: signature is valid > debug: signature is fully trusted > debug: returning error 6 from _alpm_pkg_validate_internal : wrong or NULL > argument passed > - I deleted ati-dri package and redownloaded it. This time, without any timeouts and it still failed the upgrade with same error for the same package. So I uninstalled ati-dri and xf86-video-ati. I have intel card and got all those extra drivers because I installed the whole group for simplicity. Try again and this time it failed for gcc-libs. Delete, redownload and the error still persists. and I don't think uninstalling gcc-libs is an option. I also found https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28014 but I don't think that can solely fix the issue. --debug is printing enough information or so I would like to think. Pl. Help. -- Regards Shridhar
[arch-general] pacman and corrupt packages
Hello All, Last few days my net connection drops randomly or slows down to a crawl. As a result, there are several timeouts during package downloads. When a download timeout occurs, pacman aborts with "invalid or corrupted package". Is it possible to detect which package is corrupt and invalid, so that it can be downloaded? When it happened with one package, I deleted it manually and next time it worked but when several packages get timeout, its hard to detect the failing one. Does pacman has built-in retry functionality? Here is the complete log. - :: Starting full system upgrade... resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (33): ati-dri-8.0.4-2 boost-libs-1.50.0-2 clang-3.1-3 cups-1.5.3-6 cups-filters-1.0.20-1 dbus-1.6.4-1 dbus-core-1.6.4-1 dovecot-2.1.8-2 gcc-4.7.1-5 gcc-libs-4.7.1-5 git-1.7.11.3-1 gnutls-3.0.21-2 icu-49.1.2-2 imagemagick-6.7.8.6-1 intel-dri-8.0.4-2 khrplatform-devel-8.0.4-2 libcups-1.5.3-6 libegl-8.0.4-2 libgl-8.0.4-2 libglapi-8.0.4-2 libgles-8.0.4-2 libmp4v2-2.0.0-2 llvm-3.1-3 mesa-8.0.4-2 nginx-1.2.2-2 python2-distribute-0.6.28-1 qt-4.8.2-3 qt- gstreamer-0.10.2-2 svga-dri-8.0.4-2 taglib-1.7.2-2 ttf-liberation-2.00.0-1 tzdata-2012d-1 xf86- video-intel-2.20.1-1 Total Installed Size: 515.40 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 1.88 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y (33/33) checking package integrity [#] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package) Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. - With pacman -sy --debug I get following error snippet - debug: found cached pkg: /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ati-dri-8.0.4-2- x86_64.pkg.tar.xz debug: sig data: iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQC9QHAAoJEJRlerIPKgkrd/EH/jhoIY6szxkh3AFGHogBLGe33tIcGhMchGI9jtxEht/Df+IB9X9tYC5nG62pOL9+v0Sl4yVLBW4Ni0mYdwQ0UfJr3Mt1s7C3LbTI1ucU8WZMZicXc8tDKurRnPBDkAqnhK4+H7 4qa6ALNfIDQK7PVQTIedAQDgO9WsPd3DsKcOfNbEXZrDZSBU3awoaQuezKaoif/JnSt7iRXn3hd8piuUgQuLQuksAe+Oa6MtEgXoCHQ22uzXa6nEV1EkO0q1sf8+0w/9+4mD3ejUutfLAQbxqmpfmw3kEuQ1eaICRLRgRu0ugKuwqi9cvdDBiw/27Z1QTkY aUNtvdT66Wb5OuAJGI= debug: checking signature for /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ati-dri-8.0.4-2- x86_64.pkg.tar.xz debug: 1 signatures returned debug: fingerprint: ADC8A1FCC15E01D45310419E94657AB20F2A092B debug: summary: valid debug: summary: green debug: status: Success debug: timestamp: 1342952455 debug: exp_timestamp: 0 debug: validity: full; reason: Success debug: key: ADC8A1FCC15E01D45310419E94657AB20F2A092B, Andreas Radke , owner_trust unknown, disabled 0 debug: signature is valid debug: signature is fully trusted debug: returning error 6 from _alpm_pkg_validate_internal : wrong or NULL argument passed - -- Regards Shridhar
