Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-09 Thread Peter Lewis
On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 19:12:57 Sander Jansen wrote:
 resolving dependencies...
 looking for inter-conflicts...
 error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
 
 :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
 :: valgrind: requires glibc2.15
 
 Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?

Probably either wait a bit or else try a different mirror. Sounds like the 
mirror got out of sync.

HTH,

Pete.


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-09 Thread Sander Jansen
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
 On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 19:12:57 Sander Jansen wrote:
 resolving dependencies...
 looking for inter-conflicts...
 error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)

 :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
 :: valgrind: requires glibc2.15

 Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?

 Probably either wait a bit or else try a different mirror. Sounds like the
 mirror got out of sync.


Or perhaps my lack of updating in recent weeks made things out of
whack. Just updating all packages including pacman at the same time
seems to do the trick.

Sander


[arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Sander Jansen
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 testing   29.7 KiB   238K/s 00:00 [##] 100%
 core 102.1 KiB   296K/s 00:00 [##] 100%
 extra   1170.6 KiB   816K/s 00:01 [##] 100%
 community-testing 11.1 KiB   244K/s 00:00 [##] 100%
 community999.7 KiB   673K/s 00:01 [##] 100%
 multilib-testing1574.0   B  71.5M/s 00:00 [##] 100%
 multilib  67.8 KiB   339K/s 00:00 [##] 100%
:: The following packages should be upgraded first :
pacman
:: Do you want to cancel the current operation
:: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] y

resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
:: valgrind: requires glibc2.15

Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?

Thanks,

Sander


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Qadri

 resolving dependencies...
 looking for inter-conflicts...
 error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
 :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
 :: valgrind: requires glibc2.15

 Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?

 Thanks,

 Sander


If you're okay with updating those two packages after you update pacman,
(and you're not planning on running gcc or valgrind in between), then
ignore the dependency check. Alternatively, don't update pacman first -
though not knowing what version of pacman you're using, it's hard to say
whether or not it'll be critical.

MAQ.


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Matthew Monaco

On 01/08/2012 06:12 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:

:: Synchronizing package databases...
  testing   29.7 KiB   238K/s 00:00 [##] 
100%
  core 102.1 KiB   296K/s 00:00 [##] 
100%
  extra   1170.6 KiB   816K/s 00:01 [##] 
100%
  community-testing 11.1 KiB   244K/s 00:00 [##] 
100%
  community999.7 KiB   673K/s 00:01 [##] 
100%
  multilib-testing1574.0   B  71.5M/s 00:00 [##] 
100%
  multilib  67.8 KiB   339K/s 00:00 [##] 
100%
:: The following packages should be upgraded first :
 pacman
:: Do you want to cancel the current operation
:: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] y

resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
:: valgrind: requires glibc2.15

Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?

Thanks,

Sander


I occasionally get dependency errors when there is a pacman upgrade. I've gotten 
around it every single time by explicitly update pacman (pacman -S pacman), 
followed by my normal upgrade (pacman -Su)


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@0x01b.net wrote:
 I occasionally get dependency errors when there is a pacman upgrade. I've
 gotten around it every single time by explicitly update pacman (pacman -S
 pacman), followed by my normal upgrade (pacman -Su)

Do you have 'SyncFirst   = pacman' in your pacman.conf?


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Sander Jansen
On Jan 8, 2012 8:35 PM, Qadri muhammad.a.qa...@gmail.com wrote:

 
  resolving dependencies...
  looking for inter-conflicts...
  error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
  :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
  :: valgrind: requires glibc2.15
 
  Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Sander
 

 If you're okay with updating those two packages after you update pacman,
 (and you're not planning on running gcc or valgrind in between), then
 ignore the dependency check. Alternatively, don't update pacman first -
 though not knowing what version of pacman you're using, it's hard to say
 whether or not it'll be critical.

 MAQ.

Current pacman is 4.0.1-1.

Sander


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Gergely Imreh
On 9 January 2012 12:24, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Jan 8, 2012 8:35 PM, Qadri muhammad.a.qa...@gmail.com wrote:

 
  resolving dependencies...
  looking for inter-conflicts...
  error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
  :: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.6.2-1
  :: valgrind: requires glibc2.15
 
  Any suggestions on how to fix this conflict?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Sander
 

 If you're okay with updating those two packages after you update pacman,
 (and you're not planning on running gcc or valgrind in between), then
 ignore the dependency check. Alternatively, don't update pacman first -
 though not knowing what version of pacman you're using, it's hard to say
 whether or not it'll be critical.

 MAQ.

 Current pacman is 4.0.1-1.

Is it really? I think the 4.0.1 is only in testing, normal updates are
at 3.5.4-4...


Re: [arch-general] pacman update conflict

2012-01-08 Thread Matthew Monaco

On 01/08/2012 08:55 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Matthew Monacodgbale...@0x01b.net  wrote:

I occasionally get dependency errors when there is a pacman upgrade. I've
gotten around it every single time by explicitly update pacman (pacman -S
pacman), followed by my normal upgrade (pacman -Su)


Do you have 'SyncFirst   = pacman' in your pacman.conf?


yes