[arch-general] perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
I'm just a bit curious on this, why release a -3 when upstream released a new ABI compatible (as far as I know) release over a month ago, that isn't yet in repo. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
Re: [arch-general] perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
On 11/02/2010 03:05 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: I'm just a bit curious on this, why release a -3 when upstream released a new ABI compatible (as far as I know) release over a month ago, that isn't yet in repo. lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/ upgpkg: perl 5.12.1-3 db-5.1 rebuild -- Ionuț
Re: [arch-general] perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/ that explains a version bump, not why perl wasn't upgraded at the same time, if you've gotta rebuild perl might as well make it current. it's not like this is 5.14 and it'll break everything again. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com
Re: [arch-general] perl 5.12.1-3? not 5.12.2-1?
On 02/11/10 23:18, Caleb Cushing wrote: On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: lets see. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/perl/trunk/ that explains a version bump, not why perl wasn't upgraded at the same time, if you've gotta rebuild perl might as well make it current. it's not like this is 5.14 and it'll break everything again. I do not maintain perl so I was doing nothing more than a simple rebuild. Updating a package when you know nothing about it is usually not a good idea... Allan
