Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Dennis Herbrich wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 13.06.2012 21:57, schrieb Chris Sakalis: >> > Hello, >> > not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds, >> > but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled >> > libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually >> > tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for >> > the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6, >> > for the moment. >> >> Yes, let's keep openjdk6 for minecraft :) > > Not necessary. Runs like a charm with 7, you just need to add an explicit > library path. See the AUR comments for the package. :) > > Bye, > Dennis > > -- > "Den Rechtsstaat macht aus, dass Unschuldige wieder frei kommen." > Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesinnenminister (14.10.08, TAZ-Interview) > > 0D21BE6C - F3DC D064 BB88 5162 56BE 730F 5471 3881 0D21 BE6C LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/ works for me too, thanks. I guess jre6 is not needed for minecraft after all. --Chris Sakalis
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:50:24AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 13.06.2012 21:57, schrieb Chris Sakalis: > > Hello, > > not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds, > > but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled > > libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually > > tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for > > the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6, > > for the moment. > > Yes, let's keep openjdk6 for minecraft :) Not necessary. Runs like a charm with 7, you just need to add an explicit library path. See the AUR comments for the package. :) Bye, Dennis -- "Den Rechtsstaat macht aus, dass Unschuldige wieder frei kommen." Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesinnenminister (14.10.08, TAZ-Interview) 0D21BE6C - F3DC D064 BB88 5162 56BE 730F 5471 3881 0D21 BE6C
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
Am 13.06.2012 21:57, schrieb Chris Sakalis: > Hello, > not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds, > but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled > libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually > tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for > the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6, > for the moment. Yes, let's keep openjdk6 for minecraft :) Andy, is it problematic or difficult to keep maintaining openjdk6 for a while? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On 13-06-2012 19:08, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
On 13-06-2012 18:43, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
On 13 June 2012 22:02, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Sakalis
wrote:
Hello,
not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds,
but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled
libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually
tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for
the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6,
for the moment.
--Chris Sakalis
[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39434
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ray Kohler
wrote:
On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote:
Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it
Upstream only yesterday fixed a bug which affects me
(http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea-web?cmd=changeset;node=40776f2e940f).
So I'd be grateful if you would wait until that commit comes down to
our icedtea-web-java7 package before dropping icedtea-web.
I think we should move forward to 7. Oracle already announced that
they are moving so the the application must follow. You can always
keep a JRE 6 and JDK 6 locally as optional somewhere else (/opt) or
even at your home folder for your development and for applications and
make alias for them or even load them in your local .profile.
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include
int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}
Hello,
Unfortunately tomcat7 won't compile with OpenJDK7. I will have a look
at this (after my holidays next week). This one should be the only of
mine to still require java-environment=6.
--
Guillaume
Hi,
Many internet banking applications here in Brazil need JDK6.
I'll check if this is still valid for my bank (that's a very popular
one), but others may cease to work.
Armando
Hum ...
It seems the R&D people at my bank have updated the internet banking
application and now it works with SDK7.
Anyway I don't know about other applications like this, here in Brazil
and elsewhere...
Armando
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On 13-06-2012 18:43, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
On 13 June 2012 22:02, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Sakalis wrote:
Hello,
not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds,
but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled
libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually
tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for
the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6,
for the moment.
--Chris Sakalis
[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39434
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote:
Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it
Upstream only yesterday fixed a bug which affects me
(http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea-web?cmd=changeset;node=40776f2e940f).
So I'd be grateful if you would wait until that commit comes down to
our icedtea-web-java7 package before dropping icedtea-web.
I think we should move forward to 7. Oracle already announced that
they are moving so the the application must follow. You can always
keep a JRE 6 and JDK 6 locally as optional somewhere else (/opt) or
even at your home folder for your development and for applications and
make alias for them or even load them in your local .profile.
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include
int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}
Hello,
Unfortunately tomcat7 won't compile with OpenJDK7. I will have a look
at this (after my holidays next week). This one should be the only of
mine to still require java-environment=6.
--
Guillaume
Hi,
Many internet banking applications here in Brazil need JDK6.
I'll check if this is still valid for my bank (that's a very popular
one), but others may cease to work.
Armando
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On 13 June 2012 22:02, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Sakalis wrote:
>> Hello,
>> not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds,
>> but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled
>> libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually
>> tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for
>> the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6,
>> for the moment.
>>
>> --Chris Sakalis
>>
>> [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39434
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
>>> On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote:
Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it
>>>
>>> Upstream only yesterday fixed a bug which affects me
>>> (http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea-web?cmd=changeset;node=40776f2e940f).
>>> So I'd be grateful if you would wait until that commit comes down to
>>> our icedtea-web-java7 package before dropping icedtea-web.
>
>
> I think we should move forward to 7. Oracle already announced that
> they are moving so the the application must follow. You can always
> keep a JRE 6 and JDK 6 locally as optional somewhere else (/opt) or
> even at your home folder for your development and for applications and
> make alias for them or even load them in your local .profile.
>
> --
> Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
>
> #include
> int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}
Hello,
Unfortunately tomcat7 won't compile with OpenJDK7. I will have a look
at this (after my holidays next week). This one should be the only of
mine to still require java-environment=6.
--
Guillaume
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Sakalis wrote:
> Hello,
> not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds,
> but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled
> libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually
> tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for
> the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6,
> for the moment.
>
> --Chris Sakalis
>
> [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39434
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
>> On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote:
>>> Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it
>>
>> Upstream only yesterday fixed a bug which affects me
>> (http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea-web?cmd=changeset;node=40776f2e940f).
>> So I'd be grateful if you would wait until that commit comes down to
>> our icedtea-web-java7 package before dropping icedtea-web.
I think we should move forward to 7. Oracle already announced that
they are moving so the the application must follow. You can always
keep a JRE 6 and JDK 6 locally as optional somewhere else (/opt) or
even at your home folder for your development and for applications and
make alias for them or even load them in your local .profile.
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include
int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
Hello, not a very important application, and there may be some workarounds, but with openjdk7 Minecraft [1] fails to load the correct bundled libraries on 64bit. From the exception, it appears that it actually tries to load the 32bit libs, but it fails. Again, this is only for the bundled lwjgl libraries. Just a small point for keeping openjdk6, for the moment. --Chris Sakalis [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39434 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ray Kohler wrote: > On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote: >> Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it > > Upstream only yesterday fixed a bug which affects me > (http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea-web?cmd=changeset;node=40776f2e940f). > So I'd be grateful if you would wait until that commit comes down to > our icedtea-web-java7 package before dropping icedtea-web.
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote: > Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it Upstream only yesterday fixed a bug which affects me (http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea-web?cmd=changeset;node=40776f2e940f). So I'd be grateful if you would wait until that commit comes down to our icedtea-web-java7 package before dropping icedtea-web.
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] time to drop openjdk6 ?
On 13.06.2012 21:32, Andreas Radke wrote: > Oracle has declared JRE/JDK7 the preferred one over JRE/JDK6. So it At least one of my packages can be built only with openjdk6. I did not research why. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
