Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-12 Thread Don deJuan

On 04/11/2012 03:55 PM, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana wrote:

I installed Linux 3.3.1 yesterday, wifi authentication over protected
networks is definitely broken for ath9k.
I can connect to open networks, but if I try to connect to a WPA/WPA2 net
(didn't try with WEP), after this I can't connect to ANY net (open too).

ath9k is totally blown up, I hope next release will see a fix.

Il giorno 11 aprile 2012 23:08, mike cloakedmike.cloa...@gmail.com  ha
scritto:


On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
ulpianoso...@gmail.com  wrote:


I believe it will be fixed in the next release...


you mean 3.3.2 or 3.4 ?


I saw a post that 3.4 will have a fix.

--
mike c



I am having kswapd issues with this kernel, when ever I start a VM and 
there is high IO I get kernel panics. This is new for me and has not 
happened on any of the earlier kernels. I am seeing nothing else other 
than this. It seems to be saying low memory but my machine has yet to 
get over 4.5GB and the system has 8GB. I know it is not out of memory 
and I have tested my memory and nothing comes back as being bad. Not 
really sure what else I could check on for this. The error I posted is 
only the first trace in dmesg. I can post the full output to a paste 
site if it would help seeing all the call traces. Any suggestions, info 
would be great, I always hate downgrading things, but I did verify that 
going to the old 3.2 kernel gets rid of this for me.


[ 7162.093883] swapper/6: page allocation failure: order:2, mode:0x4020
[ 7162.093890] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/6 Tainted: P   O 
3.3.1-1-ARCH #1

[ 7162.093894] Call Trace:
[ 7162.093896]  IRQ  [81110e76] warn_alloc_failed+0xf6/0x150
[ 7162.093913]  [8111ec95] ? wakeup_kswapd+0xd5/0x190
[ 7162.094028]  [a040187f] ? _nv017713rm+0x43/0xf3 [nvidia]
[ 7162.094036]  [81114682] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x6a2/0x8a0
[ 7162.094130]  [a0401605] ? _nv017712rm+0x34/0x26b [nvidia]
[ 7162.094218]  [a040187f] ? _nv017713rm+0x43/0xf3 [nvidia]
[ 7162.094226]  [8124464d] ? rb_insert_color+0xad/0x150
[ 7162.094234]  [81076ff9] ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x39/0xf0
[ 7162.094242]  [81089362] ? update_curr+0x212/0x220
[ 7162.094249]  [8145a5f9] kmalloc_large_node+0x57/0x85
[ 7162.094257]  [8115b271] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x191/0x230
[ 7162.094263]  [81087974] ? __enqueue_entity+0x74/0x80
[ 7162.094269]  [8108a57a] ? enqueue_entity+0xea/0x5b0
[ 7162.094275]  [8135990b] ? __alloc_skb+0x4b/0x230
[ 7162.094281]  [81359b0d] ? dev_alloc_skb+0x1d/0x40
[ 7162.094287]  [81359938] __alloc_skb+0x78/0x230
[ 7162.094293]  [81359b0d] dev_alloc_skb+0x1d/0x40
[ 7162.094301]  [a0341014] _rtl_pci_rx_interrupt+0x1d4/0x660 
[rtlwifi]

[ 7162.094308]  [81461d98] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x50
[ 7162.094329]  [a0073b50] ? ehci_irq+0x220/0x270 [ehci_hcd]
[ 7162.094336]  [a0341735] _rtl_pci_interrupt+0x295/0x930 
[rtlwifi]

[ 7162.094343]  [810d0345] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x75/0x2a0
[ 7162.094349]  [810d05b8] handle_irq_event+0x48/0x70
[ 7162.094355]  [810d350a] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x5a/0x100
[ 7162.094362]  [810178f2] handle_irq+0x22/0x40
[ 7162.094368]  [81464a3a] do_IRQ+0x5a/0xe0
[ 7162.094373]  [8146236e] common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e
[ 7162.094376]  EOI  [81297596] ? intel_idle+0xe6/0x150
[ 7162.094386]  [81297578] ? intel_idle+0xc8/0x150
[ 7162.094393]  [8133aa31] cpuidle_idle_call+0xc1/0x350
[ 7162.094399]  [8101423a] cpu_idle+0xda/0x130
[ 7162.094406]  [8145096b] start_secondary+0x223/0x22a
[ 7162.094410] Mem-Info:
[ 7162.094414] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
[ 7162.094418] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094421] CPU1: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094424] CPU2: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094427] CPU3: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094430] CPU4: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094433] CPU5: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094436] CPU6: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094439] CPU7: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[ 7162.094442] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
[ 7162.094445] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  91
[ 7162.094448] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 125
[ 7162.094451] CPU2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  80
[ 7162.094454] CPU3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  77
[ 7162.094457] CPU4: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  34
[ 7162.094460] CPU5: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 102
[ 7162.094463] CPU6: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 177
[ 7162.094466] CPU7: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  36
[ 7162.094468] Node 0 Normal per-cpu:
[ 7162.094472] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 166
[ 7162.094475] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 181
[ 7162.094479] CPU2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 136
[ 7162.094482] CPU3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 181
[ 7162.094485] CPU4: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 140
[ 7162.094488] 

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-11 Thread Sébastien le Preste de Vauban

El 10/04/12 13:04, mike cloaked escribió:

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
ulpianoso...@gmail.com  wrote:

Since last kernel upgrade, 3.3.1-1-ARCH I am having some trouble with ath5k,
like random disconnects only a reboot allows me to reconnect to the AP.
Now I downgraded to 3.2.14-1 and wifi is working fine.

This is a well known problem and reported a number of times already -
I believe it will be fixed in the next release...


you mean 3.3.2 or 3.4 ?


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-11 Thread mike cloaked
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
ulpianoso...@gmail.com wrote:

 I believe it will be fixed in the next release...

 you mean 3.3.2 or 3.4 ?

I saw a post that 3.4 will have a fix.

-- 
mike c


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-11 Thread Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana
I installed Linux 3.3.1 yesterday, wifi authentication over protected
networks is definitely broken for ath9k.
I can connect to open networks, but if I try to connect to a WPA/WPA2 net
(didn't try with WEP), after this I can't connect to ANY net (open too).

ath9k is totally blown up, I hope next release will see a fix.

Il giorno 11 aprile 2012 23:08, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com ha
scritto:

 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
 ulpianoso...@gmail.com wrote:

  I believe it will be fixed in the next release...
 
  you mean 3.3.2 or 3.4 ?

 I saw a post that 3.4 will have a fix.

 --
 mike c



Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-10 Thread Sébastien le Preste de Vauban

 El 08/04/12 09:14, Richard Schütz escribió:

Am 08.04.2012 14:03, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:


I didn't notice any problem with wireless on my notebook before kernel
3.3.1 (I use it every evening). Right now I downgraded to kernel 3.3.0
(took necessary files from projects.archlinux.org/... for version 
3.3.0

compiled and intalled .tar.xz packages) and wireless works fine.

I have access to other notebook with Archlinux and kernel 3.3.1, that
notebook provides AP using hostapd (Atheros wireless card), I'll 
try tomorrow

if AP still works (after update to kernel 3.3.1 I didn't test AP).


Ah, you're talking about the wireless problems. I thought you meant 
the suspend problems with „Same here“. Yeah, ath9k is definitely 
broken.




Since last kernel upgrade, 3.3.1-1-ARCH I am having some trouble with 
ath5k, like random disconnects only a reboot allows me to reconnect to 
the AP.

Now I downgraded to 3.2.14-1 and wifi is working fine.

dmesg:
http://pastebin.com/xiZ4v29f


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-10 Thread mike cloaked
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
ulpianoso...@gmail.com wrote:


 Since last kernel upgrade, 3.3.1-1-ARCH I am having some trouble with ath5k,
 like random disconnects only a reboot allows me to reconnect to the AP.
 Now I downgraded to 3.2.14-1 and wifi is working fine.

This is a well known problem and reported a number of times already -
I believe it will be fixed in the next release...

-- 
mike c


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Richard Schütz

Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:

Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:


On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:



Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:

Hi guys,
please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.




Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].



[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038




I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.


Same here:
Archlinux x86_64,
testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
wi-fi.


And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?

--
Regards,
Richard Schütz


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:48:11 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
 Hello,
 ** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:

 On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

 Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
 Hi guys,
 please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.


 Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
 like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
 breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].

 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038


 I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
 fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
 kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.

 Same here:
 Archlinux x86_64,
 testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
 HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
 wi-fi.

And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?


Correct. The won't resume on 3.3.x eeepc is suspending / resuming
happily with 3.2.13-1-ARCH (downgraded a couple of days ago). As it's
the wife's machine, I dare not touch it now it's working again.

I'm somewhat baffled by the whole thing; there is nothing obvious in
any logs, but X fails to come back from sleep.

-jh




Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello,
** Richard Schütz [2012-04-08 13:48:11 +0200]:

 Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:

On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.


Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038


I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.

Same here:
Archlinux x86_64,
testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
wi-fi.

 And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?

I didn't notice any problem with wireless on my notebook before kernel
3.3.1 (I use it every evening). Right now I downgraded to kernel 3.3.0
(took necessary files from projects.archlinux.org/... for version 3.3.0
compiled and intalled .tar.xz packages) and wireless works fine.

I have access to other notebook with Archlinux and kernel 3.3.1, that
notebook provides AP using hostapd (Atheros wireless card), I'll try tomorrow
if AP still works (after update to kernel 3.3.1 I didn't test AP).

---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov

-- 
Neutrinos are into physicists.


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Richard Schütz

Am 08.04.2012 14:03, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:

Hello,
** Richard Schütz [2012-04-08 13:48:11 +0200]:


Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:

Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:



On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:



Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:

Hi guys,
please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.




Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].



[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038




I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.



Same here:
Archlinux x86_64,
testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
wi-fi.



And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?


I didn't notice any problem with wireless on my notebook before kernel
3.3.1 (I use it every evening). Right now I downgraded to kernel 3.3.0
(took necessary files from projects.archlinux.org/... for version 3.3.0
compiled and intalled .tar.xz packages) and wireless works fine.

I have access to other notebook with Archlinux and kernel 3.3.1, that
notebook provides AP using hostapd (Atheros wireless card), I'll try tomorrow
if AP still works (after update to kernel 3.3.1 I didn't test AP).


Ah, you're talking about the wireless problems. I thought you meant the 
suspend problems with „Same here“. Yeah, ath9k is definitely broken.


--
Regards,
Richard Schütz


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-08 12:53:42 +0100]:

 On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:48:11 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
 Hello,
 ** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:

 On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

 Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
 like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
 breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].

 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038

 I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
 fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
 kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.

 Same here:
 Archlinux x86_64,
 testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
 HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
 wi-fi.

And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?

 Correct. The won't resume on 3.3.x eeepc is suspending / resuming
 happily with 3.2.13-1-ARCH (downgraded a couple of days ago). As it's
 the wife's machine, I dare not touch it now it's working again.

 I'm somewhat baffled by the whole thing; there is nothing obvious in
 any logs, but X fails to come back from sleep.

Do you mean suspend to RAM or suspend to DISK? I tried before
suspend to DISK: 3.3.1 and 3.3.0 works fine.

P.S. I use advice found on wiki and systemd.

---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov

-- 
People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin
Franklin said it first.


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:20:35 +0900, Vladimir Lomov wrote:

Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-08 12:53:42 +0100]:

 On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:48:11 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
 Hello,
 ** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:

 On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

 Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
 like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
 breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].

 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038

 I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
 fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
 kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.

 Same here:
 Archlinux x86_64,
 testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
 HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
 wi-fi.

And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?

 Correct. The won't resume on 3.3.x eeepc is suspending / resuming
 happily with 3.2.13-1-ARCH (downgraded a couple of days ago). As it's
 the wife's machine, I dare not touch it now it's working again.

 I'm somewhat baffled by the whole thing; there is nothing obvious in
 any logs, but X fails to come back from sleep.

Do you mean suspend to RAM or suspend to DISK? I tried before
suspend to DISK: 3.3.1 and 3.3.0 works fine.

P.S. I use advice found on wiki and systemd.

---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov

Suspend to RAM.

-jh





Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Richard Schütz

Am 08.04.2012 14:20, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:

Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-08 12:53:42 +0100]:


On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:48:11 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:



Am 07.04.2012 12:33, schrieb Vladimir Lomov:

Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:



On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:



Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].



[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038



I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.



Same here:
Archlinux x86_64,
testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
wi-fi.



And with 3.2.x there were no problems like that for both of you?



Correct. The won't resume on 3.3.x eeepc is suspending / resuming
happily with 3.2.13-1-ARCH (downgraded a couple of days ago). As it's
the wife's machine, I dare not touch it now it's working again.



I'm somewhat baffled by the whole thing; there is nothing obvious in
any logs, but X fails to come back from sleep.


Do you mean suspend to RAM or suspend to DISK? I tried before
suspend to DISK: 3.3.1 and 3.3.0 works fine.


I'm talking about suspend to RAM, but it shouldn't make that big 
difference in my case, because something seems to be wrong with device 
suspension already.


--
Regards,
Richard Schütz


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-08 Thread Genes MailLists
On 04/06/2012 02:41 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
 Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
 Hi guys,
 please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.

 Upstream changes:
 http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
...

 Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks



  This may be of interest on suspend/resume for some - I suspend to ram
and resume with no problems at all on my lenovo intel based laptop.
Glancing at the changelog seems like the patch is not a part of 3.3.1

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/7/33

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=e72acc13c770a82b4ce4a07e9716f29320eae0f8

gene/


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-07 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello,
** Jonathan Hudson [2012-04-06 20:00:33 +0100]:

 On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
 Hi guys,
 please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.


Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks 
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously 
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038


 I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
 fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
 kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.

Same here:
Archlinux x86_64,
testing, kernel 3.1.1-1
HW: HP Pavilion dv3 (2210er) with nvidia g104m graphics card, atheros
wi-fi.

P.S. At first I post message in worng ML, sorry.

---
WBR, Vladimir Lomov

-- 
Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans; it's lovely to be silly
at the right moment.
-- Horace


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-06 Thread Genes MailLists
On 04/06/2012 06:54 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
 Hi guys,
 please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.
 

  First off thank you arch devs. I am newish to arch (was with
fedora/redhat since about RH 3).

  I am very happy with the arch - huge thank you.

  On 3.3.1, obviously I can't sign off - but here's some fedeback.

  I can attest that the OOPS i was seeing with 3.3 (crash on shutdown or
sleep - bluetooth) has not yet happened with 3.3.1.

  I have seen no other problems (encrypted swap / home, 1 laptop w
iwlwifi, 3 desktops). It has been very stable - no issues and no
worrisome logs on any of the machines I am testing on.

  Thanks!

 gene/




Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-06 Thread Richard Schütz

Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:

Hi guys,
please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.

Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges

Config cleanup:
- disabled comedi staging modules
- disabled not needed GPIO modules
- disabled W1 support
- disabled charger and battery modules
- disabled snd_soc module
- disabled regulator modules
- disabled SPI support

Fixed Bugs and feature requests:
- New default 'ondemand' cpufreq govenor #28778
- added mtd header files #29076
- more I can't remember ;)

greetings
tpowa


Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks 
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously 
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].


[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038

--
Regards,
Richard Schütz


Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-06 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:41:46 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote:

Am 06.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
 Hi guys,
 please signoff 3.3 series for both arches.


Since 3.3.0 suspend isn't working on my desktop computer anymore. Looks 
like device suspension fails somewhere. Furthermore 3.3.1 seriously 
breaks ath9k on my netbook [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43038


I have a similar reservation. On two eeepc 901, suspend works just
fine. Alas, only only on one of them does resume work with a 3.3
kernel. I'm not convinced that 3.3 is ready.

-jh






Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.3.1-1

2012-04-06 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
hello,

well this is a bit off-topic.

But linux-ck switched already to 3.3 kernel and I just discovered that
ndiswrapper does not compile.

It seems there is a patch floating around to allow ndiswrapper to
compile with a 3.3 kernel

But I see no ndiswrapper package in [community-testing] yet ?

Could the ndiswrapper package be included in [extra] instead of
[community] ?

mylife
What a bad idea to remove my ethernet cable and to have now to rely on a
PCI wifi card only supported via ndiswrapper. :-(
/mylife


make -C utils
make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire
« /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/utils »
gcc -g -Wall -I../driver
-Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,--hash-style=gnu -o
loadndisdriver loadndisdriver.c
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire
« /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/utils »
make -C driver
make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire
« /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver »
make -C /usr/src/linux-3.3.1-2-ck
M=/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver
make[2] : on entre dans le répertoire « /usr/src/linux-3.3.1-2-ck »

LD  /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/built-in.o

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/crt_exports.h

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/hal_exports.h

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis_exports.h

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ntoskernel_exports.h

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ntoskernel_io_exports.h

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/rtl_exports.h

MKEXPORT 
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/usb_exports.h
  CC
[M]  /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/crt.o
  CC
[M]  /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/hal.o
  CC
[M]  /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/iw_ndis.o
  CC
[M]  /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/loader.o
  CC
[M]  /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis.o
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis.c: In
function ‘NdisGetCurrentProcessorCounts’:
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis.c:2657:296: 
erreur: ‘struct kernel_stat’ has no member named ‘cpustat’
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis.c:2658:303: 
erreur: ‘struct kernel_stat’ has no member named ‘cpustat’
/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis.c:2659:289: 
erreur: ‘struct kernel_stat’ has no member named ‘cpustat’
make[3]: ***
[/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver/ndis.o]
Erreur 1
make[2]: ***
[_module_/home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver]
Erreur 2
make[2] : on quitte le répertoire « /usr/src/linux-3.3.1-2-ck »
make[1]: *** [modules] Erreur 2
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire
« /home/solstice/abs/ndiswrapper/src/ndiswrapper-1.57/driver »
make: *** [driver] Erreur 2