Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 20:47:19 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > Feel free to provide a git patch. I made what changes I could see > (Pierre or Dan, I trust you guys with the web side more than myself - > could you make those changes live?) Looks fine to me now; pushed the changes to gudrun (this sound funny somehow...) -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:37:09 -0500 > Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200 >> > Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> > >> >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: >> >> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin: >> >> > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live? >> >> > >> >> > done >> >> >> >> Well, some links are wrong; mainly all to http://archlinux.org. They >> >> should be replaced by ftp links. >> >> >> >> PS: No, I cannot commit there. :-) >> >> >> > >> > there were more changes then just the version. (eg ftp -> netinstall and >> > such) >> > to be sure it's probably easiest to find a mirrored copy. >> > however >> > http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:http://www.archlinux.org/download/ is >> > too up to date. >> > and http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://archlinux.org/download doesn't >> > have enough versions :( >> >> Made some changes and pushed. Hope I got everything > > It still links to non-existing ftp images (they are netinstall now) > I think we also restructured the entire page. not sure.. Feel free to provide a git patch. I made what changes I could see (Pierre or Dan, I trust you guys with the web side more than myself - could you make those changes live?)
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:37:09 -0500 Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200 > > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > > >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > >> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > >> > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live? > >> > > >> > done > >> > >> Well, some links are wrong; mainly all to http://archlinux.org. They > >> should be replaced by ftp links. > >> > >> PS: No, I cannot commit there. :-) > >> > > > > there were more changes then just the version. (eg ftp -> netinstall and > > such) > > to be sure it's probably easiest to find a mirrored copy. > > however > > http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:http://www.archlinux.org/download/ is > > too up to date. > > and http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://archlinux.org/download doesn't have > > enough versions :( > > Made some changes and pushed. Hope I got everything It still links to non-existing ftp images (they are netinstall now) I think we also restructured the entire page. not sure.. Dieter
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200 > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: >> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin: >> > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live? >> > >> > done >> >> Well, some links are wrong; mainly all to http://archlinux.org. They >> should be replaced by ftp links. >> >> PS: No, I cannot commit there. :-) >> > > there were more changes then just the version. (eg ftp -> netinstall and such) > to be sure it's probably easiest to find a mirrored copy. > however > http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:http://www.archlinux.org/download/ is too > up to date. > and http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://archlinux.org/download doesn't have > enough versions :( Made some changes and pushed. Hope I got everything
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200 Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live? > > > > done > > Well, some links are wrong; mainly all to http://archlinux.org. They > should be replaced by ftp links. > > PS: No, I cannot commit there. :-) > there were more changes then just the version. (eg ftp -> netinstall and such) to be sure it's probably easiest to find a mirrored copy. however http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:http://www.archlinux.org/download/ is too up to date. and http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://archlinux.org/download doesn't have enough versions :( Dieter
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live? > > done Well, some links are wrong; mainly all to http://archlinux.org. They should be replaced by ftp links. PS: No, I cannot commit there. :-) -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > If someone has a chance, can you release this live? done -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 09:57:44 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: >>> For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now >>> http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old page with the 2009.02 >>> stuff >>> >>> anyone know how this happened? (server upgrade?) can we restore the correct >>> page? >>> >>> Dieter >> >> forwarding to Dusty. I think htose cahgnes weren't commited to git. > > Dusty is MIA for a bit without an internet connection. Where is the > patch for this? I can apply it sometime. It was likely done in place and never commited. I made the change and pushed it to git. If someone has a chance, can you release this live?
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 09:57:44 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: >> For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now >> http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old page with the 2009.02 >> stuff >> >> anyone know how this happened? (server upgrade?) can we restore the correct >> page? >> >> Dieter > > forwarding to Dusty. I think htose cahgnes weren't commited to git. Dusty is MIA for a bit without an internet connection. Where is the patch for this? I can apply it sometime. -Dan
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 09:57:44 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now > http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old page with the 2009.02 > stuff > > anyone know how this happened? (server upgrade?) can we restore the correct > page? > > Dieter forwarding to Dusty. I think htose cahgnes weren't commited to git. -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [arch-general] Incorrect downloads page (WAS ArcLlinux 2009.02 installation issues)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:06:41 +0300 > "Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Tom K wrote: >> > Why are you using 2009.02? 2009.08 was released last month. >> > >> > T. >> >> Sorry. I'm using 2009.08. >> >> But when I've posted on the mailing list I've looked on >> www.archlinux.org/download for the current version, and on this page >> all the downloads are 2009.02. (I've downloaded the files a few days >> ago, and on my computer they are with the name 2009.08.) Any problems >> with the site? >> >> > > For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now > http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old page with the 2009.02 stuff > > anyone know how this happened? (server upgrade?) can we restore the correct > page? > > Dieter > http://bugs.archlinux.org
