Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 20:58 -0400, Kyle wrote:
 I don't really have the time to scroll down one line at a time, and
 most other people don't really have the time to scroll down 5 lines at
 a time wading through tons upon tons of wrotes, original messages,
 times and dates, angle brackets and messages we have already read as
 many as 10 times or more to get to the likely helpful answer all the
 way at the bottom of all that quoting.

Regarding to this topic I guess writing off-list is the better choice,
OTOH the OT in the subject enables to distinguish the original thread
with this OT.

However ...
Subject: [off-list][arch-general] OT: DNS server help
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:45:26 +0200

I don't care that much about top and bottom posting, but most people on
mailing lists for good reasons do.

The style becomes an issue, if some people post on top and others post
at the bottom. We already are using mail clients with different styles
for the quotation and line break.
... is what I've written off-list.

Now to the list, because there are exceptions.

Kyle, when I know that I write to somebody using braille I don't format
my email in a way, that can't be displayed in braille, e.g.

I wrte a text with a typo.
    wrote

If I know somebody has an issue with his computer and she/he only can
use her/his wristwatch, I would bear this in mind too, when replying.

IMO you're mistaken. People usually don't post a complete message, most
of the times we [snip] a lot of text, especially signatures and mailing
list legends.

When I write a personal letter I prefer not to quote, but to write in a
way, that quotation isn't needed. For a reply on a mailing list it's
less time consuming to quote by cuttings and reply below it. In forums
this seldom is useful, there people most of the times quote because of
self-importance, to ensure the poster they reply to, doesn't edit the
original post, one of many good reason to prefer mailing lists instead.

I hope those posting discussions will stop one day and we only will
point out to stop it, without discussing it again, if top posting really
becomes annoying.

I like to encourage people not to use their Android, iThingy, MS web
thingy or wristwatch when writing to Linux home computer mailing lists,
as long as those things cause issues and the topic shouldn't be urgent.
If a MUA force you to CC, the way you need to post etc., I wonder why
people use such bad software. Seems to be the first step before the MUAs
include chatbods that force the contend of the emails body.

2 Cents,
Ralf



Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-13 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 I like to encourage people not to use their Android, iThingy, MS web
 thingy or wristwatch when writing to Linux home computer mailing lists,
 as long as those things cause issues and the topic shouldn't be urgent.
 If a MUA force you to CC, the way you need to post etc., I wonder why
 people use such bad software. Seems to be the first step before the MUAs
 include chatbods that force the contend of the emails body.

 2 Cents,
 Ralf

I use Android and gmail myself, and none of the Android clients
'force' you to post in a particular way. In the stock Gmail client you
can edit inline with one button press which is why I've never
understood the protestations of those who say they're 'forced' to do
something by their provider/software. Unless, of course, being too
lazy to delete some lines by holding the backspace key counts as being
'forced'.


Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread Δημήτρης Ζέρβας
so you want an email like:
Q
A
??? sorry, next time i will ask questions and wait for an answer...
i can' correct the signature right now...
On Jun 13, 2012 12:29 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:

 On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:20 +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
  i didn't understand the PS

 Irony?

 Question: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
 Answer: Top-posting.
 Question: Why is it such a bad thing?
 Answer: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
 text.

 Regarding to the signature, shouldn't it be two dashes + a space? -- 

 --
 Ralf






Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread David J. Haines
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:35:00AM +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
 so you want an email like:
 Q
 A
 ??? sorry, next time i will ask questions and wait for an answer...
 i can' correct the signature right now...
 On Jun 13, 2012 12:29 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
 
  On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:20 +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
   i didn't understand the PS
 
  Irony?
 
  Question: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
  Answer: Top-posting.
  Question: Why is it such a bad thing?
  Answer: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
  text.
 
  Regarding to the signature, shouldn't it be two dashes + a space? -- 
 
  --
  Ralf
 
 
 
 
No, we just want you to respond to prior e-mails like I am: at the
bottom of the string, not the top.
-- 
David J. Haines
djhai...@gmx.com


Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread Δημήτρης Ζέρβας
i just understood...
On Jun 13, 2012 12:38 AM, David J. Haines djhai...@gmx.com wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:35:00AM +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
  so you want an email like:
  Q
  A
  ??? sorry, next time i will ask questions and wait for an answer...
  i can' correct the signature right now...
  On Jun 13, 2012 12:29 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
wrote:
 
   On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:20 +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
i didn't understand the PS
  
   Irony?
  
   Question: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
   Answer: Top-posting.
   Question: Why is it such a bad thing?
   Answer: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
   text.
  
   Regarding to the signature, shouldn't it be two dashes + a space? --

  
   --
   Ralf
  
  
  
  
 No, we just want you to respond to prior e-mails like I am: at the
 bottom of the string, not the top.
 --
 David J. Haines
 djhai...@gmx.com
understood...
i use gmail from desktop and its a problem


Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread Δημήτρης Ζέρβας
On Jun 13, 2012 12:46 AM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com wrote:

 i just understood...

 On Jun 13, 2012 12:38 AM, David J. Haines djhai...@gmx.com wrote:
 
  On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:35:00AM +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
   so you want an email like:
   Q
   A
   ??? sorry, next time i will ask questions and wait for an answer...
   i can' correct the signature right now...
   On Jun 13, 2012 12:29 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
wrote:
  
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:20 +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
 i didn't understand the PS
   
Irony?
   
Question: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Answer: Top-posting.
Question: Why is it such a bad thing?
Answer: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
text.
   
Regarding to the signature, shouldn't it be two dashes + a space?
-- 
   
--
Ralf
   
   
   
   
  No, we just want you to respond to prior e-mails like I am: at the
  bottom of the string, not the top.
  --
  David J. Haines
  djhai...@gmx.com
 understood...
 i use gmail from desktop and its a problem

oh god, conversation fucked up... i responded top and then bottom and now i
see the quoted text!!! and your signature! FU gmail!


Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Jun 13, 2012 12:46 AM, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com wrote:

 i just understood...

 On Jun 13, 2012 12:38 AM, David J. Haines djhai...@gmx.com wrote:
 
  On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:35:00AM +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
   so you want an email like:
   Q
   A
   ??? sorry, next time i will ask questions and wait for an answer...
   i can' correct the signature right now...
   On Jun 13, 2012 12:29 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
 wrote:
  
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:20 +0300, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
 i didn't understand the PS
   
Irony?
   
Question: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Answer: Top-posting.
Question: Why is it such a bad thing?
Answer: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
text.
   
Regarding to the signature, shouldn't it be two dashes + a space?
 -- 
   
--
Ralf
   
   
   
   
  No, we just want you to respond to prior e-mails like I am: at the
  bottom of the string, not the top.
  --
  David J. Haines
  djhai...@gmx.com
 understood...
 i use gmail from desktop and its a problem

 oh god, conversation fucked up... i responded top and then bottom and now i
 see the quoted text!!! and your signature! FU gmail!

It is true gmail is very bad for mailing lists, this is why many use
an email client.
Also gmail is bad if you care about security this is why many use
their own email server.. so again email client. (and this is the point
when you buy a VPS) :P
Gmail doesn't support encrypting your emails (for obvious reasons) so
many use email client.

I just noticed I could have used a variable for the string: 'many use
an email client'


-- 
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.

#include stdio.h
int main(){printf(%s,\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73);}


Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread Δημήτρης Ζέρβας
scripting mail client! brilliant idea!
i stop quoting from my android...
why is mail server better?


Re: [arch-general] OT: DNS server help

2012-06-12 Thread Kyle
Q: What's the most annoying thing in an e-mail?
A:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 at 3:27:49 PM, Somebody Nu someb...@somewhere.nu 
wrote:
 On Monday, June 11, 2012 at 7:28:46 AM, Yesterdays Child remem...@iwrote.it 
 wrote:
  - Original Message -
  From: Remember Me ple...@dontforget.me
  Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 at 11:37:15 PM
   This is the original question I asked on this list. And this is its 
   fourth showing.
  This is a response I gave, and I really hope it gets a third look.
 I also responded to the original post, and I bet somebody's even going to
 leave the signatures and list footers in the message before posting a helpful
 one-line response all the way down at the bottom.

 --
 here is a really cool signature that I hope everyone reads again and again.
 Lovely. I gave my signature a second line. Wait, there's a third line with a
 http://link.to.my.informative.blog.com

 -- 
 List Footer Mailing List
 http://www.mailinglists.com/mailman/listinfo/listfooter.html
 To unsubscribe, go to
 http://www.mailinglists.com/mailman/listinfo/listfooter-unsubscribe.html
 or send a blank e-mail to listfooter-requ...@mailinglists.com with 
 unsubscribe in the subject.
Now here comes my rather enlightening remark, finaly. Hey, I made you scroll 
all the way down to the bottom of this one. I hope you are reading this on a 
mobile phone. Aren't I a good bottom poster?
Q: Why is this a bad thing?
A: People read e-mail many different ways on many different devices. The mobile 
phone is one example of a commonly used device for reading e-mail these days. 
Although people seem to enjoy staring at that little screen all day long for 
everything in the world, those teeny tiny screens are much harder to read than 
even the blurry fuzzy green screens from the past. Unfortunately, until I can 
get my computer working again, I am using my mobile phone exclusively for 
reading my e-mail, and worse still, my phone uses speech, because I also happen 
to be visually impaired. I don't really have the time to scroll down one line 
at a time, and most other people don't really have the time to scroll down 5 
lines at a time wading through tons upon tons of wrotes, original messages, 
times and dates, angle brackets and messages we have already read as many as 10 
times or more to get to the likely helpful answer all the way at the bottom of 
all that quoting. Likewise, all that quoting at the bottom of
a helpful response is also rather bad, but it is certainly easier to ignore 
unless there is a specific reference to a potentially forgotten part of the 
quoted message.

As a general rule, top posting and bottom posting should both be avoided. 
Whenever I post a response to a message, I *only* quote if I feel that there is 
something to be gained from reading the exact words of the OP again, usually to 
answer specific questions in a sort of Q/A format or to respond to specific 
points in a message one point at a time. Otherwise, I completely turn off 
quoting and state my response in such a way that no one has to read the 
original post over again in an attempt to figure out what in the world I'm 
talking about. This usually saves a lot of people a lot of headaches and a lot 
of time in the end. The reader will note that aside from the bogus quoting near 
the top of this message, I have not felt the need to include any real quoting 
in this message, but most people will certainly be able to deduce the context, 
even though this message is a response to the whole top vs bottom posting 
fireworks rather than the original post regarding DNS servers.
~Kyle
-- 
Kyle is a droid.
The whole world knows it.
This e-mail shows it.