Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the > > > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? > > > > > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org Patrick > > > O'Callaghan wrote: > > >> the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2 > > > > > > "The latest stable release tarballs were uploaded on May 12, 2014: > > > > > > evolution-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS) > > > evolution-data-server-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)" - > > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution#Get_the_Source_Code > > > > The wiki page wasn't updated for the latest stable release: > > > > https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.12/ > > > > The tags in the Git repositories are the best source of information, not > > the wiki documentation. > > IIUC this doesn't mean that it's the current stable version. > "LATEST-IS-3.13.3 23-Jun-2014 07:15" - > https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.13/ > > IIUC 3.13.2 is the official stable release from upstream. 3.12.2 pardon a typo, ...12..., not ...13... .
Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the > > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? > > > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org Patrick > > O'Callaghan wrote: > >> the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2 > > > > "The latest stable release tarballs were uploaded on May 12, 2014: > > > > evolution-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS) > > evolution-data-server-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)" - > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution#Get_the_Source_Code > > The wiki page wasn't updated for the latest stable release: > > https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.12/ > > The tags in the Git repositories are the best source of information, not > the wiki documentation. IIUC this doesn't mean that it's the current stable version. "LATEST-IS-3.13.3 23-Jun-2014 07:15" - https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.13/ IIUC 3.13.2 is the official stable release from upstream.
Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?
On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org Patrick > O'Callaghan wrote: >> the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2 > > "The latest stable release tarballs were uploaded on May 12, 2014: > > evolution-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS) > evolution-data-server-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)" - > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution#Get_the_Source_Code The wiki page wasn't updated for the latest stable release: https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.12/ The tags in the Git repositories are the best source of information, not the wiki documentation. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
