Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

2010-05-10 Thread Damjan Georgievski
 Hi everyone,

 As stated by mrbrich in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script
 [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0).  I made
 this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it.  Could anyone using
 it give it a try please?

At this time it might be better to use the -git version
There's a small number of fairly important changes (and 2.0 has been
released more that a year ago)

-- 
damjan


Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

2010-05-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
 Hi everyone,
 
 As stated by mrbrich in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script
 [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0).  I made
 this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it.  Could anyone using
 it give it a try please?
 
 Thanks
 
 Guillaume ALAUX
 
 [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=95899
 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/hibernate-script/
 [3] http://archlinux.alaux.net/hibernate-script-2.0-2.src.tar.gz
 

I used to maintain this, but neither have the time nor the possibility
to test it right now. I orphaned it and requested another Dev or TU to
take it. Nobody ever responded, which means you can put the package in
the AUR and I'll delete it from the repository.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

2010-05-10 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way
would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did
for v1.99?

On 10 May 2010 15:50, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:

 Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
  Hi everyone,
 
  As stated by mrbrich in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script
  [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0).  I
 made
  this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it.  Could anyone
 using
  it give it a try please?
 
  Thanks
 
  Guillaume ALAUX
 
  [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=95899
  [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/hibernate-script/
  [3] http://archlinux.alaux.net/hibernate-script-2.0-2.src.tar.gz
 

 I used to maintain this, but neither have the time nor the possibility
 to test it right now. I orphaned it and requested another Dev or TU to
 take it. Nobody ever responded, which means you can put the package in
 the AUR and I'll delete it from the repository.




Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

2010-05-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
 OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way
 would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did
 for v1.99?

In the past I always used the stable version. However, I never used it
together with tuxonice, but only with usual suspend to RAM, so I don't
know how good the tuxonice support is in the stable release.

As I said, I haven't actually been maintaining this recently.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

2010-05-10 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
Hi Thomas,

Here is the package I have just uploaded in AUR:

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37110

You can delete it from extra then. I checked others PKGBUILD and none of
them make any reference to it so we should'nt have issues with dependencies.

I will add some explanation on the AUR page to explain that this pkg
requires testing and feedback.
I will also get the wiki page up to date to reflect this repo change if you
confirm you deleted it.

Thanks.

Guillaume ALAUX

On 10 May 2010 16:01, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:

 Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
  OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way
  would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you
 did
  for v1.99?

 In the past I always used the stable version. However, I never used it
 together with tuxonice, but only with usual suspend to RAM, so I don't
 know how good the tuxonice support is in the stable release.

 As I said, I haven't actually been maintaining this recently.