Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

2018-11-11 Thread David Runge
On 2018-11-10 15:23:38 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> David, don't forget that the CoC also applies to TUs. There was a long
> thread about this on AUR general. TIA Ralf
I'm glad you realize that, but fail to see the relevance for the topic
at hand. If your remark is supposed to be a threat of some sort, it's
not a very good one.

In case you're asking yourself why I mentioned the CoC on arch-proaudio:
You have been on moderation not without reason. However, you showed no
remorse for your behavior towards others. Then you used this mailing
list to drag other people into the topic.

That being said: I don't feel like moderating your submissions, as this
is time consuming and I certainly don't enjoy reading your mails twice.
I'd rather trust in your good will to not misuse the trust bestowed upon
you (hence the lift of moderation).

If you feel, that there are still open questions regarding this topic,
you can write to me off-list.

Best,
David

-- 
https://sleepmap.de


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

2018-11-10 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 05:36:08AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general 
 wrote:
> mails to mail...@lists.archlinux.org [1] are rejected.

Thanks for the notification. It should work again now.

Florian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

2018-11-10 Thread vsec
Reply to Ralf Mardorf via arch-general

> Hi,
> 
> mails to mail...@lists.archlinux.org [1] are rejected.
The same problem.

> I try to get in contact with the owner of one list, but don't get a
> reply.
> 
> Regards,
> Ralf


Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

2018-11-10 Thread Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 12:28 +0100, David Runge wrote:
> In any case: There's no need to send an e-mail to arch-general about
> your moderation. You simply were on moderation and mailman notifies you
> about that. There's nothing special about this case, so please stop
> posting all over the place and simply wait.

David, don't forget that the CoC also applies to TUs. There was a long
thread about this on AUR general. TIA Ralf


Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

2018-11-10 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi David,

> > "If you are having trouble using the lists, please contact
> > mail...@lists.archlinux.org." - https://lists.archlinux.org/
>
> I guess a more useful /dev/null address could be put there, as we can
> assume, that the default mailman@ mailing list is either deactivated
> or doesn't exist anymore. However, that contact mail address is more
> aimed at list administrators (AFAIK).

I'd read that page as saying mailman@ is for me as a
non-list-administrator;  like postmaster@, but Mailman specific.  The
`List administrators...' start to the previous paragraph, I take to
apply only to that paragraph.

mailman@ has probably just been dropped by accident somewhere.  I see
lists.archlinux.org's Postfix is happy with `mailman' as a recipient,
tested with `rcpt to:...', unlike a random username, so it clears the
first hurdle.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy


Re: [arch-general] https://lists.archlinux.org/

2018-11-10 Thread David Runge
On 2018-11-10 05:36:08 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> mails to mail...@lists.archlinux.org [1] are rejected.
> 
> I try to get in contact with the owner of one list, but don't get a
> reply.
> 
> Regards,
> Ralf
> 
> 
> [1]
> "If you are having trouble using the lists, please contact
> mail...@lists.archlinux.org." - https://lists.archlinux.org/
The one list you're seemingly having trouble with is arch-proaudio [1].
You have been on moderation there for quite some time (and I reverted
this now - as written there a few minutes ago).
The owner contact address for that list would be arch-proaudio-owner@.
You tried to send your mail to a mail address (mailman@) only (not so)
relevant to the mailman setup.
I guess a more useful /dev/null address could be put there, as we can
assume, that the default mailman@ mailing list is either deactivated or
doesn't exist anymore. However, that contact mail address is more aimed
at list administrators (AFAIK).

In any case: There's no need to send an e-mail to arch-general about
your moderation. You simply were on moderation and mailman notifies you
about that. There's nothing special about this case, so please stop
posting all over the place and simply wait.

If you don't get a reply instantly, this doesn't mean noone is receiving
your emails. It only means a human on the other end simply either didn't
have the time to work on your moderation or to even read your mail.
All relevant information about your moderation can be found on
arch-proaudio.

Best,
David

[1] https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-proaudio

-- 
https://sleepmap.de


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature