[Archivesspace_Users_Group] RESCHEDULED: ArchivesSpace Open Community Call -- Nov 1st at 2pm ET (11am PT)

2018-10-24 Thread Christine Kim 
Dear ArchivesSpace members,

We are rescheduling our Open Community Call due to a scheduling conflict on our 
end. We apologize for any confusion this causes, but hope you will be able to 
join us next week on November 1st instead.

Please join us for our next community Zoom call on November 1 at 2-3pm ET 
(11-noon PT). This is an opportunity to hear updates from each other and 
encourage group discussion. The community call is a space to surface news, 
ideas, and challenges. This may also be an especially good chance to talk about 
non-technical questions or ideas that you weren’t quite sure about posting on 
the Users Group listserv but really would like help with from us or your peers. 
You will be able to join by either computer or phone.

In an effort to be more organized, here is a pre-survey to help generate 
discussion topics prior to the call. Please submit your suggestions by 
Wednesday, October 31.
https://goo.gl/forms/sBnZLgpZJv95LEcx1

Here are the details of joining the call:

  *   Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/804518729
  *   Or iPhone one-tap :
 *   US: +16468769923,,804518729#  or +16699006833,,804518729#
  *   Or Telephone：
 *   Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location)：
 *   US: +1 646 876 9923  or +1 669 900 6833  or +1 408 638 0968
 *   Meeting ID: 804 518 729
  *   International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=-CnZdNUzB4VhAipYXVQs3X1IOX8LOfFC

Please email me at christine@lyrasis.org 
if you have any questions about the call. Thanks so much, and we look forward 
to seeing you there!

Best wishes,
Christine

Christine Kim
ArchivesSpace Community Engagement Coordinator
christine@lyrasis.org
800.999.8558 x4820
404.592.4820
Skype: ckim.lyrasis
___
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

[Archivesspace_Users_Group] seeking member feedback

2018-10-24 Thread Tang, Lydia 
Hi all,
On behalf of Dev. Pri., I am seeking member feedback on this ticket:
https://archivesspace.atlassian.net/browse/ANW-657
This is a proposal to change the terminology of Background Jobs for clarity.  I 
am seeking feedback on if “Background Jobs” as a grouping should be changed.  
Also see the ticket for proposed changes for the Background Job function titles.
I realize these could probably be updated on an individual basis via the config 
file (maybe?), but this topic came up during the Staff Interface Enhancement 
Working Group project and may be a common point of confusion for newer users.
Thoughts?  Thank you!
Lydia
Chair, Development Prioritization subteam
___
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration

2018-10-24 Thread Jenn Colt 
This is basically the list we are working on for our local implementation's 
integration with Voyager (and Folio in the future).


Most of our work right now is in scripts between ASpace and Voyager using the 
ASpace APIs  and our Voyager batch processes rather than modifications within 
either system.


From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org 
 on behalf of Kevin 
Clair 
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:27:28 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration


For us, we want to be able to:


  *   create holdings and items in Alma, from ArchivesSpace, using existing Top 
Container metadata;
  *   compare MARC records for a Resource between the two systems, and push 
to/pull from Alma as needed to keep metadata in sync; and
  *   compare item-level metadata between the two systems, and eventually to 
push to/pull from Alma as needed to keep inventory records in sync

In general we want to keep archival description work in ArchivesSpace and use 
the APIs to update Alma, instead of having to train archivists on metadata 
management in two different systems. This way only the folks who do manuscripts 
and special collections cataloging need to work with the Alma metadata editor 
directly.

I'd be interested to hear others' ideas!  -k

From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org 
 on behalf of Megan 
Firestone 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 9:27:21 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration

Hi,

It's exciting to see so many interested.  To help develop the conversation, 
what type of functionality would you like to see in an integration between Alma 
and ArchivesSpace?

Best,
Megan

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:57 AM Chad Mills 
mailto:chad.mi...@rutgers.edu>> wrote:

Hi,



We are interested!  At Rutgers earlier this year we developed a reference 
architecture for our Special Collections.  We tested the reference architecture 
by creating an implementation architecture using Alma, Primo, ArchiveSpace and 
a generic repository framework.  In June we migrated to Alma so we will be 
looking to integrate ArchiveSpace with Alma in the near future using our the 
reference architecture as a blue print.  I’ll see if I can share that reference 
architecture with the group.



Best,

Chad



-
Chad Mills
Digital Library Architect
Rutgers University Libraries
Phone: 848.932.5924
Cell: 732.309.8538
-





From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org
 
[mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org]
 On Behalf Of Megan Firestone
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:34 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration



Hi,



We us Alma as our library ILS here, so we have been looking at the possibility 
of integrating Alma and ArchivesSpace.  I was curious if anyone else is 
interested in this type of integration and if there is any work being done?



Thanks!

Megan

--

Megan M. Firestone
Archivist and Public Services Librarian
Munday Library
St. Edward's University
3001 S. Congress Ave.
Austin, TX 78704
512.428.1047

___
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group


--
Megan M. Firestone
Archivist and Public Services Librarian
Munday Library
St. Edward's University
3001 S. Congress Ave.
Austin, TX 78704
512.428.1047
___
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration

2018-10-24 Thread Kevin Clair 
For us, we want to be able to:


  *   create holdings and items in Alma, from ArchivesSpace, using existing Top 
Container metadata;
  *   compare MARC records for a Resource between the two systems, and push 
to/pull from Alma as needed to keep metadata in sync; and
  *   compare item-level metadata between the two systems, and eventually to 
push to/pull from Alma as needed to keep inventory records in sync

In general we want to keep archival description work in ArchivesSpace and use 
the APIs to update Alma, instead of having to train archivists on metadata 
management in two different systems. This way only the folks who do manuscripts 
and special collections cataloging need to work with the Alma metadata editor 
directly.

I'd be interested to hear others' ideas!  -k

From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org 
 on behalf of Megan 
Firestone 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 9:27:21 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration

Hi,

It's exciting to see so many interested.  To help develop the conversation, 
what type of functionality would you like to see in an integration between Alma 
and ArchivesSpace?

Best,
Megan

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:57 AM Chad Mills 
mailto:chad.mi...@rutgers.edu>> wrote:

Hi,



We are interested!  At Rutgers earlier this year we developed a reference 
architecture for our Special Collections.  We tested the reference architecture 
by creating an implementation architecture using Alma, Primo, ArchiveSpace and 
a generic repository framework.  In June we migrated to Alma so we will be 
looking to integrate ArchiveSpace with Alma in the near future using our the 
reference architecture as a blue print.  I’ll see if I can share that reference 
architecture with the group.



Best,

Chad



-
Chad Mills
Digital Library Architect
Rutgers University Libraries
Phone: 848.932.5924
Cell: 732.309.8538
-





From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org
 
[mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org]
 On Behalf Of Megan Firestone
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:34 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Alma Integration



Hi,



We us Alma as our library ILS here, so we have been looking at the possibility 
of integrating Alma and ArchivesSpace.  I was curious if anyone else is 
interested in this type of integration and if there is any work being done?



Thanks!

Megan

--

Megan M. Firestone
Archivist and Public Services Librarian
Munday Library
St. Edward's University
3001 S. Congress Ave.
Austin, TX 78704
512.428.1047

___
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group


--
Megan M. Firestone
Archivist and Public Services Librarian
Munday Library
St. Edward's University
3001 S. Congress Ave.
Austin, TX 78704
512.428.1047
___
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group