[fedora-arm] arm F-18 Branched report: 20130201 changes

2013-02-01 Thread arm Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Feb  1 11:10:34 UTC 2013

Broken deps for arm
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-all-0.10.6-2.fc18.noarch requires mongodb-server
aeolus-all-0.10.6-2.fc18.noarch requires iwhd
aeolus-all-0.10.6-2.fc18.noarch requires imagefactory-jeosconf-ec2-rhel
aeolus-all-0.10.6-2.fc18.noarch requires 
imagefactory-jeosconf-ec2-fedora
aeolus-all-0.10.6-2.fc18.noarch requires imagefactory
[asterisk]
asterisk-fax-10.0.0-2.fc18.1.armv5tel requires libtiff.so.3
asterisk-snmp-10.0.0-2.fc18.1.armv5tel requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
asterisk-snmp-10.0.0-2.fc18.1.armv5tel requires librpmio.so.2
asterisk-snmp-10.0.0-2.fc18.1.armv5tel requires librpm.so.2
[bochs]
bochs-2.6-1.fc18.armv5tel requires bochs-bios = 0:2.6-1.fc18
[bootconf]
bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub
[cloud-init]
cloud-init-0.7.1-2.fc18.noarch requires dmidecode
[coccinella]
coccinella-0.96.20-4.fc18.noarch requires iaxclient
[condor-cloud]
condor-cloud-0.1-5.fc18.noarch requires qemu-kvm = 0:0.14
condor-cloud-0.1-5.fc18.noarch requires condor-vm-gahp = 0:7.7.0
condor-cloud-node-0.1-5.fc18.noarch requires qemu-kvm = 0:0.14
condor-cloud-node-0.1-5.fc18.noarch requires condor-vm-gahp = 0:7.7.0
[condor-ec2-enhanced]
condor-ec2-enhanced-1.3.1-1.fc18.noarch requires condor = 0:7.4.4-0.9
[condor-ec2-enhanced-hooks]
condor-ec2-enhanced-hooks-1.3.1-1.fc18.noarch requires condor = 
0:7.2.0-4
[condor-job-hooks]
condor-job-hooks-1.5-6.fc18.noarch requires condor = 0:7.0.2-4
[condor-low-latency]
condor-low-latency-1.2-2.fc18.2.noarch requires condor = 0:7.0.2-4
[condor-wallaby]
condor-wallaby-client-5.0.3-1.fc18.noarch requires python-qmf = 
0:0.9.1073306
condor-wallaby-client-5.0.3-1.fc18.noarch requires condor = 0:7.4.4-0.9
[cumin]
cumin-0.1.5220-2.fc18.noarch requires python-qpid-qmf
[ember-media]
ember-media-0.6.2.1-3.fc18.noarch requires ember  0:0.6.3
ember-media-0.6.2.1-3.fc18.noarch requires ember = 0:0.6.2
[ghc-wai-extra]
ghc-wai-extra-devel-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.armv5tel requires 
ghc-devel(ansi-terminal-0.5.5.1-b2f5e0314ae93aac1eb9d373e2a3db56)
[gnome-boxes]
gnome-boxes-3.6.2-1.fc18.armv5tel requires libvirt-daemon-kvm
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.74-1.fc18.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0
[jaffl]
jaffl-0.5.9-1.fc16.noarch requires jffi
[jnr-ffi]
jnr-ffi-0.5.10-3.fc17.noarch requires jffi
[jnr-posix]
jnr-posix-1.1.8-3.fc18.noarch requires jffi
[jruby]
jruby-1.6.3-3.fc17.noarch requires jffi = 0:1.0.10
[liveusb-creator]
liveusb-creator-3.11.7-2.fc18.noarch requires syslinux-extlinux
liveusb-creator-3.11.7-2.fc18.noarch requires syslinux
[mcollective-qpid-plugin]
mcollective-qpid-plugin-0.1.1-3.fc18.noarch requires ruby-qpid-qmf
[merkaartor]
merkaartor-0.18.0-0.3.git654e49ba.fc17.armv5tel requires libexiv2.so.11
[nfsometer]
nfsometer-1.1-2.fc18.noarch requires filebench
[openlierox]
openlierox-0.57-0.16.beta8.fc15.armv5tel requires libzip.so.1
[openpts]
openpts-0.2.6-4.fc18.armv5tel requires tboot
[openshift-origin-broker]
openshift-origin-broker-0.6.17-3.fc18.noarch requires mongodb-server
[openstack-nova]
openstack-nova-compute-2012.2-1.fc18.noarch requires qemu-kvm
openstack-nova-compute-2012.2-1.fc18.noarch requires libguestfs-mount 
= 0:1.7.17
[ovirt-node]
ovirt-node-2.5.1-1.fc18.noarch requires grub2
[oz]
oz-0.9.0-1.fc18.noarch requires python-libguestfs
[perl-MongoDB]
perl-MongoDB-0.41-3.fc15.armv5tel requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
[pharosc]
pharosc-xcircuit-8.3-6.fc18.noarch requires xcircuit
[rakudo-star]
rakudo-star-0.0.2011.07_3.6.0-5.fc18.1.armv5tel requires 
libparrot.so.3.6.0
[rootplot]
rootplot-2.2.1-6.fc18.noarch requires root-python
[ruby-spqr]
ruby-spqr-0.3.6-3.fc18.noarch requires ruby-qmf
[rubygem-RedCloth]
rubygem-RedCloth-4.2.3-3.fc17.armv5tel requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
rubygem-RedCloth-4.2.3-3.fc17.armv5tel requires libruby.so.1.8
[rubygem-boxgrinder-build]
rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.10.4-1.fc18.noarch requires ruby-libguestfs
[rubygem-childprocess]
rubygem-childprocess-0.2.0-4.fc18.noarch requires rubygem(ffi)  0:1.1
rubygem-childprocess-0.2.0-4.fc18.noarch requires rubygem(ffi) = 
0:1.0.6
[rubygem-openshift-origin-msg-broker-mcollective]
rubygem-openshift-origin-msg-broker-mcollective-0.1.1-9.fc18.noarch 
requires qpid-cpp-server
rubygem-openshift-origin-msg-broker-mcollective-0.1.1-9.fc18.noarch 
requires qpid-cpp-client
[rubygem-rb-inotify]
rubygem-rb-inotify-0.8.8-1.fc18.noarch requires rubygem(ffi)
[rubygem-selenium-webdriver]
rubygem-selenium-webdriver-2.3.2-4.fc18.noarch requires 

Re: [fedora-arm] OMAP F18 RC internal image test success

2013-02-01 Thread Jon Masters
Obviously I am not saying to ship the internal test image. Only that it works 
just fine and I consider OMAP ready for release. It is no worse than beta.
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.

Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:

Hi Folks,

I delayed leaving and changed plans this morning while I extensively tested 
OMAP. The RC image made internally within RC by David works fine, and I can 
once again confirm that the display is working. Ship it.

Jon.
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Re: [fedora-arm] OMAP F18 RC internal image test success

2013-02-01 Thread Jon Masters
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonmasters/sets/72157632664725340/
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.

Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:

Hi Folks,

I delayed leaving and changed plans this morning while I extensively tested 
OMAP. The RC image made internally within RC by David works fine, and I can 
once again confirm that the display is working. Ship it.

Jon.
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

[fedora-arm] Daily Koji Compare Stats

2013-02-01 Thread jon . chiappetta
Fri Feb  1 09:05:01 EST 2013


f17-updates : arm vs PA

 Same |Newer |Older |Local |   Remote | 
 Missing |
--
 3389 |1 |   76 |1 |  244 | 
 107 |

http://142.204.133.82/jon/koji/kc.f17-updates.diff.html


f18 : arm vs PA

 Same |Newer |Older |Local |   Remote | 
 Missing |
--
12286 |   10 |   39 |2 |  279 | 
  39 |

http://142.204.133.82/jon/koji/kc.f18.diff.html


f18-updates-testing : arm vs PA

 Same |Newer |Older |Local |   Remote | 
 Missing |
--
 2781 |6 |   54 |   21 |  137 | 
  57 |

http://142.204.133.82/jon/koji/kc.f18-updates-testing.diff.html


f18-updates : arm vs PA

 Same |Newer |Older |Local |   Remote | 
 Missing |
--
 1485 |1 |5 |0 |   76 | 
   5 |

http://142.204.133.82/jon/koji/kc.f18-updates.diff.html


f19 : arm vs PA

 Same |Newer |Older |Local |   Remote | 
 Missing |
--
 3913 |3 |  727 |1 |  942 | 
1302 |

http://142.204.133.82/jon/koji/kc.f19.diff.html


ARM Build Status Wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora17_rawhide


Fri Feb  1 09:26:01 EST 2013
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

[fedora-arm] IRC - PandaBoard

2013-02-01 Thread Jon Masters
Hello masta,

I tested pkexec. It worked. Yumex will be fine.

I am traveling to Brussels at this time.

Jon.

Masta wrote:

---begin log---
jonmasters [14:35:40] masta:#fedora-arm jonmasters: thanks for
testing the panda, did you notice yumex was happy?
---end of log---

-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

[fedora-arm] IRC - PandaBoard

2013-02-01 Thread Jon Masters
Hello masta,

I tested pkexec. It worked. Yumex will be fine.

I am traveling to Brussels at this time.

Jon.

Masta wrote:

---begin log---
jonmasters [14:35:40] masta:#fedora-arm jonmasters: thanks for
testing the panda, did you notice yumex was happy?
---end of log---
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-02-01 Thread Jon Masters
Derek,

It is less powers that be than a collaborative effort/decision. We do not 
have resources to justify keeping v5 alive but you are free to coordinate with 
others and pick it up, in the same way that Seneca are to own v6 support (maybe 
Seneca can even help with build system setup if you ask them). Do you have any 
interest in driving that?

You will find the ominous powers that be are in fact a bunch of us doing the 
work who are overloaded enough to keep just v7 and v8 on track :) For those who 
are devastated and have no v7 hardware, ping me off list and maybe I can look 
into getting a couple of v7 boards out there.

Jon.
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.

Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:

Quentin Armitage quen...@armitage.org.uk writes:

 since there has been no major objection i will disable building
 armv5tel rpms in rawhide before the mass rebuild.
 
 Dennis
 
 I guess it's too late now, but I got a few days behind on my list emails. I
 use 2 * Sheevaplugs and 2 * Dreamplugs with Fedora, and would be very
 disappointed to see support for them being dropped from Fedora. For me, I
 still see quite a lifetime in them for what they are doing.

I've mentioned multiple times my hope to keep kirkwood support in
Fedora, but alas it feels like the powers that be just don't care about
us *plug users.  :(   If I want to continue using my plugs I guess I'll
have to learn Debuntu.  :(

 Quentin Armitage

-derek
-- 
   Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
   Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
   URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
   warl...@mit.eduPGP key available
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-02-01 Thread Derek Atkins
Jon,

Thanks for the reply.  I certainly don't have the hardware to host a v5
koji.  All I own are 2 Sheevas and 2 Gurus (and not even the Server
Plus models).  Moreover, one of my Sheevas is in critical production
on my network so I can't really pull it away to perform other duties.

I was actually looking at a Cubieboard to get some newer, more powerful
hardware, because the Guru is way too low powered to run my MySQL
instance.  I may even find that the Cubie is too low-powered, but
obviously cannot test that until I have one or have access to one.
Regardless, right now I don't have the budget to acquire new hardware,
which is why I'd like to continue using what I already own.

Not being intimately familiar with the various changes in the hardware I
guess I just don't understand why we need so many target-specific
distributions?  I thought the only issue was the floating point ABI
issue, which would lead me to believe that we only would need two, FP
and non-FP?  Is there really a significant speed improvement with
e.g. v7 or v8 when compiled specifically vs. running e.g. v6 on a v7 or
v8?  ISTR that measurements showed some but relatively insignificant
speed differences, so why not just stay at the lowest level to support
more hardware?

Thanks,

-derek

Jon Masters j...@redhat.com writes:

 Derek,

 It is less powers that be than a collaborative effort/decision. We do not 
 have resources to justify keeping v5 alive but you are free to coordinate 
 with others and pick it up, in the same way that Seneca are to own v6 support 
 (maybe Seneca can even help with build system setup if you ask them). Do you 
 have any interest in driving that?

 You will find the ominous powers that be are in fact a bunch of us doing the 
 work who are overloaded enough to keep just v7 and v8 on track :) For those 
 who are devastated and have no v7 hardware, ping me off list and maybe I can 
 look into getting a couple of v7 boards out there.

 Jon.
 -- 
 Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity.

 Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:

 Quentin Armitage quen...@armitage.org.uk writes:

 since there has been no major objection i will disable building
 armv5tel rpms in rawhide before the mass rebuild.
 
 Dennis
 
 I guess it's too late now, but I got a few days behind on my list emails. I
 use 2 * Sheevaplugs and 2 * Dreamplugs with Fedora, and would be very
 disappointed to see support for them being dropped from Fedora. For me, I
 still see quite a lifetime in them for what they are doing.

 I've mentioned multiple times my hope to keep kirkwood support in
 Fedora, but alas it feels like the powers that be just don't care about
 us *plug users.  :(   If I want to continue using my plugs I guess I'll
 have to learn Debuntu.  :(

 Quentin Armitage

 -derek

-- 
   Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
   Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
   URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
   warl...@mit.eduPGP key available
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm