Re: [fedora-arm] Booting Fedora 19 on OMAP5432 uEVM board
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Chen Baozi wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:29 AM, Jon wrote: > > > Hiya, > > > > > > We have seen initial-setup fail the same way for other boards with > > less memory, and assumed it's a memory pressure type problem. > > > > The OMAP5 uevm board contains 2 GiB of memory, and should not be > > having this problem. > > > > I would suggest open a BZ for this incident. > > > > @Chen, > > As a work around please mount the rootfs and change the root password > > in the /etc/shadow file manually. > > Thanks, I've already done it. So everything running Fedora 19 is fine > except this problem, :) > Is that using the default Fedora kernel? If so which version? Peter ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Re: [fedora-arm] Valgrind: unrecognised instruction
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 03:33:45PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > [Sorry for the late response] > > Sorry I didn't mention that I solved my problem already! > > > GDB should work fine. It certainly works for x86 OCaml programs. > > > > There is a fairly simple relationship between OCaml module + function > > names and the assembly function names exposed in the DWARF > > information, with the only caveat being that multiple functions in a > > single OCaml module are allowed to have the same name (each assembler > > function will have a number after it, but they are not consecutive). > > If you get that it's best to try to correlate the assembly output with > > the function name. The situation recently improved greatly on x86, > > now that the DWARF info contains source file+line#, but I don't know > > if that happened for ARM. > > Ah, yes, a useful debuginfo package is now generated on x86. That's > nice. Is there any chance we could start throwing out all the stuff > in the ocaml spec files that prevents debuginfo package generation? > Or will that cause problems on non-x86 platforms? Yes, this would be a good idea ... I don't think it'll cause problems on non-x86. Worst case it would just produce non-functional debuginfo files there. > As for this bug, it did happen before entering the main OCaml code. > By single stepping through assembly code (that was fun), I was able to > eventually drop back down into OCaml code, which is where the problem > turned out to be (in an initializer). Upstream produced a fix for me, > and the package has already been rebuilt with that fix. But even > though the code now runs fine and gdb can disassemble the function in > question, valgrind still doesn't like that CPU instruction (which has > nothing whatever to do with the actual bug, by the way). I guess a missing emulation of this insn in valgrind, but I'll let people who know more about ARM answer that! Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
[fedora-arm] Automatic AArch64 bootstrap daily update for August 23, 2013
Number of candidate source rpms: 13606 Number of source rpms built in stage 4: 11959 Number of packages built in stage4 with aarch64 components: 5084 Currently building packages ascii-design-1.0.2-1.fc19.src.rpm chrony-1.29-1.fc19.src.rpm community-mysql-5.5.32-2.fc19.src.rpm dtc-1.4.0-1.fc19.src.rpm gnustep-make-2.6.5-1.fc19.src.rpm grisbi-0.8.9-3.fc19.src.rpm grub2-2.00-23.fc19.src.rpm java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.0-0.14.b89x.fc20.src.rpm libarchive-3.1.2-7.fc19.src.rpm libguac-0.7.0-5.fc19.src.rpm libtommath-0.41-16.fc19.src.rpm lpg-2.0.17-10.fc19.src.rpm mate-session-manager-1.6.1-1.fc19.src.rpm mesa-9.2-0.12.20130610.fc19.src.rpm nyquist-3.04-7b.fc19.src.rpm oat-1.6.0-7.fc19.src.rpm ocaml-bisect-1.1-5.fc19.src.rpm pacemaker-1.1.9-3.fc19.src.rpm printrun-0.0-30.20130711gitb8f549b.fc19.src.rpm python-flask-whooshee-0.0.5-2.fc19.src.rpm qca2-2.0.3-5.fc19.src.rpm qt-4.8.4-19.fc19.src.rpm qt-4.8.4-19.x1.fc19.src.rpm qtwebkit-2.3.2-1.fc19.src.rpm sane-backends-1.0.23-11.fc19.src.rpm selinux-policy-3.12.1-71.fc19.src.rpm simdock-1.2.6-1.20130128git.fc19.src.rpm sqliteman-1.2.2-9.fc19.src.rpm strongswan-5.1.0-1.fc19.src.rpm teamgit-0.0.12-1.20130626.fc19.src.rpm texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm xonotic-data-0.7.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Packages building since previous report (which might be stuck or crashed) ascii-design-1.0.2-1.fc19.src.rpm chrony-1.29-1.fc19.src.rpm community-mysql-5.5.32-2.fc19.src.rpm dtc-1.4.0-1.fc19.src.rpm gnustep-make-2.6.5-1.fc19.src.rpm grisbi-0.8.9-3.fc19.src.rpm grub2-2.00-23.fc19.src.rpm java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.0-0.14.b89x.fc20.src.rpm libguac-0.7.0-5.fc19.src.rpm libtommath-0.41-16.fc19.src.rpm lpg-2.0.17-10.fc19.src.rpm mate-session-manager-1.6.1-1.fc19.src.rpm mesa-9.2-0.12.20130610.fc19.src.rpm nyquist-3.04-7b.fc19.src.rpm oat-1.6.0-7.fc19.src.rpm pacemaker-1.1.9-3.fc19.src.rpm printrun-0.0-30.20130711gitb8f549b.fc19.src.rpm python-flask-whooshee-0.0.5-2.fc19.src.rpm qca2-2.0.3-5.fc19.src.rpm qt-4.8.4-19.fc19.src.rpm qt-4.8.4-19.x1.fc19.src.rpm qtwebkit-2.3.2-1.fc19.src.rpm sane-backends-1.0.23-11.fc19.src.rpm teamgit-0.0.12-1.20130626.fc19.src.rpm texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm xonotic-data-0.7.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Total current build failure count: 722 failed Build failures from unsatisfied dependencies: 410 failed-dep-rpms See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-dep-rpms for complete list. Build failures after dependency resolution: 312 failed-build-rpms See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-build-rpms for complete list. Naive Top 25 dependency issues 447 ghc-Cabal-devel 250 kdelibs4-devel 214 nodejs-devel 154 kdelibs4-devel >= 4.10.5 146 kdelibs4-devel >= 4.10.4 82 erlang-rebar 79 mono-devel 76 libkdegames-devel >= 4.10.5 76 libkdegames-devel >= 4.10.4 74 R-devel >= 3.0.0 56 mingw32-gcc 38 valgrind-devel 38 octave-devel 33 kdelibs-devel 31 openmpi-devel 29 nautilus-devel 28 ldc 28 gtkglext-devel 28 gdal-devel 27 prelink 27 PyQt4-devel 26 mingw32-gcc-c++ 25 netcdf-devel 24 qtwebkit-devel 24 qt-webkit-devel Previously broken builds that are now fixed: WindowMaker-0.95.4-5.fc19 bacula2-2.4.4-15.fc19 guacamole-server-0.8.2-2.fc19 mtr-0.84-2.fc19 ntl-6.0.0-1.fc19 qmidiarp-0.5.2-2.fc19 Newly attempted builds that failed: DivFix++-0.34-15.fc19 Io-language-20110912-9.fc19 dahdi-tools-2.4.1-6.fc18 dataquay-0.9-4.fc19 dmtcp-1.2.7-1.fc19 incron-0.5.10-3.fc19 liborcus-0.5.1-1.fc19 libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 ocaml-camomile-0.8.3-11.fc19 ocaml-gsl-0.6.0-17.fc19 olpc-kbdshim-29-2.fc19 open-cobol-1.1-0.20090209.fc17.2 opencv-2.4.5-1.fc19 pgadmin3-1.16.1-1.fc19 pki-core-10.0.4-2.fc19 polyml-5.5-3.fc19 pygrib-1.9.5-2.fc19 uberftp-2.6-6.fc19 xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.2-9.fc19 xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-5.fc19 xscreensaver-5.22-1.fc19 ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Re: [fedora-arm] Booting Fedora 19 on OMAP5432 uEVM board
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:34:25AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Chen Baozi wrote: > > > > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:29 AM, Jon wrote: > > > > > Hiya, > > > > > > > > > We have seen initial-setup fail the same way for other boards with > > > less memory, and assumed it's a memory pressure type problem. > > > > > > The OMAP5 uevm board contains 2 GiB of memory, and should not be > > > having this problem. > > > > > > I would suggest open a BZ for this incident. > > > > > > @Chen, > > > As a work around please mount the rootfs and change the root password > > > in the /etc/shadow file manually. > > > > Thanks, I've already done it. So everything running Fedora 19 is fine > > except this problem, :) > > > > Is that using the default Fedora kernel? If so which version? No, it isn't. I used the upstream kernel with some patches from TI branch built by myself. Interestingly, when I tried to boot dom0 under xen on OMAP5432, there is no such problem. Cheers, Baozi ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Re: [fedora-arm] Booting Fedora 19 on OMAP5432 uEVM board
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:23:24PM +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:34:25AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Chen Baozi wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:29 AM, Jon wrote: > > > > > > > Hiya, > > > > > > > > > > > > We have seen initial-setup fail the same way for other boards with > > > > less memory, and assumed it's a memory pressure type problem. > > > > > > > > The OMAP5 uevm board contains 2 GiB of memory, and should not be > > > > having this problem. > > > > > > > > I would suggest open a BZ for this incident. > > > > > > > > @Chen, > > > > As a work around please mount the rootfs and change the root password > > > > in the /etc/shadow file manually. > > > > > > Thanks, I've already done it. So everything running Fedora 19 is fine > > > except this problem, :) > > > > > > > Is that using the default Fedora kernel? If so which version? > > No, it isn't. I used the upstream kernel with some patches from TI branch > built by myself. > > Interestingly, when I tried to boot dom0 under xen on OMAP5432, there is no > such problem. Sorry, it does still have. It was just overlaped by other logs. > > Cheers, > > Baozi ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Re: [fedora-arm] Is it possible to boot Samsung Chromebook from USB 3 external hard disk?
W dniu 08.08.2013 15:11, Richard W.M. Jones pisze:
> I can't find any documentation that says that the Chromebook
> definitively cannot boot from USB 3.0 or from external HDDs. (Also it
> doesn't work when the same disk is plugged into the USB 2 port).
Once you enable USB and SD boot ("crossystem dev_boot_usb 1" or sth like
that) you are able to boot from internal eMMC (Ctrl-D) or SD (Ctrl-U) or
USB 2.0 port (also Ctrl-U). U-Boot stored in SPI flash does not have
support for USB 3.0 port.
But you can boot kernel from eMMC with rootfs on USB 3.0 hard drive.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
[fedora-arm] Daily Koji Compare Stats
Fri Aug 23 08:05:01 EDT 2013 f19-updates : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 2040 |0 |4 |2 | 77 | 4 | http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/jon/kc.f19-updates.diff.html f19-updates-testing : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 402 |0 |1 |3 | 31 | 1 | http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/jon/kc.f19-updates-testing.diff.html f18-updates : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 4050 |0 | 24 |1 | 149 | 42 | http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/jon/kc.f18-updates.diff.html f18-updates-testing : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 1796 |0 |1 |3 | 55 | 1 | http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/jon/kc.f18-updates-testing.diff.html f17-updates : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 4192 |0 | 104 |1 | 154 | 151 | http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/jon/kc.f17-updates.diff.html f17-updates-testing : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 147 |0 |2 |0 | 35 | 2 | http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/jon/kc.f17-updates-testing.diff.html ARM Build Status Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora17_rawhide Fri Aug 23 08:11:39 EDT 2013 ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
