Re: [fedora-arm] trimslice build tf101?
If you can find instructions for getting any version of any distro running on the TF101, you can run any distro on it. You just have to use whatever kernel somebody got working on the device with your prefered distro userspace. I have many machines running that way. On 10/20/2013 06:10 PM, Brian Kosick wrote: Please forgive me if I'm incorrect about this, I'm a N00b with arm devices. It looks like the tf101 does support device tree. Here's a link to cyanogenmod device tree code for it https://github.com/RaymanFX/device_asus_tf101 There are reports of getting ubuntu running on a tf101 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices/tf101 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2168473 I'm willing to do legwork, can I virtualize a specific arm device? I've done stints as build manager at my place of employment and have setup and maintain a koji build farm and bodhi instance at my place of employment. I just need to bootstrap my brain into the arm world view It seems to me that device tree is arms answer to a bios/post. As in here's a list of devices/chipsets I know about on this device. On Oct 20, 2013 5:59 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I have an aging Asus tf101 with the detachable keyboard and am getting fairly tired of the android app ecosystem. I was wondering since the trimslice and the tf101 both share the tegra 2 chipset if anyone had tried it on this device yet? and if so could share their expereince? I'm not aware of anyone who's got it working. There's a few things we'd need to be able to support it well (this goes for pretty much any device by any SoC manufacturer) and those are: - Unlocked boot loader with device tree support - In kernel device tree Unfortunately most of the current older devices don't support device tree which is a necessity for OOTB support on Fedora these days. Any tegra based device that runs a kernel newer than 3.7 should have this as all the non DT support for tegra platforms was ripped out in that release. The tegra2 support is pretty reasonable now with basic video support and will get better as the upstream driver code makes it to a stable and usable driver. Peter ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Re: [fedora-arm] u-boot update testing
2013/10/21 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I have proposed https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uboot-tools-2013.10-2.fc20 as a blocker for beta I would appreciate as many people testing it as possible and providing karma in bodhi, thanks. Do you have a minimal image to test on Wandboard quad with this updated u-boot? So something closer to Beta than TC2 since TC5 isn't booting for me. Just to share a reference http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mrunge/Wandboard_quad I've tested the previous build on my AC100 and it worked (despite it's still missing keyboard support in uboot upstream). Thx Nicolas (kwizart) ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
Re: [fedora-arm] Fwd: Does clock_gettime support CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM and CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM?
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:38:17 +0100 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dan, I suspect this is one for Jon/Kyle or others but looking through kernel bits and patches it seems that these features are completely agnostic to HW and in fact the patches [1] seem to have come from the ARM community from Android Alarm Timers [2]. One thing I would check is if on the particular platform being tested against has a RTC registered. We build a few RTCs into the kernel and dozens of other less common ones as modules. I think https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/518 will be for Kyle, likely we will need a backport to Fedora kernels Dan Peter [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/19/553 [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/429925/ On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: forwarding a message from our Ruby maintainer asking for help looks like a kernel problem, please see also https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9008#note-3 Dan Původní zpráva Předmět:Does clock_gettime support CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM and CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM? Datum: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:48:01 +0200 Od: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com Komu: arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, I am trying to build Ruby 2.1 for F21 and I observe following test errors: 3) Error: TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants: Errno::E524: Unknown error 524 - clock_getres /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1752:in `clock_getres' /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1752:in `block in test_clock_getres_constants' /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1749:in `each' /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1749:in `test_clock_getres_constants' 4) Error: TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants: Errno::E524: Unknown error 524 - clock_gettime /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1676:in `clock_gettime' /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1676:in `block in test_clock_gettime_constants' /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1673:in `each' /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-2.1.0-preview1/test/ruby/test_process.rb:1673:in `test_clock_gettime_constants' It looks like CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM and CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM are not supported, but the error code is completely strange to me. According to the documentation, it should return EINVAL. http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/clock_getres.html | | [EINVAL] | The clock_id argument does not specify a known clock. Any help is appreciated. Thanks Vít P.S. This is my upstream report: http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9008 P.S.2 I am not subscribed to this list, please keep me in the CC. ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
