Re: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-15 Thread Robert A. Book
> > Koushik Sekhar wrote:
> > 
> > Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans are not objecting to tax
> > cuts (such as dividend tax cuts) that will only favour the top
> > percentiles of the wealthy ?

Bryan Caplan wrote:
> Among other things, this assumes that people's views on tax policy are
> driven by self-interest.  Most of the empirical evidence finds that this
> is false.  For a good summary, see Sears and Funk's chapter in Jane
> Mansbridge, ed., *Beyond Self-Interest*.


Bryan,

Could we rephrase that as, "Americans are not as selfish as Democrats
would like them to be?"  ;-)

Keep in mind that a huge percentage of Americans own stock.  I don't
know the latest figures, but it's at least a third, maybe a half.
Certainly not just the "top percentiles of the wealthy."

As others have pointed out, dividend tax cuts may not favor the
wealthy at all.  Lots of older people (including my grandmother) are
not rich, but live off the dividends from stocks they or their spouses
got from their employers decades ago.  (Putting aside the
advisability of holding stock in one's own employer... .)

Generally speaking, the richer you are, the more you will prefer
capital gains rather than other income, since the gap between the
capital gains tax rate and the regular income tax rate is larger.
Since rich people are more likely than others to sit on corporate
boards of directors that determine dividends, this may results in
dividends being too low for ordinary (non-rich) shareholders.

On other words, taxing dividends more than capital gains makes rich
people transfer wealth from my grandmother to her broker (if she has
to sell stock, and therefore pay a commission, to get her money).

--Robert







RE: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread Warnick, Walt
Despite what you may read in the press, the overall effect of the
President's previous round of tax cuts was to make the tax system more
progressive, not less progressive.  In other words, those with high incomes
end up contributing a higher percentage of tax revenues after the cuts than
they did before the cuts.

Regarding the current round of tax cuts, I would like to see an analysis of
the expected net effect on progressivity (not that I am advocate for
progressivity).  While some provisions make the system more progressive,
others make it less progressive, but what is the net effect on
progressivity?

Walt Warnick  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tax cuts and US citizen responses



In a message dated 1/13/03 7:33:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans are not objecting to tax cuts 
(such as dividend tax cuts) that will only favour the top percentiles of the

wealthy ? 



Koushik

 >>

In absolute terms, the tax cut would favor those with higher incomes (rather

than "the wealthy") because those with higher incomes pay much larger 
absolute amounts of actual taxes.  The top half of the income distribution
in 
the US pays almost 100% of the taxes.  If the government cuts the amount by 
which it taxes everyone by the lesser of his or her actual tax and, say 
$1,000 to simplify, the people paying $1,000 and above will obviously get 
much larger tax cuts than those paying less than $1,000.  

Proprotionally, however, everyone playing $1,000 or less gets a larger 
percentage tax cut (100%) than everyone paying more than $1,000.  Someone 
paying $100,000 a year gets only a 1% tax cut.  With my low income--let's
say 
I'd have to pay $200 in tax otherwise--I get a 100% tax cut, which pays for 
weeks of groceries for me, I don't care that someone who pays $100,000 in 
taxes get times as large a tax cut as I do.  Someone might say, "hey, the 
rich got a tax cut five times as large as yours" to try to get me angry, but

meanwhile I get my100% tax cut and buy my groceries.  I'm reasonably happy.

If I compare  myself at all with the person paying $99,000, I'm envious not 
of his or her 1% tax cut, but of his or her ability to earn so much income 
that he pays more in taxes than I earn in income.  As a CPA tax-professional

at the now-imfamous Arthur Andersen back in the 1980s I often prepared tax 
returns for clients who paid more in taxes than I earned in salary.  :)

David Levenstam




Re: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread Bryan D Caplan
> Koushik Sekhar wrote:
> 
> Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans are not objecting to tax
> cuts (such as dividend tax cuts) that will only favour the top
> percentiles of the wealthy ?

Among other things, this assumes that people's views on tax policy are
driven by self-interest.  Most of the empirical evidence finds that this
is false.  For a good summary, see Sears and Funk's chapter in Jane
Mansbridge, ed., *Beyond Self-Interest*.

> 
> Koushik
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Prof. Bryan Caplan
   Department of Economics  George Mason University
http://www.bcaplan.com  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 Mr. Banks: Will you be good enough to explain all this?! 

 Mary Poppins: First of all I would like to make one thing 
   perfectly clear. 

 Banks: Yes? 

 Poppins: I never explain *anything*. 

*Mary Poppins*




Re: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread Anton Sherwood
Koushik Sekhar wrote:

Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans are not objecting to tax 
cuts (such as dividend tax cuts) that will only favour the top 
percentiles of the wealthy ?

Perhaps because they recognize that to be cut the tax had to have been 
imposed in the first place, and they don't think it vital to lay special 
taxes on the wealthy.  Or perhaps they've bought into the Republican 
line that tax cuts for the rich (let's face it, the left will paint 
*any* change in tax policy that doesn't make it more punitive^W 
progressive as "a handout to the rich") make us all richer in the long run.

--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/




RE: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread Gray, Lynn



Perhaps some feel the double taxation of corporate profits is 
inherently unfair. At least that is my feeling on the 
matter.
 
Lynn

  -Original Message-From: Koushik Sekhar 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:04 
  AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Tax cuts and US citizen 
  responses
  Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans 
  are not objecting to tax cuts (such as dividend tax 
  cuts) that will only favour the top percentiles of the wealthy ? 
  
   
   
  Koushik
   
   
   


Re: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread Fred Foldvary
> Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans are not objecting to tax cuts
> (such as dividend tax cuts) that will only favour the top percentiles of
> the wealthy ? 
> Koushik

Dividend tax cuts also favor retired folk whose income comes from dividends
and interest.

Some ordinary Americans also recognize the unfairness of taxing corporate
profits twice.  They also favor that corporations will borrow less and be
less vulnerable to a collapse.  They also think that paying more dividends
will make give the shareholder more of the profits and make the company
less vulnerable to looting by the directors and executives.  Some believe
that lower marginal tax rates will lead to more investment.

Fred Foldvary

=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread AdmrlLocke

In a message dated 1/13/03 7:33:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans are not objecting to tax cuts 
(such as dividend tax cuts) that will only favour the top percentiles of the 
wealthy ? 



Koushik

 >>

In absolute terms, the tax cut would favor those with higher incomes (rather 
than "the wealthy") because those with higher incomes pay much larger 
absolute amounts of actual taxes.  The top half of the income distribution in 
the US pays almost 100% of the taxes.  If the government cuts the amount by 
which it taxes everyone by the lesser of his or her actual tax and, say 
$1,000 to simplify, the people paying $1,000 and above will obviously get 
much larger tax cuts than those paying less than $1,000.  

Proprotionally, however, everyone playing $1,000 or less gets a larger 
percentage tax cut (100%) than everyone paying more than $1,000.  Someone 
paying $100,000 a year gets only a 1% tax cut.  With my low income--let's say 
I'd have to pay $200 in tax otherwise--I get a 100% tax cut, which pays for 
weeks of groceries for me, I don't care that someone who pays $100,000 in 
taxes get times as large a tax cut as I do.  Someone might say, "hey, the 
rich got a tax cut five times as large as yours" to try to get me angry, but 
meanwhile I get my100% tax cut and buy my groceries.  I'm reasonably happy.  
If I compare  myself at all with the person paying $99,000, I'm envious not 
of his or her 1% tax cut, but of his or her ability to earn so much income 
that he pays more in taxes than I earn in income.  As a CPA tax-professional 
at the now-imfamous Arthur Andersen back in the 1980s I often prepared tax 
returns for clients who paid more in taxes than I earned in salary.  :)

David Levenstam




Tax cuts and US citizen responses

2003-01-13 Thread Koushik Sekhar



Can anyone explain why ordinary Americans 
are not objecting to tax cuts (such as dividend tax 
cuts) that will only favour the top percentiles of the wealthy ? 

 
 
Koushik