Re: Krugman on Rep and Dem virtue

2004-11-06 Thread Robert A. Book
 Oh, I see that Mass doesn't have even one Republican county!

 I likewise see that Oklahoma (where the wind goes sweeping down the lane) and
 Utah don't have even one Democratic county.

 David



You could use the percentage vote for each candidate in each county in
those states.  Actually it would probably be better to use that for
every state.

--Robert


Re: Krugman on Rep and Dem virtue

2004-11-05 Thread Jason DeBacker
Those guys are Marginal Revolution already got to that Economist article:
http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2004/05/iq_hoax.html

Also, I was thinking of an endogeneity problem here.  If you are in a state with
lots of marital and family value type problems, you are more likely to support
the republican platform that claims to solve these.  If you are in
Massachusetts, you are less likely to know someone affected by these problems
and thus have little reason to put much weight on that when choosing a
candidate.

Regards,
Jason

Quoting William Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Actually, the Economist ran an article a while back suggesting a strong
 correlation between the average IQ in a state and the fraction  voting
 for Gore in 2000. Higher IQ people are more likely to marry and less
 likely to divorce. They are also less likely to have kids out of
 wedlock. Perhaps this explains what you are finding? - - Bill Dickens

  Jason DeBacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/05/04 06:21PM 
 This doesn't agree with my prior, but a quick search turned up this:
 http://www.divorcereform.org/94staterates.html  Where 12 of the top 14
 states
 in
 terms of low divorce rates were blue in 2000 and 2004 (with the
 exception of
 Iowa, this year)-- and 26 of the bottom 28 were red in 2000 and 2004
 (with the
 exception of New Mexico).

 I don't know if it will explain away all the difference, but you can't
 get
 divorced unless you are married, and those that are married are more
 likely to
 be Republican.  Also, if you have a child, you are more likely to be a
 Republican and if you have an out of wedlock birth, you have a child
 (and you
 didn't have an abortion).

 Older people are also more likely to be Republican, increasing the time
 and
 thus
 the chances of having a marital problem or a unexpected pregnancy, as
 long as
 the probability of either is not zero for Republicans.

 So the propensity of Democrats to get divorced or have an out of
 wedlock birth
 may be higher when you control for time married, age, and whether or
 not you
 have had a child.

 Both divorce and out of wedlock childern are correlated with low
 income, I'd
 guess.  Does anyone know if Democrats have higher incomes that
 Republicans once
 you control for age, race, religion, etc?

 Regards,
 Jason