Re: [ARMedslack] U-Boot + UbiFS
> does anybody know if U_Boot already supports loading the kernel of a UbiFS > partition? I've built U-Boot 2010.09 for an Atmel board and I've seen that > there are some ubi sources included but the U-Boot binary does not offer any > ubi related commands. For u-boot it seems that there are a lot of other trees around with vendor specific stuff and other features people have needed, and that eventually these patches get back to the root. You'd need to ask on the u-boot mailing list. -- Stuart Winter Slackware ARM: www.armedslack.org ___ ARMedslack mailing list ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
Re: [ARMedslack] U-Boot + UbiFS
I believe Jeff Doozan uboot is capable of doing this. http://jeff.doozan.com/debian/uboot/ Rich Lapointe On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Stuart Winter wrote: > > > > does anybody know if U_Boot already supports loading the kernel of a > UbiFS > > partition? I've built U-Boot 2010.09 for an Atmel board and I've seen > that > > there are some ubi sources included but the U-Boot binary does not offer > any > > ubi related commands. > > > For u-boot it seems that there are a lot of other trees around with vendor > specific stuff and other features people have needed, and that eventually > these patches get back to the root. > > You'd need to ask on the u-boot mailing list. > > -- > Stuart Winter > Slackware ARM: www.armedslack.org > ___ > ARMedslack mailing list > ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org > http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack > ___ ARMedslack mailing list ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
Re: [ARMedslack] U-Boot + UbiFS
Am Wednesday 16 February 2011 16:37:47 schrieb Stuart Winter: > > does anybody know if U_Boot already supports loading the kernel of a > > UbiFS partition? I've built U-Boot 2010.09 for an Atmel board and I've > > seen that there are some ubi sources included but the U-Boot binary does > > not offer any ubi related commands. > > For u-boot it seems that there are a lot of other trees around with vendor > specific stuff and other features people have needed, and that eventually > these patches get back to the root. > > You'd need to ask on the u-boot mailing list. OK, if it is for interest for anyone else. Here is the answer I got on the u-boot ML: > This means you have not yet activated > > #define CONFIG_CMD_UBI > #define CONFIG_CMD_UBIFS > > in your configuration file (and CONFIG_YAFFS2 as well for yaffs). And as far as I know the right file to add these includes is include/config.h in the u-boot sources. I could build u-boot 2010.09 with YAFFS2 support (not yet tested), it failed to build with UBIFS support. Greetings Thorsten ___ ARMedslack mailing list ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
