Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
I dont think remuneration would ever be an issue...ARR isnt that kind of a person AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when compared to Money etc ". *I couldnt understand how did he accept to compose for Ah Aah and New. * Newayz i'm hoping that he would work with Radhamohan sir who has given some really wonderful movies like Mozhi, Azhagiya Theeye or Priya.V who did movies like Kanda Naal Mudhal. Sathyananthikaad is one person in malayalam who understands the importance of music in films, however he is a Raja sir Loyalist...doubt if he wld ever work with ARR. Regards, Ganesh On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:30 AM, kishore parayath <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Read my above post...And reply...Y no response?? > >
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
Read my above post...And reply...Y no response??
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
Hi Thulsi, As far as malayalm is concerned,I dont think subject as an issue for ARR.He will get 100s of subjects which will sound 100% better than any JTYJ,Sivaji,GodFather,ATM.But time may be constraint. And to All(especially to Anish and Vijay Iyer), An updation - an avg malayalam movie will cost 2 to 3 Crores..if its of Super Star's then it will be in between 4-5 crores. :) Thanks. --- On Sat, 8/30/08, Thulasi Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Thulasi Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, August 30, 2008, 11:04 AM ARR explicitly stated during ada interview that he signed for JTYJN and ada to make everyone understand that he will be part of low budget movies too.. its just the subject and time issues that play the major role... whatever ARR gets for his music he totally deserves it.. infact, even more On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:16 AM, aneeshksasi wrote: Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
ARR explicitly stated during ada interview that he signed for JTYJN and ada to make everyone understand that he will be part of low budget movies too.. its just the subject and time issues that play the major role... whatever ARR gets for his music he totally deserves it.. infact, even more On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:16 AM, aneeshksasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hai all, > > I want to mention especially about > malayalam movies > > AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie > industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right > for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without > considering subject of the movie and particular industry. > > Regards > > ANEESH > > >
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies?
dEAR FRIENDS, i CAN't understand what you people says . Let me remind you that i am a new member in tyhis group and i don't know whether this topic has discussed or not.I have just raised my doubt . Regards ANEESH --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Srini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Srini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies? To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:51 PM Bro, Don't mean to be rude but I think its a personal thing which should NOT be discussed in this group. Cheers, Srini On Aug 27, 2008, at 11:16 PM, aneeshksasi wrote: Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies?
Oh ma... you've started to remind of one character played by Parash Rawal with a question mark on his forehead... he just keeps popping questions after questions after questions... " The search is more important than the destination " - a r rahman - --- On Wed, 27/8/08, aneeshksasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: aneeshksasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies? To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, 27 August, 2008, 8:46 PM Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH Recent Activity 52 New Members Visit Your Group New business? Get new customers. List your web site in Yahoo! Search. Yahoo! Groups w/ John McEnroe Join the All-Bran Day 10 Club. Discover photos and scrapbooking groups in the Familyographer Zone . Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
to thinshan, hi man, rahman is composing, i know whether they(directors) can wait or not..they know how to manage time..they r not making serial episodes right? Illayaraja is composing for malaylam movies, u knows that, right? There are good directors who prepares movie with enough time concentrating on story, perfect casting and songs and if rahman is available for them, i know we can expect some good movies(which rahman really misses now a days here in south) with good songs not like what v r getting from Tamil or Telugu.. By the by i dont know how less bugdet is affecting composing time. Movies may be with small budget.But they will take enough time for all the background processes..dont think that bcoz of low budget it will be something like fast food. Malayalam movies doesnt have that much market.thats it. --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Thineshan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Thineshan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 10:03 PM Even I watched/read that interview. he did say budget is the problem when questioned why he doesnt compose for small profile films. but the reason why he said that is because in small budget films, there is not enough time to work. the movie is completed really fast which doesnt give him time to compose. that was why he said budget was the problem not because he gets less money from it. and yes, his orchestrations are costly because he pays instrumentalists a lot of money (he paid 2500 rs for an instrument that costed 25 rs). all these years, i only heard in one interview where he said he does a lot of ads (airtel, world space) so that he can fund his KM music conservatory (that too for a good cause). dont quote interviews in parts to support ur claim. --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, jemsheed wrote: > > I cant agree with vithur, > > I remember in an interview(Malayalam channel only) the same qn > raised.He replied as budget is the problem..of course money > matters..his orchestra may be costly.. > > No probs :) > > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies > To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com > Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:55 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont agree bro.. > > There are many other movies like Anthimantharai for which AR didnt take any payment. > > AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when compared to Money etc ". > > Even for ratchagan, it was the Director who was pressing AR to accept the money first, but AR was telling him " Why are you always bothered about money ?? " > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, aneeshksasi wrote: > > > > > > > > Hai all, > > I want to mention especially about > malayalam movies > > AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie > industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right > > for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without > considering subject of the movie and particular industry. > > Regards > > ANEESH > > > > > -- > regards, > Vithur > > > ARR -- The Sweet Cube always >
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
Even I watched/read that interview. he did say budget is the problem when questioned why he doesnt compose for small profile films. but the reason why he said that is because in small budget films, there is not enough time to work. the movie is completed really fast which doesnt give him time to compose. that was why he said budget was the problem not because he gets less money from it. and yes, his orchestrations are costly because he pays instrumentalists a lot of money (he paid 2500 rs for an instrument that costed 25 rs). all these years, i only heard in one interview where he said he does a lot of ads (airtel, world space) so that he can fund his KM music conservatory (that too for a good cause). dont quote interviews in parts to support ur claim. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, jemsheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I cant agree with vithur, > > I remember in an interview(Malayalam channel only) the same qn > raised.He replied as budget is the problem..of course money > matters..his orchestra may be costly.. > > No probs :) > > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:55 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont agree bro.. > > There are many other movies like Anthimantharai for which AR didnt take any payment. > > AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when compared to Money etc ". > > Even for ratchagan, it was the Director who was pressing AR to accept the money first, but AR was telling him " Why are you always bothered about money ?? " > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, aneeshksasi wrote: > > > > > > > > Hai all, > > I want to mention especially about > malayalam movies > > AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie > industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right > > for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without > considering subject of the movie and particular industry. > > Regards > > ANEESH > > > > > -- > regards, > Vithur > > > ARR -- The Sweet Cube always >
RE: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies?
Ive only seen u only ask questions on ths forum ..Since u r so concernd heres a perspective.Akshay kumar charges 50crores plus and yet priyadarshan makes films wth him.Going by your logic 50 malayalam movies cn be made,.,.i suggest u stop losing sleep over these thngs and concen rate on the music buddy -- original message -- Subject:[arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies? From: "aneeshksasi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 27/08/2008 8:50 pm Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
ARR composed Dil Ne jise Apna kahan for free. You think Karan Johar cant afford 1 crore? Why cant he get ARR to compose for him then? ;) On 8/27/08, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I dont agree bro.. > > There are many other movies like Anthimantharai for which AR didnt take any > payment. > > AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when > compared to Money etc ". > > Even for ratchagan, it was the Director who was pressing AR to accept the > money first, but AR was telling him " Why are you always bothered about > money ?? " > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, aneeshksasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> Hai all, >> >> I want to mention especially about >> malayalam movies >> >> AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie >> industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right >> for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without >> considering subject of the movie and particular industry. >> >> Regards >> >> ANEESH >> >> > > > -- > regards, > Vithur > > ARR -- The Sweet Cube always > > > >
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
I cant agree with vithur, I remember in an interview(Malayalam channel only) the same qn raised.He replied as budget is the problem..of course money matters..his orchestra may be costly.. No probs :) --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:55 PM I dont agree bro.. There are many other movies like Anthimantharai for which AR didnt take any payment. AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when compared to Money etc ". Even for ratchagan, it was the Director who was pressing AR to accept the money first, but AR was telling him " Why are you always bothered about money ?? " On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, aneeshksasi wrote: Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH -- regards, Vithur ARR -- The Sweet Cube always
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
>> Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. << Dear Aneesh Bro.. There 's a limit.. This is ARR fans forum.. OFFICIAL ! Please use the words without hurting anyone... :-( 'Offense' meant ! :-( -- Krish.. His Music ~ My Mother Tongue --- On Wed, 27/8/08, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, 27 August, 2008, 8:55 PM I dont agree bro.. There are many other movies like Anthimantharai for which AR didnt take any payment. AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when compared to Money etc ". Even for ratchagan, it was the Director who was pressing AR to accept the money first, but AR was telling him " Why are you always bothered about money ?? " On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, aneeshksasi wrote: Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH -- regards, Vithur ARR -- The Sweet Cube always Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
I dont agree bro.. There are many other movies like Anthimantharai for which AR didnt take any payment. AR always has said that " The script comes in high priority for him, when compared to Money etc ". Even for ratchagan, it was the Director who was pressing AR to accept the money first, but AR was telling him " Why are you always bothered about money ?? " On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, aneeshksasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hai all, > > I want to mention especially about > malayalam movies > > AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie > industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right > for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without > considering subject of the movie and particular industry. > > Regards > > ANEESH > > > -- regards, Vithur ARR -- The Sweet Cube always
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies
Who told you that Rahman is not doing other regional language movies due to his remuneration? If you get or/and provide any confirmed sources telling such things against Rahman then only blame Rahman. Arijit On 27/08/2008, aneeshksasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hai all, > > I want to mention especially about > malayalam movies > > AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie > industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right > for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without > considering subject of the movie and particular industry. > > Regards > > ANEESH > > >
Re: [arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies?
Bro, Don't mean to be rude but I think its a personal thing which should NOT be discussed in this group. Cheers, Srini On Aug 27, 2008, at 11:16 PM, aneeshksasi wrote: Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH
[arr] Is Rahman's remuneration a problem forGood& Low Budgeted Movies?
Hai all, I want to mention especially about malayalam movies AR'S remuneration is around 1 crore / movie .But in malayalam movie industry whole cost of one movie will end around this cost, Is it right for Rahman that he should stick on to his remuneration without considering subject of the movie and particular industry. Regards ANEESH
