Re: [arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target on your back

2009-01-30 Thread Ashwin Kamath
Implying that ghazals are the only true form of music is very arrogant. I 
believe Jagjit Singh is just another opportunist having his 15 secs of fame in 
bashing Slumdog. Very obviously he has not heard the full umbrella of Rahman's 
compositions and expecting Rahman to cater to his genre is very demanding. 
Nobody asks Jagjit Singh to come out with a Carnatic, Rock or Hip Hop number. 
His main forte is ghazals and we dont demand him change, expecting Rahman to 
compose for every genre in the world overriding the theme in the movie is not 
practical. Glad to see Aadesh Srivastav and Alka Yagnik defending Rahman with 
valid points





From: Chord purev...@yahoo.com
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, 30 January, 2009 7:17:12 AM
Subject: [arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target on your 
back


If happens everywhere.  It's the nature of the beast.  Jealousy, envy,
whatever it is.  When you're the top of the game, THE top, you will
have shots coming your way. It is to be expected.

Rahman is the best.  He is receiving lots of attention, praise, etc. 
The comments by Mr. Singh to me are not surprising given that I knew
that one of these days, someone would open their mouth and say
something negative about ARR.  It was bound to happen.  And it WILL
probably happen again.  Someone will speak to the media and say
something sarcastic, or negative about Rahman, similar to what Ismail
Darbar said about Rahman a few years ago. 

What bothered me about Mr. Singh's comments is that even if he didn't
mean to attack Rahman himself, the way his comments came out sounded
very accusatory and insulting, essentially saying, What Rahman has
accomplished is really not that great given that he has not composed
ghazals since ghazals are the ultimate and superior form of music. 
His tone was arrogant and of superiority.  Why couldn't he have just
said I would love for Rahman to compose ghazals since films today
don't have a lot of them.  Rahman is talented and versatile enough to
compose ghazals.  It is obvious that Mr. Singh has issues related to
anger and bitterness over his life and the fact that he is not getting
many film assignments.  A person of his age and stature shouldn't be
making such impulsive and blunt remarks.  I would expect that from a
junior artist or someone much younger. 

When people make such comments about how Rahman uses only Western
tunes, did they ever hear his soundtracks such as Water, Earth,
Lagaan, Bose?  What about songs like Piya Ho, Naina Neer, Na Shiqua
Hota, Mujphe Toofan, Sarfarosh Ki Tamanna, Desh Ki Mitti, Ghooparani,
Tere Bina, etc. etc.?  You would get the feeling that they think that
Rahman only composes songs like Pappu all the time!! 




  Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to 
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/

[arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target on your back

2009-01-29 Thread Chord
If happens everywhere.  It's the nature of the beast.  Jealousy, envy,
whatever it is.  When you're the top of the game, THE top, you will
have shots coming your way. It is to be expected.

Rahman is the best.  He is receiving lots of attention, praise, etc. 
The comments by Mr. Singh to me are not surprising given that I knew
that one of these days, someone would open their mouth and say
something negative about ARR.  It was bound to happen.  And it WILL
probably happen again.  Someone will speak to the media and say
something sarcastic, or negative about Rahman, similar to what Ismail
Darbar said about Rahman a few years ago.  

What bothered me about Mr. Singh's comments is that even if he didn't
mean to attack Rahman himself, the way his comments came out sounded
very accusatory and insulting, essentially saying, What Rahman has
accomplished is really not that great given that he has not composed
ghazals since ghazals are the ultimate and superior form of music. 
His tone was arrogant and of superiority.  Why couldn't he have just
said I would love for Rahman to compose ghazals since films today
don't have a lot of them.  Rahman is talented and versatile enough to
compose ghazals.  It is obvious that Mr. Singh has issues related to
anger and bitterness over his life and the fact that he is not getting
many film assignments.  A person of his age and stature shouldn't be
making such impulsive and blunt remarks.  I would expect that from a
junior artist or someone much younger.  

When people make such comments about how Rahman uses only Western
tunes, did they ever hear his soundtracks such as Water, Earth,
Lagaan, Bose?  What about songs like Piya Ho, Naina Neer, Na Shiqua
Hota, Mujphe Toofan, Sarfarosh Ki Tamanna, Desh Ki Mitti, Ghooparani,
Tere Bina, etc. etc.?  You would get the feeling that they think that
Rahman only composes songs like Pappu all the time!! 



Re: [arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target on your back

2009-01-29 Thread karthik subramanian
Well said. Reminds me of a dialogue from GURU ' Jab log tumhare baare mein bura 
bolna shuru karein, to samajh lo ki tum aage badh rahe ho...

 




From: Chord purev...@yahoo.com
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 7:17:12 AM
Subject: [arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target on your 
back


If happens everywhere. It's the nature of the beast. Jealousy, envy,
whatever it is. When you're the top of the game, THE top, you will
have shots coming your way. It is to be expected.

Rahman is the best. He is receiving lots of attention, praise, etc. 
The comments by Mr. Singh to me are not surprising given that I knew
that one of these days, someone would open their mouth and say
something negative about ARR. It was bound to happen. And it WILL
probably happen again. Someone will speak to the media and say
something sarcastic, or negative about Rahman, similar to what Ismail
Darbar said about Rahman a few years ago. 

What bothered me about Mr. Singh's comments is that even if he didn't
mean to attack Rahman himself, the way his comments came out sounded
very accusatory and insulting, essentially saying, What Rahman has
accomplished is really not that great given that he has not composed
ghazals since ghazals are the ultimate and superior form of music. 
His tone was arrogant and of superiority. Why couldn't he have just
said I would love for Rahman to compose ghazals since films today
don't have a lot of them. Rahman is talented and versatile enough to
compose ghazals. It is obvious that Mr. Singh has issues related to
anger and bitterness over his life and the fact that he is not getting
many film assignments. A person of his age and stature shouldn't be
making such impulsive and blunt remarks. I would expect that from a
junior artist or someone much younger. 

When people make such comments about how Rahman uses only Western
tunes, did they ever hear his soundtracks such as Water, Earth,
Lagaan, Bose? What about songs like Piya Ho, Naina Neer, Na Shiqua
Hota, Mujphe Toofan, Sarfarosh Ki Tamanna, Desh Ki Mitti, Ghooparani,
Tere Bina, etc. etc.? You would get the feeling that they think that
Rahman only composes songs like Pappu all the time!! 

 


  

Re: [arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target on your back

2009-01-29 Thread logesh kum-arr
ya
same as

when ppl talk bad at ur back, dont worry as it means u r two steps ahead of
them 



On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:45 AM, karthik subramanian 
karthik_su...@yahoo.com wrote:

   Well said. Reminds me of a dialogue from GURU ' Jab log tumhare baare
 mein bura bolna shuru karein, to samajh lo ki tum aage badh rahe ho...



  --
 *From:* Chord purev...@yahoo.com
 *To:* arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2009 7:17:12 AM
 *Subject:* [arr] When you are number one, there WILL be a bullseye target
 on your back

  If happens everywhere. It's the nature of the beast. Jealousy, envy,
 whatever it is. When you're the top of the game, THE top, you will
 have shots coming your way. It is to be expected.

 Rahman is the best. He is receiving lots of attention, praise, etc.
 The comments by Mr. Singh to me are not surprising given that I knew
 that one of these days, someone would open their mouth and say
 something negative about ARR. It was bound to happen. And it WILL
 probably happen again. Someone will speak to the media and say
 something sarcastic, or negative about Rahman, similar to what Ismail
 Darbar said about Rahman a few years ago.

 What bothered me about Mr. Singh's comments is that even if he didn't
 mean to attack Rahman himself, the way his comments came out sounded
 very accusatory and insulting, essentially saying, What Rahman has
 accomplished is really not that great given that he has not composed
 ghazals since ghazals are the ultimate and superior form of music.
 His tone was arrogant and of superiority. Why couldn't he have just
 said I would love for Rahman to compose ghazals since films today
 don't have a lot of them. Rahman is talented and versatile enough to
 compose ghazals. It is obvious that Mr. Singh has issues related to
 anger and bitterness over his life and the fact that he is not getting
 many film assignments. A person of his age and stature shouldn't be
 making such impulsive and blunt remarks. I would expect that from a
 junior artist or someone much younger.

 When people make such comments about how Rahman uses only Western
 tunes, did they ever hear his soundtracks such as Water, Earth,
 Lagaan, Bose? What about songs like Piya Ho, Naina Neer, Na Shiqua
 Hota, Mujphe Toofan, Sarfarosh Ki Tamanna, Desh Ki Mitti, Ghooparani,
 Tere Bina, etc. etc.? You would get the feeling that they think that
 Rahman only composes songs like Pappu all the time!!


  




-- 
best regrards
Logesh A