This  Year's Little Engine That Could 
Every year over  Labor Day weekend, film fans descend on the small mountain 
town of Telluride,  Colorado for the Telluride Film Festival, a fest that's 
rather like  an early Christmas morning for cinephiles. We buy our spendy 
passes  not knowing what we're going to get in return, but trusting that, for  
the most part, fest co-directors Tom Luddy and Gary  Meyer will have filled our 
festival stockings with sugarplums  rather than lumps of coal. And most of the 
time, that proves to be the  case.
But
no matter what ends up on the official schedule, there's always buzz
and speculation around what this year's "sneaks" (that is, bigger films
that haven't yet released, which aren't on the offical fest schedule)
are going to be, and often, the sneaks end up garnering a good deal of
the fest buzz. This year, the juiciest sneak by far was Slumdog Millionaire, 
Danny Boyle's
film about a young orphan growing up in the slums of Mumbai who goes on
a game show and winds up a millionaire, only to find himself arrested
for fraud because no one believes a slumdog like him could have
possibly won without cheating.
I
went into the screening of Slumdog at the Palm Theater (one of several
temporary theaters in Telluride that, like the fest headquarters called
Brigadoon, appears as if by magic every Labor Day weekend) very
uncertain about what I was going see. I've seen most of Boyle's
better-known films, and therefore had certain expectations going in
about what the tone of the film was likely to be; those expectations
were heightened when Boyle introduced the film by saying, "I should
warn you, the opening scene includes some fairly graphic torture, so if
you're squeamish ..." 
Then
the opening credits rolled, the film began, and by the time Boyle got
to the young hero's first flashback scene of a pack of young street
kids being chased by police through the streets of Mumbai, he had me.
Like pretty much everyone else who saw the film that night at
Telluride, I left the screening with the magical sense I'd had walking
out of the sneak of Juno almost exactly a year
earlier -- that undeniable feeling that I'd just seen something
special, a surprising, honest, heartwarming film with the potential to
be big. Very big. 
Working
outside the UK, as a friend of mine observed after we saw the film,
seems to have enhanced the versatile Boyle's directorial strengths,
while allowing him to reach out to a wider audience than his previous
films. With Shallow Grave (my personal favorite of the director's films up to 
now) Boyle explored the realm of a dark crime caper; Trainspotting focused on 
an urban drug addict; Sunshine delved into sci-fi and the dire need to save the 
sun; 28 Days Later brought on the zombie action (good for horror fans, not so 
much for a more general audience), and Millions (the closest Boyle's previously 
come to making a mainstream-friendly
film) was really a statement about British materialism cloaked in the
vestiges of a family film. But Boyle's films, while generally
critically well-received, haven't resonated well at the box office; 28 Days 
Later and The Beach are the only two to have cracked $50 million. 
Slumdog Millionaire,
which explores poverty, depravity, and disparity of wealth and class
while still maintaining a positive worldview and sense of hope, is
Boyle's his most broadly accessible film to date, and with it's classic
storytelling structure, it will appeal to a wider audience than many of
Boyle's previous films. It could do very well at the mainstream box
office, especially in the hands of Fox Searchlight, who passed on
financing the film but picked it up later for distrib.
And
of course, if any studio knows how to successfully market a sweet,
surprising film like Slumdog to an Oscar nom -- or better yet, Oscar
gold -- it's Searchlight, who previously did big things with 2006
Sundance acquisition Little Miss Sunshine and last year's mega-hit Juno. When 
Searchlight shelled out $10 million for Little Miss Sunshine at Sundance a 
couple years ago after a heated bidding war against a
couple of other studios, more than a few film journalists commenced
with much moaning, wailing and gnashing of teeth over the sale,
predicting the studio would never make back its investment on a film
that, they felt, would have minimal mainstream appeal. 
They were wrong, of course, as the film ended up grossing over $100 million 
world-wide. The film's directors, Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris,
proved to have the right instincts too; after struggling for a decade
to get the film made and scrapping an earlier studio deal over a
casting dispute in which the folks with the money wanted an A-list cast
to draw higher international dollars, Faris and Dayton stuck to their
guns, insisting the film should be made with their talented, if
less-than-A-list ensemble cast. Dayton and Faris held out for a private
investor, and made the film they wanted. Their instincts, too, proved
to be right in the end; the film, as it was finally made, played well
largely because no single person in the ensemble cast overpowered the
others.
While Oscar buzz and accolades were swirling around Little Miss Sunshine, 
Searchlight had another surprise hit simmering on the back burner with Juno,
which started production in February 2007, and was ready in time to
sneak at the Telluride Film Festival on Labor Day weekend. Searchlight
put its faith in director Jason Reitman, who was hot off the success of his 
freshman debut, Thank You for Smoking, to bring Diablo Cody's script -- at that 
time one of the hottest floating around Hollywood -- to life. 
Juno, much like Little Miss Sunshine,
had its detractors in the film journalism world, in spite of its
overwhelmingly strong critical reviews; more than one journo
post-Toronto thought the film's strong fest buzz was a fluke, that the
film would neither resonate with mainstream audiences nor rake in a
massive box office take, much less get any kind of awards recognition.
Fortunately for Reitman and Cody, Juno, like Sunshine the year before, had the 
Searchlight marketing team behind it, a team
that knew how to market a quirky little film to big buzz, big box
office numbers, and Oscar dreams.
Which brings us around to this year's little film backed by the Searchlight 
marketing team: Slumdog Millionaire. Like Juno, Slumdog had a sneak at 
Telluride before heading to Toronto. Last year,Juno took over Telluride, 
becoming the film that everyone there was talking about, even over the lofty 
likes of Cannes winner 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days, eventual Oscar nominee The 
Counterfeiters, andInto the Wild, which seemed to lose momentum at Telluride, 
at least in part because of all the talk swirling around Juno. The Telluride 
buzz helped Juno pop big in Toronto, and Searchlight used the same strategy 
this year with Slumdog. 
This
year, Slumdog basked in the glow of positive buzz at Telluride, and
shortly thereafter at Toronto. It's enjoying strong critical response
coming out of the fests; when I interviewed Boyle at Toronto, he was
positively buoyant, and with good reason. Slumdog is doing well, in
part, because it isn't quite what anyone expected a film set in the
slums of India to be; unlike so many depressing fest films set amidst
poverty, Slumdog is light and entertaining without being banal or
sappy, heartfelt and uplifting without feeling overly contrived. 
It's
modeled in the classically appealing hero-quest fashion, with a
handsome, good-hearted, down-trodden young lad who overcomes adversity
after adversity to succeed, win the prettiest girl, and capture the
treasure. It just happens to be set within the construct of a game
show, rather than a quest; or rather, it turns the quest on its head,
using the flashbacks in the story to show how the hero, a poor orphan
from the slums, was able to answer a series of challening questions to
win his prize. The big question is whether he will be allowed to keep
it.
Slumdog has several things in common with both Little Miss Sunshine and Juno,
in particular the originality with which the scripts put the characters
into situations we haven't seen done to death already,a light-hearted
tone standing out amidst a sea of darker, heavier films, and spot-on
casting with relative unknowns in the key roles. With Little Miss Sunshine, we 
had Abigail Breslin,
who brought a sense of innocence and reflected childhood angst an adult
audience could relate to in the role of a plain, chubby little girl who
dreams of being a beauty queen. 
With Juno, we had Ellen Page -- already noticed by some for her knockout 
performance in Hard Candy,
but hardly a household name at the time -- playing a middle-class
teenager dealing with an unexpected pregnancy by seeking the right
adoptive couple in the pages of the local Penny Saver. And with
Slumdog, we have a pair of unknown, but delightfully charming Indian
actors playing the love-story-in-the-slums roles of Jamal Malik (Dev Patel), a 
chaiwalla accused of defrauding a game show, and his paramour, Latika (Freida 
Pinto), a street orphan-turned-property-of-the-local-bad-guy, who Jamal wants 
desperately to rescue.
It
remains to be seen whether Searchlight will successfully market Slumdog
to both big box office numbers and Oscar noms, but frankly, I'd be
surprised if they don't. Like both Little Miss Sunshine and Juno,
Slumdog is the kind of film that will generate legs through positive
word-of-mouth buzz. It's a feel-good, uplifting movie at a time when
people want desperately to feel good and be uplifted; people are sick
of politics and war, they want to laugh and leave behind reality when
they go to a movie, and Slumdog will give the people what they want. Will 
Slumdog prove to be this year's Little Engine that Could? I think it can, I 
think it can, I think it can ....

http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists/voynar/2008/081020.html

Reply via email to