Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error?
One additional information: user does not even receive any error or warning. On Oct 1, 3:25 am, LJ LongWing lj.longw...@gmail.com wrote: But there is WAY too little time between the select and the rollback to have requested user feedback and have received ittalking less than a tenth of a second. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 6:01 PM To: arsl...@arslist.org Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? The snippet tells the whole story... Select C6 ... The Last Modified Date has changed from when the record was pulled at the start of the transaction. A user should have received the This record has been updated by another user since you retrieved it. error (Error 1203) and the user chose not to save the record. Fred -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:16 AM To: arsl...@arslist.org Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? With the snipit you provided, I cannot see it, but it's obvious that somewhere earlier in your process something caused the DB to issue a rollback...you just need to find the 'what' -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of koray Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:04 AM To: arsl...@arslist.org Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? Thanks for the feedback, I have had faced with a similar issue - a completely different one but identical to your example : - A script does a Push Fields to a form, but gets ARERR 382. - However, the Submit filters are executed after the operation as regular. - At the end of Phase, Canceled filter processing due to error appears. The .log file has the line /* UPDATE xxx SET ... /* /* ROLLBACK This totally seems to be okay, and supports your example. On the other hand, the current case has all queries seem to be executed successfully - ending with /* OK. So I cannot see why or which statement fails at all. BR, Koray On Sep 29, 5:57 pm, LJ LongWing lj.longw...@gmail.com wrote: Koray, You have your answer right thereor more than likely, somewhere earlier upbut the result is right there. /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK I experience this type of scenario when I issue an out of phase delete of a record that I'm updating...here is my typical scenario I want to delete a recordthe easiest way to do a delete is to push to that record and set a 'delete' field to 'yes', and have a filter on that form do a record delete if that flag is yes Well...if that filter does an out of phase delete (phase 1), when phase 2 goes through and tries to update the last mod by and last mod date on the record, that record doesn't exist, and as such, the db throws an error and causes a rollback... I don't know what your scenario is, but something in your processing is causing the db to throw and error and rollback the transaction. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of koray Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:47 AM To: arsl...@arslist.org Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? And here is the SQL .log file corresponding to the same process : /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4296 */SELECT C6 FROM T904 WHERE C1 = '1308884' /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4317 */OK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4697 */COMMIT WORK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4705 */COMMIT WORK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3386 */SELECT C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C112,... /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3738 */OK On Sep 29, 10:03 am, koray ko...@alkankoray.net wrote: Hello all, I have a weird issue that seems to be happening continously. Below is a portion from server-side filter .log file that took my attention: /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4127 */ End of filter processing (phase 1) -- Operation - SET on ZZZ - AD01589874 /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4130 */ Restart of filter processing (phase 2) -- Operation - SET on YYY - 1308884 /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4159 */ Filter Level:0 Number Of Filters:404 Checking IMSA:MAIN:TASK:Task:Get WIP Task 0: Push Fields - IMSA:MAIN:Automated Pending:Task deferred from filter IMSA:MAIN:TASK:Task:Get WIP Task /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4189 */ End of filter processing (phase 2) -- Operation - SET on YYY - 1308884 /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4710 */Canceled
WOI:WOI:CreateSetRequestor_106_Group Issue
Good morning, I've run into an error with Work Order 7.5 where if you belong to a support group that is a part of a different company, you can't submit a Work Order because your support group doesn't match up with your company. Specifically, I'm trying to use a Work Order Template that has several Tasks associated with it, and the error message comes up when the template tries to add the tasks in. I've determined that the quickest way to resolve this issue is to disable the Active Link WOI:WOI:CreateSetRequestor_106_Group, especially since those fields seem to serve no real purpose. So I come to you all to ask, am I correct in that those fields serve no purpose? I've tested with that Active Link disabled and everything seems to work correctly, but perhaps I'm missing some bigger picture thing. Thanks, Shawn Pierson Remedy Developer | Southern Union Private and confidential as detailed here: http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the link, please e-mail sender. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
WWRUG 2010: Just two weeks away!
Yes it seems like only yesterday it was months. We have an amazing schedule, Phil and Lenny have been working hard putting on the finishing touches, our Vendor Showcase has new vendors, new technology and all the technical information you need, so if you haven't decided to go yet you should. I am sure most of you have received at least one email from BMC, but in case you missed it .. Worldwide Remedy User Group http://media.cms.bmc.com/images/bmc_ext_offer_spacer.gif Join Bob Beauchamp and Doug Mueller at WWRUG10 Attend the only international gathering in the world produced by and for BMC Remedy users. The 2010 Worldwide Remedy User Group takes place October 18-22 at the Hard Rock Hotel Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Don't miss this year's keynote speaker, Bob Beauchamp, CEO of BMC Software Not only the only, but it will be the best BMC AR System/CMDB/ITSM/BSM event to date. www.wwrug10.com Rooms for after the conference are almost gone, but you can still extend your stay with the weekend before and enjoy the ambiance of the Hard Rock Hotel, and of course Las Vegas. I have to stress the before and after, because during we keep you busy dawn until dusk :-) (and if you want friends to join you, they don't have to attend our conference for the conference rate, but you need to use the link from the conference web site https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mode=welcome_ei_new https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mode=welcome_ei_neweventID=2504607 eventID=2504607). . Dan this email represents the views of me at this moment, not necessarily anyone else, or me later ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are bmc_ext_offer_spacer.gif
[no subject]
http://csimanagement.it/mor1.html ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error?
The interaction is that the user gets an ERROR indicating that there was a conflict and then they get the choice. If they say to continue, the operation is performed again. If they cancel it is not performed again. So, the time is immediate -- error on the conflict (and a rollback) and then the user gets the option to continue and override the error by applying again or to cancel. Doug -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 5:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? But there is WAY too little time between the select and the rollback to have requested user feedback and have received ittalking less than a tenth of a second. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 6:01 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? The snippet tells the whole story... Select C6 ... The Last Modified Date has changed from when the record was pulled at the start of the transaction. A user should have received the This record has been updated by another user since you retrieved it. error (Error 1203) and the user chose not to save the record. Fred -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:16 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? With the snipit you provided, I cannot see it, but it's obvious that somewhere earlier in your process something caused the DB to issue a rollback...you just need to find the 'what' -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of koray Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:04 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? Thanks for the feedback, I have had faced with a similar issue - a completely different one but identical to your example : - A script does a Push Fields to a form, but gets ARERR 382. - However, the Submit filters are executed after the operation as regular. - At the end of Phase, Canceled filter processing due to error appears. The .log file has the line /* UPDATE xxx SET ... /* /* ROLLBACK This totally seems to be okay, and supports your example. On the other hand, the current case has all queries seem to be executed successfully - ending with /* OK. So I cannot see why or which statement fails at all. BR, Koray On Sep 29, 5:57 pm, LJ LongWing lj.longw...@gmail.com wrote: Koray, You have your answer right thereor more than likely, somewhere earlier upbut the result is right there. /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK I experience this type of scenario when I issue an out of phase delete of a record that I'm updating...here is my typical scenario I want to delete a recordthe easiest way to do a delete is to push to that record and set a 'delete' field to 'yes', and have a filter on that form do a record delete if that flag is yes Well...if that filter does an out of phase delete (phase 1), when phase 2 goes through and tries to update the last mod by and last mod date on the record, that record doesn't exist, and as such, the db throws an error and causes a rollback... I don't know what your scenario is, but something in your processing is causing the db to throw and error and rollback the transaction. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of koray Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:47 AM To: arsl...@arslist.org Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error? And here is the SQL .log file corresponding to the same process : /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4296 */SELECT C6 FROM T904 WHERE C1 = '1308884' /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4317 */OK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4697 */COMMIT WORK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4705 */COMMIT WORK /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3386 */SELECT C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C112,... /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3738 */OK On Sep 29, 10:03 am, koray ko...@alkankoray.net wrote: Hello all, I have a weird issue that seems to be happening continously. Below is a portion from server-side filter .log file that took my attention: /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4127 */ End of filter processing (phase 1) -- Operation - SET on ZZZ - AD01589874 /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4130 */ Restart of filter processing (phase 2) -- Operation - SET on YYY -
Re: Table field content change Execution Option
Interesting... So you see the option? Is it right there in the Execution Options section? Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to Picasa) http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970target=ALBUMid=5523157893439853409authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwEinvite=CJ6dltEMfeat=email Jason On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng jarl.gron...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Using this: - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3) -- J 2010/9/30 Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com: ** Has anybody seen the Table field content change as an Active Link Execution Option in Dev Studio? We have an editable check box in a table field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check box is checked/unchecked. This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I don't see it as an option in Dev Studio. I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the Field:. Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03. I even tried the Admin tool for kicks. 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28 Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the following ways: - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form data is refreshed at predefined intervals - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table from the pop-up menu - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table field. This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5 release notes, when was it added?). I have run into similar situations in the past where I needed to update the data instantly when a value in an editable column changes. Any ideas? Thanks, Jason _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
CMDB 2.0 application vs. application system
What is the difference between BMC.CORE:BMC_Application and BMC.CORE:BMC_ApplicationSystem? I am looking for docs that specify the definition of each. But can't find it.. going to BMCs site now but perhaps someone out there knows TIA, Marcelo ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Table field content change Execution Option
I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature. This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5 and later (I think it was added in 7.5) releases. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. Not when an editable cell in an editable column in a table field changes. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. As the doc notes: When the table is initially loaded When the table is refreshed When the table goes to the next/previous chunk When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable column changes. You should find this feature working correctly as documented once remembering that the TABLE FIELD is the entire field the table is in not a column or an editable cell within a column. You can do table walks and there are keywords that will tell you if the content of the columns in the table row have changed (not which one if there are several editable columns, but just that something has changed in some editable column). There is no condition at this time that fires at the point of change of the value. (Although, if you use advanced tables and have things laid out and columns are shown as fields you may be able to put things like gain and loss of focus on those fields and things may work but I am not sure. If not, it would be an interesting enhancement request if I do say so myself) Anyway, this is another topic than the one of this note. I hope this helps clarify things. Doug Mueller From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Jason Miller Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:47 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Table field content change Execution Option ** Interesting... So you see the option? Is it right there in the Execution Options section? Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to Picasa) http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970target=ALBUMid=5523157893439853409authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwEinvite=CJ6dltEMfeat=email Jason On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng jarl.gron...@gmail.commailto:jarl.gron...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Using this: - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3) -- J 2010/9/30 Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.commailto:jason.mil...@gmail.com: ** Has anybody seen the Table field content change as an Active Link Execution Option in Dev Studio? We have an editable check box in a table field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check box is checked/unchecked. This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I don't see it as an option in Dev Studio. I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the Field:. Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03. I even tried the Admin tool for kicks. 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28 Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the following ways: - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form data is refreshed at predefined intervals - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table from the pop-up menu - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table field. This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5 release notes, when was it added?). I have run into similar situations in the past where I needed to update the data instantly when a value in an editable column changes. Any ideas? Thanks, Jason _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.comhttp://www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.orghttp://www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.comhttp://www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Developer Studio without any perspective
Hi, I had the same problem some days before. Be aware, that you are using the correct java version, 1.6 or newer. Tristan ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
Re: Table field content change Execution Option
Thanks as always Doug. I have a few questions. What conditions need to be met for this option to appear in Dev Studio? I have the table field selected as the Field in the AL and I have tried using the column as well. The documentation appear to contradict your statement When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable column changes with this statement When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table field. Maybe it is poorly worded or a documentation bug but to me they appear to be opposite statements. Am I still completely misunderstanding what the documentation is saying? Thanks, Jason On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mueller, Doug doug_muel...@bmc.com wrote: ** I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature. This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5 and later (I think it was added in 7.5) releases. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. Not when an editable cell in an editable column in a table field changes. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. As the doc notes: When the table is initially loaded When the table is refreshed When the table goes to the next/previous chunk When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable column changes. You should find this feature working correctly as documented once remembering that the TABLE FIELD is the entire field the table is in not a column or an editable cell within a column. You can do table walks and there are keywords that will tell you if the content of the columns in the table row have changed (not which one if there are several editable columns, but just that something has changed in some editable column). There is no condition at this time that fires at the point of change of the value. (Although, if you use advanced tables and have things laid out and columns are shown as fields you may be able to put things like gain and loss of focus on those fields and things may work but I am not sure. If not, it would be an interesting enhancement request if I do say so myself) Anyway, this is another topic than the one of this note. I hope this helps clarify things. Doug Mueller -- *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 12:47 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Table field content change Execution Option ** Interesting... So you see the option? Is it right there in the Execution Options section? Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to Picasa) http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970target=ALBUMid=5523157893439853409authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwEinvite=CJ6dltEMfeat=email Jason On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng jarl.gron...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Using this: - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3) -- J 2010/9/30 Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com: ** Has anybody seen the Table field content change as an Active Link Execution Option in Dev Studio? We have an editable check box in a table field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check box is checked/unchecked. This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I don't see it as an option in Dev Studio. I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the Field:. Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03. I even tried the Admin tool for kicks. 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28 Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the following ways: - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form data is refreshed at predefined intervals - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table from the pop-up menu - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table field. This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5 release notes, when was it added?). I have run into similar situations in the past where I needed to update the data instantly when a value in an editable column changes. Any ideas? Thanks, Jason _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10
Re: Table field content change Execution Option
Just for giggles I opened the 7.6.03 Workflow Objects Guide and there is no reference to Table field content change like there is in the 7.5 guide (I find it 3 times, once in the Active links: Execution options for request and window actions table and twice in the Index). Jason On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks as always Doug. I have a few questions. What conditions need to be met for this option to appear in Dev Studio? I have the table field selected as the Field in the AL and I have tried using the column as well. The documentation appear to contradict your statement When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable column changeswith this statement When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table field. Maybe it is poorly worded or a documentation bug but to me they appear to be opposite statements. Am I still completely misunderstanding what the documentation is saying? Thanks, Jason On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mueller, Doug doug_muel...@bmc.comwrote: ** I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature. This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5 and later (I think it was added in 7.5) releases. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. Not when an editable cell in an editable column in a table field changes. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. As the doc notes: When the table is initially loaded When the table is refreshed When the table goes to the next/previous chunk When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable column changes. You should find this feature working correctly as documented once remembering that the TABLE FIELD is the entire field the table is in not a column or an editable cell within a column. You can do table walks and there are keywords that will tell you if the content of the columns in the table row have changed (not which one if there are several editable columns, but just that something has changed in some editable column). There is no condition at this time that fires at the point of change of the value. (Although, if you use advanced tables and have things laid out and columns are shown as fields you may be able to put things like gain and loss of focus on those fields and things may work but I am not sure. If not, it would be an interesting enhancement request if I do say so myself) Anyway, this is another topic than the one of this note. I hope this helps clarify things. Doug Mueller -- *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 12:47 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: Table field content change Execution Option ** Interesting... So you see the option? Is it right there in the Execution Options section? Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to Picasa) http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970target=ALBUMid=5523157893439853409authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwEinvite=CJ6dltEMfeat=email Jason On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng jarl.gron...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Using this: - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3) -- J 2010/9/30 Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com: ** Has anybody seen the Table field content change as an Active Link Execution Option in Dev Studio? We have an editable check box in a table field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check box is checked/unchecked. This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I don't see it as an option in Dev Studio. I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the Field:. Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03. I even tried the Admin tool for kicks. 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28 Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the following ways: - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form data is refreshed at predefined intervals - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or Refresh All from the pop-up menu - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table from the pop-up menu - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table field. This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5 release notes, when was it added?). I have run into similar
Please Delete the [ No Subject ] Email from this Account Today
All: Please pardon the spam email from this account today. The account has been secured again. Looks like my password got hacked, sigh. Perils of keeping the same email address for 10+ years, I suppose. Sorry, --Phil ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
