WOI:WOI:CreateSetRequestor_106_Group Issue

[Pierson, Shawn]

Good morning,

I've run into an error with Work Order 7.5 where if you belong to a support 
group that is a part of a different company, you can't submit a Work Order 
because your support group doesn't match up with your company.  Specifically, 
I'm trying to use a Work Order Template that has several Tasks associated with 
it, and the error message comes up when the template tries to add the tasks in. 
 I've determined that the quickest way to resolve this issue is to disable the 
Active Link WOI:WOI:CreateSetRequestor_106_Group, especially since those fields 
seem to serve no real purpose.

So I come to you all to ask, am I correct in that those fields serve no 
purpose?  I've tested with that Active Link disabled and everything seems to 
work correctly, but perhaps I'm missing some bigger picture thing.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Southern Union


Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

WWRUG 2010: Just two weeks away!

[Daniel Bloom]

Yes it seems like only yesterday it was months.
 
We have an amazing schedule, Phil and Lenny have been working hard putting
on the finishing touches,
our Vendor Showcase has new vendors, new technology and all the technical
information you need, 
so if you haven't decided to go yet you should.
 
I am sure most of you have received at least one email from BMC,
but in case you missed it ..
 

Worldwide Remedy User Group 
  

Join Bob Beauchamp and Doug Mueller at WWRUG10
Attend the only international gathering in the world produced by and for BMC
Remedy users. The 2010 Worldwide Remedy User Group takes place October 18-22
at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada.  Don't miss this
year's keynote speaker, Bob Beauchamp, CEO of BMC Software

 
Not only the only, but it will be the best BMC AR System/CMDB/ITSM/BSM event
to date.
 
www.wwrug10.com
 
Rooms for after the conference are almost gone, but you can still extend
your stay with the weekend before and enjoy the ambiance of  the Hard Rock
Hotel, and of course Las Vegas. I have to stress the before and after,
because during we keep you busy dawn until dusk :-)
 
(and if you want friends to join you, they don't have to  attend our
conference for the conference rate,
but you need to use the link from the conference web site
https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mode=welcome_ei_new

&eventID=2504607).
 
. Dan
this email represents the views of me at this moment, not necessarily anyone
else, or me later

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
<>

[no subject]

[Phil Murnane]

http://csimanagement.it/mor1.html


  

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing due to error"?

[Mueller, Doug]

The interaction is that the user gets an ERROR indicating that there was a
conflict and then they get the choice.  If they say to continue, the operation
is performed again.  If they cancel it is not performed again.

So, the time is immediate -- error on the conflict (and a rollback) and then the
user gets the option to continue and override the error by applying again
or to cancel.

Doug 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 5:26 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing due to 
error"?

But there is WAY too little time between the select and the rollback to have
requested user feedback and have received ittalking less than a tenth of
a second.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 6:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing due to
error"?

The snippet tells the whole story...   Select C6 ...

The Last Modified Date has changed from when the record was pulled at the
start of the transaction.  A user should have received the "This record has
been updated by another user since you retrieved it." error (Error 1203) and
the user chose not to save the record.

Fred

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:16 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing due to
error"?

With the snipit you provided, I cannot see it, but it's obvious that
somewhere earlier in your process something caused the DB to issue a
rollback...you just need to find the 'what'

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of koray
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:04 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing due to
error"?

Thanks for the feedback,

I have had faced with a similar issue - a completely different one but
identical to your example :
- A script does a Push Fields to a form, but gets ARERR 382.
- However, the Submit filters are executed after the operation as
regular.
- At the end of Phase, "Canceled filter processing due to error"
appears.

The .log file has the line
/* UPDATE xxx SET ...
/*
/* ROLLBACK

This totally seems to be okay, and supports your example.

On the other hand, the current case has all queries seem to be
executed successfully - ending with /* OK.

So I cannot see why or which statement fails at all.

BR,
Koray

On Sep 29, 5:57 pm, LJ LongWing  wrote:
> Koray,
> You have your answer right thereor more than likely, somewhere earlier
> upbut the result is right there.
>
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK
>
> I experience this type of scenario when I issue an out of phase delete of
a
> record that I'm updating...here is my typical scenario
>
> I want to delete a recordthe easiest way to do a delete is to push to
> that record and set a 'delete' field to 'yes', and have a filter on that
> form do a record delete if that flag is yes
>
> Well...if that filter does an out of phase delete (phase 1), when phase 2
> goes through and tries to update the last mod by and last mod date on the
> record, that record doesn't exist, and as such, the db throws an error and
> causes a rollback...
>
> I don't know what your scenario is, but something in your processing is
> causing the db to throw and error and rollback the transaction.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of koray
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:47 AM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing due
to
> error"?
>
> And here is the SQL .log file corresponding to the same process :
>
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4296 */SELECT C6 FROM T904 WHERE C1 =
> '1308884'
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4317 */OK
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4697 */COMMIT WORK
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4705 */COMMIT WORK
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3386 */SELECT
C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C112,...
> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3738 */OK
>
> On Sep 29, 10:03 am, koray  wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
> > I have a weird issue that seems to be happening continously. Below is
> > a portion from server-side filter .log file that took my attention:
>
> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4127 */     End of filter processing
(phase
> 1) -- Operation - SET on ZZZ - AD01589874
> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4130 */     Restart of filter processing
>

Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option

[Jason Miller]

Interesting...  So you see the option?  Is it right there in the Execution
Options section?

Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed
some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to
Picasa)

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970&target=ALBUM&id=5523157893439853409&authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwE&invite=CJ6dltEM&feat=email

Jason

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Using this:
>- Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh
> or Refresh All from the pop-up menu
>
> On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3)
>
> --
> J
>
> 2010/9/30 Jason Miller :
> > ** Has anybody seen the "Table field content change" as an Active Link
> > Execution Option in Dev Studio?  We have an editable check box in a table
> > field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check
> box
> > is checked/unchecked.  This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I
> > don't see it as an option in Dev Studio.
> >
> > I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the "Field:".
> > Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03.  I even tried the
> > Admin tool for kicks.
> >
> > 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28
> > Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the
> following
> > ways:
> > - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form
> data
> > is refreshed at predefined intervals
> > - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or
> > Refresh All from the pop-up menu
> > - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the
> > user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu
> > - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table
> > from the pop-up menu
> > - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table
> > field.
> >
> > This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5
> > release notes, when was it added?).  I have run into similar situations
> in
> > the past where I needed to update the data instantly when a value in an
> > editable column changes.  Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> > _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

CMDB 2.0 application vs. application system

[Martinez, Marcelo A]

What is the difference between BMC.CORE:BMC_Application and 
BMC.CORE:BMC_ApplicationSystem?

I am looking for docs that specify the definition of each. But can't find it.. 
going to BMCs site now but perhaps someone out there knows

TIA,
Marcelo

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option

[Mueller, Doug]

I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature.

This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5 and 
later (I think it was added in 7.5)
releases.

It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes.  Not when an editable cell in an 
editable column in a table field
changes.  It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes.

As the doc notes:

When the table is initially loaded
When the table is refreshed
When the table goes to the next/previous chunk

When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable column 
changes.

You should find this feature working correctly as documented once remembering 
that the TABLE FIELD is
the entire field the table is in not a column or an editable cell within a 
column.


You can do table walks and there are keywords that will tell you if the content 
of the columns in the table
row have changed (not which one if there are several editable columns, but just 
that something has
changed in some editable column).  There is no condition at this time that 
fires at the point of change of
the value.

(Although, if you use advanced tables and have things laid out and columns are 
shown as fields you may be
able to put things like gain and loss of focus on those fields and things may 
work  but I am not sure.  If
not, it would be an interesting enhancement request if I do say so myself)

Anyway, this is another topic than the one of this note.

I hope this helps clarify things.

Doug Mueller


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:47 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option

** Interesting...  So you see the option?  Is it right there in the Execution 
Options section?

Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed 
some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to 
Picasa)

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970&target=ALBUM&id=5523157893439853409&authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwE&invite=CJ6dltEM&feat=email

Jason

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng 
mailto:jarl.gron...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Using this:
  - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh
or Refresh All from the pop-up menu

On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3)

--
J

2010/9/30 Jason Miller mailto:jason.mil...@gmail.com>>:
> ** Has anybody seen the "Table field content change" as an Active Link
> Execution Option in Dev Studio?  We have an editable check box in a table
> field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check box
> is checked/unchecked.  This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I
> don't see it as an option in Dev Studio.
>
> I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the "Field:".
> Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03.  I even tried the
> Admin tool for kicks.
>
> 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28
> Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the following
> ways:
> - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form data
> is refreshed at predefined intervals
> - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh or
> Refresh All from the pop-up menu
> - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the
> user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu
> - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table
> from the pop-up menu
> - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table
> field.
>
> This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5
> release notes, when was it added?).  I have run into similar situations in
> the past where I needed to update the data instantly when a value in an
> editable column changes.  Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the 
> Answers Are"_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"

_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Re: Developer Studio without any perspective

[Tristan Roppel]

Hi,

I had the same problem some days before.
Be aware, that you are using the correct java version, 1.6 or newer.

Tristan

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option

[Jason Miller]

Thanks as always Doug.  I have a few questions.

What conditions need to be met for this option to appear in Dev Studio?  I
have the table field selected as the "Field" in the AL and I have tried
using the column as well.

The documentation appear to contradict your statement "When the table
contents change not when a column content of an editable column changes with
this statement "When the user changes the value of an editable column in the
table field".  Maybe it is poorly worded or a documentation bug but to me
they appear to be opposite statements.  Am I still completely
misunderstanding what the documentation is saying?

Thanks,
Jason

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mueller, Doug  wrote:

> **
> I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature.
>
> This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5 and
> later (I think it was added in 7.5)
> releases.
>
> It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes.  Not when an editable cell in
> an editable column in a table field
> changes.  It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes.
>
> As the doc notes:
>
> When the table is initially loaded
> When the table is refreshed
> When the table goes to the next/previous chunk
>
> When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable
> column changes.
>
> You should find this feature working correctly as documented once
> remembering that the TABLE FIELD is
> the entire field the table is in not a column or an editable cell within a
> column.
>
>
> You can do table walks and there are keywords that will tell you if the
> content of the columns in the table
> row have changed (not which one if there are several editable columns, but
> just that something has
> changed in some editable column).  There is no condition at this time that
> fires at the point of change of
> the value.
>
> (Although, if you use advanced tables and have things laid out and columns
> are shown as fields you may be
> able to put things like gain and loss of focus on those fields and things
> may work  but I am not sure.  If
> not, it would be an interesting enhancement request if I do say so
> myself)
>
> Anyway, this is another topic than the one of this note.
>
> I hope this helps clarify things.
>
> Doug Mueller
>
>  --
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller
> *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 12:47 PM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option
>
> ** Interesting...  So you see the option?  Is it right there in the
> Execution Options section?
>
>
> Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which
> posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get
> to Picasa)
>
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970&target=ALBUM&id=5523157893439853409&authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwE&invite=CJ6dltEM&feat=email
>
> Jason
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Using this:
>>   - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh
>> or Refresh All from the pop-up menu
>>
>> On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3)
>>
>> --
>> J
>>
>> 2010/9/30 Jason Miller :
>> > ** Has anybody seen the "Table field content change" as an Active Link
>>  > Execution Option in Dev Studio?  We have an editable check box in a
>> table
>> > field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the check
>> box
>> > is checked/unchecked.  This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I
>> > don't see it as an option in Dev Studio.
>> >
>> > I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the
>> "Field:".
>> > Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03.  I even tried the
>> > Admin tool for kicks.
>> >
>> > 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28
>> > Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the
>> following
>> > ways:
>> > - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form
>> data
>> > is refreshed at predefined intervals
>> > - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh
>> or
>> > Refresh All from the pop-up menu
>> > - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when the
>> > user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu
>> > - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear Table
>> > from the pop-up menu
>> > - When the user changes the value of an editable column in the table
>> > field.
>> >
>> > This sounds like a wonderful newer feature (I didn't see it in the 7.5
>> > release notes, when was it added?).  I have run into similar situations
>> in
>> > the past where I needed to update the data instantly when a value in an
>> > editable column changes.  Any ideas?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jason
>> > _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>>

Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option

[Jason Miller]

Just for giggles I opened the 7.6.03 Workflow Objects Guide and there is no
reference to "Table field content change" like there is in the 7.5 guide (I
find it 3 times, once in the "Active links: Execution options for request
and window actions" table and twice in the Index).

Jason

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jason Miller  wrote:

> Thanks as always Doug.  I have a few questions.
>
> What conditions need to be met for this option to appear in Dev Studio?  I
> have the table field selected as the "Field" in the AL and I have tried
> using the column as well.
>
> The documentation appear to contradict your statement "When the table
> contents change not when a column content of an editable column changeswith 
> this statement "When the user changes the value of an editable column
> in the table field".  Maybe it is poorly worded or a documentation bug but
> to me they appear to be opposite statements.  Am I still completely
> misunderstanding what the documentation is saying?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Mueller, Doug wrote:
>
>> **
>> I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature.
>>
>> This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5
>> and later (I think it was added in 7.5)
>> releases.
>>
>> It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes.  Not when an editable cell in
>> an editable column in a table field
>> changes.  It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes.
>>
>> As the doc notes:
>>
>> When the table is initially loaded
>> When the table is refreshed
>> When the table goes to the next/previous chunk
>>
>> When the table contents change not when a column content of an editable
>> column changes.
>>
>> You should find this feature working correctly as documented once
>> remembering that the TABLE FIELD is
>> the entire field the table is in not a column or an editable cell within a
>> column.
>>
>>
>> You can do table walks and there are keywords that will tell you if the
>> content of the columns in the table
>> row have changed (not which one if there are several editable columns, but
>> just that something has
>> changed in some editable column).  There is no condition at this time that
>> fires at the point of change of
>> the value.
>>
>> (Although, if you use advanced tables and have things laid out and columns
>> are shown as fields you may be
>> able to put things like gain and loss of focus on those fields and things
>> may work  but I am not sure.  If
>> not, it would be an interesting enhancement request if I do say so
>> myself)
>>
>> Anyway, this is another topic than the one of this note.
>>
>> I hope this helps clarify things.
>>
>> Doug Mueller
>>
>>  --
>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 12:47 PM
>> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>> *Subject:* Re: "Table field content change" Execution Option
>>
>> ** Interesting...  So you see the option?  Is it right there in the
>> Execution Options section?
>>
>>
>> Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which
>> posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get
>> to Picasa)
>>
>>
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=103809916737874607970&target=ALBUM&id=5523157893439853409&authkey=Gv1sRgCI-3itaspOORvwE&invite=CJ6dltEM&feat=email
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jarl Grøneng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Using this:
>>>   - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh
>>> or Refresh All from the pop-up menu
>>>
>>> On a 7.5p4 serve, and it works as documented. (dev studio 7.5p3)
>>>
>>> --
>>> J
>>>
>>> 2010/9/30 Jason Miller :
>>> > ** Has anybody seen the "Table field content change" as an Active Link
>>>  > Execution Option in Dev Studio?  We have an editable check box in a
>>> table
>>> > field where I want to update the source data record as soon as the
>>> check box
>>> > is checked/unchecked.  This sounds like it is exactly what I need but I
>>> > don't see it as an option in Dev Studio.
>>> >
>>> > I have tried setting both the table field and the column as the
>>> "Field:".
>>> > Used both ARS 7.5 p1 and p5 with DS 7.5 p5 and 7.6.03.  I even tried
>>> the
>>> > Admin tool for kicks.
>>> >
>>> > 7.5 Workflow Objects Guide, Pg 28
>>> > Executes when the contents of a table are refreshed in any of the
>>> following
>>> > ways:
>>> > - Loading the field. In the web client, this occurs when the form
>>> data
>>> > is refreshed at predefined intervals
>>> > - Refreshing the table, for example, when the user selects Refresh
>>> or
>>> > Refresh All from the pop-up menu
>>> > - Choosing to view the next or previous chunk, for example, when
>>> the
>>> > user selects Next chunk or Previous chunk from the pop-up menu
>>> > - Clearing the table, for example, when the user selects Clear
>>> Table
>>> > from t

Please Delete the [ No Subject ] Email from this Account Today

[Phil Murnane]

All:

Please pardon the spam email from this account today.  The account has been 
secured again.

Looks like my password got hacked, sigh.  Perils of keeping the same email 
address for 10+ years, I suppose.

Sorry,
--Phil




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"