Re: 30+ million rows in the CMDB

2012-12-27 Thread Mike Worts
Hi Doug,

Thanks very much for your response. You have answered my question. We only use 
ITSM out-of-the-box so I will assume that all ITSM and Atrium workflow has been 
built to use indexes and therefore there is a low risk that we will see any 
inefficient queries.

We will also be looking at moving our CMDB services onto a separate server and 
then we re-balance our server groups as you have suggested.

Regards,

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: 21 December 2012 18:18
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: 30+ million rows in the CMDB

**
Mike,

To answer your questions:


1.   Yes

2.   No significant additional performance impact vs. 1 million

3.   Yes

I hope this is clear and I am sure that there are no further questions on this 
topic..


OK, maybe some additional comments would be useful?

I am going to start with the third question - Is anyone already doing this?

We have at least 10 customers with CMDBs IN PRODUCTION that are at 30M or more 
records.  We in
fact have several customers at the 70 and 80M range currently and two who 
expect to be in the 150 to 220M
range within a year to 18 months.

They are managing their configurations, they load updates, they normalize, they 
reconcile, they have their
incident/change/other processes tied to the CMDB.  This is being used as the 
enterprise CMDB and as the
master control point of configuration.

So, yes, we have customers (and more than one) doing things to larger than the 
scale you are talking about.


Now, back to question 1 - Is it practical?

Yes, it is practical.  If you have that many things in your environment and you 
are tracking the configuration
of your environment, then that is what you need.  It is practical to have many 
items in the store.

Databases are designed to handle multi-millions of records quite well.  In 
fact, 30 million records in a table is
not really a big issue for an enterprise database.  There are many tables in 
large scale enterprises of this size
or larger in many different applications - think credit card transactions or 
bank records or sales or inventory
records for large organizations.


On to the topic of performance impacts.

Of course, if you have 30 million records in a table and you do a query that is 
inefficient and triggers a table
scan, it will be slow.  However, if you have 1 million records (or 500,000 
records) in a table and you do a query
that is inefficient and triggers a table scan, it will be slow.  Sure, the 1 
million record query may be slow and
take say 1 minute and the 30 million record query would be slow and take 15 
minutes.  But, really, if it takes
a minute it is over reasonable wait time already.

The key to any large data store is to NEVER EVER EVER query such that a table 
scan is triggered (unless you
really mean it and understand what you are doing).  The key is good indexing.

The way that the CMDB is accessed always uses indexes. The only time there is 
the risk of a non-indexed
query is when some API program is going direct or when you go to the CMDB query 
screen directly and just
search for a CI or relationship and specify bad queries.

So, sure, you need to control the access to direct querying and you need to pay 
attention to that, but the
normal use of the CMDB is just fine and does not cause an overall impact to 
ITSM or the CMDB or to the
AR System environment.

Now, with this scale of data, there are various configuration choices you may 
want to make because this
volume means lots of data loaders and lots of reconciliation and lots of 
overall CMDB processing.  So, you
may want a dedicated server in the server group (not behind load balancer and 
all CMDB loaders go to that
server and reconciliation runs on that server and so on)  This isolates the 
load and prep work.  Then, all
servers can query (using indexed queries) the data.  This is a common 
configuration choice in environments
with large CMDBs.  Easy to configure, fully supported with standard 
functionality of the system.


Hopefully, this gives a bit of insight into your questions and helps you with 
your implementation.

Doug Mueller
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mike Worts
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 4:43 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: 30+ million rows in the CMDB

**

Hi all,

Let's say that we have a requirement to load 30million records into the CMDB 
and there is a good business justification.

1. Technically, do you think this is good practical?
2. How would it impact ITSM or CMDB performance?
3. Is anyone already doing this?

My thought is that since all 30m records would have to go

30+ million rows in the CMDB

2012-12-21 Thread Mike Worts

Hi all,

Let's say that we have a requirement to load 30million records into the CMDB 
and there is a good business justification.

1. Technically, do you think this is good practical?
2. How would it impact ITSM or CMDB performance?
3. Is anyone already doing this?

My thought is that since all 30m records would have to go into BaseElement, 
there must be an impact to overall performance since BaseElement is queried on 
a regular basis. I assume that most queries will be indexed correctly, however, 
my concern is that one or two irregular queries on the form would have a 
serious impact.

Thanks and Merry Christmas.

Mike.

Remedy ITSM 7.6.04
AIX 6.1
Oracle 11g


This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

2012-12-17 Thread Mike Worts
Has anyone used the ITSM 8.0 stack installer for the following configuration:

Windows 2008 64it Standard,
Oracle 11g 64-Bit Standard

I am struggling to complete the install. The ar.cfg and armonitor.cfg all seem 
to point to an unknown server vw-snj-rem-qa11. The installer does not seem to 
accept the server name and database which I entered during the installation.

Mike.


This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

2012-12-17 Thread Mike Worts
My installation seems to complete successfully, besides getting some minor 
duplicate index errors, but the installer didn't update any of the 'cfg' 
configuration files. The ar.cfg also had an Oracle-Two-Task entry to some 
default remote database. I tried quite a few times. I have plenty of resource, 
and followed the instructions (I had to increase my redo log size).

Remedy fails to start, even if I change my computer name to match the ar.cfg 
entry. Midtier installed ok.

No luck.


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Hennigan, Sandra
Sent: 17 December 2012 12:56
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

**
I tried  failed and finally used the separate installers.

The stack installer failed to concatenate the server name  drive space. 
Example: \\servernameD:\BMCSoftwarefile:///\\servernameD:\BMCSoftware should 
have been \\servername\D:\BMCSoftwarefile:///\\servername\D:\BMCSoftware - 
the slash between servername and drive letter was missing. The error returned 
was Access denied.

Thank you,

Sandra Hennigan
Remedy Developer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mike Worts
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:52 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

**
Has anyone used the ITSM 8.0 stack installer for the following configuration:

Windows 2008 64it Standard,
Oracle 11g 64-Bit Standard

I am struggling to complete the install. The ar.cfg and armonitor.cfg all seem 
to point to an unknown server vw-snj-rem-qa11. The installer does not seem to 
accept the server name and database which I entered during the installation.

Mike.


This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.

If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.

Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments. We 
cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses. We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.

Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

2012-12-17 Thread Mike Worts
Yep, both Remedy and Portmapper services exist.

I had to change the computer name and change OracleTwo-Task to Oracle-SID in 
the ar.cfg before I tried to start Remedy. I even had to change the java path 
in the armonitor.cfg was also wrong. The arerror.log is huge on startup. I 
think it racked up about 25Mb during the start. The installation has obviously 
failed somewhere, but the actual installation log file did not really suggest 
there were any major errors.

Mike.


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Hullule, Kiran
Sent: 17 December 2012 13:18
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

**
Do you see remedy AR service registered in services console along with 
Portmapper? Also what error do you see in arerror.log at the time of ARS 
startup?

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mike Worts
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:43 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

**
My installation seems to complete successfully, besides getting some minor 
duplicate index errors, but the installer didn't update any of the 'cfg' 
configuration files. The ar.cfg also had an Oracle-Two-Task entry to some 
default remote database. I tried quite a few times. I have plenty of resource, 
and followed the instructions (I had to increase my redo log size).

Remedy fails to start, even if I change my computer name to match the ar.cfg 
entry. Midtier installed ok.

No luck.


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Hennigan, Sandra
Sent: 17 December 2012 12:56
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer
**
I tried  failed and finally used the separate installers.

The stack installer failed to concatenate the server name  drive space. 
Example: \\servernameD:\BMCSoftwarefile:///\\servernameD:\BMCSoftware should 
have been \\servername\D:\BMCSoftwarefile:///\\servername\D:\BMCSoftware - 
the slash between servername and drive letter was missing. The error returned 
was Access denied.

Thank you,

Sandra Hennigan
Remedy Developer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mike Worts
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:52 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: v8.0 Preconfigured Stack Installer

**
Has anyone used the ITSM 8.0 stack installer for the following configuration:

Windows 2008 64it Standard,
Oracle 11g 64-Bit Standard

I am struggling to complete the install. The ar.cfg and armonitor.cfg all seem 
to point to an unknown server vw-snj-rem-qa11. The installer does not seem to 
accept the server name and database which I entered during the installation.

Mike.


This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.

If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.

Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments. We 
cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses. We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.

Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.

If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.

Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments. We 
cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses. We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.

Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire

When will the full v8 courses be available?

2012-12-05 Thread Mike Worts
Greetings all,

Does anyone know when the full set of v8 (AR/ITSM/Atrium/SRM etc) course will 
be available?

Thanks,

Mike.

ITSM 7.6.04
AR 7.6.04
AIX 6.1
Oracle 11g


This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: License Catalog

2012-11-19 Thread Mike Worts
Hi Heba,

ADDM is not part of your CMDB license. You will have to buy this separately.

We purchase Analytics about 2 years ago and it was part of Dashboards.

BMC Atrium Dashboards and Analytics - Floating User Add-On License

BMC Atrium Dashboards and Analytics - User Add-on License


Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Heba Hashem, Vodafone Egypt
Sent: 19 November 2012 07:33
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: License Catalog

**
Dears,

Please I need to know if the Atrium Discovery and Dependency Mapping is a 
part of CMDB License or it has a separate licenses. Also, regarding Analytics 
if it is a part of the dashboard licenses or it has a separate license.



Heba Hashem
SYSTEM ANALYST
Customer Management
Vodafone Egypt Telec. SA
Mobile: +20 (10) 07033053
Email: heba.has...@vodafone.com


[cid:07609@19112012-1E24]http://www.vodafone.com.eg/

vodafone.com.eg http://www.vodafone.com.eg



This message and any files or documents attached are confidential and may also 
be legally privileged, protected from disclosure and/or protected by other 
legal rules. It is intended only for the individual or entity named. If you are 
not the named addressee or you have received this email in error, please inform 
the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy or disclose 
it or its contents or use it for any purpose. Thank you. Please also note that 
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.



*

The content of this document is classified as Vodafone Egypt S.A.E. 
Confidential and Proprietary Information.

The recipient hereby is committed to hold in strict confidence the contents of 
this (e-mail, document, information) and not to disclose to any third party 
without the prior written consent of Vodafone Egypt S.A.E. Recipient will be 
held liable for any unauthorized disclosure.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return 
e-mail and delete the message in its entirety, including any attachments.

http://www.vodafone.com.eghttp://www.vodafone.com.eg/

*

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
inline: image001.gif

Re: Server group alias in notification web URL

2012-06-26 Thread Mike Worts
Michael,

Check out BMC Remedy Action Request System 7.6.04 Configuration Guide, page 
125. I think this is what you are looking for. Add the URL of your AR server 
group (e.g. http://server group name/arsys)

Email Notifications Web Path
Specifies the base URL that appears in email notifications. If this field is 
left blank, the Default Web Path is used. (The Email Notifications Web Path 
field is available because the Default Web Path is specified for other 
applications like Flashboards, and it might be different from the mid tier web 
path for opening requests in a notification.) If your company has multiple 
domains, use a fully qualified path name.

AR System Administration: Server Information form-Advanced tab

Regards,

Mike.




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of ravi rai
Sent: 26 June 2012 00:51
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server group alias in notification web URL

**
Michael,
You can refe white paper on server group for more detail on what LJ is suggeting
Page 12-13

Ravi Rai

 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:06:35 -0600
 From: lj.longwing@mda.mil
 Subject: Re: Server group alias in notification web URL
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

 Michael,
 The server sends the notification out as it 'knows itself'so if it knows 
 itself via name1 instead of the group alias...that is what you will get. You 
 should be able to configure both servers in the group to know themselves as 
 the group name, and use the Server-Connect-Name for the server group node 
 specific stuff (that's how I've set it up in the past)

 Or you could use the email replace filter as previously suggested.

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Nau, Michael
 Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:21 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Server group alias in notification web URL

 **

 Hi List,



 we have two servers running ARS 7.0.01 as a group, and one MidTier server 
 running V7.5.

 On SYS:Notification Messages I have configured Incident Assignment 
 Notifications to include both an artask attachment for fullclient users and a 
 web URL for midtier users.



 The server parameter in the web URK always points to the alias of the first 
 server of the group. Since our midtier only knows the group alias, users who 
 click on the link are getting an error message. How can I tell the servers to 
 use the group alias in the web URL? Here's an example of the web URL the 
 server is sending (I masked the server name):



 https://remedy/servlet/ViewFormServlet?form=NTE%3aNotifierserver=xeid=NTS12961712







 Regards,

 Michael



 _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

2012-03-16 Thread Mike Worts
Hi,

Yep, we have raised this with BMC. I have been hosting a daily call with BMC 
since we went live in October going through our issues and slowly but surely, 
resolving each one through hotfixes or small configuration changes to our 
system. I must say, BMC have been very helpful. I think one one of our 
challenges is that we are one of the very few customers using 7.6.04 on an AIX 
platform and we were also one of the early adopters, so it has been a learning 
curve for both ourselves and BMC.

Our FTS symptoms have been very interesting. We reported last October, that our 
FTS Java process was flat lining at 60% CPU. It was a random occurrence 
happening only twice in a few months, but when it started, it did not stop 
until we killed the process. Most recently, we have been getting the error I 
mentioned below, but again it does not happen frequently. We found KB351120 
recently which you may know about, but I don't believe it is related to our 
issue.

For those who are thinking of moving to 7.6.04 (Re: Which sp of 7.6.4 is most 
stable?), I would agree with others that SP3 is your best bet. We are now in 
production on ITSM 7.6.04 SP1/AR 7.6.04 SP1, but we have to monitor the system 
quite carefully for those small blips!

Mike.

Knowledge Article ID:



KA351120

Version:



2.0

Status:



Published

Published date:



01/09/2012

Updated:



01/09/2012



Problem
ARERR 8753 (error in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS) when searching text on Global 
Search of FORT

LP: BMC Remedy IT Service Management Suite




Issue Summary: ARERR 8753 (error in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS) when searching text 
on Global Search


Solution
There is a defect (SW00400482) in 7.6.04 source code that it caused Java stack 
overflow on processing any words that containing OR or AND. The fix will be 
available in 7.6.04 SP2. Attached is the hotfix for 7.6.04 SP1.




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza
Sent: 15 March 2012 14:04
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**

Mike,

For whatever its worth, there are similar problems with FTS in 7.6.03 too and 
we have a long standing open ticket with BMC Support. I cannot be sure if this 
is the same issue that has propagated forward to 7.6.04, unless we compare our 
issues.. Do you have a ticket open with BMC Support related to this?

Joe


From: Mike Wortsmailto:mike.wo...@arqiva.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 7:31 AM
Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**
Same for us on 7.6.04 SP1.

Check your fts log files. You may find the same error as us:

2012-03-14 05:20:33,197 DEBUG [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.utils.CatalogReader (?:?) - getMessage(8753,null,Message not in 
catalog; Message number = 8753,en_GB)
2012-03-14 05:20:33,198 DEBUG [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.utils.CatalogReader (?:?) - getMessage(1,8753,null,Message not in 
catalog; Message number = 8753,en_GB)
2012-03-14 05:20:39,747 ERROR [pool-2-thread-4] 
com.bmc.arsys.pluginsvr.plugins.ARFilterAPIPluginRepository (?:?) - 
ARFilterApiCall FAILs in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

2012-03-14 05:20:33,189 ERROR [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.pluginsvr.plugins.ARFilterAPIPluginRepository (?:?) - 
ARFilterApiCall FAILs in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

We have no solution yet.

Mike.

AR 7.6.04 SP1
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1
AIX 6.1



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Nathan Aker
Sent: 15 March 2012 04:49
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**
Anyone else experiencing major issues with the FTS plugin in 7.6.04?   We have 
been battling continual issues with the FTS plugin in all 3 of our environments 
since upgrading to 7.6.04. The errors are typically some derivative of error 
in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS with different iterations of additional log 
information to accompany it.   Our FTS results sporadically either display no 
matches, or the user gets an error when searching.

ARS 7.6.04 SP2
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1

Nathan Aker
ITSM Solution Architect

McAfee, Inc.
5000 Headquarters Drive
Plano, TX 75024

Web:www.mcafee.comhttp://internal.nai.com/division/marketing/BrandMarketing/templates/www.mcafee.com

[cid:854423012@16032012-0D8A]

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.

If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email 

Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

2012-03-16 Thread Mike Worts
Good question. There is history behind it which I won't go into :) (but it 
includes the words IBM and outsourcing)

We have been running v6.3 on AIX very successfully for many years. We have 
found it to be a robust, reliable and stable platform. It is obviously not 
everyone's first choice, however, I can vouch for it and have had positive 
experiences using it over many years. I think we are starting to see a few 
issues with IBM Java, which probably accounts for quite a few of our rendering 
issues.

Besides that, I like it !!


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Sundberg
Sent: 16 March 2012 13:52
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**

Just wondering

Why on AIX?

Are the benefits that great?



-John



On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Mike Worts 
mike.wo...@arqiva.commailto:mike.wo...@arqiva.com wrote:
**
Hi,

Yep, we have raised this with BMC. I have been hosting a daily call with BMC 
since we went live in October going through our issues and slowly but surely, 
resolving each one through hotfixes or small configuration changes to our 
system. I must say, BMC have been very helpful. I think one one of our 
challenges is that we are one of the very few customers using 7.6.04 on an AIX 
platform and we were also one of the early adopters, so it has been a learning 
curve for both ourselves and BMC.

Our FTS symptoms have been very interesting. We reported last October, that our 
FTS Java process was flat lining at 60% CPU. It was a random occurrence 
happening only twice in a few months, but when it started, it did not stop 
until we killed the process. Most recently, we have been getting the error I 
mentioned below, but again it does not happen frequently. We found KB351120 
recently which you may know about, but I don't believe it is related to our 
issue.

For those who are thinking of moving to 7.6.04 (Re: Which sp of 7.6.4 is most 
stable?), I would agree with others that SP3 is your best bet. We are now in 
production on ITSM 7.6.04 SP1/AR 7.6.04 SP1, but we have to monitor the system 
quite carefully for those small blips!

Mike.

Knowledge Article ID:



KA351120

Version:



2.0

Status:



Published

Published date:



01/09/2012

Updated:



01/09/2012



Problem
ARERR 8753 (error in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS) when searching text on Global 
Search of FORT

LP: BMC Remedy IT Service Management Suite




Issue Summary: ARERR 8753 (error in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS) when searching text 
on Global Search


Solution
There is a defect (SW00400482) in 7.6.04 source code that it caused Java stack 
overflow on processing any words that containing OR or AND. The fix will be 
available in 7.6.04 SP2. Attached is the hotfix for 7.6.04 SP1.




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe 
Martin D'Souza
Sent: 15 March 2012 14:04
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**

Mike,

For whatever its worth, there are similar problems with FTS in 7.6.03 too and 
we have a long standing open ticket with BMC Support. I cannot be sure if this 
is the same issue that has propagated forward to 7.6.04, unless we compare our 
issues.. Do you have a ticket open with BMC Support related to this?

Joe


From: Mike Wortsmailto:mike.wo...@arqiva.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 7:31 AM
Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**
Same for us on 7.6.04 SP1.

Check your fts log files. You may find the same error as us:

2012-03-14 05:20:33,197 DEBUG [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.utils.CatalogReader (?:?) - getMessage(8753,null,Message not in 
catalog; Message number = 8753,en_GB)
2012-03-14 05:20:33,198 DEBUG [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.utils.CatalogReader (?:?) - getMessage(1,8753,null,Message not in 
catalog; Message number = 8753,en_GB)
2012-03-14 05:20:39,747 ERROR [pool-2-thread-4] 
com.bmc.arsys.pluginsvr.plugins.ARFilterAPIPluginRepository (?:?) - 
ARFilterApiCall FAILs in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

2012-03-14 05:20:33,189 ERROR [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.pluginsvr.plugins.ARFilterAPIPluginRepository (?:?) - 
ARFilterApiCall FAILs in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

We have no solution yet.

Mike.

AR 7.6.04 SP1
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1
AIX 6.1



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Nathan 
Aker
Sent: 15 March 2012 04:49
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**
Anyone else experiencing major issues with the FTS plugin in 7.6.04?   We have 
been battling continual issues with the FTS plugin in all 3 of our environments 
since

Re: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

2012-03-15 Thread Mike Worts
Same for us on 7.6.04 SP1.

Check your fts log files. You may find the same error as us:

2012-03-14 05:20:33,197 DEBUG [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.utils.CatalogReader (?:?) - getMessage(8753,null,Message not in 
catalog; Message number = 8753,en_GB)
2012-03-14 05:20:33,198 DEBUG [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.utils.CatalogReader (?:?) - getMessage(1,8753,null,Message not in 
catalog; Message number = 8753,en_GB)
2012-03-14 05:20:39,747 ERROR [pool-2-thread-4] 
com.bmc.arsys.pluginsvr.plugins.ARFilterAPIPluginRepository (?:?) - 
ARFilterApiCall FAILs in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

2012-03-14 05:20:33,189 ERROR [pool-2-thread-5] 
com.bmc.arsys.pluginsvr.plugins.ARFilterAPIPluginRepository (?:?) - 
ARFilterApiCall FAILs in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError

We have no solution yet.

Mike.

AR 7.6.04 SP1
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1
AIX 6.1



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Nathan Aker
Sent: 15 March 2012 04:49
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: FTS Plugin issues in 7.6.04

**
Anyone else experiencing major issues with the FTS plugin in 7.6.04?   We have 
been battling continual issues with the FTS plugin in all 3 of our environments 
since upgrading to 7.6.04. The errors are typically some derivative of error 
in plugin: ARSYS.ARF.FTS with different iterations of additional log 
information to accompany it.   Our FTS results sporadically either display no 
matches, or the user gets an error when searching.

ARS 7.6.04 SP2
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1

Nathan Aker
ITSM Solution Architect

McAfee, Inc.
5000 Headquarters Drive
Plano, TX 75024

Web:www.mcafee.comhttp://internal.nai.com/division/marketing/BrandMarketing/templates/www.mcafee.com

[cid:620103011@15032012-0CCE]

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
inline: image001.jpg

Signal 11 error

2012-03-07 Thread Mike Worts

Hi all,

We just had this error message on our AR Server and I have a few question about 
it if anyone can help please.

1. Is this a memory error that has caused arserverd to crash as I cannot find 
any core dumps?
2. Is Signal 11 an application generated error, on an AIX error?
3. What is the relevance of the Form:TMS:Task value
4. We had API/FILTER/SQL logging on at the time, what should I be looking for 
to point me to the cause?

Wed Mar  7 13:09:18 2012: AR System server terminated when a signal/exception 
was received by the server (ARNOTE  20)
   Signal: 11
   Thread Id: 8759
   Version: 7.6.04 SP1 201104191058 Apr 27 2011 20:10:00
   ServerName:
   Database: SQL -- Oracle
   Hardware: 00F6282E4C00
   OS: AIX 6.1
   RPC Id: 460531
   RPC Call: 73 (GLEWF)
   RPC Queue: 390635
   Client: User dan.henry from Mid-tier (protocol 18) at IP address 
10.161.64.162
   Form: TMS:Task
   Logging On: Alert API Escalation Filter SQL User FTIndexer Thread ServerGroup
Stacks:
Stacks:
I have discussed this with BMC and one possible cause is our Filter-Max-Stack 
is set to '1'. They have asked us to reduce it to '25'. does anyone know if 
it will have an adverse effect on ITSM (I assume 25 is the recommended 
settings).

AIX 6.1
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1
AR 7.6.04 SP1
Oracle 11g

Thanks,

Mike Worts.

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: Signal 11 error

2012-03-07 Thread Mike Worts
They are recommending a Filter-Max-Stack of 25 since our Filter Levels are not 
exceeding 14 (based on output of workflow log files), so, I am not sure if this 
will resolve the Signal 11 problem.

Our ulimit settings are as follows:

time(seconds)unlimited
file(blocks) unlimited
data(kbytes) unlimited
stack(kbytes)4194304
memory(kbytes)   32768
coredump(blocks) 2097151
nofiles(descriptors) 2000
threads(per process) unlimited
processes(per user)  unlimited

Mike.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: 07 March 2012 15:25
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Signal 11 error

Is it the Maximum Filters for an Operation that is at 1 or Max Stack of 
Filters they want changed? Both are at the top of the Advanced tab in the 
Server Information of the AR System Administration Console.

The ar.conf entries are (From the 7.6.04 doc)

Filter-Max-Stack   
Maximum number of recursion levels allowed for an operation. The data 
modification performed by an AR_FILTER_ACTION_FIELDP filter action might 
trigger a second set, or level, of filters, one of which might trigger a third 
level of filters and so on. This option limits the number of times such 
recursion can happen, preventing the server crash that would occur if the 
recursion continued indefinitely. The default value is 25.

Filter-Max-Total   
Maximum number of filters that the server executes for a given operation. The 
default value is 1.

Fred

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 8:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Signal 11 error

** 
 
Mike,
 
They are probably on the wrong track. 25 used to be the recommended max a few 
versions ago. 1 on the current version and recommended configurations, is 
not a very high number.
 
Is there anything written to the System or Application Event log at the time of 
that error?
 
Joe
 
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mike Worts
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 8:29 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Signal 11 error
 
** 
 
Hi all,
 
We just had this error message on our AR Server and I have a few question about 
it if anyone can help please.
 
1. Is this a memory error that has caused arserverd to crash as I cannot find 
any core dumps?
2. Is Signal 11 an application generated error, on an AIX error?
3. What is the relevance of the Form:TMS:Task value
4. We had API/FILTER/SQL logging on at the time, what should I be looking for 
to point me to the cause?
 
Wed Mar  7 13:09:18 2012: AR System server terminated when a signal/exception 
was received by the server (ARNOTE  20)
   Signal: 11
   Thread Id: 8759
   Version: 7.6.04 SP1 201104191058 Apr 27 2011 20:10:00
   ServerName: 
   Database: SQL -- Oracle
   Hardware: 00F6282E4C00
   OS: AIX 6.1
   RPC Id: 460531
   RPC Call: 73 (GLEWF)
   RPC Queue: 390635
   Client: User dan.henry from Mid-tier (protocol 18) at IP address 
10.161.64.162
   Form: TMS:Task
   Logging On: Alert API Escalation Filter SQL User FTIndexer Thread ServerGroup
Stacks:
Stacks:
I have discussed this with BMC and one possible cause is our Filter-Max-Stack 
is set to '1'. They have asked us to reduce it to '25'. does anyone know if 
it will have an adverse effect on ITSM (I assume 25 is the recommended 
settings).
 
AIX 6.1
ITSM 7.6.04 SP1
AR 7.6.04 SP1
Oracle 11g
 
Thanks,
 
Mike Worts.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access

Re: overview console random authentication errors

2012-01-17 Thread Mike Worts
We are getting exactly the same problem on our 7.6.4 environment. I am working 
with BMC on a resolution for quite some time now, but so far, no luck We have 
multiple OU entries in our AREA LDAP configuration form and for some reason it 
seems to skip some before giving us a FAIL.

Our users have already logged into the system, so it is not failing on their 
login or password.

AIX 6.1/ORacle 11g
AR 7.6.4 SP1 (Load Balanced)
Midtier 7.6.4 (unpatched)
ITSM 7.6.4

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patchsk
Sent: 16 January 2012 16:54
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: overview console random authentication errors

**
We are on ITSM 7.6.03 patch001, ARS 7.6.03p002, Windows 2008, Oracle 11g.

We are seeing at random when users click refresh on the overview console or 
sometimes immediately after they login and when the overview console is 
rendering,   users are getting

ERROR (623): Authentication failed error message.

If they wait for some time and try again they could see the tickets in their 
overview console without any issue.

I am suspecting may be the plugin crashed or timed out and threw the misleading 
authentication error message.

Does any one have experienced this issue?

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: overview console random authentication errors

2012-01-17 Thread Mike Worts
Hi there,

Yep - We have a server group configuration. The error only seems to occur when 
users are directed to our PRD02 server, however, it is not happen consistently. 
What would I need to add to the ar.cfg file?

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tauf Chowdhury
Sent: 17 January 2012 13:53
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: overview console random authentication errors

**
Mike,
Like Danny said, it may not be an authentication issue. Are you in a server 
group/ load balanced environment? You may need to update the ar cfg file if 
this is the case.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Mike Worts 
mike.wo...@arqiva.commailto:mike.wo...@arqiva.com wrote:

**
We are getting exactly the same problem on our 7.6.4 environment. I am working 
with BMC on a resolution for quite some time now, but so far, no luck We have 
multiple OU entries in our AREA LDAP configuration form and for some reason it 
seems to skip some before giving us a FAIL.

Our users have already logged into the system, so it is not failing on their 
login or password.

AIX 6.1/ORacle 11g
AR 7.6.4 SP1 (Load Balanced)
Midtier 7.6.4 (unpatched)
ITSM 7.6.4

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patchsk
Sent: 16 January 2012 16:54
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: overview console random authentication errors

**
We are on ITSM 7.6.03 patch001, ARS 7.6.03p002, Windows 2008, Oracle 11g.

We are seeing at random when users click refresh on the overview console or 
sometimes immediately after they login and when the overview console is 
rendering,   users are getting

ERROR (623): Authentication failed error message.

If they wait for some time and try again they could see the tickets in their 
overview console without any issue.

I am suspecting may be the plugin crashed or timed out and threw the misleading 
authentication error message.

Does any one have experienced this issue?

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.comhttp://www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers 
Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.

If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.

Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments. We 
cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses. We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.

Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.comhttp://www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers 
Are_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList

Re: overview console random authentication errors

2012-01-17 Thread Mike Worts
Hi Doug,

Thanks for the help.

We are only load balanced at the AR level, so we have one midtier server 
pointing to 2 AR servers which are load balanced.

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Doug Blair
Sent: 17 January 2012 15:12
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: overview console random authentication errors

** Patchsk, Mike et al...

For debugging purposes, you can set a configuration line in midtier install 
dir\WEB-INF\classes\config.properties that will include the IP-address of 
which midtier is responding in the headers. That's designed for debugging 
issues just like this.  You can then use fiddler2 to capture the headers of 
each exchange with the mid tiers and make sure you're always connecting to the 
same one.  If you're not, you'll need to adjust the load balancer so that your 
client session stays attached to the same midtier for a longer time.

Save a copy of the config.properties file, set arsystem.response.hostip=true 
(the default is false), save the config file and restart the mid tiers.

Hope this helps...

Doug




On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Tauf Chowdhury wrote:

**
I would start by checking the server name and ip name entries as specified in 
the config doc. It doesn't hurt to compare the config file for the working 
server versus the broken one.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Mike Worts 
mike.wo...@arqiva.commailto:mike.wo...@arqiva.com wrote:

**
Hi there,

Yep - We have a server group configuration. The error only seems to occur when 
users are directed to our PRD02 server, however, it is not happen consistently. 
What would I need to add to the ar.cfg file?

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tauf 
Chowdhury
Sent: 17 January 2012 13:53
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: overview console random authentication errors

**
Mike,
Like Danny said, it may not be an authentication issue. Are you in a server 
group/ load balanced environment? You may need to update the ar cfg file if 
this is the case.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Mike Worts 
mike.wo...@arqiva.commailto:mike.wo...@arqiva.com wrote:

**
We are getting exactly the same problem on our 7.6.4 environment. I am working 
with BMC on a resolution for quite some time now, but so far, no luck We have 
multiple OU entries in our AREA LDAP configuration form and for some reason it 
seems to skip some before giving us a FAIL.

Our users have already logged into the system, so it is not failing on their 
login or password.

AIX 6.1/ORacle 11g
AR 7.6.4 SP1 (Load Balanced)
Midtier 7.6.4 (unpatched)
ITSM 7.6.4

Mike.

Michael Worts
Service Management Programme Systems Lead
Arqiva

Direct 01962 822705 Mobile 07801 755346
Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2QA
www.arqiva.comhttp://www.arqiva.com/



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patchsk
Sent: 16 January 2012 16:54
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: overview console random authentication errors

**
We are on ITSM 7.6.03 patch001, ARS 7.6.03p002, Windows 2008, Oracle 11g.

We are seeing at random when users click refresh on the overview console or 
sometimes immediately after they login and when the overview console is 
rendering,   users are getting

ERROR (623): Authentication failed error message.

If they wait for some time and try again they could see the tickets in their 
overview console without any issue.

I am suspecting may be the plugin crashed or timed out and threw the misleading 
authentication error message.

Does any one have experienced this issue?

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.comhttp://www.wwrug.com/ ARSlist: Where the 
Answers Are_

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.

If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.

Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure

Re: Masking the email address sent from Remedy

2009-02-20 Thread Mike Worts
Hi Frex,
 
You can always change the 'Display Name' and 'Reply To Address' which
will mask the email address that Remedy has sent from. This can be
changed in the 'Email Mailbox Configuration' form or from a Notify
Filter via workflow.
 
Hope this helps,
 
Regards,
 
Mike.



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Frex Popo
Sent: 20 February 2009 10:07
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Masking the email address sent from Remedy


** 
Dear all,
 
I have been asked, if posible, to mask the email address sent in the
remedy notifications.
 
If you have say myarl...@remedy.world sent in your notifications, to
change to something else when it reaches the users inbox. I know this
does not make sense, since the exhange server needs to know the real
address to be able to deliver the notification. However is there anyway
you could do something similar on the echange server side?
 
The other solution is to create a new email account in remedy but I am
trying to avoid this since it will involved changes to the workflow
etc...
 
Sorry if this is not a remedy question .-)
 
Regards
frex

__Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are
html___

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are for the personal 
attention of the addressee only, any other usage or access is unauthorised. It 
may contain information which could be confidential or privileged. If you are 
not the intended addressee you may not copy, disclose, circulate or use it.
If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the 
sender by email. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are 
subject to contract.  
Although we use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all sent emails, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and we 
advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachments.  
We cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software 
viruses.  We reserve the right to monitor email communications through our 
networks.
Arqiva Limited. Registered office: Crawley Court, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 
2QA United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales number 2487597


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: Where the Answers Are