Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

2012-01-05 Thread Mori, Toshiyasu
Logan,


1.   SAM console Certificate and related CIs (or Unrelated CIs there are 
three tables in the Console) is only supporting RLE engine running results not 
manually adding Software Asset CIs (no matter what relationship type, Attached 
To, or other relationship type), that is as design. You should use license 
engine to confirm the connections (relationships).

2.   Please choose license Job type to ALL instead of COMPLIANCE if haven't 
gotten any CI connection before.

3.   Asset Management document have listed trouble shooting about not found 
CI connection or compliance status (deploy number) results are not expected.

Please double check these

(1)Make sure Software Asset CI records (Product) has the same Company as 
License Certificate and License Job

(2)Make sure that license type using in License Certificate is the same as 
License Job (e.g. Per copy)

(3)Make sure the License Certificate status is Active and Connect to Engine 
flag changes to Yes in Certificate form, and save the changes.

(4)Make sure that License Job qualification covers what you want (you can 
leave product name, market version, tier 1, 2, 3 fields empty so RLE engine 
will check, make connection and calculate deploy number in a large scope of CI 
may take a little longer).

4.   You can verify log to check connection but the log is more use for 
trouble shooting (error identification).

Charles

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Logan, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:37 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

**
Still not getting a license connect.  Here's what I tried:

Redefined Quickbooks software as a Product CI type.
Updated the categorization in the license certificates.
Created five software instances (Product CI), QuickBooks-1 to 05.
Created five laptops (Computer System CI), related them to people (Dependency - 
Used By), added software, one to each, using Component (Child) relationship.  
Each laptop now shows two child relationships, dependency to a person and 
component to a product (QuickBooks).
Back to SAM console, opened license certificates, created 'Attached To' 
relationships between license certificates and products (software) - all five 
product CIs are listed as Related CIs on the console, but the deployed numbers 
are still 0.
Ran compliance only job - Found nothing at all - No CIs with certs, no CIs 
without certs, all four lines are 0s.
Set job to do review and connect again - Found 5 CIs with no certs.  Back to 
SAM console, the job disconnected all five product CIs again from the license 
certifications.

Something is still throwing off the license engine.  Again, is there anywhere 
in the documentation that explains what the License Engine uses to connect so I 
can check these details myself?  The Product CIs and license certificates have 
the exact same categorization.  Why isn't it accepting the 'Attached To' 
relationship I create manually?

Do I have to use the license engine in order to confirm these connections (set 
the deployed values)?  In this example, three specific items of software are 
supposed to be attached to one license cert, and two to another - if the 
license engine just maps whatever matches, how will I make sure it doesn't 
choose the wrong ones?


Kelly Logan, Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy), GMS
ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 
USA | 734.997.4777
kelly.lo...@proquest.commailto:kelly.lo...@proquest.com
www.proquest.com

ProQuest...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and delete the 
message from your computer.




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mori, Toshiyasu
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

**
Logan,


1.   Please relate People to parent CI (Computer System) not Software Asset 
CI with Used by role (then you should see Person is associated to the Computer 
System Relationships table, RLE rule checks Person relationship when work with 
Per copy license type).

2.   CI Type BMC_Application is not Software Asset CI Type it doesn't 
support RLE engine rule, you should choose either of CI Types from System 
Component - Product, Package, Operating System, Patch, System Software, System 
- Software Server as Software CI.

3.   if you use Purchase Line item UI to create line item, it will give you 
message to select Contract and/or license certificate when CI Type was chosen 
Software Asset CI.

Toshiyasu
Asset

Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

2012-01-05 Thread Mori, Toshiyasu
Logan,
A small correction, in (3) change status of License Certificate to Executed 
(not Active as it doesn't provide such status value, sorry) and make sure 
Engine connection is Yes and save the update.

Toshiyasu

From: Mori, Toshiyasu
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 10:07 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: RE: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

Logan,


1.   SAM console Certificate and related CIs (or Unrelated CIs there are 
three tables in the Console) is only supporting RLE engine running results not 
manually adding Software Asset CIs (no matter what relationship type, Attached 
To, or other relationship type), that is as design. You should use license 
engine to confirm the connections (relationships).

2.   Please choose license Job type to ALL instead of COMPLIANCE if haven't 
gotten any CI connection before.

3.   Asset Management document have listed trouble shooting about not found 
CI connection or compliance status (deploy number) results are not expected.

Please double check these

(1)Make sure Software Asset CI records (Product) has the same Company as 
License Certificate and License Job

(2)Make sure that license type using in License Certificate is the same as 
License Job (e.g. Per copy)

(3)Make sure the License Certificate status is Active and Connect to Engine 
flag changes to Yes in Certificate form, and save the changes.

(4)Make sure that License Job qualification covers what you want (you can 
leave product name, market version, tier 1, 2, 3 fields empty so RLE engine 
will check, make connection and calculate deploy number in a large scope of CI 
may take a little longer).

4.   You can verify log to check connection but the log is more use for 
trouble shooting (error identification).

Charles

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Logan, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 8:37 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

**
Still not getting a license connect.  Here's what I tried:

Redefined Quickbooks software as a Product CI type.
Updated the categorization in the license certificates.
Created five software instances (Product CI), QuickBooks-1 to 05.
Created five laptops (Computer System CI), related them to people (Dependency - 
Used By), added software, one to each, using Component (Child) relationship.  
Each laptop now shows two child relationships, dependency to a person and 
component to a product (QuickBooks).
Back to SAM console, opened license certificates, created 'Attached To' 
relationships between license certificates and products (software) - all five 
product CIs are listed as Related CIs on the console, but the deployed numbers 
are still 0.
Ran compliance only job - Found nothing at all - No CIs with certs, no CIs 
without certs, all four lines are 0s.
Set job to do review and connect again - Found 5 CIs with no certs.  Back to 
SAM console, the job disconnected all five product CIs again from the license 
certifications.

Something is still throwing off the license engine.  Again, is there anywhere 
in the documentation that explains what the License Engine uses to connect so I 
can check these details myself?  The Product CIs and license certificates have 
the exact same categorization.  Why isn't it accepting the 'Attached To' 
relationship I create manually?

Do I have to use the license engine in order to confirm these connections (set 
the deployed values)?  In this example, three specific items of software are 
supposed to be attached to one license cert, and two to another - if the 
license engine just maps whatever matches, how will I make sure it doesn't 
choose the wrong ones?


Kelly Logan, Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy), GMS
ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 
USA | 734.997.4777
kelly.lo...@proquest.commailto:kelly.lo...@proquest.com
www.proquest.com

ProQuest...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and delete the 
message from your computer.




From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mori, Toshiyasu
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

**
Logan,


1.   Please relate People to parent CI (Computer System) not Software Asset 
CI with Used by role (then you should see Person is associated to the Computer 
System Relationships table, RLE rule checks Person relationship when work with 
Per copy license type).

2.   CI Type BMC_Application is not Software Asset CI Type it doesn't 
support RLE engine

Re: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

2012-01-04 Thread Mori, Toshiyasu
Logan,


1.   Please relate People to parent CI (Computer System) not Software Asset 
CI with Used by role (then you should see Person is associated to the Computer 
System Relationships table, RLE rule checks Person relationship when work with 
Per copy license type).

2.   CI Type BMC_Application is not Software Asset CI Type it doesn't 
support RLE engine rule, you should choose either of CI Types from System 
Component - Product, Package, Operating System, Patch, System Software, System 
- Software Server as Software CI.

3.   if you use Purchase Line item UI to create line item, it will give you 
message to select Contract and/or license certificate when CI Type was chosen 
Software Asset CI.

Toshiyasu
Asset management QA lead, BMC Software


---
Toshiyasu Mori (Charles)
ITSM QA Engineer, Service Support Dept
Room 2403, 91 E. Tasman Dr,
San Jose, CA 95134, U.S.A
Tel: 1-408-571-7270  Fax: 1-408-571-7001
BMC Software  www.bmc.comhttp://www.bmc.com/
toshiyasu_m...@bmc.commailto:toshiyasu_m...@bmc.com

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Logan, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:00 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Asset Management - Manual add software, license

**
We will be using an outside product for procurement, so I am testing the 
process of adding software and licenses on ARS/ITSM 7.6.4.

Following the instructions in the Asset Management User guide, I have created 
Application CIs and related them to users, and created a software contract and 
license certificates, and I have used the 'Search for Existing Record to 
Relate' function on the 'Software Assets' tab of the license certificates to 
relate the software CIs (Application CI type).  But this does not change the 
deployment numbers on the certificate.

When I run the license engine job (does a full check on all CIs for this 
company), it removes this relationship and states that the CIs have no 
certificates.

What do I need to match to have the license engine link the Application CIs to 
the certificates?

Certificates
Company:  PQ-GIO
Status: Executed
License Type: Per copy
Related to Product Category:
   Manufacturer:  Intuit, Inc.
   Product Name:  QuickBooks
   Market Version:  12.0
   Cat 1:  Software
   Cat 2:  Application
   Cat 3:  Third Party

Application CIs
Company:  PQ-GIO
Status:  Deployed
Product Categorization -
Tier 1:  Software
Tier 2:  Application
Tier 3:  Third Party
Product Name:  QuickBooks
Model/Version:  Pro / 12.0
Manufacturer:  Intuit, Inc.
Financials - Cost Entries:  License Certificate listed, Association Type 
Secondary, with the correct LC#

Note that when I didn't have the market version set, I couldn't put in the 
related product categorization on the certificate, the most I could get was the 
Manufacturer and the Product Name.  When this was all that was set, the License 
Engine run would say either the CIs had no certificates or that they had 
multiple (some of each), with no rhyme or reason that I could discern for which 
it picked.

Any idea what I am missing here?

Is there anything that documents that basic steps and requirements to manually 
enter a new piece of software and a license for it?

Kelly Logan, Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy), GMS
ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 
USA | 734.997.4777
kelly.lo...@proquest.commailto:kelly.lo...@proquest.com
www.proquest.com

ProQuest...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and delete the 
message from your computer.

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: Asset Management - Software license contracts - Microsoft Master Business Agreement, Data Management, categorization

2011-12-13 Thread Mori, Toshiyasu
Kelly,
Let me try to answer your question #2 and #4

2) about Software contract, Yes, you should use AST:AssetSoftware. 
CTR:GenericContract is using for customized contract type (if you want to add 
your own contract type, for example Rent Contract)

4) about Product Categorization, the data comes from PDL:Product Dictionary.
If you manually created product catalog, make sure you have add model/version 
to Product Catalog, and in Model/Version dialog form (PDL:ProductModelVersion), 
set Market Version and select Contract Required radio button to Yes. Also check 
Company Association if is it not - Global -, that means the product catalog 
restricted to certain company, then the Software Contract and License 
Certificate company should match to.
If the product catalog was discovered from outside, check Atrium Normalization 
to use proper normalize option for the imported dataset during data synchronize 
to Atrium CMDB

PDL:Product Dictionary is a joined form from PDL:ProductModelVersion (joined 
from PCT:Product Catalog and PCT:Product Model/Version)and PCT:Product Company 
Association.

Toshiyasu
Asset Management QA in BMC.



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Logan, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Asset Management - Software license contracts - Microsoft Master 
Business Agreement, Data Management, categorization

**
Hello all,

I have been working with Asset Management 7.6.4 to prepare to enter our current 
contracts.  My goal is to use the Data Management tool 
(Transactional-Contract.xls) to import the bulk of the license data once I have 
figured out the format to use.  I have read through the AM docs (and a fair 
amount of the CMDB ones), but I still have a few questions on what I've found 
so far.


1.) Microsoft Master Business Agreements - We have negotiated a MBA with MS 
under their Enterprise 6 Program, which gives us certain purchasing 
abilities.  We can add or remove software on a year by year basis, and the 
numbers for each are 'trued up' each year as well.  There is an MBA #, an 
Enrollment #, a Software Assurance ID #, and an Agreement/Contract #.  I have 
listed my current strategy below.  Does anyone have any other strategies, 
recommendations for representing these kinds of agreements?

a.   Master Contract for the MBA itself (with the {Enrollment #}-Master as 
the Contract ID, and the MBA # as the Customer ID), then

b.  Master Contracts underneath it for each year ({Enrollment #}-{year} as 
Contract ID), then

c.   Software License Contracts underneath each year master for each type 
of software with a representative ID (Ex: Contract ID MS-EX-001-2011: 
Microsoft MS - Exchange EX - First to use the MS-EX prefix 001 - Year 
2011), and then

d.  License Certificates for each Software License Contract (eventually to 
connect to CIs from discovery tools, with same IDs).

2.)Importing Software License Contracts - The CTR-GenericContract tab 
says not to use it for Software License contracts.  I looked up the mappings in 
the Data Mgmt Admin guide and it looks like I'm supposed to use 
AST-AssetSoftware instead as this goes to CTR:ContractBase and 
AST:AssetSoftware - Is this correct?

3.)What is used in the Contract Identifier field on the Data Mgmt tabs?  Is 
this used to connect contracts and masters?  How do I determine what to put in 
this column?

4.)When creating a license certificate with the dialog that pops up from 
the Contract Add button, I can choose, say, Microsoft as a manufacturer, 
but the categories available don't reflect the product categories I have 
created, just the generics.  Is this pulling from a different area?
Thanks in advance for your help, and any other advice for entering/maintaining 
licenses would be welcome as well!  :^)


Kelly Logan, Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy), GMS
ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 
USA | 734.997.4777
kelly.lo...@proquest.commailto:kelly.lo...@proquest.com
www.proquest.com

ProQuest...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and delete the 
message from your computer.

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are