Re: Write Access Permissions Error Submitting SRM On Behalf Of

2012-08-11 Thread Steve Baumann
To the 'write access error', there does seem to be a bit of conflict or at 
least confusion in the documentation. The statement in your original post, An 
individual with a BMC Remedy AR System Read license can act on-behalf-of 
another individual, group, or company. is a true statement but only if they 
happen to be the first person to do this for the 'other' entity. Subsequest 
read-only licensed individuals who try to perform an on-behalf-of action for 
that entity will get an error. As was stated earlier, the first action creates 
an entry in ENT:Enttitlement Generate QUAL/CACHE form, but the second person 
receives the error when updating this record. This is standard age-old ARS 
licensing behavior.

There is another note on page 19 of the SRM User's Guide that states: Users 
who are allowed to submit requests on behalf of another user must be assigned a 
fixed or floating license so that they can manage the requests after submitting 
them on behalf of the other user. So, in one place we're told only a RO 
license is needed, then in another we're told a Write license is needed (at 
least to 'manage' the requests). Based on the fact that users need to modify a 
record created by a different user, Write license wins.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: SRM Read-Only Questions

2012-03-14 Thread Steve Baumann
Hi, Mo. If they have to acknowledge the information, then it really can't be 
read only, right? You can have a question (your disclaimer) and an answer 
(their acknowledgement) but then not do anything with it. You don't have to map 
it to the back end fullfillment form.

Steve B.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are