Re: Keeping a change request confidential

2013-05-21 Thread Girish Gupta
Let us break this into 2 parts:

1. The request for which approval request is sent can be viewed by the approver 
only if he part of the company to which the request belongs. So if the request 
can be access for Company-1, the approver from Company-2 cannot view the 
request.

Approval Server command provides the paramter -l which can be used to pass 
application request specific tenancy fields to the approval server ( AP:Detail 
form).

Application-Command Approval New-Details -s "$SCHEMA$" -e "$Request ID$" -t 
"$ApprovalProcessName$" -l "$112$;$60900$"

2. Now if approver or an alternate is from company-2 when the request cannot be 
access by the approver/alternate, he can still approve/reject the request. As a 
design practice, we do allow this person to approve if he is the approve, but 
then we do add minimal information that he needs for approving by showing that 
info in the approval central. Mostly this showing of minimal information is 
done by mapping application form fields to fields in AP:Forms ( See under 
AP:Administration).

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"


Re: Keeping a change request confidential

2013-05-16 Thread Hodgdon, Paul
We have done confidential incidents by using multi-tenancy.  I just didn't know 
if having approvals makes that more challenging. In other words do the 
approvers need access to both companies?  If they select an alternate how does 
that alternate see the request if they aren't part of the other company.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:56 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Keeping a change request confidential

**
When I've looked at this in the past, I was going to try to leverage either 
multi-tenancy or create a customization to limit the support groups that could 
access it (I was looking at confidential Incidents.)  Instead, the requester 
opted to track those requests in another system.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Hodgdon, Paul
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Keeping a change request confidential

**
I was wondering if anyone has ever had to keep a change request confidential 
from other support groups. Right now if a change request comes in, other groups 
can see the content, but not edit it.  Is it possible to have a request not 
even be read, or at least the work detail and notes be read by another group?  
I do want approvers to still be able to approve it if it is assigned to them.

[Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CB1CFE.724B27B0]
IT Accounts & ITSM Applications Manager
University of New Hampshire
Client Services
Primary: (603) 862-2377
Alternate: (603) 862-4242
paul.hodg...@unh.edu<mailto:paul.hodg...@unh.edu>
http://accounts.unh.edu<http://accounts.unh.edu/>

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
Private and confidential as detailed 
here<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot access 
hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
<>

Re: Keeping a change request confidential

2013-05-16 Thread Pierson, Shawn
When I've looked at this in the past, I was going to try to leverage either 
multi-tenancy or create a customization to limit the support groups that could 
access it (I was looking at confidential Incidents.)  Instead, the requester 
opted to track those requests in another system.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Hodgdon, Paul
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Keeping a change request confidential

**
I was wondering if anyone has ever had to keep a change request confidential 
from other support groups. Right now if a change request comes in, other groups 
can see the content, but not edit it.  Is it possible to have a request not 
even be read, or at least the work detail and notes be read by another group?  
I do want approvers to still be able to approve it if it is assigned to them.

[Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CB1CFE.724B27B0]
IT Accounts & ITSM Applications Manager
University of New Hampshire
Client Services
Primary: (603) 862-2377
Alternate: (603) 862-4242
paul.hodg...@unh.edu<mailto:paul.hodg...@unh.edu>
http://accounts.unh.edu<http://accounts.unh.edu/>

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx .  If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
<>