Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-27 Thread Lisa Kemes
I usually do this when I'm comparing something in Dev and Prod, but it
might work here as well.  Take the def file of each form and compare just
the field.  Maybe there is something slightly different on the field from
one form to the next?

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Peters, Ron rpet...@columbia.com wrote:

 **

 After some more testing, I can rule out the AL. I simply created a new
 character field on both forms, gave them a default value, gave them
 ‘display’ for their entry modes, and changed their name/display from
 ‘character field’ to ‘test field’. I added them both to their respective
 ‘work detail’ tabs in an open space for visibility.

 ** **

 Flushed cache.

 ** **

 In Chrome/FF, when creating a new record, the field on HPD:Help Desk has
 it’s default value that can be highlighted/copied/pasted etc. The field on
 CHG:Infrastructure Change can do no such thing though it is accessible
 within IE.

 ** **

 I’m still pretty green at this but that just seems stupid. Am I missing a
 setting?

 ** **

 Thoughts?

 ** **

 Thanks.

 ** **

 *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
 *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2013 3:16 PM
 *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 *Subject:* Re: New custom field oddity

 ** **

 ** 

 Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?

 ** **

 *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
 mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Peters,
 Ron
 *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
 *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 *Subject:* New custom field oddity

 ** **

 ** 

 Hi all,

 ** **

 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure
 Change forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display
 fields. Each one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL
 is working fine as the value is correct on both. The issue I’m having is
 browser based. Both fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC
 field works in FF and Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I’m
 unable to interact with it. I can’t select/highlight/copy the field
 contents in those browsers.

 ** **

 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting
 that I’m missing?

 ** **

 Thanks in advance,

 Ron 

 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-27 Thread Peters, Ron
Thanks everyone for all the suggestions. This was a cache issue of some form. 
Today I started by having others test the fields with their versions of FF and 
Chrome. They succeeded which pointed to my system. I then tried again myself 
and found the original field I created last week working. The new test field I 
created yesterday was still not working. I removed both test fields and they're 
working as expected now.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Lisa Kemes
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:03 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

** I usually do this when I'm comparing something in Dev and Prod, but it might 
work here as well.  Take the def file of each form and compare just the field.  
Maybe there is something slightly different on the field from one form to the 
next?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Peters, Ron 
rpet...@columbia.commailto:rpet...@columbia.com wrote:
**
After some more testing, I can rule out the AL. I simply created a new 
character field on both forms, gave them a default value, gave them 'display' 
for their entry modes, and changed their name/display from 'character field' to 
'test field'. I added them both to their respective 'work detail' tabs in an 
open space for visibility.

Flushed cache.

In Chrome/FF, when creating a new record, the field on HPD:Help Desk has it's 
default value that can be highlighted/copied/pasted etc. The field on 
CHG:Infrastructure Change can do no such thing though it is accessible within 
IE.

I'm still pretty green at this but that just seems stupid. Am I missing a 
setting?

Thoughts?

Thanks.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pargeter, 
Christie :CO IS
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

**
Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: New custom field oddity

**
Hi all,

I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure Change 
forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each 
one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working fine 
as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both 
fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and 
Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it. I 
can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting that 
I'm missing?

Thanks in advance,
Ron
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Peters, Ron
For what it's worth, I've flushed both the browser and mid-tier cache multiple 
times without change. With the caches flushed, I'm not sure why these fields 
would perform differently between browsers. Any other ideas?

I've looked at the client logs both in Chrome and IE and they both look the 
same from my untrained eye. The AL that sets the field value is working in the 
same way in both logs.

Thanks again,
Ron

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

Hi,

The Window-Open and Window-Loaded does not happen that much in ITSM76 with the
Inline-Type form display used. The Display should always happen when you
search and display a new ticket though.

The way BMC has build the Inline forms for ITSM76, it pretty much hides/shows
the form you are currently accessing, but keeps the form loaded in a hidden
View Field.

The other thing that might be problematic is the Mid-Tier Cache. I have
sometimes had severe problems getting Inline form caches to be recached. I
suspect that you have something cached for the browser that is not yet
working. Either in the client-browser-cache or on the Mid-Tier server.

The client-side log I was talking about was what you see in Mid-Tier when you
turn on logging for a user. This is done in the User Preference form.

Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

 The AL's are triggered on display, window open, and window loaded. When you
 say client side logging, I hear user tool. Both of these fields work perfectly
 within the user tool if that makes any difference. Which log should be enabled
 for web clients? Is that mid-tier logging?

 Thanks,
 Ron

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:23 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 Hi,

 What exactly triggers the ACTL that fill in the fields?

 What does your client side logging say? Have you compared the two?

 Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

 Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
 * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
 * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
 Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se

 Hi all,

 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure
 Change
 forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each
 one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working
 fine
 as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both
 fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and
 Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it.
 I
 can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting
 that
 I'm missing?

 Thanks in advance,
 Ron

 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
 .

 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Brittain, Mark
Ron,

This is a real shot in the dark but is there any chance that the blank label of 
an adjacent field is laying on top of this field? The only thing I can think of 
is that one browser puts your field in the foreground and the other puts it in 
the background.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

For what it's worth, I've flushed both the browser and mid-tier cache multiple 
times without change. With the caches flushed, I'm not sure why these fields 
would perform differently between browsers. Any other ideas?

I've looked at the client logs both in Chrome and IE and they both look the 
same from my untrained eye. The AL that sets the field value is working in the 
same way in both logs.

Thanks again,
Ron

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

Hi,

The Window-Open and Window-Loaded does not happen that much in ITSM76 with the 
Inline-Type form display used. The Display should always happen when you search 
and display a new ticket though.

The way BMC has build the Inline forms for ITSM76, it pretty much hides/shows 
the form you are currently accessing, but keeps the form loaded in a hidden 
View Field.

The other thing that might be problematic is the Mid-Tier Cache. I have 
sometimes had severe problems getting Inline form caches to be recached. I 
suspect that you have something cached for the browser that is not yet working. 
Either in the client-browser-cache or on the Mid-Tier server.

The client-side log I was talking about was what you see in Mid-Tier when you 
turn on logging for a user. This is done in the User Preference form.

Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

 The AL's are triggered on display, window open, and window loaded.
 When you say client side logging, I hear user tool. Both of these
 fields work perfectly within the user tool if that makes any
 difference. Which log should be enabled for web clients? Is that mid-tier 
 logging?

 Thanks,
 Ron

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:23 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 Hi,

 What exactly triggers the ACTL that fill in the fields?

 What does your client side logging say? Have you compared the two?

 Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP
 2011)

 Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
 * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
 * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
 Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
 http://rrr.se

 Hi all,

 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and
 CHG:Infrastructure Change forms. They are both similar in that they
 are read-only display fields. Each one has an active link that gives
 the field its value. The AL is working fine as the value is correct
 on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both fields work
 correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and Chrome.
 The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it.
 I
 can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some
 setting that I'm missing?

 Thanks in advance,
 Ron

 _
 __ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
 .

 __
 _ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers 
Are, and have been for 20 years


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers 
Are, and have been for 20 years

This e-mail is the property of NaviSite, Inc. It is intended only for the 
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information

Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Peters, Ron
I don't think so. I've moved the field around to various parts of the form with 
no changes. Weird that it works in IE and the user tool but not the other 
browsers.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brittain, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

Ron,

This is a real shot in the dark but is there any chance that the blank label of 
an adjacent field is laying on top of this field? The only thing I can think of 
is that one browser puts your field in the foreground and the other puts it in 
the background.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

For what it's worth, I've flushed both the browser and mid-tier cache multiple 
times without change. With the caches flushed, I'm not sure why these fields 
would perform differently between browsers. Any other ideas?

I've looked at the client logs both in Chrome and IE and they both look the 
same from my untrained eye. The AL that sets the field value is working in the 
same way in both logs.

Thanks again,
Ron

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

Hi,

The Window-Open and Window-Loaded does not happen that much in ITSM76 with the 
Inline-Type form display used. The Display should always happen when you search 
and display a new ticket though.

The way BMC has build the Inline forms for ITSM76, it pretty much hides/shows 
the form you are currently accessing, but keeps the form loaded in a hidden 
View Field.

The other thing that might be problematic is the Mid-Tier Cache. I have 
sometimes had severe problems getting Inline form caches to be recached. I 
suspect that you have something cached for the browser that is not yet working. 
Either in the client-browser-cache or on the Mid-Tier server.

The client-side log I was talking about was what you see in Mid-Tier when you 
turn on logging for a user. This is done in the User Preference form.

Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

 The AL's are triggered on display, window open, and window loaded.
 When you say client side logging, I hear user tool. Both of these
 fields work perfectly within the user tool if that makes any
 difference. Which log should be enabled for web clients? Is that mid-tier 
 logging?

 Thanks,
 Ron

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:23 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 Hi,

 What exactly triggers the ACTL that fill in the fields?

 What does your client side logging say? Have you compared the two?

 Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP
 2011)

 Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
 * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
 * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
 Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
 http://rrr.se

 Hi all,

 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and
 CHG:Infrastructure Change forms. They are both similar in that they
 are read-only display fields. Each one has an active link that gives
 the field its value. The AL is working fine as the value is correct
 on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both fields work
 correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and Chrome.
 The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it.
 I
 can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some
 setting that I'm missing?

 Thanks in advance,
 Ron

 _
 __ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
 .

 __
 _ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives

Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Peters, Ron
After some more testing, I can rule out the AL. I simply created a new 
character field on both forms, gave them a default value, gave them 'display' 
for their entry modes, and changed their name/display from 'character field' to 
'test field'. I added them both to their respective 'work detail' tabs in an 
open space for visibility.

Flushed cache.

In Chrome/FF, when creating a new record, the field on HPD:Help Desk has it's 
default value that can be highlighted/copied/pasted etc. The field on 
CHG:Infrastructure Change can do no such thing though it is accessible within 
IE.

I'm still pretty green at this but that just seems stupid. Am I missing a 
setting?

Thoughts?

Thanks.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

**
Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGmailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: New custom field oddity

**
Hi all,

I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure Change 
forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each 
one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working fine 
as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both 
fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and 
Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it. I 
can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting that 
I'm missing?

Thanks in advance,
Ron
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Ron,
What version of Remedy and what version of Mid-Tier are you running?

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:28 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

** 

After some more testing, I can rule out the AL. I simply created a new 
character field on both forms, gave them a default value, gave them 'display' 
for their entry modes, and changed their name/display from 'character field' to 
'test field'. I added them both to their respective 'work detail' tabs in an 
open space for visibility.

 

Flushed cache.

 

In Chrome/FF, when creating a new record, the field on HPD:Help Desk has it's 
default value that can be highlighted/copied/pasted etc. The field on 
CHG:Infrastructure Change can do no such thing though it is accessible within 
IE.

 

I'm still pretty green at this but that just seems stupid. Am I missing a 
setting?

 

Thoughts?

 

Thanks.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 

** 

Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: New custom field oddity

 

** 

Hi all,

 

I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure Change 
forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each 
one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working fine 
as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both 
fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and 
Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it. I 
can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

 

Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting that 
I'm missing?

 

Thanks in advance,

Ron 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Rick Westbrock
Have you tried accessing the form with multiple user accounts? I have
recently seen that sometimes when making a change to form fields that some
users will see the change and others won't if only a simple MT cache flush
has been done. We now stop Tomcat, delete the cache files and restart Tomcat
to effectively rebuild the cache from scratch instead of just refreshing it.
This seems to have resolved the seemingly arbitrary issues we were seeing
for one subset of users one time, then a different subset of users another
time.

-Rick


___
Rick Westbrock
QMX Support Services


-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

Ron,
What version of Remedy and what version of Mid-Tier are you running?

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:28 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

** 

After some more testing, I can rule out the AL. I simply created a new
character field on both forms, gave them a default value, gave them
'display' for their entry modes, and changed their name/display from
'character field' to 'test field'. I added them both to their respective
'work detail' tabs in an open space for visibility.

 

Flushed cache.

 

In Chrome/FF, when creating a new record, the field on HPD:Help Desk has
it's default value that can be highlighted/copied/pasted etc. The field on
CHG:Infrastructure Change can do no such thing though it is accessible
within IE.

 

I'm still pretty green at this but that just seems stupid. Am I missing a
setting?

 

Thoughts?

 

Thanks.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 

** 

Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: New custom field oddity

 

** 

Hi all,

 

I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure
Change forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display
fields. Each one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL
is working fine as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is
browser based. Both fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field
works in FF and Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to
interact with it. I can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those
browsers.

 

Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting
that I'm missing?

 

Thanks in advance,

Ron 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers
Are, and have been for 20 years

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-26 Thread Steve Kallestad
You bring up a good point.

Flushing the cache from the mid-tier server will force a re-pull of the
object definitions from the Remedy server.

Just hitting save on the Remedy server doesn't necessarily mean that all of
the definitions are updated across the server group.  Each server in the
server group will pick up the changes when it notices, which is not
necessarily immediately.

It very well could be an issue where you are seeing slightly different
versions between the session.

However, there are small differences between the browser interfaces.  I
have never set about itemizing them because the differences are usually
innocuous.  Sometimes they are a bit bigger.  For instance, with one
release of mid-tier you can only multi-select table fields in certain
browsers.  This could be a situation where with this particular version of
midtier behaves slightly differently between browsers.

I just re-verified.  I have no problem seeing or copying read only fields.
 The behavior described sounds like a disabled field rather than a
read-only field.

Is this behavior being exhibited across other read only fields or just this
one?

I would do things like:

* re-creating the field from scratch (no copy/pasting)
* moving the field around
* deleting the functionality, clear the cache, go get coffee.  Recreate it,
go get coffee, flush midtier, flush browser cache, reboot my pc, try again.
* check client side logs to verify that there's no unexpected changes to
the field by workflow.
* spend some time querying the KB and reading release notes.  (maybe this
should be earlier in my process :) )
* having a look at things in something like firebug.


On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Rick Westbrock rwestbr...@qmxs.com wrote:

 Have you tried accessing the form with multiple user accounts? I have
 recently seen that sometimes when making a change to form fields that some
 users will see the change and others won't if only a simple MT cache flush
 has been done. We now stop Tomcat, delete the cache files and restart
 Tomcat
 to effectively rebuild the cache from scratch instead of just refreshing
 it.
 This seems to have resolved the seemingly arbitrary issues we were seeing
 for one subset of users one time, then a different subset of users another
 time.

 -Rick


 ___
 Rick Westbrock
 QMX Support Services


 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:36 PM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 Ron,
 What version of Remedy and what version of Mid-Tier are you running?

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:28 PM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 **

 After some more testing, I can rule out the AL. I simply created a new
 character field on both forms, gave them a default value, gave them
 'display' for their entry modes, and changed their name/display from
 'character field' to 'test field'. I added them both to their respective
 'work detail' tabs in an open space for visibility.



 Flushed cache.



 In Chrome/FF, when creating a new record, the field on HPD:Help Desk has
 it's default value that can be highlighted/copied/pasted etc. The field on
 CHG:Infrastructure Change can do no such thing though it is accessible
 within IE.



 I'm still pretty green at this but that just seems stupid. Am I missing a
 setting?



 Thoughts?



 Thanks.



 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:16 PM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity



 **

 Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?



 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: New custom field oddity



 **

 Hi all,



 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure
 Change forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display
 fields. Each one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL
 is working fine as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is
 browser based. Both fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC
 field
 works in FF and Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to
 interact with it. I can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those
 browsers.



 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting
 that I'm missing?



 Thanks in advance,

 Ron

 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

 _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_

 _ARSlist: Where the Answers

New custom field oddity

2013-02-25 Thread Peters, Ron
Hi all,

I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure Change 
forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each 
one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working fine 
as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both 
fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and 
Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it. I 
can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting that 
I'm missing?

Thanks in advance,
Ron

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-25 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi,

What exactly triggers the ACTL that fill in the fields?

What does your client side logging say? Have you compared the two?

Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se

 Hi all,

 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure Change
 forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each
 one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working fine
 as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both
 fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and
 Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it. I
 can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting that
 I'm missing?

 Thanks in advance,
 Ron

 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
 .

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-25 Thread Misi Mladoniczky
Hi,

The Window-Open and Window-Loaded does not happen that much in ITSM76 with the
Inline-Type form display used. The Display should always happen when you
search and display a new ticket though.

The way BMC has build the Inline forms for ITSM76, it pretty much hides/shows
the form you are currently accessing, but keeps the form loaded in a hidden
View Field.

The other thing that might be problematic is the Mid-Tier Cache. I have
sometimes had severe problems getting Inline form caches to be recached. I
suspect that you have something cached for the browser that is not yet
working. Either in the client-browser-cache or on the Mid-Tier server.

The client-side log I was talking about was what you see in Mid-Tier when you
turn on logging for a user. This is done in the User Preference form.

Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

 The AL's are triggered on display, window open, and window loaded. When you
 say client side logging, I hear user tool. Both of these fields work perfectly
 within the user tool if that makes any difference. Which log should be enabled
 for web clients? Is that mid-tier logging?

 Thanks,
 Ron

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky
 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:23 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: New custom field oddity

 Hi,

 What exactly triggers the ACTL that fill in the fields?

 What does your client side logging say? Have you compared the two?

 Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

 Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12):
 * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
 * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
 Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se

 Hi all,

 I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure
 Change
 forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display fields. Each
 one has an active link that gives the field its value. The AL is working
 fine
 as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having is browser based. Both
 fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the INC field works in FF and
 Chrome. The field is there and visible, but I'm unable to interact with it.
 I
 can't select/highlight/copy the field contents in those browsers.

 Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some setting
 that
 I'm missing?

 Thanks in advance,
 Ron

 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
 .

 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


Re: New custom field oddity

2013-02-25 Thread Pargeter, Christie :CO IS
Did you flush your MidTier cache after you added the field?

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peters, Ron
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:57 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: New custom field oddity

 

** 

Hi all,

 

I created a new field on both the HPD:Help Desk and CHG:Infrastructure
Change forms. They are both similar in that they are read-only display
fields. Each one has an active link that gives the field its value. The
AL is working fine as the value is correct on both. The issue I'm having
is browser based. Both fields work correctly in IE. However, Only the
INC field works in FF and Chrome. The field is there and visible, but
I'm unable to interact with it. I can't select/highlight/copy the field
contents in those browsers.

 

Any thoughts why one field works but not the other? Is there some
setting that I'm missing?

 

Thanks in advance,

Ron 

_ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years