For the purpose of keeping the inventory of your Filters to a lower number,
you could have it in a single Filter with multiple actions, the beginning
action(s) could manipulate the value as you need them to be, and the
succeeding actions in that same object, trigger the notification action
using the manipulated value.
Pretty much what Rod said actually, but if your question was, does it need
to be in a separate Filter - the answer is no. It should just maintain a
linear chronology, and each action will fire in the same linear sequence
they are defined in, as they all belong to a single Filter.
IF HOWEVER the values you are manipulating, exist in a display only field,
as the notification process is differed to a later stage, if you need that
notification action to retain the manipulated value during runtime, you
would then need to bypass Filter phasing, and have it execute in the order
that you created those actions, immediately without differing them using the
`! characters in the naming convention. Or use an additional action
Application-Pending-Release command action, immediately following the
notification action, as I believe it would do the same thing, if you do not
want to be bound by a naming convention, in case a change of code is
required later.
Cheers
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of shashidhar M S
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:16 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Query regarding SUBSTR() function
Hi Rod,
Yes I understand that. Many Thanks for the information!!
Cheers,
Shashi
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
