We're in the process of acquiring/building SRM 2.1 and so far, it's been
working pretty much as expected. A few bugs here and there and some
questions about functional design. Also, it's a bit cumbersome to
configure but that's because there's a lot of flexibility in the tool
that you may or may not need. Overall, we're satisfied (ask me again
after we rollout!!!)
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Smith
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service Request Management -Anybody using it?
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 000344E1852573DA_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Is anybody using BMC Service Request Management. Was hoping to get some
feedback on the product from people that are actually using it.
Thanks,
Chris Smith
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
--=_alternative 000344E1852573DA_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
**
Is anybody using BMC Service Request
Management. Was hoping to get some feedback on the product from people
that are actually using it.
Thanks,
Chris Smith
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___
--=_alternative 000344E1852573DA_=--
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"