At last nights CM the budget/bond discussion led me to make comment
about the large waste being displayed by both the City and the
Developers in electric consumption.
I brought to their attention the large number of industrial light
fixtures that are on utility poles, City property and the ConHall.
My point was that there are a lot of redundant, unneeded fixtures that
are costing everyone $$$ to operate. Some utility poles have 3
separate lights on them in the same location. The ConHall has
beautiful 1930s lighting that is being drowned out by unneeded flood
lights.
I asked who is responsible for the costs of publicly located fixtures,
my 3 minutes were up and there was no answer, on to business.
Later on during one of the Ordinance hearings I raised
'point-of-order' and demanded an answer. Finally got one..
The City pays the costs of lighting. That would be the taxpayers.
It would reduce our budget deficit to remove redundant lighting and
use only energy efficient fixtures. The developers would benefit
financially also to follow the same path.
Again, no comment or discussion from our leaders... Blank Stares.
Werner
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
