Evenhanded indeed. Thank you.
I could have stay'd here all the night
To hear good counsel: O, what learning is!-- Will Shakespeare
In a message dated 11/15/2007 5:51:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is good for the goose is good for the gander and I will be
evenhanded. I tok Paul to task months ago for including statements
about JK in his SUFA posts. My point was that they were not central to
the issue. Always stay on point.
I am not judging who is wrong or right here, but truthfully, I would
have liked the post from JK better had it not contained those
statements Paul takes issue with. I can see both sides of the coin.
Those comments are not central to the issue. The purpose of this
committee is not to prove anyone wrong or right, but to fix things
going forward. To include comments not central to the issue and that
persons could be on either side, diffuses its purpose.
Everyone (I assume) would be on the side of increasing revenues and
decreasing expenditures. But if appears to be an indictment of some,
then people, who might otherwise agree with its mission, oppose it.
I've said it before - we are all in the same boat. We better start
rowing together in the same direction.
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
