Re: [Assam] Petition to CM

2007-01-04 Thread umesh sharma
Rajen-da,
   
  Good initiative!!
   
  ***On behalf of the professionals Rajen Barua of Texas, USA signed the 
petition. The list of the professionals has also been enclosed with the 
petition.
   
  Umesh
  

Rajen  Ajanta Barua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   
  Coverage in Assam Tribune January 4, 2007
   
  Rescind Assembly decision on ‘Asom’
By A Staff Reporter
 GUWAHATI, Jan 3 – About 150 professionals living in different parts of the 
state, country and abroad have made an appeal to the Chief Minister of the 
state to rescind the state Assembly resolution on the change of the name of the 
state to Asom. For the purpose of changing the name of the state, they also 
advised the Chief Minister to set up an advisory commission with eminent 
citizens, academicians, historians, linguists, literary figures and the like 
and the members of the Assamese Diaspora, to have a transparent debate on the 
issue with public participation.

In their petition to the Chief Minister, these persons identified themselves as 
‘friends and well wishers of Assam living in and outside the State and country. 
They have also forwarded the copies of the petition to the President and Prime 
Minister of the country.

In their petition, they have stated that the December 15, 2006 resolution of 
the State Assembly was not supported by any argument or reason, nor any debate 
was allowed despite requests from the opposition.

They expressed their shock at the decision of the Assembly and registered their 
strong opposition to ‘this entirely unwarranted and undemocratic move on the 
part of the State Legislature.

For, the State’s name is not something for changing in as casual a fashion as 
it has been done, without a thorough and informed public discussion and debate. 
It has never a mandate of the people.

Moreover, the Legislature did not give a credible set of reasons for the change 
from the internationally well-recognised name ‘Assam’ to ‘Asom’. In these days 
of globalisation, to dilute and muddy Assam’s international name recognition is 
entirely counterproductive, argue the professionals.

They have also argued that there is clear historical evidence that the British 
did not introduce the name ‘Assam’. It was in use long before the British 
signed the Treaty of Yandaboo on February 24, 1826. The Britishers also used 
the word ‘Assam’ in the treaty.

Even from the Ahom Buranjis, it is found that the Mughals also used the name 
‘Ashyam’ for the State. The same is also evident from various historical 
documents of the Mughal period and the Dutch chronicles of the pre-British era.

In the Persian publications of the Mughal period, like the Akbarnama 
(1542-1605), Pashah-Namah (1627-1647), Alamgir-Namah (1657-1667) and Tarikh –I 
Mulk-I Asham, the name Asham is mentioned. On the other hand, the name Asom is 
not found anywhere in the pre-British period, argue the professionals.

In the map of the Kingdom Bengale (Kingdom of Bengal), drawn by a Dutchman 
named John van Leenen, who was in Bengale in 1661, also recorded the name 
‘Assam.’ The map was published around 1662 and currently preserved in the 
Maritime Museum, Rotterdam. 

In a letter sent by Joan Mertsuyker, Governor General of Dutch Batavia on 
August 29, 1663, he addressed Mirjumala as ‘General veldheer van den Grooten 
Mogol in Assam, Bengale’ etc. 

There is also a diary of a Dutchman published in 1675, which mentions the name 
of Assam and described its people as ‘Assamer’. The Dutchman fought alongside 
the army of Mirjumala in 1662. These are some of the written historical records 
of the existence of the spelling ‘Assam’ for the name of the State long before 
the advent of the British to it, claim the professionals.

They have also mentioned that according to many historians, the phonetic name 
‘Assam’ was derived from the Sanskrit name Shyam, the name of the Shan people 
who invaded and conquered the State in the 13th century AD. However, according 
to historian Baden Powel, the word ‘Assam’ might have been derived from even 
older original Bodo word ‘Ha-som’, meaning low land.

Thus it has been found that the phonetic name ‘Assam’ has been in existence for 
the past 800 years and has a strong connection with the coming of the Tai-Ahoms 
to the State, even if the possibility or an earlier Bodo origin of it is ruled 
out, argue the professionals.

They have also pleaded for protection and promotion of the unique ‘xo’ or ‘kho’ 
guttural sound of Assamese language as a linguistic heritage. This should not 
be allowed to be diluted by the ‘so’ sound being introduced through ‘Asom’. 
They have also argued that the duality of identity of the State as ‘Assam’ in 
English and ‘Oxom’ in Assamese would not rob or dilute the State’s unique 
cultural, linguistic and ethnic heritage. Even India has two identities – India 
in English and Bharat in Indian languages. Similarly, the English name of 
Pachim Bongo is West Bengal.

On behalf of the professionals Rajen 

[Assam] Petition to CM

2007-01-03 Thread Rajen Ajanta Barua


Coverage in Assam Tribune January 4, 2007

Rescind Assembly decision on 'Asom'
By A Staff Reporter
 GUWAHATI, Jan 3 - About 150 professionals living in different parts of the 
state, country and abroad have made an appeal to the Chief Minister of the 
state to rescind the state Assembly resolution on the change of the name of the 
state to Asom. For the purpose of changing the name of the state, they also 
advised the Chief Minister to set up an advisory commission with eminent 
citizens, academicians, historians, linguists, literary figures and the like 
and the members of the Assamese Diaspora, to have a transparent debate on the 
issue with public participation.

In their petition to the Chief Minister, these persons identified themselves as 
'friends and well wishers of Assam living in and outside the State and country. 
They have also forwarded the copies of the petition to the President and Prime 
Minister of the country.

In their petition, they have stated that the December 15, 2006 resolution of 
the State Assembly was not supported by any argument or reason, nor any debate 
was allowed despite requests from the opposition.

They expressed their shock at the decision of the Assembly and registered their 
strong opposition to 'this entirely unwarranted and undemocratic move on the 
part of the State Legislature.

For, the State's name is not something for changing in as casual a fashion as 
it has been done, without a thorough and informed public discussion and debate. 
It has never a mandate of the people.

Moreover, the Legislature did not give a credible set of reasons for the change 
from the internationally well-recognised name 'Assam' to 'Asom'. In these days 
of globalisation, to dilute and muddy Assam's international name recognition is 
entirely counterproductive, argue the professionals.

They have also argued that there is clear historical evidence that the British 
did not introduce the name 'Assam'. It was in use long before the British 
signed the Treaty of Yandaboo on February 24, 1826. The Britishers also used 
the word 'Assam' in the treaty.

Even from the Ahom Buranjis, it is found that the Mughals also used the name 
'Ashyam' for the State. The same is also evident from various historical 
documents of the Mughal period and the Dutch chronicles of the pre-British era.

In the Persian publications of the Mughal period, like the Akbarnama 
(1542-1605), Pashah-Namah (1627-1647), Alamgir-Namah (1657-1667) and Tarikh -I 
Mulk-I Asham, the name Asham is mentioned. On the other hand, the name Asom is 
not found anywhere in the pre-British period, argue the professionals.

In the map of the Kingdom Bengale (Kingdom of Bengal), drawn by a Dutchman 
named John van Leenen, who was in Bengale in 1661, also recorded the name 
'Assam.' The map was published around 1662 and currently preserved in the 
Maritime Museum, Rotterdam. 

In a letter sent by Joan Mertsuyker, Governor General of Dutch Batavia on 
August 29, 1663, he addressed Mirjumala as 'General veldheer van den Grooten 
Mogol in Assam, Bengale' etc. 

There is also a diary of a Dutchman published in 1675, which mentions the name 
of Assam and described its people as 'Assamer'. The Dutchman fought alongside 
the army of Mirjumala in 1662. These are some of the written historical records 
of the existence of the spelling 'Assam' for the name of the State long before 
the advent of the British to it, claim the professionals.

They have also mentioned that according to many historians, the phonetic name 
'Assam' was derived from the Sanskrit name Shyam, the name of the Shan people 
who invaded and conquered the State in the 13th century AD. However, according 
to historian Baden Powel, the word 'Assam' might have been derived from even 
older original Bodo word 'Ha-som', meaning low land.

Thus it has been found that the phonetic name 'Assam' has been in existence for 
the past 800 years and has a strong connection with the coming of the Tai-Ahoms 
to the State, even if the possibility or an earlier Bodo origin of it is ruled 
out, argue the professionals.

They have also pleaded for protection and promotion of the unique 'xo' or 'kho' 
guttural sound of Assamese language as a linguistic heritage. This should not 
be allowed to be diluted by the 'so' sound being introduced through 'Asom'. 
They have also argued that the duality of identity of the State as 'Assam' in 
English and 'Oxom' in Assamese would not rob or dilute the State's unique 
cultural, linguistic and ethnic heritage. Even India has two identities - India 
in English and Bharat in Indian languages. Similarly, the English name of 
Pachim Bongo is West Bengal.

On behalf of the professionals Rajen Barua of Texas, USA signed the petition. 
The list of the professionals has also been enclosed with the petition.___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org