Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?
Why do people find it so hard to reply to the same list on which the original message appears? I don't know that I've seen Dave on ASSEMBLER-LIST. On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:16, Gord Tomlin wrote: > Dave, can you repost your instruction sequences one above the other? For > me, they are garbled and I can't tell what the two sequences are. > > > On 2012-11-27 11:19, Thomas David Rivers wrote: >>For example, the following two instruction sequences are equivalent. >> >> STOCG 15,256(7),8 BC 7,SKIP >> STG >> 15,256(0,7) >> SKIP DS 0H >> I'd reconstruct it as: STOCG 15,256(7),8 BC 7,SKIP STG 15,256(0,7) SKIP DS 0H -- gil
Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?
Paul, I saw Dave's post here on ASSEMBLER-LIST and replied to it here on ASSEMBLER-LIST before I was even aware that Dave had also posted it on IBM-MAIN. Dave has posted here several times before, and FWIW I think his post was quite appropriate for ASSEMBLER-LIST. After all, one of his products *is* and assembler! -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software International (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507 On 2012-11-28 08:45, Paul Gilmartin wrote: Why do people find it so hard to reply to the same list on which the original message appears? I don't know that I've seen Dave on ASSEMBLER-LIST. On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:16, Gord Tomlin wrote: Dave, can you repost your instruction sequences one above the other? For me, they are garbled and I can't tell what the two sequences are. On 2012-11-27 11:19, Thomas David Rivers wrote: For example, the following two instruction sequences are equivalent. STOCG 15,256(7),8 BC 7,SKIP STG 15,256(0,7) SKIP DS 0H I'd reconstruct it as: STOCG 15,256(7),8 BC 7,SKIP STG 15,256(0,7) SKIP DS 0H -- gil
Re: Usefullness (or not) of STOC/LOC instructions?
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:45:29 -0700, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Why do people find it so hard to reply to the same list >on which the original message appears? I don't know that >I've seen Dave on ASSEMBLER-LIST. > >On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:16, Gord Tomlin wrote: > >> Dave, can you repost your instruction sequences one above the other? For >> me, they are garbled and I can't tell what the two sequences are. The OP (Thomas David Rivers) posted on both IBM-MAIN and here on Assembler, gil. Gord simply referred to him as Dave (which for all I know may be a fine nickname as far as the OP is concerned). -- Walt
