PDSE and HLASM together in z/OS 2.1
Hi Not so serious problem, in z/OS 1.13 we wrote our SYSADATA to PDSE and using 0M region size. In z/OS 2.1 all this jobs ended with an S0F4 reason x'24' and i/O error with SYSADATA After a PMR it turned out that the PDSE has not enough storage. We are using the default assembler OPTION SIZE(MAX) . In this case , according the book , the assembler gives back 128 K byte storage, but it is not big enough for PDSE. I will change the default SIZE, but maybe the assembler would gives back something more as 128K ? -- Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Miklos Szigetvari Research Development ISIS Papyrus Europe AG Alter Wienerweg 12, A-2344 Maria Enzersdorf, Austria T: +43(2236) 27551 333, F: +43(2236)21081 E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com Info: i...@isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111 Visit our brand new extended Website at www.isis-papyrus.com --- This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally binding. Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted. This email has been checked for known viruses, but ISIS Papyrus accepts no responsibility for malicious or inappropriate content. ---
What's the difference between...
I want to define a large field e.g. Long1DSBL1504What I want but you can't defined fields longer than 256 bytes, so instead I did: Long2EQU *,1504,C'B' What I need to code DS(L'Long2)B... Is there any real difference between Long1 and Long2, if not then why can't I use the simpler Long1 syntax? Robert Ngan CSC Financial Services Group
Re: What's the difference between...
Not really the answer you are looking for, but why not: Long1 DS CL1504 binary data (1 field of 1504 characters) The assembler should take that and doesn't really care what data you put in the field. Or you could try: Long1 DS 1504B (1504 1 byte values treated as one field) The first option is a 1504 character long value. The second is 1504 1 byte values treated as one field. I think the only real difference is the length value. In the first case L'Long1 gives you 1504, in the second I believe L'Long1 returns 1 but don't quote me on that (someone else will point out the error of my ways). Mark On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Robert Ngan rn...@csc.com wrote: I want to define a large field e.g. Long1DSBL1504What I want but you can't defined fields longer than 256 bytes, so instead I did: Long2EQU *,1504,C'B' What I need to code DS(L'Long2)B... Is there any real difference between Long1 and Long2, if not then why can't I use the simpler Long1 syntax? Robert Ngan CSC Financial Services Group
Re: What's the difference between...
I think it would be worthwhile to propose to John Ehrman that the maximum for BL fields be upped to 64 kibibytes - 1 (65535). This is already the [DS-only] limit for C and X data. (For DBCS G data it is 64 kibibytes - 2 (65534) for obvious reasons. ) John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
