Re: z/OS Bug Busterz SHARE Academy in San Jose

2016-11-16 Thread Ed Jaffe
That page has been corrected so the "Click to Register" button now goes 
to the right place...


On 11/16/2016 8:26 AM, Martin Truebner wrote:

To be percise the button for "register now" points to:

http://www.share.org/share-san-jose-2017-event-registration-start

which is wrong to some extent

Martin


Re: Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

2016-11-16 Thread Steve Smith
It would be sensible for EQUed symbols to assume all the attributes of the
"target" unless overridden.  But that's not what our forefathers did, and
it's not likely to change.  I suppose you could write a macro...
 MACRO
&name $EQU &X
&name EQU &X,L'&X,T'&X
 MEND

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tony Harminc  wrote:

> On 16 November 2016 at 07:48, Thomas David Rivers 
> wrote:
>
> >   - For an EQU instruction, the Addr2 field contains the length
> assigned.
>
> So it seems it indicates the length explicitly assigned, if any, but
> not the length of the EQUated-to item. Which is consistent with the
> behaviour that a symbol EQUated without a length has an implied length
> of 1, presumably for consistency with ancient practice.
>
> Maybe there's a call for a new option to allow EQU to take the length
> by default from the expression on the right. But this would probably
> break some (probably not much) existing code.
>
> Tony H.
>



-- 
sas


Re: Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

2016-11-16 Thread Tony Harminc
On 16 November 2016 at 07:48, Thomas David Rivers  wrote:

>   - For an EQU instruction, the Addr2 field contains the length assigned.

So it seems it indicates the length explicitly assigned, if any, but
not the length of the EQUated-to item. Which is consistent with the
behaviour that a symbol EQUated without a length has an implied length
of 1, presumably for consistency with ancient practice.

Maybe there's a call for a new option to allow EQU to take the length
by default from the expression on the right. But this would probably
break some (probably not much) existing code.

Tony H.


Re: z/OS Bug Busterz SHARE Academy in San Jose

2016-11-16 Thread Martin Truebner
To be percise the button for "register now" points to:

http://www.share.org/share-san-jose-2017-event-registration-start

which is wrong to some extent

Martin


Re: z/OS Bug Busterz SHARE Academy in San Jose

2016-11-16 Thread Philippe Cloarec
No way to register, by clicking on URL...not found  lol

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Ed Jaffe 
wrote:

> The z/OS Bug Busterz SHARE Academy in Atlanta was a tremendous success,
> but there was room for more attendees.
>
> Many folks complained to me throughout the week that they didn't hear
> about this amazing, Sunday deep-dive intensive until _after_ their travel
> plans were already made and asked if it could be offered again at a future
> SHARE event.
>
> Based on this demand, we've been given the go ahead to repeat this
> incredible offering at SHARE in San Jose!
>
> This time it's being announced well in advance, so people have adequate
> time to register and plan their trips accordingly.
>
> http://www.share.org/san-jose-academy-zos?utm_source=prospec
> tiveattendee&utm_content=academy
>
> "Back by popular demand! The SHARE Academy z/OS Bug Busterz class is
> presented by experienced z/OS Level 2 professionals and will provide you
> with the skills to analyze and make sense of diagnostic data captured by
> z/OS. You will gain the knowledge necessary to perform preliminary analysis
> of dumps and trace data using IPCS, and learn how to capture information
> through diagnostic tools, including GTF trace, CTRACE and SLIP. The class
> is designed for z/OS Systems Programmers and Application Programmers that
> support products running on z/OS, and will include a pre-event webcast. No
> prior IPCS experience is required."
>
> NOTE: There is great demand across the various SHARE Programs for Sunday
> SHARE Academy deep-dive showcase placement, so it's unlikely we'll be
> repeating z/OS Bug Busterz again after San Jose. If you or someone else at
> your company wants to take advantage of this training, this is your chance!
>
>
> --
> Edward E Jaffe
> Phoenix Software International, Inc
> 831 Parkview Drive North
> El Segundo, CA 90245
> http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
>


z/OS Bug Busterz SHARE Academy in San Jose

2016-11-16 Thread Ed Jaffe
The z/OS Bug Busterz SHARE Academy in Atlanta was a tremendous success, 
but there was room for more attendees.


Many folks complained to me throughout the week that they didn't hear 
about this amazing, Sunday deep-dive intensive until _after_ their 
travel plans were already made and asked if it could be offered again at 
a future SHARE event.


Based on this demand, we've been given the go ahead to repeat this 
incredible offering at SHARE in San Jose!


This time it's being announced well in advance, so people have adequate 
time to register and plan their trips accordingly.


http://www.share.org/san-jose-academy-zos?utm_source=prospectiveattendee&utm_content=academy

"Back by popular demand! The SHARE Academy z/OS Bug Busterz class is 
presented by experienced z/OS Level 2 professionals and will provide you 
with the skills to analyze and make sense of diagnostic data captured by 
z/OS. You will gain the knowledge necessary to perform preliminary 
analysis of dumps and trace data using IPCS, and learn how to capture 
information through diagnostic tools, including GTF trace, CTRACE and 
SLIP. The class is designed for z/OS Systems Programmers and Application 
Programmers that support products running on z/OS, and will include a 
pre-event webcast. No prior IPCS experience is required."


NOTE: There is great demand across the various SHARE Programs for Sunday 
SHARE Academy deep-dive showcase placement, so it's unlikely we'll be 
repeating z/OS Bug Busterz again after San Jose. If you or someone else 
at your company wants to take advantage of this training, this is your 
chance!



--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/


Re: Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

2016-11-16 Thread Ray Mansell

RAY   EQU   *,3

On 11/16/2016 07:48, Thomas David Rivers wrote:

Does anyone have an example where the Addr2 field
of an EQU instruction is _not_ empty?

- Many thanks -
- Dave Rivers -

--
riv...@dignus.comWork: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com



Rif: Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

2016-11-16 Thread aldo . crosio

addr2 is present when in a equ is indicated the implied length of the field
-LocObject Code  Addr1Addr2Stmt  Source Statement
 2922178=ret_entry   ds 0cl1
2922179=ret_elt ds cl8
29A2180=ret_typeds cl8
2A22181=ret_PROCGRP ds cl8
2AA2182=ret_ENV ds cl8
2B22183=ret_STG_NAMEds cl8
2BA2184=ret_SYSTEM  ds cl8
2C22185=ret_SUBSYS  ds cl8
2CA2186=ret_UPD_DATEds cl8
2D22187=ret_UPD_timeds cl8
2DA2188=ret_flagds cl1
2DB2189=RET_IN_NEWT ds cl1
2DC2190=RET_IN_TEST ds cl1
2DD2191=RET_IN_VALIDds cl1
2DE2192=RET_IN_PROD ds cl1
2DF2193=RET_in_fix  ds cl1
2E02194=RET_in_more ds cl1
2E12195=RET_end ds cl1
   0292 0050   2196=retr_area   equ
ret_entry,*-ret_entry

Aldo Crosio
tel:   051-4991812 /3488858416
fax:  051-6255762


CSE Consorzio Servizi Bancari
Società consortile a responsabilità limitata
Via Emilia n. 272
40068-San Lazzaro di Savena (BO)


Ai sensi del D.Lgs. 196/2003 si precisa che le informazioni contenute nel 
presente messaggio, corredato dei relativi allegati, sono strettamente 
riservate ed a uso esclusivo dei destinatari. Qualora Le fosse pervenuto per 
errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo immediatamente, dandocene gentilmente 
comunicazione. Grazie.
 ***  ***  *** 



Re: Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

2016-11-16 Thread Hardee, Chuck
Yes, here you go...

  Active Usings: None   

D-LocObject Code  Addr1Addr2Stmt  Source Statement  
HLASM R6.0  2016/11/11 09.23
0B50 0040   7223 WKCHAR0  EQU   
WKMSGWK0,L'WKMSGWK0,C'X' work area 0
0B90 0040   7224 WKCHAR1  EQU   
WKMSGWK1,L'WKMSGWK1,C'X' work area 1
0BD0 0040   7225 WKCHAR2  EQU   
WKMSGWK2,L'WKMSGWK2,C'X' work area 2
0C10 0040   7226 WKCHAR3  EQU   
WKMSGWK3,L'WKMSGWK3,C'X' work area 3
0C50 0040   7227 WKCHAR4  EQU   
WKMSGWK4,L'WKMSGWK4,C'X' work area 4
0C90 0040   7228 WKCHAR5  EQU   
WKMSGWK5,L'WKMSGWK5,C'X' work area 5
0CD0 0040   7229 WKCHAR6  EQU   
WKMSGWK6,L'WKMSGWK6,C'X' work area 6
0D10 0040   7230 WKCHAR7  EQU   
WKMSGWK7,L'WKMSGWK7,C'X' work area 7
0D50 0040   7231 WKCHAR8  EQU   
WKMSGWK8,L'WKMSGWK8,C'X' work area 8
0D90 0040   7232 WKCHAR9  EQU   
WKMSGWK9,L'WKMSGWK9,C'X' work area 9
0B50 0100   7233 WKMISCTR EQU   
WKMSGWK0,256,C'X'  use 1st 4 wk fields for misc TR table

Chuck

Charles (Chuck) Hardee
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
EAS Information Technology

Thermo Fisher Scientific
300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275
Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 (412) 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230
chuck.har...@thermofisher.com  | www.thermofisher.com

WORLDWIDE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, 
or an employee or agent of a system responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please inform the sender and delete all copies.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On 
Behalf Of Thomas David Rivers
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:49 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

In the HLASM documentation it indicates what
should be present in the Addr2 field of the listing.

In particular, it says:

   The field headed Addr2 contains the effective
   address of the last operand of any instruction
   referencing storage.
  - For a USING instruction, the Addr2 field
contains the value of the second operand.
  - For a CSECT, START, LOCTR, or RSECT instruction,
the Addr2 field contains the end address of
the control section.
  - For an ORG instruction, the Addr2 field contains
the next address as specified by the operand field.
  - For an EQU instruction, the Addr2 field contains
the length assigned.

Note that last statement, where it indicates the Addr2
field contains the length assigned for an EQU instruction.

I can't seem to get HLASM to actually do that; and
I've tried a few variants.  For me, the Addr2 field
of any EQU instruction is always empty.

Does anyone have an example where the Addr2 field
of an EQU instruction is _not_ empty?

- Many thanks -
- Dave Rivers -

--
riv...@dignus.comWork: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com


Addr2 field in listing for EQU statement?

2016-11-16 Thread Thomas David Rivers
In the HLASM documentation it indicates what
should be present in the Addr2 field of the listing.

In particular, it says:

   The field headed Addr2 contains the effective
   address of the last operand of any instruction
   referencing storage.
  - For a USING instruction, the Addr2 field
contains the value of the second operand.
  - For a CSECT, START, LOCTR, or RSECT instruction,
the Addr2 field contains the end address of
the control section.
  - For an ORG instruction, the Addr2 field contains
the next address as specified by the operand field.
  - For an EQU instruction, the Addr2 field contains
the length assigned.

Note that last statement, where it indicates the Addr2
field contains the length assigned for an EQU instruction.

I can't seem to get HLASM to actually do that; and
I've tried a few variants.  For me, the Addr2 field
of any EQU instruction is always empty.

Does anyone have an example where the Addr2 field
of an EQU instruction is _not_ empty?

- Many thanks -
- Dave Rivers -

--
riv...@dignus.comWork: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com