[Assp-test] Interface strange behavior 2.4.2 build 14085

2014-03-27 Thread use...@schani.com
I cant scroll the configuration List. The Menu does not jump to the
parameter

I clear all my Browsercache use FireFox 28 an the latest Chrome. All the
same.


Auf Bayrisch. Da bast wos ned

Christian

--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


Re: [Assp-test] Interface strange behavior 2.4.2 build 14085

2014-03-27 Thread use...@schani.com
The last parameter entry in List is /(noTLSIP)/ 

All after are not displayed

Christian

Am 27.03.2014 20:29, schrieb use...@schani.com:
> I cant scroll the configuration List. The Menu does not jump to the
> parameter
>
> I clear all my Browsercache use FireFox 28 an the latest Chrome. All the
> same.
>
>
> Auf Bayrisch. Da bast wos ned
>
> Christian
>
> --
> ___
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


[Assp-test] Download from ASSP version 2.4.2(14086) = ASSP version 2.4.2(14085)

2014-03-27 Thread use...@schani.com
sorry, am I supposed to tell or is not there necessary?

Christian

--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


Re: [Assp-test] Inbound TLS from gmail.com addresses / servers

2016-09-28 Thread use...@schani.com

There are a lot of ISP´s !

http://www.email-vergleich.com/tag/e-mail-anhang-grosse/

And if my Server doesent, my Customer leave.

Christian

Am 28.09.2016 um 18:59 schrieb Thomas Eckardt:

I'm still afraid of running into frequent problems with 25mb attachments

though.

25MB - I don't know anyone who allows this. Sending a link to a download
is much smarter.
ASSP_AFC has an option to do this for your outgoing mails! -
ASSP_AFCWebScript


Can someone else run a debug test with Gmail and TLS to see if you're

seeing these tiny packets too?

I've done it - same behavior - 1400 byte per SSL frame from gmail.



Would it be an easy modification to show the negotiated cipher in the

ASSP does this for years now - simply look in to the received header line
added by assp.

-- -- -- Received: from vs10241.internet1.de ([158.181.49.77]
helo=vs10241.internet1.de)
 by xx with SMTPS(TLSv1_2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) (2.5.2);
24 Jul 2016 05:34:12 +0200

if you set 'ConnectionLog' at least to verbose, you'll see the
SSL-negotiation results in maillog.txt.

info: started TLS-SSL session for client $cliIP - using
$Con{$ssls}->{sslversion} , $Con{$ssls}->{sslcipher}


what other options are there?

Set 'EnableHighPerformance' to very high.


Are you sure that negotiating a lesser cipher with Gmail wouldn't have

them switch to sending larger SSL packets?

Yes, I'm 100% sure.

An SSL peer is free to use any SSL frame size between 1 byte and 16kB.
There is no SSL-negotiation parameter for min or max frame size.
If gmail.com sends 1.4kB frames, they are free to do it this way. There is
no technical way to force them to send larger frames.


If neverQueue is set to 12MB, am I correct in saying that we're open to a

targeted exploit, say an .exe in a .zip as long as the email is more than
12MB?

Yes, you are correct.


or is that just after the whole message is received?

Yes, after the complete mail is received.

It is like it is - if the postman with his Ferrari is in a traffic jam,
you'll have to wait longer for your letter or you'll get it the next day.


Thomas



Von:K Post 
An: ASSP development mailing list 
Datum:  28.09.2016 17:03
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Inbound TLS from gmail.com addresses /
servers



Thanks again for the detailed explanation.

10% faster is terrific, and it's more than 50% faster since before 16270.
I'm still afraid of running into frequent problems with 25mb attachments
though.  Yes, that's too big for email in our opinion, but Gmail allows it
as do most ISP's these days.  It's not terribly unusual for us to have a a
person try to send and email with four or five 4 MB photos - and we can't
stop that trend.  That'll translate into a message somewhere in the range
of 22-25 MB.  I'm not sure if we're fast enough to >consistently< receive
these.  And on top of that, if it's an outside big wig, emailing an inside
big wig, they don't have 15 minutes to waste waiting for the big email to
arrive.  Then they yell at me, which is why I keep asking more of these
questions -- and there's a lot of them here (sorry)


*Are you sure that negotiating a lesser cipher with Gmail wouldn't have
them switch to sending larger SSL packets? * I have a solid high level
understanding of encryption, but once you get down the the packet level,
I'm a bit out of my depth, despite what I've learned from your excellent
explanations.


Can someone else run a debug test with Gmail and TLS to see if you're
seeing these tiny packets too?  I keep going back to *not being able to
believe that Google doing something that was any slower than necessary. *
They
try to optimize everything and are huge proponents of SSL everywhere.  If
they're sending tons of tiny un-optimized packets, there's got to be a
reason or cause.  I can't imagine that it's a default and deliberate
setting.  I tried calling US support, but this is a network engineering
type of issue - no chance of me getting through to someone there who even
understands the question.

The npSize option and neverQueueSize, only affects things after the whole
message is received right? * It's not like it's doing something
significantly extra at each SSL cylce is it except using up RAM right??*
  My unscientific tests are shower marginally slower speeds when receiving
large email from Google with TLS on and neverQueueSize set crazy high, so
maybe I'm wrong.  Being that this same message through outlook.com only
takes 30 seconds, even with npSize set to 0 (unlimited) and neverQueueSize
= 999,000,000, I'm wondering if the processing power and ram availability
(24 GB) on my assp box combined with low usage (only averaging 5000
messages a day) might be enough to have neverQueueSize really high to
always scan everything.  I'll play around there, but if neverQueueSize is
99MB, will things like ASSP_AFCDetectSpamAttachRe be slow WHILE the
message
is transferring, or is that just after the whole message is received?

If neverQueue is set to 12MB, am I correct i

[SPAM] Fetch POP Account won´t work

2016-12-29 Thread use...@schani.com
Hallo, i like to import a external POP Account an forward the mails to a 
other emailaddress.
In POP3 Configuration File i write:

POP3username=u...@domain.com,POP3password=xx,POP3server=leicht.info,SMTPsender=u...@domain.com,SMTPsendto=u...@leicht.info,SMTPserver=leicht.info,SMTPHelo=myhelo,SMTPAUTHuser=u...@domain.com,SMTPAUTHpassword=xx,POP3SSL=1,SIZElimit=25

But no emails come to the destination address.
Is my setup in the pop3cfg.txt wrong?

In the log i only found this every minute

Dec 28 21:16:53 mail assp[14499]: [Worker_1] Assp_pop3.pl version 
1.15 starting
Dec 28 21:16:53 mail assp[14499]: [Worker_1] POP3: using debug mode
Dec 28 21:16:53 mail assp[14499]: [Worker_1] POP3: collection 
process will start now


Thanks for help

Christian


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM] Fetch POP Account won´t work

2017-01-05 Thread use...@schani.com
Hello Thomas,

Sorry but it does not work:

sch...@schani.com:=POP3password=xx,POP3server=leicht.info:110,SMTPsendto=christ...@leicht.info,SMTPserver=leicht.info,POP3SSL=0

"sch...@schani.com" is the User Name of the POP Account. leicht.info is 
my Server with both Accounts (POP to get the emails, and ASSP to receive)

ASSP does not connect to the POP(dovecot) Server. No Log entrys in the 
dovecot logs.

In ASSP Logs:
Jan-03-17 22:59:49 [Worker_1] POP3: using debug mode
Jan-03-17 22:59:49 [Worker_1] POP3: will collect messages for user 
sch...@schani.com to  from host leicht.info:110
Jan-03-17 22:59:49 [Worker_1] POP3: collection process will start now

i see you have written more Infos in the actual ASSP Version 17002 about 
this. But it dosen´t work for me.

Christian

Am 29.12.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Thomas Eckardt:
>>Is my setup in the pop3cfg.txt wrong?
> What else should be the case?
> wrong syntax - READ the GUI again!
>
> I can't find a keyword 'POP3username' in the description. ---> Each
> configuration line begins with the POP3-username followed by ":=" : e.g
> myPOP3userName:=
> I don't know any POP3 server, which accepts SSL connection on the
> default port 110
>
> u...@domain.com:=POP3password=xx,POP3server=leicht.info:995,SMTPsender=u...@domain.com,SMTPsendto=u...@leicht.info,SMTPserver=leicht.info,SMTPHelo=myhelo,SMTPAUTHuser=u...@domain.com,SMTPAUTHpassword=xx,POP3SSL=1,SIZElimit=25
>
> Don't use 'SIZElimit', as long as you don't know the consequences! Is
> there any good reason to NOT collect mails above 250kB - instead sending
> a notification every time the pop3 collection runs?
>
> u...@domain.com:=POP3password=xx,POP3server=leicht.info,SMTPsender=u...@domain.com,SMTPsendto=u...@leicht.info,SMTPserver=leicht.info,SMTPHelo=myhelo,SMTPAUTHuser=u...@domain.com,SMTPAUTHpassword=xx
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:"use...@schani.com" 
> An:ASSP development mailing list 
> Datum:29.12.2016 11:14
> Betreff:[SPAM] Fetch POP Account won´t work
> 
>
>
>
> Hallo, i like to import a external POP Account an forward the mails to a
> other emailaddress.
> In POP3 Configuration File i write:
>
> POP3username=u...@domain.com,POP3password=xx,POP3server=leicht.info,SMTPsender=u...@domain.com,SMTPsendto=u...@leicht.info,SMTPserver=leicht.info,SMTPHelo=myhelo,SMTPAUTHuser=u...@domain.com,SMTPAUTHpassword=xx,POP3SSL=1,SIZElimit=25
>
> But no emails come to the destination address.
> Is my setup in the pop3cfg.txt wrong?
>
> In the log i only found this every minute
>
> Dec 28 21:16:53 mail assp[14499]: [Worker_1] Assp_pop3.pl version
> 1.15 starting
> Dec 28 21:16:53 mail assp[14499]: [Worker_1] POP3: using debug mode
> Dec 28 21:16:53 mail assp[14499]: [Worker_1] POP3: collection
> process will start now
>
>
> Thanks for help
>
> Christian
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> ***
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
> legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the
> use of the
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> ***
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
> ___
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test