'show channels' has also a problem related to this. It is very often showing wrong numbers.
Those are numbers that have been active some time earlier.
And these are the same incorrect extension numbers that 'zap show channels' show.


In other words ...
When you see numbers in inactive channels with 'zap show channels',
you can expect to see those incorrectly in 'show channels' as well.

--Pertti


Mark Spencer wrote:


Actually, "zap show channels" was Matt Fredrickson's project before he
left for his Mormon mission.  He should be finishing his two year mission
next March, so it might get completed then, or possibly earlier if someone
wants to actually determine what would be useful info to display and make
a patch :)

Mark

On 1 Jul 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:



Just so you know you aren't alone. I have similar things happening on my
system. I'm not sure how useful it is. I have used it to see what my
high water mark is.

I'm guessing in channels/chan_zap.c around either line 1590 or 1680
there needs to be a line added to set p->exten = NULL.

Steven

On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 17:13, John Todd wrote:


This odd output has always been the case on my particular systems,
and only now am I starting to think that something is amiss with the
"zap show channels" display:

gw3*CLI> zap show channels
Chan. Num. Extension  Context    Language   MusicOnH
  1 1410985012 pri-inboun
  2 1410985012 pri-inboun
  3 1301531972 pri-inboun
  4 1410985012 pri-inboun
  5 1410985012 pri-inboun
  6            pri-inboun
  7            pri-inboun
  8            pri-inboun
  9            pri-inboun
 10            pri-inboun
 11            pri-inboun
 12            pri-inboun
 13            pri-inboun
 14            pri-inboun
 15            pri-inboun
 16            pri-inboun
 17            pri-inboun
 18            pri-inboun
 19            pri-inboun
 20            pri-inboun
 21            pri-inboun
 22            pri-inboun
 23            pri-inboun
gw3*CLI>

There are _no_ active channels on this PRI (yes, I am _absolutely_
sure.)   This output, however, is confusing - why does it show that
certain Zap channels have calls?  When there is a call on Zap/1-1,
the output is identical.

JT
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev


--
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to