[Asterisk-Users] snom phones and redirect

2003-02-27 Thread Marian Danisek
Hello,

does anybody suceesfully setup snom phones with sip firmware with
asterisk to redirect call when phone is set to redirect if busy/ or
allways redirect ?
My console says :

chan_sip.c Line 3000 (handle response)
Dunno anything about a 302 Moved Temporarily from SIP...


regards 

Marian



-- 
SUNTEQ s. r. o.
Bojnicka cesta 35 # Prievidza # 971 04 # Slovak republic
Tel: +421-46-5430 754 # Fax: +421-46-5439 144
http://www.sunteq.sk/

A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Interest in E1 channel banks?

2003-02-27 Thread Michiel Betel
Very interested! Are you planning for european certification?(expensive!)
If so even more interested!

Florian Overkamp said:

 At 18:45 27-2-2003 +1100, you wrote:
Our company manufactures an E1 channel bank that is approved for use in
Australia (it should also be compatible with Euro standards). It is
 modular
and available in 10, 20 or 30 analog port configurations. Signal
 monitoring
and configuration is via Ethernet.

These units are manufactured in low quantities for specific telco
requirements. However if there was enough interest, we would be able to
manufacture and sell the units at pricing levels under US $2000.

So how much interest is out there?

 /me raises hand (well, we've done our current infra, but it may be a
 consideration none the less - at these levels of pricing)

 Florian


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: AGI and fast-entered DTMF codes

2003-02-27 Thread Alan Murphy

 Thats fine, didn't expect you to be able to measure it. The no pauses
 raises a bit of concern. There is supposed to be a set time between
 keypresses.  

It must be the phone I was using - which is an internal phone system
phone, rather than your average PSTN phone one would have at home. I
think my concerns were that if I could cause a problem like that with
that particular phone, random users could also cause this.


 If they are typing fast due to a contest, chances are they already
know
 that they can type faster than speed dial, but they can outrun the
telco
 and have problems. This is something I did back when I tried to win
 things from the radio stations. At one point I started using a modem
 that I could tune the pause and tone length till I was getting only
 about 10% failures. The time to dial was significantly faster.

Sorry, I think I explained that a bit wrong. People will receive a code.
Then they must call in and enter the code. Once that is successfully
verified in the database, they proceed to enter details (for example,
date of birth) and then record a short message. The contest is based on
the message they enter. Therefore, they will not be in a rush to type in
the code faster than others, but my fear was that they might be quick
typers and cause a dead line. Again, I used the same (obviously
incorrectly configured) phone to call another IVR service that seemed to
be able to handle these quick-fire DTMF tones, so I thought that it
could be an Asterisk/Zaptel problem, rather than a problem with that
particular phone.


 If it isn't recognised as DTMF, it is sent as audio. There wouldn't be
any garbage.

I see. Unfortunately, my telecoms experience is very limited (I only
really started using Asterisk about 4 weeks ago!), so forgive my
understanding of it! Would that audio cause Asterisk problems in that
case, if Asterisk were listening out for X DTMF digits, causing it to
bomb out of the GET DATA routine?

 Good, you didn't see that as the begining of a language holy war. For
2
 lines you are correct it should be plenty enough. As for the idea of
 building a multi threaded java server, do you want to tie the system
to
 another single process that could fail and take all lines down with
it?
 We have a app we have been working with, and rather like the idea of
the
 app starting and dieing on a per channel/per call basis so as to make
 sure the system is always respawning a fresh copy for a call. Our
 current software has threads that hang occasionally and tie up the
phone
 line till we interactively reset it. This is why I spend so much time
 with asterisk since it will eliminate that interactive reseting. 

Excellent point. My background is in the server-side J2EE arena and I
recently built a multi-threaded Java server to handle high volume SMS
messages routed through 3 network providers. This is a little bit of a
paradigm shift from what I was doing, as the calls through Asterisk are
interactive and the user knows if something is wrong and can redial. For
SMS messages, the user fires and forgets and if no reply is
forthcoming, does not know whether that is meant to happen, or the
message was lost. This would suggest that, with AGI, the most effective
way to go would be a single process that is created and destroyed per
call. It does require a trade-off between language functionality and
speed of development against the performance profile of that language.
Therefore Java might be a bit heavy handed in a large scale environment
on that basis.

As for the stability of a single server process, monitoring threads can
be put in place to ensure a process is in place. However, my preferred
way would be to allow the lightweight process that Asterisk calls first
to start or restart the server if communication fails. You might have
some extra delays, but for high volumes, the extra efficiency might be
worth the trade off.

Cheers for the help and sorry for going slightly off topic!

Alan.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] inbound isdn call

2003-02-27 Thread Iain Stevenson
Sounds like the i4l dtmf problem.  Assuming you are using i4l, the kernel 
dtmf detection routines are poor and quite frequently misinterpret speech 
as dtmf tones.  You need to patch asterisk to handle dtmf and i4l not to 
detect dtmf (or silence).  There are a few posts on this list about fixing 
this issue.

 Iain

--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:06 pm +0100 Marian Danisek 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

hello,

when call is made via asterisk from isdn line to the snom sip phones and
caller on isdn line is speaking loudly to the microfone, people on the
sip phones didnt hear voice but tones, like dtmf.
how can i firuge out this problem ? can echo cancel algorithm ?
best regards

Marian

--
SUNTEQ s. r. o.
Bojnicka cesta 35 # Prievidza # 971 04 # Slovak republic
Tel: +421-46-5430 754 # Fax: +421-46-5439 144
http://www.sunteq.sk/

A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] inbound isdn call

2003-02-27 Thread Iain Stevenson


--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:54 pm +0100 Marian Danisek 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

this mean that i need 2 different patches ? I already found isdn_audio.c
and isdn_audio.h patch... this is for i4l. You meat that i need another
patch for asterisk ?
If you want asterisk to handle dtmf then you need Pauline Middelink's dsp 
patch - isdn-dsp.txt - which was posted to the list in January.  This patch 
allows asterisk's dsp routines - the same ones used for the zaptel 
interfaces - to provide dtmf support for the ISDN line.  Without it, you 
will have no dtmf support if you apply the isdn-audio.c patch.

 Iain
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] logging all console output?

2003-02-27 Thread Martin Pycko
Yes, you can:
asterisk -vvvgcn|tee /tmp/log

regards
Martin

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

 hi

 can I log all console output while having console access as with

 asterisk -vvvgc

 ?
 --
 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
 ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
 Tel: +47 9801 3356

 Computers are like air conditioners.
 They stop working when you open Windows.


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hangup problems...

2003-02-27 Thread Jim Howarth
Hi Guys,

Its been almost a week now and I thought I would mention that this seems to
have fixed my problem completely.  Heh..  of course, the boss is smacking
his head against the wall over the fact that he didn't need the T1 card or
the channel bank, but.. we would have needed to upgrade in a year or so
anyway, so its no big loss.

Thanks again for your help!

Jim

- Original Message -
From: Martin Pycko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hangup problems...


 It should detect if the party that called in your
 X100P card hanged up. Then if asterisk hears fast busy
 it's going to assume that it's the proper time
 to hang up the channel. But in your case it's not working
 properly and it's hanging up when there is no fast busy.

 regards
 Martin

 On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Jim Howarth wrote:

  Yes, it was in there, I've commented it out and we shall see what
happens.
  Thanks :)
 
  Just curious.. do you know what that is for?
 
  Jim
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Martin Pycko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hangup problems...
 
 
   Do you have busydetect=yes in /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf ?
   If you do then comment it out and see if that helps.
  
   regards
   Martin
  
   On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Jim Howarth wrote:
  
Howdy,
   
We've been trying to get Asterisk to work properly for us and we
aren't
having much luck when it comes to simply speaking on the phone.  We
are
experiencing hangups don't occur at any specific time. The equipment
we
  use
are two X101P's and one T100P.  We originally tried with with the
USB
  S100U
as well (so channel bank isn't an issue).  Sometimes the caller will
be
completely hung up on and sometimes they will be spit into
voicemail.
  My
headset (if it matters) is a Plantronics S10 and the phone is a Bell
  Venture
3 line phone.
   
Has anyone experienced this?  If so, how did you fix it.  This is
  connected
to our tech support lines and as you can imagine, customers have a
  problem
with being hung up on - on a regular basis. :D
   
Thanks!
   
Jim
   
   
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom and Paging

2003-02-27 Thread Jeff Noxon
I forsee one of the following:

1) All phones on same paging system.  Uses 1 FXS port or a sound card
on the asterisk box.

2) Paging system addressable by groups.  Uses 1 FXS port per paging
group on asterisk.  (Plus 1 or 2 FXS for a 1/2 line phone)

3) Paging system addressable by phone.  Uses 1 FXS port per phone
dedicated to paging.  (Up to 3 FXS per phone, somewhat wasteful.)

Since this is my home system and I just want simple paging, I'm going
to go for option #1.

Obviously a digital phone would make a better solution, but that isn't
an option right now.

Regards,

Jeff

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:22:06AM -1000, James H. Thompson wrote:
 Are you going to need two ports on asterisk for each phone or does the intercom 
 connect outside of
 asterisk?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] snom phones with sip, at asterisk.

2003-02-27 Thread Andres Tello Abrego

How is the behaivor of the snom phones with asterisk?

Im thinking of getting 40 snom phones, to manage a voip solution...

How's the sound quality?



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom and Paging

2003-02-27 Thread asterisk
Jeff - If you make special phone cords that break out the 3rd pair at the wiring closet you can just 
join those all together in parallel and your paging will be * independant.

Bill

Jeff Noxon wrote:
I forsee one of the following:

1) All phones on same paging system.  Uses 1 FXS port or a sound card
on the asterisk box.
2) Paging system addressable by groups.  Uses 1 FXS port per paging
group on asterisk.  (Plus 1 or 2 FXS for a 1/2 line phone)
3) Paging system addressable by phone.  Uses 1 FXS port per phone
dedicated to paging.  (Up to 3 FXS per phone, somewhat wasteful.)
Since this is my home system and I just want simple paging, I'm going
to go for option #1.
Obviously a digital phone would make a better solution, but that isn't
an option right now.
Regards,

Jeff

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:22:06AM -1000, James H. Thompson wrote:

Are you going to need two ports on asterisk for each phone or does the intercom 
connect outside of
asterisk?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom and Paging

2003-02-27 Thread Jeff Noxon
Yes but I want * to be able to page me, announce queued calls, etc.

Basically glorified talking caller ID.  ;)

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:03:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jeff - If you make special phone cords that break out the 3rd pair at the 
 wiring closet you can just join those all together in parallel and your 
 paging will be * independant.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] snom phones with sip, at asterisk.

2003-02-27 Thread Wade Weppler
The SNOM 100's work ok with Asterisk, but the sound quality is poor on the
handset, and the speakerphone is unusable.  Apparently the latest revision
of the SNOM 100 is better, but I haven't used it.  The SNOM 200 is supposed
to be considerably better, and is only around $50 more.

-wade

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andres Tello Abrego
 Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:35 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] snom phones with sip, at asterisk.
 
 
 How is the behaivor of the snom phones with asterisk?
 
 Im thinking of getting 40 snom phones, to manage a voip solution...
 
 How's the sound quality?
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom and Paging

2003-02-27 Thread James H. Thompson
Do any of the SIP phones support intercom/paging?

Jim

James H. Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom and Paging


 Then use 2 lines per phone.

 You should connect 2 phones together ( the way they want specify ) and hook an 
 oscilloscope to the
 3rd pair.  It probably uses a simple signal to indicate page-intercom, maybe even 
 DTMF.

 You then need to rig a voltage convertor from telco batt voltage to whatever they 
 use ( probably
12v
 or less )


 Jeff Noxon wrote:
  Yes but I want * to be able to page me, announce queued calls, etc.
 
  Basically glorified talking caller ID.  ;)
 
  On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:03:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Jeff - If you make special phone cords that break out the 3rd pair at the
 wiring closet you can just join those all together in parallel and your
 paging will be * independant.
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Collect Digits for CO Blind Transfer

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Clark
I have a blind transfer feature available to me from my telephone 
provider and was wondering if asterisk can take advantage of this so 
that when a certain extension is called the user is asked for the 11 
digit pstn number they wish to call then asterisk flashes the line, 
dials the transfer codes and hangs up.  I have figured out how to do 
everything except collecting the digits from the user and then using 
them in the transfer codes.  Is it possible to do this with the 
asterisk dial plan?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Collect Digits for CO Blind Transfer

2003-02-27 Thread Martin Pycko
You can also do that using Background application:
[transfer]
exten = s,1,Background,some-file   ;it can be silence
exten = _XXX,1,Flash   ;collecting the digits
exten = _XXX,2,SendDTMF,${EXTEN}
exten = _XXX,3,Hangup


[called_context]
exten = 1000,1,Goto,transfer|s|1   ;magical number

regards
Martin


On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:

 Not to take away from your prize collection, but for now wouldn't that
 be trivial to do either as a patternmatch with assignment to a variable,
 or slightly less trivialy as a agi app that already has access to the
 getdata function?

 On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 17:42, Mark Spencer wrote:
  Sounds like we need an app_getdata (front end to the getdata function).
 
  I'll do it for any item in my thinkgeek wishlist  (you can search by
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] or by my name).
 
  Mark
 
  On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ben Clark wrote:
 
   I have a blind transfer feature available to me from my telephone
   provider and was wondering if asterisk can take advantage of this so
   that when a certain extension is called the user is asked for the 11
   digit pstn number they wish to call then asterisk flashes the line,
   dials the transfer codes and hangs up.  I have figured out how to do
   everything except collecting the digits from the user and then using
   them in the transfer codes.  Is it possible to do this with the
   asterisk dial plan?
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 --
 Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users