Re: [Asterisk-Users] record a conversation

2003-07-02 Thread Matteo Brancaleoni
show application monitor in the cli

Matteo.

Il mer, 2003-07-02 alle 09:22, Herv Thibaud ha scritto:
 hi
 is there a simple way to record a conversation with asterisk ?
 thanks
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app

2003-07-02 Thread Anton Yurchenko
Benjamin Miller wrote:

Would it be more flexible to approach this differently, with a dtmf to
indicate that the agent is done with wrap up?
So they get off a call and can wrap up the call for as long as
necessary, and then hit * or something that marks them as available
again rather than working against a timer to get a call wrapped up in 30
seconds or something, or shorting the timer because its always to long
or something?
Just my $.02 on the topic.
Ben
I`m looking forward to using * as a call center solution in future, and 
really excited about this thing. BUt I`m ashamed to say tham I`m not 
familuar with the terms, and what do wrap-up mean?

-Original Message-
From: Jim Friedeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app

Mark,
   How hard would it be to write a simple app to cancel wrap-up via an 
extension? Like dialing *99 to short- out the remaining wrap-up time?

Jim Friedeck

---

Mark Spencer wrote:

 

Should wrap up time be something associated with a queue, or with an 
agent?

Mark

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jim Friedeck wrote:



   

Will try to change to this:

Agent picks up phone and dials extension to 'login app':

 exten = 750,1,QueueLogin(QueueName, wrap-up-time)

This would allow for quick agents to log into a queue for faster 
processing and allow slower processing for slow agents. An agent would
 

 

simply log out if more time was needed. I could not think of a quick 
way to cancel wrap-up waiting. Our Inter-Tel has a programmable 
wrap-up cancel button. I don't think this would be very easy on POTS 
phones. Any ideas?

Jim Friedeck

--

TC wrote:

  

 

I have also contracted mark for some minor modifications to app_queue
   

 

and chan_agent
1) if you use a mixed environment of agents and devices on  a single
   

Q
 

 I want the ring process terminated before the time out value in 
queue.conf if the call is picked up
 by anyone assigned to the Q (device or agent)
2) if all agents are online when a new call comes into a Q, the 
current q logic will ring the devices for the timeout period
 before cycling and attempting to assign the called to a logged in 
agent ,
 I want the Q to attempt to assign a call  to an agent as soon as 
they hit the * key to hang up on the current call even
 if the ring process has started on the devices

I also have some in line comments here see %TC





   

To all who need more queue functionality,
We are contracting Digium to enhance the queue app for our call 
center

  

 

needs. Please read the following email conversation and give your 
ideas. Unless a glaring omission is found in my specification we will
   

 

have them start tomorrow (Wednesday). I may not have thought of 
something important. It will be released to all Asterisk users by 
Digium. Thanks for your time. %TC THANK YOU JIM



   

 If agent recieves call while logged in and call goes unanswered
 

 

for a specified amount of times (specified per queue) agent is 
logged out and event is recorded in CDR. Notification through 
astman interface would be desireable as well for management 
purposes.

  

 

%TC
Can we just make sure that specified amount of times  has a value 0
   

 

zero meaning forevever to stop agents automagically beling logged 
out by the system





   

 When agent picks up phone and is not on a local interface, a 
per-queue option to ask for confirmation by pressing a DTMF digit.
 

 

This tells queue that call will be handled by this agent.

  

 

%TC
Can this option be a configuration of the agent.conf NOT queue.conf 
seems to me that it is the agent who would like that discretion not 
the queue process that should enforce this rule
(I have already hacked this feature in chan_agent)





   

If not confirmed, a
per-queue option to log agent out or skip and place agent at 
bottom of queue. (Not really necessary but I could see it being 
useful for agents working from home with kids.)

  

 

%TC
again should this not be an agent.conf issue. also can we make sure 
the flag allows for 1-skip  don't change agent place in Q
2-skip  force to bottom of the Q
3-log them out



   

 Calls would be routed to the agent who took a call successfully
 

 

longest ago. This would be the fairest way to distribute them to 
the busiest people. People on a call unrelated to that queue would
 

 

maintain their position in the queue order unless they logged out.
 

 

A busy agent could be making outbound calls and it would be unfair
 

 

to penalize them for being unavailable due to outbound activity. 
Perhaps a per-queue choice for this.

 A per-queue specified delay after hanging up that would 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] record a conversation

2003-07-02 Thread Hervé Thibaud
and what the way to play records in the spool

Le mer 02/07/2003 à 09:28, Matteo Brancaleoni a écrit :
 show application monitor in the cli
 
 Matteo.
 
 Il mer, 2003-07-02 alle 09:22, Hervé Thibaud ha scritto:
  hi
  is there a simple way to record a conversation with asterisk ?
  thanks
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo

2003-07-02 Thread Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia
   I had a similar problem and solved it changing the params of input 
gain on my pstn-gateway, change from a value of 10 to a value of 1 and 
that eliminated the echo on the SIP Phones.

Dave Packham wrote:

Same prob here.   15 SIP phones only get eco when going to the PSTN...

if you find something let me know

Dave

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/1/2003 8:53:13 AM 
   

Hello,

I can't have asterisk working without echo when I place a call from IP

phone (SIP or H323) to a PSTN Phone. The called number as no problem 
with echo but there is a very audible echo in the SIP phone. This 
situation occurs either when connected with ISDN card thru i4linux 
driver and with my openline card from voicetronix.

Do you have any suggestion fo that?

Regards,

Daniel ANDRE

 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread John Todd
That's a different part of the equation.

If Asterisk could interpret the Via: headers like the Cisco phones 
do, that would solve the Asterisk-behind-a-NAT problem to a large 
degree.  Perhaps it already does; I've never tried putting Asterisk 
behind a NAT, only SIP clients.

JT


Please don't take the discussion of SIP interactions off list. I already
have NATed SIP clients working with *, but * still has problems where
its own external IP is not public and it is trying to use external SIP
services. A full discussion on list could spawn an Asterisk SIP FAQ -
and I think that would be a good thing.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Patrick
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 04:26, John Todd wrote:
 You may be correct about the Via: header, but you're incorrect in the 
 concept as to how it relates to Asterisk, notably in your reversal of 
 what side of the transaction is putting data in the Via: header to 
 make SIP work correctly.
 
 This is cluttering up the list.  Talk to me off line if you want a 
 better understanding of how NAT and SIP work with Cisco devices.
 
 Again, for those of you who might be trying to figure out what the 
 result of this conversation is:  SIP clients behind NAT works fine in 
 both directions (incoming and outgoing calls), Asterisk makes it 
 work, it's not using STUN.  Cisco devices work especially well.
 
 JT

Hi John,

Thanks for the very helpful info so far. I concur with Richard
Alexander's request to keep this discussion on list. 

How about Asterisk and NAT? Can you please comment if the examples below
also work.

1x SIP phone - NAT box - Internet - NAT box - Asterisk
10x SIP phone - NAT box - Internet - NAT box - Asterisk

The SIP phone(s) and Asterisk server are on private IP addresses. The
NAT boxes (e.g. adsl router) have a public IP address. Any requirements
for the NAT boxes like being a SIP proxy?

Thanks,
Patrick

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Klaus Darilion
 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:37:20 +1000
 From: Andrew Radke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT
...
 So I've started a really simple SIP and RTP proxy project, SaRP, on
 sourceforge.net. Yesterday we uploaded 0.2 of the perl based release.
 This is the first general release and should work for most people. We
 are using it quite successfully for standard calls between all sorts of
 NATed clients. All you need to do is forward UDP/5060 from your
 firewall/router to the box running SaRP if you want incoming calls to
 work and also allow UDP traffic from the ports listed in the config file
 out.
 
 The project can be found at http://sarp.sourceforge.net/


There is also a similar project called siproxd:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/siproxd/

regards,
klaus


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo

2003-07-02 Thread Dan
Hi,

What do you mean by pstn-gateway?
There is no input gain parameter in zapata.conf file?
It is about rxgain?

BR,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo


 
 I had a similar problem and solved it changing the params of input 
 gain on my pstn-gateway, change from a value of 10 to a value of 1 and 
 that eliminated the echo on the SIP Phones.
 
 Dave Packham wrote:
 
 Same prob here.   15 SIP phones only get eco when going to the PSTN...
 
 if you find something let me know
 
 
 Dave
 
   
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/1/2003 8:53:13 AM 
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I can't have asterisk working without echo when I place a call from IP
 
 phone (SIP or H323) to a PSTN Phone. The called number as no problem 
 with echo but there is a very audible echo in the SIP phone. This 
 situation occurs either when connected with ISDN card thru i4linux 
 driver and with my openline card from voicetronix.
 
 Do you have any suggestion fo that?
 
 Regards,
 
 Daniel ANDRE
 
   
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Andrew Radke
Patrick wrote:
[snip]
Hi John,
[snip]
How about Asterisk and NAT? Can you please comment if the examples below
also work.
1x SIP phone - NAT box - Internet - NAT box - Asterisk
10x SIP phone - NAT box - Internet - NAT box - Asterisk
This all depends on the NAT boxes that you use. The SIP phone. Whether 
the call is going out from or into the SIP phone. Whether the SIP phone 
is registered with Asterisk ot just making a call to it. Etc.

The SIP phone(s) and Asterisk server are on private IP addresses. The
NAT boxes (e.g. adsl router) have a public IP address. Any requirements
for the NAT boxes like being a SIP proxy?
Some brands of router will handle this virtually transparently 
especially if you register with the Asterisk calls and all conversations 
are directly with it.

Thanks,
Patrick
Regards,

Andrew Radke.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??

2003-07-02 Thread WipeOut .
Hi,

Has anyone worked out a way to use Asterisk in a Hot Desk environment??

I have not been able to think of a way for the user to have control over which IP 
phone will ring when that users extension is dialed without the user needing to 
reconfigure the phone..

Something like this would be cool..

User dials *8555 (or similar) and is prompted to enter their extension and then 
password, after successfully validating the user is then prompted for phone number 
(being some IP phone ID number or an external Mobile or Home phone number).. All calls 
made to that users DID number or extension are now routed to the registered 
destination device.. Any calls the user makes from any IP Phones carry the correct 
caller ID information as well..

Anyone got something like this or any form of user manageable extension control or hot 
desk type solution working?? Or any suggestions how it could be archived??

Later..
-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo

2003-07-02 Thread Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia
   I have a SIP FXO 8 port VoIP gateway, and it has a parameter called 
'input gain' wich is the one I modified, there might be a similar 
parameter on the configuration for the hardware you are using.

Dan wrote:

Hi,

What do you mean by pstn-gateway?
There is no input gain parameter in zapata.conf file?
It is about rxgain?
BR,
Dan
- Original Message - 
From: Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo

 

   I had a similar problem and solved it changing the params of input 
gain on my pstn-gateway, change from a value of 10 to a value of 1 and 
that eliminated the echo on the SIP Phones.

Dave Packham wrote:

   

Same prob here.   15 SIP phones only get eco when going to the PSTN...

if you find something let me know

Dave



 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/1/2003 8:53:13 AM 
  

   

Hello,

I can't have asterisk working without echo when I place a call from IP

phone (SIP or H323) to a PSTN Phone. The called number as no problem 
with echo but there is a very audible echo in the SIP phone. This 
situation occurs either when connected with ISDN card thru i4linux 
driver and with my openline card from voicetronix.

Do you have any suggestion fo that?

Regards,

Daniel ANDRE



 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Andrew Radke
Klaus Darilion wrote:
[snip]
The project can be found at http://sarp.sourceforge.net/


There is also a similar project called siproxd:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/siproxd/
regards,
klaus
It has a broadly similar goal on the surface but a very very different 
approach. siproxd relies on a large library. It tries to be completely 
SIP compliant (you can't be compliant and handle NAT). It leaves 
outgoing RTP traffic to go direct with inbound coming to it. It requires 
ports to be forwarded to it/opened for incoming RTP traffic (SaRP 
doesn't). It doesn't consider security. And lastly myself and a number 
of other people just haven't seen it work.

There are a couple of us that now actually use SaRP to develop SaRP (the 
old the compiler can compile itself test :-). It handles any sort of NAT 
that can get the SIP port to it (5060 or whatever else you want). It 
drops any packets that don't make sense and logs them; don't reply 
unless you understand a packet or you are just giving away information 
about your network or opening yourself up to an attack. And it's 
cross-platform. There is no way you'll get siproxd to run on Windows for 
example.

I'm not taking anything away from siproxd, I'm just stating why I don't 
use it and why I don't know anyone who does.

Regards,

Andrew Radke

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problems with musiconhold

2003-07-02 Thread Xisco



Hi evereybody,

I'm trying to use musiconhold during dial 
tones.But I only can call earing dial tones instead of music.

Now will see my configuration files.

AGI File(using AGI script to EXEC 
DIAL)

print "EXEC Dial Zap/g2/numberc||m\";
$res=checkresult();

Extension.conf

exten =_numberb,1,Answerexten 
=_numberb,2,SetMusicOnHold,defaultexten 
=_numberb,3,AGI,dial.agi

MusicOnHold.conf

default = 
quietmp3:/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3,-z

Note: Inside the directory 
/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3/ there are severals mp3 files.

Log File 
(/var/log/asterisk/debug)
Jul 2 12:27:34 DEBUG[630802]: File 
app_dial.c, Line 333 (dial_exec): SIMPLE DIAL (NO URL)Jul 2 12:27:39 
DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 1936 (zt_setoption): Set option AUDIO MODE, 
value: ON(1) on Zap/2-1Jul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, 
Line 1493 (zt_hangup): Hangup: channel: 2 index = 0, normal = 13, callwait = -1, 
thirdcall = -1Jul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 1846 
(zt_setoption): Set option TDD MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/2-1Jul 2 
12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 908 (update_conf): Updated 
conferencing on 2, with 0 conference usersJul 2 12:27:39 
DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 1930 (zt_setoption): Set option AUDIO MODE, 
value: OFF(0) on Zap/2-1Jul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File app_agi.c, 
Line 1216 (run_agi): Zap/1-1 hungupJul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File 
cdr_mysql.c, Line 58 (mysql_log): cdr_mysql: inserting a CDR 
record.Jul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File cdr_mysql.c, Line 61 
(mysql_log): cdr_mysql: SQL command as follows: INSERT INTO cdr 
(calldate,clid,src,dst,dcontext,channel,dstchannel,lastapp,lastdata,duration,billsec,disposition,amaflags,accountcode) 
VALUES ('2003-07-02 12:27:39','numbera','numbera','numberb','default', 
'Zap/1-1','','Dial','Zap/g2/numberc||m',5,5,4,3,'')Jul 2 12:27:39 
DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 1936 (zt_setoption): Set option AUDIO MODE, 
value: ON(1) on Zap/1-1Jul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, 
Line 1493 (zt_hangup): Hangup: channel: 1 index = 0, normal = 12, callwait = -1, 
thirdcall = -1Jul 2 12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 1846 
(zt_setoption): Set option TDD MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/1-1Jul 2 
12:27:39 DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 908 (update_conf): Updated 
conferencing on 1, with 0 conference usersJul 2 12:27:39 
DEBUG[630802]: File chan_zap.c, Line 1930 (zt_setoption): Set option AUDIO MODE, 
value: OFF(0) on Zap/1-1

If somebody can help I will be very pleasured, now 
I'm really lost.

Thks a lot.


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??

2003-07-02 Thread Gary
Actually its easier than you think...

Allocate a control extension for each hot desk user.

implement call forward and cancel call forward...

I did this with a ifo storage in the astdb so it holds during a
restart...

your dial plan must be macro'd for this to work properly...

have a look at junghans site   (I will get around to publishing my
complete solution when I finally sort all the functions out

On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:21:47 +, WipeOut . wrote:

Hi,

Has anyone worked out a way to use Asterisk in a Hot Desk environment??

I have not been able to think of a way for the user to have control over which IP 
phone will ring when that users extension is dialed without the user needing to 
reconfigure the phone..

Something like this would be cool..

User dials *8555 (or similar) and is prompted to enter their extension and then 
password, after successfully validating the user is then prompted for phone number 
(being some IP phone ID number or an external Mobile or Home phone number).. All 
calls made to that users DID number or extension are now routed to the registered 
destination device.. Any calls the user makes from any IP Phones carry the correct 
caller ID information as well..

Anyone got something like this or any form of user manageable extension control or 
hot desk type solution working?? Or any suggestions how it could be archived??

Later..
-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??

2003-07-02 Thread Tan Aks
How about the logon wizard of the snom 100? I think that does something
simlar to what you want. It's designed to allow different people to login to
a single phone.


- Original Message - 
From: WipeOut . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??


Hi,

Has anyone worked out a way to use Asterisk in a Hot Desk environment??

I have not been able to think of a way for the user to have control over
which IP phone will ring when that users extension is dialed without the
user needing to reconfigure the phone..

Something like this would be cool..

User dials *8555 (or similar) and is prompted to enter their extension and
then password, after successfully validating the user is then prompted for
phone number (being some IP phone ID number or an external Mobile or Home
phone number).. All calls made to that users DID number or extension are now
routed to the registered destination device.. Any calls the user makes from
any IP Phones carry the correct caller ID information as well..

Anyone got something like this or any form of user manageable extension
control or hot desk type solution working?? Or any suggestions how it could
be archived??

Later..
-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??

2003-07-02 Thread Simon Woodhead
The snom phones (and I assume others) allow you to have multiple SIP
accounts on a single phone. The user logs in to the phone which logs in *.
The downside is that you can only log in to accounts set up on the phone
rather than any account set up on * but is useful for shared desks etc..

W

- Original Message - 
From: WipeOut . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??


Hi,

Has anyone worked out a way to use Asterisk in a Hot Desk environment??

I have not been able to think of a way for the user to have control over
which IP phone will ring when that users extension is dialed without the
user needing to reconfigure the phone..

Something like this would be cool..

User dials *8555 (or similar) and is prompted to enter their extension and
then password, after successfully validating the user is then prompted for
phone number (being some IP phone ID number or an external Mobile or Home
phone number).. All calls made to that users DID number or extension are now
routed to the registered destination device.. Any calls the user makes from
any IP Phones carry the correct caller ID information as well..

Anyone got something like this or any form of user manageable extension
control or hot desk type solution working?? Or any suggestions how it could
be archived??

Later..
-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo

2003-07-02 Thread Iain Stevenson
rxgain and txgain are used, for example with the X100P.  As I understand 
it, the echo problem with a SIP to PSTN implementation in * has two 
components:

- echo resulting from the digital to analogue conversion at the X100P
- acoustic feedback within the handset used
The former is reduced by using the zaptel echo canceller set by this in 
zapata.conf:

echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
The choice of echo canceller to use is made when you compile zaptel.  mec2 
is the default.  You can enable aggressive cancellation in mec2 but this 
can be a bit too severe making calls sound almost half duplex.  Mec3 seems 
to be a bit unstable.

You can reduce feedback related echo by tuning rxgain and/or txgain.  A 
value of -3.0 will set the gain at about 70% of its initial value.

 Iain



--On Wednesday, July 2, 2003 3:40 am -0700 Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have a SIP FXO 8 port VoIP gateway, and it has a parameter called
'input gain' wich is the one I modified, there might be a similar
parameter on the configuration for the hardware you are using.
Dan wrote:

Hi,

What do you mean by pstn-gateway?
There is no input gain parameter in zapata.conf file?
It is about rxgain?
BR,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo



   I had a similar problem and solved it changing the params of input
gain on my pstn-gateway, change from a value of 10 to a value of 1 and
that eliminated the echo on the SIP Phones.
Dave Packham wrote:



Same prob here.   15 SIP phones only get eco when going to the PSTN...

if you find something let me know

Dave





[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/1/2003 8:53:13 AM 




Hello,

I can't have asterisk working without echo when I place a call from IP

phone (SIP or H323) to a PSTN Phone. The called number as no problem
with echo but there is a very audible echo in the SIP phone. This
situation occurs either when connected with ISDN card thru i4linux
driver and with my openline card from voicetronix.
Do you have any suggestion fo that?

Regards,

Daniel ANDRE





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread shepherd fungayi
Hi

I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop system instead 
of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a way that is 
convinient to the phone shop attendant?

Regards

Shepherd

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo

2003-07-02 Thread Dan
Hi,

In zapata.conf I have tried to change the rxgain and txgain parameters, but
without any success.
I think it is X100P card driver related issue.

BR,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo



 I have a SIP FXO 8 port VoIP gateway, and it has a parameter called
 'input gain' wich is the one I modified, there might be a similar
 parameter on the configuration for the hardware you are using.

 Dan wrote:

 Hi,
 
 What do you mean by pstn-gateway?
 There is no input gain parameter in zapata.conf file?
 It is about rxgain?
 
 BR,
 Dan
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with echo
 
 
 
 
 I had a similar problem and solved it changing the params of input
 gain on my pstn-gateway, change from a value of 10 to a value of 1 and
 that eliminated the echo on the SIP Phones.
 
 Dave Packham wrote:
 
 
 
 Same prob here.   15 SIP phones only get eco when going to the PSTN...
 
 if you find something let me know
 
 
 Dave
 
 
 
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/1/2003 8:53:13 AM 
 
 
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I can't have asterisk working without echo when I place a call from IP
 
 phone (SIP or H323) to a PSTN Phone. The called number as no problem
 with echo but there is a very audible echo in the SIP phone. This
 situation occurs either when connected with ISDN card thru i4linux
 driver and with my openline card from voicetronix.
 
 Do you have any suggestion fo that?
 
 Regards,
 
 Daniel ANDRE
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Gary
ok, I'll bite :-)

What the heck is a phone shop system  ??

On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 09:48:44 +, shepherd fungayi wrote:

Hi

I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop system instead 
of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a way that is 
convinient to the phone shop attendant?

Regards

Shepherd

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conference calls

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
You may want to check, but I think rtc is a x86ism and may not be
available to you on a mac.

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 00:54, Serge Mankovski wrote:
 I am trying to compile it  under Yellow Dog 3.0 on iMac
 I get this error
 
 zaprtc.c:1077: warning: implicit declaration of function `barrier'
 zaprtc.c:1078: warning: implicit declaration of function `cpu_relax'
 zaprtc.c: At top level:
 zaprtc.c:109: storage size of `rtc_irq_timer' isn't known
 zaprtc.c:719: storage size of `rtc_fops' isn't known
 zaprtc.c:107: warning: `DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD' declared `static' but never 
 defined
 make: *** [zaprtc.o] Error 1
 
 Any idea why?
 
 Thanks,
 Serge
 
 
 
 From: Klaus-Peter Junghanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conference calls
 Date: 01 Jul 2003 15:38:37 +0200
 
 Hi,
 
 if you dont have usb-uhci you can also use your realtime clock
 to generate zaptel timing. Make sure you dont have rtc support
 compiled into your kernel and grab zaprtc from:
 http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk
 
 regards
 kapejod
 
 --
 Klaus-Peter Junghanns
 
 CEO,CTO
 Junghanns.NET GmbH
 Breite Strasse 13 - 12167 Berlin - Germany
 fon: +49 30 79705392
 fax: +49 30 79705391
 iaxtel:  1-700-157-8753
 email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk
 
 Am Die, 2003-07-01 um 16.29 schrieb Martin Pycko:
   You need to look at show application meetme in the asterisk CLI
   but for it to work you need to have some kind of zaptel hardware or
   emulate it with zttdummy (but for that you need to have usb-uhci like 
 USB
   controller)
  
   and then
  
   exten = 1000,1,Meetme,1000
  
   Martin
  
   On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Serge Mankovski wrote:
  
Hi
I want to set up * as a conference bridge. I would like to be able to
conference is SIP calls (up to 12)
   
I am looking through all available documentation for * to get info on 
 how it
is done. No luck so far.
   
Can somebody direct me to the info in this subject?
   
Thank you
Serge
   
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
   
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 _
 Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.  
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??

2003-07-02 Thread WipeOut .
The problem with this solution is that you are moving the logic to the phone which can 
very quickly become an admin headache.. the more the config and admin can be central 
and server based the better..

 How about the logon wizard of the snom 100? I think that does something
 simlar to what you want. It's designed to allow different people to login to
 a single phone.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: WipeOut . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:21 AM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Hot Desks??
 
 
 Hi,
 
 Has anyone worked out a way to use Asterisk in a Hot Desk environment??
 
 I have not been able to think of a way for the user to have control over
 which IP phone will ring when that users extension is dialed without the
 user needing to reconfigure the phone..
 
 Something like this would be cool..
 
 User dials *8555 (or similar) and is prompted to enter their extension and
 then password, after successfully validating the user is then prompted for
 phone number (being some IP phone ID number or an external Mobile or Home
 phone number).. All calls made to that users DID number or extension are now
 routed to the registered destination device.. Any calls the user makes from
 any IP Phones carry the correct caller ID information as well..
 
 Anyone got something like this or any form of user manageable extension
 control or hot desk type solution working?? Or any suggestions how it could
 be archived??
 
 Later..
 -- 
 __
 http://www.linuxmail.org/
 Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
 
 Powered by Outblaze
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Soft SIP phones (with RING !!)

2003-07-02 Thread Dan
Hi all,

I have the M1500 Plantronics now and have done some tests with the Mitsumi
BT USB adapter.
The latest drivers from the Mitsumi site supports Headset Profile too, but I
still cannot use it with my dongle (cannot be activated).
Anyone else succeeded in using a BT dongle with Headset Profile supports?
The included BT receiver works very well, but it would be very nice to use
it directly with a BT dongle, (not using the sound card) with SJPhone or
X-Lite.


Thanks,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Soft SIP phones (with RING !!)


 Hi Gary,

  Mmm, but then I also have to have a sound card in the PC !!

 It seems that some new drivers for the BT-USB dongle supports Headset
 Profile too.
 I still wait for my M-1500 and then I will make a test with my Mitsumi
(TDK
 drivers)  BT-USB dongle.

 I'll keep you in touch if you are interested.

 Best regards,
 Dan

 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 1:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Soft SIP phones (with RING !!)


  On Sat, 17 May 2003 08:34:47 +0300, Dan wrote:
 
  Hi Gary,
  
   I am also looking for a USBBluetooth adapter which will work well
   with a a bluetooth headset with my mobile phone.
 
  Have you tried Plantronics M-1500? It is a Bluetooth headset with a
  bluetooth receiver with a 2.5mm jack for both mic and headphone. It can
 be
  used as BT headset with your PC through the soundcard.
  
  BR,
  Dan
 
  Mmm, but then I also have to have a sound card in the PC !!
 
  Considering that the machine I have this RDP session initiated from
  doesn't have ANY decent sound drivers which actually work with XP a USB
  headset is wanted, now if i could combine blue tooth and usb for sound
  from the computer that would be great, but alas, its seems not to be
  ;-(
 
  Gary
  .
 
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Seg Fault!!

2003-07-02 Thread WipeOut .
Hi,

I have just updated to the latest CVS version ( Approx 13:05 GMT Today ).. I am 
running chan_capi 0.2.2..

When a call is received Asterisk seg faults.. Not sure what information would be 
usefull to post so let me know what info will help to debug the problem..

Later..
-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Chris Mason
I'm very interested in the same thing for a hotel system I would like to
implement. Anyone know if the country codes be tied to a pricing lookup
table?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shepherd fungayi
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing


Hi

I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop system instead 
of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a way that is 
convinient to the phone shop attendant?

Regards

Shepherd

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Seg Fault!!

2003-07-02 Thread WipeOut .
Nevermind... After a reboot it appears to be happy again.. must just be a gremlin that 
crept in somewhere..

Later..

 Hi,
 
 I have just updated to the latest CVS version ( Approx 13:05 GMT Today ).. I am 
 running chan_capi 0.2.2..
 
 When a call is received Asterisk seg faults.. Not sure what information would be 
 usefull to post so let me know what info will help to debug the problem..
 
 Later..
 -- 
 __
 http://www.linuxmail.org/
 Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
 
 Powered by Outblaze
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conference calls

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
Never mind my previous post, A quick gogle search shows there is rtc on
ppc arch.

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 07:08, Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia wrote:
 Hi.
 
 How can I know if rtc support is built into the kernel ?
 
 Steven Critchfield wrote:
 
 You may want to check, but I think rtc is a x86ism and may not be
 available to you on a mac.
 
 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 00:54, Serge Mankovski wrote:
   
 
 I am trying to compile it  under Yellow Dog 3.0 on iMac
 I get this error
 
 zaprtc.c:1077: warning: implicit declaration of function `barrier'
 zaprtc.c:1078: warning: implicit declaration of function `cpu_relax'
 zaprtc.c: At top level:
 zaprtc.c:109: storage size of `rtc_irq_timer' isn't known
 zaprtc.c:719: storage size of `rtc_fops' isn't known
 zaprtc.c:107: warning: `DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD' declared `static' but never 
 defined
 make: *** [zaprtc.o] Error 1
 
 Any idea why?
 
 Thanks,
 Serge
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Klaus-Peter Junghanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conference calls
 Date: 01 Jul 2003 15:38:37 +0200
 
 Hi,
 
 if you dont have usb-uhci you can also use your realtime clock
 to generate zaptel timing. Make sure you dont have rtc support
 compiled into your kernel and grab zaprtc from:
 http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk
 
 regards
 kapejod
 
 --
 Klaus-Peter Junghanns
 
 CEO,CTO
 Junghanns.NET GmbH
 Breite Strasse 13 - 12167 Berlin - Germany
 fon:   +49 30 79705392
 fax:   +49 30 79705391
 iaxtel:1-700-157-8753
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk
 
 Am Die, 2003-07-01 um 16.29 schrieb Martin Pycko:
   
 
 You need to look at show application meetme in the asterisk CLI
 but for it to work you need to have some kind of zaptel hardware or
 emulate it with zttdummy (but for that you need to have usb-uhci like 
 
 
 USB
   
 
 controller)
 
 and then
 
 exten = 1000,1,Meetme,1000
 
 Martin
 
 On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Serge Mankovski wrote:
 
 
 
 Hi
 I want to set up * as a conference bridge. I would like to be able to
 conference is SIP calls (up to 12)
 
 I am looking through all available documentation for * to get info on 
   
 
 how it
   
 
 is done. No luck so far.
 
 Can somebody direct me to the info in this subject?
 
 Thank you
 Serge
 
 _
 Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
 http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
   
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
 
 _
 Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.  
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Andrew Radke
Instead of this make notes of some of the faults in SIP that cause you 
problems and start working towards SIP/2.1 or SIP/3.0. Just because you 
weren't one of the people involved in designing the existing protocol 
doesn't mean you can't work to change it.

SIP 2.0 has some unbeleivably braindead concepts in it. It is so loose 
that you can find one peice of info in half a dozen places in a SIP 
packet. It has no tightly defined structure and has no concept of how to 
work in a real-world network. Security wasn't truly even an afterthought 
which in the modern Internet environment is disgraceful and then there 
are the reasons you've given below.

This should not mean we just kludge everything together. A lot of stuff 
can be tidied up significantly and at least some of it can be thrown 
out. As such we should be working towards getting a new draft out that 
doesn't mean throwing out existing infrastructure but does allow for 
SIP/VoIP to move forward on the Internet not just corporate intranets.

Of course getting IAX accepted as an Internet draft and moving everyone 
on it would probably be easier than fixing SIP :-) but you fight the 
(small) battles you can win. Sorry if this sounds like a rant.

Regards,

Andrew Radke

Michael Kane wrote:

At the end of the day we all probably can get SIP and NAT to work together
if we spend  TIME configuring our NAT boxes and SIP devices to negotiate the
traversal of a NAT.  In the end result, the WAN IP must be is correctly
added to the contact table(sipd) or location table(SER), allowing the proxy
to route a call destined for that UA.  Now, my delima as a service provider,
is how do I document this for every SIP device out there where my mother can
purchase a UA device, plug it in, and start placing calls without putting on
a poodle suit and jump through flaming hoops.  That's why(for me) it becomes
an operational nightmare, not only to document vendor configs(if they
support NAT traversal), but, then support the end user on how to config
their devices.  That why I have looked into(implemented) such technologies
like STUN and probably will be forced to purchase a SIP aware firewall that
will spoof and re-arrange SIP messages destined for my proxy server.


Michael Kane
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
www.to-talk.com
508-295-2826
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Michael C. Cambria
Andrew Radke wrote:
 
 Ok I guess it's time for me to weigh in on this since I started the
 whole thing and am the main developer of SaRP.
 
 NAT and SIP _can_ work okay under very very restricted circumstance.
 Multiple SIP UAs behind one NATed IP _can_ work okay with a very
 intelligent router/firewall.

[deleted]

When Asterisk is running on the same device as NAT, does this make the
device an intelligent router/firewall?  

In other words, is the SIP proxy in Asterisk smart enough to translate
IP address  tcp/udp ports as needed?  Will it also add/remove rules in
the fw (or provide a hook for an external function/script to do so?)

Thanks,
MikeC
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Scott Stingel
Shepherd-

Having designed one of these in the past (in a higher level voice
environment), I can tell you that this is not a small undertaking.  It's at
least as much an SQL job as a voice task.

Usually the way to accomplish this is to establish more-or-less a pre-paid
phone card system, where the shop prepays an overall amount for
international calling access.  Then you have to time each call as it is
occurring, debiting each account, and the master account, in real-time. This
can be a bit complex when you have 20 or 30 calls going at one time.  You
have to cut them off promptly when the money runs out (big problem).  And
you have to provide call detail and charges to them at the end of each call,
using their own retail tariff.

To add to the complexity, each country has a different tariff from the long
distance carrier, and within the country, major cities often have special
rates per minute.  Mobiles have a different tariff too.  Phone card
platforms usually include a least-cost routing system which chooses a
carrier real time based on the call.  Tariffs change weekly and must be
updated in the system.

Anyway, I'm just scratching the surface!  I'll write more when I can!

Cheers
Scott Stingel


Scott M. Stingel 
Emerging Voice Technology Inc.

Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
URL:www.evtmedia.com http://www.evtmedia.com   



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 shepherd fungayi
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:49 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 
 Hi
 
 I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop 
 system instead 
 of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a 
 way that is 
 convinient to the phone shop attendant?
 
 Regards
 
 Shepherd
 
 _
 Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Friedeck
That would be excellent. Thanks.

Jim Friedeck



Mark Spencer wrote:

Could probably make '#' terminate wrapup time immediately or something.

Mark

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jim Friedeck wrote:

 

Mark,
   How hard would it be to write a simple app to cancel wrap-up via an
extension? Like dialing *99 to short- out the remaining wrap-up time?
Jim Friedeck

---

Mark Spencer wrote:

   

Should wrap up time be something associated with a queue, or with an
agent?
Mark

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jim Friedeck wrote:



 

Will try to change to this:

Agent picks up phone and dials extension to 'login app':

 exten = 750,1,QueueLogin(QueueName, wrap-up-time)

This would allow for quick agents to log into a queue for faster
processing and allow slower processing for slow agents. An agent would
simply log out if more time was needed. I could not think of a quick way
to cancel wrap-up waiting. Our Inter-Tel has a programmable wrap-up
cancel button. I don't think this would be very easy on POTS phones. Any
ideas?
Jim Friedeck

--

TC wrote:



   

I have also contracted mark for some minor modifications to app_queue and
chan_agent
1) if you use a mixed environment of agents and devices on  a single Q
 I want the ring process terminated before the time out value in
queue.conf if the call is picked up
 by anyone assigned to the Q (device or agent)
2) if all agents are online when a new call comes into a Q, the current q
logic will ring the devices for the timeout period
 before cycling and attempting to assign the called to a logged in agent
,
 I want the Q to attempt to assign a call  to an agent as soon as they
hit the * key to hang up on the current call even
 if the ring process has started on the devices
I also have some in line comments here see %TC





 

To all who need more queue functionality,
We are contracting Digium to enhance the queue app for our call center


   

needs. Please read the following email conversation and give your ideas.
Unless a glaring omission is found in my specification we will have them
start tomorrow (Wednesday). I may not have thought of something important.
It will be released to all Asterisk users by Digium. Thanks for your time.
%TC THANK YOU JIM


 

 If agent recieves call while logged in and call goes unanswered for
a specified amount of times (specified per queue) agent is logged out
and event is recorded in CDR. Notification through astman interface
would be desireable as well for management purposes.


   

%TC
Can we just make sure that specified amount of times  has a value 0 zero
meaning forevever to stop agents automagically beling logged out by the
system




 

 When agent picks up phone and is not on a local interface, a
per-queue option to ask for confirmation by pressing a DTMF digit. This
tells queue that call will be handled by this agent.


   

%TC
Can this option be a configuration of the agent.conf NOT queue.conf
seems to me that it is the agent who would like that discretion not the
queue
process that should enforce this rule
(I have already hacked this feature in chan_agent)




 

If not confirmed, a
per-queue option to log agent out or skip and place agent at bottom of
queue. (Not really necessary but I could see it being useful for agents
working from home with kids.)


   

%TC
again should this not be an agent.conf issue. also can we make sure
the flag allows for
1-skip  don't change agent place in Q
2-skip  force to bottom of the Q
3-log them out


 

 Calls would be routed to the agent who took a call successfully
longest ago. This would be the fairest way to distribute them to the
busiest people. People on a call unrelated to that queue would maintain
their position in the queue order unless they logged out. A busy agent
could be making outbound calls and it would be unfair to penalize them
for being unavailable due to outbound activity. Perhaps a per-queue
choice for this.
 A per-queue specified delay after hanging up that would allow agent
to get ready for the next incoming call. This might be deactivated by
agent dialing 'ready app' or some other convenient way.


   

%TC
again is this not realy a configuration item for the agent not the queue
process ???
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Asterisk-Users] H.323 Gateway Connection

2003-07-02 Thread Szymon Czyz
Hi Justin,

Try:

exten=242,1,Dial(h323/[EMAIL PROTECTED])


Regards,

Szymon Czyz

Justin Eckhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to setup Asterisk to allow users to dial out to the PSTN using a
 remote box supporting h.323. I'm using chan_h323.so, and I'm able to make
 outbound calls to a client like netmeeting with a line like this:
 
 exten = 242,1,Dial(h323/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
 
 And I'm able to receive incoming calls to asterisk. However I'm not sure how
 to route calls to the remote h.323 gateway. In my nave state I've tried
 something like this (xxx is the IP of the h.323 gw): 
 
 exten = 244,1,Dial(h323/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/PSTN-NUMBER-HERE)
 
 When I dial 244, nothing happens, this appears in the console:
 
 -- Called xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
   == No one is available to answer at this time
 
 Any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Justin
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Friedeck
Wrap-up, as our existing phone system calls it, is a period of time that 
an agent will not get an incoming call after hanging up the previous 
call. This allows time for the agent to 'wrap-up' the preceeding 
conversation by filling out forms, typing on the computer, or taking a 
sip of coffee. Most systems have a variable wrap-up time for different 
agents or queues and a way for the agent to indicate he/she is 
immediately ready to take a call (like a programmable button on a 
digital phone.) Since Asterisk deals with analog phones, there is no 
programmable button we can use.

Jim Friedeck

--

Anton Yurchenko wrote:

Benjamin Miller wrote:

Would it be more flexible to approach this differently, with a dtmf to
indicate that the agent is done with wrap up?
So they get off a call and can wrap up the call for as long as
necessary, and then hit * or something that marks them as available
again rather than working against a timer to get a call wrapped up in 30
seconds or something, or shorting the timer because its always to long
or something?
Just my $.02 on the topic.
Ben
I`m looking forward to using * as a call center solution in future, 
and really excited about this thing. BUt I`m ashamed to say tham I`m 
not familuar with the terms, and what do wrap-up mean?

-Original Message-
From: Jim Friedeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 
01, 2003 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app

Mark,
   How hard would it be to write a simple app to cancel wrap-up via 
an extension? Like dialing *99 to short- out the remaining wrap-up time?

Jim Friedeck

---

Mark Spencer wrote:

 

Should wrap up time be something associated with a queue, or with an 
agent?

Mark

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jim Friedeck wrote:



  

Will try to change to this:

Agent picks up phone and dials extension to 'login app':

 exten = 750,1,QueueLogin(QueueName, wrap-up-time)

This would allow for quick agents to log into a queue for faster 
processing and allow slower processing for slow agents. An agent would


 

simply log out if more time was needed. I could not think of a 
quick way to cancel wrap-up waiting. Our Inter-Tel has a 
programmable wrap-up cancel button. I don't think this would be 
very easy on POTS phones. Any ideas?

Jim Friedeck

--

TC wrote:

 


I have also contracted mark for some minor modifications to app_queue
  

 

and chan_agent
1) if you use a mixed environment of agents and devices on  a single
  

Q
 

 I want the ring process terminated before the time out value in 
queue.conf if the call is picked up
 by anyone assigned to the Q (device or agent)
2) if all agents are online when a new call comes into a Q, the 
current q logic will ring the devices for the timeout period
 before cycling and attempting to assign the called to a logged in 
agent ,
 I want the Q to attempt to assign a call  to an agent as soon as 
they hit the * key to hang up on the current call even
 if the ring process has started on the devices

I also have some in line comments here see %TC



   
  

To all who need more queue functionality,
We are contracting Digium to enhance the queue app for our call 
center

 

needs. Please read the following email conversation and give your 
ideas. Unless a glaring omission is found in my specification we will
  

 

have them start tomorrow (Wednesday). I may not have thought of 
something important. It will be released to all Asterisk users by 
Digium. Thanks for your time. %TC THANK YOU JIM

   
  

 If agent recieves call while logged in and call goes unanswered


 

for a specified amount of times (specified per queue) agent is 
logged out and event is recorded in CDR. Notification through 
astman interface would be desireable as well for management 
purposes.

 


%TC
Can we just make sure that specified amount of times  has a value 0
  

 

zero meaning forevever to stop agents automagically beling 
logged out by the system



   
  

 When agent picks up phone and is not on a local interface, a 
per-queue option to ask for confirmation by pressing a DTMF digit.


 

This tells queue that call will be handled by this agent.

 


%TC
Can this option be a configuration of the agent.conf NOT 
queue.conf seems to me that it is the agent who would like that 
discretion not the queue process that should enforce this rule
(I have already hacked this feature in chan_agent)



   
  

If not confirmed, a
per-queue option to log agent out or skip and place agent at 
bottom of queue. (Not really necessary but I could see it being 
useful for agents working from home with kids.)

 


%TC
again should this not be an agent.conf issue. also can we make 
sure the flag allows for 1-skip  don't change agent place in Q

Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Angelo Sampietro
i think that the problem could be something more easy:

it is possible inside asterisk to log all che calls of all the users
and know the timing and the number called for each call?
if it is possible to do that, could be possible to make a program
that takes this files and generate the costs reading the log
informations...

so for me the real question is: there is a log of all the phone call
that are made by asterisk?

Angelo



Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 3:28:22 PM, you wrote:

SS Shepherd-

SS Having designed one of these in the past (in a higher level voice
SS environment), I can tell you that this is not a small undertaking.  It's at
SS least as much an SQL job as a voice task.

SS Usually the way to accomplish this is to establish more-or-less a pre-paid
SS phone card system, where the shop prepays an overall amount for
SS international calling access.  Then you have to time each call as it is
SS occurring, debiting each account, and the master account, in real-time. This
SS can be a bit complex when you have 20 or 30 calls going at one time.  You
SS have to cut them off promptly when the money runs out (big problem).  And
SS you have to provide call detail and charges to them at the end of each call,
SS using their own retail tariff.

SS To add to the complexity, each country has a different tariff from the long
SS distance carrier, and within the country, major cities often have special
SS rates per minute.  Mobiles have a different tariff too.  Phone card
SS platforms usually include a least-cost routing system which chooses a
SS carrier real time based on the call.  Tariffs change weekly and must be
SS updated in the system.

SS Anyway, I'm just scratching the surface!  I'll write more when I can!

SS Cheers
SS Scott Stingel


SS Scott M. Stingel 
SS Emerging Voice Technology Inc.

SS Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
SS URL:www.evtmedia.com http://www.evtmedia.com   



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 shepherd fungayi
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:49 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 
 Hi
 
 I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop 
 system instead 
 of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a 
 way that is 
 convinient to the phone shop attendant?
 
 Regards
 
 Shepherd
 
 _
 Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



SS ___
SS Asterisk-Users mailing list
SS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SS http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
Angelo Sampietro
IT Manager
ARC Interactive

After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, 
Science and art tend to coalesce in esthetics, plasticity, and form. 
The greatest scientists are always artists as well.
 
Albert Einstein 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Seg Fault!!

2003-07-02 Thread rafa
We had the same problem, we fixed it downgrading the Capi version to
0.2.1b

Salut,


 -Mensaje original-
 De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de WipeOut .
 Enviado el: miércoles, 02 de julio de 2003 14:22
 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] Seg Fault!!
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I have just updated to the latest CVS version ( Approx 13:05 
 GMT Today ).. I am running chan_capi 0.2.2..
 
 When a call is received Asterisk seg faults.. Not sure what 
 information would be usefull to post so let me know what info 
 will help to debug the problem..
 
 Later..
 -- 
 __
 http://www.linuxmail.org/
 Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
 
 Powered by Outblaze ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asteri sk-users
 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Chris Mason
That's all I would need, it would be easy enough to work out the cost after
that.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angelo Sampietro
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Scott Stingel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing


i think that the problem could be something more easy:

it is possible inside asterisk to log all che calls of all the users and
know the timing and the number called for each call? if it is possible to do
that, could be possible to make a program that takes this files and generate
the costs reading the log informations...

so for me the real question is: there is a log of all the phone call that
are made by asterisk?

Angelo



Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 3:28:22 PM, you wrote:

SS Shepherd-

SS Having designed one of these in the past (in a higher level voice 
SS environment), I can tell you that this is not a small undertaking.  
SS It's at least as much an SQL job as a voice task.

SS Usually the way to accomplish this is to establish more-or-less a 
SS pre-paid phone card system, where the shop prepays an overall amount 
SS for international calling access.  Then you have to time each call 
SS as it is occurring, debiting each account, and the master account, 
SS in real-time. This can be a bit complex when you have 20 or 30 calls 
SS going at one time.  You have to cut them off promptly when the money 
SS runs out (big problem).  And you have to provide call detail and 
SS charges to them at the end of each call, using their own retail 
SS tariff.

SS To add to the complexity, each country has a different tariff from 
SS the long distance carrier, and within the country, major cities 
SS often have special rates per minute.  Mobiles have a different 
SS tariff too.  Phone card platforms usually include a least-cost 
SS routing system which chooses a carrier real time based on the call.  
SS Tariffs change weekly and must be updated in the system.

SS Anyway, I'm just scratching the surface!  I'll write more when I 
SS can!

SS Cheers
SS Scott Stingel


SS Scott M. Stingel
SS Emerging Voice Technology Inc.

SS Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
SS URL:www.evtmedia.com http://www.evtmedia.com   



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 shepherd fungayi
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:49 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 
 Hi
 
 I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop
 system instead 
 of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a 
 way that is 
 convinient to the phone shop attendant?
 
 Regards
 
 Shepherd
 
 _
 Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



SS ___
SS Asterisk-Users mailing list
SS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
SS http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
Angelo Sampietro
IT Manager
ARC Interactive

After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, 
Science and art tend to coalesce in esthetics, plasticity, and form. 
The greatest scientists are always artists as well.
 
Albert Einstein 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Kim C. Callis
There is a CDR (Call Detail Record) which is accessible in two different
ways. The first is via a simple comma delimited file which can be parsed
and fed into whatever database that you want. The second way is to dump
the CDR directly into MySQL, and extract accordingly. So the only trick
there is to create a database for billing and create a relationship that
will extract from the CDR database.

Kim C. Callis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angelo
Sampietro
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:06 AM
To: Scott Stingel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

i think that the problem could be something more easy:

it is possible inside asterisk to log all che calls of all the users
and know the timing and the number called for each call?
if it is possible to do that, could be possible to make a program
that takes this files and generate the costs reading the log
informations...

so for me the real question is: there is a log of all the phone call
that are made by asterisk?

Angelo



Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 3:28:22 PM, you wrote:

SS Shepherd-

SS Having designed one of these in the past (in a higher level voice
SS environment), I can tell you that this is not a small undertaking.
It's at
SS least as much an SQL job as a voice task.

SS Usually the way to accomplish this is to establish more-or-less a
pre-paid
SS phone card system, where the shop prepays an overall amount for
SS international calling access.  Then you have to time each call as it
is
SS occurring, debiting each account, and the master account, in
real-time. This
SS can be a bit complex when you have 20 or 30 calls going at one time.
You
SS have to cut them off promptly when the money runs out (big problem).
And
SS you have to provide call detail and charges to them at the end of
each call,
SS using their own retail tariff.

SS To add to the complexity, each country has a different tariff from
the long
SS distance carrier, and within the country, major cities often have
special
SS rates per minute.  Mobiles have a different tariff too.  Phone card
SS platforms usually include a least-cost routing system which chooses
a
SS carrier real time based on the call.  Tariffs change weekly and must
be
SS updated in the system.

SS Anyway, I'm just scratching the surface!  I'll write more when I
can!

SS Cheers
SS Scott Stingel


SS Scott M. Stingel 
SS Emerging Voice Technology Inc.

SS Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
SS URL:www.evtmedia.com http://www.evtmedia.com   



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 shepherd fungayi
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:49 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 
 Hi
 
 I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop 
 system instead 
 of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a 
 way that is 
 convinient to the phone shop attendant?
 
 Regards
 
 Shepherd
 
 _
 Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



SS ___
SS Asterisk-Users mailing list
SS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SS http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
Angelo Sampietro
IT Manager
ARC Interactive

After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, 
Science and art tend to coalesce in esthetics, plasticity, and form. 
The greatest scientists are always artists as well.
 
Albert Einstein 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Seg Fault!!

2003-07-02 Thread Marian Danisek
 We had the same problem, we fixed it downgrading the Capi version to
 0.2.1b

what's the diff between 0.2.1b and 0.2.2 ?

regards

Marian

 
 Salut,
 
 
  -Mensaje original-
  De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de WipeOut .
  Enviado el: mircoles, 02 de julio de 2003 14:22
  Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] Seg Fault!!
  
  
  Hi,
  
  I have just updated to the latest CVS version ( Approx 13:05 
  GMT Today ).. I am running chan_capi 0.2.2..
  
  When a call is received Asterisk seg faults.. Not sure what 
  information would be usefull to post so let me know what info 
  will help to debug the problem..
  
  Later..
  -- 
  __
  http://www.linuxmail.org/
  Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
  
  Powered by Outblaze ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asteri sk-users
  
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
SUNTEQ s. r. o.
Hviezdoslavova 9 # Prievidza # 971 04 # Slovak republic
Tel: +421-46-5430 754 # Fax: +421-46-5439 144
http://www.sunteq.sk/

A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Linejack strikes again.

2003-07-02 Thread Zara Trousk

Hi All,

Does anyone know if there has been any developments in asterisk to use LineJacks to 
dial out (connect to the PSTN)?

The card works perfectly with virtually anything else but asterisk.

Maybe the CVS versions have some work on it?

Cheers,

-Z

-- 
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread Angelo Sampietro
thanks a lot!
can you tell me where can i find more info about the CDR?
probably this will be the better way to give to the company a summary
with all the phone traffic :)

Angelo



Thursday, July 3, 2003, 4:37:32 PM, you wrote:

KCC There is a CDR (Call Detail Record) which is accessible in two different
KCC ways. The first is via a simple comma delimited file which can be parsed
KCC and fed into whatever database that you want. The second way is to dump
KCC the CDR directly into MySQL, and extract accordingly. So the only trick
KCC there is to create a database for billing and create a relationship that
KCC will extract from the CDR database.

KCC Kim C. Callis

KCC -Original Message-
KCC From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KCC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angelo
KCC Sampietro
KCC Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:06 AM
KCC To: Scott Stingel
KCC Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KCC Subject: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

KCC i think that the problem could be something more easy:

KCC it is possible inside asterisk to log all che calls of all the users
KCC and know the timing and the number called for each call?
KCC if it is possible to do that, could be possible to make a program
KCC that takes this files and generate the costs reading the log
KCC informations...

KCC so for me the real question is: there is a log of all the phone call
KCC that are made by asterisk?

KCC Angelo



KCC Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 3:28:22 PM, you wrote:

SS Shepherd-

SS Having designed one of these in the past (in a higher level voice
SS environment), I can tell you that this is not a small undertaking.
KCC It's at
SS least as much an SQL job as a voice task.

SS Usually the way to accomplish this is to establish more-or-less a
KCC pre-paid
SS phone card system, where the shop prepays an overall amount for
SS international calling access.  Then you have to time each call as it
KCC is
SS occurring, debiting each account, and the master account, in
KCC real-time. This
SS can be a bit complex when you have 20 or 30 calls going at one time.
KCC You
SS have to cut them off promptly when the money runs out (big problem).
KCC And
SS you have to provide call detail and charges to them at the end of
KCC each call,
SS using their own retail tariff.

SS To add to the complexity, each country has a different tariff from
KCC the long
SS distance carrier, and within the country, major cities often have
KCC special
SS rates per minute.  Mobiles have a different tariff too.  Phone card
SS platforms usually include a least-cost routing system which chooses
KCC a
SS carrier real time based on the call.  Tariffs change weekly and must
KCC be
SS updated in the system.

SS Anyway, I'm just scratching the surface!  I'll write more when I
KCC can!

SS Cheers
SS Scott Stingel


SS Scott M. Stingel 
SS Emerging Voice Technology Inc.

SS Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
SS URL:www.evtmedia.com http://www.evtmedia.com   



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 shepherd fungayi
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:49 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 
 Hi
 
 I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop 
 system instead 
 of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a 
 way that is 
 convinient to the phone shop attendant?
 
 Regards
 
 Shepherd
 
 _
 Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



SS ___
SS Asterisk-Users mailing list
SS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SS http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






-- 
Angelo Sampietro
IT Manager
ARC Interactive

After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, 
Science and art tend to coalesce in esthetics, plasticity, and form. 
The greatest scientists are always artists as well.
 
Albert Einstein 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linejack strikes again.

2003-07-02 Thread Bruce Ferrell
Which driver are you using?

Zara Trousk wrote:
Hi All,

Does anyone know if there has been any developments in asterisk to use LineJacks to dial out (connect to the PSTN)?

The card works perfectly with virtually anything else but asterisk.

Maybe the CVS versions have some work on it?

Cheers,

-Z



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ATA-186 de-register

2003-07-02 Thread Kim C. Callis








Is it just me or do others have a problem with the ATA-186
de-registering? Every couple of hours, if I dont make use of the ATA
connected line, I find that I have to unplug and let the ATA reboot. After that
it is good to go for awhile, but eventually I have to repeat the process. My
ATA sits behind a NATd firewall, any ideas what might
cause the de-registration?



Kim C. Callis








[Asterisk-Users] More switch = stuff

2003-07-02 Thread Eric Wieling
I have a two remote PBXs.  I use the switch = statement on each PBX to
point to the other PBX.

Now I want extensions on PBX-1 to dial extensions and PSTN numbers that
are local to PBX-2.

However, I ALSO want people to be able to dial into a Zap channel on
PBX-1 and be able to dial extensions on PBX-2, but NOT the PSTN numbers
that are local to PBX-2.

What would be the best way to do this?  Do I have to set up separate
users in iax.conf, one for using with a switch statement in the context
calls to the Zap channel lands in and one user for calls from extensions
land in?

-- 
BTEL Consulting
850-484-4535 x2111 (Office)
504-595-3916 x2111 (Experimental)
877-552-0838 (Backup Phone)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] More switch = stuff

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:36, Eric Wieling wrote:
 I have a two remote PBXs.  I use the switch = statement on each PBX to
 point to the other PBX.
 
 Now I want extensions on PBX-1 to dial extensions and PSTN numbers that
 are local to PBX-2.
 
 However, I ALSO want people to be able to dial into a Zap channel on
 PBX-1 and be able to dial extensions on PBX-2, but NOT the PSTN numbers
 that are local to PBX-2.
 
 What would be the best way to do this?  Do I have to set up separate
 users in iax.conf, one for using with a switch statement in the context
 calls to the Zap channel lands in and one user for calls from extensions
 land in?

I believe you can specify contexts with the switch command. If so you
can include a switch to an extensions context on the remote pbx in your
inbound context while using a more full featured context for calls
originating from inside. Look into that, if I am, then yes, you will
need to create the second IAX user in each direction. 
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linejack strikes again.

2003-07-02 Thread Zara Trousk

I've tried all versions (stable  CVS), even the latest new generation one (NIXJ) but 
no luck dialing out. All I can do is receive calls from the PSTN with it, but not 
making calls.
Can you dial out with a linejack?  Can you tell me how?

Cheers,

-Z


- Original Message -
From: Bruce Ferrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:21:28 -0700 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linejack strikes again.

 Which driver are you using?
 
 Zara Trousk wrote:
  Hi All,
  
  Does anyone know if there has been any developments in asterisk to use LineJacks 
  to dial out (connect to the PSTN)?
  
  The card works perfectly with virtually anything else but asterisk.
  
  Maybe the CVS versions have some work on it?
  
  Cheers,
  
  -Z
  
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] More switch = stuff

2003-07-02 Thread Eric Wieling
If you have to set up different users for the different contexts what'
the usefulness of having a /context on the switch = statement?

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:47, Steven Critchfield wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:36, Eric Wieling wrote:
  I have a two remote PBXs.  I use the switch = statement on each PBX to
  point to the other PBX.
  
  Now I want extensions on PBX-1 to dial extensions and PSTN numbers that
  are local to PBX-2.
  
  However, I ALSO want people to be able to dial into a Zap channel on
  PBX-1 and be able to dial extensions on PBX-2, but NOT the PSTN numbers
  that are local to PBX-2.
  
  What would be the best way to do this?  Do I have to set up separate
  users in iax.conf, one for using with a switch statement in the context
  calls to the Zap channel lands in and one user for calls from extensions
  land in?
 
 I believe you can specify contexts with the switch command. If so you
 can include a switch to an extensions context on the remote pbx in your
 inbound context while using a more full featured context for calls
 originating from inside. Look into that, if I am, then yes, you will
 need to create the second IAX user in each direction. 
-- 
BTEL Consulting
850-484-4535 x2111 (Office)
504-595-3916 x2111 (Experimental)
877-552-0838 (Backup Phone)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing

2003-07-02 Thread James Golovich
The mysql schema is available in the doc/cdr_mysql.txt file (from the
asterisk source dir)

James

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Kim C. Callis wrote:

 You can find the comma delimited file at /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv or if
 you are looking to do some easy querying on a database, you need to
 create a schema that I am sure someone on the channel has defined
 somewhere. At that point you clean up the /etc/asterisk/cdr_mysql.conf
 file to point to the appropriate database and authentication
 information.
 
 Kim C. Callis
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Angelo Sampietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:07 AM
 To: Kim C. Callis
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re[4]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 thanks a lot!
 can you tell me where can i find more info about the CDR?
 probably this will be the better way to give to the company a summary
 with all the phone traffic :)
 
 Angelo
 
 
 
 Thursday, July 3, 2003, 4:37:32 PM, you wrote:
 
 KCC There is a CDR (Call Detail Record) which is accessible in two
 different
 KCC ways. The first is via a simple comma delimited file which can be
 parsed
 KCC and fed into whatever database that you want. The second way is to
 dump
 KCC the CDR directly into MySQL, and extract accordingly. So the only
 trick
 KCC there is to create a database for billing and create a relationship
 that
 KCC will extract from the CDR database.
 
 KCC Kim C. Callis
 
 KCC -Original Message-
 KCC From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 KCC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angelo
 KCC Sampietro
 KCC Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:06 AM
 KCC To: Scott Stingel
 KCC Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 KCC Subject: Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
 
 KCC i think that the problem could be something more easy:
 
 KCC it is possible inside asterisk to log all che calls of all the
 users
 KCC and know the timing and the number called for each call?
 KCC if it is possible to do that, could be possible to make a program
 KCC that takes this files and generate the costs reading the log
 KCC informations...
 
 KCC so for me the real question is: there is a log of all the phone
 call
 KCC that are made by asterisk?
 
 KCC Angelo
 
 
 
 KCC Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 3:28:22 PM, you wrote:
 
 SS Shepherd-
 
 SS Having designed one of these in the past (in a higher level voice
 SS environment), I can tell you that this is not a small undertaking.
 KCC It's at
 SS least as much an SQL job as a voice task.
 
 SS Usually the way to accomplish this is to establish more-or-less a
 KCC pre-paid
 SS phone card system, where the shop prepays an overall amount for
 SS international calling access.  Then you have to time each call as
 it
 KCC is
 SS occurring, debiting each account, and the master account, in
 KCC real-time. This
 SS can be a bit complex when you have 20 or 30 calls going at one
 time.
 KCC You
 SS have to cut them off promptly when the money runs out (big
 problem).
 KCC And
 SS you have to provide call detail and charges to them at the end of
 KCC each call,
 SS using their own retail tariff.
 
 SS To add to the complexity, each country has a different tariff from
 KCC the long
 SS distance carrier, and within the country, major cities often have
 KCC special
 SS rates per minute.  Mobiles have a different tariff too.  Phone card
 SS platforms usually include a least-cost routing system which chooses
 KCC a
 SS carrier real time based on the call.  Tariffs change weekly and
 must
 KCC be
 SS updated in the system.
 
 SS Anyway, I'm just scratching the surface!  I'll write more when I
 KCC can!
 
 SS Cheers
 SS Scott Stingel
 
 
 SS Scott M. Stingel 
 SS Emerging Voice Technology Inc.
 
 SS Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 SS URL:www.evtmedia.com http://www.evtmedia.com   
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  shepherd fungayi
  Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:49 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk PBX Billing
  
  
  Hi
  
  I would like to use the Asterisk PBX as part of a phone shop 
  system instead 
  of the usual PBX plus PC. How can I do the the billing in a 
  way that is 
  convinient to the phone shop attendant?
  
  Regards
  
  Shepherd
  
  _
  Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
  http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
 
 
 
 SS ___
 SS Asterisk-Users mailing list
 SS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SS http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Angelo Sampietro
 IT Manager
 ARC Interactive
 
 After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, 
 Science and art tend to coalesce in esthetics, 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linejack strikes again.

2003-07-02 Thread Andres Tello Abrego


No, u CANT dial out with a linejack...

I have 2 of them, I use them as incoming only lines, and x100p for
incoming, outgoing lines...

There is no bug about this, is a feature, that isn't present at the
linejack.



On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Zara Trousk wrote:


 I've tried all versions (stable  CVS), even the latest new generation one (NIXJ) 
 but no luck dialing out. All I can do is receive calls from the PSTN with it, but 
 not making calls.
 Can you dial out with a linejack?  Can you tell me how?

 Cheers,

 -Z


 - Original Message -
 From: Bruce Ferrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 08:21:28 -0700
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linejack strikes again.

  Which driver are you using?
 
  Zara Trousk wrote:
   Hi All,
  
   Does anyone know if there has been any developments in asterisk to use LineJacks 
   to dial out (connect to the PSTN)?
  
   The card works perfectly with virtually anything else but asterisk.
  
   Maybe the CVS versions have some work on it?
  
   Cheers,
  
   -Z
  
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 --
 __
 Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
 http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] More switch = stuff

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
Sorry, that last sentence I had put in there was a thought interupted by
my normal job. I meant for you to do the little research into adding the
context to the end of your switch statement, and if I was wrong then go
about the adding of users.
 

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 11:02, Eric Wieling wrote:
 If you have to set up different users for the different contexts what'
 the usefulness of having a /context on the switch = statement?
 
 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:47, Steven Critchfield wrote:
  On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:36, Eric Wieling wrote:
   I have a two remote PBXs.  I use the switch = statement on each PBX to
   point to the other PBX.
   
   Now I want extensions on PBX-1 to dial extensions and PSTN numbers that
   are local to PBX-2.
   
   However, I ALSO want people to be able to dial into a Zap channel on
   PBX-1 and be able to dial extensions on PBX-2, but NOT the PSTN numbers
   that are local to PBX-2.
   
   What would be the best way to do this?  Do I have to set up separate
   users in iax.conf, one for using with a switch statement in the context
   calls to the Zap channel lands in and one user for calls from extensions
   land in?
  
  I believe you can specify contexts with the switch command. If so you
  can include a switch to an extensions context on the remote pbx in your
  inbound context while using a more full featured context for calls
  originating from inside. Look into that, if I am, then yes, you will
  need to create the second IAX user in each direction. 
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app

2003-07-02 Thread Richard Lyman
or the agent sets a 'disposition' for that call, before it will
exit wrapup and place back in queue.

Jim Friedeck wrote:
 
 Wrap-up, as our existing phone system calls it, is a period of time that
 an agent will not get an incoming call after hanging up the previous
 call. This allows time for the agent to 'wrap-up' the preceeding
 conversation by filling out forms, typing on the computer, or taking a
 sip of coffee. Most systems have a variable wrap-up time for different
 agents or queues and a way for the agent to indicate he/she is
 immediately ready to take a call (like a programmable button on a
 digital phone.) Since Asterisk deals with analog phones, there is no
 programmable button we can use.
 
 Jim Friedeck
 
 --
 
 Anton Yurchenko wrote:
 
  Benjamin Miller wrote:
 
  Would it be more flexible to approach this differently, with a dtmf to
  indicate that the agent is done with wrap up?
  So they get off a call and can wrap up the call for as long as
  necessary, and then hit * or something that marks them as available
  again rather than working against a timer to get a call wrapped up in 30
  seconds or something, or shorting the timer because its always to long
  or something?
  Just my $.02 on the topic.
  Ben
 
  I`m looking forward to using * as a call center solution in future,
  and really excited about this thing. BUt I`m ashamed to say tham I`m
  not familuar with the terms, and what do wrap-up mean?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Friedeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July
  01, 2003 3:52 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Enhanced queue app
 
 
  Mark,
 How hard would it be to write a simple app to cancel wrap-up via
  an extension? Like dialing *99 to short- out the remaining wrap-up time?
 
  Jim Friedeck
 
  ---
 
  Mark Spencer wrote:
 
 
 
  Should wrap up time be something associated with a queue, or with an
  agent?
 
  Mark
 
  On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jim Friedeck wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
  Will try to change to this:
 
  Agent picks up phone and dials extension to 'login app':
 
   exten = 750,1,QueueLogin(QueueName, wrap-up-time)
 
  This would allow for quick agents to log into a queue for faster
  processing and allow slower processing for slow agents. An agent would
 
 
 
 
 
  simply log out if more time was needed. I could not think of a
  quick way to cancel wrap-up waiting. Our Inter-Tel has a
  programmable wrap-up cancel button. I don't think this would be
  very easy on POTS phones. Any ideas?
 
  Jim Friedeck
 
  --
 
  TC wrote:
 
 
 
 
  I have also contracted mark for some minor modifications to app_queue
 
 
 
 
 
  and chan_agent
  1) if you use a mixed environment of agents and devices on  a single
 
 
  Q
 
 
   I want the ring process terminated before the time out value in
  queue.conf if the call is picked up
   by anyone assigned to the Q (device or agent)
  2) if all agents are online when a new call comes into a Q, the
  current q logic will ring the devices for the timeout period
   before cycling and attempting to assign the called to a logged in
  agent ,
   I want the Q to attempt to assign a call  to an agent as soon as
  they hit the * key to hang up on the current call even
   if the ring process has started on the devices
 
  I also have some in line comments here see %TC
 
 
 
 
 
 
  To all who need more queue functionality,
  We are contracting Digium to enhance the queue app for our call
  center
 
 
 
 
 
  needs. Please read the following email conversation and give your
  ideas. Unless a glaring omission is found in my specification we will
 
 
 
 
 
  have them start tomorrow (Wednesday). I may not have thought of
  something important. It will be released to all Asterisk users by
  Digium. Thanks for your time. %TC THANK YOU JIM
 
 
 
 
 
   If agent recieves call while logged in and call goes unanswered
 
 
 
 
 
  for a specified amount of times (specified per queue) agent is
  logged out and event is recorded in CDR. Notification through
  astman interface would be desireable as well for management
  purposes.
 
 
 
 
 
  %TC
  Can we just make sure that specified amount of times  has a value 0
 
 
 
 
 
  zero meaning forevever to stop agents automagically beling
  logged out by the system
 
 
 
 
 
 
   When agent picks up phone and is not on a local interface, a
  per-queue option to ask for confirmation by pressing a DTMF digit.
 
 
 
 
 
  This tells queue that call will be handled by this agent.
 
 
 
 
 
  %TC
  Can this option be a configuration of the agent.conf NOT
  queue.conf seems to me that it is the agent who would like that
  discretion not the queue process that should enforce this rule
  (I have already hacked this feature in chan_agent)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  If not confirmed, a
  per-queue option to log agent out or skip and place agent at
  bottom of queue. (Not really necessary 

[Asterisk-Users] Dialout Lines ???

2003-07-02 Thread Bradley Greep
I've been reading the Linejack strikes again messages, and have another Newbie question

is it possible to use a Voip Product as a Dialout line for * ?
I have a Vegastream 100 Voip to PRI. box. With * can I use that as a Dialout / dialin 
box?
The Vega100 does either sip or h.323.

Thanks.
Bradley Greep

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip call dropping

2003-07-02 Thread Michael Kane
Are the 2 SIP UA's configured for the same codec?


Michael Kane
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
www.to-talk.com
508-295-2826
- Original Message - 
From: Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip call dropping


 I'm having an issue with a connection between two sip phones, specfically
sjphone, The two phones connect just fine, but after about 5 sec the call is
dropped. On a side note a call does'nt got dropped between sip/sjphone and
the outside line with a wx100p card. The communcation is on a full 100mbit
network. I have a text file of the debug output of the call.

 Kevin,




 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATA-186 de-register

2003-07-02 Thread Daryl Jones
Yes, but I have been able to mitigate it by setting the following
parameters.  I have the problem with ATA's that are behind firewalls
and not, but mostly with the ones that are behind firewalls.

CfgInterval:1800
SIPRegInterval:100



On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Kim C. Callis wrote:

 Is it just me or do others have a problem with the ATA-186
 de-registering? Every couple of hours, if I don't make use of the ATA
 connected line, I find that I have to unplug and let the ATA reboot.
 After that it is good to go for awhile, but eventually I have to repeat
 the process. My ATA sits behind a NATd firewall, any ideas what might
 cause the de-registration?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Archer
Hi All...

I have a maddening problem...

I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to 
allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so I 
don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.

If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up, Asterisk 
answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the 
prompts.

My hardware is 2 X100P cards.

Any ideas?

Thanks...

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
 Hi All...
 
 I have a maddening problem...
 
 I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to 
 allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so I 
 don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
 
 If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up, Asterisk 
 answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the 
 prompts.
 
 My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
 
 Any ideas?

Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip call dropping

2003-07-02 Thread Kevin
Sjphone is set for Remote preferences for Codec Preference Selection
Do you I want it Local preferences?

Kevin,

-Original Message-
From: Michael Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip call dropping


Are the 2 SIP UA's configured for the same codec?


Michael Kane
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
www.to-talk.com
508-295-2826
- Original Message - 
From: Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip call dropping


 I'm having an issue with a connection between two sip phones, 
 specfically
sjphone, The two phones connect just fine, but after about 5 sec the call is dropped. 
On a side note a call does'nt got dropped between sip/sjphone and the outside line 
with a wx100p card. The communcation is on a full 100mbit network. I have a text file 
of the debug output of the call.

 Kevin,




 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 01:34 pm, Jim Archer wrote:
 Hi All...

 I have a maddening problem...

 I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do
 this to allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive
 ring pattern, so I don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.

 If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
 Asterisk answers the line, and holds it off hook forever,
 constantly playing the prompts.

show application AbsoluteTimeout

-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] ATA-186 de-register

2003-07-02 Thread Humberto Atristain








Same trouble J



Regards



Humberto



-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim C. Callis
Sent: Jueves, 03 de Julio de 2003 10:34 a.m.
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ATA-186
de-register



Is
it just me or do others have a problem with the ATA-186 de-registering? Every
couple of hours, if I dont make use of the ATA connected line, I find
that I have to unplug and let the ATA reboot. After that it is good to go for
awhile, but eventually I have to repeat the process. My ATA sits behind a NATd
firewall, any ideas what might cause the de-registration?



Kim
C. Callis








RE: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Joe Antkowiak
How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Critchfield
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
 Hi All...
 
 I have a maddening problem...
 
 I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to 
 allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so
I 
 don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
 
 If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
Asterisk 
 answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the 
 prompts.
 
 My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
 
 Any ideas?

Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Gottlieb
On 2003-07-02 at 13:54, Steven Critchfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
 immediately and detect fax tones

Unfortunately, not all fax machines send the CNG tone, so using a
separate fax number with distinctive ring is far more reliable.

Can asterisk detect the various rings and route accordingly?

If not, he could get two TDM100B cards, plug the two outputs of his
distinctive ring detector into the two cards and route each one to a
different context.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
When the line is picked up, and a prompt is being played for the caller,
asterisk listens for the beep, pause, beep, noise that an originating
fax makes. When asterisk detects this it jumps to a fax extension in the
current context to complete the call. This fax extension can be a dial
string to redirect the call to the appropriate line.

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:12, Joe Antkowiak wrote:
 How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
 Critchfield
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:55 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup
 
 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
  Hi All...
  
  I have a maddening problem...
  
  I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to 
  allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so
 I 
  don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
  
  If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
 Asterisk 
  answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the 
  prompts.
  
  My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
  
  Any ideas?
 
 Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
 immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Sergio Serrano Revuelto
You must put and fax exten in your context:

For example:
[default]
...
exten = fax,1,Dial(Zap/2|30|d)

srsergio

-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Joe
Antkowiak
Enviado el: miércoles, 02 de julio de 2003 21:13
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before
pickup


How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Critchfield
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before
pickup

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
 Hi All...
 
 I have a maddening problem...
 
 I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this

 to
 allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern,
so
I 
 don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
 
 If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
Asterisk 
 answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing 
 the
 prompts.
 
 My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
 
 Any ideas?

Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Archer
Thanks, but this is not a great solution.  It still leaves the line off 
hook for the length of the timeout and limits real calls to the timeout as 
well.

--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:11 PM -0500 Tilghman Lesher 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wednesday 02 July 2003 01:34 pm, Jim Archer wrote:
Hi All...

I have a maddening problem...

I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do
this to allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive
ring pattern, so I don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
Asterisk answers the line, and holds it off hook forever,
constantly playing the prompts.
show application AbsoluteTimeout

-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Martin Pycko
You Answer on analog channels and then you need to have
a fax extension in the current context.

regards
Martin

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Joe Antkowiak wrote:

 How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
 Critchfield
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:55 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
  Hi All...
 
  I have a maddening problem...
 
  I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to
  allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so
 I
  don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
 
  If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
 Asterisk
  answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the
  prompts.
 
  My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
 
  Any ideas?

 Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
 immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
 --
 Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread The Traveller
Hi Jim,

You're probably not receiving disconnect-supervision on your analog
lines, or have Zaptel configured incorrectly to recognize it.  Check
the list-archives (available from www.asterisk.org).  You could try the
busydetect-statement in zapata.conf.  Also check Asterisk's main Makefile
for some options related to busydetect.  I strongly recommend the improved
busydetect-routines (BUSYDETECT_MARTIN), which are not the default yet.
Make sure that your voice-menu's always have a timeout, so it's impossible
for your system to get stuck in one in the first place, should a caller not
hang up or this fact not be detected by Asterisk.



   Grtz,

 Oliver

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 14:34:56 -0400, Jim Archer wrote:

 Hi All...
 
 I have a maddening problem...
 
 I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to 
 allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so I 
 don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
 
 If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up, Asterisk 
 answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the 
 prompts.
 
 My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks...
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Karl Putland
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:12, Joe Antkowiak wrote:
 How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?

create and exten for fax

exten = fax,1,Dial(${MYFAXDEVICE})

--Karl

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
 Critchfield
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:55 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup
 
 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
  Hi All...
  
  I have a maddening problem...
  
  I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to 
  allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so
 I 
  don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
  
  If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
 Asterisk 
  answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the 
  prompts.
  
  My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
  
  Any ideas?
 
 Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
 immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
-- 
Karl Putland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:42 pm, Jim Archer wrote:
 Thanks, but this is not a great solution.  It still leaves the line
 off hook for the length of the timeout and limits real calls to the
 timeout as well.

Not so.  Once the user presses any DTMF, the first thing you can
do is to set AbsoluteTimeout(0), which turns off the AbsoluteTimeout.
If you originally set it to 60, the line will remain off hook for a
maximum of 60 seconds before it will hang up.

-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite

2003-07-02 Thread Moshe Yudkowsky
At 22:10 2003-07-01 -0400, you wrote:
To find out what version yuor using, dial *999 and a debug/trace window will
appear.  In the SIP messages it will indicate the type of UA your using and
the version.  example below:   try another call attempt with this window
open and capture the call flow and send it to me.  See below in bold or
(User-Agent: X-PRO build 1035).
Mike


Mike,

Thanks for writing. After you wrote, I had a brainwave and remembered that 
the UA is in the debug logs on asterisk...

Be that as it may, I'm using X-Lite, and the latest version from their web 
site is build 1016. That's as of today (Wednesday, 07-02), and that's the 
version that I'm using on my system.

I will send you the debug logs off-list, but here's the question: is it 
likely that X-Pro works but X-Lite still has trouble with its SDP?

Regards,
 Moshe



- Original Message -
From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite
 At 20:08 2003-07-01 -0400, Michael Kane wrote:
 What version of X-Lite are you using.  The latest is build v1035.  There
 where problems in earlier releases with SDP values, that could be the
reason
 you not seeing invites or media.  I had issues only with the media not
 setting as X-lite tried to negotiate media with another endpoint and teh
SDP
 was hosed.
 
 Mike


 Mike,

 I downloaded the version I'm using late last week or early this week. It
 ought to be the latest. There's no way to tell from looking at the app
 (that I can find) what build it is.

 Let's see... created June 18th. That's pretty recent. I think it may be
 bug-report time.

 Any softphones you recommend for PC or for Linux? I'm actually rather
 disappointed with everything I've tested, with the exception of SJPhone
 (but I've only fiddled with it very briefly).




 Michael Kane
 To-Talk Communications LLC.
 37 Sandusky Dr.
 Wareham, Ma. 02571
 www.to-talk.com
 508-295-2826
 - Original Message -
 From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:24 PM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on Khpone
 and SJPhone and X-Lite
 
 
   Today's frustrated programmer award goes to Linphone, which has the
   following debug output:
  
(linphone:28655): LinphoneCore-WARNING **: this fucking remote sip
phone
 did not answered properly to my sdp offer!
  
   I get this message when I connect to linphone using a softphone, or
when
   I try to use linphone to connect to asterisk and listen to an
   announcement. I suspect that this is a linphone problem... other
clients
   don't report problems.
  
   In other news, according to my trace of Ethernet packets, the PC
   softphone X-Lite sends no RTP packets -- neither UDP nor TCP -- to my
   Linux softphone, nor does it play out the UDP packets that it
receives.
   This is not an asterisk problem because the PC's SJphone does work --
   sortof.
  
   The PC's SJPhone does send/receive packets directly to asterisk. But
   there seems to be a problem with someone's negotiation protocol --
   Kphone seems to expect GSM and SJPhone is apparently sending G.711.
You
   can imagine how that sounds. More later if I get it straightened out.
  
   --
 Moshe Yudkowsky * http://www.Disaggregate.com
  
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 --
   Moshe Yudkowsky
   Disaggregate
   2952 W Fargo
   Chicago, IL 60645 USA

   www.Disaggregate.com
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   +1 773 764 8727

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
 Moshe Yudkowsky
 Disaggregate
 2952 W Fargo
 Chicago, IL 60645 USA
 www.Disaggregate.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +1 773 764 8727
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Archer
Ah!  I see, thanks!

And thanks to everyone else.  I have plenty to ways to proceed now.  I'm 
going to try the cheap solutions first.

Jim

--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 3:34 PM -0500 Tilghman Lesher 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:42 pm, Jim Archer wrote:
Thanks, but this is not a great solution.  It still leaves the line
off hook for the length of the timeout and limits real calls to the
timeout as well.
Not so.  Once the user presses any DTMF, the first thing you can
do is to set AbsoluteTimeout(0), which turns off the AbsoluteTimeout.
If you originally set it to 60, the line will remain off hook for a
maximum of 60 seconds before it will hang up.
-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

2003-07-02 Thread Michael Kane
Hey Jim , you are correct in respect to the Service provider must pay for
the bandwidth as I/we will be hair pinning calls back into the Internet.  As
far as voice quality is concerned (which is my biggest concern) the
solution(box) FWD uses will not be the solution I will implement.  I am
seriously looking/talking with another vendor.  But, back to the point,
unless a SP has a subscriber base that is technically savy we/I really have
no other choice.  Again I have a STUN server implemented, but, SNOM and
Grandstream are the only hardphone vendors that ship their products with a
stun client(that I know of).  Beleive me, I wish this wasn't something I had
to think about.

regards Mike



Michael Kane
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
www.to-talk.com
508-295-2826
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Flagg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT


 - Original Message - 
 From: Michael Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A solution for SIP and NAT

 snip

  That why I have looked into(implemented) such technologies
  like STUN and probably will be forced to purchase a SIP aware firewall
that
  will spoof and re-arrange SIP messages destined for my proxy server.

 snip

 Correct me if I am wrong but I see a couple big disadvantages to this
 solution.

 1.  Voice latency can be significantly increased since all the RTP traffic
has
 to go through the VOIP providers NAT-proxy.  Even if you are calling your
 next door neighbor, the traffic has to go all the way to the NAT-proxy and
back.
 Just ask one of the FWD NAT-proxy users in Europe what it does for sound
 quality.

 2.  The VOIP provider has to pay for all the bandwidth of the RTP steams
rather
 than just the small amount of traffic for call setup.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite

2003-07-02 Thread Michael Kane
Erik over at XTEN is pretty good at getting the latest build out for both
lite and prolet me email my partner they(xten just emailed us the latest
and greatest for both.  I also thought as of a week or so ago 1035 was the
last build they would publish until their new product offering.  (which is
really cool)

I'll email you lite if it's more recent than 1016..


Michael Kane (President/CEO)
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
www.to-talk.com
508-295-2826
- Original Message - 
From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite


 At 22:10 2003-07-01 -0400, you wrote:
 To find out what version yuor using, dial *999 and a debug/trace window
will
 appear.  In the SIP messages it will indicate the type of UA your using
and
 the version.  example below:   try another call attempt with this window
 open and capture the call flow and send it to me.  See below in bold or
 (User-Agent: X-PRO build 1035).
 
 Mike


 Mike,

 Thanks for writing. After you wrote, I had a brainwave and remembered that
 the UA is in the debug logs on asterisk...

 Be that as it may, I'm using X-Lite, and the latest version from their web
 site is build 1016. That's as of today (Wednesday, 07-02), and that's the
 version that I'm using on my system.

 I will send you the debug logs off-list, but here's the question: is it
 likely that X-Pro works but X-Lite still has trouble with its SDP?

 Regards,
   Moshe




 - Original Message -
 From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:32 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
 Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite
 
 
   At 20:08 2003-07-01 -0400, Michael Kane wrote:
   What version of X-Lite are you using.  The latest is build v1035.
There
   where problems in earlier releases with SDP values, that could be the
 reason
   you not seeing invites or media.  I had issues only with the media
not
   setting as X-lite tried to negotiate media with another endpoint and
teh
 SDP
   was hosed.
   
   Mike
  
  
   Mike,
  
   I downloaded the version I'm using late last week or early this week.
It
   ought to be the latest. There's no way to tell from looking at the app
   (that I can find) what build it is.
  
   Let's see... created June 18th. That's pretty recent. I think it may
be
   bug-report time.
  
   Any softphones you recommend for PC or for Linux? I'm actually rather
   disappointed with everything I've tested, with the exception of
SJPhone
   (but I've only fiddled with it very briefly).
  
  
  
  
   Michael Kane
   To-Talk Communications LLC.
   37 Sandusky Dr.
   Wareham, Ma. 02571
   www.to-talk.com
   508-295-2826
   - Original Message -
   From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:24 PM
   Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
Khpone
   and SJPhone and X-Lite
   
   
 Today's frustrated programmer award goes to Linphone, which has
the
 following debug output:

  (linphone:28655): LinphoneCore-WARNING **: this fucking remote
sip
 phone
   did not answered properly to my sdp offer!

 I get this message when I connect to linphone using a softphone,
or
 when
 I try to use linphone to connect to asterisk and listen to an
 announcement. I suspect that this is a linphone problem... other
 clients
 don't report problems.

 In other news, according to my trace of Ethernet packets, the PC
 softphone X-Lite sends no RTP packets -- neither UDP nor TCP -- to
my
 Linux softphone, nor does it play out the UDP packets that it
 receives.
 This is not an asterisk problem because the PC's SJphone does
work --
 sortof.

 The PC's SJPhone does send/receive packets directly to asterisk.
But
 there seems to be a problem with someone's negotiation protocol --
 Kphone seems to expect GSM and SJPhone is apparently sending
G.711.
 You
 can imagine how that sounds. More later if I get it straightened
out.

 --
   Moshe Yudkowsky * http://www.Disaggregate.com


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
   --
 Moshe Yudkowsky
 Disaggregate
 2952 W Fargo
 Chicago, IL 60645 USA
  
 www.Disaggregate.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +1 773 764 8727
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite

2003-07-02 Thread Michael Kane
your right.1016 is the latest and greatest...

Michael Kane (President/CEO)
To-Talk Communications LLC.
37 Sandusky Dr.
Wareham, Ma. 02571
www.to-talk.com
508-295-2826
- Original Message - 
From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite


 At 22:10 2003-07-01 -0400, you wrote:
 To find out what version yuor using, dial *999 and a debug/trace window
will
 appear.  In the SIP messages it will indicate the type of UA your using
and
 the version.  example below:   try another call attempt with this window
 open and capture the call flow and send it to me.  See below in bold or
 (User-Agent: X-PRO build 1035).
 
 Mike


 Mike,

 Thanks for writing. After you wrote, I had a brainwave and remembered that
 the UA is in the debug logs on asterisk...

 Be that as it may, I'm using X-Lite, and the latest version from their web
 site is build 1016. That's as of today (Wednesday, 07-02), and that's the
 version that I'm using on my system.

 I will send you the debug logs off-list, but here's the question: is it
 likely that X-Pro works but X-Lite still has trouble with its SDP?

 Regards,
   Moshe




 - Original Message -
 From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:32 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
 Khpone and SJPhone and X-Lite
 
 
   At 20:08 2003-07-01 -0400, Michael Kane wrote:
   What version of X-Lite are you using.  The latest is build v1035.
There
   where problems in earlier releases with SDP values, that could be the
 reason
   you not seeing invites or media.  I had issues only with the media
not
   setting as X-lite tried to negotiate media with another endpoint and
teh
 SDP
   was hosed.
   
   Mike
  
  
   Mike,
  
   I downloaded the version I'm using late last week or early this week.
It
   ought to be the latest. There's no way to tell from looking at the app
   (that I can find) what build it is.
  
   Let's see... created June 18th. That's pretty recent. I think it may
be
   bug-report time.
  
   Any softphones you recommend for PC or for Linux? I'm actually rather
   disappointed with everything I've tested, with the exception of
SJPhone
   (but I've only fiddled with it very briefly).
  
  
  
  
   Michael Kane
   To-Talk Communications LLC.
   37 Sandusky Dr.
   Wareham, Ma. 02571
   www.to-talk.com
   508-295-2826
   - Original Message -
   From: Moshe Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:24 PM
   Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Today's Message from linphone; update on
Khpone
   and SJPhone and X-Lite
   
   
 Today's frustrated programmer award goes to Linphone, which has
the
 following debug output:

  (linphone:28655): LinphoneCore-WARNING **: this fucking remote
sip
 phone
   did not answered properly to my sdp offer!

 I get this message when I connect to linphone using a softphone,
or
 when
 I try to use linphone to connect to asterisk and listen to an
 announcement. I suspect that this is a linphone problem... other
 clients
 don't report problems.

 In other news, according to my trace of Ethernet packets, the PC
 softphone X-Lite sends no RTP packets -- neither UDP nor TCP -- to
my
 Linux softphone, nor does it play out the UDP packets that it
 receives.
 This is not an asterisk problem because the PC's SJphone does
work --
 sortof.

 The PC's SJPhone does send/receive packets directly to asterisk.
But
 there seems to be a problem with someone's negotiation protocol --
 Kphone seems to expect GSM and SJPhone is apparently sending
G.711.
 You
 can imagine how that sounds. More later if I get it straightened
out.

 --
   Moshe Yudkowsky * http://www.Disaggregate.com


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
   --
 Moshe Yudkowsky
 Disaggregate
 2952 W Fargo
 Chicago, IL 60645 USA
  
 www.Disaggregate.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +1 773 764 8727
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 -- 
   Moshe Yudkowsky
   Disaggregate
   2952 W Fargo
   Chicago, IL 60645 USA

   www.Disaggregate.com
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   +1 773 764 8727

 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Archer
Ok, how do I detect the pressing of any touch tone so I can set the timeout 
back to 0?

--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:51 PM -0500 Tilghman Lesher 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:12 pm, Joe Antkowiak wrote:
How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?
Zaptel devices will detect fax tones automatically.  If it finds them,
Asterisk will attempt to go to extension fax, priority 1, if it
exists.
-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Mark Spencer
Actually there is a WaitForRing app that would probably solve this more
easily.

Mark

On 2 Jul 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:

 On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
  Hi All...
 
  I have a maddening problem...
 
  I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this to
  allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring pattern, so I
  don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.
 
  If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up, Asterisk
  answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly playing the
  prompts.
 
  My hardware is 2 X100P cards.
 
  Any ideas?

 Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
 immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
 --
 Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Steven Critchfield
basically make priority 1 of any extension other than timeout be a set
timeout 0. 

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 16:32, Jim Archer wrote:
 Ok, how do I detect the pressing of any touch tone so I can set the timeout 
 back to 0?
 
 --On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:51 PM -0500 Tilghman Lesher 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:12 pm, Joe Antkowiak wrote:
  How do you tell asterisk to detect for fax tones?
 
  Zaptel devices will detect fax tones automatically.  If it finds them,
  Asterisk will attempt to go to extension fax, priority 1, if it
  exists.
 
  -Tilghman
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 04:32 pm, Jim Archer wrote:
 Ok, how do I detect the pressing of any touch tone so I can set the
 timeout back to 0?

Pressing DTMF while waiting for a timeout (or while playing a file
with Background) will redirect you to a new extension.

For example, if you call us (700-382-4758), you'll hear a looping
greeting.  If you type in my extension (103), it'll jump to extension
103, priority 1, where I run AbsoluteTimeout(0), then it runs Dial
on my extension.

-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Archer
Mark, I took a look at this app.  How would I do this?  Put wait for ring 
at the top of the loop?  How do I detect and act on the return value?

--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:38 PM -0500 Mark Spencer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Actually there is a WaitForRing app that would probably solve this more
easily.
Mark

On 2 Jul 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 13:34, Jim Archer wrote:
 Hi All...

 I have a maddening problem...

 I have Asterisk configured to pick up a line after 4 rings.  I do this
 to allow my fax machine to pick up a particular distinctive ring
 pattern, so I don't have to pay for a dedicated fax line.

 If someone calls the line, lets it ring 3 times and then hangs up,
 Asterisk answers the line, and holds it off hook forever, constantly
 playing the prompts.

 My hardware is 2 X100P cards.

 Any ideas?
Get a TDM10B, cancel your distinctive ring, and let asterisk answer
immediately and detect fax tones and forward it to your fax machine.
--
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] BIG problem with multiple rings before pickup

2003-07-02 Thread Jim Archer
Ok, thanks.  I was hoping I would not have to set timeout back to 0 for 
each extension...

--On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:54 PM -0500 Tilghman Lesher 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wednesday 02 July 2003 04:32 pm, Jim Archer wrote:
Ok, how do I detect the pressing of any touch tone so I can set the
timeout back to 0?
Pressing DTMF while waiting for a timeout (or while playing a file
with Background) will redirect you to a new extension.
For example, if you call us (700-382-4758), you'll hear a looping
greeting.  If you type in my extension (103), it'll jump to extension
103, priority 1, where I run AbsoluteTimeout(0), then it runs Dial
on my extension.
-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] client reinvitation problem

2003-07-02 Thread vk
Hello All!

There is description of my problem with Asteriks below.
Asteriks CLI says: 
File chan_sip.c, Line 415 (retrans_pkt): Maximum retries exceeded on call

Sip debug on the server gives the next:

Retransmitting #5 (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.26:5060
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;tag=106403508
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;tag=as0771c6f9
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 209

8523 is Cisco ATA-186 

The sip.conf content:
 - - - - - 
[cisco8523]
type=friend
username=8523
secret=test
nat=no
host=dynamic
canreinvite=no
qualify=300
defaultip=192.168.0.26 
 - - - - - 

Why I place a call to Asteriks. I hear some invitation but connection brokes
when retransmit exceed.

Could anyone give some advice or solution.
Thanks in advance

--
Best regards
Vlad

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] ANNOUNCE: CLASS-like features for Asterisk

2003-07-02 Thread The Traveller
Yo all,

As there has been some intrest, here's my updated version:
I post it to -dev as well as -users, as it may be of intrest to
both.


Inspired by the example in the tips  tricks-section of
http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/;, I built a more elaborate
set of features.  Currently, my implementation supports call-
forward unconditional, on no answer and on busy.  It furthermore
provides each extension with a set of user-definable speed-dials.
It validates if the number entered is actually valid for the current context
and additionally saves this context into the DB and always uses it to
originate the divert from, as you can't expect the forward destination-
number to be available from all caller's contexts.  Only the
speed-dials use the extension's current context, but do save the
context a speed-dial was entered from into the DB anyways.

Some things you need to know:

- No check for forwarding-loops yet.  I haven't tried what happens
when you create one, either.  :-)

- When a call gets forwarded to another local extension and goes to
voicemail from there, voicemail will be left for the extension that
originally forwarded the call, instead of the extension the call was
forwarded to.  This might be seen as a feature.

- The contexts to set the features are to be included into the
context of each extension you want to allow to use them and you
should replace your macro-stdexten with my version (which accepts
some more args than the original version, to allow for passing most
arguments to the Dial-application.  This means you have to change
either your extension-entries or the macro, if you're already using
macro-stdexten.

- If you where using my first version, you should remove all related
entries from your ast-DB, as I modified the format somewhat.

- As you can see, it currently uses Festival for it's prompts,
which should obviously be installed and working with Asterisk.
Without it, everything will probably still work, but no prompts,
except the standard invalid-recording, which is used when entering
invalid numbers, will be played.

- I'll probably add more features when I have time, and post an
update.  Also, this stdexten-macro, like the original one,
assumes everyone has voicemail.  Making a second copy without
voicemail or adding an extra argument to enable / disable VM-
processing should be trivial.


Usage:

921 + number   - Set unconditional forwarding.
921  - Cancel unconditional forwarding.
9921 - Check unconditional forwarding.

961 + number   - Set forwarding on no answer.
961  - Cancel forwarding on no answer.
9961 - Check forwarding on no answer.

967 + number   - Set forwarding on busy.
967  - Cancel forwarding on busy.
9967 - Check forwarding on busy.

970 - 999 + number - Set a personal speed-dial.
970 - 999 + 0  - Clear a personal speed-dial.
970 - 999- Call a personal speed-dial, if set.
9970 -   - Check a personal speed-dial.


Note that I choose 9 instead of * because a lot of IP-phones
don't allow the user to dial a number containing the * or #.
Nothing stops you from changing it as needed.

Also note that this is almost my first go at it, and I haven't tested it
very heavily.  Comments, suggestions and additions are welcome.  Hope
it's useful to some of you.


Grtz,

  Oliver


;
; Macros
;
[macro-stdexten];
;
; Standard extension macro:
;   ${ARG1} - Extension  (we could have used ${MACRO_EXTEN} here as well
;   ${ARG2} - Device(s) to ring
;   ${ARG3} - Timeout
;   ${ARG4} - Other options to app_dial
;
exten = s,1,DBget(fwdexten=FEAT/${ARG1}/CFWD/CFU)
exten = s,102,Goto(s|4)
exten = s,2,DBget(fwdcontext=FEAT/${ARG1}/CFWD/CFUC)
exten = s,3,Goto(${fwdcontext}|${fwdexten}|1)
exten = s,4,Dial(${ARG2},${ARG3},${ARG4})
exten = s,105,Goto(s|205)
exten = s,5,DBget(fwdexten=FEAT/${ARG1}/CFWD/CFNA)
exten = s,106,Goto(s|8)
exten = s,6,DBget(fwdcontext=FEAT/${ARG1}/CFWD/CFNAC)
exten = s,7,Goto(${fwdcontext}|${fwdexten}|1)
exten = s,8,Answer
exten = s,9,Voicemail2(su${ARG1})
exten = s,10,Hangup
exten = s,205,DBget(fwdexten=FEAT/${ARG1}/CFWD/CFB)
exten = s,306,Goto(s|208)
exten = s,206,DBget(fwdcontext=FEAT/${ARG1}/CFWD/CFBC)
exten = s,207,Goto(${fwdcontext}|${fwdexten}|1)
exten = s,208,Answer
exten = s,209,Voicemail2(sb${ARG1})
exten = s,210,Hangup

;
; Special features, Call Forwarding, unconditional.
;
[feature-cfu]
exten = _921X.,1,Answer
exten = _921X.,2,ChanIsAvail(Local/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _921X.,103,Playback(invalid)
exten = _921X.,104,Hangup
exten = _921X.,3,DBput(FEAT/${CALLERIDNUM}/CFWD/CFU=${EXTEN:3})
exten = _921X.,4,DBput(FEAT/${CALLERIDNUM}/CFWD/CFUC=${CONTEXT})
exten = _921X.,5,Festival(Call-Forward Unconditional: Has been set too: ${EXTEN:3}.)
exten = _921X.,6,Hangup
exten = 921,1,Answer
exten = 921,2,DBdel(FEAT/${CALLERIDNUM}/CFWD/CFU)
exten = 921,3,DBdel(FEAT/${CALLERIDNUM}/CFWD/CFUC)
exten = 

[Asterisk-Users] Sorry 'bout that

2003-07-02 Thread Moshe Yudkowsky
Sorry 'bout that vacation message. Procmail usually is smart enough to 
avoid sending replies to mailing lists. I put in a rule to prevent this 
from happening again.

--
 Moshe Yudkowsky * http://www.Disaggregate.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialout Lines ???

2003-07-02 Thread Ing. Angel Gomez Garcia
   Yes you can. Configure it either as a SIP gateway or an h.323 
gatekeeper.

Bradley Greep wrote:

I've been reading the Linejack strikes again messages, and have another Newbie question

is it possible to use a Voip Product as a Dialout line for * ?
I have a Vegastream 100 Voip to PRI. box. With * can I use that as a Dialout / dialin 
box?
The Vega100 does either sip or h.323.
Thanks.
Bradley Greep
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users