[Asterisk-Users] SIP phones, Asterisk and bandwidth

2004-11-04 Thread Ronald Wiplinger

I have not studied SIP yet. 


I have an Asterisk server, and SIP phones somewhere on the globe, not locally 
connected to the Asterisk server.

What is the bandwidth I need to the Asterisk server?
I assume that only the registration is the bandwidth to the Asterisk server, 
while the phone call will be made from phone to phone directly.

How much bandwidth do I need to server as a PBX for 100 phones, 1000 
phones,   How many phones are usually on at the same time from 100% 
registered phones?

I understand that if I operate a gateway, than all the bandwith of the voice 
stream will also go through this gateway, ...

bye

Ronald
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] supposable timing problem with TE100P

2004-11-04 Thread Kurt Bauer
Hi list,
every now and then I get the following message in my * logs:
chan_zap.c:7379 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary 
D-channel of span 1

As this is only a notice and voice worked quite well, despite the messages, 
I didn't bother.
_But_, I wanted to try spandsp/fax (latest version) lately and whenever I 
send a fax to * the pages get chopped, which according to Steve Underwood 
points at a timing problem, either in * or Hardware.

I don't know if the messages about FCS errors have smth. to do with the fax 
problems, but hope that someone out there has a clue ;-))

BTW, I see a lot of the following messages too:
!! Unknown IE 49 (cs5, Unknown Information Element)
!! Unknown IE 50 (cs5, Unknown Information Element)
If any further information is needed to narrow the problem down please let 
me know.

Thanks a lot in advance,
best regards,
Kurt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] h323 dundi problems with 11/04/04 CVS

2004-11-04 Thread administrator tootai
Hi list,
I face 2 problems with a today (11/04/04) CVS version:
H323:

Nufone h323: calling  Dial(H323/extension) give  in logs
Host: extension Username:
placing outgoing call to :1721 - this is my GK port
h323_make_call failed(H323/extension)
[...]
dialstatus=chanunavail
Calling from a H323 EP to * I have connection but no audio in both sides.
Dundi:
-
if I load dundi module I receive an failed load module - undefined
symbol: uncompress I had to remove the -lz at the end of makefile
pbx_dundi.so because I had an error at compilation:
gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o pbx_dundi.so pbx_dundi.o dundi_parser.o -lz
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
If anyone has an idea. I have those errors since the upgrade from
11/02/04 Before, an 09/25/04 CVS everything went fine.
--
Daniel
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Video conferencing Meet Me Bounty bumped

2004-11-04 Thread dean collins








Bounty bumped to $US1,000 11/04/04

I've been able to secure some pledges from 2 people outside
of the asterisk community that should this feature be made available that they
will contribute $300 and $200 respectively.

This bounty now stands at $US1,000.

So far I haven't received any interest from any developers
to work on this, please contact me dean at collins.net.pr should you be
interested.



Cheers,

Dean






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] CVS-HEAD-11/03/04-14:09:34 ALERT_INFO Doesn't Get Passed

2004-11-04 Thread Matthew Marlowe
I saw a previous post about this but I can't find it,
CVS-HEAD-11/03/04-14:09:34 does not pass ALERT_INFO to the phones.  It
used to work but has now stopped.  I'm not a coder so I can't look
through the code but someone mentioned ALERT_INFO does not exist in
app_dial if I remember correctly.

Anyone know anything about this?

-- 
MBM
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Perl AGIs TCP Sockets

2004-11-04 Thread Victor Cartes
Hello everybody
   Do you remember I sent a case to the list about a digit 1 phantom I 
received when I call the method get_data or stream_file? Fine. I realized 
that It does not happend when I omit a subrutine I my code where I open a 
TCP client socket by IO::Socket.

   I think It is because Asterisk send data to AGI by STDIN, like my 
socket; and somehow the 1 I get come from the TCP Socket. Am I right? If 
so... why does It happend after I properly close my socket?

   Please give me a hand!
   Thanks in advace.
   Víctor 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Eicon Diva Server 4BRI

2004-11-04 Thread Damon Estep
 Hi Damon,
 
 I have the Eicon Diva Server BRI card working fine on my box. 
 What is important (if you want to use kernel 2.6) is that you 
 need to use at least kernel 2.6.9 because a lot of CAPI/Eicon 
 fixes where added.
 Divactrl is needed to load the firmware on the card:
 http://isdn4linux.org/~armin/divas/divactrl_2.1.tar.gz
 The firmware for the card can be found here:
 ftp://ftp.isdn4linux.org/pub/isdn4linux/utils/eicon/firmware/
 
 Regards,
 Patrick
 
Is there a significant advantage (or requirement) to using kernel 2.6
with Eicon / chan_capi / * ? All of my experimentation and use up to now
has been redhat 9. What 2.6 distro are you using? fedora core 2?

Have there been things that DO NOT work with kernel 2.6 in your
experience?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] supposable timing problem with TE100P

2004-11-04 Thread Peter Svensson
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Kurt Bauer wrote:

 Hi list,
 
 every now and then I get the following message in my * logs:
 chan_zap.c:7379 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary 
 D-channel of span 1
 
 As this is only a notice and voice worked quite well, despite the messages, 
 I didn't bother.
 _But_, I wanted to try spandsp/fax (latest version) lately and whenever I 
 send a fax to * the pages get chopped, which according to Steve Underwood 
 points at a timing problem, either in * or Hardware.

Is your timing source set correctly? If you are connecting to the pstn the 
pstn connection should be the primary timing source.

What does the missed interrupts counter in cat cat /proc/zaptel/1 say?

Peter

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] CVS Missing MeetMe App?

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 08:56 -0500, david winter wrote:
 All,
 
 I was going to mess around with meetme on my cvs install of asterisk, but the 
 app_meetme does not seem to be there. I did a normal make 
 clean;make install. ran asterisk, did a 'show applications' and its not there. i 
 have extensions.conf and meetme.conf setup correctly, when i try 
 to do MeetMe(1000|p) it says there is no MeetMe application registered? Is MeetMe no 
 'registered' already?

Please learn to start a NEW thread. Don't hit reply and delete the
previous content. Your mail reader actually tattles on you by telling us
you responded tp Paul Rodan's message with subject RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Unable to write frame to channel: Success - MeetMeproblem.

You also didn't mention what devices you have connected to your asterisk
machine. As app_meetme.c was in the CVS tree 2 days ago and I haven't
seen anything cross the -cvs mailing list with regards to it being
removed, I am left with the impression that you don't have any Zap
devices nor the code checked out and compiled. App Meetme requires
zaptel drivers as it uses specialized code from the zaptel drivers to
actually mix the channels together and also as a timer to make sure
samples are going out at regular intervals to keep all portions of the
conference chop free. Please refer to the wiki or the mailing list via
google for such things as the zap rtc interface or the zap dummy
interface to provide you with the proper timers for meetme.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Perl AGIs TCP Sockets

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 11:15 -0400, Victor Cartes wrote:
 Hello everybody
 
 Do you remember I sent a case to the list about a digit 1 phantom I 
 received when I call the method get_data or stream_file? Fine. I realized 
 that It does not happend when I omit a subrutine I my code where I open a 
 TCP client socket by IO::Socket.
 
 I think It is because Asterisk send data to AGI by STDIN, like my 
 socket; and somehow the 1 I get come from the TCP Socket. Am I right? If 
 so... why does It happend after I properly close my socket?

Well you seem to have narrowed your problem down to something between
you and perl, not asterisk. Without the code, it would be difficult to
determine the problem. It may well be a problem with selected input, if
you selected the socket and then closed it, you would need to select
stdin again. Without code samples, it is just a guessing game.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79XX - Using built-in 3way conference

2004-11-04 Thread Matthew Boehm
We recently switched to 729. I wouldn't expect that to cause built-in
conferencing to stop working.

Matthew
- Original Message - 
From: Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79XX - Using built-in 3way conference


 Matthew Boehm wrote:

  This works fine if caller 1 and 2 are both other phones in the office or
  caller 1 is a phone in office and 2 is PSTN. Just doesn't work when both
  PSTN. Worked before..

 What codecs are involved? If you are using low-bandwidth codecs for PSTN
 connections, the Cisco phones will refuse to conference two
 low-bandwidth calls together. They may work with a ulaw and a
 low-bandwidth call, but I haven't tested that.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Multiline (4 or 8) sip phone

2004-11-04 Thread Jerry Geis
All,
What is a good multiline sip phone for an operator? Model and and 
manufacturer.

I presume the multiline phone looks like 4 or 8 independent SIP
phones and asterisk would handle that by a call queue.
Then the operator just does her normal routine answering calls etc...
Thanks for the suggestion.
Jerry
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] X100P Analog PBX - not RING and not answer

2004-11-04 Thread alexandre::aldeia digital
Hi,
I connect a X100p in a Analog PBX extension.
If I want to call a analog extension (e.g.: using a softphone), the 
asterisk pick up the extension and dial perfectly.
If I call the extension where where the X100Pp is connected (inside the 
company), the asterisk doesn't answer the call.

I do: modprobe wcfxo debug=1 opermode=1
This message repeats lot of times:
Setting hook state to 0 (0a)
But in syslog, I don't see the RING! and NO RING! messages.
This is the outputs of the ztmonitor and audacity:
http://www.ad2.com.br/asterisk/teste.wav.bz2
http://www.ad2.com.br/asterisk/teste.png.bz2
And the state of Zap channels is always offhook:
*CLI zap show channel 1
Channel: 1
(...)
InAlarm: 0
Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart
(...)
Actual Hookstate: Offhook
If I disconnect the cable of the board, the hookstate changes to onhook.
I made a lot of tests with tx and rx gain w/o success.
Thanks for any help.
Alexandre Arruda Paes

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] supposable timing problem with TE100P

2004-11-04 Thread Kurt Bauer

--On Thursday, November 04, 2004 03:19:56 PM +0100 Peter Svensson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Kurt Bauer wrote:
Hi list,
every now and then I get the following message in my * logs:
chan_zap.c:7379 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary
D-channel of span 1
As this is only a notice and voice worked quite well, despite the
messages,  I didn't bother.
_But_, I wanted to try spandsp/fax (latest version) lately and whenever
I  send a fax to * the pages get chopped, which according to Steve
Underwood  points at a timing problem, either in * or Hardware.
Is your timing source set correctly? If you are connecting to the pstn
the  pstn connection should be the primary timing source.
connection is to a Ericsson MD110 wich is set as network, * is set as CPE.
What does the missed interrupts counter in cat cat /proc/zaptel/1 say?
cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 HDB3/CCS
  1 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use)
  2 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use)
  3 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use)
  4 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use)
  5 WCT1/0/5 Clear (In use)
  6 WCT1/0/6 Clear (In use)
  7 WCT1/0/7 Clear (In use)
  8 WCT1/0/8 Clear (In use)
  9 WCT1/0/9 Clear (In use)
 10 WCT1/0/10 Clear (In use)
 11 WCT1/0/11 Clear (In use)
 12 WCT1/0/12 Clear (In use)
 13 WCT1/0/13 Clear (In use)
 14 WCT1/0/14 Clear (In use)
 15 WCT1/0/15 Clear (In use)
 16 WCT1/0/16 HDLCFCS (In use)
 17 WCT1/0/17 Clear (In use)
 18 WCT1/0/18 Clear (In use)
 19 WCT1/0/19 Clear (In use)
 20 WCT1/0/20 Clear (In use)
 21 WCT1/0/21 Clear (In use)
 22 WCT1/0/22 Clear (In use)
 23 WCT1/0/23 Clear (In use)
 24 WCT1/0/24 Clear (In use)
 25 WCT1/0/25 Clear (In use)
 26 WCT1/0/26 Clear (In use)
 27 WCT1/0/27 Clear (In use)
 28 WCT1/0/28 Clear (In use)
 29 WCT1/0/29 Clear (In use)
 30 WCT1/0/30 Clear (In use)
 31 WCT1/0/31 Clear (In use)
br,
Kurt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] CISCO IP Conference Station

2004-11-04 Thread Pedro Mansilla








Hi,



 Somebody
have any idea how I can config a CISCO IP CONFERENCE
STATION Model 7935 that work with * .



Thanks.








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2, Zaptel 1.0.2, Linux 2.6.9 on a PCEngines WRAP\Soekris net4801 in Compact Flash

2004-11-04 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Brian Wilkins wrote:
Sounds cool, but I heard a rumor that CF Cards don't like too many rewrites or 
they start losing data.

Brian,
It boots read-only and uses ramdisks for RW stuff.
--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] real-time-clock asterisk/meetme/ztdummy in 2.6.9 UML

2004-11-04 Thread nils toedtmann
Hi *,

  [this goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i try to setup an VoIP conferencing server within a UML using asterisk 
and it's 'MeetMe conference bridge'. I have several UMLs running other 
services, but my asterisk know-how is poor (as you will see ;-).


Question #1: did anybody successfully implement an asterisk 
 MeetMe-conference inside a 2.6-UML?


It needs a special zaptel timer. As there is no special hardware,
i have to use a ztdummy/2.6 or zaprtc:

  http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20timer


Question #2: is there any chance that either ztdummy or zaprtc
 will work inside 2.6-UML?


I tried ztdummy. After frickeling the Makefile, it compiled against
the UML source tree, it loads within the UML on top of zaptel.ko

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# lsmod 
  Module  Size  Used by
  ztdummy 2628  0 
  zaptel227940  1 ztdummy
 
(no other modules loaded). Asterisk works (e.g. i can hear the conf-
onlyperson message when i enter the conference room). But the audio 
of the conference itself is extremly snatchy. That _may_ be a config 
problem, but a very similar configuration on a non-UML works, and un-
loading the ztdummy.ko on that system results in the same snatchy 
audio, so i suspect the ztdummy.ko or some device configuration is 
broken in my UML.

At the same time, i observe this

  http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2004/Oct/8108.html

problem within my UML, too:

  # tail -f /var/log/messages
  tail: cannot read realtime clock: Unknown error 516

and tail exits with code 1.


Question #3: is there a problem with the RTC in 2.6.9?


My host is 2.6.8.1 + skas3-2.6.7-v5 without module support:
  CONFIG_SMP=y (host is a P4 with HT)
  CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
  CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
  CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
  CONFIG_RTC=y
  CONFIG_PREEMPT=y

My guest is 2.6.9, with module support. Besides the zaptel  
modules no feature is compiles as a module but static.
  CONFIG_UML_REAL_TIME_CLOCK=y


Question #4: Shall i try different SMP/HT/RTC settings on
 host or guest?


Regards, /nils.



host and guest are FC2. I use the asterisk-1.0 from ATrpms
http://atrpms.net/dist/fc2/asterisk/ and seft-built
zaptel-1.0.2 tarball

user-mode-linux: 
  http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
  http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/

asterisk: 
  http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk
  http://asterisk.org/

meetme:   
  http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+MeetMe


-- 
there is no sig.
-- 
there is no sig.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Perl AGIs TCP Sockets

2004-11-04 Thread Andreas Sikkema
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Without code samples, it is just a guessing game.

Maybe there's a bug where the TCP stuff is writing 
to fd(0), which IIRC is STDIN

Guessing is fun!

-- 
Andreas SikkemaRits tele.com
Scheepmakersstraat 11  3011 VH Rotterdam
t: +31 (0)10 2245544f: +31 (0)10 2245540
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.2-CVS RPM update

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew McRory

I've uploaded new packages to fix a couple of problems in the previous 
releases. Again, these are for FC1 and are located in the standard place:

ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/releases/FC1/asterisk-v1.0/

Regards,

-- 
Andrew McRory - President/CTO 
Linux Systems Engineers, Inc. - http://www.linuxsys.com
Located in beautiful Tallahassee, Florida
Office  850-224-5737
Office  850-575-7213
Mobile  850-294-7567


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk as sip proxy registrar

2004-11-04 Thread Asterisk .
Hello,

--- Anand S. Katti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1000
 register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1001
 register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1002

Remove these register lines. You dont need them as your UACs are trying to register 
with
Asterisk.

 [sourabha]
 username=1001

The context name and username should be the same. Try making these changes and it 
should
be up.

Regards, Girish



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Mike Shultz




Quick Question that I hope someone can answer.
Will Asterisk work with basic PCI FaxModems instead of those expensive
cards listed on the hardware page?


--
Mike Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dynamic DNS causes problems

2004-11-04 Thread Seth Remington
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 02:58, Larry Hendrickson wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 This is my first post to this list, so I apologize if it is a newbie
 question.  I did quite a bit of reading and a number of Google searches
 for answers and found people with dynamic DNS problems, but not the
 same one.
 
 I just recently set up Asterisk as a pbx system for my home using
 Broadvoice.  I would first like to say thank-you for an incredibly
 effective program (it took me a while to get used to it, but now I am
 quite impressed).  
 
 The only remaining problem comes from the fact that I have an ADSL
 connection at my home and the pppoe changes my IP address every once in
 a while.  I have set my sip.conf 'host=' command up with a dyndns
 hostname and everything works when I start *.  The moment the IP address
 changes, though, incoming calls continue to work but outgoing calls give
 me a maximum retries exceeded error, and my Dial command exits after
 about 3 seconds with NOANSWER.  I have confirmed that this is caused
 by the change in IP address by restarting *, successfully making a call,
 rebooting my DSL router to have it get a new IP address, waiting for
 dyndns to register the change (and confirming that this is correct), and
 then immediately making another call that has this problem.  When the IP
 address doesn't change, I have confirmed that outgoing calls work after
 several days.  A 'service asterisk restart' always gets the outgoing
 calls working again, but it seems odd that I would have to restart * so
 regularly. 
 
 I am assuming that either * or the remote computer is either doing the
 DNS lookup once and caching the IP address or there is a socket that is
 opened and kept open through the IP address change and not reconnected
 afterward (shouldn't the socket on both ends figure out that the
 connection is no longer good and reconnect?).
 
 As an ugly hack, I am tempted to have a cron job check for changes in
 the ip address and restart *.  The problem with this (or one of them) is
 that I have to somehow make sure that it isn't in the middle of a phone
 call when it does this.  Is there a more elegant way of doing this?

I'm not sure about more elegant, but...

Have your cron job issue an asterisk -rx 'restart when convenient'
command instead of a hard restart. That will wait until there are no
active channels to restart. Also, issuing a 'sip reload' instead of
restarting * is probably sufficient to re-register with Broadvoice.

-Seth


 Am I doing something wrong?
 
 (And although getting a static IP would be the most elegant solution,
 that really isn't an option now.)
 
 Thank-you in advance,
 Larry
 
 
 -- sip.conf
 
 [general]
 externip=MY_HOSTNAME.dyndns.org
 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
 port=5060
 localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
 disallow=all
 allow=gsm
 allow=slinear
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw
 context=incoming
 dtmfmode=inband
 register = MY_NAME:MY_PASSWD@sip.broadvoice.com
 tos=0x18
 srvlookup=yes
 nat=no
 
 [Broadvoice]
 type=peer
 username=MY_NAME
 fromuser=MY_NAME
 secret=MY_PASSWD
 host=147.135.8.129
 context=sip
 fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
 canreinvite=no
 dtmfmode=inband
 nat=no
 
 [broadvoice-incoming]
 type=peer
 dtmfmode=inband
 host=147.135.8.128
 context=incoming
 qualify=yes
 canreinvite=no
 disallow=all
 allow=gsm
 allow=slinear
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw
 insecure=yes
 nat=no
 
 [broadvoice-incoming2]
 type=peer
 dtmfmode=inband
 host=147.135.0.128
 context=incoming
 qualify=yes
 canreinvite=no
 disallow=all
 allow=gsm
 allow=slinear
 allow=ulaw
 allow=alaw
 insecure=yes
 nat=no
 
 
 --- the extension I am calling on
 [trunkld]
 ;
 ; US long distance context accessed through trunk
 ;
 
 ;Pattern match US long distance calls
 exten = _NX,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],20)
 exten = _NX,2,Goto(error-${DIALSTATUS},1)
 exten = _NX,3,Congestion
 exten = _NX,102,Busy 

-- 
Seth Remington
SaberLogic, LLC
661-B Weber Drive
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
Phone: (330)335-6442
Fax: (330)336-8559

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Damon Estep





  
  Quick Question that I hope someone 
  can answer. Will Asterisk work with basic PCI FaxModems instead of those 
  expensive cards listed on the hardware page?--Mike 
  Shultz[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Answer is here http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Hardware
  Answers to the next several questions you will have are 
  here http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk
  This is just one of the several sites 
  dedicated to answering basic 
questions
  
  There areinexpensive intel chipset 
  modems that will act like the Digium single port FXO card - read the hardware 
  section.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread dean collins








Hi Mike,

Yes it may work with some modems depending
on which chipset they use (in fact there are some advertised as supporting
asterisk) however a number of us choose to buy from Digium in order to show our
support for how much effort they put in by developing Asterisk.





Cheers,

Dean













From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Shultz
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004
10:11 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
Support





Quick Question that I hope someone
can answer. Will Asterisk work with basic PCI FaxModems instead of those
expensive cards listed on the hardware page?


--
Mike Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Multi-line analog phones with Asterisk?

2004-11-04 Thread Richard Reina
I am interested in implementing Asterisk and someday
hope to have it replace my 8 x 24 Nortel switch. 
However, I was told by a Telcom friend that my multi
line phones (Nortel 7208s) may not work with Asterisk.
 This is a huge concern because in my business we are
constantly jumping back from one line to another
(putting people on hold and grabbing another line and
going back and forth etc.)  Is it possible with
Asterisk to (or are there analog phones that allow )
access multiple lines with the press of a button, so
that if someone says Richard line 4 is for you, I
can easily put my caller on hold and grab line 4?  

Any help would be very much appreciated.

Richard

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Eicon Diva Server 4BRI

2004-11-04 Thread Damon Estep
 The reason I went with kernel 2.6.9 is that it contains all 
 the needed CAPI support while a 2.4 kernel needs to be 
 patched (check melware.de).
 I am using Fedora Core 2 with the latest kernel from rawhide 
 (2.6.9-1.640 iirc). So no requirements other than not wanting 
 to patch the kernel. An advantage imho is that my Asterisk 
 box doesn't have a Digium card for timing and on 2.6 ztdummy 
 will work without some special USB chipset. Finally afaik 2.6 
 performs better than 2.4 and I have found nothing that 
 doesn't work. If you want to go for Fedora Core maybe it is 
 an idea to wait 4 or 5 more days because then Fedora Core 3 
 will be released.
 
 Regards,
 Patrick
 
Thank you for the info, I prefer tested over new, so I might try Fedora
Core 2 on the ISDN test box. I will wait for others to try Fedora Core 3
:)

Damon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
for voice they may or may not work, but the audio quality is bound to 
be bad... unless you're really lucky :)

On Nov 4, 2004, at 16:10, Mike Shultz wrote:
Quick Question that I hope someone can answer.  Will Asterisk work 
with basic PCI FaxModems instead of those expensive cards listed on 
the hardware page?

 --
 Mike Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:10 -0500, Mike Shultz wrote:
 Quick Question that I hope someone can answer.  Will Asterisk work
 with basic PCI FaxModems instead of those expensive cards listed on
 the hardware page?

Did you bother checking the wiki or using google to check past messages?
Or did you just feel like bothering more than 8k people to do your
homework for you?

It is in the archive with all the included screaming and yelling about
how you should support Digium who gives you the software.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Seth Remington
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:10, Mike Shultz wrote:
 Quick Question that I hope someone can answer.  Will Asterisk work
 with basic PCI FaxModems instead of those expensive cards listed on
 the hardware page?

No. The wcfxo driver only works with a very specific Intel/Ambient
chipset.

-Seth

-- 
Seth Remington
SaberLogic, LLC
661-B Weber Drive
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
Phone: (330)335-6442
Fax: (330)336-8559

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] real-time-clock asterisk/meetme/ztdummy in 2.6.9 UML

2004-11-04 Thread Steve Kann
You might have better luck with app_conference (see the wiki) under 
UML..  It is probably a little more tolerant of loose timing and scheduling.

-SteveK
nils toedtmann wrote:
Hi *,
 [this goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i try to setup an VoIP conferencing server within a UML using asterisk 
and it's 'MeetMe conference bridge'. I have several UMLs running other 
services, but my asterisk know-how is poor (as you will see ;-).

Question #1: did anybody successfully implement an asterisk 
MeetMe-conference inside a 2.6-UML?

It needs a special zaptel timer. As there is no special hardware,
i have to use a ztdummy/2.6 or zaprtc:
 http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20timer
Question #2: is there any chance that either ztdummy or zaprtc
will work inside 2.6-UML?
I tried ztdummy. After frickeling the Makefile, it compiled against
the UML source tree, it loads within the UML on top of zaptel.ko
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# lsmod 
 Module  Size  Used by
 ztdummy 2628  0 
 zaptel227940  1 ztdummy

(no other modules loaded). Asterisk works (e.g. i can hear the conf-
onlyperson message when i enter the conference room). But the audio 
of the conference itself is extremly snatchy. That _may_ be a config 
problem, but a very similar configuration on a non-UML works, and un-
loading the ztdummy.ko on that system results in the same snatchy 
audio, so i suspect the ztdummy.ko or some device configuration is 
broken in my UML.

At the same time, i observe this
 http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2004/Oct/8108.html
problem within my UML, too:
 # tail -f /var/log/messages
 tail: cannot read realtime clock: Unknown error 516
and tail exits with code 1.
Question #3: is there a problem with the RTC in 2.6.9?
My host is 2.6.8.1 + skas3-2.6.7-v5 without module support:
 CONFIG_SMP=y (host is a P4 with HT)
 CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
 CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
 CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
 CONFIG_RTC=y
 CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
My guest is 2.6.9, with module support. Besides the zaptel  
modules no feature is compiles as a module but static.
 CONFIG_UML_REAL_TIME_CLOCK=y
   

Question #4: Shall i try different SMP/HT/RTC settings on
host or guest?
Regards, /nils.

host and guest are FC2. I use the asterisk-1.0 from ATrpms
http://atrpms.net/dist/fc2/asterisk/ and seft-built
zaptel-1.0.2 tarball
user-mode-linux: 
 http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/

asterisk: 
 http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk
 http://asterisk.org/

meetme:   
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+MeetMe

 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7910 - Success?

2004-11-04 Thread Matthew Boehm
I know that the 7910 only works with Skinny. We have a possible client that
wants to bring 80 lines to us off his current provider. All 80 of his phones
are Cisco 7910s. Does anyone run 7910s with chan_sccp or the like and find
that it works good?

Thanks,
Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Jason Williams
Yes look at Ebay for x100P compatible cards



On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:10:50 -0500, Mike Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quick Question that I hope someone can answer.  Will Asterisk work with
 basic PCI FaxModems instead of those expensive cards listed on the hardware
 page?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On November 4, 2004 10:10 am, Mike Shultz wrote:
 Quick Question that I hope someone can answer.  Will Asterisk work with
 basic PCI FaxModems instead of those expensive cards listed on the
 hardware page?

Quick answer: No.  

Read up on the Wiki about this -- you can likely get it to work but you won't 
have support from Digium nor the majority of the community.  If you know what 
you're doing, go for it.  If not, make use of the support Digium is selling 
you with the card.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Multiline (4 or 8) sip phone

2004-11-04 Thread Noah Miller
What is a good multiline sip phone for an operator? Model and and
manufacturer.
The list that I came up with for multiple line/presence SIP phones is:
Snom 190, 200  (5 lines)
Snom 220 (Expandable number of lines)
Cisco 7940 (2 lines)
Cisco 7960 (6 lines)
Polycom IP 500 (3 lines)
Polycom IP 600 (6 lines)
ipDialog SipTone (2 lines)
Zultys 4x4, 4x5 (4 lines)
I'm pretty sure there are others (QTelNet, etc.) but these are the only 
ones I got a chance to test.  After testing the ones above, I found the 
Polycoms to have the best sound on handset and speakerphone.  The 
Polycoms support fewer codecs, though (ulaw, alaw, and G.729 I think).  
They are also reasonably priced compared to the Cisco models.

I had to search for this info for a LONG time.  Eventually, I'll get 
around to posting it on the Wiki.

And yes, the multiple lines are done as multiple SIP registrations with 
Asterisk.

Thanks!
Noah
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] supposable timing problem with TE100P

2004-11-04 Thread Peter Svensson
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Kurt Bauer wrote:

  Is your timing source set correctly? If you are connecting to the pstn
  the  pstn connection should be the primary timing source.
 
 connection is to a Ericsson MD110 wich is set as network, * is set as CPE.

Have you set the span as the timing source? (second number in the span 
line in zaptel.conf).

 
  What does the missed interrupts counter in cat cat /proc/zaptel/1 say?
 
 cat /proc/zaptel/1
 Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 HDB3/CCS
 
1 WCT1/0/1 Clear (In use)
2 WCT1/0/2 Clear (In use)
3 WCT1/0/3 Clear (In use)
4 WCT1/0/4 Clear (In use)

Is there no IRQ miss counter for the E100P card? 

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Here's a tough question

2004-11-04 Thread Henry Devito








HI all,



I have a question and I cant seem to find the answer
anywhere. Is there a way to limit the
amount of digits dialed? For example I
have a * box set up for the department of corrections for prisoners to call
home. It has the Digium
2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it. I have two
Lines brought in to the fxo ports and 2 standard 2500
analog sets for the prisoners to use to dial out. Everything seems to work great. We use * to record all the calls. After the prisoner dials the original number
and their PIN, I
do not want them to be able to send anymore DTMF tones. The PIN number is not processed by *. It is
processed by the LECs switch. Thanks in advance.
















___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multi-line analog phones with Asterisk?

2004-11-04 Thread Walt Reed
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 07:18:38AM -0800, Richard Reina said:
 I am interested in implementing Asterisk and someday
 hope to have it replace my 8 x 24 Nortel switch. 
 However, I was told by a Telcom friend that my multi
 line phones (Nortel 7208s) may not work with Asterisk.
  This is a huge concern because in my business we are
 constantly jumping back from one line to another
 (putting people on hold and grabbing another line and
 going back and forth etc.)  Is it possible with
 Asterisk to (or are there analog phones that allow )
 access multiple lines with the press of a button, so
 that if someone says Richard line 4 is for you, I
 can easily put my caller on hold and grab line 4?  

The Nortel 7208 is a proprietary digital phone that only works with
nortel equipment, so no, you won't be able to use those phones
specifically. However, there are other multi-line phones such as the
polycom IP 500 / 600 or the Cisco IP phones that will work just fine
with asterisk.

I'm guessing, but it sounds like you have the line buttons on your
phones mapped to actual phone company lines. This is called a key
system type setup. Asterisk is a PBX. You MAY be able to make it
function like a key system, but it would be a royal pain.

http://experts.about.com/q/2419/1801187.htm

With phones that have multiple line appearances such as the polycom or
cisco phones mentioned above, you can juggle anywhere from 2 to 6 calls
for YOU specifically at once. So if you have 8 people in your office and
use phones with 6 line appearances, you could theoretically collectivly
juggle 48 calls (how insane would that be?? :-)

Anyway, Asterisk has all the features and capabilities of the big boys
- well beyond your current norstar system. Rather than someone yelling
over that you have a call on line 6, they would just transfer it to
your phone, or park the call and yell over that you have a call parked
on extension 706 or whatever, which you can go grab, or they send it to
voicemail. Flexability here is just about unlimited.

Check out:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-PBX+features
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+PBX+functions
http://www.millenigence.com/articles/asterisk-non-technical-review.pdf
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAX -- SIP DTMF

2004-11-04 Thread Matt Schulte
This may be a no brainer for some of you out there, simply put it seems
that we have a problem passing DTMF from IAX to SIP. The digits cannot
be heard coming from the IAX side nor do they seem to register in
Asterisk. This seems to happen with any Codec we use so that part has
been ruled out. Ideas? ty
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Henry Devito










I sent this to the list earlier but I never saw the post
show up, I apologize if this is a repeat post.

___

HI all,



I have a question and I cant seem to find the answer
anywhere. Is there a way to limit the
amount of digits dialed? For example I
have a * box set up for the department of corrections for prisoners to call
home. It has the Digium
2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it. I have two
Lines brought in to the fxo ports and 2 standard 2500
analog sets for the prisoners to use to dial out. Everything seems to work great. We use * to record all the calls. After the prisoner dials the original number
and their PIN, I
do not want them to be able to send anymore DTMF tones. The PIN number is not processed by *. It is
processed by the LECs switch. Thanks in advance














___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] res_features.so Segmentation fault

2004-11-04 Thread Serge



Sorry, problem solved, it's my 
mistake..

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Serge 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:38 
  AM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] res_features.so 
  Segmentation fault
  
  Have anyone 
  some idea ?Asterisk - latest 
  cvs,RedHat9==Asterisk 
  Dynamic Loader Starting: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modules.conf': 
  Found[chan_modem.so] = (Generic Voice Modem Driver) == 
  Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modem.conf': Found == Loading modem driver 
  chan_modem_aopen.so = (A/Open (Rockwell Chipset)ITU-2 VoiceModem 
  Driver) == Registered channel type 'Modem' (Generic Voice Modem 
  Channel Driver)[res_adsi.so] = (ADSI Resource) == 
  Parsing '/etc/asterisk/adsi.conf': Found[res_features.so] = 
  (Call Parking Resource) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/features.conf': 
  Found -- Registered extension context 
  'parkedcalls'Segmentation 
  faultThanks.Serge.
  
  

  ___Asterisk-Users 
  mailing 
  list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
  UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multiline (4 or 8) sip phone

2004-11-04 Thread TC
 The list that I came up with for multiple line/presence SIP phones is:
 
 Snom 190, 200  (5 lines)
 Snom 220 (Expandable number of lines)
 Cisco 7940 (2 lines)
 Cisco 7960 (6 lines)
 Polycom IP 500 (3 lines)
 Polycom IP 600 (6 lines)
 ipDialog SipTone (2 lines)
 Zultys 4x4, 4x5 (4 lines)
aastra 480i (4 lines SIP,MGCP) 
http://www.sayson.com/product/voip_phone.htm
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] H323 ISDN

2004-11-04 Thread Huddleston, Robert
I'm assuming nobody has experience with running ISDN / BRI over H.323...
 

-Original Message-
From: Huddleston, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 8:22 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] H323 ISDN

All I need some help here!!!
I've configured our * to use OH323 Channel driver as we have a Lucent VoIP
box that would only work with OH323 channel driver.
I'm trying to run ISDN over H323 - the Lucent VoIP box supports the ISDN
over H323 - but it appears that during registration of the line I get all
sorts of troubles..

Has anyone been able to use ISDN over H323 on *...

I figured that if I could get ISDN BRI working over H323 then I could have
multiple call appearances and do some other cool stuff with DID etc...

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Newbie question: forwarding call from PSTN to VoIP

2004-11-04 Thread Luciano Macedo Rodrigues
Hi,

That's problaby a easy question to solve but I couldn't figure out how to do
what I need.

My PSTN line is connected to a phone and a FXO card. What I need is when
someone calls me, and I don't answer in 3 or 4 rings, * makes a VoIP call to
my office, where I'll pickup that call. Or I want to configure that, for
example, if I know that nobody will be at home, I want to set that the phone
immediately is forwarded to my office.

Configuration examples? Where I configure this? Please?


Thank you very much. Cheers,

Luciano Macedo Rodrigues
Opensoft - Porto Alegre/RS


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On November 4, 2004 10:56 am, Henry Devito wrote:
 I have a question and I can't seem to find the answer anywhere.  Is there a
 way to limit the amount of digits dialed?  For example I have a * box set
 up for the department of corrections for prisoners to call home.  It has
 the Digium 2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it.  I have two Lines brought in to the fxo
 ports and 2 standard 2500 analog sets for the prisoners to use to dial out.
 Everything seems to work great.  We use * to record all the calls.  After
 the prisoner dials the original number and their PIN,  I do not want them
 to be able to send anymore DTMF tones.  The PIN number is not processed by
 *. It is processed by the LEC's switch.  Thanks in advance

I just did something similar:

[recordcall]
exten = s,1,SetVar(CALLFILENAME=/tmp/calls/${CALLERIDNUM}-${TIMESTAMP})
exten = s,2,Monitor(wav,${CALLFILENAME},m)
exten = s,3,Playback(agent-pass)
exten = s,4,DISA(/path/to/asterisk/passwd/file)

and then just make sure that the extension you dump them in to does not allow 
them to dial anything ohter than what you want (i.e. 7-digit #s or whatnot)

I don't know of any way to suppress DTMF if that's what you're talking about.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Stop AGI proccess after user hang-up

2004-11-04 Thread Victor Cartes
Does anybody know how to stop the AGI process after the user Hang-Up? 'Cause 
it stills running if the transaction is ended by the user.

Thanks
Víctor 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] res_features.so Segmentation fault

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 16:57 +0100, Serge wrote:
 Sorry, problem solved, it's my mistake..

Please share more information. Asterisk shouldn't segfault on simple
user problems.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] chan_capi patch : fax support

2004-11-04 Thread Carl Sempla
Hello,

For those of you who have a CAPI card with an on-board DSP (like some Eicon
Diva Server), this patch allows you to receive faxes.
If you want to answer a channel in fax mode, use capiAnswerFax() instead of
Answer()
If you use Answer(), you will be in voice mode. If the hardware DSP detects
a fax tone, you can switch from voice to fax mode by calling
capiAnswerFax().

Example of use :
line number 123, play something, if a fax tone is detected, handle it
line number 124, answer directly in fax mode

[incoming]
exten = 123,1,Answer()
exten = 123,2,BackGround(jpop)
exten = 124,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1)
exten = fax,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1)

[handle_fax]
exten = s,1,capiAnswerFax(/tmp/${UNIQUEID})
exten = s,2,Hangup()
exten = h,1,deadagi,fax.php // Run sfftobmp and mail it.

The output of capiAnswerFax is a SFF file. Use sfftobmp to convert it.
With a Diva Server, theses features are allowed : fax up to 33600, high
resolution. Color Fax /JPEG Compression is disabled (I can't test it).

You can download the patch at :
http://www.mlkj.net/asterisk/chan_capi-0.3.5-patch.tar.bz2

A fix for a dead lock issue is also included (Oct 22 18:06:00
WARNING[11275]: channel.c:472 ast_channel_walk_locked: Avoided initial
deadlock for 'CAPI[contr1/173720007]/7', 10 retries!)

-- 
Carl

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] avm fritz box fon

2004-11-04 Thread Thomas Niesel
Hi List
I recently got one of those boxes (without wlan).
Works as ata device with my local asterisk.
Just tested the basic stuff like call the box and make call from the box.

It uses sip with alaw/ulaw/g726 codecs.
Runs on linux, kernel 2.4.17, mipsel.

HardWare:
-wan (UR2/annexB)
-ethernet (10/100)
-usb (usb-net) 
-3 capicontrolers (avm-fcclassic) 1 for fxo, 2 for fxs 
-16MB flash with squashfs
-4MB memory...

SoftWare:
-busybox
-telnetd
-webserver

Connections:
-wan (Modem on board)
-lan
-usb
-fxo (isdn or anlog)
-2fxs

Nice box maybe one day someone replaces the avm-software with asterisk!
It looks like almost the same arch as the linksys-router.

I will shortly set up some detailed readme about the inside.

-- 
Tho/\/\as
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?

2004-11-04 Thread Bill Bradford
I'm in the process of building up a small (1x1) test Asterisk box
based on a 1Ghz VIA C3 Mini-ITX box with one PCI slot (and a FX100P).

Anyone have suggestions as to the best Linux distribution (or kernel)
to base the system on?

I'll just have one FXO/POTS line and then a Grandstream Budgetone 101
IP phone; this is more for playing with IVR functionality than
anything else.

Thanks.

Bill
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100P noise on ADSL line.

2004-11-04 Thread WipeOut
Following on from the message below I have discovered that the X100P 
causes the SNR on my ADSL line to drop even with the Asterisk box 
**switched off** and the power unplugged... This seems very strange.. 
Why should a card in a switched off PC cause noise on a line meaning 
that it drops out and has to reconnect quite often..

Anyone got any other ideas to try and stop it messing up my internet 
connection cos its causing havoc with my VoIP calls coming in and going 
out over the ADSL line..

Later..
WipeOut wrote:
Hi,
This may be one for the broadband guru's out there..
I have a single analog line coming into the house.. This line is for 
my ADSL and home phone.. My Asterisk box uses an X100P card to connect 
to the analog line.. I have a microfilter on the line etc.. The rest 
of my phone system works inbound and outbound calls via a VoIP 
provider over the ADSL line..

The problem I am having is that the X100P seems to introduce a lot of 
noise on the line when it its connected to the phone socket on the 
microfilter and this causes the ADSL quality to drop quite badly.. 
When the X100P is not connected I have a signal to noise ratio of 29dB 
downstream and 30dB upstream (this stays the same when I connect an 
analog phone) when I connect the X100P the SNR drops to 12dB 
downstream and 30dB upstream.. At 12dB I get a large number of CRC 
errors and errored seconds on the ADSL connection..

Anyone got any ideas why the X100P would cause this kind of 
deterioration?

Only thing I can think of is possibly something to do with ring 
detection or that its acting on some of the frequencies that are being 
used by the ADSL..

Thanks for any thoughts..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ValetParking

2004-11-04 Thread Glenn Dalgliesh
Does anyone that the source for app_valetparking.c 

Thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_capi patch : fax support

2004-11-04 Thread Patrick
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 17:31, Carl Sempla wrote:
 Hello,
 
 For those of you who have a CAPI card with an on-board DSP (like some Eicon
 Diva Server), this patch allows you to receive faxes.
[snip]
 A fix for a dead lock issue is also included (Oct 22 18:06:00
 WARNING[11275]: channel.c:472 ast_channel_walk_locked: Avoided initial
 deadlock for 'CAPI[contr1/173720007]/7', 10 retries!)

Hi Carl,

Thanks for the patch. I'll apply it later today and give it a whirl.
Maybe it is an idea to send the patch also to kapejod who wrote
chan_capi. His site/contact details can be found at www.junghanns.net

Regards,
Patrick
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On November 4, 2004 11:39 am, Bill Bradford wrote:
 Anyone have suggestions as to the best Linux distribution (or kernel)
 to base the system on?

I'm a fan of a trimmed-down slackware but there are smaller distros yet.  My 
entire * setup fits into less than 500MB and that's without really cutting in 
there and trimming things out.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] system errors

2004-11-04 Thread kyle Hagan
Im getting the following error when I do an strace -p # for asterisk 
. Its  taking alot of resources.

ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xb290) = -1 EIO 
(Input/output error)
write(1, voip1*CLI , 11) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)

I checked the WIKI and the list and found nothing.
Kyle
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] system errors

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:11 -0700, kyle Hagan wrote:
 Im getting the following error when I do an strace -p # for asterisk 
 . Its  taking alot of resources.
 
 ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xb290) = -1 EIO 
 (Input/output error)
 write(1, voip1*CLI , 11) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
 
 I checked the WIKI and the list and found nothing.

strace takes a lot of resources and depending on the driver for the
display, you can really suck a lot of CPU just trying to keep up with
the output.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multi-line analog phones with Asterisk?

2004-11-04 Thread Richard Reina
Thank you very much for your thoghtful and thorough
response.

I guess I don't wan't to set up * to behave like a key
system, thank godness, I just want to be able to
juggle calls which it sould like Asterisk can do fine.

Just to clarify though, can the polycom IP 500 / 600
work on analog lines?

Thanks Again,

Richard

--- Walt Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 07:18:38AM -0800, Richard
 Reina said:
  I am interested in implementing Asterisk and
 someday
  hope to have it replace my 8 x 24 Nortel switch. 
  However, I was told by a Telcom friend that my
 multi
  line phones (Nortel 7208s) may not work with
 Asterisk.
   This is a huge concern because in my business we
 are
  constantly jumping back from one line to another
  (putting people on hold and grabbing another line
 and
  going back and forth etc.)  Is it possible with
  Asterisk to (or are there analog phones that allow
 )
  access multiple lines with the press of a button,
 so
  that if someone says Richard line 4 is for you,
 I
  can easily put my caller on hold and grab line 4? 
 
 
 The Nortel 7208 is a proprietary digital phone that
 only works with
 nortel equipment, so no, you won't be able to use
 those phones
 specifically. However, there are other multi-line
 phones such as the
 polycom IP 500 / 600 or the Cisco IP phones that
 will work just fine
 with asterisk.
 
 I'm guessing, but it sounds like you have the line
 buttons on your
 phones mapped to actual phone company lines. This is
 called a key
 system type setup. Asterisk is a PBX. You MAY be
 able to make it
 function like a key system, but it would be a royal
 pain.
 
 http://experts.about.com/q/2419/1801187.htm
 
 With phones that have multiple line appearances such
 as the polycom or
 cisco phones mentioned above, you can juggle
 anywhere from 2 to 6 calls
 for YOU specifically at once. So if you have 8
 people in your office and
 use phones with 6 line appearances, you could
 theoretically collectivly
 juggle 48 calls (how insane would that be?? :-)
 
 Anyway, Asterisk has all the features and
 capabilities of the big boys
 - well beyond your current norstar system. Rather
 than someone yelling
 over that you have a call on line 6, they would just
 transfer it to
 your phone, or park the call and yell over that you
 have a call parked
 on extension 706 or whatever, which you can go grab,
 or they send it to
 voicemail. Flexability here is just about unlimited.
 
 Check out:
 
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-PBX+features
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+PBX+functions

http://www.millenigence.com/articles/asterisk-non-technical-review.pdf
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] system errors

2004-11-04 Thread kyle Hagan
Im not running strace constantly, I just run it to see whats going on. 
And that error it coming in on the Asterisk PID at a rate of about 10 
per second, from what I can see.

Kyle
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:11 -0700, kyle Hagan wrote:
 

Im getting the following error when I do an strace -p # for asterisk 
. Its  taking alot of resources.

ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xb290) = -1 EIO 
(Input/output error)
write(1, voip1*CLI , 11) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)

I checked the WIKI and the list and found nothing.
   

strace takes a lot of resources and depending on the driver for the
display, you can really suck a lot of CPU just trying to keep up with
the output.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] system errors

2004-11-04 Thread kyle Hagan
Im not running strace constantly, I just run it to see whats going on. 
And that error it coming in on the Asterisk PID at a rate of about 10 
per second, from what I can see.

here is my TOP:
Cpu(s):  86.3% user,  13.7% system,   0.0% nice,   0.0% idle
Mem:904204k total,   862688k used,41516k free,0k buffers
Swap:  1004020k total,0k used,  1004020k free,   578036k cached
PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
10744 root  20   0  1400 1400 1096 R 50.0  0.2 699:46.68 asterisk  
23199 root  19   0  1408 1408 1096 R 49.7  0.2 536:18.27 asterisk
13838 root   9   0  7404 7332 3644 R  0.3  0.8   0:00.14 asterisk

its showing 50% CPU x 2.
when I strace -p 10744 or strace -p 23199 thats when I get the error.
Kyle
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:11 -0700, kyle Hagan wrote:
 

Im getting the following error when I do an strace -p # for asterisk 
. Its  taking alot of resources.

ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xb290) = -1 EIO 
(Input/output error)
write(1, voip1*CLI , 11) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)

I checked the WIKI and the list and found nothing.
   

strace takes a lot of resources and depending on the driver for the
display, you can really suck a lot of CPU just trying to keep up with
the output.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Henry Devito
The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that companies
DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress dtmf
after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kohlsmith
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

On November 4, 2004 10:56 am, Henry Devito wrote:
 I have a question and I can't seem to find the answer anywhere.  Is there
a
 way to limit the amount of digits dialed?  For example I have a * box set
 up for the department of corrections for prisoners to call home.  It has
 the Digium 2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it.  I have two Lines brought in to the
fxo
 ports and 2 standard 2500 analog sets for the prisoners to use to dial
out.
 Everything seems to work great.  We use * to record all the calls.  After
 the prisoner dials the original number and their PIN,  I do not want them
 to be able to send anymore DTMF tones.  The PIN number is not processed by
 *. It is processed by the LEC's switch.  Thanks in advance

I just did something similar:

[recordcall]
exten = s,1,SetVar(CALLFILENAME=/tmp/calls/${CALLERIDNUM}-${TIMESTAMP})
exten = s,2,Monitor(wav,${CALLFILENAME},m)
exten = s,3,Playback(agent-pass)
exten = s,4,DISA(/path/to/asterisk/passwd/file)

and then just make sure that the extension you dump them in to does not
allow 
them to dial anything ohter than what you want (i.e. 7-digit #s or whatnot)

I don't know of any way to suppress DTMF if that's what you're talking
about.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?

2004-11-04 Thread Jay Milk
I'm using RH9 and Mandrake 10, because they were easy to install.  I
heard good things about Gentoo when properly built and tweaked, but it
requires some effort.  Search the list archives for previous
discussions.

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:40 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?
 
 
 I'm in the process of building up a small (1x1) test Asterisk 
 box based on a 1Ghz VIA C3 Mini-ITX box with one PCI slot 
 (and a FX100P).
 
 Anyone have suggestions as to the best Linux distribution (or 
 kernel) to base the system on?
 
 I'll just have one FXO/POTS line and then a Grandstream 
 Budgetone 101 IP phone; this is more for playing with IVR 
 functionality than anything else.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Bill
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster isk-users
 To 
 UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop AGI proccess after user hang-up

2004-11-04 Thread Nahuel Alejandro Ramos
You have to use DeadAGI instead of AGI to call your script, for example:

exten = 77,1,Answer
exten = 77,2,DeadAGI(astcc.agi)
exten = 77,3,Hangup

Regards..

  Nahuel Ramos.


On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:14:56 -0400, Victor Cartes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anybody know how to stop the AGI process after the user Hang-Up? 'Cause
 it stills running if the transaction is ended by the user.
 
 Thanks
 
 Víctor
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] OT: anyone using pointone?

2004-11-04 Thread Matt Hess
Sorry for the OT message but I'm very curious to see if anyone on this 
list uses pointone for long distance sip call termination?

We've been having an off and on problem with them saying they do not 
support sip message with a fqdn in the from field.. which to me appears 
to be a breakage of the sip rfc.. and to top it off all our other calls 
process through them just fine expect to a current problem area code out 
in California.. I feel they are giving us a very generic white-washed 
answer and do not wish to actually provide good customer service.. 
opinions, comments, or cuss words?


begin:vcard
fn:Matt Hess
n:Hess;Matt
org:LiveWireNet
adr;dom:;;4577 Pecos St;Denver;CO;80211
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Network Engineer
tel;work:303-458-5667
tel;fax:303-458-5725
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.livewirenet.com/
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 11:30 -0600, Henry Devito wrote:
 The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
 numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that companies
 DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress dtmf
 after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?

look at the code for # transfer, Asterisk is finding the DTMF while a
call is in progress. You could probably do something along the way of
checking the call timer and once it exceeds a certain point, all DTMFs
are just ignored. It doesn't seem like it would be difficult, but I
haven't looked at the code, nor thought about how that could be merged
back into the codebase as a configurable option.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
 Kohlsmith
 Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 10:13 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones
 
 On November 4, 2004 10:56 am, Henry Devito wrote:
  I have a question and I can't seem to find the answer anywhere.  Is there
 a
  way to limit the amount of digits dialed?  For example I have a * box set
  up for the department of corrections for prisoners to call home.  It has
  the Digium 2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it.  I have two Lines brought in to the
 fxo
  ports and 2 standard 2500 analog sets for the prisoners to use to dial
 out.
  Everything seems to work great.  We use * to record all the calls.  After
  the prisoner dials the original number and their PIN,  I do not want them
  to be able to send anymore DTMF tones.  The PIN number is not processed by
  *. It is processed by the LEC's switch.  Thanks in advance
 
 I just did something similar:
 
 [recordcall]
 exten = s,1,SetVar(CALLFILENAME=/tmp/calls/${CALLERIDNUM}-${TIMESTAMP})
 exten = s,2,Monitor(wav,${CALLFILENAME},m)
 exten = s,3,Playback(agent-pass)
 exten = s,4,DISA(/path/to/asterisk/passwd/file)
 
 and then just make sure that the extension you dump them in to does not
 allow 
 them to dial anything ohter than what you want (i.e. 7-digit #s or whatnot)
 
 I don't know of any way to suppress DTMF if that's what you're talking
 about.
 
 -A.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?

2004-11-04 Thread João Amaro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm using Fedora RC1 without problems (kernel 2.4.22)
Anyone here have tried Whitebox Respin 1 with asterisk ?
Maybe nest week i'll install a small Asterisk Server on it.
Asterisk + Apache only.



Bill Bradford wrote:
| I'm in the process of building up a small (1x1) test Asterisk box
| based on a 1Ghz VIA C3 Mini-ITX box with one PCI slot (and a
| FX100P).
|
| Anyone have suggestions as to the best Linux distribution (or
| kernel) to base the system on?
|
| I'll just have one FXO/POTS line and then a Grandstream Budgetone
| 101 IP phone; this is more for playing with IVR functionality than
| anything else.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Bill ___ Asterisk-Users
|  mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To
| UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
- --
Manuel João S. Costa Amaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 57398499
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As únicas pessoas que aprecio são os loucos: os que são loucos para
viver, loucos para falar, loucos para se salvar, desejosos de tudo ao
mesmo tempo; os que nunca bocejam nem dizem lugares-comuns, mas que
ardem, se inflamam e brilham como fabulosos fogos-de-artifício. 
(Jack Kerouac)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBimtIJUm/Bor63CERAsV+AJ9ns8COTviXq1wuq1ulRbAr017HywCgmQES
EvLwOwbb64aZoNs0Lsg/PrY=
=7olh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On November 4, 2004 12:30 pm, Henry Devito wrote:
 The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
 numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that companies
 DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress dtmf
 after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?

Without hacking the source... no.  

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip clients not longer registering

2004-11-04 Thread David Filion
Karl Brose wrote:
The REGISTER requests that your SIP UAs are sending as listed are not 
requests to *register*, but request to *unregister*
The contacts are '*'  and expirations are '0'
Granted that Asterisk doesn't do registrations correctly, but  it does 
need a proper registration request with a contact and an Expires value 
 0 to enter something in its location database.




David Filion wrote:
Hi,
We have been using Asterisk since version 0.9x with little or no 
problems.  However, for an unknow reasons, our sip clients can 
nolonger register.  We updated to Asterisk 1.0.2 hoping that would 
solve the problem, but no luck.

Here is the entry from sip.conf for one of our clients:
[10012200]
host=dynamic
nat=yes
type=friend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
username=10012200
secret=
context=1001
port=5060
quality=1000
dtmfmode=rfc2833
canreinvite=no
callerid=Muffin Man 1222333
disallow=all
allow=g729
The settings have been check in the sip client (a gs 486) and they 
match.  Below is a couple of sip sessions from when the user device 
attempts to register:

sip*CLI
Sip read:
REGISTER sip:111.222.333.444 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090
From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact: *
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
Expires: 0
User-Agent: Grandstream HT486 1.0.5.16
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE
Content-Length: 0
12 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 555.666.777.888 : 5060 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090;received=555.666.777.888;rport=1024 

From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as3055bbba
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
to 555.666.777.888:1024
Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090;received=555.666.777.888;rport=1024 

From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as3055bbba
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm=asterisk, nonce=626079d1
Content-Length: 0
to 555.666.777.888:1024
Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 
15000 ms
sip*CLI

Sip read:
REGISTER sip:111.222.333.444 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090
From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact: *
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
Expires: 0
User-Agent: Grandstream HT486 1.0.5.16
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE
Content-Length: 0
12 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 555.666.777.888 : 5060 (NAT)
Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090;received=555.666.777.888;rport=1024 

From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as3055bbba
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
to 555.666.777.888:1024
Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090;received=555.666.777.888;rport=1024 

From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as3055bbba
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm=asterisk, nonce=626079d1
Content-Length: 0
to 555.666.777.888:1024
Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 
15000 ms
sip*CLI

Sip read:
REGISTER sip:111.222.333.444 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090
From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact: *
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
Expires: 0
User-Agent: Grandstream HT486 1.0.5.16
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE
Content-Length: 0
12 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 555.666.777.888 : 5060 (NAT)
Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
555.666.777.888;branch=z9hG4bKd4dd151b65533090;received=555.666.777.888;rport=1024 

From: David Filion sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=706ef4f92086984a
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as3055bbba
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 100 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?

2004-11-04 Thread David Filion
João Amaro wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm using Fedora RC1 without problems (kernel 2.4.22)
Anyone here have tried Whitebox Respin 1 with asterisk ?
Maybe nest week i'll install a small Asterisk Server on it.
Asterisk + Apache only.



Bill Bradford wrote:
| I'm in the process of building up a small (1x1) test Asterisk box
| based on a 1Ghz VIA C3 Mini-ITX box with one PCI slot (and a
| FX100P).
|
| Anyone have suggestions as to the best Linux distribution (or
| kernel) to base the system on?
|
| I'll just have one FXO/POTS line and then a Grandstream Budgetone
| 101 IP phone; this is more for playing with IVR functionality than
| anything else.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Bill ___ Asterisk-Users
|  mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To
| UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|
- --
Manuel João S. Costa Amaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 57398499
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As únicas pessoas que aprecio são os loucos: os que são loucos para
viver, loucos para falar, loucos para se salvar, desejosos de tudo ao
mesmo tempo; os que nunca bocejam nem dizem lugares-comuns, mas que
ardem, se inflamam e brilham como fabulosos fogos-de-artifício. 
(Jack Kerouac)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBimtIJUm/Bor63CERAsV+AJ9ns8COTviXq1wuq1ulRbAr017HywCgmQES
EvLwOwbb64aZoNs0Lsg/PrY=
=7olh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Wasn't there a long thread about this just last week?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ATCC - Astcc-Admin.cgi File

2004-11-04 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
Does anyone in the list have a fully functional ASTCC and 
would like to share their CGI, AGI and CONF files/Scripts 
and database installation that is customized for: 

1) Accepting user input for a Pin for authentication
2) Recognizes the caller id for authentication
3) Has a better GUI to manage the cards and users
4) PHPMysqlAdmin installation for managing the database

in exchange for a brand new 2 Port version of eezeephone(Netweb-302)

(would this offer be deemed a commercial discussion by the list?? :) )

Please contact off the list

Seshu Kanuri
732-213-2422
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does not waive 
confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and ISDN HFC-S card (Biilion) instead of Fritz Capi ?

2004-11-04 Thread HBK
Hi
I am trying the fine iso at http://www.asterisk.de.ms/ but are having 
problems with Capi probably due to having to old Fritz PCI card. Trying 
with both non version marked version and version marked V 2.0.

I get following error when booting Astrisk on Debian:
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: kcapi: capi20 attached
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: capi20: Rev 1.1.4.2: started up with 
major 68 (
middleware+capifs)
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: AVM FRITZ!Card PCI driver, 
revision 0.2
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: (fcpci built on Jun  3 2004 at 
12:02:52)
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: Loading...
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: Driver 'fcpci' attached to stack
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: kcapi: driver fcpci attached
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: Auto-attaching...
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:0c.0
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: Error: Invalid parameters 
(base=0xe800,
irq=11)
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: fcpci: Not loaded.
Oct 31 02:26:10 asterisk kernel: kcapi: driver fcpci detached

Can anbody on the list give a clue on this problem ?
Or can you please direct me to a guide on how to install driver for 
HFC-S based ISDN card on Asterisk/Debian ?

Thank you !
HB
Norway
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Mike Shultz




Thanks to everyone who answered my stupid
question. I did not see the wiki nor an answer to my question on their
main site. My main experience is with a
3Com NBX 25 which is small and really simple so I never had to learn
much except the dial plan, which is why most of this is still foreign
to me.

I have one more question. Are there special interface cards for IP
Phone/Network connectivity or is this a job for a basic NIC? I've been
reading through the wiki on most of the protocols but it doesn't state
what media they run on. I would prefer to run this over the current
data network I already have as I would not need to run new cables. I'd
rather not use analog phones at all either so I'm not looking for one
of those S100I media converters. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

--
Mike Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Grandstream BT100 - Failed to write frame

2004-11-04 Thread davis


Hi everyone,

  I'm having problems with Playback() on a Grandstream Budge Tone-100.
Every time Playback is used I get the following messages:

WARNING[229388]: file.c:550 ast_readaudio_callback: Failed to write frame
  == Spawn extension (from-sip, , 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/2002-559c'

I tried pretty much every codec on the phone with no succes.

I'm using: Asterisk CVS-D2004.10.25.17.09.17-11/04/04-12:25:54
GrandStream Firmware: Program--1.0.4.65

sip.conf entry for the BT-100 Phone:

[BT100]
type=friend
context=from-sip
username=2002
fromuser=2002
secret=123456
host=dynamic
nat=no


The grandstream phone and asterisk are on the same lan.

Thanks a lot,
Dave







___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATCC - Astcc-Admin.cgi File

2004-11-04 Thread William Suffill
Sounds more like a requirement for custom development since I'm sure
your needs will vary from some others that are also using astcc as a
starting point for their prepaid cards

-- William
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop AGI proccess after user hang-up

2004-11-04 Thread Flynn
On 11/4/2004, Victor Cartes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anybody know how to stop the AGI process after the user Hang-Up? 'Cause 
it stills running if the transaction is ended by the user.


I'm unsure (haven't had a need yet to use AGI), but perhaps you could
use the DeadAgi application in your dialplan to execute another app that
kills the first one. Do a show application DeadAgi at the CLI.

Other than that you might have to build the logic within your AGI itself,
basically terminating it after say X seconds of no activity when the
caller's supposed to be doing something.

Flynn
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?

2004-11-04 Thread Ed Devine
I'm using * in a prepaid environment with Whitebox Respin with all the bells
and whistles loaded.

I made the move when Redhat lost their mind and discontinued support of 9.0.
The asterisk is still in test and development mode (not a lot of traffic
yet) but it seems to work okay. I am, however running an older version of
asterisk CVS from May 2004, as versions after that gave me fits with some of
the apps I depend on (playinterruptibletones for instance).

I doubt the problems I encountered were the result of the O/S, more likely
they are the result of improvements? to the asterisk CVS that conflict
with some of the apps I'm using. Installing, compiling and running * on
Whitebox was straight forward and trouble free.

- Original Message - 
From: João Amaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux base for small Asterisk server?


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

I'm using Fedora RC1 without problems (kernel 2.4.22)

Anyone here have tried Whitebox Respin 1 with asterisk ?

Maybe nest week i'll install a small Asterisk Server on it.

Asterisk + Apache only.







Bill Bradford wrote:

| I'm in the process of building up a small (1x1) test Asterisk box
| based on a 1Ghz VIA C3 Mini-ITX box with one PCI slot (and a
| FX100P).
|
| Anyone have suggestions as to the best Linux distribution (or
| kernel) to base the system on?
|
| I'll just have one FXO/POTS line and then a Grandstream Budgetone
| 101 IP phone; this is more for playing with IVR functionality than
| anything else.
|
| Thanks.
|
| Bill ___ Asterisk-Users
|  mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To
| UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|

- --

Manuel João S. Costa Amaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 57398499
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

As únicas pessoas que aprecio são os loucos: os que são loucos para
viver, loucos para falar, loucos para se salvar, desejosos de tudo ao
mesmo tempo; os que nunca bocejam nem dizem lugares-comuns, mas que
ardem, se inflamam e brilham como fabulosos fogos-de-artifício.
(Jack Kerouac)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBimtIJUm/Bor63CERAsV+AJ9ns8COTviXq1wuq1ulRbAr017HywCgmQES
EvLwOwbb64aZoNs0Lsg/PrY=
=7olh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question: forwarding call from PSTN to VoIP

2004-11-04 Thread Greg Hill
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Luciano Macedo Rodrigues wrote:
 That's problaby a easy question to solve but I couldn't figure out how to do
 what I need.

 My PSTN line is connected to a phone and a FXO card. What I need is when
 someone calls me, and I don't answer in 3 or 4 rings, * makes a VoIP call to
 my office, where I'll pickup that call. Or I want to configure that, for
 example, if I know that nobody will be at home, I want to set that the phone
 immediately is forwarded to my office.

 Configuration examples? Where I configure this? Please?

It would be configured in extensions.conf. Maybe a timeout on your Dial()
will help accomplish what you're after. For example:
exten = 100,1,Dial(ZAPexten,10)
exten = 100,2,Dial(SIP/youroffice,10)

would ring the zap extension for 10 seconds, then try the SIP extension
for 10 seconds, and then would drop off to somewhere (you might want to
route to voicemail, or play an automated greeting, or simply hang up the
call).

Use the help facility in the CLI ('show application dial') to find out
more.

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multi-line analog phones with Asterisk?

2004-11-04 Thread Scott Laird
On Nov 4, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Richard Reina wrote:
Thank you very much for your thoghtful and thorough
response.
I guess I don't wan't to set up * to behave like a key
system, thank godness, I just want to be able to
juggle calls which it sould like Asterisk can do fine.
Just to clarify though, can the polycom IP 500 / 600
work on analog lines?
It depends on what you mean by analog lines.  If you mean will it 
work with calls that come into Asterisk over analog phone lines then 
the answer is yes--the phones don't know or care how the phone call 
made its way into Asterisk.  If you mean can I plug the Polycom 
IP500/600 into a regular analog phone jack then the answer is no--they 
plug into an Ethernet jack, not an analog phone jack.

Scott
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Passing callerID info to a forwarded line

2004-11-04 Thread Chris Goodwin
Hi everyone,
I have a question regarding the use of callerID and call 
forwarding.  When I forward any of my Zap extensions in 
the office to an outside line, such as a cell phone, the 
callerID info shows up as originating from that office 
phone, rather than from whoever actually originated the 
call into that office phone.  Does anyone have an idea of 
how to pass the callerID info of the originating caller to 
the forwarded phone?

Thanks,
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] ATCC - Astcc-Admin.cgi File

2004-11-04 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
Not necessarily. The need is a generic calling card app - take user
Input or recognize the ANI, Allow the calls
The users and pins are stored in Mysql database

In order to make the database easy to manage - as the users and pins are
stored in Mysql database,
PHPMysqlAdmin (which is a generic GNU install) is a much more preferred
way for me to manage the 
user data, as that way I can upload and download tonnes of Pins and
users in one go. 

Also PHPMysqlAdmin helps the Admin and make it is easy to drop them
quickly.
Reporting is another need for needing to use PHPMysqlAdmin, so that we
can give a frontend to 
the user to check their calls and CDRs, in a few minutes of effort.

Seshu Kanuri

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
Suffill
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:19 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATCC - Astcc-Admin.cgi File

Sounds more like a requirement for custom development since I'm sure
your needs will vary from some others that are also using astcc as a
starting point for their prepaid cards

-- William
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does not waive 
confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Multi-line analog phones with Asterisk?

2004-11-04 Thread Richard Reina
Thank you very much for that clarification.  
--- Scott Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Nov 4, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Richard Reina wrote:
 
  Thank you very much for your thoghtful and
 thorough
  response.
 
  I guess I don't wan't to set up * to behave like a
 key
  system, thank godness, I just want to be able to
  juggle calls which it sould like Asterisk can do
 fine.
 
  Just to clarify though, can the polycom IP 500 /
 600
  work on analog lines?
 
 It depends on what you mean by analog lines.  If
 you mean will it 
 work with calls that come into Asterisk over analog
 phone lines then 
 the answer is yes--the phones don't know or care how
 the phone call 
 made its way into Asterisk.  If you mean can I plug
 the Polycom 
 IP500/600 into a regular analog phone jack then the
 answer is no--they 
 plug into an Ethernet jack, not an analog phone
 jack.
 
 
 Scott
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Hardware Support

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:15 -0500, Mike Shultz wrote:
 Thanks to everyone who answered my stupid question.  I did not see the
 wiki nor an answer to my question on their main site.  My main
 experience is with a 3Com NBX 25 which is small and really simple so I
 never had to learn much except the dial plan, which is why most of
 this is still foreign to me.
 
 I have one more question.  Are there special interface cards for IP
 Phone/Network connectivity or is this a job for a basic NIC?  I've
 been reading through the wiki on most of the protocols but it doesn't
 state what media they run on.  I would prefer to run this over the
 current data network I already have as I would not need to run new
 cables.  I'd rather not use analog phones at all either so I'm not
 looking for one of those S100I media converters.  Any suggestions
 would be appreciated.

At least based on your stated background this one isn't stupid. You are
correct in your assumption though that the VoIP part is just packets for
the NIC to handle. There is no special hardware for it. Although when
you get to some of the conference portions of asterisk, you will need a
timing source that is provided either by the PSTN hardware Digium sells
or via psuedo devices such as the ZapRTC or ztdummy interface.

-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop AGI proccess after user hang-up

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:14 -0400, Victor Cartes wrote:
 Does anybody know how to stop the AGI process after the user Hang-Up? 'Cause 
 it stills running if the transaction is ended by the user.

You must handle t his in your AGI application. If you start getting back
broken reads from the STDIN filehandle, the other side of the pipe has
gone away and you need to clean up and exit. Also most AGI commands will
let you know when asterisk has detected a hangup or other failure
condition and you should handle those appropriately.

-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Passing callerID info to a forwarded line

2004-11-04 Thread Nate Carlson
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Chris Goodwin wrote:
I have a question regarding the use of callerID and call forwarding. 
When I forward any of my Zap extensions in the office to an outside 
line, such as a cell phone, the callerID info shows up as originating 
from that office phone, rather than from whoever actually originated the 
call into that office phone. Does anyone have an idea of how to pass the 
callerID info of the originating caller to the forwarded phone?
Area you using a PRI line, or what?
If a PRI, you need your provider to allow you to set the outgoing CallerID 
to whatever you'd like, instead of just one of your own numbers.

If BRI, Analog, etc, I don't think there is a way to set your own 
CallerID.


| nate carlson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.natecarlson.com |
|   depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981|

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Is it possible to use IAXY device to make 56K modem calls

2004-11-04 Thread Jerry Geis
ALL,
is it possible to plug a standard analog 56K modem into my
iaxy device and make a modem call out? 9600 baud call would
be fine actually. I just want to make a call out with my iAXy
device and eliminate my PSTN line.
THanks,
Jerry
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Flynn
On 11/4/2004, Henry Devito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that companies
DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress dtmf
after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?


My, prisoners are getting devious :)

Anyways, you'd only be able to do this by hacking the code, as others
have pointed out. What you want is in res_features.c (if I understand
the code correctly), in the function called ast_bridge_call. On *
release 1.0.1 it's somewhere on line 520:

if (f  (f-frametype == AST_FRAME_DTMF)) {
  if (who == peer)
ast_write(chan, f);
  else
ast_write(peer, f);
}

So you'd have to hack it by disabling commenting out that section. I
think this bit of code is only executed once the two legs of the call
are bridged, so it probably wouldn't affect anything else.

I also think that if you were at some point required to be able to send
DTMF after the initial dial pattern, you could programmatically via the
dialplan use the D option in the Dial application to send dtmf
digits.

Hope you do test this out before putting it live ;) Free advice, so
don't knock me out if it breaks something else!!

Flynn
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Grandstream BT100 - Does not recognize DTMF

2004-11-04 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
One of my customers use Grandstream for ASTCC and it suddenly stopped
recognizing 
DTMF for my ASTCC Application. 

When ASTCC asks to enter destination number, and when the the digits 
Are entered, the phone keys does not take any of them. They are dead.

Any suggestions

Seshu Kanuri 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does not waive 
confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist back

2004-11-04 Thread Ashling O'Driscoll
from 172.16.3.13
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:55:30 -
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I hope someone can shed some light on the following: - I came across
a thread with a similiar problem but it didnt fix the problem=2E

I have two windows messenger clients registered with asterisk=2E When I
execute the command 'show sip peers', I can see them online=2E However
they cannot see each other and I am getting the following error:

-- Got SIP response 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist back
from 172=2E16=2E3=2E13
 -- Got SIP response 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
back from 172=2E16=2E3=2E17

I cannot see anything in 'show sip registry' and I'm wondering if
maybe that has anything got to do with it=2E=20

Anyway I read in a previous post from a person who had similiar
problems that if I change allow=3Dall to diallow=3Dall and allow=3Dulaw in=

the sip=2Econf file, the problem will be fixed=2E I also looked at the
OnLamp config site and followed their instructions there as this
person did=2E
However this is not solving the problem=2E I have included my config
files below and would be extremely grateful if anyone had any ideas
on the problem=2E

sip=2Econf

[general]

port =3D 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr =3D 0=2E0=2E0=2E0 ; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine)=

diallow=3Dall=20
allow=3Dulaw
context =3D from-sip ; Send SIP callers that we don't know about here

;register =3D 2000:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[2000]

type=3Dfriend ; This device takes and makes calls
username=3D2000 ; Username on device
secret=3Dsuzuki ; Password for device
host=3Ddynamic ; This host is not on the same IP addr every
time
mailbox=3D100 ; Activate the message waiting light if this
 ; voicemailbox has messages in it

; Windows messenger client1

[2001] ; Duplicate of 2000, except with different auth
data

type=3Dfriend
username=3D2001
secret=3Dbla
host=3Ddynamic
mailbox=3D101

;Windows Messenger Client2

[odriscolla] ; Duplicate of 2000, except with different auth
data

type=3Dfriend
username=3Dodriscolla
secret=3Dpatoldham
host=3Ddynamic
mailbox=3D102


;extension=2Econf

 [general]
 static=3D3Dyes
 writeprotect=3D3Dyes

 [bogon-calls]

 exten=3D3D =5F=2E,1,Congestion

 [from-sip]

 exten =3D3D odriscolla,1,Dial(SIP/odriscolla,20)
 exten =3D3D odriscolla,2,Voicemail(uodriscolla)
 exten =3D3D odriscolla,102,Voicemail(bodriscolla)
 exten =3D3D odriscolla,103,Hangup

 exten =3D3D 2001,1,Dial(SIP/2001,20)
 exten =3D3D 2001,2,Voicemail(u2001)
 exten =3D3D 2001,102,Voicemail(b2001)
 exten =3D3D 2001,103,Hangup

 exten=3D3D 2999,1,VoicemailMain(${CALLERIDNUM})

voicemail=2Econf

; voicemail=2Econf

 [general]

 format=3D3Dwav

 [local]

 odriscolla =3D3D 1234,aisling,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 2000 =3D3D 4321,julien,[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cheers,
Aisling=2E
=20


=
---Legal  Disclaimer-=
--

The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only =
for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by =
legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in erro=
r please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauth=
orised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The I=
nstitute does not guarantee the security of any information electronicall=
y transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this comm=
unication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitt=
ed by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

-=
---=


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Thompson
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On November 4, 2004 12:30 pm, Henry Devito wrote:
The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that companies
DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress dtmf
after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?
If you configured a SIP phone to not transmit inband DTMF, would 
asterisk translate that to inband DTMF when bridged to an inband DTMF 
only connection, ie your POTS line?

Note: Just talking out of my head here, I've not actually tested this...
In any case, chan_sip would be much more likely to be hackable to make 
DTMF quit working.

--
Andrew Thompson
http://aktzero.com/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Remote MWI (I know it's possible)

2004-11-04 Thread Christopher Jacob
Hey Folks,

I am trying to light a MWI located on a remote SIP phone. In other words,
the phones register to one server but the voicemail app lives on a different
one. 

I am guessing it has something to do with passing a user command in the
voicemail.conf file. 

Of course I would also need to clear it...

PLEASE let me know if anyone has any ideas.

Thanks,

Chris



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream BT100 - Does not recognize DTMF

2004-11-04 Thread Michael Giagnocavo
Maybe they switched to a codec that doesn't support inband DTMF and it isn't
configured to use SIP INFO or likewise?

-Michael

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kanuri, Seshu
(Company IT)
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 12:53 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream BT100 - Does not recognize DTMF 

One of my customers use Grandstream for ASTCC and it suddenly stopped
recognizing 
DTMF for my ASTCC Application. 

When ASTCC asks to enter destination number, and when the the digits 
Are entered, the phone keys does not take any of them. They are dead.

Any suggestions

Seshu Kanuri 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:59 -0500, Andrew Thompson wrote:
 Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
  On November 4, 2004 12:30 pm, Henry Devito wrote:
  
 The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
 numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that companies
 DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress dtmf
 after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?
 
 If you configured a SIP phone to not transmit inband DTMF, would 
 asterisk translate that to inband DTMF when bridged to an inband DTMF 
 only connection, ie your POTS line?

Depends on the codec if it would be able to detect and therefore
squelch.

 Note: Just talking out of my head here, I've not actually tested this...
 
 In any case, chan_sip would be much more likely to be hackable to make 
 DTMF quit working.

As long as asterisk is looking for DTMF, and it is connected, the best
place would be in the bridging where it is looking at the frames. As has
been posted before, when you are reading the frames as they come in, you
could just look at the frame type and decide whether it needed to be
sent or acted upon. In this case, acted upon could be dropping it to the
floor and replacing it with a silence frame of the proper duration.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Flynn
On 11/4/2004, Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


In any case, chan_sip would be much more likely to be hackable to make
DTMF quit working.


Possibly, but his working configuration most likely doesn't use SIP (I
would presume):

It has the Digium 2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it.  I have two Lines brought in
to the fxo ports and 2 standard 2500 analog sets for the prisoners to
use to dial out.

Flynn
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is it possible to use IAXY device to make 56K modem calls

2004-11-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:50 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
 ALL,
 
 is it possible to plug a standard analog 56K modem into my
 iaxy device and make a modem call out? 9600 baud call would
 be fine actually. I just want to make a call out with my iAXy
 device and eliminate my PSTN line.

Depends on network quality. Not reliably and not fast. On a clean cable
modem with a channel bank and T1 card I could occasionally get 14.4
connections but it would quickly drop to unusable as soon as either a
frame was dropped or the jitter increased.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist back

2004-11-04 Thread Flynn
On 11/4/2004, Ashling O'Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[general]

port =3D 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr =3D 0=2E0=2E0=2E0 ; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine)=

diallow=3Dall=20
allow=3Dulaw
context =3D from-sip ; Send SIP callers that we don't know about here

;register =3D 2000:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


the HTML posting sort of screwed up the content of your email, but if i
interpret it correctly it looks like you've got a line that says

diallow=all

shouldn't that be

disallow=all

Flynn
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] MEETME and PRIORITIES

2004-11-04 Thread TELUX
is it possible after a meetme call to keep going on in the context, like 
the meet me is priority 2 I want it to hit priority 3 (after the party 
disconnects)?

thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Thompson
Flynn wrote:
  Possibly, but his working configuration most likely doesn't use SIP (I
would presume):
It has the Digium 2 FXO/ 2 FXS card in it.  I have two Lines brought in
to the fxo ports and 2 standard 2500 analog sets for the prisoners to
use to dial out.
Yeah, I saw that, but the replies I'd seen so far were not looking real 
promising, so I thought I'd throw out another idea.

Even if the handsets were ruggedized, a Sipura could sit in between them 
and asterisk.

Critchfield's response about the bridge code seems the place to look, 
but that's going to require coding and testing.

If a SIP adapter could be dropped in and as a side effect of the 
configuration it broke sending DTMF out, only a few changes to the 
dialplan would be required to get things back in order.

Anyway, it was just an idea, and he did say he was looking for ideas.
--
Andrew Thompson
http://aktzero.com/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

2004-11-04 Thread dean collins
Hi Flynn,
Feel free to contact me offline if you feel this isn't suitable
conversation for online but I read an article about this a few weeks ago
about how you were freezing out other carriers for offering cheaper
calls to inmates than the inflated prices you charged. And I don't
understand how you are legally allowed to do this.

It must be profit driven because surely I could call one of my approved
numbers eg sister and then have her pass along the information to a
third party. 

Surely if you were looking to solve this 'isolation' issue and were
serious about it you would be tackling this problem another way.


Cheers,
Dean


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Flynn
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 1:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Limit DTMF tones

On 11/4/2004, Henry Devito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The issue is the inmates have figured out a way to dial long distance
numbers by calling different private phone numbers and using that
companies
DISA to complete calls. So in order to stop that I have to suppress
dtmf
after so many digits are dialed.  Any idea's?


My, prisoners are getting devious :)

Anyways, you'd only be able to do this by hacking the code, as others
have pointed out. What you want is in res_features.c (if I understand
the code correctly), in the function called ast_bridge_call. On *
release 1.0.1 it's somewhere on line 520:

if (f  (f-frametype == AST_FRAME_DTMF)) {
  if (who == peer)
ast_write(chan, f);
  else
ast_write(peer, f);
}

So you'd have to hack it by disabling commenting out that section. I
think this bit of code is only executed once the two legs of the call
are bridged, so it probably wouldn't affect anything else.

I also think that if you were at some point required to be able to send
DTMF after the initial dial pattern, you could programmatically via the
dialplan use the D option in the Dial application to send dtmf
digits.

Hope you do test this out before putting it live ;) Free advice, so
don't knock me out if it breaks something else!!

Flynn
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] NAT with Linksys

2004-11-04 Thread Nahuel Alejandro Ramos
Hi,
  I am living a wear thing. I am using my asterisk with all kind of
NAT / PAT / NPAT, with multiple ports on the same network address and
all works perfect.
  The problem I have been trying to solve is with a Cisco ATA behind a
Linksys NAT. The ATA's register work ok, but when I execute sip show
peers on the CLI I get a UNREACHABLE at the status column, and when I
try to call it, the asterisk send me to his voicemail because is
unreachable. But when the ATAs dial, the call work great.
  I have other ATAs behind other NATs (f.e. iptables) and they work perfectly.
  I have tried using the DMZ option on my linksys (putting the ATA
private IP) but I stay having the problem.
  Could anyone give me a guide to search for a solution. I have been
googleing but I could not find a solution.
  Thank you very much.

Nahuel Ramos.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist

2004-11-04 Thread Ashling O'Driscoll

Hi,

Thanks for the reply. Yes I had left out the 's'(as I had copied from
the previous thread) but that is not the problem. I still have the
'call leg transaction does not exist' error. I have included the
debug sip messages below if that will help any bit. I read that this
error should have something got to do with a sip cancel message, an
incorrect invite message or the to header. Since I am not inviting
anyone and I dont cancel I dont think they apply. However I also
think my 'to' header syntax is okso any ideas?

Thanks again,
Aisling.

Sip read:
REGISTER sip:172.16.3.15 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.13:12568
Max-Forwards: 70
From:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4c0cbfbcc5414b0b91cbf6f08d1badcb;epid
=f9d3957208
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 71 REGISTER
Contact: sip:172.16.3.13:12568;methods=INVITE, MESSAGE, INFO,
SUBSCRIBE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, NOTIFY, ACK, REFER
User-Agent: RTC/1.2.4949 (Messenger 5.0.0482)
Event: registration
Allow-Events: presence
Content-Length: 0


12 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 172.16.3.13 : 12568 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.13:12568
From:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4c0cbfbcc5414b0b91cbf6f08d1badcb;epid
=f9d3957208
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as0442c120
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 71 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0


 to 172.16.3.13:12568
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.13:12568
From:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4c0cbfbcc5414b0b91cbf6f08d1badcb;epid
=f9d3957208
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as0442c120
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 71 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm=asterisk, nonce=09fbe581
Content-Length: 0


 to 172.16.3.13:12568
Scheduling destruction of call
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms


Sip read:
REGISTER sip:172.16.3.15 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.13:12568
Max-Forwards: 70
From:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4c0cbfbcc5414b0b91cbf6f08d1badcb;epid
=f9d3957208
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 72 REGISTER
Contact: sip:172.16.3.13:12568;methods=INVITE, MESSAGE, INFO,
SUBSCRIBE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, NOTIFY, ACK, REFER
User-Agent: RTC/1.2.4949 (Messenger 5.0.0482)
Authorization: Digest username=odriscolla, realm=asterisk,
algorithm=md5, uri=sip:172.16.3.15, nonce=09fbe581,
response=488e7216327e85c4bc1976050ce81310
Event: registration
Allow-Events: presence
Content-Length: 0


13 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 172.16.3.13 : 12568 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.13:12568
From:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4c0cbfbcc5414b0b91cbf6f08d1badcb;epid
=f9d3957208
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as0442c120
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 72 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0


 to 172.16.3.13:12568
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.13:12568
From:
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4c0cbfbcc5414b0b91cbf6f08d1badcb;epid
=f9d3957208
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as0442c120
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 72 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Expires: 120
Contact: sip:172.16.3.13:12568;expires=120
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:31:22 GMT
Content-Length: 0


 to 172.16.3.13:12568
Scheduling destruction of call
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms
11 headers, 2 lines
Reliably Transmitting:
NOTIFY sip:172.16.3.13:12568 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.15:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2284d025
From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as12bc656c
To: sip:172.16.3.13:12568
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Event: message-summary
Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
Content-Length: 38

Messages-Waiting: no
Voicemail: 0/0
 (no NAT) to 172.16.3.13:12568
Scheduling destruction of call
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms


Sip read:
SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.3.15:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2284d025
From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as12bc656c
To: sip:172.16.3.13:12568;tag=a05ddee6260049778a66b59fb903130d
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
User-Agent: RTC/1.2
Content-Length: 0


8 headers, 0 lines
-- Got SIP response 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
back from 172.16.3.13
Destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

 Original Message 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
back
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 03:16:13 +0800

On 11/4/2004, Ashling O'Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[general]

port =3D 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Passing callerID info to a forwarded line

2004-11-04 Thread Scott Laird
On Nov 4, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Chris Goodwin wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a question regarding the use of callerID and call forwarding.  
When I forward any of my Zap extensions in the office to an outside 
line, such as a cell phone, the callerID info shows up as originating 
from that office phone, rather than from whoever actually originated 
the call into that office phone.  Does anyone have an idea of how to 
pass the callerID info of the originating caller to the forwarded 
phone?
First, you need a connection to the PSTN that lets you set your own 
caller ID value.  POTS lines never have this.  PRIs may, depending on 
the configuration.  Some VoIP providers let you control the caller ID 
also; NuFone does, but I'm not sure about others.

Using NuFone, it's really easy--just send the call to them without 
resetting the caller ID value that you received on the incoming call.  
In my dial plan, I created a macro that calls SetCallerID with my own 
phone number if and only if the existing caller ID value is 4 or fewer 
digits long.  Here's an example:

[macro-condsetcid]
  exten = s,1,NoOp
  exten = s,2,GotoIf($[${CALLERIDNUM:0:4} = ${CALLERIDNUM}]?3:4)
  exten = s,3,SetCallerID(425488)
  exten = s,4,NoOp
Then, in my outbound dialing context, I just do 'Macro(condsetcid)' 
before doing 'Dial(${NUFONE}/${EXTEN})'.  Works perfectly.  There are a 
couple more examples at 
http://scottstuff.net/scott/archives/cat_asterisk.html

Scott
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Is it possible to use IAXY device to make 56Kmodem calls

2004-11-04 Thread Jerry Geis
steve,
Thanks, do you recall what config commands you gave the modem 
to drop it down and only connect at lower speeds? I'm not a modem guru.

Thanks,
Jerry
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:50 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ ALL,
// 
// is it possible to plug a standard analog 56K modem into my
// iaxy device and make a modem call out? 9600 baud call would
// be fine actually. I just want to make a call out with my iAXy
// device and eliminate my PSTN line.
/
Depends on network quality. Not reliably and not fast. On a clean cable
modem with a channel bank and T1 card I could occasionally get 14.4
connections but it would quickly drop to unusable as soon as either a
frame was dropped or the jitter increased.
--
Steven Critchfield critch at basesys.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >