[Asterisk-Users] asterisk CVS-HEAD is nutzo!

2004-12-28 Thread Gabriel Afana
I probably dont know what I am doingthats all

But from a clean install I installed zaptel, libpri, asterisk CVS-HEAD and
asterisk-addons.  All went ok...but asterisk is acting crazy.  It wont let
me register any SIP channels, otherwise it hangs when I start it at the SIP
part.  When I start asterisk without anything registered, it starts but will
only process a few commands then it stops responding:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# /usr/sbin/asterisk -r
Asterisk CVS-HEAD-12/29/04-12:27:52, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium.
Written by Mark Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=
Connected to Asterisk CVS-HEAD-12/29/04-12:27:52 currently running on g0
(pid = 5343)
Usage: set verbose 
   Sets level of verbose messages to be displayed.  0 means
   no messages should be displayed. Equivalent to -v[v[v...]]
   on startup
Usage: set debug 
   Sets level of core debug messages to be displayed.  0 means
   no messages should be displayed. Equivalent to -d[d[d...]]
   on startup.
g0*CLI> show version
Asterisk CVS-HEAD-12/29/04-12:27:52 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a x86_64
running Linux
g0*CLI> stop now
g0*CLI> stop now
g0*CLI> alsdkfj
g0*CLI> alsdj;fa
g0*CLI> bla bla
g0*CLI> hello

I started with my own config files, but have gone all the way back to the
default sample filesit still does the same thing.

One quick note, on the SIP channel registration, when I register as a peer
or friend, it locks up when it loads.  If I register as a user, it asterisk
will load, however it wont work.  I have Realtime enabled through MySQL, and
its up and running and can connect and everything, but I dont have any
settings getting defined through it (via the extconfig.conf file)

I had everything working perfect for like a week using the stable
version...so not sure if this CVS-HEAD version has a lot of changes that are
making my stable config files not work or if its just not working right on
my server.

I am running RedHat Enterprise Server ES Update 4 on AMD64 platform.

I am going to downgrade back to the stable version for nowbut I would
love to get this CVS-HEAD version working because I really need the Realtime
Extensions feature!!!

Gabe

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] how to debug frame slips?

2004-12-28 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 06:10, Michael Welter wrote:
> Try 'lspci -v' and look at the latency timer for your Digium card(s). 
> You can set it higher with 'setpci -v -s xx:yy.0 LATENCY=TIMER=ff' (xx 
> is the bus number and yy is the slot).
> 

Shouldn't you decrease the latency? ie, to something lower like 16 or 8
or 0 ?? or is a higher value better??

PS, some of my devices have a latency of 0, is that normal?
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 MP [IGD4-2P]
System Controller (rev 20)
Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 32
Memory at fa00 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=32M]
Memory at f830 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=4K]
I/O ports at 1010 [disabled] [size=4]
Capabilities: [a0] AGP version 2.0

00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 MP [IGD4-2P]
AGP Bridge (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 64
Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=64

00:07.0 ISA bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] ISA (rev
05)
Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 0

00:07.1 IDE interface: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] IDE
(rev 04) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])Subsystem: Advanced
Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] IDE
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
I/O ports at f000 [size=16]



Thanks,
Adam

-- 
 -- 
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
Ph:  +61 2 8304 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: +61 2 9345 4396www.websitemanagers.com.au

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI & CPU Usage

2004-12-28 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 11:22, Derek Conniffe wrote:
> Hi everyone,  
> 
> I'm a bit unclear about how PRI voice channels use CPU usage in an asterisk
> box - it is like a codec conversion or does a PRI channel have a generic
> codec itself?

AFAIK, a PRI will use either ALAW or ULAW, depending on your telco's
default. ie, in Australia we use ALAW, in the US and possible other
places, they might use ULAW

>   I am wondering what the CPU requirements are to, for example,
> handle all 120 channels on a TE405p and then trunk all the conversations
> elsewhere over an IAX2 link.

Well, that is hard to say, assuming you are not going to transcode to
some other codec, then I *assume* it would be minimal, but... given the
trunking, there may be some additional conversion needed.

Regards,
Adam


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmailaftertimeout?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
Nevermind, it looks like "Asterisk cmd Read" is my lucky command :)

Thanks!

Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com

- Original Message - 
From: "Me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion" 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to
Vmailaftertimeout?


> I was trying this logic before, I got as far as going into the Macro,
> playing a message and then.. Well... I got lost, I am not sure how to go
> about require them to press a button. Normally I can make someone press an
> extension but from what I read about Macros in * you have to stay within
the
> "s" extension.
>
> Any idea where I can find an example of this sort of thing?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Start Your Own Internet Service!
> http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> - Original Message - 
> From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to
> Vmailaftertimeout?
>
>
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:34:28 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
> aftertimeout?
> > To: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > try the M option which will do a macro and will not connect the caller
> > unless s/he presses some button. and if no button is pressed then it
> > goes to VM. now remember to replay the message (to press the button) a
> > few times b4 going to VM otherwise they will never hear it, since *
> > considers it answered .
> > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+dial
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:29:54 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was aware of the "c" option but it's a pain for people to have to
> press
> > > the # sign plus they have to know they are suppose to do that. In
> addition,
> > > I tried to use the "A" option to play a sound to them when they answer
> > > reminding them to press pound at the end of the message but the sound
> > > doesn't play until they press pound :)
> > >
> > > So.. It appears I am still stuck with * considering the call answered
> when
> > > the Zap channels grabs it and connects the other leg of the call.
> Hopefully
> > > there is some other way to make this happen.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback though.
> > >
> > > Start Your Own Internet Service!
> > > http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > > 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:26 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
> > > aftertimeout?
> > >
> > > > Follow these:
> > > > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+zap+channels
> > > > looks like this would work:
> > > >  exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> > > >  exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1c/551212,20,rTt) ;note the c after
the
> > > > channel number
> > > >  exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > >  exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > Sorry about the HTML emails, on my laptop and forgot to change the
> > > sending
> > > > > format from the default.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > From: Me
> > > > > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:01 PM
> > > > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
after
> > > > > timeout?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box using an x100p (I
> think
> > > > > that's the model number).
> > > > >
> > > > > When I do this in my extensions.conf:
> > > > >
> > > > > exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> > > > > exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)
> > > > > exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > > > exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> > > > >
> > > > > The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and never really goes
> to
> > > the *
> > > > > voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout regardless of how
many
> > > seconds
> > > > > I set it to.
> > > > >
> > > > > I assume this has something to do with the fact that * considers
the
> > > call
> > > > > answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config work and go to the
*
> > > > > voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not answer
after
> 20
> > > > > seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy,
have
> not
> > > run
> > > > > into this yet so I am curious.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Start Your Own Internet Service!
> > > > > http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmailaftertimeout?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
I was trying this logic before, I got as far as going into the Macro,
playing a message and then.. Well... I got lost, I am not sure how to go
about require them to press a button. Normally I can make someone press an
extension but from what I read about Macros in * you have to stay within the
"s" extension.

Any idea where I can find an example of this sort of thing?

Thanks!

Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
- Original Message - 
From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to
Vmailaftertimeout?


> -- Forwarded message --
> From: C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:34:28 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
aftertimeout?
> To: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> try the M option which will do a macro and will not connect the caller
> unless s/he presses some button. and if no button is pressed then it
> goes to VM. now remember to replay the message (to press the button) a
> few times b4 going to VM otherwise they will never hear it, since *
> considers it answered .
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+dial
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:29:54 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was aware of the "c" option but it's a pain for people to have to
press
> > the # sign plus they have to know they are suppose to do that. In
addition,
> > I tried to use the "A" option to play a sound to them when they answer
> > reminding them to press pound at the end of the message but the sound
> > doesn't play until they press pound :)
> >
> > So.. It appears I am still stuck with * considering the call answered
when
> > the Zap channels grabs it and connects the other leg of the call.
Hopefully
> > there is some other way to make this happen.
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback though.
> >
> > Start Your Own Internet Service!
> > http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
> > aftertimeout?
> >
> > > Follow these:
> > > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+zap+channels
> > > looks like this would work:
> > >  exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> > >  exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1c/551212,20,rTt) ;note the c after the
> > > channel number
> > >  exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > >  exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > Sorry about the HTML emails, on my laptop and forgot to change the
> > sending
> > > > format from the default.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: Me
> > > > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:01 PM
> > > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after
> > > > timeout?
> > > >
> > > > I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box using an x100p (I
think
> > > > that's the model number).
> > > >
> > > > When I do this in my extensions.conf:
> > > >
> > > > exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> > > > exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)
> > > > exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > > exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> > > >
> > > > The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and never really goes
to
> > the *
> > > > voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout regardless of how many
> > seconds
> > > > I set it to.
> > > >
> > > > I assume this has something to do with the fact that * considers the
> > call
> > > > answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, right?
> > > >
> > > > Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config work and go to the *
> > > > voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not answer after
20
> > > > seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy, have
not
> > run
> > > > into this yet so I am curious.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Start Your Own Internet Service!
> > > > http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Use

[Asterisk-Users] external Radius Server integration with asterisk

2004-12-28 Thread Inam



Hi every body
 
I am bit new with asterisk .
i have configured it to get it working for SIP 
calls through xlite dialer from xten.
for this i used sip.cof and the user were defined 
there ,i want to put the user in db and want the raduis to authenticate the 
user through it .
can any body let me kow how can i confugure the 
external radius server with asterisk so that asterisk send radius request for 
athentication to some radius server.
thanks in advance .
 
INAMULLAH
 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Invalid Extension

2004-12-28 Thread Norman Zhang
I can dial-in and here the prompt, but whenever I select 101, I get 
invalid extension. May I ask, is this the right way of answering 
incoming calls?

[inbound-sip]
exten => 533990,1,Answer
exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => s,3,Background(mymenu)
Bearing in mind that the extensions are => extension, priority, 
something to do, you seem to be missing s,1...
I need to replace all s with 533990, so * would answer to incoming 
calls. If I use s, I get error 404. Am I missing something?

Regards,
Norman Zhang
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Callmanager 4.1 and Asterisk

2004-12-28 Thread Gonzalo Gasca Meza
You need to create a SIP trunk in CCM and in Asterisk a peer in sip.conf with the IP address of the CCM (trunk)
In the trunk configuration change the transport to UDP.
Enter the IP of Asterisk.
And create a route pattern with gateway the SIP trunk
 
In Asterisk in extensions.conf create the route to CCM phones.
I have this setup in my lab with CCM 4.02sr1 and works so fine.
If you need the sip.conf / extensions.conf and an screenshot of the route pattern and SIP trunk config just let me know!
Happy holidays!
 
Keith O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I have a similar setup.   To make it easy and get the best of both worlds, have the Linux softphones (SIP or IAX) register to Asterisk.   Keep the physical phones registered to CM.   From there setup a dialplan on both Call Manager and Asterisk to relay calls between the two systems.   For example, assign all physical phones extension 2XXX and softphones 3XXX.   Have asterisk route 2XXX calls to CM via SIP and vice versa on Call Manager.
Also, just so that you are aware you can register a SIP Linux softclient to Cisco Call Manager if you are running Version 4.1
---
Hello everybody,
im newbie in VoIP, but find this project asterisk very interesting, i tried to install and its a great sw, i really get sorprised about all of its functions, we need to use the asterisk server in conjunction with cisco callmanager.
We have a Cisco Callmanager 4.1 and the clients are softphones from cisco IPCommunicator, but all the support service of our company are linux machines, i read about callmanager uses skinny a propetary protocol and there are no softphones from linux to talk with it, so we need to install vmware to use ipcommunicator or the other solutions as i read is get the asterisk server using sip phones in the linux and windows machines and configure the call manager to talk with the asterisk server thru sip protocol, is this the real way to do that?? is there a easy way to do this?? i found this link
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Cisco+CallManager+Integration
but i need to know what things to do to transfer all the extensions from de callmanager to the asterisk sw, or if only made the changes in the sip.conf as said in the link above the callmanager gets all the control??
or if i need to declare all the extensions in the asterisk?? can anybody help me??
TIA
Edgar

___Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Mediatrix 1204 DialPlan and Delay

2004-12-28 Thread Gonzalo Gasca Meza


Hi everybody,
I have setup a Mediatrix 1204, the calls worked fine, both incoming and outgoing.
The problem here is the delay.
When I do a call to the PSTN or receive a call from the PSTN exists a delay of 4 seconds after answer or sending the call.
For OUTGOING
My Dialplan for the Mediatrix box is the following, here at Mexico we use 8 digits for local calls.
([1-9]xxx|01xx||060|0xx)
I have verified that inmediatly after I dial from my IP phone, the in-use light turns on in Mediatrix but the call is not pass until the 4 seconds timer expires.
I have tried disabling the Dial plan but it didnt help
Form Mediatrix documentation
The Timer is set to 4 seconds. It can be used to indicate that if users have not dialed a digit for 4 seconds, it is likely that they have finished dialing and the gateway can make the call. A Dial Map for this could be: 
[2-9]xxT
FOR INCOMING 
The same 4 seconds delay after the call is sent to Asterisk.
The problem here, is that despite we answer or not the call, once the call is sent to Mediatrix, the calling party hear 2 ring-back tones generated by Mediatrix, then the ringback for Asterisk
Once the call is passed to Asterisk and starts ringing, if we call from a cell phone,home or office the call is marked as answered and the call timer starts no matter if is answered or not.
Any ideas?
I have tried sending the # at the end with no success.
Thanks!
 
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
> What sort of chipset is your SATA controller interface?  Intel
> ICH6R?

Adaptec ICH5R SATA controller according to SuperMicro which makes the Mobo.
The board has an Intel® E7501 main chipset.


Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
- Original Message - 
From: "Dorn Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?


> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:12:26PM -0600, Me wrote:
> > Dorn,
> >
> >  Can you give me some details on this linux md driver you mentioned?
> >
> > Also, you say not to scrap the SATA drives, is this because you think I
can
> > use them with FC1 or because you think I should try Debian? I really
don't
> > want to venture away from Fedora at the moment for a few reasons.
> >
> It's likely you can make the SATA drives work with Fedora, I just
> can't say from personal experience.  The md driver is a software
> raid implementation.  check out mdadm (the setup command) man pages
> for more info.  I'm using three different flavors on the last
> server I built, raid0 for speed /tmp type space, raid5 for speed
> and security, and a triple-copy raid1 for really important stuff.
>
> What sort of chipset is your SATA controller interface?  Intel
> ICH6R?
>
> -Dorn
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail aftertimeout?

2004-12-28 Thread C F
-- Forwarded message --
From: C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:34:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail aftertimeout?
To: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


try the M option which will do a macro and will not connect the caller
unless s/he presses some button. and if no button is pressed then it
goes to VM. now remember to replay the message (to press the button) a
few times b4 going to VM otherwise they will never hear it, since *
considers it answered .
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+dial


On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:29:54 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was aware of the "c" option but it's a pain for people to have to press
> the # sign plus they have to know they are suppose to do that. In addition,
> I tried to use the "A" option to play a sound to them when they answer
> reminding them to press pound at the end of the message but the sound
> doesn't play until they press pound :)
>
> So.. It appears I am still stuck with * considering the call answered when
> the Zap channels grabs it and connects the other leg of the call. Hopefully
> there is some other way to make this happen.
>
> Thanks for the feedback though.
>
> Start Your Own Internet Service!
> http://www.YourOwnISP.com
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
> aftertimeout?
>
> > Follow these:
> > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+zap+channels
> > looks like this would work:
> >  exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> >  exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1c/551212,20,rTt) ;note the c after the
> > channel number
> >  exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >  exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sorry about the HTML emails, on my laptop and forgot to change the
> sending
> > > format from the default.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Me
> > > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:01 PM
> > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after
> > > timeout?
> > >
> > > I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box using an x100p (I think
> > > that's the model number).
> > >
> > > When I do this in my extensions.conf:
> > >
> > > exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> > > exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)
> > > exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> > >
> > > The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and never really goes to
> the *
> > > voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout regardless of how many
> seconds
> > > I set it to.
> > >
> > > I assume this has something to do with the fact that * considers the
> call
> > > answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, right?
> > >
> > > Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config work and go to the *
> > > voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not answer after 20
> > > seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy, have not
> run
> > > into this yet so I am curious.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Start Your Own Internet Service!
> > > http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Linux routing with T100P problems

2004-12-28 Thread Adam Fineberg
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Hey gang,
I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was
successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in
being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful
in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1.
I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
10.0.5.2   * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00
hdlc0
10.0.0.0   *   255.255.255.0   U   0 0
0eth1
10.0.3.0   *   255.255.255.0   U   0 0
0eth1
65.78.109.0 *   255.255.255.0   U   0 00
eth0
127.0.0.0 *   255.0.0.0   U   0 0
0lo
default   65.78.109.2 0.0.0.0   UG0 0
0eth0
There are 2 NICs (10.0.3.10, 65.78.109.10) and 1 T100P (10.0.5.1) on this
box.
Like I said above, from this machine I can ping everything in every attached
network and the outside world. For some reason, I cannot ping the outside
world if I am comming from the 10.0.0.* network on the diagram. From that
network, I can ping 10.0.5.1 (this box) but nothing else.
 

Do you have net.ipv4.ip_forward set to 1 in /proc?
I'm a little stumped. My iptables are completly empty. If this is waaayyy
off topic, please contact me off list. But I figured since it was related to
the T100P it might be relevant.
What can I use to find out why packets destined for the outside world (via
65.78.109.2) are not being routed?
 

Try ethereal for packet watching.
Adam
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Linux routing with T100P problems

2004-12-28 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 23:18 -0600, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> Hey gang,
>  I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was
> successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in
> being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful
> in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1.
> 
> I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table:

And your cheezy network image shows you have not exhibited good
networking knowledge. You show an internet clod in the middle of a point
to point T1.

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 10.0.5.2   * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00
> hdlc0
> 10.0.0.0   *   255.255.255.0   U   0 0
> 0eth1

Why is it you have 10.0.0.2 as a IP on the other end of a router on the
T1 line and you are routing it out of the eth1 device.

> 10.0.3.0   *   255.255.255.0   U   0 0
> 0eth1
> 65.78.109.0 *   255.255.255.0   U   0 00
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 *   255.0.0.0   U   0 0
> 0lo
> default   65.78.109.2 0.0.0.0   UG0 0
> 0eth0
> 
> There are 2 NICs (10.0.3.10, 65.78.109.10) and 1 T100P (10.0.5.1) on this
> box.


> I'm a little stumped. My iptables are completly empty. If this is waaayyy
> off topic, please contact me off list. But I figured since it was related to
> the T100P it might be relevant.

It just appears you have routing issues not anything related to the
T100P card. The T100P card is passing traffic as it should and is no
longer even a portion of your problem. You are into higher level
protocols.
-- 
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Linux routing with T100P problems

2004-12-28 Thread Gregory Junker
What can I use to find out why packets destined for the outside world (via
65.78.109.2) are not being routed?
Check with your ISP and make sure they have you set up correctly. I have 
had issues in the past with that.

Fact is, if you can ping the far end, *and packets are returned*, then 
the problem is not in your setup. If packets were not being returned I 
would say that ARP was misconfigured for your T1 interface, but since 
you are getting packets backit's not your problem. Call your ISP.

BTW, I can ping the above IP from my machine just fine, so the rest of 
the world sees your T1 as well.

Greg
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail aftertimeout?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
I was aware of the "c" option but it's a pain for people to have to press
the # sign plus they have to know they are suppose to do that. In addition,
I tried to use the "A" option to play a sound to them when they answer
reminding them to press pound at the end of the message but the sound
doesn't play until they press pound :)

So.. It appears I am still stuck with * considering the call answered when
the Zap channels grabs it and connects the other leg of the call. Hopefully
there is some other way to make this happen.

Thanks for the feedback though.

Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com

- Original Message - 
From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail
aftertimeout?


> Follow these:
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+zap+channels
> looks like this would work:
>  exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
>  exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1c/551212,20,rTt) ;note the c after the
> channel number
>  exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>  exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry about the HTML emails, on my laptop and forgot to change the
sending
> > format from the default.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Me
> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:01 PM
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after
> > timeout?
> >
> > I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box using an x100p (I think
> > that's the model number).
> >
> > When I do this in my extensions.conf:
> >
> > exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> > exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)
> > exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> >
> > The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and never really goes to
the *
> > voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout regardless of how many
seconds
> > I set it to.
> >
> > I assume this has something to do with the fact that * considers the
call
> > answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, right?
> >
> > Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config work and go to the *
> > voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not answer after 20
> > seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy, have not
run
> > into this yet so I am curious.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Start Your Own Internet Service!
> > http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] OT: Linux routing with T100P problems

2004-12-28 Thread Matthew Boehm
Hey gang,
 I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was
successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in
being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful
in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1.

I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
10.0.5.2   * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00
hdlc0
10.0.0.0   *   255.255.255.0   U   0 0
0eth1
10.0.3.0   *   255.255.255.0   U   0 0
0eth1
65.78.109.0 *   255.255.255.0   U   0 00
eth0
127.0.0.0 *   255.0.0.0   U   0 0
0lo
default   65.78.109.2 0.0.0.0   UG0 0
0eth0

There are 2 NICs (10.0.3.10, 65.78.109.10) and 1 T100P (10.0.5.1) on this
box.

Like I said above, from this machine I can ping everything in every attached
network and the outside world. For some reason, I cannot ping the outside
world if I am comming from the 10.0.0.* network on the diagram. From that
network, I can ping 10.0.5.1 (this box) but nothing else.

I'm a little stumped. My iptables are completly empty. If this is waaayyy
off topic, please contact me off list. But I figured since it was related to
the T100P it might be relevant.

What can I use to find out why packets destined for the outside world (via
65.78.109.2) are not being routed?

Thanks,
Matthew
<>___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
So are you saying that if I have one of the supported controllers, FC1 will
work out of the box with the SATA drives attached?

Also, what about FC2 or 3?

Is there a patch for any of these three builds that will support the SATA
controllers?

Thanks!

--
Start Your Own ISP!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com

- Original Message - 
From: "Sean Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?


> On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 16:12 -0600, Me wrote:
> > Dorn,
> >
> >  Can you give me some details on this linux md driver you mentioned?
> >
> > Also, you say not to scrap the SATA drives, is this because you think I
can
> > use them with FC1 or because you think I should try Debian? I really
don't
> > want to venture away from Fedora at the moment for a few reasons.
> >
>
> FC1 does support SATA drives, however it is dependant upon the sata
> controller.  The intel sata driver is supported, adaptec, 3ware 7xxx and
> 8xxx controllers are also supported.
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > - Original Message - 
> > From: "Dorn Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > 
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 4:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 02:17:47PM -0600, Me wrote:
> > > > Hello, I am trying to build up a pretty meaty Asterisk box after
doing
> > our initial testing and playing on a 1ghz system.
> > > >
> > > > Right now I have decided on a prebuilt system which I normally don't
do
> > but thought it seemed like a good deal.
> > > >
> > > > I have included the initial specs below, I will be adding another 1
GB
> > of RAM for a total of 2 GB.
> > > >
> > > > My first question is regarding the serial ATA drives... I will be
using
> > Fedora and considering FC1 seems to be the smartest of the builds when
it
> > comes to the digium hardware, will I have to scrap the SATA drives
because
> > FC1 doesn't support them or do I have bad information?
> > > >
> > > > If I need to scrap the SATA drives and let's say I didn't care about
the
> > Raid functionality, would you folks think that IDE drives would be fine
or
> > would the speed of SCSI really make much of a difference when it comes
to
> > Asterisk? If speed of drives does matter, can someone tell me why
Asterisk
> > might need fast drives vs. say 7200 IDE drives?
> > > >
> > > > Next and last question is, how many simultaneous calls do you folks
> > figure I can run on this in the following two scenarios:
> > > >
> > > > 1- All clients would be using SIP devices like SPA-2000's and all
calls
> > would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> > > > 2- All clients would be using IAX like Asterisk or an IAXy and all
calls
> > would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here are the specs:
> > > >
> > > >   a.. Dual (2) Intel Xeon 2.66GHz CPUs w/ HT Technology
> > > >   b.. 533MHz Front Side Bus
> > > >   c.. 1GB PC2100 DDR ECC Registered Memory
> > > >   d.. Two (2) 120GB SATA 7200RPM Hard Drives with 8MB Cache
> > > >   e.. 52X CD-RW Drive w/Burning Software
> > > >   f.. 3.5" 1.44MB Floppy Drive
> > > >   g.. ATI Rage XL with 8MB Onboard
> > > >   h.. Onboard RAID controller
> > > >   i.. (2) Intel Ethernet Controllers (1x1000BT Gigabit & 1x10/100)
> > > >   j.. 2U Rackmount Chassis w/ 500-Watt Power Supply
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > >
> > > You don't need to scrap the SATA drives, they are very nice.
> > > You might want to give Debian a try.
> > > Don't use the "RAID" mode on the motherboard as it's likely
> > > "fake raid", instead use linux md driver for software raid,
> > > it's smoking fast for SATA drives and on my 3.2ghz box
> > > barely scratches the CPU resyncing.
> > >
> > > -Dorn
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digiu

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan variables

2004-12-28 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Norman Zhang wrote:
Hi,
May I ask what does
exten => s,1,Answer
exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => i,1,Playback(pbx-invalid)
s, t, i stands for? It says it is someexten but I still don't get it.
   Predefined Extension Names
Asterisk uses some extension names for special purposes:
   * *i * : Invalid
   * *s * : Start
   * *h * : Hangup
   * *t * : Timeout
   * *T * :
 AbsoluteTimeout
   * *o?
 *
 : Operator
from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+extensions.conf
bye
Ronald
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime extension problem

2004-12-28 Thread Matthew Boehm
Well if you got 100% CPU usage right after you insterted the rows, it seems
more like a database issue. What did you use to determine 100% usage? Did
you use top and it said asterisk was using 100%?

-Matthw

- Original Message - 
From: "VoIP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime extension problem


> Actually I only inserted these two records to my database and got CPU 100%
> load. The AGI script didn't run because I didn't make any call.
> I am using RH9 and checkout the CVS data 12/09/04 version.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "VoIP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:22 AM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime extension problem
>
>
> > Try insert below 2 records to the extension table,
> >
> > INSERT INTO `extensions_table` VALUES (1, 'mycontext', '_1.', 1, 'AGI',
> > 'pstn.agi');
> >
> > INSERT INTO `extensions_table` VALUES (2, 'mycontext', '_2.', 1, 'AGI',
> > 'pstn.agi');
> >
> > Asterisk will make CPU 100% load and hang.
>
> Are you positive there is nothing wrong with your AGI scripts? Can you
> run the AGI scripts outside of RealTime extensions?
>
> No problems over here...
> -Matthew
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MySQL Realtime Driver

2004-12-28 Thread Matthew Boehm
There is info on the wiki.

Matthew
- Original Message - 
From: "Chris Tooley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MySQL Realtime Driver


> Is there any documentation or insight on figuring out how to get
> RealTime IAX set up?  I'm trying to do just that.  Also can do
> separate peer/user configurations or just friends?  And how do you
> configure the rest of the iax.conf information?
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:01:00 -0600, Matthew Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Yes and No. You need to realize this isn't "Asterisk and MySQL".  This
is
> > "Asterisk and RealTime using MySQL".  You can also have "Asterisk and
> > RealTime using ODBC" etc..
> >
> > It is NOT the database that supports features. It is RealTime that
supports
> > features.
> >
> > RealTime is still in DEVELOPMENT. and more apps are slowly being added
with
> > RealTime abilities.
> >
> > Currently, the only officially supported RealTime configs are
"sipfriends",
> > "iaxfriends", "voicemail" and "extensions". There are patches in
progress
> > for MeetMe, and Directory.
> >
> > Yes, you can store static *.confs into the database just like before.
> >
> > You need to be running latest CVS. If you want to use ODBC->MySQL then
you
> > don't need anything extra. If you want direct MySQL, get (from CVS)
> > asterisk-addons.
> >
> > -Matthew
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Christopher Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 8:22 AM
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] MySQL Realtime Driver
> >
> > > Can someone shed some light on this? It sounds like exactly what I am
> > > looking for. Does it handle extensions.conf or just sip/iax/voicemail?
> > (not
> > > that to say that _just_ those things would be cool)
> > >
> > > I have googled for some more information, but so far the only thing I
can
> > > find is in the bug tracker and perhaps I'm missing something, but I
don't
> > > get a full explanation.
> > >
> > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > ~c
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 app_curl compile error?

2004-12-28 Thread Michael Swan
At 03:55 PM 12/29/2004 +1300, you wrote:
Michael Swan wrote:
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anyone else run into this problem? I can chase down libidn but I
find it odd that others on the list have seemingly gotten asterisk to work
on FC3 but never complained about this particular problem...
Heh, yeah I did too.  I ended up just commenting it out of the 
asterisk/apps/Makefile.

If you don't need it...
--
Now why didn't I think of that? :-) Thanks for the advice.
Michael Swan
Neon Software, Inc.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime extension problem

2004-12-28 Thread VoIP
Actually I only inserted these two records to my database and got CPU 100%
load. The AGI script didn't run because I didn't make any call. 
I am using RH9 and checkout the CVS data 12/09/04 version. 



- Original Message - 
From: "VoIP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:22 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime extension problem


> Try insert below 2 records to the extension table,
>
> INSERT INTO `extensions_table` VALUES (1, 'mycontext', '_1.', 1, 'AGI',
> 'pstn.agi');
>
> INSERT INTO `extensions_table` VALUES (2, 'mycontext', '_2.', 1, 'AGI',
> 'pstn.agi');
>
> Asterisk will make CPU 100% load and hang.

Are you positive there is nothing wrong with your AGI scripts? Can you
run the AGI scripts outside of RealTime extensions?

No problems over here...
-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] 500 "Internal Server Error"

2004-12-28 Thread Stephen Malenshek




I am working with implementing Asterisk between four different AS5400's located in multiple sites with different PSTN gateways.  I can get two of them to work without a problem, but I am getting the following on the others when I make a SIP call to the other two sites.

Got SIP response 500 "Internal Server Error" back from 10.1.3.28
SIP/alma-1b77 is circuit-busy
Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0)

The strange thing is that one of the access servers is working fine with the exact same configs in every way.  I have moved both routers to the same IOS version which is:

IOS (tm) 5400 Software (C5400-JS-M), Version 12.2(2)XB15

I have included a copy of the dial-peers that are specified on the non-functional access server, and I have double checked the configs against the circuitassignments and they are correct.

!
dial-peer voice 63201 pots
destination-pattern 632
no digit-strip
port 1/0:0
!
dial-peer voice 63202 pots
destination-pattern 632
no digit-strip
port 1/2:0
!
dial-peer voice 63203 pots
destination-pattern 632
no digit-strip
port 1/3:0
!
dial-peer voice 63204 pots
destination-pattern 632
no digit-strip
port 1/4:0
!
dial-peer voice 63401 pots
destination-pattern 634
no digit-strip
port 1/5:0
!
dial-peer voice 63402 pots
destination-pattern 634
no digit-strip
port 1/6:0
!
dial-peer voice 99701 pots
destination-pattern 997
no digit-strip
port 1/0:0
!
dial-peer voice 99702 pots
destination-pattern 997
no digit-strip
port 1/2:0
!
dial-peer voice 99703 pots
destination-pattern 997
no digit-strip
port 1/3:0
!
dial-peer voice 99704 pots
destination-pattern 997
no digit-strip
port 1/4:0
!
dial-peer voice 43001 pots
destination-pattern 430
no digit-strip
port 1/0:0
!
dial-peer voice 43002 pots
destination-pattern 430
no digit-strip
port 1/2:0
!
dial-peer voice 43003 pots
destination-pattern 430
no digit-strip
port 1/3:0
!
dial-peer voice 43004 pots
destination-pattern 430
no digit-strip
port 1/4:0
!
dial-peer voice 67001 pots
destination-pattern 670
no digit-strip
port 1/0:0
!
dial-peer voice 67002 pots
destination-pattern 670
no digit-strip
port 1/2:0
!
dial-peer voice 67003 pots
destination-pattern 670
no digit-strip
port 1/3:0
!
dial-peer voice 67004 pots
destination-pattern 670
no digit-strip
port 1/4:0
!
sip-ua
max-forwards 15
retry invite 10
timers trying 1000
timers expires 30
sip-server ipv4:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060
no transport tcp
!

The following is the debugs I collected from the access server with the problem:

6936: 006932: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: Received:
6937: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
6938: Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.67.76.41:5060;branch=z9hG4bK72629db3
6939: From: "5462000" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as3e9b26ba
6940: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
6941: Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
6942: Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6943: CSeq: 102 INVITE
6944: User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
6945: Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:47:54 GMT
6946: Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
6947: Content-Type: application/sdp
6948: Content-Length: 179
6949:
6950: v=0
6951: o=root 9671 9671 IN IP4 65.67.76.41
6952: s=session
6953: c=IN IP4 65.67.76.41
6954: t=0 0
6955: m=audio 11980 RTP/AVP 0 3
6956: a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
6957: a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
6958: a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
6959:
6960: 006933: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: HandleUdpSocketReads :Msg enqueued for SPI with IPaddr: 65.67.76.41:5060
6961: 006934: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL:  sipSPISipIncomingCall
6962: 006935: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: 0x63CEA7B8 : State change from (STATE_NONE, SUBSTATE_NONE)  to (STATE_IDLE, SUBSTATE_NONE)
6963: 006936: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL:  act_idle_new_message
6964: 006937: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL:  Converting TimeZone CST to SIP default timezone = GMT
6965: 006938: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL:  sact_idle_new_message_invite
6966: 006939: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: CCSIP-SPI-CONTROL:  sip_stats_method
6967: 006940: Dec 29 01:48:05.075: sipSPIGetSdpBody : Parse incoming session description
6968: 006941: Dec 29 01:48:05.079:  Info: Media ip address/domain name in c line: 65.67.76.41
6969:
6970: 006942: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: non dial peer leg - using RTP Supported Codecs
6971:
6972: 006943: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Preferred Codecs supported by GW 18
6973:
6974: 006944: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Preferred Codecs supported by GW 0
6975:
6976: 006945: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Preferred Codecs supported by GW 8
6977:
6978: 006946: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Preferred Codecs supported by GW 4
6979:
6980: 006947: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Preferred Codecs supported by GW 2
6981:
6982: 006948: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Preferred Codecs supported by GW 15
6983:
6984: 006949: Dec 29 01:48:05.079: sact_idle_new_message_invite: RTP Pre

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Invalid Extension

2004-12-28 Thread Matt
Norman Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I can dial-in and here the prompt, but whenever I select 101, I get 
invalid extension. May I ask, is this the right way of answering 
incoming calls?

Regards,
Norman Zhang
[inbound-sip]
exten => 533990,1,Answer
exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => s,3,Background(mymenu)
Bearing in mind that the extensions are => extension, priority, 
something to do, you seem to be missing s,1...

--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
Daily Asterisk News:
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php for html
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php for rss
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 app_curl compile error?

2004-12-28 Thread Matt
Michael Swan wrote:
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anyone else run into this problem? I can chase down libidn but I
find it odd that others on the list have seemingly gotten asterisk to work
on FC3 but never complained about this particular problem...
Heh, yeah I did too.  I ended up just commenting it out of the 
asterisk/apps/Makefile.

If you don't need it...
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
Daily Asterisk News:
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php for html
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php for rss
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Invalid Extension

2004-12-28 Thread Norman Zhang
I can dial-in and here the prompt, but whenever I select 101, I get 
invalid extension. May I ask, is this the right way of answering 
incoming calls?
I had to change all occurance of s to 533990 in order for this to work. 
533990 is my FWD #. May I ask how can I genearlize this using s?

Regards,
Norman Zhang
[inbound-sip]
exten => 533990,1,Answer
exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => s,3,Background(mymenu)
exten => t,1,Goto(s,2)
exten => i,1,Playback(pbx-invalid)
exten => i,2,Goto(s,2)
exten => 101,1,Goto(local,101,1)
exten => 138,1,Goto(local,138,1)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 app_curl compile error?

2004-12-28 Thread Michael Swan
Hi,
I'm making the latest CVS asterisk source on a newly installed Fedora
Core 3 distribution. However, when the makefile for asterisk/apps runs,
it generates an error when trying to link app_curl.so complaining about
not finding -lidn.
Has anyone else run into this problem? I can chase down libidn but I
find it odd that others on the list have seemingly gotten asterisk to work
on FC3 but never complained about this particular problem...
Michael Swan
Neon Software, Inc.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sending e-mail from dialplan

2004-12-28 Thread Adam Menne








I would like help with a “dial plan” that will do
the following: I feel pretty good about each of the elements except; how to
e-mail the recorded file to an e-mail address.

 

Allow a caller to call into the system:

 


 Answer
 play a short pre defined
 greeting
 Allow caller to enter “PIN”
 during the Item #2 greeting
 
  If the caller entered THE
  valid pin (1 system wide pre-defined pin) the caller she experience:
 


  
i. 
Be prompted to record a greeting
(record action mandatory) defined as the “message of the day”


ii. 
Listen to recorded greeting for approval,
option to re-record or option to continue.

   
iii. 
After continuing, the caller should
have an option to send message to the E-mail list as a .WAV attachment.

1.   The Email
list will be a single address to a mail server for distribution to member
lists.

   
iv. 
Thank the caller 

 
v. 
Disconnect


 
  If the caller does not enter a
  PIN in 15sec the caller is played the Current time and Date, a recorded disclaimer,
  and “the Message of the day”, then is disconnected.
 


 

 

Also, while you’re on the topic; what is the feasibility
of allowing someone to hit an “web” page and type in the message of
the day and have festival read it?  If that may work, I would send the
e-mail from the web page action and asterisk would not have to handle it….
But for simplicity and end user ease over the phone would be better I think?

 

 

Thanks for all of your help,

AZM

The Labs






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Invalid Extension

2004-12-28 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,
I can dial-in and here the prompt, but whenever I select 101, I get 
invalid extension. May I ask, is this the right way of answering 
incoming calls?

Regards,
Norman Zhang
[inbound-sip]
exten => 533990,1,Answer
exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => s,3,Background(mymenu)
exten => t,1,Goto(s,2)
exten => i,1,Playback(pbx-invalid)
exten => i,2,Goto(s,2)
exten => 101,1,Goto(local,101,1)
exten => 138,1,Goto(local,138,1)
;exten => 533990,1,Goto(local,101,1)
; Internal Extensions
[local]
exten => 101,1,Dial(${MAINPHONE},20,Tt)
exten => 101,2,Voicemail(u101)
exten => 101,3,Hangup
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan variables

2004-12-28 Thread Steve Totaro
1/3 down the page are your answers.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+extensions.conf


- Original Message - 
From: "Norman Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:20 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Dialplan variables


> Hi,
>
> May I ask what does
>
> exten => s,1,Answer
> exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
>
> exten => i,1,Playback(pbx-invalid)
>
> s, t, i stands for? It says it is someexten but I still don't get it.
>
> Regards,
> Norman Zhang
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTCC Expiration

2004-12-28 Thread Darren Wiebe
I told somebody I would get it done over Christmas.  I'm still planning 
on getting the expiration date stuff up and running before Jan 1st 
but...  If a few people would like to try out my last patches for astcc 
found at http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002796 I would 
bump it up a little more on my priority list.  Those patches have been 
sitting there since 11-05-04  If anybody is using them I would 
appreciate if you would provide feedback in the bugreport.

Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you set the expiration date in ASTCC?  DO you have to customize the CGI
script?  A maintenance fee field would be nice as well.  Anybody?
--
Kelly D Griffin
Network Engineer
Tantella Wireless
http://tantella.com
479.273.9992 Voice
479.464.8998 Fax

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as possiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

2004-12-28 Thread Erik Espinoza
Check this out:
http://www.softwink.com/papers/Installation_Securing_VoIP_With_Linux/

There's an article on how to use openvpn to encrypt data between two
Asterisk Boxes.

Should help, looks easy enough.

Erik

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:57:11 -0800, Christopher Dobbs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This problem is being solved.
> See
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-November/073666.html
> I am currently in pre-testing phase of development.
> 
> Features include:
>Optional Secondary Compression
>Selectable Encryption Level, from 32bit to 1024bit
>Uses UDP
>Voice and Data over same Link
>Trunking
>ADSI Support
> 
> --
> Christopher Dobbs
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Dorn Hetzel
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:12:26PM -0600, Me wrote:
> Dorn,
> 
>  Can you give me some details on this linux md driver you mentioned?
> 
> Also, you say not to scrap the SATA drives, is this because you think I can
> use them with FC1 or because you think I should try Debian? I really don't
> want to venture away from Fedora at the moment for a few reasons.
>
It's likely you can make the SATA drives work with Fedora, I just
can't say from personal experience.  The md driver is a software
raid implementation.  check out mdadm (the setup command) man pages
for more info.  I'm using three different flavors on the last
server I built, raid0 for speed /tmp type space, raid5 for speed
and security, and a triple-copy raid1 for really important stuff.

What sort of chipset is your SATA controller interface?  Intel
ICH6R? 

-Dorn
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as possiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

2004-12-28 Thread Christopher Dobbs
This problem is being solved.
See 
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-November/073666.html
I am currently in pre-testing phase of development.

Features include:
  Optional Secondary Compression
  Selectable Encryption Level, from 32bit to 1024bit
  Uses UDP
  Voice and Data over same Link
  Trunking
  ADSI Support
--
Christopher Dobbs
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Meetme scalable to 300 people?

2004-12-28 Thread Geoff Nordli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> scribbled on :

> What is the difference between meetme and app_conference?  I
> am looking to
> conference a mere 10 people.  Just getting into some testing
> here.  I have
> ordered a $229 dell (on sale now) 2.5ghz celery/512mb
> ram/80gb hd/cdrom/etc.
> for a server and was thinking about ordering three PAP2-NA's
> for testing.
> Is there a better adapter for the price ?
> 
> --
> Patrick Campbell
> OurVacationStore.com
> Website Administrator
> Tel. 602.896.4729
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Geoff Nordli
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:18 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Meetme scalable to 300 people?
> 
> Hi everyone.
> 
> I am looking at providing a conference for up to 300 people and was
> wondering if anyone has scaled meetme to 300 people.
> 
> Here are some points:
> 
> 1)  I am using an IAX2 gateway hosted on a VOIP service provider.
> 2)  The machine is hosted at the providers site so one has to
> assume that
> bandwidth is not going to be an issue.
> 3)  Everything is coming in as ULAW so we won't need to do
> any transcoding.
> 4)  I am using an X100P for timing.
> 5)  The only thing that this machine will be used for is conferencing.
> 
> I haven't bought the machine yet so I would be interested
> what people used
> for hardware as well.
> 
>> From what I have seen in the archives Jeremy scaled to 185 people
>> with a
> Dual Xeon, but I don't know how it was configured or how much
> headroom was left on it.
> 
> I am aware of app_conference but I would like to do this with meetme.
> 
> Have a great day!
> 
> Geoff
> 
> --

Hi Patrick.

I haven't used the PAP-NA's yet, but they are supposedly a clone of the
Sipura's which are supposed to be OK.  Depending on the # of FXS ports you
are going to scale out to you can't beat the cost per port of a used channel
bank and a T100P card.

App_conference is here:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+app_conference

It is designed to scale better than meetme.  It looks like the primary
difference is it only does the transcoding once per each codec, and supports
silence detection.

Geoff 




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as po ssiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

2004-12-28 Thread Patrick Campbell
SSH tunnel is the way to go.   Here is a little tid bit about setting up SSH
keys, a simple keep alive script, and creating the SSH tunnel I use to
tunnel my SMTP traffic to a reliable SMTP server since my ISP blocks all
traffic incoming/outgoing on port 25.

http://xj.cdevco.net/comp/smtptunnel/

You could use the same exact thing with an SSH tunnel.  In fact, we've done
VoIP over SSH using a Linux NAT box.  The SIP adapter connects locally to a
box which SSHes to the SIP server where the unencrypted connection is made
locally.  So from the EU to the server is all encrypted.  

-- 
Patrick Campbell
OurVacationStore.com
Website Administrator
Tel. 602.896.4729
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rustin Bergren
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 4:54 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as
possiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

Couldn't you just tunnel the involved ports over SSH?  As far as bandwidth
is concerned you could enable compression and may even end up with a smaller
data stream.  You could generate both keys before hand and very simply do
this on a *nix box.  This would probably require both peers to have an
adequate speed cpu, enough to avoid any delay added by the encrypting
subsequently causing jitter. 
Is this flawed because RTP streams are on unpredictable ports?  I think only
signaling (SIP/IAX) uses 5060 and RTP streams take place on random ports.

Rustin Bergren

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Rozman
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2004 9:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as
possiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

Hi,

I plan to connect to remote Asterisk that will terminate calls to ISDN
primary channel. I'd certainly like to secure this type of service, so would
kindly ask for any advice on how to secure this authentication as much as
reasonably possible.

Since there is long IP route I guess VPN will take too much additional
bandwidth...

Regards,

Robert.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] SuperValetParkCall Application Unableto Re-ParkCall

2004-12-28 Thread Kevin
The thread discussed being unable to re-park a call with
app_supervaletparking

-Original Message-
From: Paul Zimm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SuperValetParkCall Application Unableto
Re-ParkCall

Just in case you didn't know, app_valetparking does have the ability to 
park to a
specific park number. It doesn't have the VDial stuff in 
app_supervaletparking.
Here is how I use valet parking:

exten => _5XX,1,Playback(beep)
exten => _5XX,2,ValetUnParkCall(filo|8${EXTEN:1})
exten =>
_6XX,1,ValetParkCall(auto|8${EXTEN:1:2}|60|6${EXTEN:1:2}|2|pbx_ext)


>Thanks, for the feedback.  It would be nice if the Valetpark
application
>didn't have that limitation.  The park to a specific park number is a
>nice feature.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Zimm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 11:40 AM
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SuperValetParkCall Application Unable to
>Re-ParkCall
>
>Kevin wrote:
>
>  
>
>>After retrieving a SuperValetParkCall using the SuperValetUnparkCall
>>command, I am unable to re- SuperValetParkCall the call again.  Can
>>anyone confirm if this is a bug or my configs may be incorrect.  
>>
>>Configs:
>>
>>
>>exten =>
>>3,1,SuperValetParkcall(${EXTEN:1}|mylot|500|${EXTEN:1}|1|local)
>>exten => _3,2,Hangup
>>exten => _*3,1,SuperValetUnParkCall(${EXTEN:2}|mylot)
>>exten => _*3,2,Hangup
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>This is not a bug. I experienced the same problem, and took a peek at 
>the code.
>Apparently app_supervaletparking uses it's own channel bridge function,

>which
>is very basic and doesn't process the # transfer command.
>
>I need the ability to transfer a call after a SuperValetUnparkCall so I
>went back to using app_valetparking. I wasn't using the "new" features
>in
>app_supervaletparking, just the park and unpark functions.
>
>Marv Horst
>
>  
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.5 - Release Date: 12/26/2004
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Meetme scalable to 300 people?

2004-12-28 Thread Patrick Campbell
What is the difference between meetme and app_conference?  I am looking to
conference a mere 10 people.  Just getting into some testing here.  I have
ordered a $229 dell (on sale now) 2.5ghz celery/512mb ram/80gb hd/cdrom/etc.
for a server and was thinking about ordering three PAP2-NA's for testing.
Is there a better adapter for the price ? 

-- 
Patrick Campbell
OurVacationStore.com
Website Administrator
Tel. 602.896.4729
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Nordli
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:18 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Meetme scalable to 300 people?

Hi everyone.

I am looking at providing a conference for up to 300 people and was
wondering if anyone has scaled meetme to 300 people.

Here are some points:

1)  I am using an IAX2 gateway hosted on a VOIP service provider.  
2)  The machine is hosted at the providers site so one has to assume that
bandwidth is not going to be an issue.
3)  Everything is coming in as ULAW so we won't need to do any transcoding.
4)  I am using an X100P for timing.
5)  The only thing that this machine will be used for is conferencing.

I haven't bought the machine yet so I would be interested what people used
for hardware as well.

>From what I have seen in the archives Jeremy scaled to 185 people with 
>a
Dual Xeon, but I don't know how it was configured or how much headroom was
left on it. 

I am aware of app_conference but I would like to do this with meetme. 

Have a great day!

Geoff

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after timeout?

2004-12-28 Thread C F
Follow these:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+zap+channels
looks like this would work:
 exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
 exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1c/551212,20,rTt) ;note the c after the
channel number
 exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1


On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about the HTML emails, on my laptop and forgot to change the sending
> format from the default.
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Me
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:01 PM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after
> timeout?
> 
> I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box using an x100p (I think
> that's the model number).
> 
> When I do this in my extensions.conf:
> 
> exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
> exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)
> exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1
> 
> The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and never really goes to the *
> voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout regardless of how many seconds
> I set it to.
> 
> I assume this has something to do with the fact that * considers the call
> answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, right?
> 
> Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config work and go to the *
> voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not answer after 20
> seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy, have not run
> into this yet so I am curious.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Start Your Own Internet Service!
> http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> 
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] PRI & CPU Usage

2004-12-28 Thread Derek Conniffe
Hi everyone,  

I'm a bit unclear about how PRI voice channels use CPU usage in an asterisk
box - it is like a codec conversion or does a PRI channel have a generic
codec itself?  I am wondering what the CPU requirements are to, for example,
handle all 120 channels on a TE405p and then trunk all the conversations
elsewhere over an IAX2 link.

Thanks for any advice,

Derek Conniffe

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09/12/2004
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Dialplan variables

2004-12-28 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,
May I ask what does
exten => s,1,Answer
exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => i,1,Playback(pbx-invalid)
s, t, i stands for? It says it is someexten but I still don't get it.
Regards,
Norman Zhang
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Meetme scalable to 300 people?

2004-12-28 Thread Geoff Nordli
Hi everyone.

I am looking at providing a conference for up to 300 people and was
wondering if anyone has scaled meetme to 300 people.

Here are some points:

1)  I am using an IAX2 gateway hosted on a VOIP service provider.  
2)  The machine is hosted at the providers site so one has to assume that
bandwidth is not going to be an issue.
3)  Everything is coming in as ULAW so we won't need to do any transcoding.
4)  I am using an X100P for timing.
5)  The only thing that this machine will be used for is conferencing.

I haven't bought the machine yet so I would be interested what people used
for hardware as well.

>From what I have seen in the archives Jeremy scaled to 185 people with a
Dual Xeon, but I don't know how it was configured or how much headroom was
left on it. 

I am aware of app_conference but I would like to do this with meetme. 

Have a great day!

Geoff

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 12/28/2004
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Wildcard remote looping

2004-12-28 Thread Henry Devito
We usually put an Adtran CSU ACE inline with the asterisk box and the Voice
T1 that way if the LEC wants to loop a CSU they can.  An Adtran CSU ACE just
passes the traffic as it receives it, there is no setup involved.

Henry Devito
Telephone Connection, Inc
Network Design / Implementation
Phone: 402.330.7510
Fax:402.330.8586
 
Toshiba CTX/DK/Stratagy Certified
Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert (CCIE) Voice ( VoIP)
Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert (CCIE) Routing and Switching
MCSE Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer
RHCE Red Hat Certified Engineer

   

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Pobanz
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:27 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Wildcard remote looping
> 
> Mark Farver wrote:
> 
> > Is there something special that needs to be done to allow a T100P/T400
> > to respond to a remote loop request?
> >
> 
> For a T1 the phone company would expect to see their Network Interface
> Unit (NIU) which can be looped with a special repeating code. Using a
> different repeating code they would expect to be able to loop up a
> Circuit Service Unit (CSU). The NIU belongs to the phone company. The
> NIU would belong to the customer.
> 
> A CSU is not needed for voice TDM services and so does not usually exist.
> 
> I do not believe the Digium T1 cards have built in the CSU functionality
> and so the phone company will not be able to loop it. When I have talked
> with the phone company I just tell them that there is not a CSU.
> 
> If CSU functionality is required, it would require a change to the driver.
> 
> Don Pobanz
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Chris Tooley
It would be nice if the table schema and basic usage would sketched
out.  I'm happy to add it to the wiki, I just have to get a usable
configuration to do so.

I have the following as my create table statement.  I appreciate it if
it was corrected.

CREATE TABLE iax (
  uniqueid int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
  name varchar(30) NOT NULL default '',
  accountcode varchar(30) default NULL,
  amaflags char(1) default NULL,
  callgroup varchar(30) default NULL,
  callerid varchar(50) default NULL,
  canreinvite char(1) default NULL,
  context varchar(30) default NULL,
  defaultip varchar(15) default NULL,
  dtmfmode varchar(7) default NULL,
  fromuser varchar(50) default NULL,
  fromdomain varchar(31) default NULL,
  host varchar(31) NOT NULL default '',
  incominglimit char(2) default NULL,
  outgoinglimit char(2) default NULL,
  insecure char(1) default NULL,
  language char(2) default NULL,
  mailbox varchar(50) default NULL,
  md5secret varchar(32) default NULL,
  nat varchar(5) default NULL,
  auth varchar(5) default NULL,
  inkeys varchar(64) default NULL,
  permit varchar(95) default NULL,
  deny varchar(95) default NULL,
  pickupgroup varchar(10) default NULL,
  port varchar(5) NOT NULL default '',
  qualify varchar(4) default NULL,
  notransfer varchar(4) default NULL,
  restrictcid char(1) default NULL,
  rtptimeout char(3) default NULL,
  rtpholdtimeout char(3) default NULL,
  secret varchar(30) default NULL,
  type varchar(6) NOT NULL default '',
  username varchar(30) NOT NULL default '',
  allow varchar(100) default NULL,
  disallow varchar(100) default NULL,
  regseconds int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
  ipaddr varchar(15) NOT NULL default '',
  PRIMARY KEY  (uniqueid),
  UNIQUE KEY name (name),
  KEY name_2 (name)
) TYPE=MyISAM;

Where do the rest of the iax settings go (do we still use iax.conf?)
and do I have to set everyone up as a friend or can I use users and
peers as well?


Chris Tooley

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:45:20 -0800, Gabriel Afana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nick Bachmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 3:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'
> 
> > Gabriel Afana wrote:
> >
> > >Ahhh, and I've read every message telling everybody they dont have the
> > >lastest version...thats why I went to asterisk.org and downloaded the
> > >highest-number version I could find in the FTP Okdownloaded
> latest
> > >CVS but now asterisk wont compile.  I had it working before.
> > >
> > >during "make", it says:
> > >
> > >chan_zap.c:61:2: #error "You need newer libpri"
> > >
> > This error means that you need a newer libpri.
> >
> > That means you need to:
> >
> > # cvs checkout zaptel libpri asterisk
> >
> > and then
> >
> > # cd zaptel
> > # make clean; make install
> > # cd ../libpri
> > # make clean; make install
> > # cd ../asterisk
> > # make clean; make install
> >
> > Nick
> 
> 
> I did that...I can't tell you how many times!  but for some reason I just
> did it again and it worked.  I think it was because I was doing:
> 
> make clean
> make
> make instsall
> 
> instead of just:
> 
> make clean
> make install
> 
> Oh well...testing Realtime extensions now...I hope it works! :-)
> 
> Gabe
> 
> 
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as possiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

2004-12-28 Thread Rustin Bergren
Couldn't you just tunnel the involved ports over SSH?  As far as bandwidth
is concerned you could enable compression and may even end up with a smaller
data stream.  You could generate both keys before hand and very simply do
this on a *nix box.  This would probably require both peers to have an
adequate speed cpu, enough to avoid any delay added by the encrypting
subsequently causing jitter. 
Is this flawed because RTP streams are on unpredictable ports?  I think only
signaling (SIP/IAX) uses 5060 and RTP streams take place on random ports.

Rustin Bergren

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Rozman
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2004 9:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to connect two Asterisks as secure as
possiblewithout too much additional bandwidth ?

Hi,

I plan to connect to remote Asterisk that will terminate calls to ISDN
primary channel. I'd certainly like to secure this type of service, so would
kindly ask for any advice on how to secure this authentication as much as
reasonably possible.

Since there is long IP route I guess VPN will take too much additional
bandwidth...

Regards,

Robert.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Gabriel Afana

- Original Message -
From: "Nick Bachmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'


> Gabriel Afana wrote:
>
> >Ahhh, and I've read every message telling everybody they dont have the
> >lastest version...thats why I went to asterisk.org and downloaded the
> >highest-number version I could find in the FTP Okdownloaded
latest
> >CVS but now asterisk wont compile.  I had it working before.
> >
> >during "make", it says:
> >
> >chan_zap.c:61:2: #error "You need newer libpri"
> >
> This error means that you need a newer libpri.
>
> That means you need to:
>
> # cvs checkout zaptel libpri asterisk
>
> and then
>
> # cd zaptel
> # make clean; make install
> # cd ../libpri
> # make clean; make install
> # cd ../asterisk
> # make clean; make install
>
> Nick


I did that...I can't tell you how many times!  but for some reason I just
did it again and it worked.  I think it was because I was doing:

make clean
make
make instsall

instead of just:

make clean
make install

Oh well...testing Realtime extensions now...I hope it works! :-)

Gabe







> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ASTCC Expiration

2004-12-28 Thread kelly . griffin
How do you set the expiration date in ASTCC?  DO you have to customize the CGI
script?  A maintenance fee field would be nice as well.  Anybody?

--
Kelly D Griffin
Network Engineer
Tantella Wireless
http://tantella.com
479.273.9992 Voice
479.464.8998 Fax




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MySQL Realtime Driver

2004-12-28 Thread Chris Tooley
Is there any documentation or insight on figuring out how to get
RealTime IAX set up?  I'm trying to do just that.  Also can do
separate peer/user configurations or just friends?  And how do you
configure the rest of the iax.conf information?


On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:01:00 -0600, Matthew Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes and No. You need to realize this isn't "Asterisk and MySQL".  This is
> "Asterisk and RealTime using MySQL".  You can also have "Asterisk and
> RealTime using ODBC" etc..
> 
> It is NOT the database that supports features. It is RealTime that supports
> features.
> 
> RealTime is still in DEVELOPMENT. and more apps are slowly being added with
> RealTime abilities.
> 
> Currently, the only officially supported RealTime configs are "sipfriends",
> "iaxfriends", "voicemail" and "extensions". There are patches in progress
> for MeetMe, and Directory.
> 
> Yes, you can store static *.confs into the database just like before.
> 
> You need to be running latest CVS. If you want to use ODBC->MySQL then you
> don't need anything extra. If you want direct MySQL, get (from CVS)
> asterisk-addons.
> 
> -Matthew
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 8:22 AM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] MySQL Realtime Driver
> 
> > Can someone shed some light on this? It sounds like exactly what I am
> > looking for. Does it handle extensions.conf or just sip/iax/voicemail?
> (not
> > that to say that _just_ those things would be cool)
> >
> > I have googled for some more information, but so far the only thing I can
> > find is in the bug tracker and perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't
> > get a full explanation.
> >
> > Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > ~c
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Nick Bachmann
Gabriel Afana wrote:
Ahhh, and I've read every message telling everybody they dont have the
lastest version...thats why I went to asterisk.org and downloaded the
highest-number version I could find in the FTP Okdownloaded latest
CVS but now asterisk wont compile.  I had it working before.
during "make", it says:
chan_zap.c:61:2: #error "You need newer libpri"
This error means that you need a newer libpri.
That means you need to:
# cvs checkout zaptel libpri asterisk 

and then
# cd zaptel
# make clean; make install
# cd ../libpri
# make clean; make install
# cd ../asterisk
# make clean; make install
Nick
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Wildcard remote looping

2004-12-28 Thread Don Pobanz
Mark Farver wrote:
Is there something special that needs to be done to allow a T100P/T400
to respond to a remote loop request?
For a T1 the phone company would expect to see their Network Interface 
Unit (NIU) which can be looped with a special repeating code. Using a 
different repeating code they would expect to be able to loop up a 
Circuit Service Unit (CSU). The NIU belongs to the phone company. The 
NIU would belong to the customer.

A CSU is not needed for voice TDM services and so does not usually exist.
I do not believe the Digium T1 cards have built in the CSU functionality 
and so the phone company will not be able to loop it. When I have talked 
with the phone company I just tell them that there is not a CSU.

If CSU functionality is required, it would require a change to the driver.
Don Pobanz
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Gabriel Afana
> > > > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): relocation
> > > > R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
> > > > with -fPIC
> > > > /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
> > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > >
> > > Never seen that before. What OS are you using? What version of
> MySQL?
> >
> > I am running Redhat ES Version 3 Update 4 on AMD64 platform
> >
> > I just installed MySQL 4.1.8 (do any DBIs or anything needs to be
> > installed?)
>
> Are you able to use mysql client to connect to anything? This seems
more
> like a mysql issue than res_config_mysql issue. I just compiled 4.1.8a and
> everything works fine here.



I am able to connect to MySQL and everything with no problem.




> > Connected to Asterisk 1.0.3 currently running on g0 (pid = 22313)
>
> This is probably the 4th or 5th time I've answered this in the past 2
> days. RealTime is NOT in stable. RealTime is in CVS! Get CVS! You do not
> have the most recent version of asterisk. Therefore, RealTime is not
> present.





Ahhh, and I've read every message telling everybody they dont have the
lastest version...thats why I went to asterisk.org and downloaded the
highest-number version I could find in the FTP Okdownloaded latest
CVS but now asterisk wont compile.  I had it working before.

during "make", it says:

chan_zap.c:61:2: #error "You need newer libpri"
chan_zap.c: In function `zt_call':
chan_zap.c:1806: warning: implicit declaration of function
`pri_sr_set_redirecting'
chan_zap.c: In function `pri_dchannel':
chan_zap.c:7788: structure has no member named `redirectingreason'
chan_zap.c:7790: structure has no member named `redirectingreason'
chan_zap.c: In function `setup_zap':
chan_zap.c:9657: `PRI_SWITCH_QSIG' undeclared (first use in this function)
chan_zap.c:9657: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
chan_zap.c:9657: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [chan_zap.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/channels'
make: *** [subdirs] Error 1

I have downloaded latest from CVS and installed it with no problems but its
not working (never had this problem before).  I directly downloaded it and
installed (version 1.0.3) and tried other versions as well...nothing works.

Gabe







> -Matthew
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Intercom System with Asterisk and Cisco 7960

2004-12-28 Thread Christopher Tuska (HOME)



OK, I got my Cisco 7960's to auto-answer on the 
second line but I can't get the Asterisk to call all the lines at one 
time.  I have 4 phones I would like all of then to answer when I dial 
x300.
 
Any help would be great Thanks
 
Tuska
 
extensions.conf
[conference]exten => 
300,1,AGI(callall)    exten => 300,2,MeetMe(300,dtqp) ; 
press # to exit the conference    
exten => 300,3,MeetMeAdmin(300,K) ; kick all users 
out    exten => 
300,4,Hangup    exten => 
h,1,Hangup;[add-to-conference]exten => 
start,1,MeetMe(300,dmqp)    exten => 
h,1,Hangup
/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/301-conf (and one for each 
extension)
Channel: SIP/301 Context: add-to-conference 
Extension: start Priority: 1 CallerID: Office Pager 
<300>
 
/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/callall
#!/bin/sh cp /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/*conf 
/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Sean Cook
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 16:12 -0600, Me wrote:
> Dorn,
> 
>  Can you give me some details on this linux md driver you mentioned?
> 
> Also, you say not to scrap the SATA drives, is this because you think I can
> use them with FC1 or because you think I should try Debian? I really don't
> want to venture away from Fedora at the moment for a few reasons.
> 

FC1 does support SATA drives, however it is dependant upon the sata
controller.  The intel sata driver is supported, adaptec, 3ware 7xxx and
8xxx controllers are also supported. 

> Thanks!
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dorn Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 02:17:47PM -0600, Me wrote:
> > > Hello, I am trying to build up a pretty meaty Asterisk box after doing
> our initial testing and playing on a 1ghz system.
> > >
> > > Right now I have decided on a prebuilt system which I normally don't do
> but thought it seemed like a good deal.
> > >
> > > I have included the initial specs below, I will be adding another 1 GB
> of RAM for a total of 2 GB.
> > >
> > > My first question is regarding the serial ATA drives... I will be using
> Fedora and considering FC1 seems to be the smartest of the builds when it
> comes to the digium hardware, will I have to scrap the SATA drives because
> FC1 doesn't support them or do I have bad information?
> > >
> > > If I need to scrap the SATA drives and let's say I didn't care about the
> Raid functionality, would you folks think that IDE drives would be fine or
> would the speed of SCSI really make much of a difference when it comes to
> Asterisk? If speed of drives does matter, can someone tell me why Asterisk
> might need fast drives vs. say 7200 IDE drives?
> > >
> > > Next and last question is, how many simultaneous calls do you folks
> figure I can run on this in the following two scenarios:
> > >
> > > 1- All clients would be using SIP devices like SPA-2000's and all calls
> would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> > > 2- All clients would be using IAX like Asterisk or an IAXy and all calls
> would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here are the specs:
> > >
> > >   a.. Dual (2) Intel Xeon 2.66GHz CPUs w/ HT Technology
> > >   b.. 533MHz Front Side Bus
> > >   c.. 1GB PC2100 DDR ECC Registered Memory
> > >   d.. Two (2) 120GB SATA 7200RPM Hard Drives with 8MB Cache
> > >   e.. 52X CD-RW Drive w/Burning Software
> > >   f.. 3.5" 1.44MB Floppy Drive
> > >   g.. ATI Rage XL with 8MB Onboard
> > >   h.. Onboard RAID controller
> > >   i.. (2) Intel Ethernet Controllers (1x1000BT Gigabit & 1x10/100)
> > >   j.. 2U Rackmount Chassis w/ 500-Watt Power Supply
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
> > You don't need to scrap the SATA drives, they are very nice.
> > You might want to give Debian a try.
> > Don't use the "RAID" mode on the motherboard as it's likely
> > "fake raid", instead use linux md driver for software raid,
> > it's smoking fast for SATA drives and on my 3.2ghz box
> > barely scratches the CPU resyncing.
> >
> > -Dorn
> >
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Keith Stevenson
Paul Rodan wrote:
No clue. I know 150 worked though. I now have dhcp-option 66 and 150 defined
as the IP and the phone took it, so whichever the phone wants it'll be
there.
 

Cisco IP phones prefer option 150 and will use it when it is available.  
If option 150 is not provided, they fall back to option 66.

Regards,
--Keith Stevenson--
begin:vcard
fn:Keith Stevenson
n:Stevenson;Keith
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Paul Rodan
No clue. I know 150 worked though. I now have dhcp-option 66 and 150 defined
as the IP and the phone took it, so whichever the phone wants it'll be
there.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:18 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP,the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco
79xx phones

> > 
> > But the Cisco phones are ignoring it. According to RFC2132, DHCP 
> > Option/Code 66 is the TFTP server name. But the Cisco 79xx phones Ive 
> > tested are ignoring this.

Code 66 works just fine for me on a Win32 dhcp server and multiple
7960's. Never misses.

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Rich Adamson
> > 
> > But the Cisco phones are ignoring it. According to RFC2132, DHCP 
> > Option/Code 66 is the TFTP server name. But the Cisco 79xx phones I’ve 
> > tested are ignoring this.

Code 66 works just fine for me on a Win32 dhcp server and multiple
7960's. Never misses.

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Matthew Boehm
> > > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): relocation
> > > R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
> > > with -fPIC
> > > /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > Never seen that before. What OS are you using? What version of
MySQL?
>
> I am running Redhat ES Version 3 Update 4 on AMD64 platform
>
> I just installed MySQL 4.1.8 (do any DBIs or anything needs to be
> installed?)

Are you able to use mysql client to connect to anything? This seems more
like a mysql issue than res_config_mysql issue. I just compiled 4.1.8a and
everything works fine here.

> Connected to Asterisk 1.0.3 currently running on g0 (pid = 22313)

This is probably the 4th or 5th time I've answered this in the past 2
days. RealTime is NOT in stable. RealTime is in CVS! Get CVS! You do not
have the most recent version of asterisk. Therefore, RealTime is not
present.

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
Dorn,

 Can you give me some details on this linux md driver you mentioned?

Also, you say not to scrap the SATA drives, is this because you think I can
use them with FC1 or because you think I should try Debian? I really don't
want to venture away from Fedora at the moment for a few reasons.

Thanks!


- Original Message - 
From: "Dorn Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?


> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 02:17:47PM -0600, Me wrote:
> > Hello, I am trying to build up a pretty meaty Asterisk box after doing
our initial testing and playing on a 1ghz system.
> >
> > Right now I have decided on a prebuilt system which I normally don't do
but thought it seemed like a good deal.
> >
> > I have included the initial specs below, I will be adding another 1 GB
of RAM for a total of 2 GB.
> >
> > My first question is regarding the serial ATA drives... I will be using
Fedora and considering FC1 seems to be the smartest of the builds when it
comes to the digium hardware, will I have to scrap the SATA drives because
FC1 doesn't support them or do I have bad information?
> >
> > If I need to scrap the SATA drives and let's say I didn't care about the
Raid functionality, would you folks think that IDE drives would be fine or
would the speed of SCSI really make much of a difference when it comes to
Asterisk? If speed of drives does matter, can someone tell me why Asterisk
might need fast drives vs. say 7200 IDE drives?
> >
> > Next and last question is, how many simultaneous calls do you folks
figure I can run on this in the following two scenarios:
> >
> > 1- All clients would be using SIP devices like SPA-2000's and all calls
would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> > 2- All clients would be using IAX like Asterisk or an IAXy and all calls
would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> >
> >
> > Here are the specs:
> >
> >   a.. Dual (2) Intel Xeon 2.66GHz CPUs w/ HT Technology
> >   b.. 533MHz Front Side Bus
> >   c.. 1GB PC2100 DDR ECC Registered Memory
> >   d.. Two (2) 120GB SATA 7200RPM Hard Drives with 8MB Cache
> >   e.. 52X CD-RW Drive w/Burning Software
> >   f.. 3.5" 1.44MB Floppy Drive
> >   g.. ATI Rage XL with 8MB Onboard
> >   h.. Onboard RAID controller
> >   i.. (2) Intel Ethernet Controllers (1x1000BT Gigabit & 1x10/100)
> >   j.. 2U Rackmount Chassis w/ 500-Watt Power Supply
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> You don't need to scrap the SATA drives, they are very nice.
> You might want to give Debian a try.
> Don't use the "RAID" mode on the motherboard as it's likely
> "fake raid", instead use linux md driver for software raid,
> it's smoking fast for SATA drives and on my 3.2ghz box
> barely scratches the CPU resyncing.
>
> -Dorn
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Dorn Hetzel
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 02:17:47PM -0600, Me wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to build up a pretty meaty Asterisk box after doing our 
> initial testing and playing on a 1ghz system.
> 
> Right now I have decided on a prebuilt system which I normally don't do but 
> thought it seemed like a good deal.
> 
> I have included the initial specs below, I will be adding another 1 GB of RAM 
> for a total of 2 GB. 
> 
> My first question is regarding the serial ATA drives... I will be using 
> Fedora and considering FC1 seems to be the smartest of the builds when it 
> comes to the digium hardware, will I have to scrap the SATA drives because 
> FC1 doesn't support them or do I have bad information?
> 
> If I need to scrap the SATA drives and let's say I didn't care about the Raid 
> functionality, would you folks think that IDE drives would be fine or would 
> the speed of SCSI really make much of a difference when it comes to Asterisk? 
> If speed of drives does matter, can someone tell me why Asterisk might need 
> fast drives vs. say 7200 IDE drives?
> 
> Next and last question is, how many simultaneous calls do you folks figure I 
> can run on this in the following two scenarios:
> 
> 1- All clients would be using SIP devices like SPA-2000's and all calls would 
> originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> 2- All clients would be using IAX like Asterisk or an IAXy and all calls 
> would originate/terminate using an IAX termination partner.
> 
> 
> Here are the specs:
> 
>   a.. Dual (2) Intel Xeon 2.66GHz CPUs w/ HT Technology
>   b.. 533MHz Front Side Bus 
>   c.. 1GB PC2100 DDR ECC Registered Memory
>   d.. Two (2) 120GB SATA 7200RPM Hard Drives with 8MB Cache 
>   e.. 52X CD-RW Drive w/Burning Software 
>   f.. 3.5" 1.44MB Floppy Drive 
>   g.. ATI Rage XL with 8MB Onboard
>   h.. Onboard RAID controller 
>   i.. (2) Intel Ethernet Controllers (1x1000BT Gigabit & 1x10/100) 
>   j.. 2U Rackmount Chassis w/ 500-Watt Power Supply 
> 
> Thanks!
>

You don't need to scrap the SATA drives, they are very nice.
You might want to give Debian a try.
Don't use the "RAID" mode on the motherboard as it's likely
"fake raid", instead use linux md driver for software raid,
it's smoking fast for SATA drives and on my 3.2ghz box
barely scratches the CPU resyncing.

-Dorn
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compile Error

2004-12-28 Thread Dorn Hetzel
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:02:12PM +0200, David Norton wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> I have been running asterisk for about a week though on a debian system
> through apt-get. I am now trying to compile it use the CVS and im getting
> this error.
>  
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
>  
> What do I need to install to get rid of this message?
>
I built openssl from source to deal with that requirement,
your mileage may vary :)

-Dorn
  
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel ISDN BRI settings for The Netherlands KPN

2004-12-28 Thread Peter Svensson
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Remco Barende wrote:

> signalling = bri_cpe_ptmp
Use this to terminate a Point To Multipoint isdn line

> ; p2p TE mode
> ;signalling = bri_cpe
And this if the line is point-to-point. This is likely if you have did:s 
or multiple isdn lines grouped together. 

> ; p2mp NT mode
> ;signalling = bri_net_ptmp
> ; p2p NT mode
> ;signalling = bri_net
There are for acting as a switch to other isdn equipment such as isdn 
phones etc.

> pridialplan=local
> prilocaldialplan=local

The dialplan in Europe is often "unknown" which means you send the 
standard pots number, including any leading "0" for area codes / country 
codes. Talk to your pstn provider, they should be able to tell you what 
"Type Of Number" and "Numbering Plan" they expect you to send the dialed 
number (pridialplan) and your outgoing callerid (prilocaldialplan). 

You should also ask them how many digits they want you to send for
callerid. If you use DIDs then you can ask them how many digits thay pass 
for DID.

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] how to debug frame slips?

2004-12-28 Thread Peter Svensson
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Michael Welter wrote:

> Joe Presto wrote:
> > 
> >>Check 'vmstat 1'.  With a "quiet" system you should see mostly 100% idle 
> >>time.  How many interrupts are you seeing per one second interval?  It 
> >>should be +/- 1000 for the system timer and +/- 1000 for each Digium card.>
> > 
> > * confirmed.. about 1100 interrupts per sec
> > 
> Shouldn't you be seeing 1000 interrupts/s from the rtc?  And then 
> another 1000/s from the TDM card?  Do 'modprobe -r wcfxo' and wcfxs 
> (turn-off the TDM card) and check the interrupt count.

Older kernels used a 100 Hz system timer. RedHat switched during 2.4, the 
stock kernel switched later I think.

Peter



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Music instead of Tunes

2004-12-28 Thread Peter Svensson
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Marc Storck wrote:

> more and more operators in Europe offer music instead of ring tunes. 
> E.g. instead of the 400 Hz or whatever tunes, the caller will hear J-Lo, 
> or Mozart Currently I will have to answer the line to do that. Is 
> there a way to do this with asterisk?

See the help for dial:
   'm' -- provide hold music to the calling party until answered.

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

2004-12-28 Thread Eric Wieling aka ManxPower
Lane wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible with asterisk to deliver a dialtone to a software phone, such 
as kphone?

I'm able to dial, but the silence seems to confuse my users :)
SIP phones provide their own local dialtone.  If you can get the SIP 
phone to call a predefined extension when it goes offhook you can use 
DISA (show application DISA).  kphone can't even send DTMF OOB DTMF so I 
doubt it has any "hotline" features.

--Eric
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Gabriel Afana
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): relocation
> > R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
> > with -fPIC
> > /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Never seen that before. What OS are you using? What version of MySQL?

I am running Redhat ES Version 3 Update 4 on AMD64 platform

I just installed MySQL 4.1.8 (do any DBIs or anything needs to be
installed?)


> > Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: No such switch 'Realtime'
> > Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: No such switch 'Realtime'
> > Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: Channel 'SIP/gafana-8615' sent into
> invalid
> > extension 's' in context 'default', but no invalid handler
>
> These warnings tell me that you are not using most recent version of
> asterisk. What does "show version" say?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# /usr/sbin/asterisk -r
Asterisk 1.0.3, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium.
Written by Mark Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=
Connected to Asterisk 1.0.3 currently running on g0 (pid = 22313)
g0*CLI> show version
Asterisk 1.0.3 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a x86_64 running Linux


Did I set everything up right?

This is the DB setup:
MySQL:
   + users (DB name)
+ extensions (Table name)
+ I dont have any extensions in there yet

I dont have any extensions in the database yet but I dont see why that would
be a reason * says that Realtime switch doesn't exist.


Gabe


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Calling Card question

2004-12-28 Thread kelly . griffin
I am new to the list, so if this question is redundant, please point me in the
right direction for reading.

I want to setup some calling cards for fundraising.  I have ASTCC installed and
working, but I am wondering how things might work once in production.

A customer calls an 800 number (sixTel) and then dials Mexico (voipjet).  This
all stays IP and doesn't tie up phone lines. I've done it and understand it.

A customer calls in on PSTN and then calls Mexico (voipjet).  My PSTN is tied up
until they disconnect, right?

I am wondering how to minimize costs for an 800 number (.02 per minute) and LD
charges (VoIP).  Is there some magic I am missing?

--
Kelly D Griffin
Network Engineer
Tantella Wireless
http://tantella.com
479.273.9992 Voice
479.464.8998 Fax




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Gabriel Afana



Im pulling my hair out over here playing with this all night last night 
andall morningwhat am I missing!?!?I tried getting the Realtime 
extensions working...but I've been running intolots of problems and im 
getting frustrated.  first problem was theasterisk-addons wasn't 
compiling right saying:/usr/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): relocationR_X86_64_32 can not 
be used when making a shared object; recompilewith 
-fPIC/usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a: could not read symbols: Bad 
valuecollect2: ld returned 1 exit statusBut it still produced the 
res_config_mysql.so file so I copied it to mymodules directory.I 
have this in my extconfig.conf:[settings]s => 
mysql,user,extensionsAnd this is in my extensions.conf 
file:[sports]switch => Realtime/[EMAIL PROTECTED]When I run the 
sports context, it calls my phone but immediately hangsup...the error 
message is:Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: No such switch 
'Realtime'Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: No such switch 'Realtime'Dec 
29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: Channel 'SIP/gafana-8615' sent into 
invalidextension 's' in context 'default', but no invalid 
handler
Gabe
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] WARNING[22314]: No such switch 'Realtime'

2004-12-28 Thread Matthew Boehm
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): relocation
> R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
> with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Never seen that before. What OS are you using? What version of MySQL?

> Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: No such switch 'Realtime'
> Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: No such switch 'Realtime'
> Dec 29 12:58:22 WARNING[22260]: Channel 'SIP/gafana-8615' sent into
invalid
> extension 's' in context 'default', but no invalid handler

These warnings tell me that you are not using most recent version of
asterisk. What does "show version" say?

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Music instead of Tunes

2004-12-28 Thread Marc Storck
Hello,
more and more operators in Europe offer music instead of ring tunes. 
E.g. instead of the 400 Hz or whatever tunes, the caller will hear J-Lo, 
or Mozart Currently I will have to answer the line to do that. Is 
there a way to do this with asterisk?

Regards,
Marc
--
CTOMarc Storck
MS Networks SA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Service Provider  http://www.luxadmin.org
15, route d'Esch   Phone: +352 2727 3030
L-4544 Belvaux Fax:   +352 2727 3060
- MS Networks powered service -
http://www.Gateway.lu  Your gateway to the net
 Advantages of ADSL solutions by LuxAdmin:
 - price: cheap and clear
 - products: proven quality
 - support: friendly and helpful
---
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

2004-12-28 Thread Rick Green
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Lane wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is it possible with asterisk to deliver a dialtone to a software phone, such
> as kphone?
>
> I'm able to dial, but the silence seems to confuse my users :)

 Tell them to think of it as a cellphone...

-- 
Rick Green

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
 temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  -Benjamin Franklin

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


FW: [Asterisk-Users] Compile Error

2004-12-28 Thread David Norton








Sorry about that, I was been an idiot
again! 

 

I had openssl and libssl installed, but
had the wrong version of libssl-dev.

 

 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Norton
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004
10:02 PM
To: 'Asterisk
 Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Compile
Error



 

Hi,

 

I have been running asterisk for about a week though on a
debian system through apt-get. I am now trying to compile it use the CVS and im
getting this error.

 

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find –lssl

 

What do I need to install to get rid of this message?

 

Regards

 

David Norton





-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and is believed to be clean.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Brian Capouch
Paul Rodan wrote:
Curious, has anybody tried the Asterisk ipkg for OpenWRT on a WRT54G? 
http://nthill.free.fr/openwrt/ipkg/testing/Packages

I'm running it in a variety of configurations on a number of WRT54GS 
models.  There's no reason to think that it wouldn't work on the plain 
Gs as well, especially if they're the newer-issue models.

Beware of freaky performance in certain transcoding situations.  In 
general, except for GSM you can't do transcoding on it because of the 
lack of FPU.

Also you can't record voicemails directly to the jffs2 filesystem; the 
compression takes too long.  You have to do some magic with the ramfs 
(assuming you would want to store vms on an embedded system, which is a 
bit dicey) and then move them in non-real-time to the jffs2 partition 
behind the scenes.

I just ship my voicemail offboard.
B.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after timeout?

2004-12-28 Thread Me
Sorry about the HTML emails, on my laptop and forgot to change the sending
format from the default.


- Original Message - 
From: Me
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:01 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after
timeout?


I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box using an x100p (I think
that's the model number).

When I do this in my extensions.conf:

exten => 1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
exten => 1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)
exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten => 1200,4,Goto,t|1

The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and never really goes to the *
voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout regardless of how many seconds
I set it to.

I assume this has something to do with the fact that * considers the call
answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, right?

Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config work and go to the *
voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not answer after 20
seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy, have not run
into this yet so I am curious.

Thanks!


--
Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Hardware opinions?

2004-12-28 Thread Me



Hello, I am trying to build up a pretty meaty 
Asterisk box after doing our initial testing and playing on a 1ghz 
system.
 
Right now I have decided on a prebuilt system which 
I normally don't do but thought it seemed like a good deal.
 
I have included the initial specs below, I will be 
adding another 1 GB of RAM for a total of 2 GB. 
 
My first question is regarding the serial ATA 
drives... I will be using Fedora and considering FC1 seems to be the smartest of 
the builds when it comes to the digium hardware, will I have to scrap the SATA 
drives because FC1 doesn't support them or do I have bad 
information?
 
If I need to scrap the SATA drives and let's say I 
didn't care about the Raid functionality, would you folks think that IDE drives 
would be fine or would the speed of SCSI really make much of a difference when 
it comes to Asterisk? If speed of drives does matter, can someone tell me why 
Asterisk might need fast drives vs. say 7200 IDE drives?
 
Next and last question is, how many simultaneous 
calls do you folks figure I can run on this in the following two 
scenarios:
 
1- All clients would be using SIP devices like 
SPA-2000's and all calls would originate/terminate using an IAX termination 
partner.
2- All clients would be using IAX like Asterisk or 
an IAXy and all calls would originate/terminate using an IAX termination 
partner.
 
 
Here are the specs:
 

  Dual (2) Intel Xeon 2.66GHz CPUs w/ HT Technology
  533MHz Front Side Bus 
  1GB PC2100 DDR ECC Registered Memory
  Two (2) 120GB SATA 7200RPM Hard Drives with 8MB Cache 
  52X CD-RW Drive w/Burning Software 
  3.5" 1.44MB Floppy Drive 
  ATI Rage XL with 8MB Onboard
  Onboard RAID controller 
  (2) Intel Ethernet Controllers (1x1000BT Gigabit & 1x10/100) 
  2U Rackmount Chassis w/ 500-Watt Power Supply 
Thanks!
 
--
Start Your Own ISP!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

2004-12-28 Thread Paul Rodan
Lol.

It seems as simple as telling them to hit "9" and then dial. You can then
get Asterisk to generate a dialtone, you could use something like DISA (I'm
not too familiar with it [but I want to be]) or maybe just a background
sound of a dialtone, and have it in a context where the outbound rules are. 

I don't understand the need for a dialtone though, tell them it's more like
a cell phone. Just enter the number and dial, cell phones don't use
dial-tones.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Prior
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 3:01 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

Lane wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Is it possible with asterisk to deliver a dialtone to a software phone,
such 
> as kphone?
> 
> I'm able to dial, but the silence seems to confuse my users :)

Tell it's a software cell phone.


NEXT!!!


Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Two problems with the Perl AGI

2004-12-28 Thread vagabond_ast
Hi,

I have a * 1.0.3 running on a Gentoo box and I installed Perl AGi from
http://asterisk.gnuinter.net/files/asterisk-perl-0.08.tar.gz.

When I write this :

>#!/usr/bin/perl
>use Asterisk::AGI;
>my $AGI = new Asterisk::AGI;
>$AGI->exec ('Dial SIP/kphone1|30|tTr');
>my $duration = $AGI->get_variable('ANSWEREDTIME');
>print STDERR "\n duration : $duration\n";
>exit (0);

I obtain, on the CLI

> *CLI>
>   duration :

before the callee takes the call.

I tried this (sorry, it's ugly) :

>#!/usr/bin/perl
>use Asterisk::AGI;
>my $AGI = new Asterisk::AGI;
>$AGI->exec ('Dial SIP/kphone1|30|tTr');
>my $status = 0;
>while (!$status)
>{
>  $status = $AGI->get_variable('DIALSTATUS');
>}
>my $duration = $AGI->get_variable('ANSWEREDTIME');
>print STDERR "\n duration : $duration\n status  : $status\n";
>exit (0);

and it gives me :

>*CLI>
> duration ANSWER
> status  : ANSWER

In my extensions.conf I have :
>exten => 600, 1, Answer
>exten => 600, 2, DeadAGI(test.agi)
>exten => 600, 3, Hangup

Does someone see where is the problem?

Thanks,

Alex
  
-- 
vagabond_ast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

2004-12-28 Thread Steve Prior
Lane wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible with asterisk to deliver a dialtone to a software phone, such 
as kphone?

I'm able to dial, but the silence seems to confuse my users :)
Tell it's a software cell phone.
NEXT!!!
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sending call to analog then to Vmail after timeout?

2004-12-28 Thread Me



I have one analog line hooked in my Asterisk box 
using an x100p (I think that's the model number).
 
When I do this in my extensions.conf:
 
exten => 
1200,1,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)exten => 
1200,2,Dial(Zap/1/551212,20,rTt)exten => 1200,3,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])exten => 
1200,4,Goto,t|1
 
The phone rings beyond the 20 second timeout and 
never really goes to the * voicemail. I can't seem to get it to timeout 
regardless of how many seconds I set it to.
 
I assume this has something to do with the fact 
that * considers the call answered as soon as the zap channel picks it up, 
right?
 
Anyhow, is there a way to make the above config 
work and go to the * voicemail after 20 seconds if the called party does not 
answer after 20 seconds? Also, what happens if the called party's line is busy, 
have not run into this yet so I am curious.
 
Thanks!
 
 
--
Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Compile Error

2004-12-28 Thread David Norton








Hi,

 

I have been running asterisk for about a week though on a debian system through apt-get. I am now trying to compile
it use the CVS and im
getting this error.

 

/usr/bin/ld:
cannot find –lssl

 

What do I need to install to get rid of this message?

 

Regards

 

David Norton






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk users manual

2004-12-28 Thread Remco Barende
Hi List!
All Asterisk info I found so far is relating to installing hardware or 
configuring asterisk.

Does anybody know of a simple (small) manual for the users of *?
Especially where details like transferring calls, 3way conversations, 
setting voicemail, diverting calls etc. are discussed?

(I know that many of these things depend on how you configure asterisk but 
I guess there are a lot of general settings).

Would make it easier to deploy asterisk.
Thanks!
Remco
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

2004-12-28 Thread Lane
Hi,

Is it possible with asterisk to deliver a dialtone to a software phone, such 
as kphone?

I'm able to dial, but the silence seems to confuse my users :)

thanks,

lane
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] rejected calls from IAX provider

2004-12-28 Thread Joshua Colp
A register line simply tells the provider where to send your calls. It is
still up to you to setup a user entry in your iax.conf that they will use to
send the call. This is simply a case of you not properly configuring iax.

NEXT!!!

- Joshua Colp.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bartosz
Jozwiak
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 3:04 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] rejected calls from IAX provider

Hello,

I am register to IAX provider.

in iax.conf:
register => user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When the user is trying to call me my asterisk rejected all calls.
I get on debug:

Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Dec 28 16:00:05 NOTICE[9225]: chan_iax2.c:5402 socket_read: Rejected connect
attempt from 193.17.41.4
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
REJECT
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
REJECT
   Timestamp: 4ms  SCall: 3  DCall: 00284 [193.17.41.4:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bar

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Paul Rodan
So that's what the parameter is for. Jeesh. Live and learn. 

Anyways, I'm going to try DHCP Option 150 as well to see if that does the
trick. Thanks!

I think I have Wonder Shaper working on my WRT54G as well, so that'll do the
QOS I need. It's also a TFTP Server to hold the phones config files and it's
also a NTP server for the phones. 

Curious, has anybody tried the Asterisk ipkg for OpenWRT on a WRT54G? 
http://nthill.free.fr/openwrt/ipkg/testing/Packages

---
Package: asterisk
Priority: optional
Section: net
Version: 1.0.3-2
Architecture: mipsel
Maintainer: Nico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: http://nthill.free.fr/openwrt/sources/asterisk/
Filename: ./20041213/asterisk_1.0.3-2_mipsel.ipk
Size: 1062918
MD5sum: 7cd9ad192de66cfdc8a9140629d92375
Description: a complete software PBX
Depends: libncurses, libpthread
---


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 1:54 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the
Cisco79xx phones

Paul Rodan wrote:
> The thing I dislike the most about the 79xx phones is that in DHCP mode,
> they expect the DHCP server to tell them their TFTP server address. They
> won't let you set it manually. So if I don't have  DHCP server that gives
> TFTP server info, which is most of the DHCP servers at out there, then the
> phone won't be able to download any updates made to the SIP000*.cnf file. 

You can manually set the TFTP server address, we do it all the time. 
Just turn on "Alternate TFTP Server", then go up to the TFTP Server 
field and enter the IP address. Works like a charm.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] rejected calls from IAX provider

2004-12-28 Thread Bartosz Jozwiak
Hello,

I am register to IAX provider.

in iax.conf:
register => user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When the user is trying to call me my asterisk rejected all calls.
I get on debug:

Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Dec 28 16:00:05 NOTICE[9225]: chan_iax2.c:5402 socket_read: Rejected connect
attempt from 193.17.41.4
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
REJECT
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
REJECT
   Timestamp: 4ms  SCall: 3  DCall: 00284 [193.17.41.4:4569]
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLING NUMBER  : 
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: bartek
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65535
   ADSICPE : 0
   DATE TIME   : 161259521

Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass:
REJECT
   Timestamp: 4ms  SCall: 3  DCall: 00284 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   CAUSE   : No authority found
Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 00017ms  SCall: 00284  DCall: 0 [193.17.41.4:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : s
   CALLI

RE: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
> The thing I dislike the most about the 79xx phones is that in
> DHCP mode, they expect the DHCP server to tell them their
> TFTP server address. They won't let you set it manually.

Ummm, yes they do. The 7960 I had previously used DHCP to get it's
internal IP from my router but allowed me to specify "alternate TFTP"
which I specified as the IP of my PC.

-- 
Nabeel Jafferali
tel: 416.491.9136 (toronto)
 646.225.7426 (new york)
fwd: 46990
email/msn : nabeeljafferali.net
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Paul Rodan wrote:
The thing I dislike the most about the 79xx phones is that in DHCP mode,
they expect the DHCP server to tell them their TFTP server address. They
won't let you set it manually. So if I don't have  DHCP server that gives
TFTP server info, which is most of the DHCP servers at out there, then the
phone won't be able to download any updates made to the SIP000*.cnf file. 
You can manually set the TFTP server address, we do it all the time. 
Just turn on "Alternate TFTP Server", then go up to the TFTP Server 
field and enter the IP address. Works like a charm.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Paul Rodan wrote:
The thing I dislike the most about the 79xx phones is that in DHCP mode, 
they expect the DHCP server to tell them their TFTP server address. They 
won’t let you set it manually. So if I don’t have  DHCP server that 
gives TFTP server info, which is most of the DHCP servers at out there, 
then the phone won’t be able to download any updates made to the 
SIP000*.cnf file.

 

Using dhcpd on my full blown linux, I’ve added:
 

  next-server 10.5.5.1;
  option tftp-server-name "10.5.5.1";
 

to dhcpd.conf and that makes the phones take it fine. Initially I only 
needed the “next-server” option, but I found the oldest firmware’s of 
the 79xx sometimes ignored this parameter, I added “option 
tftp-server-name” and that seems to have fixed the problem. It’s 
probably only in my head, but you never know.

 

Anyways, I’m playing with the LinkSys WRT54G router now with OpenWRT 
installed. I’m trying to use dnsmasq to give the same parameters. In 
dnsmasq.conf I’ve added:

 

“dhcp-option=66,10.5.5.1”
 

But the Cisco phones are ignoring it. According to RFC2132, DHCP 
Option/Code 66 is the TFTP server name. But the Cisco 79xx phones I’ve 
tested are ignoring this.

 

My question is this, does the Cisco 79xx IP Phones use a different DHCP 
Code (other than 66) to define its TFTP server?

 

Also, does the Cisco 79xx honor DHCP Option 42, which defines the NTP 
server? Or does it only honor the “sntp_server=” option in its config file?

 

 

Maybe there’s a way to query the dhcp server on my Linux server and 
figure out which DHCP codes it’s offering. I can then mimick it with 
dnsmasq?
Paul,
	Try DHCP option 150.  I don't know what is about about those Cisco's, 
but they sure are picky (and evidently not RFC Compliant).

--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Polycom phone stops working

2004-12-28 Thread Ross Kevlin
my polycom 300 works fine when i first turn it on but after five minutes or
so it stops accepting calls but i can still make calls from it.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux Distribution

2004-12-28 Thread Dorn Hetzel
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 09:13:02AM -0800, Geoff Nordli wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> scribbled on :
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 12:29:21PM +, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
> >> Seth Ueland Chancy wrote:
> >> 
> >> Probably your best bet is Debian + 2.4 kernel + X100P card + apt-get
> >> install asterisk 
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jean-Michel.
> > 
> > I can also confirm that * works fine on Debian w/2.6.10-rc2-mm3 for
> > the adventurous :) 
> > 
> > -Dorn
> > 
> 
> Jean-Michel or Dorn, did you have any issues compiling the zaptel-source
> with the 2.4.27-1 or 2.6.x kernels on Sarge?
>
Well, I think I'm acually running Woody boosted to 2.6.10-rc2-mm3, but
I had no problems at all with "make linux26" on zaptel after reading
README.Linux26 ...  Mostly just making sure make can find your kernel
source.

-Dorn
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Callmanager 4.1 and asterisk

2004-12-28 Thread Keith O'Brien




I have a similar 
setup.   To make it easy and get the best of both worlds, have the 
Linux softphones (SIP or IAX) register to Asterisk.   Keep the 
physical phones registered to CM.   From there setup a dialplan on 
both Call Manager and Asterisk to relay calls between the two 
systems.   For example, assign all physical phones extension 2XXX and 
softphones 3XXX.   Have asterisk route 2XXX calls to CM via SIP and 
vice versa on Call Manager.
Also, just so that you are aware 
you can register a SIP Linux softclient to Cisco Call Manager if you are running 
Version 4.1
---
Hello everybody,
im newbie in VoIP, but find this project asterisk very 
interesting, i tried to install and its a great sw, i really get sorprised about 
all of its functions, we need to use the asterisk server in conjunction with 
cisco callmanager.
We have a Cisco Callmanager 4.1 and the clients are softphones 
from cisco IPCommunicator, but all the support service of our company are linux 
machines, i read about callmanager uses skinny a propetary protocol and there 
are no softphones from linux to talk with it, so we need to install vmware to 
use ipcommunicator or the other solutions as i read is get the asterisk server 
using sip phones in the linux and windows machines and configure the call 
manager to talk with the asterisk server thru sip protocol, is this the real way 
to do that?? is there a easy way to do this?? i found this link
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Cisco+CallManager+Integration
but i need to know what things to do to transfer all the 
extensions from de callmanager to the asterisk sw, or if only made the changes 
in the sip.conf as said in the link above the callmanager gets all the 
control??
or if i need to declare all the extensions in the asterisk?? can 
anybody help me??
TIA
Edgar


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] DHCP, the TFTP Server setting and the Cisco 79xx phones

2004-12-28 Thread Paul Rodan








The thing I dislike the most about the 79xx phones is that
in DHCP mode, they expect the DHCP server to tell them their TFTP server
address. They won’t let you set it manually. So if I don’t have 
DHCP server that gives TFTP server info, which is most of the DHCP servers at
out there, then the phone won’t be able to download any updates made to
the SIP000*.cnf file. 

 

Using dhcpd on my full blown linux, I’ve added:

 

  next-server 10.5.5.1;

  option tftp-server-name "10.5.5.1";

 

to dhcpd.conf and that makes the phones take it fine.
Initially I only needed the “next-server” option, but I found the
oldest firmware’s of the 79xx sometimes ignored this parameter, I added “option
tftp-server-name” and that seems to have fixed the problem. It’s
probably only in my head, but you never know.

 

Anyways, I’m playing with the LinkSys WRT54G router
now with OpenWRT installed. I’m trying to use dnsmasq to give the same
parameters. In dnsmasq.conf I’ve added:

 

“dhcp-option=66,10.5.5.1”

 

But the Cisco phones are ignoring it. According to RFC2132,
DHCP Option/Code 66 is the TFTP server name. But the Cisco 79xx phones I’ve
tested are ignoring this.

 

My question is this, does the Cisco 79xx IP Phones use a
different DHCP Code (other than 66) to define its TFTP server?

 

Also, does the Cisco 79xx honor DHCP Option 42, which
defines the NTP server? Or does it only honor the “sntp_server=”
option in its config file?

 

 

Maybe there’s a way to query the dhcp server on my
Linux server and figure out which DHCP codes it’s offering. I can then
mimick it with dnsmasq?






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Incoming Calls

2004-12-28 Thread C F
-- Forwarded message --
From: C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:21:45 -0500
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Incoming Calls
To: Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


I didn't try Dial but I did try wait and it didn't help. I'll try dial
and see what happens. It might take a while until I do that, since I'm
waiting for a new TDM400 (the other one I installed by a client).


On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:32:23 -0600, Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd have to guess that in your example, the exten=s entries are the
> root of the issue and is answering the call when you didn't expect it.
> Try something like this:
>  [default]
>  exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/3010)
>  exten => s,2,Hangup
> where 3010 is a valid extension. You should find that zap/4 is not
> answered until you pick up exten 3010.
>
> Also, based only on what you're showing below, it does not look like
> the contexts are working the way that you think they should. It
> appears the [default] either drops through and executes the statements
> in [incoming], or, there is something else going on in your specific
> case where the contexts aren't what you expect.
>
> 
> > I don't know what I did wrong but it didn't work. Here is how I
> > configured it (i have a TDM400, configured with 4 fxo, channel 4 was
> > the one I wanted to share):
> > zapata.conf
> > ...
> > context=incoming
> > channel=1-3
> > context=default
> > channel=4
> > ===
> > extensions.conf
> > ...
> > [default]
> >
> > [incoming]
> > exten=s,1,do some code
> > ==
> > I left the default context blank with no extensions b/c I didn't want
> > it to pick up. However * would pick up and in the console I get:
> > invalid extension s,1 in context default, then it would look for the t
> > extension. But it picked up after 2 rings. what am I doing wrong?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 05:31:12 -0600, Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not sure why it didn't work for you unless we are talking about two
> > > different things. It does work for me and has been working just fine
> > > for over a year now.
> > >
> > > 
> > > > Just a note on this. I tried using an external device with the TDM400
> > > > configured as 4 FXO to ring even with asterisk. But no matter how I
> > > > configured it, asterisk always picked up. and the external device
> > > > didn't ring (just the first ring for CallerID to come in).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Here is where the problem is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When the call comes in, it will be ringing on 2 of the FXO ports,
> > > > > > and all the other phones in the office. I would like various / all
> > > > > > the IP phones to ring, however asterisk must not answer the call
> > > > > > while that is happening or else the normal extension would not
> > > > > > continue ringing. Obviously when an IP phone answers it will then
> > > > > > pick up the call and connect the 2. Is this possible, or is this
> > > > > > how it normally works by default?
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe. Part of the answer is dependent upon exactly how your existing
> > > > > pbx handles the call.
> > > > >
> > > > > The approach I'd use for testing purposes is _not_ to ring both
> > > > > extensions to asterisk, but rather just one of them. When that
> > > > > extension rings, asterisk's fxo card will sense the ringing and
> > > > > the logic within your dialplan will have something like:
> > > > >  exten => s,1,Dial(${PHONE1}&${PHONE2})
> > > > > that will cause two sip phones to ring. You can add more sip phones
> > > > > to that statement if you'd like. If one of those sip phones answers
> > > > > the call, the fxo port will go off-hook (to your existing pbx),
> > > > > causing it to believe the call was answered; the existing pbx analog
> > > > > phones should then stop ringing.
> > > > >
> > > > > If an existing pbx analog extension answers the call, ringing to the
> > > > > asterisk fxo port will stop, and therefore ringing to the sip phones
> > > > > will stop a few seconds later.
> > > > >
> > > > > There will likely be a lag of time between ringing of analog phones
> > > > > and ringing of sip phones (by one or two rings), which might be
> > > > > somewhat disturbing to people that can hear both phones ringing.
> > > > > Should someone answer an analog extension first and someone answers
> > > > > a ringing sip phone seconds later, the sip phone user will hear
> > > > > nothing more then dialtone (depending upon how much lag actually
> > > > > exists).
> > > > >
> > > > > The above essentially says that one of the existing pbx to asterisk
> > > > > fxo interfaces must be dedicated to your special ringing arrangement.
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update option

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and ISDN via RemoteCapi

2004-12-28 Thread Juergen K. Zick
Hi folks,
I was looking quite unsuccessfully for some info or experiences using * 
with chan_capi or isdn4linux using a RemoteCapi client (distributed Capi 
client), based on ISDN-DCP based ISDN-routers like a Zyxel Prestige 202 or 
CISCO 740 or BINTEC BIANCA RCapi ...

Anybody out there who could give me some advice or report experiences ?
TIA, Jürgen
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] turn on/off auto/attendant by dialing an extension

2004-12-28 Thread Jon Radon
I think you're misunderstanding DBget and DBput.  Asterisk has a built
in database where it will store this information.  No need for MySQL
or any other DB software.  This solution will provide you with
copy/paste installations and is by far the simplest solution.

You can read about the Asterisk database here.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+database

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:43:00 -0500, Tony Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't used MySql much... and would like a simple solution I can
> copy/paste to other installations.
> 
> A.G. (Tony) Nichols
> I.S. Manager
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 


-- 
Is it something someone said, was it something someone said?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] VoIP Equipment

2004-12-28 Thread Garrett Smith








Anyone interested in a lot of gently used IP500’s with
SIP Image? Also, anyone in need of large quantities of SPA-2000’s at an
extreme discount?

 

If so, please contact me off list.

 

Thanks,

 

Garrett Smith

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

B2 Technologies/ VoIPSupply.com

454 Sonwil Drive

Buffalo, NY 14225

 

(716) 250-3408 Direct

(716) 630-1548 Fax

(716) 903-9495 Cell

 

AOL IM: B2sales

 

Specializing
in New and Used equipment from vendors including Cisco Systems, Juniper,
Adtran, Dialogic, Lucent, Nortel, Sipura, Granstream, Snom, Mediatrix, Carrier
Access, Digium, Zultys, IPDialog and more.

 

 

 






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Steve Kann
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
I was wondering what could be pros and cons of ztdummy vs proper 
timer device (i.e. X100P).

I am going to set up an asterisk server in europe (to do trunking, to 
save bandwith) and I was wondering if it'll be OK to get it going 
with ztdummy.

Furthermore, I have only a 1024/256kbps PPPOE DSL link and I need to 
squeeze 12 channels through, I was wondering which codec would be 
suitable for this? Is g.729a going to be indispensable or can I get 
away with something like GSM?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel.

Jean-Michel,
Ztdummy can be okay, but true hardware timing WILL be better. But, as 
Rich pointed out, that 256kbps ADSL is probably going to hurt:

256 - 41 = 215kbps usable bandwidth (%16 PPPoE overhead)
IAX2 trunking with g729: 40kbps
each add. call: - 10kbps
So, 215 - 40 - 110 = 65kbps
You only have about 65kbps to spare, and all of this is based on ideal 
(theoritical) conditions. I doubt that those 12 calls will sound okay, 
or even work at all...

But, you can always try!
You might do better with Speex ABR at 8kbps or 10kbps average bitrate; 
(or, speex vbr) At least with speex you have the knobs to turn to tune 
things a bit better..

(which led me to find a bug in the ABR settings for speex in * CVS..).
-SteveK
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3, TDM11B (DEVPCI) and asterisk

2004-12-28 Thread C F
I had the same problem, the way I worked it around was that I added
the follwoing to the script:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/zaptel
case "$1" in
  start)
# Load drivers
rmmod wcusb >& /dev/null
rmmod wcfxsusb >& /dev/null
rmmod audio >& /dev/null
action "Loading zaptel framework: " modprobe zaptel
 sleep 10 # I addec this line although 5 might work for you I didnt test it
echo -n "Loading zaptel hardware modules: "
for x in $MODULES; do 
if insmod ${x} ${ARGS} >& /dev/null; then
echo -n "$x "
fi
done
echo
action "Running ztcfg: " /sbin/ztcfg
RETVAL=$?



On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:31:25 -0500, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanx for the tip but I had already copied the init script over myself and
> eventually even tried to hack it.
> 
> What I *should* have posted before was that when the init script runs it
> didn't/doesn't work...that is until I run the ztcfg manually.
> 
> I ended up adding this to the rc.local to make it work through a reboot.
> 
> ztcfg
> /etc/init.d/asterisk restart
> 
> Jeff
> - Original Message -
> From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3, TDM11B (DEVPCI) and asterisk
> 
> > Do a make config in /usr/src/zaptel this will take care of the init.d
> script.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 04:48:50 -0500, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the response but it turned out to be two tiered...
> > >
> > > I had to run ztcfg manually because it was not run in the init script.
> > >
> > > I was able to get it to work on another motherboard. (using the
> technique
> > > above)
> > >
> > > After two days a fiddling, compiling, etc I started dreaming about these
> > > files ;-)
> > >
> > > Great product!
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > > 
> > > Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 11:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3, TDM11B (DEVPCI) and asterisk
> > >
> > > > Yes I do. Post the zapata.conf, zaptel.conf and the extensions.conf,
> > > > i'll see what I can do.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:49:27 -0500, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > Hey folks;
> > > > >
> > > > >  I am a old Dialogic telephony hack and have tried asterisk a while
> back
> > > on
> > > > > a laptop with the OSS module and I liked what I saw. I recently came
> > > across
> > > > > some info regarding asterisk 1.0 and thought I should give it a go.
> I
> > > used a
> > > > > AMD K7 MB, compiled the binaries without a real problem and realized
> > > that I
> > > > > might have a sound card issue because I couldn't hear the messages
> but
> > > the
> > > > > demo worked otherwise. I noticed that my sound card was having a
> problem
> > > so
> > > > > I abandoned that approach but I'm not finished just yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I then decided to get a DEV kit and give it a real go. I compiled
> the
> > > > > binaries (zaptel and asterisk) without incident and I was able to
> start
> > > the
> > > > > drivers. I have green lights on port 1 and 4 and I understand that
> port
> > > 1 is
> > > > > the station port (for a 2500 set regular phone set?) and that port 4
> is
> > > able
> > > > > to connect to a regular 1FL (simple pots line).
> > > > >
> > > > > I used some 'examples' from the Digium site and when that didn't
> work I
> > > used
> > > > > a few from a link I found
> > > > >
> (http://iheavy.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=35)
> > > but
> > > > > I have no dialtone on the phone and it won't pickup (or write ANY
> logs)
> > > when
> > > > > I call the line.
> > > > >
> > > > > My question(s) for the list is/are;
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have a working asterisk system using zaptel TDM cards on
> FC3
> > > > > with kernel  2.6.9-1.681_FC3 and if so, is there something that I am
> > > > > missing?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any tips would be appreciated and thanx in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users

[Asterisk-Users] ztdummy necessary?

2004-12-28 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
I have got my first * server set up and serving users in three different
locations over the Internet. This is currently a test setup so I am
experimenting with the different features of *.

When I set up asterisk, I only checked out the Stable source of Asterisk
from CVS, and compiled it. I did not download nor compile libpri or
zaptel.

Now, I have internal calling and calling through my IAX providers
working fine. Voicemail (email delivery only) works fine. Incoming calls
to my DIDs are presented with a menu, that works fine. Even
music-on-hold works fine after I emerge-d mpg123 (on Gentoo).

My question is, do I need ztdummy at all? I don't intend to use
conferencing at all.

--
Nabeel Jafferali
tel: 416.491.9136 (toronto)
 646.225.7426 (new york)
fwd: 46990
email/msn : nabeeljafferali.net
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Wildcard remote looping

2004-12-28 Thread Mark Farver
Is there something special that needs to be done to allow a T100P/T400
to respond to a remote loop request?

I am having some issues with a Point to point T1 line using zaptel ppp.
This line gave us small problems when we had a pair of Cisco 2600's on
either end but now with the zaptel ppp it is going down every couple of
minutes for 15 intervals.   

The phone company says the line is good to the smartjacks but says they
were unable to loop up the asterisk boxes at either end.  (And there is
a fairly long and untrustworthy cat 5 extension from the smart jacks to
the asterisk boxes.)

Thanks
Mark Farver

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Mysql and Voicemail

2004-12-28 Thread Nicolas FOURNIL
Hello

try to enable mysql debug:

"log=/var/log/mysqlfull.log" in your /etc/my.cnf
and off course reload mysql

then

tail -f /var/log/mysqlfull.log

it will show you if your asterisk connects to the DB... if not, it's a
makefile problem... re-read tutorial...

PS: don't forget to try if your "full-log" works by connect by anyways to
the db. (And works fine like mysql ans "show databases" command)


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Alessio
Focardi
Envoye : mardi 28 decembre 2004 10:41
A : asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Objet : [Asterisk-Users] Mysql and Voicemail


Hi,

I would like to enable mysql handling of voicemail boxes ... following
that tutorial

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+voicemail+database

so I modified the makefile of /apps directory to include

USE_MYSQL_VM_INTERFACE=1

and copied mysql-vm-routines.h in the /apps dir, set up the db and
some boxes in the table, also edited the voicemail.conf file.

Everything compiles just fine, then when I start * I have no results,

"show voicemail users" --> There are no voicemail users currently defined

also if I try to check against a box with "MailboxExists" it does not
result created 

Any idea of what I'm getting wrong ?

tnx !




--
Best regards,
 Alessio  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >