[Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 - Disable DND feature?
Hi, Is it possible to disable the DND feature on a Polycom 501? Regards, Jan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P and monoBRI auto-dial call difference: caller phone does not ring
Hi, I'm using Asterisk 1.2.1 on a Debian Sarge with a TDM400P and a monoBRI using chan-mISDN from beronet site. It seems to work all right except for autodial calls, monoBRI ISDN channel behaves differently waiting for the caller to answer and then continue. Asterisk console says: analog: -- Attempting call on Zap/2/3391818250 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) Channel Zap/2-1 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(Zap/2-1, exten2.py|ticket=19) in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py ISDN: -- Attempting call on mISDN/1/3391818250/s for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) *Asterisk stops here for the caller to answer then go on to show the rest:* Channel mISDN/1-u8 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(mISDN/1-u8, exten2.py|ticket=21) in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py Why this pause? This is a problem because with ISDN the calling party phone does not ring. Is there some parametere to set in misdn.conf?? TIA Giorgio Incantalupo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] dtmf tones
If I call PSTN number a, than I can call the extension number, while when I call PSTN phone number b the tones are ignored. If I call PSTN PSTN directly the extension number can be dialed. How can I improve that? bye Ronald Wiplinger ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Phones behind dynamic IPs
I would also recomend that you upgrade to the latest firmware 1.0.2.13 (contact grandstream) as it does fix some registeration issues and have extra NAT/STUN features. On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 17:15, Chris Bagnall wrote: Greetings list, I'm coming across an issue with some of the GXP-2000 phones we have out in the wild at clients' employees' homes. In most cases they're behind consumer ADSL NAT routers on a dynamic IP from their ISP. In a nutshell, the phone is unable to be called unless it's restarted first, after which it's fine for a good few hours, then it stops working until restarted again. The problem doesn't seem to be anywhere near as regular with users that are on cable connections (these tend to have much more sticky IP addresses - they change only every few months rather than every time the ADSL router connects), and non-existent on ADSL connections with static IPs. I've tried various permutations - with STUN, without STUN, NAT keep-alives down as low as 10 seconds, nat=yes in sip.conf, ports forwarded to the phone, ports *not* forwarded to the phone, etc. I think what's happening is that the ADSL router is reconnecting after a break in the connection (as it should), getting a different IP, but the phones don't seem to be recognising they've got a different IP and updating the asterisk server with the good news. Has anyone else encountered similar issues? Anything else I can try (bearing in mind I have no control over the ADSL connections the users are subscribed to)? Thanks in advance. Regards, Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320 and asterisk 1.07 bristuffed
Title: Messaggio Ihave 13 Snom 320 with asterisk 1.07 bristuffed. The problem is that sometimes on random basis, when one customer is placed on hold and another call arrives, the customers are put in conference with each other. This look very strange to me, but I've disabled the confernce button on the snom phones to prevent the human errors, but it still occurs. Investigating I've discovered that a similar problem was fixed with the Snom320 Release 5.2 (http://www.snom.com/snom320_release_notes.html ) It says: fixed unwanted conference bug in offhook/enter during ringback with an incoming call BUT my phones are already running 5.2 firmware. Any idea? Am I the only one with this problem? Do you think is the usual buggy-snom firmware problem? Or it might be an Asterisk problem? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] meetme conference latency degrades...
This is a known problem and it does not matter what zaptel timer you use. A solution is available in 'svn head' by using asterisk.conf internal_timing = yes OR Enable internal timing support (-I) on the command line. I don't know if this has been backported to the stable branch. Chris - Original Message - From: Michael George [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:48 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] meetme conference latency degrades... We have recently started making more frequent use of the meetme conference of our * system. We are using v1.0.8 with a 2.6.11 kernel on our system. We generally have 4 callers in it: two with the gsm codec and 2 with g729. Initially, the conference works fine and there is little latency. After about 15min., though, the latency is very noticable and by 25min it's unbearable. If we all leave the conference and return, the latency is unnoticable again. The load on the box is minimal, and only our meetme is running most of the time. Checking system load with top shows 0.1 or less. We have no digium hardware and use ztdummy for our timing device. zttest yields results generally in the area of 99.96%, but about 3-4% will be as low as 95%. In much smaller systems with Digium hardware, the accuracy is never below 99.98% and is often 100%. Is this apparent inaccuracy of the ztdummy timer likely the cause of the increasing latency in our meetme conference? Is there any way to improve it? Thank you, in advance, for any help. -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in this world: Those who can count in binary and those who cannot. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Using console channel with specific codec only
Hi, I configured a console channel for my sound card and assigned an extension to it. That way, I am able to talk to any SIP account when they call this extension. For testing purposes, I now would like to be able to allow only one specific codec and reject all calls to the console with other codecs. Problem is, the mechanism with allow/disallow only works for SIP accounts. Any suggestions on how to accomplish this? Thanks, Patrick ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Option wW picking up the *1 is a bit flaky
I noticed one thing: I got courtesytone = beep in my features.conf If I took it off, I got no sound. That's one sorted out :-) Do you have this on it? Do you have a global DYNAMIC_FEATURES = monitor in extensions.conf ? Yes. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] echo in Snom 360 phones
On 5/3/06, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of my users reports frequently hearing echo on her Snom 360 phone, even while talking to other Snom phones (via Asterisk) on the same LAN (i.e., all-digital low-latency connection). I can never reproduce it though, and swapping the phone didn't help. Has anyone else seen mystery echo on Snom phones? Any suggestions for debugging? On my own Snom 360, I sometimes hear an echo for the first second or two, and then it goes away. I guess an echo cancellation circuit kicks in, inside the Snom. We use snoms is a number of locations, and occasionally hear reports of echo from users making internal SIP to SIP calls. I believe that some of the older (much older) versions of the snom firmware were quite poor at echo prevention, so the remote handset may be the issue. Remember that echo is almost always caused by the far-end and not the person hearing it. We use the 4.5 firmware on snom320/snom360 phones, and 3.60x firmware on snom190 phones with good results. There is also the possibility that the microphone volume on the snom360 is set too high. 4 or 5 is about normal. Cheers, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SetGroup and CheckGroup. Need some help on the dialplan
From this list I found that I could use SetGroup and CheckGroup to do what I wanted. But I'm not quite sure how I do it. The case is that I have 3 user groups, and one main group. The main group is for all the incoming calls from external phones. The main group should be allowed to have 3 calls at the time. The 3 user groups are internal groups that I want to limit by ony having one incoming call at the time. So if userA-Phone1 is on the phone. UserB-phone 2 shouldn't get any calls. Illustration: (hope it don't get messed up) Incomming Call -- My Company -- Group1 -- UserA-phone1 -- UserA-phone2 -- Group2 --- UserB-phone3 --- UserB-phone4 -- Group3 --- UserC-phone5 --- UserC-phone6 So what I want per group level is that only one user (phone) is active at the time. And if all of the groups are busy, I want to send the caller to voicemail. Everyone can call out at the same time, but it must update the group count the phone belongs to. The main problem for me is the dialplan that decides witch Groups are available. And also how to decide witch group to update on outgoing calls. (all the users use the same extensions and peer for outgoing) Hope that made sense. Thanks Regards, Arne Morten ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] hyperthreading and zaptel
Finally, I decided to turn hyperthreading back on, and everything is back to normal. Unless there is somewhere in CentOS 4.3 that has the processor count hardcoded from the install, I am baffled by this. Was it on when * and zaptel was compiled?. Maybe the compiler produced HT optimized binaries. Just a thought? Mark ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA941 SPA942 BUG. auto answer does not work.
On Thursday 04 May 2006 20:53, Asterisk wrote: The handsets do not work with the SIP flag to make them AUTO-ANSWER. (As documented is should) Ie, you cannot use them with intercom or Page features. Works fine here; SIPAddHeader(Call-Info:\;answer-after=0) hads -- You buttered your bread, now lie in it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SPA941 SPA942 BUG. auto answer does not work.
Hello all, I want to report a BUG with the Linksys SPA94X so it is general knowledge and that we can all make noise about it so it will get fixed sooner.. The handsets do not work with the SIP flag to make them AUTO-ANSWER. (As documented is should) Ie, you cannot use them with intercom or Page features. This works with the Sipura841 fine. So linksys broke it. Um.. interesting is it not, considering it works with there SPA9000 unit... sounds a bit fishy to me.. So any Linksys owners using Asterisk, do pass on some discontentment, and Email linksys tech support at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] And tell them you have this issue.. James ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P and monoBRI auto-dial call difference: caller phone does not ring
probably it's better to auto-dial the calling phone first, and then let the established channel go out to the recipient! So when the calling phone answers, the call will go out to the recipient. Hope this helps... 2006/5/4, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi,I'm using Asterisk 1.2.1 on a Debian Sarge with a TDM400P and a monoBRIusing chan-mISDN from beronet site. It seems to work all right except for autodial calls, monoBRI ISDNchannel behaves differently waiting for the caller to answer and thencontinue.Asterisk console says:analog: -- Attempting call on Zap/2/3391818250 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) Channel Zap/2-1 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(Zap/2-1, exten2.py|ticket=19) in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py ISDN: -- Attempting call on mISDN/1/3391818250/s for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1)*Asterisk stops here for the caller to answer then go on to show the rest:* Channel mISDN/1-u8 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(mISDN/1-u8, exten2.py|ticket=21) in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.pyWhy this pause? This is a problem because with ISDN the calling party phone does not ring.Is there some parametere to set in misdn.conf??TIAGiorgio Incantalupo___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
AW: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Phones behind dynamic IPs
I have thew same problem. Ui tried with dyn dns in the externip field in sip.conf but I think the Asterisk does not allow this. Unfortunally I have every day a new ip. Maybe I can write a script witch takes my actual ip from externat and put it into the externip field. Maybe this solves the problem. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Gareth Blades Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2006 09:59 An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Betreff: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Phones behind dynamic IPs I would also recomend that you upgrade to the latest firmware 1.0.2.13 (contact grandstream) as it does fix some registeration issues and have extra NAT/STUN features. On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 17:15, Chris Bagnall wrote: Greetings list, I'm coming across an issue with some of the GXP-2000 phones we have out in the wild at clients' employees' homes. In most cases they're behind consumer ADSL NAT routers on a dynamic IP from their ISP. In a nutshell, the phone is unable to be called unless it's restarted first, after which it's fine for a good few hours, then it stops working until restarted again. The problem doesn't seem to be anywhere near as regular with users that are on cable connections (these tend to have much more sticky IP addresses - they change only every few months rather than every time the ADSL router connects), and non-existent on ADSL connections with static IPs. I've tried various permutations - with STUN, without STUN, NAT keep-alives down as low as 10 seconds, nat=yes in sip.conf, ports forwarded to the phone, ports *not* forwarded to the phone, etc. I think what's happening is that the ADSL router is reconnecting after a break in the connection (as it should), getting a different IP, but the phones don't seem to be recognising they've got a different IP and updating the asterisk server with the good news. Has anyone else encountered similar issues? Anything else I can try (bearing in mind I have no control over the ADSL connections the users are subscribed to)? Thanks in advance. Regards, Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P and monoBRI auto-dial call difference: caller phone does not ring
Hi picciux, maybe it could work, even if I don't know how to call a phone a channel and create a bridge between them. I'd prefer to use Asterisk inner features like the auto-dial out call moving a .call file to /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing: this works for analog line but not for ISDN. But only in this case.when normally calling from a phone using an ISDN line, everything works fine. It is the .call mechanism which does not workand I want to understand why, but it seems nobody had this problem before. It is also true not many people use BRI ISDN. Btw, thanx again. Giorgio Incantalupo picciuX wrote: probably it's better to auto-dial the calling phone first, and then let the established channel go out to the recipient! So when the calling phone answers, the call will go out to the recipient. Hope this helps... 2006/5/4, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'm using Asterisk 1.2.1 on a Debian Sarge with a TDM400P and a monoBRI using chan-mISDN from beronet site. It seems to work all right except for autodial calls, monoBRI ISDN channel behaves differently waiting for the caller to answer and then continue. Asterisk console says: analog: -- Attempting call on Zap/2/3391818250 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) Channel Zap/2-1 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(Zap/2-1, exten2.py|ticket=19) in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py ISDN: -- Attempting call on mISDN/1/3391818250/s for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) *Asterisk stops here for the caller to answer then go on to show the rest:* Channel mISDN/1-u8 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(mISDN/1-u8, exten2.py|ticket=21) in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py Why this pause? This is a problem because with ISDN the calling party phone does not ring. Is there some parametere to set in misdn.conf?? TIA Giorgio Incantalupo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com http://Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P and monoBRI auto-dial call difference: caller phone does not ring
hi giorgio... when i said ring the calling phone first I mean using a .call file! I think now you are doing, in your .call files,something like this: Channel: Zap/2/3391818250 or mISDN/1/3391818250/s . . . and the rest to send this channel to the calling phone. This way, you have to wait the dial-out channel to be answered before connect it to the calling phone. The fact that it works with TDM400 is only due to the fact that analog lines don't support call progress, so the call appears answered as soon as the fxo channel starts dialing out. With digital lines, instead, the channel is answered only when the remote party pickups the handset, that is correct. You will find same beaviour if you dial avoip line. But, if you make your .callto connect to the calling phone first, then the call will go out ONLY when the calling party pickups! Which is correct! By the way, doing like you do, you could have a situation where the remote party (33918) pickups an incoming call and hears a ringing tone waiting the calling phone to answer. Don't know if I make it clear... anyway... you're italian i think... if you want we can talk more about that privately, and in italian! Bye picciuX 2006/5/4, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi picciux,maybe it could work, even if I don't know how to call a phone a channeland create a bridge between them. I'd prefer to use Asterisk inner features like the auto-dial out callmoving a .call file to /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing: this works foranalog line but not for ISDN. But only in this case.when normally calling from a phone using an ISDN line, everything works fine. It isthe .call mechanism which does not workand I want to understand why,but it seems nobody had this problem before. It is also true not many people use BRI ISDN.Btw, thanx again.Giorgio IncantalupopicciuX wrote: probably it's better to auto-dial the calling phone first, and then let the established channel go out to the recipient! So when the calling phone answers, the call will go out to the recipient. Hope this helps... 2006/5/4, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'm using Asterisk 1.2.1 on a Debian Sarge with a TDM400P and a monoBRI using chan-mISDN from beronet site. It seems to work all right except for autodial calls, monoBRI ISDN channel behaves differently waiting for the caller to answer and then continue. Asterisk console says: analog:-- Attempting call on Zap/2/3391818250 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) Channel Zap/2-1 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(Zap/2-1, exten2.py|ticket=19) in new stack-- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py ISDN:-- Attempting call on mISDN/1/3391818250/s for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) *Asterisk stops here for the caller to answer then go on to show the rest:* Channel mISDN/1-u8 was answered. -- Executing DeadAGI(mISDN/1-u8, exten2.py|ticket=21) in new stack-- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/exten2.py Why this pause? This is a problem because with ISDN the calling party phone does not ring. Is there some parametere to set in misdn.conf?? TIA Giorgio Incantalupo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com http://Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial Option wW picking up the *1 is a bit flaky
All sorted now. The features timeout needs to be quite high on mobiles. After a few tests, it works perfectly. thanks for your help :-) Mark ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] ISAC support?
Hi All. Has there been done any work to support ISAC ? Thanks, trond ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Pattern matching DISA
I would like to create an variable length extension that when used with DISA ends when i dial the pound sign (#) but i cant figure out how to do it something like exten = _*21*.# ; but this doesn't work, after i dial # it still waits a few seconds ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Pattern matching DISA
I would like to create an variable length extension that when used with DISA ends when i dial the pound sign (#) but i cant figure out how to do it something like exten = _*21*.# ; but this doesn't work, after i dial # it still waits a few seconds ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] number that starts with star on PAP2
We have some extensions in our dialplan that start with a star. We can dial them from Zap phones and SIP phones, but not from phones connected to a PAP2. After the user presses star follwed by two digits (our extensions are dialed with star followed by three digits) he hears a fast-busy that comes from the PAP2, not from Asterisk. This also happens with the builtin *8 (call pickup). In the PAP2's setup there are all of these Vertical Service Activation Codes that start with star and Outbound Call Codec Selection Codes, also the setup menu is accessed by pressing star four times, could they be intefering with dialing numbers that start with a star? And is there any way to get *8 and *XXX to dial? thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Internet exposed asterisk server.
Hi. I have a soft phone (X-Lite) which registers with a asterisk server that can only be accessible once we have some virtual private network software up and running. With the above scenario everything works fine. In the mean time the asterisk server was exposed to the internet, thus the virtual private network software is no longer needed. But when I try and register it gives me the following: Registration from 'User sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for 'yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy' - Wrong password Were xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the internal ip of the asterisk server, not the ip the external ip (the ip on the internet) and were yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is my external ip address as seen on the internet. I trippled check all the authentication details. Why is it not working on the exposed server? Did I do something wrong? Is there special confugurations when exposing an asterisk server? Thanks in advance. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Meetme from MySQL
Hi List, Is it possible to store meetme config in a MySQL table? If so, any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks Chris -- Chris Blunt Entropy IT Ltd ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: meetme conference latency degrades...
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Stenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a known problem and it does not matter what zaptel timer you use. A solution is available in 'svn head' by using asterisk.conf internal_timing = yes OR Enable internal timing support (-I) on the command line. I don't know if this has been backported to the stable branch. It hasn't, specifically, but the required changes are not large, and it is easy to apply the changes by hand; I do. Go to http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5374 and download the last asynchronous patch, 2005-10-04-3-asynchronous.patch Then apply it by hand to channel.c, and also to app_milliwatt.c and app_sms.c if you happen to be using those applications. I don't think the app_chanspy.c patch is required any more. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] RE: meetme conference latency degrades...
I think you need to upgrade to the latest Asterisk. Your version is pretty ancient. We are using v1.0.8 - Original Message - From: Michael George [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:48 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] meetme conference latency degrades... We have recently started making more frequent use of the meetme conference of our * system. We are using v1.0.8 with a 2.6.11 kernel on our system. We generally have 4 callers in it: two with the gsm codec and 2 with g729. Initially, the conference works fine and there is little latency. After about 15min., though, the latency is very noticable and by 25min it's unbearable. If we all leave the conference and return, the latency is unnoticable again. The load on the box is minimal, and only our meetme is running most of the time. Checking system load with top shows 0.1 or less. We have no digium hardware and use ztdummy for our timing device. zttest yields results generally in the area of 99.96%, but about 3-4% will be as low as 95%. In much smaller systems with Digium hardware, the accuracy is never below 99.98% and is often 100%. Is this apparent inaccuracy of the ztdummy timer likely the cause of the increasing latency in our meetme conference? Is there any way to improve it? Thank you, in advance, for any help. -- -M ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support?
I assume you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISAC but maybe you are referring to one of the controller chips on BRI adapters? James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trond G. Andersen Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 20:19 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support? Hi All. Has there been done any work to support ISAC ? Thanks, trond ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320 and asterisk 1.07bristuffed
Title: Messaggio Under Advanced make sure this is set: Call join on Xfer (2 calls): to off From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tommaso Calosi Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:02 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Unwanted conference with snom320 and asterisk 1.07bristuffed Ihave 13 Snom 320 with asterisk 1.07 bristuffed. The problem is that sometimes on random basis, when one customer is placed on hold and another call arrives, the customers are put in conference with each other. This look very strange to me, but I've disabled the confernce button on the snom phones to prevent the human errors, but it still occurs. Investigating I've discovered that a similar problem was fixed with the Snom320 Release 5.2 (http://www.snom.com/snom320_release_notes.html ) It says: fixed unwanted conference bug in offhook/enter during ringback with an incoming call BUT my phones are already running 5.2 firmware. Any idea? Am I the only one with this problem? Do you think is the usual buggy-snom firmware problem? Or it might be an Asterisk problem? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
If you have both sides of the call it is possible. It may not be practical though. If one side was using spandsp then it is both possible and practical. Craig - Original Message - From: Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:02 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file? Maybe if you had the un-muxed sending side but I really have no idea. Interesting question though. -Original Message- From: Alexander Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 5/3/2006 9:32 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file? This is a very KGB / NSA / InterPOL / CIA type question, but if I have a recorded file (G.711, no compression) can I feed it into standard in of an application and have it recreate the fax that was send? I don’t know enough about the Fax handshaking to understand this. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] PCI voltage
Hi all, I have to bought a PCI with 4 PRI but on digium site I saw that there a re two different kind (3,3V and 5v). Whats the difference? Which one I have to buy for do not have any problem with this motherboard? (Gygabyte GA-8S661FXM-775). I checked on Gigabyte website but I dont find any kind of this value K Thanks all Giordano ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: hyperthreading and zaptel
cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0:422 0 0 46196367IO-APIC-edge timer 8: 0 0 0155IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 14: 414685 0 0241IO-APIC-edge ide0 169: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd 177: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd 185: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd 193: 0 0 0 2105 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd 201: 61965 0 0 4612 IO-APIC-level megaraid 209: 0 0 0 46015177 IO-APIC-level wct4xxp 217: 399933 0 0333 IO-APIC-level eth0 NMI: 46196423 46196379 46196377 46196376 LOC: 46196579 46196300 46196579 46196294 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 The Interrupt addresses were the same with and without hyperthreading, just the number of CPUs was two. Mark suggested that the binaries might have been HT optimized. I did a quick search of the code and didn't find anything, but I am not exactly sure what the keyword might be for that. I did recompile and install zaptel with hyperhtreading off (with no success) and that is the build I am using with it back on now. -- -- Steven http://www.glimasoutheast.org James Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Turning on hyperthreading may have changed the way interrupts are routed. Were you using the same kernel (eg SMP kernel even with hyperthreading disabled)? The BIOS may have configured things differently too if you disabled it there. I'm not sure, but you may be able to keep hyperthreading on in the BIOS and boot into a UP kernel and have the same net effect as having ht disabled. You mention you have looked at /proc/interrupts, are there any differences between the interrupt numbers assigned in the ht enabled and ht disabled cases? When the kernel boots, it dumps some info about IRQ routing, compare those. Maybe post /proc/interrupts and the relevant bits of the kernel boot logs here if you aren't sure, someone might be able to spot something out of the ordinary. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 09:18 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] hyperthreading and zaptel My Dell 2800 Dual 64bit Proc. machine came in with hyperthreading enabled. (they call it virtual processor??) I have been intending for a month to disable it. Tonight, I rebooted, turned it off, and let the system come up. zaptel loaded and asterisk loaded, but both of my t1s were red. (it is a TE411P) /proc/interrupts looked OK, zttest gave OK numbers. I doublechecked all of the files in case I changed something else accidentally. I tried various combinations of unloading, loading the modules and ztcfg, etc. Finally, I decided to turn hyperthreading back on, and everything is back to normal. Unless there is somewhere in CentOS 4.3 that has the processor count hardcoded from the install, I am baffled by this. -- -- Steven http://www.glimasoutheast.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] PCI voltage
5 volt will be for desktop class motherboards and 3.3v for server class.See http://www.digium.com/en/docs/misc/pci_slot.phpRob On 04/05/06, Giordano Grandis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have to bought a PCI with 4 PRI but on digium site I saw that there a re two different kind (3,3V and 5v). What's the difference? Which one I have to buy for do not have any problem with this motherboard? (Gygabyte GA-8S661FXM-775). I checked on Gigabyte website but I don't find any kind of this value K Thanks all Giordano ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] web meetme instructions
Hi,what about the web meetme sourceforge project?Has it been approved?benq ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Developping SoftPhone
Hello, I would like to use an ocx for integrated a softphone in an existant program developped in Windev (from PC Soft). I try IaxClientOCx, but nothing happen at initialising. Then, I try some softphone make with it, it doesn't function either... Do you know any other OCX for try? Best regards, Olivier S. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QSIG support in Asterisk
2006/5/3, Asterisk User [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does Asterisk support QSIG SIP Tunneling or QSIG SIP Interworking? Do you mean something like ECMA 336 ?http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-336.pdfRegards ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QSIG support in Asterisk
2006/5/3, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+zapata.conf I've made some tests using this in Portugal and seems to work:--- switchtype=qsig ; you may try this in your zapata.conf--I suppose you are using PRI access.But i've also red that qsig is not fully compliant in Asterisk. I've found some PRI states not recognized in asterisk sending CAUSECODE=98 to my legaccy PBX when it seems to me that Asterisk should handle it... Any ways it seems to work in a standardt architecture:PSTN--E1---LegacyPBX---QSIG---AsteriskI hope it helps,Marco MoutaFor curiosity, what sort of benefit were you after using QSIG ? Most vendors tout SIP as interoperability protocol.Did you use QSIG as a way, for instance, to provide Message Waiting Indicator to digital phones ?Cheers ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SpeedDial on GXP-2000
How can you store pauses in speed dials for the GXP-2000? I used something like 8005551212,,,1,7890 to dial the toll free number, wait 6 seconds (I'm used to the commas being a 2 second delay), pressing 1, waiting 2 more seconds and then entering 7890. However, when I press the speeddial button, the phone freezes. Thanks, Waldo ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
2006/5/4, Craig Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you have both sides of the call it is possible.It may not be practicalthough.If one side was using spandsp then it is both possible andpractical.CraigCould you elaborate ? And if a fax is recorded with Asterisk voicemail application (in case an error in fax detection occurred), would it still be possible and pratical ?Regards ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 - Disable DND feature?
Attribute Values Default Interpretation call.rejectBusyOnDnd 0, 1 1 If set to 1, reject all incoming calls with the reason “busy” if do-not-disturb is enabled. Have not used, but looks like it may ignore the key if this is 0Let us know...On May 4, 2006, at 2:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,Is it possible to disable the DND feature on a Polycom 501?Regards,Jan___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
snip This is a very KGB / NSA / InterPOL / CIA type question, but if I have a recorded file (G.711, no compression) can I feed it into standard in of an application and have it recreate the fax that was send? /snip What is the specific reason as to why you want to record it to a file and send it out. When you need to send it to two people why not just send two faxes ? What am I missing ? Dovid __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support?
Yes, sorry I was wondering if anyone is working on ISAC voice codec I have seen a patch http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-commits/2006-February/001461. html But not seen anything anywhere else... trond I assume you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISAC but maybe you are referring to one of the controller chips on BRI adapters? James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trond G. Andersen Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 20:19 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support? Hi All. Has there been done any work to support ISAC ? Thanks, trond ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QSIG support in Asterisk
QSIG was just the protocol communication between Legaccy PBX and Asterisk.My users connect to Asterisk through SIPOn 5/4/06, Olivier Krief [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/5/3, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+zapata.conf I've made some tests using this in Portugal and seems to work:--- switchtype=qsig ; you may try this in your zapata.conf--I suppose you are using PRI access.But i've also red that qsig is not fully compliant in Asterisk. I've found some PRI states not recognized in asterisk sending CAUSECODE=98 to my legaccy PBX when it seems to me that Asterisk should handle it... Any ways it seems to work in a standardt architecture:PSTN--E1---LegacyPBX---QSIG---AsteriskI hope it helps,Marco Mouta For curiosity, what sort of benefit were you after using QSIG ? Most vendors tout SIP as interoperability protocol.Did you use QSIG as a way, for instance, to provide Message Waiting Indicator to digital phones ?Cheers ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
SV: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 - Disable DND feature?
Well, yes and no. I tested that before and it causes a silent ring instead of a call rejection. I actually want to disable the entire feature. So the phone always rings unless you're actually on the phone. Thanks for the reply though! Regards,Jan Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jerry JonesSkickat: den 4 maj 2006 15:00Till: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionÄmne: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 - Disable DND feature? Attribute Values Default Interpretation call.rejectBusyOnDnd 0, 1 1 If set to 1, reject all incoming calls with the reason busy if do-not-disturb is enabled. Have not used, but looks like it may ignore the key if this is 0 Let us know... On May 4, 2006, at 2:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is it possible to disable the DND feature on a Polycom 501? Regards, Jan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] number that starts with star on PAP2
In the PAP2's setup there are all of these Vertical Service Activation Codes that start with star and Outbound Call Codec Selection Codes, also the setup menu is accessed by pressing star four times, could they be intefering with dialing numbers that start with a star? And is there any way to get *8 and *XXX to dial? Why I did to mine is modify all the internal Vertical Service Activation Codes to be **x instead of *x. There is probably a better way, but this worked for me. hth ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
I have a client that 'NEEDS' (his words not mine) to make sure that all faxes, emails, calls, and mail are archived. Phone and email are simple, Mail depends upon the integrity of the mail room, Faxes however can be sent from anyone. They would like this as they recently had an issue with a fax sent. Client claims that the fax received was NOT the Fax sent. In the client file, the correct fax is there, but client attests to a different copy. (Client is always right) I know that I can use HylaFax and a custom context to grab the 'dialed' number receive the fax via HylaFax and 're-send' it out again. But I have not had the success rate I would like with HylaFax/IAXmodem. However, recording a file in Asterisk is a simple and manageable concept. I do not expect problems with the recording load as there will be less than 10 recordings at once. I will NOT be mixing them and will be off-loading the tasks off to another machine after hours for processing, realtime archiving is not needed. They are also 'emotionally attached' to the rather large fax machines (Mopier) that they have. (4) They are a law firm that deals with rather large purchases, Planes, Boats( SHIPS!!), small island countries, etc. etc, They only have 3 attorneys and 3 para-legals, so they are difficult to change in their ways, I find larger orgs are less resilient to change. That's why.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 9:06 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file? snip This is a very KGB / NSA / InterPOL / CIA type question, but if I have a recorded file (G.711, no compression) can I feed it into standard in of an application and have it recreate the fax that was send? /snip What is the specific reason as to why you want to record it to a file and send it out. When you need to send it to two people why not just send two faxes ? What am I missing ? Dovid __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobile phones
Hi all, I am trying to detect DTMF keys from a mobile when asterisk make an outgoing call to the mobile. The DTMF detection on incoming calls (also FROM mobiles) is working very well. The only problem is if asterisk called the phone... Nothing is detected. I am using a digium te205p with PMX/PSTN connection. Everything that I can find in forums are problems with dtmf detection on SIP. Any suggestions? Cheers Marc ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobile phones
From my recent problem on this sort of thing, I'd suggest you set the timeout to around 1500ms in the feature.conf file. This is of course if your using the DTMF digit's to activate any of the features. also make the devices both sides of the call are using the same DTMF mode. Mark Hi all, I am trying to detect DTMF keys from a mobile when asterisk make an outgoing call to the mobile. The DTMF detection on incoming calls (also FROM mobiles) is working very well. The only problem is if asterisk called the phone... Nothing is detected. I am using a digium te205p with PMX/PSTN connection. Everything that I can find in forums are problems with dtmf detection on SIP. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobile phones
Marc Scheuffler wrote: Hi all, I am trying to detect DTMF keys from a mobile when asterisk make an outgoing call to the mobile. The DTMF detection on incoming calls (also FROM mobiles) is working very well. The only problem is if asterisk called the phone... Nothing is detected. I am using a digium te205p with PMX/PSTN connection. Everything that I can find in forums are problems with dtmf detection on SIP. Any suggestions? Can you hear DTMF tones from the cellphone when you call it? It is possible they are not produced. I'm not sure if that is a handset or network issue, but I had this happen a few years ago when implementing an IVR that called subscribers for notification, and expected input from them. Most of the time it worked, but some phones in some locations sent nothing. If the phone made a call from the same location there was no problem. Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
AW: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobilephones
Yes I can hear the DTMF keys. I ve tried 2 different phones and 3 different mobile network providers. Nothing. I played with the rx/txgain values from hearing nothing to too loud... I have no more ideas. Marc -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Steve Underwood Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2006 17:00 An: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Betreff: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobilephones Marc Scheuffler wrote: Hi all, I am trying to detect DTMF keys from a mobile when asterisk make an outgoing call to the mobile. The DTMF detection on incoming calls (also FROM mobiles) is working very well. The only problem is if asterisk called the phone... Nothing is detected. I am using a digium te205p with PMX/PSTN connection. Everything that I can find in forums are problems with dtmf detection on SIP. Any suggestions? Can you hear DTMF tones from the cellphone when you call it? It is possible they are not produced. I'm not sure if that is a handset or network issue, but I had this happen a few years ago when implementing an IVR that called subscribers for notification, and expected input from them. Most of the time it worked, but some phones in some locations sent nothing. If the phone made a call from the same location there was no problem. Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] disa and caller id
Before I go nuts trying to figure this out, is anyone using DISA in this manner? exten = s,1,DISA(X|context|callerid) Everything works except the caller ID part. What I had wanted to do is to setup up a file of authorization codes where each code was associated with a context and caller id. The format for the file, I thought would be: |context|callerid and I had it set up in extensions.conf for: exten = s,1,DISA(/etc/asterisk/disa.conf) However, neither method seems to pass the caller ID. And, yes, I am able to set my own caller ID. I can set it before the dial command and it works. Otherwise, no caller ID is sent. I just want to confirm that someone is using this and it is working for them. If that's the case, then I know it is somewhere in my setup. If no one else has been able to get it to work, then it may not work correctly to begin with. I'm using the latest stable version 1.2.7.1.-- Lacy MooreAspendora, Inc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
AW: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobilephones
Yapp, timeout is set to 1500ms. What kind of dtmf mode? As far as i know there are just 2. Relaxdtmf yes or no Or am I wrong? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Mark Ackroyd Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2006 16:52 An: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Betreff: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF detection when outgoing call to mobilephones From my recent problem on this sort of thing, I'd suggest you set the timeout to around 1500ms in the feature.conf file. This is of course if your using the DTMF digit's to activate any of the features. also make the devices both sides of the call are using the same DTMF mode. Mark Hi all, I am trying to detect DTMF keys from a mobile when asterisk make an outgoing call to the mobile. The DTMF detection on incoming calls (also FROM mobiles) is working very well. The only problem is if asterisk called the phone... Nothing is detected. I am using a digium te205p with PMX/PSTN connection. Everything that I can find in forums are problems with dtmf detection on SIP. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] number that starts with star on PAP2
In the PAP2's setup there are all of these "Vertical Service Activation Codes" that start with star and "Outbound Call Codec Selection Codes", also the setup menu is accessed by pressing star four times, could they be intefering with dialing numbers that start with a star? And is there any way to get *8 and *XXX to dial? Yes - that's your problem. You need to porgram the dialpan in the PAP2 appropriately, disable functions you don't want, etc.p New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet Problem?
Just wanted to add my 2 cents. We were with voipjet, and do still use them for occassional backup.However, their lack of personal service and inability to get ahold of someone drove us away.After several total blackouts (like what happened yesterday), and no responce we finally put out an SOS on the asterisk mailing list. Of course there were several responces from companies trying to solicit us. but the one that caught our attention was calleveryone.com So far we have been rock-solid-happy with them. We've had a few small bumps along the road. For instance, once there was a router along our path to them that was dropping packets, but this was quickly resolved. Additionally, they've worked with us on the phone to resolve audio problems, and diagnose carrier issues. If I have a problem, I rest assured that I can call someone, or page someone if the situation is severe enough, and get ahold of a human at any hour of the evening. Not so with VoipJet. I don't want to bad mouth VoipJet, their service is decent... but definately not acceptable for a carrier grade level. I'm not affiiliated with calleveryone in any way other then a very happy and satisfied customer, and would highly recommend them to you. If you are a wholesole buyer of minutes, talk to them, don't just take their prices on the main page... those are for residential and regular customers. Their prices are very comparable to voipjet, and the service is miles ahead. On 5/3/06, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup... I think they died... this is why I stopped using them except as my backup. It seems 64.34.45.100 is working ok as of right now. It wouldn't be so bad if they had a number you could call for support! HERE THAT JOHN? You need a phone number if you want to play with the big dogs. On 5/3/06, Mark Hulber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I started to have a problem today that all my calls through voipjet result in just timing out after my assigned timeout period. I tried multiple of their servers with the same problem. Anyone else having a problem? I am running: Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r24381M built by root @ asterisk.hulber.com on a i686 running Linux on 2006-05-03 14:14:07 UTC I can connect with other IAX providers. MARK. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREACHABLE?
I've got this low-ping 100%-up dsl connection between two asterisk 1.2.7.1 servers. And oftentimes one of them would declare its opposite UNREACHABLE. Why can this happen? The host stanzas in iax.conf have raw IP's, so no DNS monkey business here.. An inquiring mind wants to know. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Auto Logout from queue
I have tried using the autologoff in the agents.conf and it sort of works. I set it to 5 seconds to test it and it has taken anywhere from 35 to 60 seconds to actually do something at which point it does indeed log out the agent. I don't want to be pestering agents with test calls to see if they are indeed there so the below scripting isn't really practical in our environment. Can anyone tell me why the agents.conf file setting doesn't work as described? If it is set to 5 it should log them off after 5 seconds or so not 30 - 60 seconds. I don't really want the call sitting at a logged out agents phone for anymore then 5 seconds when there are other agents out there waiting to take that call. Any ideas? Thanks _ Kevin Savoy Business Unit Telecom Analyst 2218 4th Ave W Williston, ND 58801 Ph: 701-774-4023 Fax: 701-774-2901 http://www.novo1.com Novo 1 is a service mark of Novo 1, Inc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alberto Sagredo Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:22 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Auto Logout from queue Via dialplan maybe? exten = xxx,1,Dial(SIP/101_Queue,20,tr) exten =xxx,2,RemoveQueueMember(Comercial_Queue,SIP/101_Queue,1) Kerry Garrison escribió: Yes, that is the functionality I am looking for, just not sure how exactly to pull that off. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:08 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Auto Logout from queue Use the local channel to call the agent first, and if there is no answer, log them out. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kerry Garrison Sent: Tue 4/25/2006 2:38 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Auto Logout from queue i have a client that wants a function that will automatically logout an agent from a queue if they do not answer a call. This would prevent future calls from being sent to that phone if the agent forgot to logout. Any ideas? Kerry Garrison Director of Technical Services Tech Data Pros - Orange County's Mobile IT Service Provider (949) 502-7819 x200 - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.techdatapros.com/ http://www.techdatapros.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Why not capture the faxes (in or out) in tiff format, instead of audio format? Setup your asterisk box to relay faxes! MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:07 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file? I have a client that 'NEEDS' (his words not mine) to make sure that all faxes, emails, calls, and mail are archived. Phone and email are simple, Mail depends upon the integrity of the mail room, Faxes however can be sent from anyone. They would like this as they recently had an issue with a fax sent. Client claims that the fax received was NOT the Fax sent. In the client file, the correct fax is there, but client attests to a different copy. (Client is always right) I know that I can use HylaFax and a custom context to grab the 'dialed' number receive the fax via HylaFax and 're-send' it out again. But I have not had the success rate I would like with HylaFax/IAXmodem. However, recording a file in Asterisk is a simple and manageable concept. I do not expect problems with the recording load as there will be less than 10 recordings at once. I will NOT be mixing them and will be off-loading the tasks off to another machine after hours for processing, realtime archiving is not needed. They are also 'emotionally attached' to the rather large fax machines (Mopier) that they have. (4) They are a law firm that deals with rather large purchases, Planes, Boats( SHIPS!!), small island countries, etc. etc, They only have 3 attorneys and 3 para-legals, so they are difficult to change in their ways, I find larger orgs are less resilient to change. That's why.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 9:06 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file? snip This is a very KGB / NSA / InterPOL / CIA type question, but if I have a recorded file (G.711, no compression) can I feed it into standard in of an application and have it recreate the fax that was send? /snip What is the specific reason as to why you want to record it to a file and send it out. When you need to send it to two people why not just send two faxes ? What am I missing ? Dovid __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREACHABLE?
On Thursday 04 May 2006 11:31, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: I've got this low-ping 100%-up dsl connection between two asterisk 1.2.7.1 servers. And oftentimes one of them would declare its opposite UNREACHABLE. I see this happen on occasion as well -- same type of setup here, static IPs, no DNS, route seems just fine. I even have qualify smoothing turned on, because I thought that the odd UDP packet would just get lost and cause this, but that doesn't seem to help at all. This occurs with every version of Asterisk I've used (svn trunk), including the latest checkout in late April. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] remapping sof-keys on Polcyom 301
Hi, Did anybody succeed remapping soft-keys on polycom 301 ? I am having some problems with it. I was trying to remap Transfer button as the first option while being in a call. It works but The name of the soft key is still HOLD and while I am not in a call I see button NewCall that suddenly stopped working... nothing happens when you press it. This is out of my cfg: keys key.scrolling.timeout=1 key.IP_300.28.function.prim=Transfer/ Bartosz ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] web meetme instructions
It has been approved. We started out trying to use CVS on SourceForge, but it appears that there have been major issues with CVS, so we just switched to SVN. We need to checkin a baseline, and start integrating patches. Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben QSent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:33 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] web meetme instructions Hi,what about the web meetme sourceforge project?Has it been approved?benq ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support?
No. iSAC is a codec from GIPS. Likely the coded used by Skype. Michael On Thu, 4 May 2006 21:35:07 +1000, James Harper wrote: I assume you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISAC but maybe you are referring to one of the controller chips on BRI adapters? James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trond G. Andersen Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 20:19 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support? Hi All. Has there been done any work to support ISAC ? Thanks, trond ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] o713-861-4005 o800-905-6412 c713-201-1262 fwd 54245 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Why not capture the faxes (in or out) in tiff format, instead of audio format? Setup your asterisk box to relay faxes! I think in this case the impact on the client would be much greater if you can show them a recreation of the image from the raw data; you could always claim that a TIFF file was altered (which it can be, trivially) but it's pretty much impossible to change the raw audio to your ends unless you are in a Tom Clancy novel. I'm watching this thread closely because where I work there's a lot of he-said, she-said over faxes too. If anyone can work out an example with SpanDSP, please share with the class! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREACHABLE?
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Thursday 04 May 2006 11:31, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: I've got this low-ping 100%-up dsl connection between two asterisk 1.2.7.1 servers. And oftentimes one of them would declare its opposite UNREACHABLE. Same, here, two asterisk 1.2.7.1 boxes connected to the same switch... Over a week I see at least one case of one of the boxes becoming unavailable for the other... simple iax2 reload fixes the problem. Been like this for ages. just my 2 cents, Vahan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Colin Anderson wrote: Why not capture the faxes (in or out) in tiff format, instead of audio format? Setup your asterisk box to relay faxes! I think in this case the impact on the client would be much greater if you can show them a recreation of the image from the raw data; you could always claim that a TIFF file was altered (which it can be, trivially) but it's pretty much impossible to change the raw audio to your ends unless you are in a Tom Clancy novel. I'm watching this thread closely because where I work there's a lot of he-said, she-said over faxes too. If anyone can work out an example with SpanDSP, please share with the class! I would have no problem decoding a FAX, doctoring the images, then creating modified audio from them. During decoding, the FAX modems produce a channel estimate, so reproducing the characteristics of the original audio path wouldn't be hard. I think it would be pretty easy to create fresh audio that no expert could dispute as possibly being the original. Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Soonr
http://www.soonr.com/web/front/features.jsp Just saw this on the Always On Top 100 webcast (if you arent familiar click the url below) http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/always-on-awards-top-100-of-2006.html Soonr looks like it rocks, havent tried it yet. Cheers, Dean ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] OT: D-link DI-102
Anyone use this thing? http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=426 The fab sheet is totally useless for tech info. How does it work? By ToS? Port number? Is it programmable? Can I prioritize an arbitrary port or ToS bit? tia ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QSIG support in Asterisk
I am trying to use QSIG to interoperate with legacy PBXs. I am looking to see whether any one knows whether Call Hold, Call Transfer, MWI works with QSIG support in Asterisk. Thanks in advance. --Pillai On 5/4/06, Olivier Krief [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/5/3, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+zapata.conf I've made some tests using this in Portugal and seems to work:--- switchtype=qsig ; you may try this in your zapata.conf --I suppose you are using PRI access.But i've also red that qsig is not fully compliant in Asterisk. I've found some PRI states not recognized in asterisk sending CAUSECODE=98 to my legaccy PBX when it seems to me that Asterisk should handle it... Any ways it seems to work in a standardt architecture:PSTN--E1---LegacyPBX---QSIG---AsteriskI hope it helps,Marco Mouta For curiosity, what sort of benefit were you after using QSIG ? Most vendors tout SIP as interoperability protocol.Did you use QSIG as a way, for instance, to provide Message Waiting Indicator to digital phones ? Cheers___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Phones behind dynamic IPs
'recognize'? The phone cannot know that the external IP has been changed, unless it is using a STUN server and periodically re-doing the STUN queries (which I doubt any phones do). Thanks for clearing up my misunderstanding as to the point of STUN. :-) I thought the phone would query the STUN server at regular intervals to see if the IP had changed. Okay, so assuming I've got to drop the re-registration to a much shorter time than the default of every hour, what are the implications of doing so (in terms of network traffic, load on the asterisk box, etc.)? What's the lowest one can reasonably take it? 10 minutes? 1 minute? Thanks again. Regards, Chris -- C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited This email is made from 100% recycled electrons ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
I would have no problem decoding a FAX, doctoring the images, then creating modified audio from them. During decoding, the FAX modems produce a channel estimate, so reproducing the characteristics of the original audio path wouldn't be hard. I think it would be pretty easy to create fresh audio that no expert could dispute as possibly being the original. Ya, but...You Da Man. I mean doctoring fax audio so that mere mortals can comprehend how to do it. I swear there's an i960 in your head so you can listen to an audio stream and compose the TIFF in your mind. :-) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TE410P T400P together in a server
Can I mix these in a single system... having problems getting the tor2 driver or the wct4xxp drivers to load, although they seem fine if alone in the system. span=1,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=1-23dchan=24 span=2,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=25-47dchan=48 span=3,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=49-71dchan=72 span=4,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=73-95dchan=96 span=5,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=97-119dchan=120 span=6,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=121-143dchan=144 span=7,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=145-167dchan=168 span=8,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=169-191dchan=192 loadzone=usdefaultzone=us ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
On Thursday 04 May 2006 14:08, Steve Underwood wrote: I would have no problem decoding a FAX, doctoring the images, then creating modified audio from them. During decoding, the FAX modems produce a channel estimate, so reproducing the characteristics of the original audio path wouldn't be hard. I think it would be pretty easy to create fresh audio that no expert could dispute as possibly being the original. Yes, but nobody disputes your godlike status with the software DSP. :-) -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files?-- Bruce Nortex Networks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Colin Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why not capture the faxes (in or out) in tiff format, instead of audio format? Setup your asterisk box to relay faxes! I think in this case the impact on the client would be much greater if you can show them a recreation of the image from the raw data; you could always claim that a TIFF file was altered (which it can be, trivially) but it's pretty much impossible to change the raw audio to your ends unless you are in a Tom Clancy novel. Why is this hard to fake at all? You send a different fax to your system, and replace the Asterisk audio file with the one from the altered fax. Additionally, the client has no realistic way of verifying the correctness of your audio-to-fax translation tool; it could just as easily output a TIFF file completely different from the one that was actually faxed. Scott. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Realtime rtignoreexpire bugged ??
All, this doesn't appear normal to me, it appears as if ast is ignoring the itignoreexpire variable. sip.conf snippet: rtignoreexpire=yes asterisk -r CLIsip show settings --snip-- Ignore Reg. Expire: No --snip-- Does this look like a problem? :-) Thanks, Matt ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Switchboard solutions, interactions with handset
Hi there, I'm looking into developing an in-house switchboard application. Does anyone here know of a way to control a hard-phone from such an application. For example, the attendant forwards a call with another one in queue. Once the first call has been forwarded (by keyboard shortcuts or dragging-n-dropping) - she presses a button (on the computer) to answer the waiting call. Now, if the switchboard application embeds a soft-phone, I can figure out how to do this. But suppose the attendant is using a hard-phone (since it's more reliable) with a headset - can she do the above things without having to press any of the phones buttons? Wouldn't this require the application to somehow control if the phone is off-hook or on-hook? Is there some other way I'm not seeing and/or has someone here implemented similar stuff? Could I possibly keep an open channel in Asterisk to the attendants phone, and bridge that with whatever channel requested by the switchboard application? I have found some mention of this, bridging channels, in the mailing list archives, but not in the AMI documentation. Is this maybe something that's still only on the svn trunk? thanks, Arnar ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
On Thursday 04 May 2006 14:45, Bruce Reeves wrote: I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files? You can do this relatively easily with Perl. There is a script somewhere that will take your sip.conf and generate phone[exten].cfg files, but it knows nothing about MAC addresses and as such will not generate the [MACADDRESS].cfg files. Again though, this isn't too tricky to do. A few hours' worth of work. The tricky part would be making sure you got the right phone to the right desk if the extension #s are physically important. :-) If you need some help with the script I am available for consulting. Contact me offlist if this is something you'd like to discuss. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Why is this hard to fake at all? You send a different fax to your system, and replace the Asterisk audio file with the one from the altered fax. Additionally, the client has no realistic way of verifying the correctness of your audio-to-fax translation tool; it could just as easily output a TIFF file completely different from the one that was actually faxed. That's interesting, I hadn't thought of it that way. I was thinking in terms of subtly modifying the original audio stream not outright replacing the recording and faking the datestamp! Given that, essentially recording the audio is the *same* as retaining the TIFF in terms of integrity vulnerability. How about this: (theoretical of course) 1. Fax comes in 2. Audio is recorded 3. A checksum of the audio is generated then relayed somehow to a seperate, secure system 4. In the event of a dispute, the checksum is retrieved, compared with the original audio file, then the original audio is replayed and the fax is regenerated. The 3. part I leave as an exercise for the reader. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
Try this one: http://www.freedomphones.net/polycom/files/polycom.phone1cfg.pl-script Sean Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Thursday 04 May 2006 14:45, Bruce Reeves wrote: I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files? You can do this relatively easily with Perl. There is a script somewhere that will take your sip.conf and generate phone[exten].cfg files, but it knows nothing about MAC addresses and as such will not generate the [MACADDRESS].cfg files. Again though, this isn't too tricky to do. A few hours' worth of work. The tricky part would be making sure you got the right phone to the right desk if the extension #s are physically important. :-) If you need some help with the script I am available for consulting. Contact me offlist if this is something you'd like to discuss. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
Something I made might help. http://www.horanappraisals.com/asterisk/polycom_addphone/ -- there is a script, addphone, and a folder called defaults that contains the templates. To use, I put the defaults folder and its contents and the addphone script in my ftp or tftp root. I would make sure that phoneX.cfg contains the proper reg password. and make sure -directory.xml contains the global dir you want all phones to begin with. Then, from the (t)ftp root, run addone macaddress extension display_name i.e.: addone 001122334455 110 Mojo the results of this would be: Creating 001122334455.cfg to point to extension 110 Creating phone110.cfg for extension 110, DisplayName Mojo, to point to mac address 001122334455 Creating 001122334455-directory.xml from default company directory Done! Any questions feel free to ask me off-list. Moj Bruce Reeves wrote: I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files? -- Bruce Nortex Networks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office Manger, Horan Company, LLC (907) 747- x112 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
Hi Bruce, We've written software to do this as a service for our customers. I can't give you the program, but we'd be willing to program your phones for you. Contact me off list. Michael Crown Managing Partner www.thevoipconnection.com 321.989.6728 ext. 611 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Bruce Reeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:45 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files?-- Bruce Nortex Networks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet Problem?
Hard to believe you arent associated with calleveryone.com as I find it hard to believe that you would be extolling the virtues on one of, if not the most expensive companies around. $7 a month plus 3.9 cents a minute domestic, that's pretty much double the cost of anyone else. Customer service may be stellar but when clients are actually trying to save money, that's a damned hard sell. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet Problem? Just wanted to add my 2 cents. We were with voipjet, and do still use them for occassional backup.However, their lack of personal service and inability to get ahold of someone drove us away.After several total blackouts (like what happened yesterday), and no responce we finally put out an SOS on the asterisk mailing list. Of course there were several responces from companies trying to solicit us. but the one that caught our attention was calleveryone.com So far we have been rock-solid-happy with them. We've had a few small bumps along the road. For instance, once there was a router along our path to them that was dropping packets, but this was quickly resolved. Additionally, they've worked with us on the phone to resolve audio problems, and diagnose carrier issues. If I have a problem, I rest assured that I can call someone, or page someone if the situation is severe enough, and get ahold of a human at any hour of the evening. Not so with VoipJet. I don't want to bad mouth VoipJet, their service is decent... but definately not acceptable for a carrier grade level. I'm not affiiliated with calleveryone in any way other then a very happy and satisfied customer, and would highly recommend them to you. If you are a wholesole buyer of minutes, talk to them, don't just take their prices on the main page... those are for residential and regular customers. Their prices are very comparable to voipjet, and the service is miles ahead. On 5/3/06, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup... I think they died... this is why I stopped using them except as my backup. It seems 64.34.45.100 is working ok as of right now. It wouldn't be so bad if they had a number you could call for support! HERE THAT JOHN? You need a phone number if you want to play with the big dogs. On 5/3/06, Mark Hulber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I started to have a problem today that all my calls through voipjet result in just timing out after my assigned timeout period. I tried multiple of their servers with the same problem. Anyone else having a problem? I am running: Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r24381M built by root @ asterisk.hulber.com on a i686 running Linux on 2006-05-03 14:14:07 UTC I can connect with other IAX providers. MARK. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Sounds like a potential business opportunity. Someone could setup a fax proxy service that provides this sort of digital signing / archiving. The originator could simply dial a toll-free access number, receive a 2nd dialtone and then dial the destination. Meanwhile the proxy is recording the call, then decoding and allowing the archives to be viewed online along with all relevent call details. Hmm... Interesting. Josh McAllister -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Anderson Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:12 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file? Why is this hard to fake at all? You send a different fax to your system, and replace the Asterisk audio file with the one from the altered fax. Additionally, the client has no realistic way of verifying the correctness of your audio-to-fax translation tool; it could just as easily output a TIFF file completely different from the one that was actually faxed. That's interesting, I hadn't thought of it that way. I was thinking in terms of subtly modifying the original audio stream not outright replacing the recording and faking the datestamp! Given that, essentially recording the audio is the *same* as retaining the TIFF in terms of integrity vulnerability. How about this: (theoretical of course) 1. Fax comes in 2. Audio is recorded 3. A checksum of the audio is generated then relayed somehow to a seperate, secure system 4. In the event of a dispute, the checksum is retrieved, compared with the original audio file, then the original audio is replayed and the fax is regenerated. The 3. part I leave as an exercise for the reader. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
On Thursday 04 May 2006 15:18, Sean Cook wrote: http://www.freedomphones.net/polycom/files/polycom.phone1cfg.pl-script Yep that's the one that reads sip.conf and spits out phone[exten].cfg files. It does not tie in mac addresses nor generate [macaddress].cfg files, though. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Logout from queue
it is two scripts an empty_queue.sh and a fill_queue.sh and a members script If you need intructions please tell me1047 $ cat empty_queue.sh#!/bin/bash# a script to remove everyone in the members script located in the same directory as this file # to the Q 3901# can be called from a script#Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]#Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]#Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]for wild in `/usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x show queue 3901| grep -a dynamic | awk '{ print $1 }'`; do /usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x remove queue member $wild from 3901| grep -a interface; done1048 $ cat fill_queue.sh#!/bin/bash# a script to add everyone in the members script located in the same directory as this file # to the Q 3901# can be called from a script#Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]#Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]#Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]for wild in `cat /home/cmayfield/members `; do /usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x add queue member $wild to 3901| grep -a interface; done1049 $ cat membersLocal/[EMAIL PROTECTED]Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]1050 $ crontab -l#at 8:1 and 8:11 it will fill the queue and it is nondistructive1,11 8 * * 1-5 sh /home/cmayfield/fill_queue.sh | mail -s fill_queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]#at 5:31 and 5:36 it will empty the queue and it is nondistructive31,36 17 * * 1-5 sh /home/cmayfield/empty_queue.sh | mail -s empty_queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]On 5/2/06, Tomislav Parčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... that is a nice function I use a cronjob to logout everyone each evening if anyone wants that script I would love to provide it.Please send the script to the list.--Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers SplitStinice 12, 21000 SplitTel.: +385(21)495148SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]e-mail: tparcina#lama.hrhttp://www.lama.hr ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- $15.95/Month DreamHost Hosting SALE 60 GB Disk Storage, 1.6 TB TransferTransfer Increases 16 GB Weeklyhttp://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?ap0ught/shared/Use discount code caralena for $40 off all these low prices ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can I recreate a Fax from a recorded file?
Colin Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why is this hard to fake at all? You send a different fax to your system, and replace the Asterisk audio file with the one from the altered fax. Additionally, the client has no realistic way of verifying the correctness of your audio-to-fax translation tool; it could just as easily output a TIFF file completely different from the one that was actually faxed. That's interesting, I hadn't thought of it that way. I was thinking in terms of subtly modifying the original audio stream not outright replacing the recording and faking the datestamp! Given that, essentially recording the audio is the *same* as retaining the TIFF in terms of integrity vulnerability. How about this: (theoretical of course) 1. Fax comes in 2. Audio is recorded 3. A checksum of the audio is generated then relayed somehow to a seperate, secure system 4. In the event of a dispute, the checksum is retrieved, compared with the original audio file, then the original audio is replayed and the fax is regenerated. I don't see the advantage to this; the client still has to trust that all of this is done correctly, and if they don't trust the fax recipient to put the correct fax in the paper file or keep the correct TIFF, why would they trust them to do this? Using a third party to receive and relay the fax, one which is trusted by both the client and the fax recipient, would solve the problem; the third party could create a document with the caller information (ideally from ANI, which is harder to forge), the time, and the message itself, then digitally sign it. This might even be an interesting business plan, for some applications where confirmed document transmittal is important. But it's hard for me to imagine this isn't overkill; if a client and a service provider distrust each other so thoroughly that they have to communicate through a third party to verify integrity, probably they just shouldn't do business with each other. Scott. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet Problem?
Kerry, You didn't read my entire e-mail. How do I know that? Because if you re-read it you'll see that I state: If you are a wholesole buyer of minutes, talk to them, don't just take their prices on the main page... those are for residential and regular customers. Their prices are very comparable to voipjet, and the service is miles ahead. If you are a regular residential customer just wanting to do talking $7 + 3.9cents/minute may very well be cheaper then your $50.00/month phone bill with Verizon, or BellSouth. However, commercial termination customers will get much better rates, and MUCH better service then voipjet provides. On 5/4/06, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hard to believe you arent associated with calleveryone.com as I find it hard to believe that you would be extolling the virtues on one of, if not the most expensive companies around. $7 a month plus 3.9 cents a minute domestic, that's pretty much double the cost of anyone else. Customer service may be stellar but when clients are actually trying to save money, that's a damned hard sell. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet Problem? Just wanted to add my 2 cents. We were with voipjet, and do still use them for occassional backup.However, their lack of personal service and inability to get ahold of someone drove us away.After several total blackouts (like what happened yesterday), and no responce we finally put out an SOS on the asterisk mailing list. Of course there were several responces from companies trying to solicit us. but the one that caught our attention was calleveryone.com So far we have been rock-solid-happy with them. We've had a few small bumps along the road. For instance, once there was a router along our path to them that was dropping packets, but this was quickly resolved. Additionally, they've worked with us on the phone to resolve audio problems, and diagnose carrier issues. If I have a problem, I rest assured that I can call someone, or page someone if the situation is severe enough, and get ahold of a human at any hour of the evening. Not so with VoipJet. I don't want to bad mouth VoipJet, their service is decent... but definately not acceptable for a carrier grade level. I'm not affiiliated with calleveryone in any way other then a very happy and satisfied customer, and would highly recommend them to you. If you are a wholesole buyer of minutes, talk to them, don't just take their prices on the main page... those are for residential and regular customers. Their prices are very comparable to voipjet, and the service is miles ahead. On 5/3/06, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup... I think they died... this is why I stopped using them except as my backup. It seems 64.34.45.100 is working ok as of right now. It wouldn't be so bad if they had a number you could call for support! HERE THAT JOHN? You need a phone number if you want to play with the big dogs. On 5/3/06, Mark Hulber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I started to have a problem today that all my calls through voipjet result in just timing out after my assigned timeout period. I tried multiple of their servers with the same problem. Anyone else having a problem? I am running: Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r24381M built by root @ asterisk.hulber.com on a i686 running Linux on 2006-05-03 14:14:07 UTC I can connect with other IAX providers. MARK. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Volume configuration on Polycom Soundpoint 501 phone
We are using the polycom 501 phones, and are having some challengeswith the volume setting. When a phone call comes in, the user ups thevolume for the handset, but they have to repeat that for every call.Currently, the volume level seems to reset itself at about 60%. Is there a way for the user to change their default volume level?Thanks-- Jim Freeze ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREACHABLE?
--- Vahan Yerkanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Thursday 04 May 2006 11:31, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: I've got this low-ping 100%-up dsl connection between two asterisk 1.2.7.1 servers. And oftentimes one of them would declare its opposite UNREACHABLE. Same, here, two asterisk 1.2.7.1 boxes connected to the same switch... Over a week I see at least one case of one of the boxes becoming unavailable for the other... simple iax2 reload fixes the problem. Been like this for ages. rant From this thread today I've learned that the problems I've been having the entire time I've been using asterisk (about two weeks) stem not from NAT, as I originally thought, but from asterisk itself, so that if I were to move my asterisk box to a public IP address, my iax2 connection to my PSTN originator (which also runs asterisk) would _still_ be unreliable. This makes iax2 on asterisk useless for receiving calls. No matter how many spiffy features asterisk has, there is one simple nonnegotiable requirement: it must always answer incoming calls. If it can't do that, then it can't be relied on. And over iax2, it can't do that. Isn't asterisk supposed to by default reregister iax2 connections every minute or something like that? Why then do I get reliable incoming connections for several hours, and then it dies, and I have to do a reload? Am I supposed to make a cron job to automatically tell asterisk to reload every so often, since iax2 likes to periodically die? Or maybe am I supposed to make a cron job to place a phone call every so often from an external phone into my asterisk system and verify that asterisk actually answers, and immediately issue asterisk a reload if it fails? This is utterly ridiculous. Yes, I know, it's free software and all, and you get what you pay for. Just in a bad mood today because I've literally lost thousands of dollars due to asterisk's failure to reliably answer incoming calls, and I only discover these failed incoming call attempts later when I check my PSTN originator's logs. I then go oh crap! and do a test call into my asterisk system, and get Ma Bell's the number you are calling has been disconnected or is no longer in use, and I issue a reload to asterisk and try again, and this time my call succeeds. At this rate soon it will be more profitable for me to just invest in a traditional reliable PBX hooked to Ma Bell and be done with these problems. I'm not a Digium customer, so they have no reason to listen to me, but surely there are Digium customers who are also getting bitten by this iax2 bug. Is anybody on this list actually using iax2 for anything mission-critical? /rant __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Logout from queue
Hrmmm. I thought there was already an option in the queue.conf or agents.conf file (Though can't remember off hand what) that would set an agent logged out or on 'pause' if they did not answer a call. No? On 5/4/06, Christopher Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it is two scripts an empty_queue.sh and a fill_queue.sh and a members script If you need intructions please tell me 1047 $ cat empty_queue.sh #!/bin/bash # a script to remove everyone in the members script located in the same directory as this file # to the Q 3901 # can be called from a script #Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for wild in `/usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x show queue 3901| grep -a dynamic | awk '{ print $1 }'`; do /usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x remove queue member $wild from 3901| grep -a interface; done 1048 $ cat fill_queue.sh #!/bin/bash # a script to add everyone in the members script located in the same directory as this file # to the Q 3901 # can be called from a script #Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for wild in `cat /home/cmayfield/members `; do /usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x add queue member $wild to 3901| grep -a interface; done 1049 $ cat members Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1050 $ crontab -l #at 8:1 and 8:11 it will fill the queue and it is nondistructive 1,11 8 * * 1-5 sh /home/cmayfield/fill_queue.sh | mail -s fill_queue [EMAIL PROTECTED] #at 5:31 and 5:36 it will empty the queue and it is nondistructive 31,3617 * * 1-5 sh /home/cmayfield/empty_queue.sh | mail -s empty_queue [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 5/2/06, Tomislav Parčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... that is a nice function I use a cronjob to logout everyone each evening if anyone wants that script I would love to provide it. Please send the script to the list. -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- $15.95/Month DreamHost Hosting SALE 60 GB Disk Storage, 1.6 TB Transfer Transfer Increases 16 GB Weekly http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?ap0ught/shared/ Use discount code caralena for $40 off all these low prices ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
Hi Bruce, We create a CSV file of our phone setup and then use shell scripts to parse them and generate mac-address.cfg, phone.cfg, sip.conf, voicemail.conf and entensions.conf entries. Contact me off list if you would like a copy now (they're not quite ready for prime-time yet) - the rest of you will have to wait until they're finished :-) but I do intend to release a bunch of monkey-level helpdesk scripts that I am working on in the near future for managing basic MAC requests. Regards, -- Anthony Rodgers Business Systems Analyst District of North Vancouver Web: http://www.dnv.org RSS Feed: http://www.dnv.org/rss.asp On May 4, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Bruce Reeves wrote: I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files? -- Bruce Nortex Networks___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support?
That is what I thought too, but what about this: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-commits/2006-February/001461. html ??? No. iSAC is a codec from GIPS. Likely the coded used by Skype. Michael On Thu, 4 May 2006 21:35:07 +1000, James Harper wrote: --- I assume you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISAC but maybe you are referring to one of the controller chips on BRI adapters? James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trond G. Andersen Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 20:19 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ISAC support? Hi All. Has there been done any work to support ISAC ? Thanks, trond ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] o713-861-4005 o800-905-6412 c713-201-1262 fwd 54245 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Volume configuration on Polycom Soundpoint 501 phone
sip.cfg volume voice.volume.persist.handset=1 voice.volume.persist.headset=1 voice.volume.persist.handsfree=1/ Jim Freeze wrote: We are using the polycom 501 phones, and are having some challenges with the volume setting. When a phone call comes in, the user ups the volume for the handset, but they have to repeat that for every call. Currently, the volume level seems to reset itself at about 60%. Is there a way for the user to change their default volume level? Thanks -- Jim Freeze ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Unable to get TDM400p working
This has got to be a stupid error I'm making... I have been experimenting with different hardware and software configurations before I decide what to use as a production platform. Up until just recently things were going well. But now it appears I'm unable to get access to my TDM400p from Asterisk. I know the TDM card works fine, used it in another machine where it performed flawlessly. I have been using the same set of conf files, just copying them over from machine to machine. The hardware is Pentium 4 all-Intel chipset mainboard. The one difference here is I'm trying CentOS. I've been through the problems getting Zaptel to compile with the error in spinlock.h. I got to... Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 4 channels configured. and thought I was home free. Wrong! zttool recognizes the card properly and reports status OK Asterisk runs and I can make calls on SIP phones with no problems. However I get no dial tone on the analog phone and outgoing calls through the TDM (from the SIP phones of course!) produce this on the console: NOTICE[5934]: app_dial.c:1010 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 66 - Channel not implemented) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) -- Executing Congestion(SIP/100-24d1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (internal, 91234567, 102) exited non-zero on 'SIP/100-24d1' The conf files are the same as they were on another working machine, I just copied them over. I'll be going over them /again/ next. What am I missing? Thanks. -Ben ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Help with IRQ conflict between wct2xxp and eth0
Title: Message I have a conflict problem with the eth0 card and wct2xxp digium board. The PRI can receive calls but my network connection is gone. When I "cat /proc/interrupts" I get the following: 1 .. 1 .. .. .. .. 169 0 IO-APIC-level wct2xxp, eth0 .. etc. even before I "modprobe wct2xxp" After I "modprobe wct2xxp" and "modprobe wctdm" and again run "cat /proc/interrupts" I then get: .. .. .. .. .. 169 118489 IO-APIC-level wct2xxp, eth0 201 118497 IO-APIC-level wctdm .. etc How can I force the wct2xxp to load on a separate IRQ? I tried moving the eth0 to IRQ 10 but could not. Any ideas? Thank you. Phil Menico XTEND Communications 171 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 212-951-7632 (Office) 212-951-7683 (Fax) www.xtend.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Volume configuration on Polycom Soundpoint 501 phone
Edit your config files to enable persistance Will remain across multiple calls, but not reboots On May 4, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Jim Freeze wrote: We are using the polycom 501 phones, and are having some challenges with the volume setting. When a phone call comes in, the user ups the volume for the handset, but they have to repeat that for every call. Currently, the volume level seems to reset itself at about 60%. Is there a way for the user to change their default volume level? Thanks -- Jim Freeze ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations
You can use my script, based on Chris Mason's script, to do most of what you want, you can feed it your MAC's and Extensions and it will create the phones. Be warned, it's not pretty, my perl book was in storage so I did a lot of kludging. Feel fee to update. http://holburn.com/poly/poly-add-phone.pl Chad From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce ReevesSent: May 4, 2006 2:45 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Tool for Polycom configurations I am getting read to roll out close to 100 polycom phones and wondered if any one knows of a program to take a list of MAC addresses, extensions, and names and generate the configuration files? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREACHABLE?
On Thursday 04 May 2006 15:51, Tom Engleward wrote: Am I supposed to make a cron job to automatically tell asterisk to reload every so often, since iax2 likes to periodically die? Or maybe am I supposed to make a cron job to place a phone call every so often from an external phone into my asterisk system and verify that asterisk actually answers, and immediately issue asterisk a reload if it fails? No, you are supposed to realize that a) this software cost you nothing. Not one penny. b) this software is user-supported. This means that in order to make it better you need to help. and c) we don't owe you anything. Not a thing. If you're not a programmer, you can help with bug reports, packet traces, helping us run test cases of fixes, etc. If you are a programmer, you can try to help us figure out what's causing it directly and creating scenarios in which it happens. In either case. you may NOT bitch and whine about how unacceptable it is. If you want to pay someone to listen to you complain, buy ABE, or go buy your father's PBX. This is utterly ridiculous. Yes, I know, it's free software and all, and you get what you pay for. Just in a bad mood today because I've literally lost thousands of dollars due to asterisk's failure to reliably answer incoming calls, and I only discover these failed incoming call attempts later when I check my PSTN originator's logs. I then go oh crap! and do a test call into my asterisk system, and get Ma Bell's the number you are calling has been disconnected or is no longer in use, and I issue a reload to asterisk and try again, and this time my call succeeds. At this rate soon it will be more profitable for me to just invest in a traditional reliable PBX hooked to Ma Bell and be done with these problems. I'm not a Digium customer, so they have no reason to listen to me, but surely there are Digium customers who are also getting bitten by this iax2 bug. Is anybody on this list actually using iax2 for anything mission-critical? I use Asterisk for my company's phone system. EVERY call, and I mean every one (faxes too) passes through two Asterisk boxes. One connected to our PRI downtown, and one connected to our Norstar here at the office. Since January I've passed over 37000 calls through these boxes. Yes, we've had bad days. We've had days where it's crashed and we've dropped every call in progress. We also run the svn trunk (i.e. bleeding edge) code, which is both a blessing and a curse. :-) Overall though, it has worked VERY well for us, and we're just starting to scratch the surface of the capabilities I have sold this solution on. My customers, however, know and understand that this is new and will have some hiccups. I try to minimize it, of course, but it's an inevitability. If it's mission critical, you should also have the facilities to handle failover and clustering. If it's mission critical, where was your Nagios or other network monitor watching, placing test calls and paging you whenever this happened? If this is mission critical, where is your contingency plan? Losing thousands of dollars is never fun, but if you're not willing to help with the bugfixes and throw some wrench time at the problem then you should not be trying to sell a solution using Asterisk. It really is that simple. That'd be equivalent to someone not knowing a socket wrench from a wing-nut and opening up his own full-service auto garage. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Unable to get TDM400p working
couple of things... was asterisk compiled after zaptel? from the cli try load chan_zap.so and see what you get Ben Gore wrote: This has got to be a stupid error I'm making... I have been experimenting with different hardware and software configurations before I decide what to use as a production platform. Up until just recently things were going well. But now it appears I'm unable to get access to my TDM400p from Asterisk. I know the TDM card works fine, used it in another machine where it performed flawlessly. I have been using the same set of conf files, just copying them over from machine to machine. The hardware is Pentium 4 all-Intel chipset mainboard. The one difference here is I'm trying CentOS. I've been through the problems getting Zaptel to compile with the error in spinlock.h. I got to... Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 4 channels configured. and thought I was home free. Wrong! zttool recognizes the card properly and reports status OK Asterisk runs and I can make calls on SIP phones with no problems. However I get no dial tone on the analog phone and outgoing calls through the TDM (from the SIP phones of course!) produce this on the console: NOTICE[5934]: app_dial.c:1010 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 66 - Channel not implemented) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) -- Executing Congestion(SIP/100-24d1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (internal, 91234567, 102) exited non-zero on 'SIP/100-24d1' The conf files are the same as they were on another working machine, I just copied them over. I'll be going over them /again/ next. What am I missing? Thanks. -Ben ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail records funny - Asterisk 1.2.7.1
I have asterisk 1.2.7.1 running on Fedora core 5. Everything looked like it compiled OK. When a call is bumped to voicemail, the message prompts sound fine to the user. However, when thevoice message is retrieved, it sounds "compressed" or speeded up. I have checked this against the voicemail ofmy productionversion of asterisk (1.2.5, running on FC4), and found that the wav file recorded on the new version is about 1/5 the size of thewav from the old. Help? Thanks, Mark McQuiggan This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Meetme from MySQL
try http://sourceforge.net/projects/web-meetmeChris Blunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi List, Is it possible to store meetme config in a MySQL table?If so, any pointers would be appreciated.ThanksChris --Chris Blunt Entropy IT Ltd ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREACHABLE?
Are you specifying the remote Asterisk box by IP or by hostname. If by hostname, then specify it by IP. Asterisk's DNS lookup support has issues. 2) What is your qualify= set to. Set it to yes (2000), or don't set it at all. Also look at the qualify smoothing options in iax.conf.sample. Tom Engleward wrote: rant From this thread today I've learned that the problems I've been having the entire time I've been using asterisk (about two weeks) stem not from NAT, as I originally thought, but from asterisk itself, so that if I were to move my asterisk box to a public IP address, my iax2 connection to my PSTN originator (which also runs asterisk) would _still_ be unreliable. This makes iax2 on asterisk useless for receiving calls. No matter how many spiffy features asterisk has, there is one simple nonnegotiable requirement: it must always answer incoming calls. If it can't do that, then it can't be relied on. And over iax2, it can't do that. Isn't asterisk supposed to by default reregister iax2 connections every minute or something like that? Why then do I get reliable incoming connections for several hours, and then it dies, and I have to do a reload? Am I supposed to make a cron job to automatically tell asterisk to reload every so often, since iax2 likes to periodically die? Or maybe am I supposed to make a cron job to place a phone call every so often from an external phone into my asterisk system and verify that asterisk actually answers, and immediately issue asterisk a reload if it fails? This is utterly ridiculous. Yes, I know, it's free software and all, and you get what you pay for. Just in a bad mood today because I've literally lost thousands of dollars due to asterisk's failure to reliably answer incoming calls, and I only discover these failed incoming call attempts later when I check my PSTN originator's logs. I then go oh crap! and do a test call into my asterisk system, and get Ma Bell's the number you are calling has been disconnected or is no longer in use, and I issue a reload to asterisk and try again, and this time my call succeeds. At this rate soon it will be more profitable for me to just invest in a traditional reliable PBX hooked to Ma Bell and be done with these problems. I'm not a Digium customer, so they have no reason to listen to me, but surely there are Digium customers who are also getting bitten by this iax2 bug. Is anybody on this list actually using iax2 for anything mission-critical? /rant -- Now accepting new clients in Birmingham, Atlanta, Huntsville, Chattanooga, and Montgomery. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users