[asterisk-users] Music on hold stops on blind transfer

2007-07-11 Thread Jakub Głazik
Asterisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops 
when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. 

Is this normal behaviour? How to change this?

Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial.


-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/zytek-08737000, SIP/113|180|Tt) 
in new stack -- Called 113
-- SIP/113-08758000 is ringing
-- SIP/113-08758000 answered SIP/zytek-08737000
-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on channel 'SIP/zytek-08737000' 
-- SIP/113-08758000 Playing 'pbx-transfer' (language 'en') 
-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/zytek-08737000 
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/zytek-08737000, 
SIP/zytek|180|Tt) in new stack 
-- Called zytek 
-- SIP/zytek-0875d000 is ringing

PS. I am not receiving ANY mails from the list since subscribe (?)

-- 
.: Jakub Głazik,
.: email  jabber: zytekatnuxi.pl

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk and Hardware Requirements

2007-07-11 Thread Josh
Hello,

I would like to put 1 asterisk box in Country A and 1 asterisk box in Country B.

Let's assume :
- Asterisk box in country A = GWA
- Asterisk box in country B = GWB
- Calling party number (located in country A) = CgPNA
- Called party number (located in country B) = CdPNB
- Second Called party number (located in country B) = sCdPNB
- PSTN in country A = PSTNA
- PSTN in country B = PSTNB

The idea is:
The end user in country B will have 2 phone numbers : CdPNB and sCdPNB
CgPNA is dialling CdPNB through PSTNA.
The call will be intercepted by GWA.
GWA will process the call, will change the CdPNB to sCdPNB and direct it via
IP to GWB. If the quality of the call via IP is not really good, then I want
to redirect it through E1 lines via KPN which will be able to route the call
to GWB. GWB will then transmit the call through the PSTNB and will reach
sCdPNB.

First Scenario
--
GWA's requirements would be:
- 1 E1 port receiving the calls through PSTNA
- 1 E1 port connected to KPN to re-route the calls
- Asterisk? being able to map ~5000 CdPNB to sCdPNB
- Handling up to ~50 simultaneous calls
- Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
- H323 and SIP compliant

GWB's requirements would be:
- 1 E1 port receiving the calls routed through KPN from GWA
- 5 E1 port connected to PSTNB
- Handling up to ~150 simultaneous calls
- Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
- H323 and SIP compliant
- Asterisk managing the whole thing

Second Scenario
---
GWA's requirements would be:
- 5 E1 port receiving the calls through PSTNA
- 10 E1 port connected to KPN to re-route the calls
- Asterisk? being able to map ~5 CdPNB to sCdPNB
- Handling up to 500 simultaneous calls
- Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
- H323 and SIP compliant

GWB's requirements would be:
- 10 E1 port receiving the calls routed through KPN from GWA
- 50 E1 port connected to PSTNB
- Handling up to ~1500 simultaneous calls
- Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
- H323 and SIP compliant
- Asterisk managing the whole thing

I was wondering whether Asterisk could handle each scenario and what kind of
hardware I would need to support each scenario.

I hope I've been clear enough in my explanations.
Looking forward for your comments/inputs.

Regards,
cam

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Bill Maidment
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:37:29 +0200, Christian Victor wrote
 I have the same problem. My mail sent yesterday around 20:00h and it still
 not arrived at the list. Sent from germany by the way.
 
 Christian

email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July

--
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
www.maidment.vu


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] registering Asterisk on SIP/Nortel MCS server

2007-07-11 Thread Kate Kretz

it used to be previous version of MCS, which was very easy to register with
Ekiga

recently ISP upgraded MCS to version 4 (I guess ?) and their proprietary
SIP/unistim piece of software sends weird SIP/XML and other queries.

I sniffered all of them, the most important I guess is SIP registration
with XML things,
can You help me how can I add those queries to asterisk ?


On 7/4/07, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Kate,

The Nortel MCS' SIP stack is a little special. You need to add special
headers to the REGISTER messages in order to register with it. That means
you'll need to touch Asterisk's source code. You can use wireshark to
capture a successful REGISTER and see what headers you need.

Regards,

Brian

Neotiq Consulting
www.neotiq.com


On 6/28/07, Kate Kretz  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hello there...

 our telecom sold us VoIP-numbering, managed by Nortel MCS
 I successfully registered Ekiga to it (
 http://sol.chel.skbkontur.ru/ekiga.png)

 What exactly do I have to write in sip.conf to make Asterisk register on
 this SIP ?

 Cheers,
 Kate


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] how to force asterisk to read registration information from DB

2007-07-11 Thread Ricardo Carvalho

In a redundancy scheme, I have two asterisk servers, each running on
different machines although sharing the same MySQL DB for relatime sip.

Problem arises when the second server assumes the production. When some
phone tries to establish a new call, those INVITEs reach the new server,
although this server seems to don't read the registration information kept
in sip_buddies table to know if the destination phone is registered or not,
and so, the call fails.

Because the destination phone was registered in the first server, I was
expecting that the second server when assuming production would first read
the sip_buddies DB table to see if the destination phone was registered or
not, but that seems to don't happen. It seems that registration information
is only kept in memory and isn't read from DB!

Is there any way that I can force Asterisk to read sip_buddies realtime DB
table to know if destination phone is registered?

Regards,
Ricardo Carvalho.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] video calls - Windows / Linux interoperability ?

2007-07-11 Thread Bent Bagger
Hi

2007/7/11, Bruce Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 For windows you can't really go wrong with X-lite 3.0, the free version of
 eye-beam.


You should bear in mind, though, that Ekiga uses the H.261 video codec
and X-lite uses H.263. Each of them only knows one video codec, so
they are not interoperable, at least not at the time of writing.
Asterisk does not do video translation.

Regards,

Bent

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Jared Smith
On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th July

When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
we have some chance of tracking down the problem.  For example, below
are the headers from your post as the message came to me.  If my math
is right, it shows about a sixteen minute delay from the time you send
the message to the list to the time I got it.  Without seeing the
headers though, it's going to be difficult (if not impossible) for the
Digium IT team to be able to see if the problem is on their end, or
somewhere else in between.

-Jared

Received: from lists.digium.com (lists.digium.com [216.207.245.17])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si30015978agb.2007.07.11.03.14.08;
Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 216.207.245.17 as
permitted sender)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal)
by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1I8Ywh-0006nM-CV; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:19 -0500
Received: from exprod8mx66.postini.com ([64.18.3.166] helo=psmtp.com)
by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1I8Ywd-0006nG-8i
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:57:15 -0500
Received: from source ([150.101.116.251]) by exprod8mx66.postini.com
([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:57:13 PDT
Received: from mail1.maidment.vu (mail1.maidment.vu [192.168.2.8])
by mail2.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6B9v8M8007038
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:08 +1000
Received: from mail1.maidment.vu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.maidment.vu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6B9v5km020073
for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:57:05 +1000

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Hardware Requirements

2007-07-11 Thread Jared Smith
On 7/11/07, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The idea is:
 The end user in country B will have 2 phone numbers : CdPNB and sCdPNB

Wow... sounds like a fun setup!  Your question is probably a little
in-depth for the mailing list (as it depends on a lot of variables),
but let's see what we can do to at least get you pointed in the right
direction.


 First Scenario
 --
 GWA's requirements would be:
 - 1 E1 port receiving the calls through PSTNA
 - 1 E1 port connected to KPN to re-route the calls
 - Asterisk? being able to map ~5000 CdPNB to sCdPNB
 - Handling up to ~50 simultaneous calls
 - Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
 - H323 and SIP compliant

OK, first of all you'd need 2 E1 ports in GWA -- something like the
Digium TE220P card if you've got a PCI Express slot, or the TE210P if
you've got a 3.3v PCI slot, or the TE205P if you've got a 5v PCI slot.
 You'd also need a TC400B card in the box to be able to G.723.1 (and
handle G.729A more efficiently).

 GWB's requirements would be:
 - 1 E1 port receiving the calls routed through KPN from GWA
 - 5 E1 port connected to PSTNB
 - Handling up to ~150 simultaneous calls
 - Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
 - H323 and SIP compliant
 - Asterisk managing the whole thing

This would be very similar to the configuration for GWA, except that
you'd need 6 E1 ports (which you could get with a combination of a
2-port and 4-port E1 card).  You'd also want to make this a much
beefier box, as handling 150 simultaneous calls might bring a weak
server to its knees.

 Second Scenario
 ---
 GWA's requirements would be:
 - 5 E1 port receiving the calls through PSTNA
 - 10 E1 port connected to KPN to re-route the calls
 - Asterisk? being able to map ~5 CdPNB to sCdPNB
 - Handling up to 500 simultaneous calls
 - Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
 - H323 and SIP compliant

Doing 500 simultaneous calls on a single Asterisk server is probably
not the wisest thing to do.  I'd suggest you spread the load across
several Asterisk boxes (maybe across 4 boxes, each with a 4-port E1
card such as the Digium TE420P).


 GWB's requirements would be:
 - 10 E1 port receiving the calls routed through KPN from GWA
 - 50 E1 port connected to PSTNB
 - Handling up to ~1500 simultaneous calls
 - Using G711, G.723.1  G.729.a codec
 - H323 and SIP compliant
 - Asterisk managing the whole thing

Again, connecting 60 E1s and handling 1500 simultaneous calls on a
single Asterisk box is a recipe for disaster.  You'll need to spread
the load across many servers to be able to handle that kind of
traffic.

-Jared

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] iax2 peer become UNREACHABLE

2007-07-11 Thread Jonathan Unai Marquez
Hi, I have 2 Asterisk connected over a VPN with iax2 and has been 
working perfectly for the last two weeks, but now, one of the boxes has 
decided stop seeing the other, so now I can only place calls on one 
direction:

bart*CLI iax2 show peers
Name/UsernameHost Mask Port  Status
moe/bart 192.168.1.201   (S)  255.255.255.255  4569 (T)  
UNREACHABLE
1 iax2 peers [0 online, 1 offline, 0 unmonitored]


moe*CLI iax2 show peers
Name/UsernameHost Mask Port  Status
bart/moe 192.168.2.201   (S)  255.255.255.255  4569 (T)  OK 
(43 ms)
1 iax2 peers [1 online, 0 offline, 0 unmonitored]

This is my iax.conf file:
[general]
bindport=4569
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
language=es
bandwidth=low
disallow=all
allow=gsm
allow=lpc10

[moe]
type=friend
host=192.168.1.201
context=extensions
username=bart
secret=secret
auth=plaintext
peercontext=extensions
qualify=yes
trunk=yes

The other:

[general]
bindport=4569
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
language=es
bandwidth=low
disallow=all
allow=gsm
allow=lpc10

[bart]
type=friend
host=192.168.2.201
context=extensions
peercontext=extensions
auth=plaintext
username=moe
secret=secret
qualify=yes
trunk=yes

I have restarted both Asterisk with no luck, any clues to where should I 
search for the soluton?

thanks,
Jonathan.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] softphone with g729 codec

2007-07-11 Thread Maximo Villamayor


you can prove this www.portsip.com

Gordon Henderson wrote:


On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, jonny hashem wrote:

 


Hi:
Iam looking for a sip softphone that supports g729 codec
Any one have an idea ?
   



eyeBeam - the commercial version of X-Lite:

http://www.counterpath.com/index.php?menu=Productssmenu=eyeBeam

Gordon

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] iax2 peer become UNREACHABLE

2007-07-11 Thread MCelo

Why don´t you try to change this line:

qualify=yes

to this one:

qualify=3000 or 4000

I think that the problem could be in the time that Asterisk uses to look at
the another peer.

Try it and tell us.


MCelo.




2007/7/11, Jonathan Unai Marquez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi, I have 2 Asterisk connected over a VPN with iax2 and has been
working perfectly for the last two weeks, but now, one of the boxes has
decided stop seeing the other, so now I can only place calls on one
direction:

bart*CLI iax2 show peers
Name/UsernameHost Mask
Port  Status
moe/bart 192.168.1.201   (S)  255.255.255.255  4569 (T)
UNREACHABLE
1 iax2 peers [0 online, 1 offline, 0 unmonitored]


moe*CLI iax2 show peers
Name/UsernameHost Mask
Port  Status
bart/moe 192.168.2.201   (S)  255.255.255.255  4569 (T)  OK
(43 ms)
1 iax2 peers [1 online, 0 offline, 0 unmonitored]

This is my iax.conf file:
[general]
bindport=4569
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
language=es
bandwidth=low
disallow=all
allow=gsm
allow=lpc10

[moe]
type=friend
host=192.168.1.201
context=extensions
username=bart
secret=secret
auth=plaintext
peercontext=extensions
qualify=yes
trunk=yes

The other:

[general]
bindport=4569
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
language=es
bandwidth=low
disallow=all
allow=gsm
allow=lpc10

[bart]
type=friend
host=192.168.2.201
context=extensions
peercontext=extensions
auth=plaintext
username=moe
secret=secret
qualify=yes
trunk=yes

I have restarted both Asterisk with no luck, any clues to where should I
search for the soluton?

thanks,
Jonathan.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Walt Reed
No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 

List USERS can not help you. 

Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
mechanisms, etc.

Many people fail to realize that high-volume mail servers (especially
for large mailing lists) don't have long timeouts and therefore can't
tolerate slow recipient servers. It takes too many resources. Make sure
that you whitelist list mail at all phases of your protection systems.
Make sure you are NOT doing sender callouts, running every message
through spamassassin, greylistging, etc. for list mail.

Lastly, there is nothing Digium is going to be able to do if your DNS
servers are flakey, or route path is.

Headers just tell you that there is a delay. We already know this. Only
the sending AND receiving server logs can tell you WHY, and then you may
only know if the session was run in debugging mode.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:33:43AM -0400, Jared Smith said:
 On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th 
  July
 
 When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
 we have some chance of tracking down the problem.  For example, below

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread David Boyd
Walter,

I know you just said that list users can not help with this problem,
however I must beg to differ with you. The information that you just
provided is a big help, if people take your advice about the
configuration of their internal systems. So in one way it is off the
topic of Asterisk, but is on target for helping people solve their
issues if they interact more efficiently with the list and the resources
that it provides.

IMHO,

Dave

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 08:47 -0400, Walt Reed wrote:
 No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
 here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
 keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 
 
 List USERS can not help you. 
 
 Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
 delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
 who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
 wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
 anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
 SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
 mechanisms, etc.
 
 Many people fail to realize that high-volume mail servers (especially
 for large mailing lists) don't have long timeouts and therefore can't
 tolerate slow recipient servers. It takes too many resources. Make sure
 that you whitelist list mail at all phases of your protection systems.
 Make sure you are NOT doing sender callouts, running every message
 through spamassassin, greylistging, etc. for list mail.
 
 Lastly, there is nothing Digium is going to be able to do if your DNS
 servers are flakey, or route path is.
 
 Headers just tell you that there is a delay. We already know this. Only
 the sending AND receiving server logs can tell you WHY, and then you may
 only know if the session was run in debugging mode.
 
 On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:33:43AM -0400, Jared Smith said:
  On 7/11/07, Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   email delays here are about 8 days. I don't expect to see this until 19th 
   July
  
  When you do get the message, please reply with the email headers, so
  we have some chance of tracking down the problem.  For example, below
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] VoIP + IM unified client

2007-07-11 Thread Alejandro Cabrera Obed
Dear all, I have a Debian/Asterisk server and I connect several
softphones using SIP in a first test and IAX in a second test. They work
OK in both cases; I use Twinkle client for SIP conversations and Kiax
for IAX.

But now I want to have IM also, I mean a voip client with a chat
messenger incorporated, always using Asterisk. My questions are:

1) Do I have to add some module/package to my Asterisk in order to have
IM ???

2) What SIP+IM client do you recommend to me ???

3) And what IAX+IM client do you recommend to me ???

Thanks in advance,


Alejandro




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] softphone with g729 codec

2007-07-11 Thread Guillermo Salas M.
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 08:32 -0400, Maximo Villamayor wrote:
 
 you can prove this www.portsip.com
 

You can use the older version of firefly that supports IAX2/SIP
protocols and g729 codec.

Get the sofhophone and codec from:

http://razametal.is-a-geek.org/asterisk/Softphones/Windows/firefly/firefly-thirdparty.exe

http://razametal.is-a-geek.org/asterisk/Softphones/Windows/firefly/g729.zip


To enable the g729:
1.- Install firefly-thirdparty.exe;
2.- close firefly program;
3.- extract g729.dll from g729.sip to c:/program files/firefly;
4.- start firefly, setup a new account and enable the g729 check box;


Regards,



 Gordon Henderson wrote: 
  On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, jonny hashem wrote:
  

   Hi:
Iam looking for a sip softphone that supports g729 codec
   Any one have an idea ?
   
  
  eyeBeam - the commercial version of X-Lite:
  
  http://www.counterpath.com/index.php?menu=Productssmenu=eyeBeam
  
  Gordon
  
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
  
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  

 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Guillermo Salas M.
Telconet S.A.
Calle 15 y Avenida 24 Esq
Edificio Barre #2 Primer Piso
Telefono : +593 5 262 8071
Celular  : +593 9 985 5138
e-mail   : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www  : http://www.manta.telconet.net
   http://www.telcocarrier.net

Linux User: 255902

Beat me, whip me, make me use Windows!

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Please avoid the Top Posting, see
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] MOH stop and resume when i hold

2007-07-11 Thread Johny Mail list
Hi list,
I have a strange comportment of the MOH system on my asterisk.
When i respond to a call and after fews second i set this call in hold
mode the correspondent listen the music fine.
When i re-take my correspondent at T0 instant the music is paused. And
when i re-hold him at T60 (60 second later) the sound is always at T0
when he was stopped at T0. So the music is stopped and don't continue
(normal comportment) when i speak with peoples.

Someone know the problem? a solution?

Thanks

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and IPv6

2007-07-11 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 16:06, Mon 02 Jul 07, Bent Bagger wrote:
 Hi Russell
 
 Again, thanks for info.
 
 2007/7/2, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  I can assure you that once we have some plans in place, I will announce 
  them.
 
 
 I'll wait for it, but I won't hold my breath ;-)
 
 
  $ svn co http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/blanchet/v6 asterisk-ipv6
 
 I downloaded, built and installed it without problems. However, when I
 run it, it aborts after about 8 seconds with a pthread error. Where
 would be the best place to ask for help - this list? the
 asterisk-devel list? or some specific person?

Best you can do is report a bug on http://bugs.digium.com
Read the guidelines before doing so ;)
-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Monitor events?

2007-07-11 Thread Anthony Francis
Stefan Reuter wrote:
 Hey Daniel,

 I think adding the events would be a good idea.
 Just open an issue on http://bugs.digium.com/ and attach your patch
 there. Be sure to send a disclaimer to digium so your patch can be
 included in the distribution (see
 http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines for details).

   
 actually you probably know i am using your java-asterisk :)
 

 and of course if you already have patches for Asterisk-Java that support
 your new events post it to http://jira.reucon.org referencing the digium
 issue.

 =Stefan

   
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
WTF

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Monitor events?

2007-07-11 Thread Anthony Francis
Anthony Francis wrote:
 Stefan Reuter wrote:
   
 Hey Daniel,

 I think adding the events would be a good idea.
 Just open an issue on http://bugs.digium.com/ and attach your patch
 there. Be sure to send a disclaimer to digium so your patch can be
 included in the distribution (see
 http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines for details).

   
 
 actually you probably know i am using your java-asterisk :)
 
   
 and of course if you already have patches for Asterisk-Java that support
 your new events post it to http://jira.reucon.org referencing the digium
 issue.

 =Stefan

   
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 WTF

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
Hi,

I guess I should clarify. My name is Anthony, I was the one that said I 
had written a patch, if Daniel also said he had done so and I missed 
that email I apologize.

Anthony


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Monitor events?

2007-07-11 Thread Alex Balashov

Dear Sir,

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Anthony Francis wrote:

 WTF

   I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your 
quarterly newsletter.

-- Alex


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Call Waiting

2007-07-11 Thread Joe acquisto
Since the beginning (of my Asterisk life) I have an install that is, 
supposedly, set up for call waiting.

Using a TDM400p, with FXO and FXS modules.

On the Analog phones, I can hear the Incoming call (call waiting) tone, but the 
system does not respond to a hook flash, to place the current call on hold 
and answer the incoming call.   I have not attempted, nor research how/if this 
can be done on SIP.

What am I not grasping here? About the Analog phone/Asterisk actions.

Not too vague, I hope.

joe a.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Music on hold stops on blind transfer

2007-07-11 Thread Stephen Bosch
Hi, Jakub:

Jakub Głazik wrote:
 Asterisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops 
 when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. 
 
 Is this normal behaviour? How to change this?

Sadly, this is normal behaviour.

 Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial.

Well, no -- here, the log shows that MOH is stopping before Dial.

 -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/zytek-08737000, 
 SIP/113|180|Tt) in new stack -- Called 113
 -- SIP/113-08758000 is ringing
 -- SIP/113-08758000 answered SIP/zytek-08737000
 -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on channel 'SIP/zytek-08737000' 
 -- SIP/113-08758000 Playing 'pbx-transfer' (language 'en') 
 -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/zytek-08737000 
 -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/zytek-08737000, 
 SIP/zytek|180|Tt) in new stack 
 -- Called zytek 
 -- SIP/zytek-0875d000 is ringing
 
 PS. I am not receiving ANY mails from the list since subscribe (?)

Yes, users outside North America seem to be getting messages very late.
I'm told that Digium is aware of the problem. You might want to contact
the list owner. Contact information can be found at:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Monitor events?

2007-07-11 Thread Stefan Reuter
Anthony Francis wrote:
 I guess I should clarify. My name is Anthony, I was the one that said I 
 had written a patch, if Daniel also said he had done so and I missed 
 that email I apologize.

Well then disclaim it and post it to the asterisk bug tracker or post
its issue id if you already did.

=Stefan

-- 
reuter network consulting
Neusser Str. 110
50760 Koeln
Germany
Telefon: +49 221 1305699-0
Telefax: +49 221 1305699-90
E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Steuernummern 215/5140/1791 USt-IdNr. DE220701760



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] List delays

2007-07-11 Thread Stephen Bosch
Walt Reed wrote:
 No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them
 here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins.  It is 100% off topic to
 keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. 
 
 List USERS can not help you. 
 
 Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such
 delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of
 who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something
 wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS,  routing problems,
 anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam,
 SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam
 mechanisms, etc.

I don't buy this. This problem did not appear until Digium changed list
servers.

If there's a DNS problem, it's probably with the list server configuration.

-Stephen-

PS: Did they name the Army Medical Center after you?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users