Re: [asterisk-users] Where to download Junghanns ISDNguard software?

2007-10-04 Thread Jean-Denis Girard
Nick Richardson a écrit :
 Hi list,
 
 I recently purchased an ISDNguard from Junghanns. It came with no
 software and there is no sign on their website or in any of their
 documentation where to download it. I have looked in
 http://www.junghanns.net/downloads/ and there is no sign of it there
 either. The only thing remotly close ther is
 isdnguard-asterisk-1.2.13.patch. Their documentation refers to
 /usr/sbin/ISDNguard. Where does one get this mysterious binary from?
 
 I have emailed their support a few times and get no response, needless
 to say I am NOT a happy customer.
 
 Can anyone help me with a download link?

It is in their bristuff package: you'll have to pick res_watchdog and 
include it in your asterisk build.


Regards,
-- 
Jean-Denis Girard

SysNux  Systèmes Linux en Polynésie française
http://www.sysnux.pf/   Tél: +689 483 527 / GSM: +689 797 527

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Where to download Junghanns ISDNguard software?

2007-10-04 Thread Sylvain Boily
Hi Nick,

For using ISDNGuard, you can using res_watchdog from the bristuff patch.
I attach for you a version who have patched and work for asterisk
1.2.24. It's an archive with a makefile with just res_watchdog.
We have some clients who using this version from many month ago.

Sylvain

Le jeudi 04 octobre 2007 à 08:51 +1000, Nick Richardson a écrit :
 Hi list,
 
 I recently purchased an ISDNguard from Junghanns. It came with no
 software and there is no sign on their website or in any of their
 documentation where to download it. I have looked in
 http://www.junghanns.net/downloads/ and there is no sign of it there
 either. The only thing remotly close ther is
 isdnguard-asterisk-1.2.13.patch. Their documentation refers to
 /usr/sbin/ISDNguard. Where does one get this mysterious binary from?
 
 I have emailed their support a few times and get no response, needless
 to say I am NOT a happy customer.
 
 Can anyone help me with a download link?
 
 Thanks in advance..
 
 - Nick
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Sylvain BOILY
Proformatique - 67 rue Voltaire - 92800 Puteaux
Tel. : 01 41 38 99 64 - Fax. : 01 41 38 99 70
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://proformatique.com/

Vers un monde plus libre

Proformatique est membre de l'ASS2L
http://www.ass2L.org


pf-asterisk-res-watchdog_0.1.1~svn1570.orig.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm fxo module always busy

2007-10-04 Thread gincantalupo
Hi Chawki,
it is not uncommon that FXO or FXS modules do not work even if no error 
message is shown when wctdm module is loaded.
Have you tried to replace/swap your FXO modules?

Giorgio

chawki hammoud wrote:
 Hi:


 I have a digium tdm04B. One fxo module always gives a
 faulty busy signal when a call comes in. I swaped
 places and  re-compiled zaptel with no change. Is this
 a faulty fxo or configuration issue.


 Regards;
 Chawki Hammoud



 
 Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! 
 FareChase.
 http://farechase.yahoo.com/

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Friday VOIP Users Conference 12:30 PM EDT

2007-10-04 Thread randulo
This Friday at 12:30 PM EDT

We hope to hear more about Astricon and the 1.6 version. A UK legal
professional, John Halton of Cripps Harries Hall LLP, joins us to
discuss how the law is coming to terms with VOIP. We also expect a
visit from Arick of IPKall about what's cooking with them. Most of
all, we expect you, the community to share in this experience!

For more info see:

 http://www.VoipUsersConference.org

for conference-specific discussion:

 http://groups.google.com/group/VOIP-Users-Conference

During the conferences we monitor IRC:
freenode.net #voip-users-conference

Thanks to Digium for their continued support.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Multi tenant

2007-10-04 Thread Mujtaba Mahmood
Hi all,

i just wanted to know if any one has done any multi-tenant version of the
asterisk.

thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] tdm fxo module always busy

2007-10-04 Thread randulo
On 10/4/07, chawki hammoud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a digium tdm04B. One fxo module always gives a
 faulty busy signal when a call comes in. I swaped
 places and  re-compiled zaptel with no change. Is this
 a faulty fxo or configuration issue.

Hi,

I suggest you post your related zaptel files here and why not call or
email Digium support?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Infuriating problems: no dial tone, dropped calls, no voice: 1.2.13 and 1.4.11

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Totaro
Christian Weeks wrote:
 Hi
 I've had an asterisk setup for the past 15 months, based on the debian
 asterisk packaging. Until late August of this year, I had no problems
 once initial setup was complete- the system worked essentially
 flawlessly.

 Since August I have been having exceedingly infuriating intermittent
 problems that are causing me occasional periods of nasty trouble:
 1. No Dial Tone. Every Sunday night at just prior to midnight ( about
 the last second before monday), the Dial tone ceases on all zap
 handsets. Investigation shows that the zaptel layer is not transmitting
 sound to the handset- ztmonitor shows it being sent, but nothing is
 arriving at the handset. (You can also see sound being rx from the
 handset). This problem has occured spontaneously at other times but the
 midnight thing is just plain odd (nothing is happening on that box at
 the time).
 2. I tried to upgrade from the asterisk packages in debian etch (1.2.13)
 to sid (1.4.11). This added new problems to the mix. Suddenly, no voice
 was being offered through asterisk at all to any zap channel. I tracked
 it down to my use of T/t in the Dial strings- this was somehow
 preventing native bridging from occuring. This can be verified because
 other call routings (e.g. IAX-zap; SIP-zap) have the same problem (and
 cannot be corrected by removing a t/T because there's no native bridge).
 Reverting to 1.2.13 seems to have fixed this problem. (Is this some kind
 of sound path regression? Debug logging has shown nothing).
 3. Finally, with 1.4.11 especially, the system seems to have been quite
 unstable, with asterisk crashing (and ringing every phone in the house
 incessantly- which my wife was NOT happy about), especially when two
 simultaneous calls overlap in some way (this hasn't crashed 1.2.13 as
 badly, but asterisk seemed to need a reset afterwards).

 I suspected a dodgy channel bank ( I had a really old eBay special for
 $20 which had timing problems from day 1 ) so I upgraded a little ( the
 Zhone - more expensive and not super, but at least it has firmware and a
 console for mgmt ). This has had some effect, but nothing has changed
 about the fundamental problem (1 above).

 Other hardware: the T1 interface card is the R1T1 from rhino, there is a
 Wildcard TDM400P REV I, with a single FXO port for the incoming line
 from the POTS. The computer itself seems quite fine, no sign of
 interrupt errors or other problems with the hardware (I ran a memtest
 and a cpuburn neither of which showed any issues). zttest shows nothing
 unusual (99.87% iirc over about 10 minutes).

 I am happy to share anything that will help resolve the issue- my feeble
 C skills in attempting some printf in the ast_channel_bridge command to
 see what was being chucked about pretty much failed entirely because the
 timing went badly off... Trying to chuck ast_log calls in there didn't
 work very well either :(

 Thanks
 Christian
   
I think you should stick with 1.2 for now at least until all the bugs 
are worked out.  Stability seems to be a real issue although many would 
have you believe otherwise.

The other thing that jumps out is the exact timing of your issue in 
number 1.  Random problems  can be very difficult to track down but 
yours is consistent, so it should be pretty easy to find the culprit.  
Check your cron jobs.  If you have something running at almost midnight 
on Sunday, that is probably your issue.  Logs may be of help.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL

2007-10-04 Thread Barzilai Spinak
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of 
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
Except most people rooting for extension.conf don't even have the 
technical and conceptual amplitude to understand what they are talking 
about... they just want some telephony system to make a quick buck, or 
save in their LD calls...
A lot of Asterisk is technically and architecturally twisted, and 
spaghettied, and with many redundant ways of doing the same thing (in 
different stages of obsolescence, incompleteness, and (un)documented). 
At least AEL is a step in the right direction (even though it has to 
adapt itself to the ugliness that exists below..)

BarZ

Steve Murphy wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:33 -0600, Anthony Francis wrote:
   
 Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
 
 Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore 
 rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
 
 
 AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.

   
   
 Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?

 

 Absolutely not! 

 Reasons to use AEL:

 1. Several semantic checks are done on the AEL that are NOT done if you
 go straight to extensions.conf. We try to protect you... from yourself.

 2. At least one security issue in USAGE is avoided by having AEL compile
 the corresponding code; as to how many more issues will automatically be
 handled via
 AEL in the future, is impossible to say. We'll see. If you keep coding
 via
 extensions.conf, be prepared to make corrections... if you do it in AEL,
 a restart of Asterisk will hopefully suffice, after AEL is updated.

 3. Syntax errors are reported by AEL. It is pretty good at catching all
 omissions
 and commissions. Better than the extensions.conf parser is. For example,
 I don't
 know if we catch it now, but if you accidentally say extem = 3,...
 instead of 
 exten = 3,... in extensions.conf, that line will silently be dropped.
 Sure, we
 could fix this, but to fix ALL possible problems will require an
 expensive rewrite of the config file parser, from the ground up.

 4. You are insulated against any mods to extensions.conf; like the
 change to ',' instead of '|' in app arguments. No changes to AEL code
 are necessary.

 5. In extensions.conf, you have to feed your dialplan to asterisk to
 find any problems. AEL provides the standalone parser, aelparse, so you
 can correct any problems BEFORE feeding it to a living asterisk.

 6. AEL is easier to read, IF you take advantage of the ability to use
 tabs, etc. wisely. Especially for nested code. Staying away from goto as
 much as possible,
 and using the flow of control and looping statements will make your code
 easier to read, compose, and maintain in the future. It means fewer bugs
 in your code,
 and overall this all means lower cost. And higher profits.

 7. Repetitious entry of extenname, priority,  in your tabular
 extensions.conf can lead to subtle errors that could be hard to find,
 ESPECIALLY if you resort to using priority NUMBERS instead of n. And,
 if you ARE so foolish as to use just raw numbers, and you have to insert
 or delete a line or two, you have to renumber
 the remaining lines, and heaven help you if you make a simple error, and
 accidentally skip a number.

 8. Work flow. Since aelparse allows you to dump the compiled dialplan in
 extensions.conf format, you can still use stuff like realtime. You can
 use this output against machines that don't even have pbx_ael loaded,
 then, and you should be able to use 1.4 compiled dialplans on 1.2
 machines, as long as you are careful about what apps you call, and how
 you call them.

 9. Easier to write code. Good Code. using Goto's in extensions.conf will
 allow you to do anything you need to do, but it also results in
 spaghetti style code.
 While the original author might be able to decrypt it, and  maintain it,
 unless it's really well commented, the next guy to play with it, is
 going to have a hard time. Following the flow of control thru spaghetti
 can get your adrenalin flowing-- and side affects from strange cases and
 leakage in the spaghetti can make some devilishly hard to solve
 problems.

 Think of and treat extensions.conf like assembly code.

 Think of and treat AEL like a high(er) level language. For those who
 never did the computer science thing, I have just one piece of advise,
 and ignore this at your peril: your dialplan is a work of computer
 programming. It's software. If you don't treat it that way, and use good
 software methodologies, you'll pay your price.

 murf



   
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and 

Re: [asterisk-users] No audio on Zap (T1/PRI) channels

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Totaro
Steve Edwards wrote:
 On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Steve Totaro wrote:

   
 Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 
 Steve Edwards wrote:


   
 [trunkgroups]
  trunkgroup  = 1,24,96
  spanmap = 1,1,0
  spanmap = 2,1,2
  spanmap = 3,1,3
  spanmap = 4,1,1

 
 You caused the behavior you are seeing by configuring your spanmap this
 way; you've got physical span #4 configured as the second span in the
 trunkgroup, so Zaptel will treat physical channels 73-95 as logical
 channels 1/1 through 1/23.

   
 If it were configured as the second span, shouldn't is be channels 25-48
 rather than 1-23?  voip-info was very unclear about this when I looked
 at it over a year ago.  I finally got it working by trying different
 combinations in spanmap.

 Digium should have it's own wiki that is maintained by Digium.
 Voip-info is ok but much of it is old and or incorrect at this point.
 

 Qwest and I fiddled for a couple of hours. The channels are answered in 
 ascending sequence and match between logical span/channel and 
 zap/channel. Channels 0/24 (zap/24) and 1/24 (zap/48) are skipped 
 because they are the primary and secondary D channels.

 Still no joy -- no audio.

 Here's zaptel.conf:

 # span 1
 span= 1,1,0,esf,b8zs
 bchan   = 1-23
 dchan   = 24

 # span 2
 span= 2,0,0,esf,b8zs
 bchan   = 25-47
 dchan   = 48

 # span 3
 span= 3,0,0,esf,b8zs
 bchan   = 49-72

 # span 4
 span= 4,2,0,esf,b8zs
 bchan   = 73-96

 # (end of /etc/zaptel.conf)

 and zapata.conf:

 [trunkgroups]
  trunkgroup  = 1,24,48
  spanmap = 1,1,0
  spanmap = 2,1,1
  spanmap = 3,1,2
  spanmap = 4,1,3

 [channels]
  context = block-ani
  echocancel  = no
  echocancelwhenbridged   = no
  echotraining= no
  group   = 1
  resetinterval   = never
  signalling  = pri_cpe
  switchtype  = dms100

 ; span 1 (1-24)
  channel = 1-23
 ; span 2 (25-48)
  channel = 25-47
 ; span 3 (49-72)
  channel = 49-72
 ; span 4 (73-96)
  channel = 73-96

 ; (end of /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf)

 Any more clues on where to look to find my missing audio?

 Thanks in advance,
 
 Steve Edwards  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
 Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000


   
The wiki page is still as cryptic as ever.  
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/NFAS

As I said before, I just kept changing the values in spanmap until it 
worked.  This was with Global Crossing.  There are only a handfull of 
combinations to try.  I did not use a backup D chan as I figured if one 
D chan went down on a trunk group, both probably would so that adds to 
your mix.

Just keep fiddling with spanmap and testing calls.  If you can get your 
provider to point DID a did to each individual span, it will make 
troubleshooting much easier without needing a tech on the phone.  This 
is how I solved my issue.

 From the wiki:
spanmap = 1,1,3
spanmap = 2,1,1
spanmap = 3,2,2
spanmap = 4,2,0

When we had it configured 0,1,2,3 any calls that came into spans 1 or 2 
worked fine. But spans 0 and 3 did not pass any audio. Switching the 
logical span numbers fixed it. This is because zapspan #1 is suppose to 
be the one that the D-Channel is on. In our case that was actually 
logical span 3. Be sure to watch out for this, we were confused and took 
up a few hours of a GBLX tech's time to get it fixed.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Secondary Dialtone and selecting a specific line from Zap/g

2007-10-04 Thread bilal ghayyad
Dear Mojo;

That is primary fine, but there are two issues looking
for help about them:

1) Based on your below example (dialing *4*18005551212
to select channel 4), the question is how to give
second dial tone just after dialing the *4*
(indicating the channel was captured)?

2) How to let this second dial tone to be with a
frequency differs than normal tone when pickup the
handset to place a call?

3) How to let (assign) one of the button on my IP
Phone to be dedicating for a zap channel, so when I
select this button and do dialing for a number, then
call will be done via that specific zap channel. 

Any help?
Regards
Bilal 
-

It would be ugly, but you could prefix a zap channel
or group number 
before the phone number to dial.  Using groups for an
example:

exten = _*X*X.,1,Dial(ZAP/g${EXTEN:1:1}/${EXTEN:3})
exten = _*XX*X.,1,Dial(ZAP/g${EXTEN:1:2}/${EXTEN:4})

so dialing *4*18005551212 dials out over zap group
4...


bilal ghayyad wrote:
 I need to select a line from the Zap group channel
 using the SIP Phone (not FXO and not FXS ports).

 ignorepat does not work?

 Also, what is the method to let the second dial tone
 has another tone frequency?

 Regards
 Bilal



   

Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the 
tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Secondary Dialtone and selecting a specific line from Zap/g

2007-10-04 Thread bilal ghayyad
Dear Walt;

Maybe I did not understand any thing from below :) -

Are you talking about configuration to be done on the
Telephone device is self or on the AVAYA server it
self? If it is on the telephone device, so how you
will give a second dial tone and you do not know if
there is available channel :) -  

I am looking to have a second dial tone by doing such
configuration at AVAYA server itself, and that to be
used by all users of different IP Phones models (not
link sys only).

Can you help?
Regards
Bilal




--
For another tone frequency for the outside dialtone,
try putting this
value [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL 
PROTECTED];*(.4/0/1),10(*/0/2+3) in
the Outside 
Dialtone field. It will give you a slight pause
followed by a different
dialtone frequency. On a Linksys/Siprua 941, that
would be at the top
of the Regional page.

However, you won't hear any secondary dialtone unless
you put a comma
after EVERY initial '9' in the dialplan string for
each line in use.
On a 941, that would be at the bottom of the Ext 1 and
Ext 2 pages of 
the web interface. I suggest the dialplan string of:
(*xx|[1-7]xx|9,[3469]11|98|99|9,[2-9]xx|9,11|9,[2-9]xx|9,1[2-9]xx[2-9]xx|9,011xxx.)

- Walt Joyce


Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
 I can't help you with that.  I only wanted to point
out that
 ignoreopat 
 is not what you need.
 
 On Polycom SIP phones you continue dialtone by
placing a , in the 
 phone's dialplan.  SIP phones have their own
internal dialplan that
 is 
 not part of Asterisk's dialplan.  You would have to
check the docs
 for 
 your phone.  Not all SIP phones can continue
dialtone.
 
 bilal ghayyad wrote:
 
I need to select a line from the Zap group channel
using the SIP Phone (not FXO and not FXS ports).

ignorepat does not work?

Also, what is the method to let the second dial tone
has another tone frequency?

Regards
Bilal



   

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play 
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Configuration files inside SQLite3

2007-10-04 Thread Karsten Wemheuer
Hi Mark,

Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 11:15 -0500 schrieb Mark Michelson:
 GNUbie wrote:
  Hello all,
 
  Is it possible to store, read and write configuration files in an 
  SQLite3 database instead of using the configuration files inside the 
  /etc/asterisk/ directory?  If it is then can you point me to the right 
  documentation on how to do this or probably hints on how to do this?
 
  Thank you in advance.
 
  GNUbie
 
 
 It is possible to store configuration files in any relational database 
 which has ODBC compatibility. Thus, sqlite qualifies. If you are using 
 trunk, you won't even need to use ODBC, because Asterisk has native 
 support for sqlite.

Are You shure the native support of asterisk is for SQLite3 as the
original poster asks for? AFAIK * supports SQlite (Version 2, not 3),
which has a completely different API.

Karsten Wemheuer


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] About Megaco

2007-10-04 Thread Floyd
Hi all,
I've been searching for a while and haven't found if
asterisk supports already or if it's going to support
h.248. 

thanks
Eve


  

¡Sé un mejor ambientalista!
Encuentra consejos para cuidar el lugar donde vivimos.   
http://telemundo.yahoo.com/promos/mejorambientalista.html

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] About Megaco

2007-10-04 Thread Brian West


On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Steve Totaro wrote:


Try searching using MGCP which is what Megaco evolved into.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+MGCP+channels

Thanks,
Steve Totaro


Too bad the MGCP channel isn't the full implementation.

/b

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL

2007-10-04 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
 All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
 assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.

As one of the main architects, I don't find this discussion pointless.  My
personal opinion of AEL is that it's coming along nicely, but it's still not
up to the point where I would consider using it for most dialplans.  That day
will come, and I'm working with Steve Murphy to ensure that it does.  One
thing that you did not see in the language wars of yesteryear was of the
assembly language changing in subtle ways, to make development in the
higher level language easier or more consistent, as is the case with AEL and
extensions.conf.

 Except most people rooting for extension.conf don't even have the
 technical and conceptual amplitude to understand what they are talking
 about... they just want some telephony system to make a quick buck, or
 save in their LD calls...

This seems like a rather harsh indictment, when it really comes down to the
fact that writing in extensions.conf works today, and while AEL does work to
a certain extent, many people would rather not have to rewrite their dialplans
every time an architectural flaw is found in AEL that limits what they can do;
ergo, they write their stuff in extensions.conf until the point where AEL
becomes more trusted.

 A lot of Asterisk is technically and architecturally twisted, and
 spaghettied, and with many redundant ways of doing the same thing (in
 different stages of obsolescence, incompleteness, and (un)documented).

As a maintainer and architect, I would very much like to hear specific
criticisms on how you think this could be improved.  We try to deprecate
specific functionality that doesn't work correctly or which could be expressed
in better ways, which allows users of the system to transition away from those
expressions to better methods over a period of time, instead of immediately at
an upgrade; we believe this facilitates adoptions and upgrade processes.

 At least AEL is a step in the right direction (even though it has to
 adapt itself to the ugliness that exists below..)

All high level languages have to adapt themselves to the ugliness below.  That
is part of what makes them high-level languages.

-- 
Tilghman

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Line State

2007-10-04 Thread Gustavo Gonzalez
 

Hello all, I need a little help to check the  state of the line from
asterisk on aa TDM400P because when the telco lines goes down, asterisk get
that line for outgoing calls. There is a way to check it out? 

And when all lines are busy to do outgoing calls how can i do to callback
the people that call when a line is free? 

 

Thanks  

 

Alejandro González
Grupo Gestión
4384-0660
www.grupo-gestion.com.ar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---

---
RI 9000-1069
Sistema de Gestión de Calidad
Certificado por IRAM
Norma ISO: 9001-2000

 

 

 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.24/592 - Release Date: 18/12/2006
01:45 p.m.

 

attachment: image001.gif___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] About Megaco

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Totaro
Floyd wrote:
 Hi all,
 I've been searching for a while and haven't found if
 asterisk supports already or if it's going to support
 h.248. 

 thanks
 Eve

   

Try searching using MGCP which is what Megaco evolved into.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+MGCP+channels

Thanks,
Steve Totaro


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Multi tenant

2007-10-04 Thread Alex Epshteyn
Hi Mujtaba,

 

We have a multi-tenant version of our Asterisk based management and end-user
software called Thirdlane PBX Manager. You can see a demo of a single-tenant
version on our web site http://www.thirdlane.com/pbxmanager.htm the
multi-tenant adds tenant and DID management, and allows to partition
Asterisk to manage independent tenants with their own administrators,
extensions, routes, queues, etc

 

Please contact me off list for more information.

 

Best regards,

Alex

 

Alex Epshteyn

Third Lane Technologies, LLC

http://www.thirdlane.com

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mujtaba
Mahmood
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 2:14 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Multi tenant

 

Hi all,

i just wanted to know if any one has done any multi-tenant version of the
asterisk.

thanks

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Fwd: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities

2007-10-04 Thread Caciano Machado
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:46:30AM -0300, Caciano Machado wrote:
 I'm receiving a lot of warning messages from my Asterisk
 1.2.5/chan_oh323 every time it establishes a channel with other
 Asterisk 1.4.2/chan_h323.


Questions about such matters should go to the asterisk-users mailing
list .

--
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk Caller ID Info

2007-10-04 Thread Arpit Mehta
Hi Asterisk Users,

I was wondering why a call that is received from Asterisk shows a caller ID
'Unknown' . So here is the scenario,

'A' calls 'Asterisk'. 'A' joins a conference on 'Asterisk'.
'Asterisk' calls 'B'. 'B' gets joined to the same conference also.

'B' somehow receives the caller ID 'Unknown' and not the number of
'Asterisk', is this a feature not supported in Asterisk or is there a
problem in my network ?

Any hints or suggestions would be really helpful ?

Regards

-- 
Arpit Mehta
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University

Tel: 1-646-387-5998
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Dial-Chain interrupted by Operator Called Party not reachable Messages

2007-10-04 Thread Christoph Adomeit
Hi,

I have the following problem: I want asterisk to dial
a chain of n-numbers until somebody picks up the line.
I am using Digium E1 Hardware (zaptel) for dialing out.

Dialing a Chain is basically no problem, I use somwthing like:
dial(no1,50)
dial(no2,50)
dial(no3,50)

However, If no1 is not reachable, for example it is a mobile
and switched off, then some automatic Operator-Voice from the
Mobile-Telco says forever: 
This number is currently not reachable and this means asterisk
thinks the call was succesfull and does not continue with the 
the other numbers.

Does somebody has an idea how I can distinguish those Operator
Voices from real calls ?




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Using PHP to reload extensions

2007-10-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:10:58PM -0500, Moises Silva wrote:
 If you are running the script from a web server, the script gets
 executed with the web server process permissions, hence, probably does
 not have access to /var/run/asterisk.ctl.
 
 You can give permissions to your web server, or better yet, dont
 execute the command using shell_exec, better open a socket connection
 to the Asterisk manager and execute Action: Command
 Command: extensions reload

Not that, in essense, this permits the web server's user to control
Asterisk as well - the web server's user must be able to read the
password from somewhere.

The only real benefit is if you can limit the permissions you give to
that specific manager user. But there's a limit to ohw useful this can
be. Even write=command alone allows changing the dialplan ('dialplan
add' / 'dialplan remove') and running an arbitrary command as the
asterisk user (originate a call to the application System).

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] need suggestion

2007-10-04 Thread Umair Bari
Dear All,

my client wants a asterisk pbx with 30 FXO  30 FXS analogue ports, please
suggest if sangoma A400 is a good option for that. Also please suggest
server hardware.

regards,

Umair
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Supermicro PDSME+ and TE110P [ ref:00D36mPe.50033qy57:ref ] NEW CASE 22828

2007-10-04 Thread Olivier
I never thought very useful to search in this
http://www.digium.com/en/docs/misc/compatibility_notes.php page, as it
looked rather static for holding such compatibility issues.
You proved me I was wrong.

Taking this e1000 driver issue as an example, this
http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000 project seems to provide a solution.
Reading http://www.digium.com/en/docs/misc/compatibility_notes.php I would
still have a doubt about the way to go.

Regards
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Question FXO Port

2007-10-04 Thread Markus Zielonka
Hello list

I am new in this list.
Before I wrote this email, i search with google and in the list
arichves for the question.
I look for a possibility to install FXO ports not over RJ11 Ports. I
will install the Ports by LSA+ Patch panel. Someone an idea ore link?

Thanks for help.

Bye MZ

PS: Perhaps you look on my blog  http://two-weeks-fun.blogspot.com

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Setting caller id value on outgoing calls using .call files

2007-10-04 Thread Arpit Mehta
Hi all,

I was looking at a way to add the caller id to the outgoing calls (which are
made using .call files) using asterisk. Any ideas how to do this ?
Currently I get 'Unknown' number displayed on my phone when asterisk makes
an outgoing call.

Also using something like this is not working as it still displays unknown
number. I want set the callerid on the 1.call which is made.

exten = _.,4,Set(CALLERID(all)=Joe 911)
exten = _.,5,system(cp /var/spool/asterisk/1.call
/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/)

Any suggestions how to do that.

Thanks a lot.

Regards

-- 
Arpit Mehta
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University

Tel: 1-646-387-5998
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Setting caller id value on outgoing calls using .call files

2007-10-04 Thread Arpit Mehta
Thanks guys. No need to reply. I got my answer from someone.

On 10/4/07, Arpit Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,

 I was looking at a way to add the caller id to the outgoing calls (which
 are made using .call files) using asterisk. Any ideas how to do this ?
 Currently I get 'Unknown' number displayed on my phone when asterisk makes
 an outgoing call.

 Also using something like this is not working as it still displays unknown
 number. I want set the callerid on the 1.call which is made.

 exten = _.,4,Set(CALLERID(all)=Joe 911)
 exten = _.,5,system(cp /var/spool/asterisk/1.call
 /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/)

 Any suggestions how to do that.

 Thanks a lot.

 Regards

 --
 Arpit Mehta
 Graduate Student
 Department of Computer Science
 Columbia University

 Tel: 1-646-387-5998




-- 
Arpit Mehta
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University

Tel: 1-646-387-5998
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Caller ID Info

2007-10-04 Thread Arpit Mehta
Thanks a lot guys.  I got my answer from someone. :)


On 10/4/07, Arpit Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Also what are the ways if any to set this DNIS or RDNIS information  ?

 Regards

 Arpit

 On 10/4/07, Arpit Mehta  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi Asterisk Users,
 
  I was wondering why a call that is received from Asterisk shows a caller
  ID 'Unknown' . So here is the scenario,
 
  'A' calls 'Asterisk'. 'A' joins a conference on 'Asterisk'.
  'Asterisk' calls 'B'. 'B' gets joined to the same conference also.
 
  'B' somehow receives the caller ID 'Unknown' and not the number of
  'Asterisk', is this a feature not supported in Asterisk or is there a
  problem in my network ?
 
  Any hints or suggestions would be really helpful ?
 
  Regards
 
  --
  Arpit Mehta
  Graduate Student
  Department of Computer Science
  Columbia University
 
  Tel: 1-646-387-5998




 --
 Arpit Mehta
 Graduate Student
 Department of Computer Science
 Columbia University

 Tel: 1-646-387-5998




-- 
Arpit Mehta
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University

Tel: 1-646-387-5998
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Caller ID Info

2007-10-04 Thread Arpit Mehta
Also what are the ways if any to set this DNIS or RDNIS information  ?

Regards

Arpit

On 10/4/07, Arpit Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Asterisk Users,

 I was wondering why a call that is received from Asterisk shows a caller
 ID 'Unknown' . So here is the scenario,

 'A' calls 'Asterisk'. 'A' joins a conference on 'Asterisk'.
 'Asterisk' calls 'B'. 'B' gets joined to the same conference also.

 'B' somehow receives the caller ID 'Unknown' and not the number of
 'Asterisk', is this a feature not supported in Asterisk or is there a
 problem in my network ?

 Any hints or suggestions would be really helpful ?

 Regards

 --
 Arpit Mehta
 Graduate Student
 Department of Computer Science
 Columbia University

 Tel: 1-646-387-5998




-- 
Arpit Mehta
Graduate Student
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University

Tel: 1-646-387-5998
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Voicemail/dtmf not working?

2007-10-04 Thread Alan Lord
Hi,

I am setting up an asterisk server for testing purposes and cannot get 
voicemail to work at all.

My host OS is Linux From Scratch 6.3 and the asterisk software versions 
I built are zaptel-1.4.5.1 and asterisk-1.4.12.

I am using the Ekiga softphone on my Ubuntu desktop machine. My asterisk 
server and client phone are on different computers but are on the same 
LAN, i.e. no NAT.

I have an echo test extension which works fine. But when I try to call 
into my voicemail account using 8100, I do not hear the first Playing 
'vm_password' message (although do I hear the subsequent messages). And 
any numbers I enter on the ekiga keypad do not seem to be recognised by 
asterisk (I enabled debug rdp and rfc2833 packets appear to be 
transmitted and received). The softphone is set up to use RFC2833 for DTMF.

I have a single x100p card installed which seems to work - to a 
fashion... Incoming calls are answered and the greeting is heard, but 
the line hangs up instantly the message finishes. (A different problem 
which I will investigate seperately unless someone has a quick answer). 
Outgoing calls seem to be O.K. An lsmod of my system reveals the following:
===
Module  Size  Used by
zttranscode 6280  0
wcfxo   9760  0
zaptel186660  6 zttranscode,wcfxo
crc_ccitt   1792  1 zaptel
===

Below is a typical call log (I *am* typing 1234 on the ekiga keypad 
during this call) and my extension, sip and voicemail.conf files. Anyone 
got any suggestions?

Messages on log
=
 -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Answer(SIP/100-081d9478, ) in 
new stack
 -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] VoiceMailMain(SIP/100-081d9478, 
100) in new stack
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-password' (language 'en')
 -- Incorrect password '' for user '100' (context = default)
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-incorrect' (language 'en')
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-password' (language 'en')
 -- Incorrect password '' for user '100' (context = default)
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-incorrect' (language 'en')
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-password' (language 'en')
 -- Incorrect password '' for user '100' (context = default)
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-incorrect' (language 'en')
 -- SIP/100-081d9478 Playing 'vm-goodbye' (language 'en')
   == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/100-081d9478' status is 'UNKNOWN'
=


extension.conf

;exten = $name,$priority,$application()
[globals]
ALANL=SIP/100
OUTBOUNDTRUNK=Zap/1
FWDNUMBER=867*** ; My FreeWorldDialup Number
FWDCIDNAME=Alan Lord ; My CLI
FWDPASSWORD=**
FWDRINGS=${ALANL} ; Phone to ring
FWDVMBOX=1000 ; Voice Mail Box (not yet setup)

[zap_incoming] ; Channel defined in zapata.conf
exten = s,1,Answer( )
exten = s,2,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=5)
exten = s,3,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=30)
exten = s,4,Background(vm-enter-num-to-call)
exten = s.5,Wait(5) ;Try to stop line hanging up straight away - failed

exten = t,1,Goto(s,2) ; Repeat s,2 if no input from caller

exten = i,1,Playback(pbx-invalid)
exten = i,2,Goto(s,2)

exten = 100,1,Dial(${ALANL},10)
exten = 100,2,VoiceMail(u100)
exten = 100,102,VoiceMail(b100)
exten = 100,3,Hangup()

[internal]
include = outbound-local

; My ekiga SoftPhone
exten = 100,1,Dial(${ALANL},,r)

;Outbound to FreeWorlDialup
exten = _393.,1,SetCallerId,${FWDCIDNAME}
exten = 
_393.,2,Dial(IAX2/${FWDNUMBER}:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN:3},60,r)
exten = _393.,3,Congestion

; Local echo test
exten = 611,1,Answer()
exten = 611,2,PlayBack(demo-echotest)
exten = 611,3,Echo()
exten = 611,4,PlayBack(demo-echodone)
exten = 611,5,Hangup()

; Manage Voicemail
exten = _8XXX,1,Answer()
exten = _8XXX,2,VoiceMailMain(${EXTEN:1})

; Outbound via PSTN
[outbound-local]
exten = _9XX,1,Dial(${OUTBOUNDTRUNK}/${EXTEN:1})
exten = _9XX,2,Congestion()
exten = _9XX,102,Congestion()

exten = 999,1,Dial(${OUTBOUNDTRUNK}/999)
exten = ,1,Dial(${OUTBOUNDTRUNK}/999)

[fromiax] ; IAX trunk from Alan B defined in iax.conf
;TBD

[fromiaxfwd] ;IAX Trunk from FWD
exten = ${FWDNUMBER},1,Dial(${FWDRINGS},20,r)
exten = ${FWDNUMBER},2,Voicemail,u${FWDVMBOX}
exten = ${FWDNUMBER},102,Voicemail,b${FWDVMBOX}
=

sip.conf
=
[general]
srvlookup=yes
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
allow=gsm
dtmfmode=auto

[100]
type=friend
callerid=Alan Lord
secret=**
qualify=yes ; Qualify peer is no more than 2000 ms away
nat=no ; This phone is not natted
host=dynamic ; This device registers with us
canreinvite=no ; Asterisk by default tries to redirect
context=internal ; the internal context controls what we can do
mailbox=100 ; Voicemail Box
===


Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7940G licensing with asterisk

2007-10-04 Thread Olivier
There are other Gigabit SIP phones from Nortel and Avaya, if my memory
serves me right.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3 released

2007-10-04 Thread shadowym
Just forget it about the 1.2 mantra, it's not going to happen.  Focus your
energy elsewhere.

Lot's of bug fixes are good.  Even Cisco comes out with regular bug fixes
for IOS.  Open source just makes things more visible.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Totaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.12 and Asterisk-addons 1.4.3
released

Don Pobanz wrote:
 the Asterisk release contains a large number of 
 bug fixes for all parts of Asterisk.
 

 I am thankful to see the amount of fixes that have gone into this
 release. However, seeing this many fixes does not give me a warm fuzzy
 feeling that we won't see a lot more fixes in the near future. So are
 bug fixes good or bad? ;-) And more importantly, will any of the
 remaining bugs bite me? 

 Branch 1.4 has one important to us feature that 1.2 does not and that is
 the queue autofill option. Because of this one feature, I have been
 wanting to switch to the 1.4 branch for some time. We have a backup
 system that I will be using for testing. If all goes well, we will move
 to the 1.4 branch. I hope many others are doing the same so the
 stability of 1.4 can be improved to the point where no one is concerned.


 Thanks to all the developers for improving an already great product! 

 Don Pobanz
   
Another reason to call for a 1.2 spoon or fork!

Thanks,
Steve Totaro




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] G.722: ast_channel_make_compatible failure

2007-10-04 Thread Ondrej Valousek
Well I know.
My problem is, that the phone offering g722 could do alaw as well.
I expected asterisk should just chose alaw for the communication - no
transcoding is necessary then...

Please help.
Thanks,

Ondrej

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 Ondrej Valousek wrote:

   
 [Sep 20 10:14:32] WARNING[30706]: chan_sip.c:2963 sip_call: No audio
 format found to offer. Cancelling call to phone3
 

 Asterisk 1.4 does not have G.722 transcoding, only passthrough support.
 It can connect G.722 channels together, and record or playback G.722
 audio files, but that is all.

   


The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential 
and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you 
are not an intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or 
retain this e-mail or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all copies of this 
e-mail from your computer system(s).
Please direct any additional queries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You.
Silicon and Software Systems Limited. Registered in Ireland no. 378073.
Registered Office: Whelan House, South County Business Park, Leopardstown, 
Dublin 18

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Setting caller id value on outgoing calls using .call files

2007-10-04 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Arpit Mehta wrote:

 I was looking at a way to add the caller id to the outgoing calls (which are
 made using .call files) using asterisk. Any ideas how to do this ?

Add
Callerid: Name 123
to the call file.

Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de
  My pick of the month: rfc 2822 3.6.5

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail/dtmf not working?

2007-10-04 Thread Doug Lytle
Alan Lord wrote:
 sip.conf
 =

 [100]
 type=friend
 callerid=Alan Lord
 secret=**
 qualify=yes ; Qualify peer is no more than 2000 ms away
 nat=no ; This phone is not natted
 host=dynamic ; This device registers with us
 canreinvite=no ; Asterisk by default tries to redirect
 context=internal ; the internal context controls what we can do
 mailbox=100 ; Voicemail Box
   
Try adding:

dtmfmode = rfc2833

Doug

-- 
 
Ben Franklin quote:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Setting caller id value on outgoing calls using .call files

2007-10-04 Thread James FitzGibbon
On 10/4/07, Arpit Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I was looking at a way to add the caller id to the outgoing calls (which are
 made using .call files) using asterisk. Any ideas how to do this ?
 Currently I get 'Unknown' number displayed on my phone when asterisk makes
 an outgoing call.


Add a CallerID: whatever line to your callfile.

http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+auto-dial+out has a
reference of the callfile contents.

-- 
j.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Setting caller id value on outgoing calls using .call files

2007-10-04 Thread Jared Smith
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:10 -0400, Arpit Mehta wrote:
 exten = _.,4,Set(CALLERID(all)=Joe 911)
 exten =
 _.,5,system(cp /var/spool/asterisk/1.call /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/)
  

You need to set the Caller ID in the call file itself.  The sample call
file (sample.call) in the Asterisk source contains the following line:


Callerid: Wakeup Call Service (555) 555-

Hopefully that gets you going in the right direction.


-- 
Jared Smith
Community Relations Manager
Digium, Inc.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Caller ID Info

2007-10-04 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Arpit Mehta wrote:

 Thanks a lot guys.  I got my answer from someone. :)

Not that I'm interested in this specific issue, but usually
it won't hurt to share your solution with the other list
members (and archives).

Doesn't apply to this case maybe.


Cheers,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] #modprobe wctdm or #modprobe zaptel

2007-10-04 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi list;

I need to run the command modprobe wctdm and whenever
I write it, then it gives me the following message:

FATAL: Module wctdm not found
FATAL: Error running install command for wctdm 

So, do I have to run that command from specific path?
Or what is the problem?

Any help?

Regards
Bilal


   

Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! 
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Using PHP to reload extensions

2007-10-04 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
No, because then asterisk would be presented three arguments: '-rx', 
'extensions', and 'reload' -- as 'extensions' is not a command by 
itself, and the 'reload' appears superfluous to asterisk, this would not 
work as desired.

Asterisk needs to be presented two arguments - the first is '-rx', the 
second is extensions reload (needs additional quoting to contain the 
space) which is actually a parameter to the '-x' switch just used.
$output = shell_exec(asterisk -rx 'extensions reload')
is right.

Generally, the difference between single quotes and double quotes is 
that with double quotes, PHP is allowed to make $variable substitution 
while with single quotes, it is not.

Mojo


Lee Jenkins wrote:
 I'm not a PHP guy, but shouldn't the double quote be surrounding the 
 entire shell command like this?

 $output = shell_exec('asterisk -rx extensions reload');
   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail/dtmf not working?

2007-10-04 Thread Doug
At 11:10 10/4/2007, Alan Lord wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am setting up an asterisk server for testing purposes and cannot get
 voicemail to work at all.
 
 My host OS is Linux From Scratch 6.3 and the asterisk software versions
 I built are zaptel-1.4.5.1 and asterisk-1.4.12.
 
 I am using the Ekiga softphone on my Ubuntu desktop machine. My asterisk
 server and client phone are on different computers but are on the same
 LAN, i.e. no NAT.
 
 I have an echo test extension which works fine. But when I try to call
 into my voicemail account using 8100, I do not hear the first Playing
 'vm_password' message (although do I hear the subsequent messages). And
 any numbers I enter on the ekiga keypad do not seem to be recognised by
 asterisk (I enabled debug rdp and rfc2833 packets appear to be
 transmitted and received). The softphone is set up to use RFC2833 for DTMF.
 
 I have a single x100p card installed which seems to work - to a
 fashion... Incoming calls are answered and the greeting is heard, but
 the line hangs up instantly the message finishes. (A different problem
 which I will investigate seperately unless someone has a quick answer).

SIP Info? 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] G.722: ast_channel_make_compatible failure

2007-10-04 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Ondrej Valousek wrote:

 My problem is, that the phone offering g722 could do alaw as well.
 I expected asterisk should just chose alaw for the communication - no
 transcoding is necessary then...

That is not how Asterisk works, and is well known in the community as
something that users would like to see changed, but has not yet been
done. Asterisk negotiates the codecs (formats) for each call leg pretty
much independently of the others, so if a G.722 endpoint initiates the
first call leg, and the destination call leg cannot accept G.722, and
there is no transcoder available, then the call will fail. If the
non-G.722 endpoint initiates the first call leg then the call will
likely go through, which is somewhat unfortunate :-)

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Director of Software Technologies
Digium, Inc. - The Genuine Asterisk Experience (TM)

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Strange Call problems on some numbers

2007-10-04 Thread Mail Lists
I am having some really strange problems calling from 2 asterisk boxes
of mine. One is  version 1.2.22 the other 1.2.18. The problem is
identical on both boxes.

When I try to call certain numbers (8006375410, for instance) the call
rings and rings and rings. Eventually the receiving end will pick up
in the middle of an IVR as if I had been connected for some time
already.

When I call this number from a cell phone it connects normally.

When I call this number from a sip phone connected to an asterisk box
running 1.4 and out through a pri it connects normally.

When I call it from these other two asterisk boxes out through
whatever provider(my pri box, voip providers, whatever) it exhibits
this behaviour..


Does anyone know what might be causing this? It's turning int a
significant problem.


Thanks

Steve Glaus
Peachnet Communications.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Call problems on some numbers

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Totaro
Mail Lists wrote:
 I am having some really strange problems calling from 2 asterisk boxes
 of mine. One is  version 1.2.22 the other 1.2.18. The problem is
 identical on both boxes.

 When I try to call certain numbers (8006375410, for instance) the call
 rings and rings and rings. Eventually the receiving end will pick up
 in the middle of an IVR as if I had been connected for some time
 already.

 When I call this number from a cell phone it connects normally.

 When I call this number from a sip phone connected to an asterisk box
 running 1.4 and out through a pri it connects normally.

 When I call it from these other two asterisk boxes out through
 whatever provider(my pri box, voip providers, whatever) it exhibits
 this behaviour..


 Does anyone know what might be causing this? It's turning int a
 significant problem.


 Thanks

 Steve Glaus
 Peachnet Communications.
   

Do you have an r in your outbound dial statement.  If so, you will hear 
ringing until you get an answer event rather than the actual audio on 
the line.  Some companies pass a little audio before technically answering.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] #modprobe wctdm or #modprobe zaptel

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Totaro
bilal ghayyad wrote:
 Hi list;

 I need to run the command modprobe wctdm and whenever
 I write it, then it gives me the following message:

 FATAL: Module wctdm not found
 FATAL: Error running install command for wctdm 

 So, do I have to run that command from specific path?
 Or what is the problem?

 Any help?

 Regards
 Bilal
   

Did you compile and install zaptel?

Thanks,
Steve


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Dial-Chain interrupted by Operator Called Party not reachable Messages

2007-10-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Christoph Adomeit wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have the following problem: I want asterisk to dial
 a chain of n-numbers until somebody picks up the line.
 I am using Digium E1 Hardware (zaptel) for dialing out.
 
 Dialing a Chain is basically no problem, I use somwthing like:
 dial(no1,50)
 dial(no2,50)
 dial(no3,50)
 
 However, If no1 is not reachable, for example it is a mobile
 and switched off, then some automatic Operator-Voice from the
 Mobile-Telco says forever: 
 This number is currently not reachable and this means asterisk
 thinks the call was succesfull and does not continue with the 
 the other numbers.
 
 Does somebody has an idea how I can distinguish those Operator
 Voices from real calls ?

This is one of the VERY few times the r option to Dial will be helpful.

Dial(no1,50,r)  etc.

As long as the call is not answered (and the telco does not answer when 
they play that message) the r option will hide the audio the telco is 
sending.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Secondary Dialtone and selecting a specific line from Zap/g

2007-10-04 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
The problem here, if it's a problem, is that it IS a POTS dialtone and 
not asterisk's.  So you can dial only what the telco lets you dial. 


Al lists wrote:
 Here is how i overcome this problem,
 ignorpat = 9
 exten = 9*,1,Dial(ZAP/1/w)

 press 9* from your handset and after 1 second you have POTS line dial 
 tone on your phone,

 On 10/3/07, *Mojo with Horan  Company, LLC* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would be ugly, but you could prefix a zap channel or group number
 before the phone number to dial.  Using groups for an example:

 exten = _*X*X.,1,Dial(ZAP/g${EXTEN:1:1}/${EXTEN:3})
 exten = _*XX*X.,1,Dial(ZAP/g${EXTEN:1:2}/${EXTEN:4})

 so dialing *4*18005551212 dials out over zap group 4...


 bilal ghayyad wrote:
  I need to select a line from the Zap group channel
  using the SIP Phone (not FXO and not FXS ports).
 
  ignorepat does not work?
 
  Also, what is the method to let the second dial tone
  has another tone frequency?
 
  Regards
  Bilal
 
  
  No, ignorepat is for FXS ports (FXS ports use FXO
  signaling).  Also,
  ignorepat does not apply to SIP phones, because SIP
  phones provide
   their
  own dialtone, not a dialtone provided by Asterisk.
 
  Al lists wrote:
 
  Correction, on FXO port not FXS,
  second, read his email first:
  Also, how it will be possible to assign an
 
  dedicated
 
  line (connected to FXO) to an
  button on the Polycom IP Phone or Broadtel IP Phone,
  so if user select that button
  then he will be sure that his outside call will be
 
  via
 
  that specific line.
  Just assign a key on your phone to dial that
 
  extension, and you will
   have
 
  dial tone on selected line,
  then as a traditional PBX you can send any digits to
 
  your provider.
 
  On 10/1/07, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wrote:
 
  ignorepat continues dialtone after a leading digit
 
  has been dialed
   on
 
  FXS ports.  How does ignorepat help this guy?
 
  Al lists wrote:
 
  ignorpat is your friend
 
  On 9/30/07, Tzafrir Cohen
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 02:34:01AM -0700, bilal
 
  ghayyad wrote:
 
  Dear List;
 
  How can I place a call via Zap/g1 (group) but
 
  need to
 
  determine the line (FXO port)
  that will go via it?
 
  Simply don't use groups. Use channels directly.
 
  To dial via the
 
  specific
 
  Zaptel channel NN, use Zap/NN
 
  Am I missing anything?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now
 (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
  http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
 http://www.api-digital.com-- http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Call problems on some numbers

2007-10-04 Thread www.IPKall.com
Also, so TFN's do not answer the line. Airline TFN are famous for doing
this.

Arick Davis


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 2:53 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Strange Call problems on some numbers

Mail Lists wrote:
 I am having some really strange problems calling from 2 asterisk boxes
 of mine. One is  version 1.2.22 the other 1.2.18. The problem is
 identical on both boxes.

 When I try to call certain numbers (8006375410, for instance) the call
 rings and rings and rings. Eventually the receiving end will pick up
 in the middle of an IVR as if I had been connected for some time
 already.

 When I call this number from a cell phone it connects normally.

 When I call this number from a sip phone connected to an asterisk box
 running 1.4 and out through a pri it connects normally.

 When I call it from these other two asterisk boxes out through
 whatever provider(my pri box, voip providers, whatever) it exhibits
 this behaviour..


 Does anyone know what might be causing this? It's turning int a
 significant problem.


 Thanks

 Steve Glaus
 Peachnet Communications.
   

Do you have an r in your outbound dial statement.  If so, you will hear 
ringing until you get an answer event rather than the actual audio on 
the line.  Some companies pass a little audio before technically answering.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Setting caller id value on outgoing calls using .call files

2007-10-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:10:09PM -0400, Arpit Mehta wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I was looking at a way to add the caller id to the outgoing calls (which are
 made using .call files) using asterisk. Any ideas how to do this ?
 Currently I get 'Unknown' number displayed on my phone when asterisk makes
 an outgoing call.
 
 Also using something like this is not working as it still displays unknown
 number. I want set the callerid on the 1.call which is made.
 
 exten = _.,4,Set(CALLERID(all)=Joe 911)
 exten = _.,5,system(cp /var/spool/asterisk/1.call 
 /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/)
 

Two things:

1. You use a copying. Which means:
 - Create /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/1.call
 - Start writing content from original to new
 - close that 1.call

If Asterisk catches the call file in the middle of copying, you have a
problem.

2. _. may behave unexpectedly, I guess.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Using PHP to reload extensions

2007-10-04 Thread Michael Iedema
Hello,

  I am trying to use PHP to reload the extensions in an Asterisk
  installation. I keep getting this error:

 Easiest way without compromising security or changing permissions.  Use
 the AMI.

 1. Download phpagi (Just google it)
 2. Use it to connect to the Manager interface
 3. Use it to issue:
 Action: Command
 Command: reload

Here's the two functions I've been using. Add a new user to
manager.conf with the appropriate permissions and this should work
fine.

Hope that helps,
-Michael


function extensions_reload() {
return asterisk_exec(dialplan reload);
}

function asterisk_exec($cmd, $output=NULL) {

$token = md5(uniqid(rand()));
$errno = 0;
$errstr = 0;
$fp = fsockopen(localhost, 5038, $errno, $errstr, 20);
if (!$fp) {
  return 1;
}

fputs($fp, Action: login\r\n);
fputs($fp, Username: newusername\r\n);
fputs($fp, Secret: newpassword\r\n);
fputs($fp, Events: off\r\n\r\n);
usleep(500);

fputs($fp, Action: COMMAND\r\n);
fputs($fp, command: $cmd\r\n);
fputs($fp, ActionID: $token\r\n\r\n);
usleep(500);

$out = fread($fp, 38000);
while(strpos($out,--END COMMAND--)==0) {
$out .= fread($fp, 38000);  
}
fclose ($fp);

$out = substr($out, strpos($out, ActionID));
$out = substr($out, strpos($out, \n) + 1);
$out = substr($out, 0, strpos($out, --END COMMAND--) - 1);

$output = $out;

return 0;
}

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Where to download Junghanns ISDNguard software?

2007-10-04 Thread Nick Richardson
What if you don't use or want to use bristuff? We use Digium PRI cards
and don't need any of the BRIstuff


On 10/4/07, Sylvain Boily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Nick,

 For using ISDNGuard, you can using res_watchdog from the bristuff patch.
 I attach for you a version who have patched and work for asterisk
 1.2.24. It's an archive with a makefile with just res_watchdog.
 We have some clients who using this version from many month ago.

 Sylvain

 Le jeudi 04 octobre 2007 à 08:51 +1000, Nick Richardson a écrit :
  Hi list,
 
  I recently purchased an ISDNguard from Junghanns. It came with no
  software and there is no sign on their website or in any of their
  documentation where to download it. I have looked in
  http://www.junghanns.net/downloads/ and there is no sign of it there
  either. The only thing remotly close ther is
  isdnguard-asterisk-1.2.13.patch. Their documentation refers to
  /usr/sbin/ISDNguard. Where does one get this mysterious binary from?
 
  I have emailed their support a few times and get no response, needless
  to say I am NOT a happy customer.
 
  Can anyone help me with a download link?
 
  Thanks in advance..
 
  - Nick
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 --
 Sylvain BOILY
 Proformatique - 67 rue Voltaire - 92800 Puteaux
 Tel. : 01 41 38 99 64 - Fax. : 01 41 38 99 70
 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://proformatique.com/

 Vers un monde plus libre
 
 Proformatique est membre de l'ASS2L
 http://www.ass2L.org

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] No audio on Zap (T1/PRI) channels

2007-10-04 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
Steve Totaro wrote:
 Steve Edwards wrote:
 I have 12 T1's going into 3 servers, 4 in each into Digium, Inc. Wildcard 
 TE410P Quad-Span togglable E1/T1/J1 card 3.3v (rev 02) cards.

 Each group of T1's have the primary D on 24 and the secondary D on 96.

 The first server (ts20) and the last server (ts22) can playback 
 demo-congrats fine. The middle server (ts21) cannot -- just dead air.

 If I call via ZAP, dead air. If I call via IAX, I hear the file.

 I copied /etc/zaptel.conf, /etc/asterisk/*, 
 /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/demo-congrats.gsm from ts20 to ts21 -- no joy.

 I have seen this in my system log file:

 Oct 2 18:41:49 WARNING[7477]: chan_zap.c:8087 zt_pri_error: [Span 0 
 D-Channel 0] PRI: !! Got reject for frame 95, but we have nothing -- 
 resetting!

 I'm running asterisk-1.2.24, asterisk-addons-1.2.7, libpri-1.2.5, 
 zaptel-1.2.20.1.

 show channel zap/?, zap show channel ? appear identical between 
 working and non-working systems both on-hook and off-hook.

 Any clues or clues where to start looking?

 Thanks in advance,
 
 Steve Edwards  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
 Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000


   
 
 Double check both zaptel.conf and zapata.conf and also call the telco to 
 make sure they have they have the same NFAS scheme on all T1s setup 
 correctly.  Sometimes (let's face it, alot of times, the provider messes 
 something up).
 
 Also check that all of your T1 cables are plugged into the correct T1 
 port.  I have made that mistake myself when doing 28 T1s off a T3.  I 
 got dead air just as you described.

Yes, if you are running NFAS, getting dead air on a call is a symptom of 
not having the logical span identifier correctly corresponding to the 
physical span you have plugged in (spanmap option in zapata.conf, IIRC).

-- 
Matthew Fredrickson
Software/Firmware Engineer
Digium, Inc.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk status in Debian

2007-10-04 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Hello,
This is a update on the current status of Asterisk in Debian.
Apologies for the really long mail, it is targetted both to users and
maintainers :)

I'm Ccing asterisk-users as a one-time thing; users that are interested
can subscribe to our list[1] for updates to prevent noise on a
non-Debian list. Please Cc pkg-voip-maintainer on replies.

1: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-voip-maintainers

sarge/etch status
-
About a month ago, I fixed all the long-standing knownn vulnerabilities
in both sarge/oldstable (1.0.7) and etch/stable (1.2.12).
The updates are present security.debian.org a Advisory has been released
(DSA-1358[1]), thanks to Debian's Security Team.

These updates are fixing CVE-2007-1306, CVE-2007-1561, CVE-2007-2294,
CVE-2007-2297, CVE-2007-2488, CVE-2007-3762, CVE-2007-3763 and
CVE-2007-3764 (...).

1: http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1358

lenny status

1:1.4.11~dfsg-4 has been recently uploaded to unstable.
The previously mentioned block by the openh323 dependency which
currently fails to build in unstable (binutils bug: #440015) has been
workaround-ed (by having less strict shlibs in openh323)

From our POV, it's a good candidate for lenny/testing. However:
 - it depends on perl and net-snmp versions that are not present in
   testing and are not in a shape to be there; we'll need new versions
   from the respective teams.
 - asterisk needs to go together with yate because of a shared libpri
   dependency. However yate is being blocked[2] by gtk+2.0.
 - more importantly, asterisk produces an Internal Compiler Error of GCC
   4.2 on hppa (#445336). Until it builds successfully there, it cannot
   migrate to testing.

1: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=asterisk
2: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=yate

1.4.12
--
Digium released 1.4.12 the day before yesterday. I have committed all
the changes needed and we are now up to date.
Fortunately, many of our fixes that I reported upstream have been
merged. I have manually ported bristuff 0.4.0-test4 to 1.4.12; it needed
many changes compared to the previous upstream updates.
I will forward my changes to kapejod so that he can hopefully release a
new version.

supplementary packages
--
* asterisk-addons (-mp3, -mysql, -ooh323c) are finally present in Debian
  and should be ready to migrate to lenny after Asterisk does. Digium
  released a new version along with 1.4.12 and I will update this ASAP.
* asterisk-chan-capi, asterisk-spandsp-plugins, asterisk-oh323 had
  recents uploads and all are in a good shape.
* I am going to drop rate-engine from the archive (#444712) since it has
  no users, it wasn't released with etch, has open bugs for a really
  long time and is unmaintained by upstream.
* I tried compiling chan_misdn together with the mISDN maintainer (Simon
  Richter) and failed because of an mISDN API mismatch.
  Need to take another look.
* asterisk-gui needs to be uploaded; Tzafrir?
* are we going to upload ARI? If not, we should drop it from our SVN.
* zaptel is in a good status and it's the only package from the suite
  that is migrating to testing. Things TODO that come to mind are: a)
  fixing a bug which results in /lib/modules/2.6.foo/modules.* files in
  amd64 and b) evaluate a switch to OSLEC as the default echo
  cancellator. Tzafrir is doing an excellent job on maintaining this
  package by himself :)
* Right now, we are shipping asterisk-sounds-main which is the main
  asterisk sounds in English in GSM format -- exactly as shipped in the
  original tarball by Digium. Kilian, Tzafrir and me were pondering on
  the idea of shipping separately all sounds as shipped by Digium in all
  formats (besides WAV), each in a separate package. This should serve
  our users better but has an obvious problem of size. This is not
  decided yet.

ABI issues
--
Most -if not all- of these plugins build-depend on asterisk-dev i.e. use
Asterisk's development headers. These headers are tied to the ABI and
this can only be expressed in dependencies manually.
asterisk-chan-capi was compiled with 1.2 asterisk-dev, had a = 1.2
dependency but segfaults on 1.4 (#441237). There are currently no
similar problems that I know of.
However, we should expect more of these when we transition to 1.6 which
will most probably have a different ABI.

I'm leaning towards a solution:
 * Add a Provides: asterisk-1.4 to asterisk.
 * Replace Depends: asterisk (= 1.4.0) (or similar) with Depends:
   asterisk-1.4 on all external modules.
This should help in *breaking*, dpkg-wise, the modules when a new
version is uploaded which in turn will prevent a new version from
entering testing until all plugins are recompiled.

pushing our work upstream
-
On the 1.4.11-1.4.12 cycle, I tried pushing all of our patches to
Digium's BTS (mantis). This has worked well since they're quite
responsive (contrary to our secondary upstream, Klaus-Peter 

Re: [asterisk-users] Where to download Junghanns ISDNguard software?

2007-10-04 Thread Sylvain Boily
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 12:13 +1000, Nick Richardson a écrit :
 What if you don't use or want to use bristuff? We use Digium PRI cards
 and don't need any of the BRIstuff

yep i know ... but res_watchdog is part of bristuff. My tarball have
just the res_watchdog module with a makefile. It's not necessary to
using bristuff :-)

Sylvain

 
 
 On 10/4/07, Sylvain Boily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Nick,
 
  For using ISDNGuard, you can using res_watchdog from the bristuff patch.
  I attach for you a version who have patched and work for asterisk
  1.2.24. It's an archive with a makefile with just res_watchdog.
  We have some clients who using this version from many month ago.
 
  Sylvain
 
  Le jeudi 04 octobre 2007 à 08:51 +1000, Nick Richardson a écrit :
   Hi list,
  
   I recently purchased an ISDNguard from Junghanns. It came with no
   software and there is no sign on their website or in any of their
   documentation where to download it. I have looked in
   http://www.junghanns.net/downloads/ and there is no sign of it there
   either. The only thing remotly close ther is
   isdnguard-asterisk-1.2.13.patch. Their documentation refers to
   /usr/sbin/ISDNguard. Where does one get this mysterious binary from?
  
   I have emailed their support a few times and get no response, needless
   to say I am NOT a happy customer.
  
   Can anyone help me with a download link?
  
   Thanks in advance..
  
   - Nick
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  --
  Sylvain BOILY
  Proformatique - 67 rue Voltaire - 92800 Puteaux
  Tel. : 01 41 38 99 64 - Fax. : 01 41 38 99 70
  Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://proformatique.com/
 
  Vers un monde plus libre
  
  Proformatique est membre de l'ASS2L
  http://www.ass2L.org
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
-- 
Sylvain BOILY
Proformatique - 67 rue Voltaire - 92800 Puteaux
Tel. : 01 41 38 99 64 - Fax. : 01 41 38 99 70
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://proformatique.com/

Vers un monde plus libre

Proformatique est membre de l'ASS2L
http://www.ass2L.org


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users