Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
As I said before.  I would like to see a much more comprehensive survey 
complete with names or nicknames if supplied.  Asterisk version, 
in-house patches or programming, OS, preferred hardware (server, phones, 
cards)  Then more bio on the respondent.  Years in data and also 
telephony field, other phone systems certified or capable of deploying 
or servicing.  Number of installs, number of stations/trunks, function 
of deployments.  Maybe even an breakdown on age group as well as general 
comments.

If $9 can put that survey together in a comprehensible set of questions 
and results, I will pay the $9.

Thanks,
Steve
888.777.1888

randulo wrote:
 Yes, unless I pay $9, it's limited to 100 responses. The clear winner
 was debian, well after other. My fault for not limiting to multiple
 choice, but reading through the 100 comments is interesting.

 Maybe I can get Digium to kick in the money for a full survey :)

 regards,

 r
 On Nov 27, 2007 7:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Your form can no longer accept submissions.

 SuSe 10.1 with latest Asterisk 1.2 using our own patches.

 We are about ready to go live with new installations of SLES or CentOS
 + Asterisk 1.4 just need to work out the bugs.


 On Nov 26, 2007 5:14 AM, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,

 I'd like to invite all asterisk users to answer two questions on this form:

 http://food4wine.ning.com/poll

 1) What version do you use in production (1.2, 1.4 or both)
 2) and what distro(s)

 It'll just take a second and the results are public and live (link on
 the page above)

   
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread randulo
Well, $9 would pay for up to 500 answers. I also found a free one I'm
looking at now, but you never get anything really good free :)

 If $9 can put that survey together in a comprehensible set of questions
 and results, I will pay the $9.

Let me see if I can put what you ask for together on the free one and
post here in a bit.

r

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread randulo
NEW Asterisk favorite OS survey:

http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=1f38482e-c3fa-4384-8b8a-65a9f40b2cd8

The above is a compromise between three elements:
1) The amount of time and patience I have
2) The information I think most people are willing to proovide
3) Steve's requests

Please have at it. Steve, you can use this same setup free to design your own.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Darrick Hartman (lists)
randulo wrote:
 Well, $9 would pay for up to 500 answers. I also found a free one I'm
 looking at now, but you never get anything really good free :)
 
 If $9 can put that survey together in a comprehensible set of questions
 and results, I will pay the $9.
 
 Let me see if I can put what you ask for together on the free one and
 post here in a bit.
 
 r

Can you just install limesurvey on a server some place?  It would allow 
you to do however many future surveys you want to do.

Darrick
-- 
Darrick Hartman
DJH Solutions, LLC
http://www.djhsolutions.com

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4

2007-11-27 Thread Fernando Berretta

Julio,

Thanks for your suggestion, at this stage I would like this version of 
g729 running in my box.. but,,, is good to know the paid version works 
without any problems in this machine for the next stage.


Best Regards,
Fernando

Julio Arruda wrote:

Fernando Berretta wrote:
  

Dear Mindaugas,

Thanks for your promt response

I've already tried this but.. it's not working,, what file do you think 
I should use ? any other idea ?




Fernando,
I've used the official/legal G729 codec sold at www.digium.com in Athlon 
boxes w/ asterisk 1.4 without problems, have you tried this option ?



  

Mindaugas Kezys wrote:

Rename to codec_g729.so 
http://asterisk.hosting.lv/bin/codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-athlon-sse.so 



Copy to /usr/lib/asterisk/modules

chmod 777 codec_g729.so

 


restart Asterisk

show translations

 


Mindaugas Kezys

http://www.kolmisoft.com

Advanced Billing for Asterisk PBX

 

*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
*Fernando Berretta

*Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2007 6:01 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec in Athlon 64 x2 Dual core 
processor 4000 + CENTOS 5 + Asterisk 1.4


 


Dear Mindaugas,

I've already download the folowing files for testing

codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-athlon-sse.so 
http://asterisk.hosting.lv/bin/codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-athlon-sse.so 

codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-core2.so 
http://asterisk.hosting.lv/bin/codec_g729-ast14-gcc4-glibc-core2.so
codec_g729-ast14-icc-glibc-x86_64-core2.so 
http://asterisk.hosting.lv/bin/codec_g729-ast14-icc-glibc-x86_64-core2.so 



But... no one of them seems to be working
  



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
Is there anything special that anyone here has had to do to get an Aastra
phone (on the Internet) to talk to Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

Ports 1-2 UDP are open on the PIX and forwarding to the Asterisk
server.   The Asterisk server's RTP.CONF is set to use 1-2.The
phone registers, and will place AND receive calls, however, no audio is
passed.   The phone is an Aastra 9133i.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread randulo
y the way, CentOS is winning at the moment. I don't see how to publish
the results live yet, but I'll do a static report as soon as there are
more.

On Nov 27, 2007 2:25 PM, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2007 2:06 PM, Darrick Hartman (lists)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can you just install limesurvey on a server some place?  It would allow
  you to do however many future surveys you want to do.

 I'll look into it for my own use, thanks. Wufoo is way ahead of most
 of these, but it ain't free, and I understand why. If I need a paid
 survey/poll tool I'll use them.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread randulo
On Nov 27, 2007 2:06 PM, Darrick Hartman (lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can you just install limesurvey on a server some place?  It would allow
 you to do however many future surveys you want to do.

I'll look into it for my own use, thanks. Wufoo is way ahead of most
of these, but it ain't free, and I understand why. If I need a paid
survey/poll tool I'll use them.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
 Is there anything special that anyone here has had to do to get an 
 Aastra phone (on the Internet) to talk to Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?
 
 Ports 1-2 UDP are open on the PIX and forwarding to the Asterisk 
 server.   The Asterisk server's RTP.CONF is set to use 1-2.
 The phone registers, and will place AND receive calls, however, no audio 
 is passed.   The phone is an Aastra 9133i.
 

Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
888.777.1888


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
 Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?


Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk has been
reloaded even restarted.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Sip to ATA?

2007-11-27 Thread Joe Acquisto
Currently running two POTS lines into an asterisk system.  Analog and SIP on 
premises.  Being in the sticks, the POTS service is abysmal for quality, 
especially in the rain.

Recently, cable has become available with VOIP phone.   The cost savings are 
attractive as it can replace several independent services for TV and internet 
(currently satellite).

But, I cannot get much out of them, regarding how the phone service works.  All 
I can get is I plug my existing phones and answering machines into the back of 
the cable modem and am good to go.

I am hesitant to believe that I can simply plug my TDM400P (2fxo/2fxs) into 
these (ATA ?) jacks and call it good.

Any insight?  Am I better off ignoring their phone offering and setting myself 
up with an IAX or SIP provider? (and surplus-ing the card).   I would end up 
needing more than their single line offering with a second line at $30/month 
(USD).  Seems that might make more sense

joe a.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Zaheer K. Master
Hi all,

I have *NOW beta 6 (asterisk 1.4.5) and I've configured it with a SIP trunk
line. I can make outgoing calls, but I cannot receive any incoming calls. A
port scan of my * server shows that port 5060 is closed. How do I open this
port? In my users.conf, I have set [trunk_1] to hassip=yes and port=5060. 

 

Also, in the global SIP.conf file

bindport=5060

bindaddr=0.0.0.0

allowexternaldomains=no

allowexternalinvites=no

 

Do I have to set allowexternalinvites or allowexternaldomains to yes to
accept INVITEs from my ITSP? I've already configured the system to allow
traffic from their IP address.

 

Thanks for the help!

 

Regards,

Zaheer

 

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
 
 
 
 Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ? 
 
  
 Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk has been 
 reloaded even restarted.
 
 

Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the PIX? 
  If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.

I live OpenVPN bridges for double NAT situations, of course you could 
try IAX2 but I have seen too many sound quality issues surrounding IAX2 
so I try to stick with SIP, even if that means setting up VPNs.

Thanks,
Steve
888.777.1888

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk API Manager

2007-11-27 Thread Anthony Chapellier
Hi,

Does Asterisk manager allow multiple clients to connect to an Asterisk 
instance using the same user account ?

Thanks,

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the PIX?
  If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.

 I live OpenVPN bridges for double NAT situations, of course you could
 try IAX2 but I have seen too many sound quality issues surrounding IAX2
 so I try to stick with SIP, even if that means setting up VPNs.


This is a dual NAT situation.   PIX on Asterisk side, and Netgear on phone
side.  HOWEVER.The Asterisk box has it's own IP but it is being
tunneled through the PIX.I guess the PIX must be messing something up?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
 
 
 Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the
 PIX?
  If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.
 
 I live OpenVPN bridges for double NAT situations, of course you could
 try IAX2 but I have seen too many sound quality issues surrounding IAX2
 so I try to stick with SIP, even if that means setting up VPNs.
 
 
 This is a dual NAT situation.   PIX on Asterisk side, and Netgear on 
 phone side.  HOWEVER.The Asterisk box has it's own IP but it is 
 being tunneled through the PIX.I guess the PIX must be messing 
 something up?
 
 

It is being tunneled or forwarded?  Does the Asterisk box have a public 
IP or does the PIX have the public which just forwards to the private?

If it is just forwarding, it will never work without either putting one 
side on a public IP, using a VPN solution, or IAX2.

Thanks,
Steve
888.777.1888

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt

 This is a dual NAT situation.   PIX on Asterisk side, and Netgear on phone
 side.  HOWEVER.The Asterisk box has it's own IP but it is being
 tunneled through the PIX.I guess the PIX must be messing something up?



If I remove the phone from  behind the Netgear... then I get the audio from
the Asterisk PBX so traffic seems to be flowing but why would it not
get behind the firewalls?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
On Nov 27, 2007 9:59 AM, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This is a dual NAT situation.   PIX on Asterisk side, and Netgear on phone
  side.  HOWEVER.The Asterisk box has it's own IP but it is being
  tunneled through the PIX.I guess the PIX must be messing something up?
 


 If I remove the phone from  behind the Netgear... then I get the audio
 from the Asterisk PBX so traffic seems to be flowing but why would
 it not get behind the firewalls?


This is what I see on the debug:

etransmitting #6 (NAT) to 63.174.244.147:5060:
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 63.174.244.147;branch=z9hG4bK7e4d50af2;received=
63.174.244.147
From: Remote Test sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=c302787b4625316
To: 93372806 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=as1c9e4806
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1136993892 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 242

The From and To shouldn't be the same, though... should they?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
 This is a dual NAT situation.   PIX on Asterisk side, and Netgear on
 phone side.  HOWEVER.The Asterisk box has it's own IP but it
 is being tunneled through the PIX.I guess the PIX must be
 messing something up?
 
 
 
 If I remove the phone from  behind the Netgear... then I get the audio 
 from the Asterisk PBX so traffic seems to be flowing but why 
 would it not get behind the firewalls?
 


Trust me on this, I have tried almost everything to get it to work, the 
best you can hope for is one way audio in a dual NAT.

The answer has to do with where the packets are sent from and where they 
seem to be sent from.

If you are not familiar with OpenVPN, you should check it out.  It is a 
great piece of software and will solve your issues.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
888.777.1888


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt

 It is being tunneled or forwarded?  Does the Asterisk box have a public
 IP or does the PIX have the public which just forwards to the private?

 If it is just forwarding, it will never work without either putting one
 side on a public IP, using a VPN solution, or IAX2.


It IS being forwarded.   Asterisk has a private, and the PIX forwards... and
I do see what is happening.  Makes sense.   Guess it's going to have to run
over the VPN!
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Shlomo Dubrowin
Matt,

If your phone is using SIP, then you should enable sip inspection (7.x code
or above) or fixup sip (6.x code) and have a rule that allows source
(wherever you need) inbound on the outside interface to TCP 5060 (SIP
port).  The sip inspection or fixup should enable the proper ports for the
require RTP streams.  I had this working through an ASA at some point, but I
don't remember if both ends were doing NAT or only one end.  I don't know
the phone you are talking about, but you also might want to look into STUN
or ICE to get beyond the NAT Traversal issue, if that is what's causing the
problem.

In the Firewall log, are you seeing Denys? or drops?  Have you tried debug
sip on the firewall console?  I've been dealing with several ASA SIP issues
lately.  SIP trunking with NAT will certainly not work and there is a Cisco
Bug that my company discovered when setting up our PBX.

  Shlomo in Israel


On 11/27/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there anything special that anyone here has had to do to get an Aastra
 phone (on the Internet) to talk to Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

 Ports 1-2 UDP are open on the PIX and forwarding to the 
 Asteriskserver.   The
 Asterisk server's RTP.CONF is set to use 1-2.The phone
 registers, and will place AND receive calls, however, no audio is passed.
 The phone is an Aastra 9133i.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt

 Trust me on this, I have tried almost everything to get it to work, the
 best you can hope for is one way audio in a dual NAT.

 The answer has to do with where the packets are sent from and where they
 seem to be sent from.

 If you are not familiar with OpenVPN, you should check it out.  It is a
 great piece of software and will solve your issues.


Steve,
Thanks for the informationI guess we will go with VPN.   A little Sokris
board isn't that expensive to throw at each site.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Adrian Marsh
Zaheer,

 

If a netstat -an|grep -I LISTENING shows that a LISTENING port for
5060 is there, then the problem isn't Asterisk, but some firewall system
on the server is blocking access from outside.  If its not there, then
come back to the group..

 

Adrian Marsh

  



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zaheer K.
Master
Sent: 27 November 2007 14:21
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

 

Hi all,

I have *NOW beta 6 (asterisk 1.4.5) and I've configured it with a SIP
trunk line. I can make outgoing calls, but I cannot receive any incoming
calls. A port scan of my * server shows that port 5060 is closed. How do
I open this port? In my users.conf, I have set [trunk_1] to hassip=yes
and port=5060. 

 

Also, in the global SIP.conf file

bindport=5060

bindaddr=0.0.0.0

allowexternaldomains=no

allowexternalinvites=no

 

Do I have to set allowexternalinvites or allowexternaldomains to yes to
accept INVITEs from my ITSP? I've already configured the system to allow
traffic from their IP address.

 

Thanks for the help!

 

Regards,

Zaheer

 

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Adrian Marsh
Correction:

 

netstat -an|grep 5060

udp0  0 0.0.0.0:50600.0.0.0:*

 

Adrian Marsh

  



From: Adrian Marsh 
Sent: 27 November 2007 15:24
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

 

Zaheer,

 

If a netstat -an|grep -I LISTENING shows that a LISTENING port for
5060 is there, then the problem isn't Asterisk, but some firewall system
on the server is blocking access from outside.  If its not there, then
come back to the group..

 

Adrian Marsh

  



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zaheer K.
Master
Sent: 27 November 2007 14:21
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

 

Hi all,

I have *NOW beta 6 (asterisk 1.4.5) and I've configured it with a SIP
trunk line. I can make outgoing calls, but I cannot receive any incoming
calls. A port scan of my * server shows that port 5060 is closed. How do
I open this port? In my users.conf, I have set [trunk_1] to hassip=yes
and port=5060. 

 

Also, in the global SIP.conf file

bindport=5060

bindaddr=0.0.0.0

allowexternaldomains=no

allowexternalinvites=no

 

Do I have to set allowexternalinvites or allowexternaldomains to yes to
accept INVITEs from my ITSP? I've already configured the system to allow
traffic from their IP address.

 

Thanks for the help!

 

Regards,

Zaheer

 

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Ricardo Carvalho
Try to just open port 5060 for SIP signaling on the PIX and also enable the
INSPECT SIP rule. That way, your PIX firewall will inspect SIP signalling
and open the necessary UDP ports for the RTP.

If you have NAT uptream in the network, you should see if in the layer 4 the
IPs shown in the SIP messages got rewritten by its public IPs, it should
have, or else you'll never get it working right.


Regards,
Ricardo Carvalho.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Attended transfer to Queue

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Davies
Hi,

I will confess immediately that this is only tested on 1.2.24, and I
would be interested to know if it happens on 1.4, but I cannot find a
bug-tracker entry which represents this issue.

Consider a PSTN call which comes into asterisk, and is bridged to a
SIP phone. The phone operator then places the call on hold (hold music
plays) and a second call is made from this handset to a Queue...
Operator can now hear hold music from the queue.

The operator then completes the attended transfer, bridging the
initial PSTN call to the Queue.

The system sees a transfer being completed, and stops MOH on both of
the channels. This means that the caller is correctly transferred to a
queue, but the MOH has been stopped, and they hear silence.

While this behaviour is expected, it is not ideal and if anyone
can point me at a workaround, or an existing bug-tracker entry, I
would be most grateful.

Thanks,
Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Finding the status of an extension

2007-11-27 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello,

  I would like to check whether an extension is busy or not before calling the
Dial() application to it (for example - to play a Busy if it is on
conversation).

  How do I check it? In the trunk version there was a function
DEVSTATE(SIP/123), however it does not exist on version 1.4.13... What is the
equivalent of it?

  Thanks, __Yehavi:

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk API Manager

2007-11-27 Thread Moises Silva
Yes, but you should use astmanproxy instead and don't bother Asterisk
with multiple manager connections.

On Nov 27, 2007 8:24 AM, Anthony Chapellier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 Does Asterisk manager allow multiple clients to connect to an Asterisk
 instance using the same user account ?

 Thanks,

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Within C++, there is a much smaller and cleaner language struggling
to get out.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Voice mail Uniden UIP-200 phones

2007-11-27 Thread Lyle Giese
Yep, that fixed it. Just shaking my head as to why the behavior changed...

Lyle

CunningPike wrote:
 Try dtmfmode=inband

 CP

 Lyle Giese wrote:
   
 I had a working system using * 1.0 and then 1.2 and now Asterisk 1.4.13
 with addons 1.4.4, zaptel 1.4.6, libpri 1.4.2.  I have a mix of
 Grandstream (GXP2000), Uniden uip-200, Linksys Wireless G, and analog
 phones via Adtran chan bank.  When I went to * 1.4.13, the Uniden phones
 stopped being able to login to voicemail.  All phones are on same lan
 with Asterisk.

 I get 'Login incorrect' from Allison.  I go to any other phone and I can
 log in just fine.  Just not from our two Uniden phones.  I have no
 problem placing calls.  In the messages log, I see:

 app_voicemail.c: Unable to read password
 or
 app_voicemail.c:Couldn't read username

 Again, going to a different phone other than one of my two Uniden phones
 and no problem accessing and retreiving voicemail.

 In sip.conf against the UIP-200's I have:

 nat=never
 dtmfmode=rfc2833


 Otherwise, I stayed with the standard Uniden provided config files
 served up via tftp and only made the minimum required changes to config
 files in Asterisk.  I am running firmware 4.77(also tried downgrading
 firmware on phones to 4.63).

 Any suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Lyle Giese


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
Shlomo,
My understanding is I have to do a no fixup sip 5060.  This from Cisco.
Without doing the no fixup the registration ports get all mangled.

On Nov 27, 2007 10:11 AM, Shlomo Dubrowin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Matt,

 If your phone is using SIP, then you should enable sip inspection (7.xcode or 
 above) or fixup sip (
 6.x code) and have a rule that allows source (wherever you need) inbound
 on the outside interface to TCP 5060 (SIP port).  The sip inspection or
 fixup should enable the proper ports for the require RTP streams.  I had
 this working through an ASA at some point, but I don't remember if both ends
 were doing NAT or only one end.  I don't know the phone you are talking
 about, but you also might want to look into STUN or ICE to get beyond the
 NAT Traversal issue, if that is what's causing the problem.

 In the Firewall log, are you seeing Denys? or drops?  Have you tried debug
 sip on the firewall console?  I've been dealing with several ASA SIP issues
 lately.  SIP trunking with NAT will certainly not work and there is a Cisco
 Bug that my company discovered when setting up our PBX.

   Shlomo in Israel


 On 11/27/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Is there anything special that anyone here has had to do to get an
  Aastra phone (on the Internet) to talk to Asterisk behind a PIXfirewall?
 
  Ports 1-2 UDP are open on the PIX and forwarding to the 
  Asteriskserver.   The
  Asterisk server's RTP.CONF is set to use 1-2.The phone
  registers, and will place AND receive calls, however, no audio is passed.
  The phone is an Aastra 9133i.
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Wendell Hamilton
You can also create the vpn using the existing pix and netgear, eliminating 
more hardware and points of failure. 

- Original Message - 
From: Ricardo Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:30:35 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles 
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall? 

Try to just open port 5060 for SIP signaling on the PIX and also enable the 
INSPECT SIP rule. That way, your PIX firewall will inspect SIP signalling and 
open the necessary UDP ports for the RTP. 

If you have NAT uptream in the network, you should see if in the layer 4 the 
IPs shown in the SIP messages got rewritten by its public IPs, it should have, 
or else you'll never get it working right. 


Regards, 
Ricardo Carvalho. 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Zaheer K. Master
Hi Adrian here is what I got when I ran the command you suggested:
netstat -an|grep 5060
udp0  0 0.0.0.0:50600.0.0.0:*

I also ran netstat -l and got the following:
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address   Foreign Address State
tcp0  0 *:4000  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:nfs   *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:8003  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:8004  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:1001  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:mysql *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:43724 *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:5038  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:sunrpc*:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:sieve *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:http  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:ftp   *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:h323hostcall  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:8088  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:smtp  *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:https *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:46302 *:* LISTEN
tcp0  0 *:ssh   *:* LISTEN
udp0  0 *:32768 *:*
udp0  0 *:nfs   *:*
udp0  0 *:32770 *:*
udp0  0 *:2727  *:*
udp0  0 *:4520  *:*
udp0  0 *:5060  *:*
udp0  0 *:715   *:*
udp0  0 *:4569  *:*
udp0  0 *:998   *:*
udp0  0 *:sunrpc*:*
udp0  0 192.168.1.55:ntp*:*
udp0  0 localhost.localdoma:ntp *:*
udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*
udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*

So does this mean that port 5060 is not listening for traffic?

Thanks again,
Zaheer


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread C F
On Nov 27, 2007 9:08 AM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Matt wrote:
 
 
 
  Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?
 
 
  Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk has been
  reloaded even restarted.
 
 

 Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the PIX?
   If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.


I disagree with you, setting in sip.conf:
externhost=ddnsname;or set the next setting
externip=x.x.x.x;external ip
externrefresh=10;for dns
localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
should take care of this, I have never had a problem with dual nat
like this, using Aastra, Cisco, Polycom and linksys.


 I live OpenVPN bridges for double NAT situations, of course you could
 try IAX2 but I have seen too many sound quality issues surrounding IAX2
 so I try to stick with SIP, even if that means setting up VPNs.

 Thanks,
 Steve

 888.777.1888

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
Enabling the fixup breaks the registration.

On Nov 27, 2007 10:30 AM, Ricardo Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Try to just open port 5060 for SIP signaling on the PIX and also enable
 the INSPECT SIP rule. That way, your PIX firewall will inspect SIP
 signalling and open the necessary UDP ports for the RTP.

 If you have NAT uptream in the network, you should see if in the layer 4
 the IPs shown in the SIP messages got rewritten by its public IPs, it should
 have, or else you'll never get it working right.


 Regards,
 Ricardo Carvalho.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Finding the status of an extension

2007-11-27 Thread Atis Lezdins
Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
 Hello,
 
   I would like to check whether an extension is busy or not before calling the
 Dial() application to it (for example - to play a Busy if it is on
 conversation).
 
   How do I check it? In the trunk version there was a function
 DEVSTATE(SIP/123), however it does not exist on version 1.4.13... What is the
 equivalent of it?

http://www.asterisk.org/node/48360

Btw, you can use also g flag of Dial() so, that call will continue, and 
you will get BUSY status instantly.

Regards,
Atis

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Stephan Seitz

Hi!

I have the following questions/problems with * 1.4.
We have several Snom phones (320 and 360). Hints are configured in 
extensions.conf (core show hints shows the correct values). My Snom phone 
is registered to some numbers (validated by using sip show 
subscriptions). I see the lights blinking if someone calls the subscribed 
number and steady lights if the call is established.


So far, so good. What I want now is that I can see the number of the 
caller in my display and can pickup the call by pressing the blinking 
lights. I can pickup the call using the pickup extension.


IIRC there is some pickup magic with Snom firmware 7.x. But this doesn’t 
solve my problem with the missing number in the display.


A little example:
Person A calls Person B. I am subscribed to B’s number. My Snom light is 
blinking. Now I want to see the number and be able to pickup the call. If 
I can restrict this bevaviour with pickupgroups, this would be great.


When I used * 1.2, the example above would result in the displayed 
message „From B to B” in the phone which was quite useless (I don’t see 
who called), but by pressing the blinking light I could pickup the call.


This is a part of my sip.conf for a snom phone:
[404]
type=friend
context=sip
callerid=”Stephan Seitz” 404
username=404
secret=secret
host=dynamic
defaultip=10.10.30.103
canreinvite=no
mailbox=404
vmexten=1404
call-limit=1
useclientcode=yes
subscribecontext = sip
notifyringing = yes
notifyhold=yes
dtmfmode = rfc2833

Any hints how to solve the problem are welcome.

Shade and sweet water!

Stephan

--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Restricting the manager interface to a number?

2007-11-27 Thread Stephan Seitz

Hi!

Some persons are using a TAPI driver to connect via the manager interface 
to the asterisk (1.4). While I can give every user his own password, 
I didn’t find a way to restrict a user to a certain phone number, so that 
he can only dial with his number via the TAPI driver and can only answer 
calls for another number.


Is the possible? If yes, how?

Thanks for the answers.

Shade and sweet water!

Stephan

--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Zaheer K. Master
Hi Adrian here is what I got when I ran the command you suggested:

netstat -an|grep 5060

udp0  0 0.0.0.0:50600.0.0.0:*

 

I also ran netstat -l and got the following:

Active Internet connections (only servers)

Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address   Foreign Address State

tcp0  0 *:4000  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:nfs   *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:8003  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:8004  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:1001  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:mysql *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:43724 *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:5038  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:sunrpc*:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:sieve *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:http  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:ftp   *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:h323hostcall  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:8088  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:smtp  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:https *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:46302 *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:ssh   *:* LISTEN

udp0  0 *:32768 *:*

udp0  0 *:nfs   *:*

udp0  0 *:32770 *:*

udp0  0 *:2727  *:*

udp0  0 *:4520  *:*

udp0  0 *:5060  *:*

udp0  0 *:715   *:*

udp0  0 *:4569  *:*

udp0  0 *:998   *:*

udp0  0 *:sunrpc*:*

udp0  0 192.168.1.55:ntp*:*

udp0  0 localhost.localdoma:ntp *:*

udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*

udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*

 

So does this mean that port 5060 is not listening for traffic?

 

Thanks again,

Zaheer

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Stephan Seitz wrote:

 We have several Snom phones (320 and 360). Hints are configured in 
 extensions.conf (core show hints shows the correct values). My Snom phone 
 is registered to some numbers (validated by using sip show 
 subscriptions). I see the lights blinking if someone calls the subscribed 
 number and steady lights if the call is established.
 
 So far, so good. What I want now is that I can see the number of the 
 caller in my display and can pickup the call by pressing the blinking 
 lights. I can pickup the call using the pickup extension.
 
 IIRC there is some pickup magic with Snom firmware 7.x. But this doesn’t 
 solve my problem with the missing number in the display.

Asterisk is not able to do that. I once wrote a patch for
it (see bug 5014) which was not checked in.

However picking up the call by pressing the button can
be done with the Snom phones.

Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
C F wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2007 9:08 AM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Matt wrote:


 Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?


 Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk has been
 reloaded even restarted.


 Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the PIX?
   If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.

 
 I disagree with you, setting in sip.conf:
 externhost=ddnsname;or set the next setting
 externip=x.x.x.x;external ip
 externrefresh=10;for dns
 localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
 should take care of this, I have never had a problem with dual nat
 like this, using Aastra, Cisco, Polycom and linksys.
 

You are probably right.  I think the first and last time I attempted 
double NATs, there was no sip.conf, I have to keep up with the times, 
lol.  Worth a shot.  I still like the OpenVPN solution for security and 
other added benefits.

 
 I live OpenVPN bridges for double NAT situations, of course you could
 try IAX2 but I have seen too many sound quality issues surrounding IAX2
 so I try to stick with SIP, even if that means setting up VPNs.

 Thanks,
 Steve

 888.777.1888


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Matt wrote:

 Shlomo,
 My understanding is I have to do a no fixup sip 5060.  This from Cisco.
 Without doing the no fixup the registration ports get all mangled.

So yet another router with a broken SIP ALG... (Juniper NetScreen is one I 
had issues with)

Gordon

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Steve Totaro wrote:
 C F wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2007 9:08 AM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Matt wrote:

 Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?


 Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk has been
 reloaded even restarted.


 Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the PIX?
   If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.

 I disagree with you, setting in sip.conf:
 externhost=ddnsname;or set the next setting
 externip=x.x.x.x;external ip
 externrefresh=10;for dns
 localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
 should take care of this, I have never had a problem with dual nat
 like this, using Aastra, Cisco, Polycom and linksys.

 
 You are probably right.  I think the first and last time I attempted 
 double NATs, there was no sip.conf, I have to keep up with the times, 
 lol.  Worth a shot.  I still like the OpenVPN solution for security and 
 other added benefits.

Sorry, those options were not available in sip.conf is what I meant to say.

 
 I live OpenVPN bridges for double NAT situations, of course you could
 try IAX2 but I have seen too many sound quality issues surrounding IAX2
 so I try to stick with SIP, even if that means setting up VPNs.

 Thanks,
 Steve

 888.777.1888
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Davies
On 11/27/07, Stephan Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]

 So far, so good. What I want now is that I can see the number of the
 caller in my display and can pickup the call by pressing the blinking
 lights. I can pickup the call using the pickup extension.

Hi,

I would first ask yourself what you expect to happen if (for example)
you have a snom sidecar, and there are 42 lights all blinking at the
same time? I do not think that your feature request stands the
usability test :)

Even in the much simpler case of 2 calls coming in at once, how do you
associate the numbers on the screen to the correct buttons?

What if the ringing-hint is flashing for 2 or more simultaneous calls
(which is quite possible) - Which one is indicated, and how do you
choose which one to pick-up?

Perhaps snom have come up with some fantastic method of dealing with
this. Given the space available on their LCD - I personally doubt it!

Just my 2p.
Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] hostname in MySQL CDR records

2007-11-27 Thread Anthony Messina
On Thursday 01 November 2007 12:57:10 am Steve Edwards wrote:
 On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Jim Gottlieb wrote:
  I would like to send the CDR records from all our machines around the
  world to a single database.  But I need the hostname included with each
  record for monitoring purposes.
 
  Is there a better way than using the userfield and adding
  SetCDRUserfield for every call to set the userfield to the name of the
  host?

 Personally, I think the userfield is a hack. I prefer to add properly
 named columns to the cdrs table using cdr_addon_mysql. It makes everything
 so much more obvious -- especially when you don't have to cram several
 values into the singularly obtuse userfield.

i'm sure i'm missing something.  i, too, would like to add custom fields using 
cdr_addon_mysql, but how and where would i define them?  can i add a 
[mappings] section to the cdr_mysql.conf file?

-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt
On Nov 27, 2007 11:02 AM, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Nov 27, 2007 9:08 AM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Matt wrote:
  
  
  
   Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?
  
  
   Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk has been
   reloaded even restarted.
  
  
 
  Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at the PIX?
If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio though.
 

 I disagree with you, setting in sip.conf:
 externhost=ddnsname;or set the next setting
 externip=x.x.x.x;external ip
 externrefresh=10;for dns
 localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
 should take care of this, I have never had a problem with dual nat
 like this, using Aastra, Cisco, Polycom and linksys.


LO!  This worked!  All it needed was an externip entry!
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Finding the status of an extension

2007-11-27 Thread Andre Courchesne - Consultant
Hi,

  Here is a small AGI script that get you the hint status of the extension 
simply call AGI(script.agi,SIP/100)

!/usr/bin/perl
#
# page.agi - Original file was allpage.agi by Rob Thomas 2005.
#   With parts of allcall.agi Original file by John Baker
#   Modified by Adam Boeglin to allow for paging sccp phones
#Modified/Updated by Jeremy Betts 6/1/2006 for improved efficiency..
#   We now use AGI to set the dialplan variable.. much smarter!
#Modifier by Andre Courchesne 11-27-2007 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
#   Modified to return the hint status of a single extension
#   Tested with SIP extension only
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of Version 2 of the GNU General
# Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
#
# This works with both my aastra, polycom, sipura/linksys and cisco sccp phones.
# It should be easily modified for other sip phones
#
# Documentation:
#  Simply returns channel variable MYSTATE
#   0: Extension is busy
#   1: Extension is available
#
#
#
use Asterisk::AGI;
$AGI = new Asterisk::AGI;

@bypass = @ARGV;

@sips = `sudo /usr/sbin/asterisk -rx show hints | grep -a $bypass[0]`;


#foreach $sipline (@sips)
#{
#   print Noop $sipline\n;
#}
#print Noop ---\n;
#foreach $argline (@bypass)
#{
#   print Noop $argline\n;
#}


$mystate=0;

my ($junk0, $junk1, $junk2, $exten, $state, $junk2) = split(/ +/, $sips[0],6);
my ($type, $extension) = split(/\//,$chan,2);
print Noop Comparing [.$exten.] and [.$bypass[0].] $state\n;

if($state eq State:Idle)
{
  $mystate=1;
  print Noop Found extension $exten to be Idle\n;
}

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Restricting the manager interface to a number?

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Stephan Seitz wrote:

 Some persons are using a TAPI driver to connect via the manager interface 
 to the asterisk (1.4). While I can give every user his own password, 
 I didn’t find a way to restrict a user to a certain phone number, so that 
 he can only dial with his number via the TAPI driver and can only answer 
 calls for another number.
 
 Is the possible?

No.

Currently this type of restriction needs to be done in whatever
proxy script you use to connect to the AMI.


Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Steve Davies wrote:
 On 11/27/07, Stephan Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 [snip]
 
 So far, so good. What I want now is that I can see the number of the
 caller in my display and can pickup the call by pressing the blinking
 lights. I can pickup the call using the pickup extension.
 
 Hi,
 
 I would first ask yourself what you expect to happen if (for example)
 you have a snom sidecar, and there are 42 lights all blinking at the
 same time? I do not think that your feature request stands the
 usability test :)
 
 Even in the much simpler case of 2 calls coming in at once, how do you
 associate the numbers on the screen to the correct buttons?
 
 What if the ringing-hint is flashing for 2 or more simultaneous calls
 (which is quite possible) - Which one is indicated, and how do you
 choose which one to pick-up?
 
 Perhaps snom have come up with some fantastic method of dealing with
 this. Given the space available on their LCD - I personally doubt it!

All he's asking for are SIP NOTIFYs of the extension state with
dialog-info XML in the body as described in RFC 4235 and elsewhere.

It's up to the SIP user agent (i.e. the phone) how to deal with it.
(e.g. display only the first or last message if the screen is too
small ...)

Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Finding the status of an extension

2007-11-27 Thread Ricardo Carvalho
If you have some SIP phone BLF feature capable, you can try it. With it in
the phone you can view the state of those the registered extensions you
like, as well with it if you do sip show subscriptions in the asterisk
CLI, you'll get the list of extensions and the last state of those monitored
extensions.


Regards,
Ricardo Carvalho.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk API Manager

2007-11-27 Thread Anthony Chapellier
However I wanted to get periodic infos about queued users (position in 
queue) only. So I thought I could make a program sending periodic 
requests to asterisk manager. Is it really bad to bother asterisk 
manager with frequently and periodic requests sent by mutiple users (we 
could say maybe 100 users with a request every minute) ?

Moises Silva a écrit :
 Yes, but you should use astmanproxy instead and don't bother Asterisk
 with multiple manager connections.

 On Nov 27, 2007 8:24 AM, Anthony Chapellier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Hi,

 Does Asterisk manager allow multiple clients to connect to an Asterisk
 instance using the same user account ?

 Thanks,

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 



   

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Davies
On 11/27/07, Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 All he's asking for are SIP NOTIFYs of the extension state with
 dialog-info XML in the body as described in RFC 4235 and elsewhere.

 It's up to the SIP user agent (i.e. the phone) how to deal with it.
 (e.g. display only the first or last message if the screen is too
 small ...)

...and I was pointing out that in most cases, there is no point in
asking for this feature, because there is often no useful way of
presenting the information if you have it. :)

Steve

PS. The bristuff patch updates asterisk to send the extra notify
information in a snom-happy format.
PPS. Directed pickup on Aastra phones is broken if a full NOTIFY is
sent using the bristuff patch.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
 
 
 On Nov 27, 2007 11:02 AM, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On Nov 27, 2007 9:08 AM, Steve Totaro
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Matt wrote:
   
   
   
Just checking  NAT=yes, canreinvite=no ?
   
   
Correct, I have those settings set for this phone.  Asterisk
 has been
reloaded even restarted.
   
   
  
   Is this a dual NAT situation?  NAT on the phone side and NAT at
 the PIX?
 If so, I fear it will never work, you might get one way audio
 though.
  
 
 I disagree with you, setting in sip.conf:
 externhost=ddnsname;or set the next setting
 externip=x.x.x.x;external ip
 externrefresh=10;for dns
 localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 http://192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
 should take care of this, I have never had a problem with dual nat
 like this, using Aastra, Cisco, Polycom and linksys.
 
 
 LO!  This worked!  All it needed was an externip entry!
 
 

This is good to hear.  Now I know it can be done this way, although I 
still prefer OpenVPN for it's security and ability to let you do other 
things such as AMI or whatever.

It is kind of hard to portscan 5060 when it is not open.  I bet I could 
do a portscan on 5060 and of those hits try username 100 password 100 
all the way up to  and eventually get some toll fraud access in a 
day's time.

Thanks,
Steve


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt

 This is good to hear.  Now I know it can be done this way, although I
 still prefer OpenVPN for it's security and ability to let you do other
 things such as AMI or whatever.

 It is kind of hard to portscan 5060 when it is not open.  I bet I could
 do a portscan on 5060 and of those hits try username 100 password 100
 all the way up to  and eventually get some toll fraud access in a
 day's time.


GADS!  I hope not!  We are using fairly complex passwords :)
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Sip to ATA?

2007-11-27 Thread Jacob Lefkowitz
Yes, you would just plug the FXO ports directly into the cable modem and it 
would work.  In my experience the cable media gateways (Arris and Motorola) 
are more robust than VoIP ATAs.  They can provide polarity reversal on 
disconnect, can power a higher REN, and even have built-in batteries to keep 
the phones running when the power goes out (the battery only powers the 
phones, not the Internet connection).  YMMV based on your local cable co's 
implementation.

From a financial standpoint, I think you would be better off with a SIP/IAX 
trunk, because cable telephone service is taxed just like regular POTS 
service, adding 40%+ to the bill.

- Original Message - 
From: Joe Acquisto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Sip to ATA?


 Currently running two POTS lines into an asterisk system.  Analog and SIP 
 on premises.  Being in the sticks, the POTS service is abysmal for 
 quality, especially in the rain.

 Recently, cable has become available with VOIP phone.   The cost savings 
 are attractive as it can replace several independent services for TV and 
 internet (currently satellite).

 But, I cannot get much out of them, regarding how the phone service works. 
 All I can get is I plug my existing phones and answering machines into the 
 back of the cable modem and am good to go.

 I am hesitant to believe that I can simply plug my TDM400P (2fxo/2fxs) 
 into these (ATA ?) jacks and call it good.

 Any insight?  Am I better off ignoring their phone offering and setting 
 myself up with an IAX or SIP provider? (and surplus-ing the card).   I 
 would end up needing more than their single line offering with a second 
 line at $30/month (USD).  Seems that might make more sense

 joe a.


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Ira
At 05:26 AM 11/27/2007, you wrote:
By the way, CentOS is winning at the moment. I don't see how to publish
the results live yet, but I'll do a static report as soon as there are
more.

Not much of a surprise, TrixBox and it's predecessors all installed 
CentOS by default and all the people like me for whom Asterisk was 
their first ever Linux install likely ended up with CentOS.  No clue 
if it's the best, but it works, it's my phones and I've no reason to 
mess with it.

Ira 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Sip to ATA?

2007-11-27 Thread Ira
At 06:01 AM 11/27/2007, you wrote:

I am hesitant to believe that I can simply plug my TDM400P 
(2fxo/2fxs) into these (ATA ?) jacks and call it good.

Any insight?  Am I better off ignoring their phone offering and 
setting myself up with an IAX or SIP provider? (and surplus-ing the 
card).   I would end up needing more than their single line offering 
with a second line at $30/month (USD).  Seems that might make more sense

That's what I use other than I have the 4 FXO TDM400 and it works 
just fine. What I got was a cable modem with 2 POTs jacks. They cut 
me free from the outside world at the box and plugged the modem into 
a wall jack and my Asterisk box. No apparent change in the working of anything.

Ira 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] hostname in MySQL CDR records

2007-11-27 Thread Ricardo Carvalho
You can also use CDR(userfield) parameter and that way you can write in the
column userfield of your CDR table of the DB, the hostname of the asterisk
for each call. You can try something like the following in the dialplan of
each machine:

Set(CDR(userfield)=hostname_of_the_machine)

Regards,
Ricardo Carvalho.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Matt wrote:
 This is good to hear.  Now I know it can be done this way, although I
 still prefer OpenVPN for it's security and ability to let you do other
 things such as AMI or whatever.
 
 It is kind of hard to portscan 5060 when it is not open.  I bet I could
 do a portscan on 5060 and of those hits try username 100 password 100
 all the way up to  and eventually get some toll fraud access in a
 day's time.
 
 
 GADS!  I hope not!  We are using fairly complex passwords :)
 


No, then you are good, but I would bet my life that there are a good 
many systems that use the extension for both password and username and 
can be accessed from the net.

Thanks,
Steve


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Alex Balashov

Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the 
provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until 
it finds one that is available.

I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
acceptable from a business POV.

Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
go on to other T1s in the trunk group.

Any ideas?


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Alex Balashov

In other words, what I need is a way for the upstream switch to somehow 
think that the B channels are out of service, but without actually taking
the B channels out of service and dropping the existing calls.

From within asterisk, zaptel, wanpipe, whatever.  Is that possible?

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Alex Balashov wrote:


 Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the
 provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until
 it finds one that is available.

 I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
 box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
 box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
 acceptable from a business POV.

 Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
 the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
 interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
 go on to other T1s in the trunk group.

 Any ideas?


 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Matt



 No, then you are good, but I would bet my life that there are a good
 many systems that use the extension for both password and username and
 can be accessed from the net.


O yeah.. I can imagine.. wonder how many open systems are out there :)
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Sip to ATA?

2007-11-27 Thread Joe Acquisto
 On 11/27/2007 at 12:26 PM, Ira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 06:01 AM 11/27/2007, you wrote:
 
I am hesitant to believe that I can simply plug my TDM400P 
(2fxo/2fxs) into these (ATA ?) jacks and call it good.

Any insight?  Am I better off ignoring their phone offering and 
setting myself up with an IAX or SIP provider? (and surplus-ing the 
card).   I would end up needing more than their single line offering 
with a second line at $30/month (USD).  Seems that might make more sense
 

Thanks for both the replies.  Hope springs eternal.

joe a.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk behind a PIX firewall?

2007-11-27 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Steve Totaro wrote:
 Matt wrote:
 This is a dual NAT situation.   PIX on Asterisk side, and Netgear on
 phone side.  HOWEVER.The Asterisk box has it's own IP but it
 is being tunneled through the PIX.I guess the PIX must be
 messing something up?



 If I remove the phone from  behind the Netgear... then I get the audio 
 from the Asterisk PBX so traffic seems to be flowing but why 
 would it not get behind the firewalls?

 
 
 Trust me on this, I have tried almost everything to get it to work, the 
 best you can hope for is one way audio in a dual NAT.

I'm in a dual-NAT situation and it works ok... with Sipura ATAs, Linksys 
941 and 841, softphones, and one polycom 330.  I had to enable NAT keep 
alive on the Linksys/Sipuras.

Ugo


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Alex Balashov wrote:
 Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the 
 provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until 
 it finds one that is available.
 
 I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
 box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
 box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
 acceptable from a business POV.
 
 Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
 the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
 interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
 go on to other T1s in the trunk group.
 
 Any ideas?

I think if you just pull the plug the PRI goes to red alarm and
the provider will try one of your other PRIs for new incoming
calls. Of course I don't know how your provider will handle this
so don't trust me. :)


Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] ResetCDR Options v, a - Asterisk 1.4

2007-11-27 Thread Stefan Tichy

show application ResetCDR shows 3 option values which may be used.
w works as expected, but what about v and a?

v -- Save CDR variables  - but theese are saved anyway

a -- Store any stacked records - but what are stacked records?


I found some ResetCDR examples using option w or no option.
In which situation one of the other options does make sense?


Any help appreciated


-- 
Stefan Tichy  ( asterisk at pi4tel dot de )

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Alex Balashov


Well, right;  the problem is that this also drops the existing calls in 
progress.  :-)


On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Philipp Kempgen wrote:


Alex Balashov wrote:

Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the
provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until
it finds one that is available.

I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
acceptable from a business POV.

Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
go on to other T1s in the trunk group.

Any ideas?


I think if you just pull the plug the PRI goes to red alarm and
the provider will try one of your other PRIs for new incoming
calls. Of course I don't know how your provider will handle this
so don't trust me. :)


Regards,
 Philipp Kempgen

--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
   Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
 Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Philipp Kempgen wrote:

 I think if you just pull the plug the PRI goes to red alarm and
 the provider will try one of your other PRIs for new incoming
 calls. Of course I don't know how your provider will handle this
 so don't trust me. :)

The downside of this is that established calls would
be lost.


Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] hostname in MySQL CDR records

2007-11-27 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:50:09 am Ricardo Carvalho wrote:
 You can also use CDR(userfield) parameter and that way you can write in the
 column userfield of your CDR table of the DB, the hostname of the asterisk
 for each call. You can try something like the following in the dialplan of
 each machine:

 Set(CDR(userfield)=hostname_of_the_machine)

 Regards,
 Ricardo Carvalho.

that's what i do currently, but i was wondering if it was possible to have 
custom cdr fields in cdr_addon_mysql as it is when using csv files.

with a core show function CDR, it states:

  All of the above variables are read-only, except for accountcode,
  userfield, and amaflags. You may, however,  supply
  a name not on the above list, and create your own
  variable, whose value can be changed with this function,
  and this variable will be stored on the cdr.

but it seems like these create my own variables do not appear in mysql, 
though they do appear in the csv files.

-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Erik Anderson
You should be able to issue a stop gracefully command to asterisk.
That'll cause it to stop accepting new calls, but will let existing
calls continue until complete.

-erik

On Nov 27, 2007 12:06 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In other words, what I need is a way for the upstream switch to somehow
 think that the B channels are out of service, but without actually taking
 the B channels out of service and dropping the existing calls.

 From within asterisk, zaptel, wanpipe, whatever.  Is that possible?


 On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Alex Balashov wrote:

 
  Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the
  provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until
  it finds one that is available.
 
  I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
  box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
  box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
  acceptable from a business POV.
 
  Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
  the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
  interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
  go on to other T1s in the trunk group.
 
  Any ideas?
 
 
  --
  Alex Balashov
  Evariste Systems
  Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
  Tel: +1-678-954-0670
  Direct : +1-678-954-0671
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Erik Anderson
http://andersonfam.org

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Copy or Make + Make Install

2007-11-27 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi List;

If I have a running Asterisk on one machine and I need
to have another Asterisk on another machine, can I
copy the files from the first running Asterisk machine
to the new machine or I have to do the ./configure +
make + make install? 

If I can copy, then which directories (and files) need
to be copied?

What if my new machine have other kernel version that
first machine?

Regards
Bilal


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Generally, best practices would dictate that you do this while the 
business is closed if it is not a 24/7 operation.  I guess that kind of 
foresight comes with experience.

Glad to see things are going smoothly.

Thanks,
Steve



Erik Anderson wrote:
 You should be able to issue a stop gracefully command to asterisk.
 That'll cause it to stop accepting new calls, but will let existing
 calls continue until complete.
 
 -erik
 
 On Nov 27, 2007 12:06 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In other words, what I need is a way for the upstream switch to somehow
 think that the B channels are out of service, but without actually taking
 the B channels out of service and dropping the existing calls.

 From within asterisk, zaptel, wanpipe, whatever.  Is that possible?


 On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Alex Balashov wrote:

 Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the
 provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until
 it finds one that is available.

 I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
 box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
 box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
 acceptable from a business POV.

 Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
 the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
 interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
 go on to other T1s in the trunk group.

 Any ideas?


 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 
 
 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Semi-OT Part 2: Videophone

2007-11-27 Thread Ken Williams
Following the recommendations here I've ordered a couple different
Polycom  Aastra phones to play with speaker phones.
 
One of our next big projects is Video.  I know Grandstream has a video
phone, has anyone used it.  Anyone have any other recommendations?

Thanks,
Ken
(Who awaits the vmukti.com response.)
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
To answer the question, there is currently no way to busy out a channel 
except to put it in use.  There was some discussion about adding this 
feature at Astricon and on the list fairly recently.

Thanks,
Steve

Steve Totaro wrote:
 Generally, best practices would dictate that you do this while the 
 business is closed if it is not a 24/7 operation.  I guess that kind of 
 foresight comes with experience.
 
 Glad to see things are going smoothly.
 
 Thanks,
 Steve
 
 
 
 Erik Anderson wrote:
 You should be able to issue a stop gracefully command to asterisk.
 That'll cause it to stop accepting new calls, but will let existing
 calls continue until complete.

 -erik

 On Nov 27, 2007 12:06 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In other words, what I need is a way for the upstream switch to somehow
 think that the B channels are out of service, but without actually taking
 the B channels out of service and dropping the existing calls.

 From within asterisk, zaptel, wanpipe, whatever.  Is that possible?


 On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Alex Balashov wrote:

 Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the
 provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until
 it finds one that is available.

 I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
 box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
 box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
 acceptable from a business POV.

 Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
 the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
 interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
 go on to other T1s in the trunk group.

 Any ideas?


 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] hostname in MySQL CDR records

2007-11-27 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Anthony Messina wrote:
 with a core show function CDR, it states:
 
   All of the above variables are read-only, except for accountcode,
   userfield, and amaflags. You may, however,  supply
   a name not on the above list, and create your own
   variable, whose value can be changed with this function,
   and this variable will be stored on the cdr.
 
 but it seems like these create my own variables do not appear in mysql, 
 though they do appear in the csv files.

Correct.  Unless you are using the new adaptive odbc driver.

I actually use a patch in house for this, but its definitely a hack and
I normally just apply it manually.

Obviously it wasn't accepted into SVN, but we try to submit everything
we work on:

http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9424

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director
___

http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHTGrLDQNt8rg0Kp4RAqsUAJwLC0VfAi4a8ilrB+K0t564+r6GgACeI5o8
AUlI25dlKmJsNid6MQ42TNc=
=4s6G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

randulo wrote:
 NEW Asterisk favorite OS survey:
 
 http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=1f38482e-c3fa-4384-8b8a-65a9f40b2cd8
 
 The above is a compromise between three elements:
 1) The amount of time and patience I have
 2) The information I think most people are willing to proovide
 3) Steve's requests
 
 Please have at it. Steve, you can use this same setup free to design your own.

Where are the results?

Once I posted it just redirected to http://food4wine.ning.com/

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director
___

http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHTGw9DQNt8rg0Kp4RAmebAJ933Wmc9zIrZhoGUPB/cUwakYAQfgCdHpno
a94QpZAo5kFGlJ8txVeiBIE=
=oZmU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk API Manager

2007-11-27 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
So you'd be making 100 connections/minute, which is pretty relentless. 
That's like five connections, five requests sent, five responses 
received, and five disconnects, /every/ three seconds. 

And the likelihood of all 100 users to be spread out evenly over a 
minute doesn't seem very high.  I think your box would be pretty busy 
with that.

Astmanproxy would be indicated.

Moj


Anthony Chapellier wrote:
 However I wanted to get periodic infos about queued users (position in 
 queue) only. So I thought I could make a program sending periodic 
 requests to asterisk manager. Is it really bad to bother asterisk 
 manager with frequently and periodic requests sent by mutiple users (we 
 could say maybe 100 users with a request every minute) ?

 Moises Silva a écrit :
   
 Yes, but you should use astmanproxy instead and don't bother Asterisk
 with multiple manager connections.

 On Nov 27, 2007 8:24 AM, Anthony Chapellier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 
 Hi,

 Does Asterisk manager allow multiple clients to connect to an Asterisk
 instance using the same user account ?

 Thanks,

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 
   

   
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Semi-OT Part 2: Videophone

2007-11-27 Thread SIP
We've used the Grandstream video phone quite a bit, and I have to say, 
I'm considerably impressed with its quality.

YES, it's a Grandstream (and has the usual quirks and annoyances that 
one has come to expect now and again), but the quality of the screen and 
camera are both excellent, and with the later firmware handling H263 as 
well as H264, it meshes quite well with many of the software 
video-capable phones out there such as Ekiga and X-Lite v3/eyeBeam.


Sorry... no vmukti.com response from me, I'm afraid.

N.


Ken Williams wrote:
 Following the recommendations here I've ordered a couple different 
 Polycom  Aastra phones to play with speaker phones.
  
 One of our next big projects is Video.  I know Grandstream has a video 
 phone, has anyone used it.  Anyone have any other recommendations?

 Thanks,
 Ken
 (Who awaits the vmukti.com response.)
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
Results should be withheld until the end of the specified polling period.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
888.777.1888

Matt Riddell wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 randulo wrote:
   
 NEW Asterisk favorite OS survey:

 http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=1f38482e-c3fa-4384-8b8a-65a9f40b2cd8

 The above is a compromise between three elements:
 1) The amount of time and patience I have
 2) The information I think most people are willing to proovide
 3) Steve's requests

 Please have at it. Steve, you can use this same setup free to design your 
 own.
 

 Where are the results?

 Once I posted it just redirected to http://food4wine.ning.com/

 - --
 Kind Regards,

 Matt Riddell
 Director
 ___

 http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
 http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
 http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFHTGw9DQNt8rg0Kp4RAmebAJ933Wmc9zIrZhoGUPB/cUwakYAQfgCdHpno
 a94QpZAo5kFGlJ8txVeiBIE=
 =oZmU
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread randulo
On Nov 27, 2007 8:13 PM, Matt Riddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Where are the results?

Hey Matt,

As I said above, this site doesn't appear to allow public results
page. (Actually I said I couldn't find one)
I'll show the static one as soon as I can.

Wait, this is the Internet. I can go now. Ok, I'm back. This software
kinda sucks (great value for the price of zero, but that's it.)

There is no way to see the data except as a CSV. Sorry this is lame,
but here's the file. I'll update it tomorrow (it's night here ,now).

http://voipusersconference.org/poll/

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Zaptel 1.2.22 and 1.4.7 released

2007-11-27 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk.org development team has announced the release of Zaptel 
versions 1.2.22 and 1.4.7. These releases contain (among other things) 
many bug fixes to the TC400B driver, a bug fix on the wctdm24xxp driver 
for users with a VPM150M, as well as numerous improvements and fixes to 
the Xorcom driver suite.  The much better performing version of fxotune 
from 1.4 has now been put into 1.2, so you may wish to rerun this tool 
with the new version.  As always, please see the respective Changelogs 
for additional information.

Both releases are available as a tarball as well as a patch against the 
previous release. They are available for download from downloads.digium.com.

Thank you for your support!

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Steve Totaro
randulo wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2007 8:13 PM, Matt Riddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Where are the results?
 
 Hey Matt,
 
 As I said above, this site doesn't appear to allow public results
 page. (Actually I said I couldn't find one)
 I'll show the static one as soon as I can.
 
 Wait, this is the Internet. I can go now. Ok, I'm back. This software
 kinda sucks (great value for the price of zero, but that's it.)
 
 There is no way to see the data except as a CSV. Sorry this is lame,
 but here's the file. I'll update it tomorrow (it's night here ,now).
 
 http://voipusersconference.org/poll/
 

not ready yet!  LOL.  I like your style Randulo ;-)

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Copy or Make + Make Install

2007-11-27 Thread Carlos Rojas
Hello,

Only copy the configuration files, extensions.conf, sip.conf, iax.conf
,

Best regards



On Nov 27, 2007 1:27 PM, bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi List;

 If I have a running Asterisk on one machine and I need
 to have another Asterisk on another machine, can I
 copy the files from the first running Asterisk machine
 to the new machine or I have to do the ./configure +
 make + make install?

 If I can copy, then which directories (and files) need
 to be copied?

 What if my new machine have other kernel version that
 first machine?

 Regards
 Bilal



  
 
 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread randulo
On Nov 27, 2007 8:17 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Results should be withheld until the end of the specified polling period.

Gh!  Ok, I'll take 'em off.

We can give this a few days then , and when things stop, I'll publish.
Open to suggestions.

As far as the open source project mentioned earlier, you have to
register for it and I don't feel like installing something like this
on a server since it hasn't been touched in two years and is not
useful to me or myy customers. Wufoo, the original software used, is
really excellent. Too bad they insist on being paid for such good work
:) I will use them for a paying customer who needs this service.

I'll report the findings this Friday on the conference as well, obviously.

http://voipusersconference.org

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Zaheer K. Master
So can anyone tell me why the * server is not listening on UDP port 5060?

 

Thanks,

Zaheer

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zaheer K.
Master
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:20 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

 

Hi Adrian here is what I got when I ran the command you suggested:

netstat -an|grep 5060

udp0  0 0.0.0.0:50600.0.0.0:*

 

I also ran netstat -l and got the following:

Active Internet connections (only servers)

Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address   Foreign Address State

tcp0  0 *:4000  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:nfs   *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:8003  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:8004  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:1001  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:mysql *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:43724 *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:5038  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:sunrpc*:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:sieve *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:http  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:ftp   *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:h323hostcall  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:8088  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:smtp  *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:https *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:46302 *:* LISTEN

tcp0  0 *:ssh   *:* LISTEN

udp0  0 *:32768 *:*

udp0  0 *:nfs   *:*

udp0  0 *:32770 *:*

udp0  0 *:2727  *:*

udp0  0 *:4520  *:*

udp0  0 *:5060  *:*

udp0  0 *:715   *:*

udp0  0 *:4569  *:*

udp0  0 *:998   *:*

udp0  0 *:sunrpc*:*

udp0  0 192.168.1.55:ntp*:*

udp0  0 localhost.localdoma:ntp *:*

udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*

udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*

 

So does this mean that port 5060 is not listening for traffic?

 

Thanks again,

Zaheer

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Alex Balashov

Does a sip.conf exist? Asterisk won't start the SIP UAS if it is missing.

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Zaheer K. Master wrote:

 So can anyone tell me why the * server is not listening on UDP port 5060?



 Thanks,

 Zaheer



  _

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zaheer K.
 Master
 Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:20 AM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?



 Hi Adrian here is what I got when I ran the command you suggested:

 netstat -an|grep 5060

 udp0  0 0.0.0.0:50600.0.0.0:*



 I also ran netstat -l and got the following:

 Active Internet connections (only servers)

 Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address   Foreign Address State

 tcp0  0 *:4000  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:nfs   *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:8003  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:8004  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:1001  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:mysql *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:43724 *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:5038  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:sunrpc*:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:sieve *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:http  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:ftp   *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:h323hostcall  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:8088  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:smtp  *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:https *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:46302 *:* LISTEN

 tcp0  0 *:ssh   *:* LISTEN

 udp0  0 *:32768 *:*

 udp0  0 *:nfs   *:*

 udp0  0 *:32770 *:*

 udp0  0 *:2727  *:*

 udp0  0 *:4520  *:*

 udp0  0 *:5060  *:*

 udp0  0 *:715   *:*

 udp0  0 *:4569  *:*

 udp0  0 *:998   *:*

 udp0  0 *:sunrpc*:*

 udp0  0 192.168.1.55:ntp*:*

 udp0  0 localhost.localdoma:ntp *:*

 udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*

 udp0  0 *:ntp   *:*



 So does this mean that port 5060 is not listening for traffic?



 Thanks again,

 Zaheer







--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk version survey

2007-11-27 Thread Darrick Hartman
randulo wrote:
 On Nov 27, 2007 8:17 PM, Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Results should be withheld until the end of the specified polling period.
 
 Gh!  Ok, I'll take 'em off.
 
 We can give this a few days then , and when things stop, I'll publish.
 Open to suggestions.
 
 As far as the open source project mentioned earlier, you have to
 register for it and I don't feel like installing something like this
 on a server since it hasn't been touched in two years and is not
 useful to me or myy customers. Wufoo, the original software used, is

http://www.limesurvey.org/

Randy,

There must be something in the water (or wine) in France.  Nothing on 
the limesurvey site requires you to register for anything.  It is very 
current and updated about once a month (far from abandoned).  Perhaps 
someone else made a different suggestions.

Darrick
-- 
Darrick Hartman
DJH Solutions, LLC
http://www.djhsolutions.com

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Stephan Seitz

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:36:33PM +, Steve Davies wrote:

I would first ask yourself what you expect to happen if (for example)
you have a snom sidecar, and there are 42 lights all blinking at the
same time? I do not think that your feature request stands the
usability test :)


Well, of course if you want to monitor all lines in a call center, you 
will certainly have some problems. But in small environments this is 
working.


The ISDN PBX in our company building does the following:
- some phones in the office area are monitor phones for a range of 
  numbers (about 5);

- now one of these numbers are called:
  1. the phone with this number rings;
  2. if the call is not answered after a short time, a light (phone 
 layout is similiar to the Snom phones) begins to blink at the 
 monitor phones; caller ID and the target number are displayed; if 
 you press the button next to the blinking light, you pick-up the 
 call;
  3. still a little time later the monitor phones are additionally 
 ringing, but you still have to press the button to pick-up the call;
- and while others without monitor phones may see that a line is 
  ringing/busy, they are not allowed to take the call;


Any plans of getting rid of the building PBX shared by other companys as 
well and replacing it with Asterix (a wish to gain more independance) are 
not allowed in presenting fewer features. Those are the guidelines, now 
I’m testing.  If I can’t implement the old behaviour close enough, I will 
probably have to look at other solutions.


Shade and sweet water!

Stephan

--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Can Asterisk act like an ISP dialin server to data callls from Sipura 3000 or other ATA connected devices ?

2007-11-27 Thread Robert Rozman
Hi,

I have an older phone with touch screen from Philips. It have it connected
 to Sipura 3000 FXS port and majority of features work ok.

But phone also has touchscreen and web browser that I'd love to use for
 accessing my local web pages. But the phone only allows me to setup ISP
 phone number (username and password) and it wants to call it to get to 
Internet. Since it is
connected to Sipura3000, call can come to Asterisk and I'd love to somehow
fool that device and connect it to local web pages ?

I guess I could somehow mimic ISP internet calling feature on local 
Asterisk server, but have no
clue even where to start searching ...

 Any advice ?

 Thanks in advance,

 regards,

 Rob.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Zaheer K. Master
Yes I have a sip.conf, contents as follows:
[general]
context=default
allowoverlap=no
bindport=5060
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
srvlookup=yes
allowexternaldomains=no
allowexternalinvites=no
allowguest=no
allowsubscribe=no
allowtransfer=yes
alwaysauthreject=no
autodomain=no
callevents=no
canreinvite=nonat
compactheaders=no
dumphistory=no
externip=75.127.218.82
g726nonstandard=no
ignoreregexpire=no
jbenable=no
jbforce=no
jblog=no
localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0
maxcallbitrate=384
maxexpiry=3600
minexpiry=60
nat=yes
notifyringing=no
pedantic=no
promiscredir=no
recordhistory=yes
relaxdtmf=no
rtcachefriends=no
rtsavesysname=no
rtupdate=no
progressinband=no
sendrpid=no
sipdebug=yes
t1min=100
t38pt_udptl=no
trustrpid=no
usereqphone=no
videosupport=no
allow=ulaw
disallow=all

[authentication]

-Original Message-
Does a sip.conf exist? Asterisk won't start the SIP UAS if it is missing.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Restricting the manager interface to a number?

2007-11-27 Thread Stephan Seitz

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:

Currently this type of restriction needs to be done in whatever
proxy script you use to connect to the AMI.


Okay, thanks for the answer.

Shade and sweet water!

Stephan

--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Stephan Seitz wrote:

 The ISDN PBX in our company building does the following:
 - some phones in the office area are monitor phones for a range of 
numbers (about 5);

In Asterisk's terms that is a pickup group.

 - now one of these numbers are called:
1. the phone with this number rings;
2. if the call is not answered after a short time, a light (phone 
   layout is similiar to the Snom phones) begins to blink at the 
   monitor phones; caller ID and the target number are displayed; if 
   you press the button next to the blinking light, you pick-up the 
   call;

You could use one of the Snom pickup patches to have the
callerid transmitted. (Although as an Asterisk consultant
I would not recommend to use a patch.)
But there is probably no solution to the delay. The light
on the Snom would start to blink instantly. Not sure if
this comes close enough to the behavior of your old PBX.

3. still a little time later the monitor phones are additionally 
   ringing, but you still have to press the button to pick-up the call;
 - and while others without monitor phones may see that a line is 
ringing/busy, they are not allowed to take the call;

Maybe you could dial the extension for 60 seconds or something
and if they did not answer the phone put the call into a
queue with the r parameter (ring instead of MOH).

 Any plans of getting rid of the building PBX shared by other companys as 
 well and replacing it with Asterix (a wish to gain more independance) are 
 not allowed in presenting fewer features. Those are the guidelines, now 
 I’m testing.  If I can’t implement the old behaviour close enough, I will 
 probably have to look at other solutions.


Grüße,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Lost setting up IAXmodem after drive crash

2007-11-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz
A few weeks ago, I lost my Trixbox that was all set up with Hylafax and 
IAXmodem.

I am trying to set it up for

email  procmail  faxmail  iaxmodem  asterisk sipext  ATA (with 
attached fax).

I have followed all the instructions on creating the IAX extension and 
configuring the IAXmodem config file.  I can see the connection in Asterisk:

iax2 show peers
Name/UsernameHost Mask Port  
Status   
24729127.0.0.1   (D)  255.255.255.255  32770 
Unmonitored
1 iax2 peers [0 online, 0 offline, 1 unmonitored]


at this point I am SUPPOSE to be able to test with sendfax:

sendfax -d 2201 /etc/hylafax/hyla.conf

and nothing happens that I can tell.  I see some files in spool/hylafax:

ls docq/ -lstr
total 24
 4 -rw---  1 uucp 60002 1 Nov 27 15:04 seqf
 8 -rw-r-  1 uucp 60002  6636 Nov 27 15:04 doc1.ps
12 -rw-r-  1 uucp 60002 11264 Nov 27 15:04 cover1

Then I found in tmp:

cat tmp/ttyIAX0_last_wedged_email
1196204456

This is a temp file written and read by bin/wedged to rate-limit
the emails it sends about the wedged status of device /dev/ttyIAX0.

The first line contains a timestamp for when the last email was sent.

This file is never deleted automatically, there's no need to do it
and it may be useful to know when/if a device had last a problem.
However, you can safely delete it at any time if you wish, it will
be recreated when needed.

last modified: Tue Nov 27 18:00:56 EST 2007


What have I left out?



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for 100 Wifi SIP phone setup

2007-11-27 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Montag, den 26.11.2007, 22:39 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Nov 26, 2007 9:52 AM, Alberto Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I also found the Pirelli DP-L10 dual phone to be an excellent sip client
  with good roaming support and discrete battery saving capability.
  (Used in a 14-cell wifi network with 40 cellphones).
 
 I don't know what to say I have not used the Pirelli phone but at the
 same time it is the same ODM as most of the Linksys and D-Link phone
 and I have not been too pleased with those. They work. They roam ok
 but they also lock up every so often and the call quality isnt the
 best. You can tell the G729 codec is very taxing on the device it can
 take 2 sec for the phone to respond to a keypress.

Hello *,

I have the Pirelli phone (there are two actually, I have the bar-type
one, I think it's L10) in daily use, both GSM (O2 Germany) and WLAN
(registered to Asterisk of course - behind OpenWRT boxes, FritzBoxes,
D-Link APs whatever is there). I had the latest firmware in August,
did not check back since.

In my opinion, this phone is not ready for production use for regular
users. It works really nice in the short run, but a few things make it
unacceptable or at least lack for my approval as a well-done product:

- Connection loss on DHCP expiry (twice yet)
- Relatively poor Wifi signal strength, compared to other Wifi devices
- frequent lockups, which require battery removal and clock
reprogramming:
  - if you power on the phone while it is on charger power
  - if you receive a WIFI call while you have a WLAN call, and the WIFI
call is from the same contact in the phone book
  - plugging in, unplugging, plugging in headset fast in a row
- no SIP voicemail support, GSM voicebox only (pressing 1)
- slow user interface

It further lacks
- one-touch silent mode - you can only kind of emulate that
- proper headset support - any key accept call does _not_ work,
although it is a separate choice from accept key accept call.
Auto-accept works OK though. Vibra seems to _not_ work once a headset is
plugged in... or at least not always.
- one-digit press in main menu to open the menu: It works in the
submenues, but you always need to navigate the main menu with the arrow
controls
- quick mode switch WLAN on/off - if you are out of home range, WLAN
seems to suck lots of battery.
- display of CALLERID(name), currently only CALLERID(num) is displayed

I would also like a modus which is if no known network is in range,
connect to any unencrypted network you can get that seems to have
network connectivity. This should of course be optional.

That said, for my personal uses it is OK, lightyears in front of the two
UTStarcom phones I also had in daily use. Well, while they worked
anyway. Both the good WPA support (basically broken in the UTS) and the
GSM function make me like it. The phone book (multiple entries) is
great, although it would be nice to see from which of the numbers listed
the call is coming (call Sam back on his mobile, or is he at home?)

I believe most of the problems I see could be solved in software quite
easily, but until they are, I would not give it to my users, rather I
would go with DECT, Siemens Gigaset ISDN, on FritzBoxen internal S0 bus,
because this combination I know works absolutely perfect, as good as
ISDN, and that means a lot.

I have been using the Pirelli for five or six months, and keep using it
because the GSM/WLAN combo is just the killer app on it. It sucks a bit
more than my regular mobile phone (which I sometimes carry instead, I
have a Dual-SIM contract), but for me all mobiles suck. I have thin
fingers, but using mobile keypads always makes me feel like having jelly
sticks on my hands. That is why I love the BudgeTone 100 phone :-P

Best regards,

Anselm

P.S.: Your fingers are too fat to dial - please mash the keys for your
free dialing wand  -- phone announcement in Simpsons King Size Homer


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Can Asterisk act like an ISP dialin server to data callls from Sipura 3000 or other ATA connected devices ?

2007-11-27 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 18:00 +0100 schrieb Robert Rozman:
 Hi,
 
 I have an older phone with touch screen from Philips. It have it connected
  to Sipura 3000 FXS port and majority of features work ok.
 
 But phone also has touchscreen and web browser that I'd love to use for
  accessing my local web pages. But the phone only allows me to setup ISP
  phone number (username and password) and it wants to call it to get to 
 Internet. Since it is
 connected to Sipura3000, call can come to Asterisk and I'd love to somehow
 fool that device and connect it to local web pages ?
 
 I guess I could somehow mimic ISP internet calling feature on local 
 Asterisk server, but have no
 clue even where to start searching ...
 
  Any advice ?

Hi Robert,

I researched for something similar about a year ago, and came up with
nothing really worth the work. If you can, try to get another ATA that
has a real, old-fashioned serial modem plugged into it, and limit that
modem to 9600. I think more than that will not work reliably, but you
could of course try.

The only working implementation of software emulating a modem in
conjunction with asterisk I have seen is fax-related, and even there I
read from several people that anything better than 9600 is hardly ever
achieved. The code there is cranked into fax-use though, not modem use,
which would require the PPP bytestream to be off-handed instead of fax
parsing. Perhaps iaxmodem would do that No idea.

I'd be interested in how you get that working, if you do indeed.

BR
Anselm


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP port 5060 closed - how do I open it?

2007-11-27 Thread Nick Brown
Zaheer,

On 28/11/07 9:28 AM, Zaheer K. Master [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes I have a sip.conf, contents as follows:

From the CLI can you confirm SIP is running by pasting the results of
'module show like sip'

Cheers
Nick.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi!

2. if the call is not answered after a short time, a light (phone 
   layout is similiar to the Snom phones) begins to blink at the 
   monitor phones; caller ID and the target number are displayed; if 
   you press the button next to the blinking light, you pick-up the 
   call;

I don't think you will be able to get the exact same behaviour arranged 
with asterisk and snom, however there are three choices for you that get 
quite close:

1. Use group dial like in Dial(SIP/1SIP/2) and have your monitor phones 
each act as SIP/2 to SIP/6 with dedicated (!) lines that have their 
ringer set to silent. You might want to adjust the Caller ID name to 
prefix it with the called number like to 123: from 4567890. The SNOMs 
have 12 lines, so why not actually use some of them ...
A variation of this: Record a new ringer sound that is a) long and b) has 
10+ seconds silence at the beginning, and let the monitoring SNOMs use 
that.

2. Take a closer look at the new SLA functionality in Asterisk 1.4 
(shared line appearance), the Wiki has it all including a link to the 
blog that explains it all in detail

3. Stay with your current solution, and add a SIP MESSAGE sent using 
sipsak using System() that informs the monitoring phones of the caller 
ID; I haven't tested this particular case so I am not sure if this SIP 
MESSAGE would not be immediately overwritten on the phone's display with 
other data like (useless) pick-up information.

Cheers, Philipp


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Lost setting up IAXmodem after drive crash

2007-11-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz
oops.

I meant to post this to the Hylafax list  :-[

And with a reboot, at least it made the call.  Now to get the fax to print!

Robert Moskowitz wrote:
 A few weeks ago, I lost my Trixbox that was all set up with Hylafax and 
 IAXmodem.

 I am trying to set it up for

 email  procmail  faxmail  iaxmodem  asterisk sipext  ATA (with 
 attached fax).

 I have followed all the instructions on creating the IAX extension and 
 configuring the IAXmodem config file.  I can see the connection in Asterisk:

 iax2 show peers
 Name/UsernameHost Mask Port  
 Status   
 24729127.0.0.1   (D)  255.255.255.255  32770 
 Unmonitored
 1 iax2 peers [0 online, 0 offline, 1 unmonitored]


 at this point I am SUPPOSE to be able to test with sendfax:

 sendfax -d 2201 /etc/hylafax/hyla.conf

 and nothing happens that I can tell.  I see some files in spool/hylafax:

 ls docq/ -lstr
 total 24
  4 -rw---  1 uucp 60002 1 Nov 27 15:04 seqf
  8 -rw-r-  1 uucp 60002  6636 Nov 27 15:04 doc1.ps
 12 -rw-r-  1 uucp 60002 11264 Nov 27 15:04 cover1

 Then I found in tmp:

 cat tmp/ttyIAX0_last_wedged_email
 1196204456

 This is a temp file written and read by bin/wedged to rate-limit
 the emails it sends about the wedged status of device /dev/ttyIAX0.

 The first line contains a timestamp for when the last email was sent.

 This file is never deleted automatically, there's no need to do it
 and it may be useful to know when/if a device had last a problem.
 However, you can safely delete it at any time if you wish, it will
 be recreated when needed.

 last modified: Tue Nov 27 18:00:56 EST 2007


 What have I left out?



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Philip Prindeville
If the hunt-group is properly done, you should be able to busy-out 
members of a trunk for maintenance.

Otherwise, if the individual trunks have numbers (unpublished) assigned 
to all the circuits in the group, you could always send a Redirect() to 
that any of the other trunks' numbers.

-Philip

Alex Balashov wrote:
 Our provider gives us four PRIs as a trunk group hunt group.  Meaning, the 
 provider's switch will cycle through B channels in span 1, 2, 3, ... until 
 it finds one that is available.

 I have moved spans 2-4 onto another machine.  But we have one remaining
 box with a PRI full of calls and I don't know what to do with them; the
 box is failing, but dropping them by simply yanking the PRI is not
 acceptable from a business POV.

 Sending Congestion() or Busy() in the dial plan wouldn't work because
 the far-end switch would simply pass that onto the subscriber, rather
 interpreting it to mean that the B channel is unavailable and it should
 go on to other T1s in the trunk group.

 Any ideas?


 --
 Alex Balashov
 Evariste Systems
 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
 Tel: +1-678-954-0670
 Direct : +1-678-954-0671

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Urgent question.

2007-11-27 Thread Philip Prindeville
Anyone have an application to robo-dial an outgoing conference call?  ;-)

You could tie up all your circuits with outbound calls...

If you hairpin them at the switch, you shouldn't incur any usage costs...


Steve Totaro wrote:
 To answer the question, there is currently no way to busy out a channel 
 except to put it in use.  There was some discussion about adding this 
 feature at Astricon and on the list fairly recently.

 Thanks,
 Steve
   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Snom phones, blinking lights and call pickup

2007-11-27 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Philipp von Klitzing wrote:

2. if the call is not answered after a short time, a light (phone 
   layout is similiar to the Snom phones) begins to blink at the 
   monitor phones; caller ID and the target number are displayed; if 
   you press the button next to the blinking light, you pick-up the 
   call;
 
 I don't think you will be able to get the exact same behaviour arranged 
 with asterisk and snom, however there are three choices for you that get 
 quite close:
 
 1. Use group dial like in Dial(SIP/1SIP/2) and have your monitor phones 
 each act as SIP/2 to SIP/6 with dedicated (!) lines that have their 
 ringer set to silent. You might want to adjust the Caller ID name to 
 prefix it with the called number like to 123: from 4567890. The SNOMs 
 have 12 lines, so why not actually use some of them ...

I wouldn't like that personally but it's an interesting
idea anyway.

 A variation of this: Record a new ringer sound that is a) long and b) has 
 10+ seconds silence at the beginning, and let the monitoring SNOMs use 
 that.

Might work if the sound file is on the phone before you
try to dial to it. If you use the Alert-Info header in
combination with ringtones longer than just a few seconds
the Snom crashes.

Better use the ring_after_delay setting if you plan to go
this way.
http://wiki.snom.com/Web_Interface/Settings/Common#ring_after_delay

 3. Stay with your current solution, and add a SIP MESSAGE sent using 
 sipsak using System() that informs the monitoring phones of the caller 
 ID; I haven't tested this particular case so I am not sure if this SIP 
 MESSAGE would not be immediately overwritten on the phone's display with 
 other data like (useless) pick-up information.

Might work but it smells like an ugly hack. Remember you
need to clear the desktop messages.


Grüße,
  Philipp Kempgen

-- 
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
  Asterisk? - http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de

Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >