Re: [asterisk-users] Installing sounds

[Motiejus Jakštys]

If the version either 1.4.x or 1.6.x, run "make menuconfig" from
asterisk source directory, pick up sounds you need, and make install
then.

Or, you can do as mentioned above: install sounds you need explicitly.

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:42 AM, ayodele abejide
 wrote:
> hi,
>
> I did not install sounds during the installation of Asterisk, was wondering
> if there is any means through which I can get to install sounds without
> having to do a complete re-install of asterisk
>
> 
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
> --
> _
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] [Asterisk-User] Asterisk Video support

[DHAVAL INDRODIYA]

Hi All,

I am new to asterisk-video,

is it possible to install video apps in 1.6.2.6 and play live video calls on
weburl?

please help me i dont have much idea for asterisk-video even dont know about
installation.

any help appreciated

regards
Dhaval
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Installing sounds

[Andres]

On 5/23/2010 9:42 PM, ayodele abejide wrote:
> hi,
>
> I did not install sounds during the installation of Asterisk, was 
> wondering if there is any means through which I can get to install 
> sounds without having to do a complete re-install of asterisk
>
Sure, just download them from here:
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/sounds/

Andres
http://www.neuroredes.com
> 
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. 
> 


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Installing sounds

[ayodele abejide]

hi,

I did not install sounds during the installation of Asterisk, was wondering if 
there is any means through which I can get to install sounds without having to 
do a complete re-install of asterisk
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Dahdi problems with kernel 2.6.32

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:40:25AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:

> How would the device be created, I certainly did not do it myself -- I
> thought modprobing the modules would do such a thing.  I will certainly
> try lsdahdi when I can reboot into the new kernel.

The device is created is the file exists. lsdahdi, however, uses
information from /proc/dahdi . Technically slightly different.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Dahdi problems with kernel 2.6.32

[covici]

Tzafrir Cohen  wrote:

> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:54:38AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Hi.  I am having problems with dahdi using kernel 2.6.32.  I am using
> > 2.6.30 kernel and it works fine -- here is the output of dahdi_cfg -vv
> > ++ dahdi_cfg -vv
> > DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r8670
> > 
> > DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r7445M
> > Echo Canceller(s):
> > Configuration
> > ==
> > 
> > 
> > Channel map:
> > 
> > Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
> > Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)
> > 
> > 2 channels to configure.
> > 
> > Changing signalling on channel 1 from Unused to FXO Kewlstart
> > Setting echocan for channel 1 to mg2
> > Changing signalling on channel 4 from Unused to FXS Kewlstart
> > Setting echocan for channel 4 to mg2
> > 
> > However, if I am using kernel 2.6.32 I get the following -- the configs
> > have not changed:
> > 
> > ++ dahdi_cfg -vv
> > DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r7409
> > DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)
> 
> Any chance that with that version the device was not created? What do
> you see on the output of lsdahdi in both cases?
> 
> > 
> > DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r8653M
> > Echo Canceller(s):
> > Configuration
> > ==
> > 
> > 
> > Channel map:
> > 
> > Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
> > Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)
> > 
> > 2 channels to configure.
> >  
> > 
> > I had to update dahdi-trunk because  the old version would not compile
> > under 2.6.32, and update of dahdi-tools-trunk make no difference.
> 
> If you want a more "stable" version that still builds with newer
> kernels, look at the 2.2 or 2.3 svn branches (and released tarballs).
How would the device be created, I certainly did not do it myself -- I
thought modprobing the modules would do such a thing.  I will certainly
try lsdahdi when I can reboot into the new kernel.



-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici
 cov...@ccs.covici.com

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] US "Truth in caller id act"... and it's impact onservices

[j...@j4computers.com]

I submit this is still very ambiguous.  The "intent to . . . deceive" is, like 
"beauty" all in the eye of the beholder, or, (or accuser) one must be able to 
accurately read the mind of the "perpetrator".

Also, what is "inaccurate"?  Is that when you transmit the original ID, as is 
default?  Is that "accurate"?  Or is it "accurate" to say it came from the 
"hairpin" machine?

A field day for lawyers.   As are so many laws.  Wiggle room.

joe a.

i>>> On 5/22/2010 at 3:28 PM, Philip Prindeville
 wrote:
> For the 3rd consecutive term, the US Senate has introduced the "Truth in 
> caller ID Act of 2009".
> 
> It was passed by the Senate (finally) in January, and has moved to the 
> House for a vote.
> 
> A lot of states have ambiguous or overly restrictive language on how 
> caller ID may be manipulated.
> 
> For instance, if you have a PBX, and a call comes in from the PSTN, 
> which you then loop back out or "hairpin" (without a redirect) to the 
> PSTN (therefore as two separate but bridged call legs) and put the 
> caller ID of the 1st call onto the 2nd leg (which is, by the way, the 
> default behavior of Asterisk) you may be breaking the law in some states.
> 
> This law introduces uniformity across all states (it's nice to have a 
> level playing field, whether you agree with this law or not).
> 
> It also very specifically defines under what condition spoofing/swatting 
> is illegal:
> 
> (1)IN  GENERAL- It shall be unlawful for any person within the United 
> States,in  connection with any real time voice communications service, 
> regardless of the technology or network utilized, to cause anycaller  ID  
> service to transmit misleading or inaccuratecaller  ID  information, with the 
> intent to defraud or deceive.
> 
> http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc111/h1258_eh.xml 
> 
> 
> which is nice, because it's less ambiguous about when the activity is 
> illegal (and avoids unnecessary contention between customers, telcos, and 
> PUC's).
> 
> 
> For instance, if you're implementing "single number calling" for your 
> employees, so that their cell-originated calls indicates their primary 
> (deskphone) work number, the "the intent to defraud or deceive" is absent.
> 
> This act delivers a badly needed brightline definition of what can and 
> can't be done within the limits of the law.
> 
> If you agree with this law, and believe that it facilitates the 
> deployment of useful calling features, then please contact your congressman.
> 
> And if you don't, well, you have a voice too, so tell them why it falls 
> short.
> 
> Either way, this act has been backburnered way too long and it's time to 
> have a final conclusion on the matter.
> 
> -Philip
> 
> 





-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Dahdi problems with kernel 2.6.32

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:54:38AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi.  I am having problems with dahdi using kernel 2.6.32.  I am using
> 2.6.30 kernel and it works fine -- here is the output of dahdi_cfg -vv
> ++ dahdi_cfg -vv
> DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r8670
> 
> DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r7445M
> Echo Canceller(s):
> Configuration
> ==
> 
> 
> Channel map:
> 
> Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
> Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)
> 
> 2 channels to configure.
> 
> Changing signalling on channel 1 from Unused to FXO Kewlstart
> Setting echocan for channel 1 to mg2
> Changing signalling on channel 4 from Unused to FXS Kewlstart
> Setting echocan for channel 4 to mg2
> 
> However, if I am using kernel 2.6.32 I get the following -- the configs
> have not changed:
> 
> ++ dahdi_cfg -vv
> DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r7409
> DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)

Any chance that with that version the device was not created? What do
you see on the output of lsdahdi in both cases?

> 
> DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r8653M
> Echo Canceller(s):
> Configuration
> ==
> 
> 
> Channel map:
> 
> Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
> Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)
> 
> 2 channels to configure.
>  
> 
> I had to update dahdi-trunk because  the old version would not compile
> under 2.6.32, and update of dahdi-tools-trunk make no difference.

If you want a more "stable" version that still builds with newer
kernels, look at the 2.2 or 2.3 svn branches (and released tarballs).

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Dahdi problems with kernel 2.6.32

[covici]

Hi.  I am having problems with dahdi using kernel 2.6.32.  I am using
2.6.30 kernel and it works fine -- here is the output of dahdi_cfg -vv
++ dahdi_cfg -vv
DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r8670

DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r7445M
Echo Canceller(s):
Configuration
==


Channel map:

Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)

2 channels to configure.

Changing signalling on channel 1 from Unused to FXO Kewlstart
Setting echocan for channel 1 to mg2
Changing signalling on channel 4 from Unused to FXS Kewlstart
Setting echocan for channel 4 to mg2

However, if I am using kernel 2.6.32 I get the following -- the configs
have not changed:

++ dahdi_cfg -vv
DAHDI Tools Version - SVN-trunk-r7409
DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)

DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r8653M
Echo Canceller(s):
Configuration
==


Channel map:

Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)

2 channels to configure.
 

I had to update dahdi-trunk because  the old version would not compile
under 2.6.32, and update of dahdi-tools-trunk make no difference.

Any ideas would be appreciated.

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici
 cov...@ccs.covici.com

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users