[asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
Hi all, I need to build an application that will be an SIP server program that will run on Linux and Windows. The sip server need only some features such as be able to : - Register sip endpoints - Answer a call and play a local file - Make a dial from one channel to another. I know asterisk can be stripped to exactly fit my needs. I would like to know if there is a way to build it on windows after it has been stripped. Or do I have other alternatives out there ? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Unmute all users in Meetme conference as admin
Hi, I setup an MeetMe conference. So, the admin user calls and enter the conference in talk/listen mode. (Options : dAaxs) Then other users call the same conference and enters in muted mode (options: dlmx) How can the admin user decide, when he is ready to let everybody speaks ? I didn't find such option in the admin menu. Thanks -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] what is the possible cause of maximum pbx stack exceeded
Hi. I am using asterisk 11 svn r401076M and I am getting this warning at times. I can't find much doing a google search, so anyone with any ideas? I have looked at the logs, but can find no particular pattern to indicate where this is happening and the system appears to be otherwise working, but I am still wondering if something is wrong. I am also using freepbx in case there are known issues there -- because some of these occur during their dialout trunk code. Any suggestions would be appreciated. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Unmute all users in Meetme conference as admin
I think I found it reading the code. It is *83 to unmute everybody. Thanks From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ruddy Gbaguidi Sent: 2013-12-04 04:07 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Unmute all users in Meetme conference as admin Hi, I setup an MeetMe conference. So, the admin user calls and enter the conference in talk/listen mode. (Options : dAaxs) Then other users call the same conference and enters in muted mode (options: dlmx) How can the admin user decide, when he is ready to let everybody speaks ? I didn't find such option in the admin menu. Thanks -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
It all depends on what you are trying to do. In terms of reliability and maintainability I would not try to use a windows desktop machine. There are a couple of alternatives. Could you describe the desired functionality? jg -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
On Wednesday 04 December 2013, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote: Hi all, I need to build an application that will be an SIP server program that will run on Linux and Windows. The sip server need only some features such as be able to : - Register sip endpoints - Answer a call and play a local file - Make a dial from one channel to another. I know asterisk can be stripped to exactly fit my needs. I would like to know if there is a way to build it on windows after it has been stripped. Or do I have other alternatives out there ? Installing Asterisk natively on Windows is a bit like training a gerbil to bark, in terms of effort and reward. The easiest way to get Asterisk to run on a machine that normally would run Windows, is from a live USB distribution. -- AJS Answers come *after* questions. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
On Wednesday 04 December 2013, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote: Hi all, I need to build an application that will be an SIP server program that will run on Linux and Windows. The sip server need only some features such as be able to : - Register sip endpoints - Answer a call and play a local file - Make a dial from one channel to another. I know asterisk can be stripped to exactly fit my needs. I would like to know if there is a way to build it on windows after it has been stripped. Or do I have other alternatives out there ? Ruddy If you can use windows 8.1 Pro 64bit. You can use hyper-v and run a virtual linux machine (Or the Free Hyper-V Server 2012 R2), VM Ware also works well. Load asterisk on that and you are set. This is how we run it at a few very small customers as well as my development machines and it works great. Best linux builds for Hyper-V we currently have found to be Ubuntu and Suse. As both a windows and linux guy I have to concur that loading Asterisk on windows directly is like putting a V8 on a moped. You may get there, but it won't be pretty; It's a lot of work, and it would be hell to maintain. (We do not trust it for production applications) In all seriousness I have a Asterisk build running on windows and it is stable but it is a lot of work to get it there and since it is not maintained by the community it is a full task to keep it up to date. We use it for in process testing of code that we develop with MS visual studio. If not for that I would not bother with Asterisk on Windows there would be no value in it. Especially since the current version of Asterisk now works so well in virtual environments. Good luck Bryant -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ruddy Gbaguidi Sent: 04 December 2013 09:08 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows Hi all, I need to build an application that will be an SIP server program that will run on Linux and Windows. The sip server need only some features such as be able to : - Register sip endpoints - Answer a call and play a local file - Make a dial from one channel to another. I know asterisk can be stripped to exactly fit my needs. I would like to know if there is a way to build it on windows after it has been stripped. Or do I have other alternatives out there ? Servers that can run Asterisk are so cheap nowadays, unless you are talking about huge volumes of traffic. I'd recommend getting a server and putting on Centos which is tried and tested. You'll waste less time that way and avoid any unforeseen problems. Or look for a cloud server to do the job for you. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
This is about an call center application we are building and that need an embedded PBX. We would then like to have that platform run on Windows and Linux. Are there ways to easy ship linux application embedded in virtual machine so they can run on windows ? Le 2013-12-04 08:02, Dan Journo a écrit : FROM: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] ON BEHALF OF Ruddy Gbaguidi SENT: 04 December 2013 09:08 TO: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' SUBJECT: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows Hi all, I need to build an application that will be an SIP server program that will run on Linux and Windows. The sip server need only some features such as be able to : - Register sip endpoints - Answer a call and play a local file - Make a dial from one channel to another. I know asterisk can be stripped to exactly fit my needs. I would like to know if there is a way to build it on windows after it has been stripped. Or do I have other alternatives out there ? Servers that can run Asterisk are so cheap nowadays, unless you are talking about huge volumes of traffic. I'd recommend getting a server and putting on Centos which is tried and tested. You'll waste less time that way and avoid any unforeseen problems. Or look for a cloud server to do the job for you. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
Ruddy If you can target windows 8.0 pro or 8.1 pro you can ship a Hyper-V image. (This same image would work with Hyper-V on, Hyper-V Server 2012/2012r2 and Windows Server 2012/2012r2. You would need to write some kind of configuration editor or documentation to customize the image to the users network environment. You could automate the entire process if you were so inclined. You can fully automate the Hyper-V side of things using PowerShell or Dot.Net The Linux side of things can be automated in a number of ways. We personally wrote a windows program that collects information from the user and posts it to our databases. The default image then has a script that pulls the info down (images uses DHCP to start) and re-writes the asterisk configs. This process is not a small task but if you have the time and budge it can work very well. Thanks Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.) 616-855-1030 Ext. 2003 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI-Linux and DAHDI-Tools 2.8.0-rc5 Now Available
Thanks for all of the hard work everyone put into this release. I think sometimes we take some of these open-source projects for granted and don't appreciate all the hours that people put into them. Is there a general timeframe for when you think a stable 2.8.0 release will be available? Thanks; John V -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk Development Team Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 3:50 PM To: asterisk-annou...@lists.digium.com; asterisk-...@lists.digium.com; asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] DAHDI-Linux and DAHDI-Tools 2.8.0-rc5 Now Available The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of: DAHDI-Linux-v2.8.0-rc5 DAHDI-Tools-v2.8.0-rc5 dahdi-linux-complete-2.8.0-rc5+2.8.0-rc5 This release is available for immediate download at: http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-tools http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux-complete *** THIS RC FIXES CENTOS 6.5 PDE_DATA build issue *** In version 2.8 we have introduced two new drivers: wcte43x - For Digium's new line of 2/4 span T1/E1 cards wcaxx - For Digium's new line of analog fxs/fxo cards We introduced a common library called wcxb which ties the previous two drivers, plus the recently introduced wcte13xp driver, together into one common base. dahdi-linux-complete tarballs now include all firmware necessary to build without an internet connection. Issues closed in this release: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/DAHLIN-331 Shortlog of changes since v2.7.0.1: Oron Peled (16): xpp: Serialize dahdi registration xpp: refactor FXS ring settings xpp: FXS: ring/mwi settings: a sysfs interface xpp: ring/mwi settings: add to FXS init script add a 'location' attribute to sysfs (dahdi_device): dahdi: add tools_rootdir module parameter Also send DAHDI_TOOLS_ROOTDIR with device events live_dahdi: load dahdi with tools_rootdir=$DESTDIR remove udev rules: moved to dahdi-tools sysfs: create symlink ddev to device of span dahdi: Rename span 'master' as 'master_span' .gitignore: *.ko.unsigned Rename pinned spans to assigned spans xpp: automatic dahdi_registration by default sysfs: new driver attribute: master_span Makefile: new 'make-dist' target Russ Meyerriecks (3): wcte13xp: Migrate to wcxb library wcte13xp: Hold framer in reset to stop xmit on modprobe -r wcte13xp: Improve maintenance functions and error counters Shaun Ruffell (28): dahdi_config: Remove unused NO_DCDC definition. dahdi: Clear DAHDI_ALARM_NOTOPEN when spans are re-initialized. dahdi: Fix placement of '/' in output of /proc/dahdi/x dahdi: Work around missing KBUILD_MODNAME dahdi: Backport try_wait_for_completion() and list_first_entry() wct4xxp: Print warning in dmesg if span priority is not set correctly. wct4xxp: Fix bipolar error insertion test mode. wct4xxp: VPM companding switch print is now debug only. wct4xxp: If linemode changed via sysfs, reset the complete part. wct4xxp, wcte13xp: Move the octasic DSP code into separate module. wcaxx: New driver for A4A/A4B/A8A/A8B analog cards. wcaxx: Update A4B firmware to version 0b0017 wcxb: Update the firmware meta block during flash update. wcte43x: Do not grab reglock in handle_transmit/handle_receive. wcte43x: Remove 'dcxo' debug attribute. oct612x: Make dependent on dahdi.ko dahdi_dynamic: Create a span type for dynamic spans. wcaxx: Use startup/shutdown callbacks to protect access to channel registers. wctdm24xxp: Remove assigned callback. dahdi: Remove ddev symlink before unregistering the span device. dahdi: CentOS 6.5 backported PDE_DATA definition. wcxb: is_pcie - pci_is_pcie() wcxb: Do not access cur_transfer/cur_msg outside of lock. wcaxx: Add extra dummy read when checking for single fxs modules. wcte43x: Update firmware to version e0017. dahdi: Replace drv_attr with drv_groups on kernels 3.12. Revert wcaxx: Use startup/shutdown callbacks to protect access to channel registers. dahdi: Fix previous CentOS 6.5 commit. Shaun RuffellL (1): wcaxx: Remove some left over debugging trace statements. Tzafrir Cohen (6): xpp: Firmware for Astribanks 2.02 xpp: Firmware for Astribanks 2.02: Makefile xpp: USB_FW.202.hex: provide as a symlink xpp: mark an AB as failed if it gives bad desc xpp: Fail loading if no module on first slot Ignore some more firmware files Wendell Thompson (2): wcte13xp: Use interrupts for Falc alarms
[asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI-Linux and DAHDI-Tools 2.7.0.2 Now Available
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:18:54PM -0800, Ira wrote: Hello Shaun, Tuesday, December 3, 2013, 7:20:34 PM, you wrote: Based on some direct replies that you sent, my current belief is that you are not recompiling dahdi_echocan_hpec for the new versions of DAHDI. Yes, it was me. I've had to copy the HPEC stuff from version to version so many time and it's been hectic and I forgot all about it. Solved the problem in both the current and beta versions. Thanks so much for the help. And thank you for trying out the release candidates and reporting issues. We really do appreciate it. Cheers, Shaun -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
That's just disgusting If you want to run your phones on WindBlows use lync Should be plenty point and click easy for you On 12/04/2013 09:19 AM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
As per that theory 3CX should have been public by now !! Mitul On Dec 4, 2013 8:49 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Unmute all users in Meetme conference as admin
Have you thought of using the app_konference module? You can find it here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/appkonference. You can configure many of the options with the dialplan switches, there's a simple but functional web page to monitor all of the conferences and attendees (mute, unmute, kick, etc), and a PERL script that's used to control everything such as logins/logouts/process DTMF, etc. Plus, it doesn't require a timing source. I really like the ability to modify the PERL script to do what I want. I pretty much rewrote the whole PERL script for a custom application for a customer. Right now he routinely handles 100 attendee conferences on some low-end piece of crap PC without issue, although more memory would be helpful. We're getting ready to test a bigger server that will accommodate 500 users. Something to consider. Regards; John V From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ruddy Gbaguidi Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 4:07 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Unmute all users in Meetme conference as admin Hi, I setup an MeetMe conference. So, the admin user calls and enter the conference in talk/listen mode. (Options : dAaxs) Then other users call the same conference and enters in muted mode (options: dlmx) How can the admin user decide, when he is ready to let everybody speaks ? I didn't find such option in the admin menu. Thanks -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
On 12/04/2013 10:22 AM, Gregory Malsack wrote: Its beyond disgusting. If it was not for legacy garbage nothing from m$ would be left in my datacenter. Saying you are an expert Linux user is just a joke when you don't understand the poor architectural choices that come with windows and why it can never be a real robust operating system. That's just disgusting If you want to run your phones on WindBlows use lync Should be plenty point and click easy for you On 12/04/2013 09:19 AM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Asterisk is Open Source, any company can port Asterisk to Windows.Nobody has. Personally, I don't want Digium taking valuable and limited development resources to create a Windows port. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of CDR Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
I second that! Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Eric Wieling ewiel...@nyigc.com wrote: Asterisk is Open Source, any company can port Asterisk to Windows.Nobody has. Personally, I don't want Digium taking valuable and limited development resources to create a Windows port. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of CDR Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
On 13-12-04 10:19 AM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. Do you just sit around and think shit up to blame Digium all day? -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
I just checked my calendar, and - surprisingly - it's not April 1st! On 4 Dec 2013 23:55, Gregory Malsack gmals...@coastalacq.com wrote: I second that! *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID* Eric Wieling ewiel...@nyigc.com wrote: Asterisk is Open Source, any company can port Asterisk to Windows. Nobody has. Personally, I don't want Digium taking valuable and limited development resources to create a Windows port. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of CDR Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
Use freeswitch instead, it does run on Windows. Ruddy Gbaguidi plugwo...@micnes.com wrote: This is about an call center application we are building and that need an embedded PBX. We would then like to have that platform run on Windows and Linux. Are there ways to easy ship linux application embedded in virtual machine so they can run on windows ? Le 2013-12-04 08:02, Dan Journo a écrit : FROM: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] ON BEHALF OF Ruddy Gbaguidi SENT: 04 December 2013 09:08 TO: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' SUBJECT: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows Hi all, I need to build an application that will be an SIP server program that will run on Linux and Windows. The sip server need only some features such as be able to : - Register sip endpoints - Answer a call and play a local file - Make a dial from one channel to another. I know asterisk can be stripped to exactly fit my needs. I would like to know if there is a way to build it on windows after it has been stripped. Or do I have other alternatives out there ? Servers that can run Asterisk are so cheap nowadays, unless you are talking about huge volumes of traffic. I'd recommend getting a server and putting on Centos which is tried and tested. You'll waste less time that way and avoid any unforeseen problems. Or look for a cloud server to do the job for you. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
On Wednesday 04 December 2013, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Why would they? They already have it working well enough under Linux. Linux has a very steep learning curve. Only if your brain has been damaged by Windows. People who have never used Windows before tend to get on fairly well with Linux when using it for the first time. And Asterisk has a *way* steeper learning curve than Linux. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. Yes, it does. I've been using Linux since it was a curiosity on a single floppy disk, and I still have plenty to learn. But at least nobody is actively trying to conceal it from me. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. Depends what you mean by friendliness. Human-readable configuration files that I can edit with vi if I have to are friendlier than a drag-and-drool interface, by some measurements. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. Asterisk is Free software under the GPL. Anyone is welcome to package it for whatever platform they like. Nobody has bothered to do it because it's actually more effort to persuade Asterisk work on Windows' broken architecture, than it is to learn to use a Unix-like system. TL;DR: It's not our fault if you believe Microsoft's story that you're too stupid to use a real computer. It's certainly not our fault if you have let it come true. -- AJS Answers come *after* questions. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
On 12/04/2013 11:00 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: On 13-12-04 10:19 AM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. Do you just sit around and think shit up to blame Digium all day? Normally I do not respond to trolls but... If you want an Asterisk version to run on Windows, go for it. You are free to create it yourself. Most of the folks on this list realize the Asterisk on Windows is a huge mistake. If you really believe that this is such a good idea, go for it and become a bazillionare from your work. Then you can come back and say I told you so. Until then take the advise of the many good folks on this list that collectively have many decades of experience and run asterisk on Linux. Regards, JohnM -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
I know who is lost here :) for sure not digium ... -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows
Telephony, especially VoIP telephony, is hard. A PBX will be complicated and difficult to understand and manage regardless of which operating system the PBX runs on. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of cov...@ccs.covici.com Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:06 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk SIP server on windows Use freeswitch instead, it does run on Windows. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Probably feeding the trolls but here it goes. On 12/04/2013 04:19 PM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. IIRC Microsoft no longer invests in the .Net framework which makes it a bad idea for a product that would live for up to 10 years. Do you really want to bet your business/company that .Net will be there in 5 to 10 years? Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. I find Linux easier than Windows. Installing a package on Linux or Windows is not the issue. How is a simple 'yum install asterisk' any more difficult than double clicking on it in Windows? It's what you do afterwards with the OS and package. Asterisk has a much steeper learning curve than either. It's easy to mess up the config and suffer the consequences if the box is Internet facing. Also, Windows has a terrible reputation when it comes to security. Why would anyone want to use Windows for an Internet facing service? There's a reason that Google, Facebook, Twitter and pretty much the rest of the world are powered by Linux and it's not only because it's cheaper. Just because you find Windows easier does not make it a good idea. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. There is probably a saying about people calling themselves experts and then complain about a move from EL6 to F20 which is puzzling by itself. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I have yet to see a large Telco or ITSP deploy their services on Windows. A while back I have seen some attempts. It was hilarious to hear that the servers had to be restarted every few hours. Performance totally sucked, components would crash and the solution was, even by telco standards, ridiculously expensive. So no, they are not on equal footing when it comes to performance (and other aspects). I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. If you really want to use Windows then have a look at FreeSWITCH as it's available on Windows too. Then there is also Lync and 3CX. Good luck keeping your Windows boxes from getting hacked with all the financial and other damage it would cause. Regards, Patrick -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk and sites connected via IP-VPN
Just wanted to get a feel for people in the community. I researched a lot of information but I wanted to know the communities perspective on this and didnt want to revive a dead thread: Any pros/cons for connection to asterisk boxes located at different sites via an IP-VPN or Frame Relay? I wanted to know the best cost effective way to connect the two remote boxes other than the Internet. Thanks in advanced! -E -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Jetway, Atom, and Digium cards - play well together?
Hi, I'd like to know from other people's experience using Asterisk and Digium cards like the TDM410P and B410P on Atom system (.e. giwth D525 CPU) and Jetway motherboards. Any operational instability, unexpected freezes, etc or in your experience it's a stable combination? Thanks in advance for any sharing! Rgds. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and sites connected via IP-VPN
Have seen mostly a lot of hq/branch implementations using IPSEC over standard Internet connections.. that's what seems most cost effective for most smb's, imo, with the inherent trade-offs. Other than that, I'd say private IP VPN's based on HDSL E1's. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, er ic email.eherr9...@gmail.com wrote: Just wanted to get a feel for people in the community. I researched a lot of information but I wanted to know the communities perspective on this and didnt want to revive a dead thread: Any pros/cons for connection to asterisk boxes located at different sites via an IP-VPN or Frame Relay? I wanted to know the best cost effective way to connect the two remote boxes other than the Internet. Thanks in advanced! -E -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and sites connected via IP-VPN
IPSec VPN is what we use. The biggest issue is QoS. I do not see any other inexpensive solution. -Vladimir On 12/4/2013 12:10 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote: Have seen mostly a lot of hq/branch implementations using IPSEC over standard Internet connections.. that's what seems most cost effective for most smb's, imo, with the inherent trade-offs. Other than that, I'd say private IP VPN's based on HDSL E1's. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, er ic email.eherr9...@gmail.com mailto:email.eherr9...@gmail.com wrote: Just wanted to get a feel for people in the community. I researched a lot of information but I wanted to know the communities perspective on this and didnt want to revive a dead thread: Any pros/cons for connection to asterisk boxes located at different sites via an IP-VPN or Frame Relay? I wanted to know the best cost effective way to connect the two remote boxes other than the Internet. Thanks in advanced! -E -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and sites connected via IP-VPN
I wanted to know the best cost effective way to connect the two remote boxes other than the Internet. Depends on your cost per minute on the PSTN. We used to use the Internet for inter-office communications, until our pipes started to get really congested (Client hosting) that forced us to use the PSTN for quality purposes. The smaller sites are still using OpenVPN/VOIP to each other and PSTN back to our Corporate offices with really good results. For us, prices are still cheaper then when we were point to point (T1) Doug -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight. We have been using asterisk on linux from a long time now and happy with it. But some of our customers who has windows in their environment want to use our call center software we developed on top of asterisk. So, the question was : Did anybody ever tried to isolate the asterisk SIP server/module and make it run under Windows ? Since, asterisk 12 is using pjsip (which is cross platform already), I tought it may be possible and wanted advices. I would love that every single customer switch to Linux and Ubuntu tomorrow morning but at the moment, that's not the case. Thanks. Le 2013-12-04 11:31, Patrick Lists a écrit : Probably feeding the trolls but here it goes. On 12/04/2013 04:19 PM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. IIRC Microsoft no longer invests in the .Net framework which makes it a bad idea for a product that would live for up to 10 years. Do you really want to bet your business/company that .Net will be there in 5 to 10 years? Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. I find Linux easier than Windows. Installing a package on Linux or Windows is not the issue. How is a simple 'yum install asterisk' any more difficult than double clicking on it in Windows? It's what you do afterwards with the OS and package. Asterisk has a much steeper learning curve than either. It's easy to mess up the config and suffer the consequences if the box is Internet facing. Also, Windows has a terrible reputation when it comes to security. Why would anyone want to use Windows for an Internet facing service? There's a reason that Google, Facebook, Twitter and pretty much the rest of the world are powered by Linux and it's not only because it's cheaper. Just because you find Windows easier does not make it a good idea. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. There is probably a saying about people calling themselves experts and then complain about a move from EL6 to F20 which is puzzling by itself. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I have yet to see a large Telco or ITSP deploy their services on Windows. A while back I have seen some attempts. It was hilarious to hear that the servers had to be restarted every few hours. Performance totally sucked, components would crash and the solution was, even by telco standards, ridiculously expensive. So no, they are not on equal footing when it comes to performance (and other aspects). I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. If you really want to use Windows then have a look at FreeSWITCH as it's available on Windows too. Then there is also Lync and 3CX. Good luck keeping your Windows boxes from getting hacked with all the financial and other damage it would cause. Regards, Patrick -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on Windows
Use FreeSWITCH !! Thats what you want on your winblows system, so suit yourself my friend. Mitul On Dec 5, 2013 12:43 AM, Ruddy Gbaguidi plugwo...@micnes.com wrote: I never tought this is become a Linux vs Windows fight. We have been using asterisk on linux from a long time now and happy with it. But some of our customers who has windows in their environment want to use our call center software we developed on top of asterisk. So, the question was : Did anybody ever tried to isolate the asterisk SIP server/module and make it run under Windows ? Since, asterisk 12 is using pjsip (which is cross platform already), I tought it may be possible and wanted advices. I would love that every single customer switch to Linux and Ubuntu tomorrow morning but at the moment, that's not the case. Thanks. Le 2013-12-04 11:31, Patrick Lists a écrit : Probably feeding the trolls but here it goes. On 12/04/2013 04:19 PM, CDR wrote: Digium is 100% lost in the map. If they would come up with a Paid version of Asterisk, one that would use the .NET framework in Windows, something simple to install, they could go public on the product. IIRC Microsoft no longer invests in the .Net framework which makes it a bad idea for a product that would live for up to 10 years. Do you really want to bet your business/company that .Net will be there in 5 to 10 years? Linux has a very steep learning curve. A Windows application that would do exactly the same would be a home run. I find Linux easier than Windows. Installing a package on Linux or Windows is not the issue. How is a simple 'yum install asterisk' any more difficult than double clicking on it in Windows? It's what you do afterwards with the OS and package. Asterisk has a much steeper learning curve than either. It's easy to mess up the config and suffer the consequences if the box is Internet facing. Also, Windows has a terrible reputation when it comes to security. Why would anyone want to use Windows for an Internet facing service? There's a reason that Google, Facebook, Twitter and pretty much the rest of the world are powered by Linux and it's not only because it's cheaper. Just because you find Windows easier does not make it a good idea. Note: I am a Linux expert user, but it took me years to get here. And still, moving from regular RHEL 6.0 to Fedora 20 (RHEL 7) is a pain in the neck. There is probably a saying about people calling themselves experts and then complain about a move from EL6 to F20 which is puzzling by itself. The .NET framework and Windows server 2012 are miles away in terms of friendliness and on equal footing on performance. I have yet to see a large Telco or ITSP deploy their services on Windows. A while back I have seen some attempts. It was hilarious to hear that the servers had to be restarted every few hours. Performance totally sucked, components would crash and the solution was, even by telco standards, ridiculously expensive. So no, they are not on equal footing when it comes to performance (and other aspects). I don´t mean another slow cygwin port, I man a native Asterisk for windows. In fact, I would invest on the project if somebody wants to do it. If you really want to use Windows then have a look at FreeSWITCH as it's available on Windows too. Then there is also Lync and 3CX. Good luck keeping your Windows boxes from getting hacked with all the financial and other damage it would cause. Regards, Patrick -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI-Linux and DAHDI-Tools 2.8.0-rc5 Now Available
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Tech Support aster...@voipbusiness.us wrote: Is there a general timeframe for when you think a stable 2.8.0 release will be available? v2.8.0 will probably be released within a week. There is a bit more churn on this release cycle due to: * Accommodating all stakeholders * Circumstances outside of our control (centos 6.5 kernel backporting) * Me mis-tagging a couple releases :-P The dahdi project development philosophy is to strive to keep the master branch and tagged releases stable and production ready. This includes the release candidates. -- Russ Meyerriecks Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA direct: +1 256-428-6025 Check us out at: www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Jetway, Atom, and Digium cards - play well together?
Hello Rodrigo, Wednesday, December 4, 2013, 9:55:44 AM, you wrote: I'd like to know from other people's experience using Asterisk and Digium cards like the TDM410P and B410P on Atom system (.e. giwth D525 CPU) and Jetway motherboards. Any operational instability, unexpected freezes, etc or in your experience it's a stable combination? I purchased an Intel BOXD945GCLF2D in June 2009 and it's been running the phone system and Samba since then. It uses a TDM-04 to handle 2 POTS lines and SIP for everything else. The system is extremly small, but it has always worked perfectly except for the day the power supply dies. It's not Jetway, but it is Atom. -- Ira-- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Jetway, Atom, and Digium cards - play well together?
We use Atoms with SSDs for customers and they work well We have a some with PCI on the motherboards and haven’t had any issue other than a single issue where a reinstall of the OS cleared up poor ethernet performance. Use almost no power, and with SSDs can almost avoid fans and thus moving parts. They are not Jetway motherboards but have used the D525 a lot. Just avoid this ethernet controller: Intel 82574L Gigabit controller http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html Cheers Duncan On 5/12/2013, at 5:40 pm, Ira i...@extrasensory.com wrote: Hello Rodrigo, Wednesday, December 4, 2013, 9:55:44 AM, you wrote: I'd like to know from other people's experience using Asterisk and Digium cards like the TDM410P and B410P on Atom system (.e. giwth D525 CPU) and Jetway motherboards. Any operational instability, unexpected freezes, etc or in your experience it's a stable combination? I purchased an Intel BOXD945GCLF2D in June 2009 and it's been running the phone system and Samba since then. It uses a TDM-04 to handle 2 POTS lines and SIP for everything else. The system is extremly small, but it has always worked perfectly except for the day the power supply dies. It's not Jetway, but it is Atom. -- Ira -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
