Re: [asterisk-users] Wrong patch 1.8.26.1 at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/asterisk-1.8.26.1-patch.gz ?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Administrator TOOTAI ad...@tootai.net wrote: Hi, I have patch failure trying to apply asterisk-1.8.26.1-patch.gz I took a look in the patch and found those lines at the begining: --- asterisk-1.8.16.0-summary.txt (.../1.8.16.0) (revision 410440) +++ asterisk-1.8.16.0-summary.txt (.../1.8.26.1) (revision 410440) @@ -1,221 +0,0 @@ -Release Summary - - asterisk-1.8.16.0 - -Date: 2012-09-13 - - asteriskt...@digium.com This doesn't seems OK to me ... -- Daniel Hi Daniel: Thanks for catching that. I took a look at the release and the tarball itself was made properly; however, the patch file was generated incorrectly. The patch did still apply the security fix, but since it was generated against a much older version, it would have been difficult to apply to 1.8.26.0. I've updated the patch on the downloads site such that it is now a patch against 1.8.26.0. Let me know if you have any other issues. Thanks - Matt -- Matthew Jordan Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] SIPAddHeader back to source
Hi, I am using the XML-browser and Call-Info header features for some SIP phones. SIPAddHeader(Call-Info: ...) seems to work only in the outgoing direction. Does somebody know a way to send a Call-Info header to the originating SIP device by using only the dial plan? Currently, I am using the XML-browsers to update callee info, but I'd like to use the icon purpose to do that. It's probably easier to embed this functionality into a CTI application using an AMI command like Originate (such that internally Dial() gets called twice), but this triggers it from the outside. sipsak could be called from extensions.conf, but I'd like to avoid that. Transferring to a Local channel after entering the dial plan might also work, but that looks clumsy. I am sorry if I have overlooked a standard method to send a header back to the source. jg -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1
In a multi-tenant environment, we are sending various CallerIDs outbound from asterisk based on who the user is. We have an insurance agency who would like to present a toll free callerid. This works.. unless they're calling a toll free number. In that case, occasionally, the call fails. However, should we send a correctly formatted npanxx of a local number, the call completes. We have been advised that we can send the billing telephone number as a separate header and the call will complete, all-the-while, presenting the toll free number as the caller id. Does anyone know of the correct header required to provide this functionality? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1
Often it is P-Asserted-ID, but depends on the carrier. You should be asking your carrier how to do this. Be careful, if the carrier doesn't like your CID spoofing they might bill the call to a default number on the account. I suspect it is the destination which is rejecting the call because toll free numbers are not considered valid, not your carrier rejecting the call. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Positively Optimistic Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1 In a multi-tenant environment, we are sending various CallerIDs outbound from asterisk based on who the user is. We have an insurance agency who would like to present a toll free callerid. This works.. unless they're calling a toll free number. In that case, occasionally, the call fails. However, should we send a correctly formatted npanxx of a local number, the call completes. We have been advised that we can send the billing telephone number as a separate header and the call will complete, all-the-while, presenting the toll free number as the caller id. Does anyone know of the correct header required to provide this functionality? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1
On 03/17/2014 01:56 PM, Eric Wieling wrote: Often it is P-Asserted-ID, but depends on the carrier. You should be asking your carrier how to do this. Be careful, if the carrier doesn't like your CID spoofing they might bill the call to a default number on the account. Speaking as a carrier that allows this, we require the P-Asserted-Identity field. This is the example of a header that we insert with our SBC: P-Asserted-Identity: sip:2325551212@1.2.3.4 The phone number is the identifying marker to tell our Metaswitch the needed information to associate the call to the correct object for billing and call restriction purposes. The IP is the internal IP of our Metaswitch. It is the internal IP due to our MetaSwitch being behind our kamailio SBC. I suspect it is the destination which is rejecting the call because toll free numbers are not considered valid, not your carrier rejecting the call. As a carrier, I have never seen a case where a call (inbound or outbound) was rejected because the received caller ID string contained a toll free number. For me, as long as it passes the number validation step, we are good. And a toll free number looks like any other NAMPA number. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Positively Optimistic Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1 In a multi-tenant environment, we are sending various CallerIDs outbound from asterisk based on who the user is. We have an insurance agency who would like to present a toll free callerid. This works.. unless they're calling a toll free number. In that case, occasionally, the call fails. However, should we send a correctly formatted npanxx of a local number, the call completes. We have been advised that we can send the billing telephone number as a separate header and the call will complete, all-the-while, presenting the toll free number as the caller id. Does anyone know of the correct header required to provide this functionality? -- Jim Lucas http://www.cmsws.com/ http://www.cmsws.com/examples/ -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Wrong patch 1.8.26.1 at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/asterisk-1.8.26.1-patch.gz ?
Le 17/03/2014 15:57, Matthew Jordan a écrit : On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Administrator TOOTAI ad...@tootai.net wrote: Hi, I have patch failure trying to apply asterisk-1.8.26.1-patch.gz I took a look in the patch and found those lines at the begining: --- asterisk-1.8.16.0-summary.txt (.../1.8.16.0) (revision 410440) +++ asterisk-1.8.16.0-summary.txt (.../1.8.26.1) (revision 410440) @@ -1,221 +0,0 @@ -Release Summary - - asterisk-1.8.16.0 - -Date: 2012-09-13 - - asteriskt...@digium.com This doesn't seems OK to me ... -- Daniel [...] I've updated the patch on the downloads site such that it is now a patch against 1.8.26.0. Let me know if you have any other issues. Hi Matthew, patch applied perfectly, thanks. -- Daniel -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1
Gateway computers rejects calls like this. I was informed that their carrier rejects the calls because they cannot accurately bill. It seems pretty silly with voip and number portability. Thanks, Steve T On Mar 17, 2014 5:19 PM, Eric Wieling ewiel...@nyigc.com wrote: Often it is P-Asserted-ID, but depends on the carrier. You should be asking your carrier how to do this. Be careful, if the carrier doesn't like your CID spoofing they might bill the call to a default number on the account. I suspect it is the destination which is rejecting the call because toll free numbers are not considered valid, not your carrier rejecting the call. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Positively Optimistic Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Billing number vs. CallerID number | Asterisk 11.5.1 In a multi-tenant environment, we are sending various CallerIDs outbound from asterisk based on who the user is. We have an insurance agency who would like to present a toll free callerid. This works.. unless they're calling a toll free number. In that case, occasionally, the call fails. However, should we send a correctly formatted npanxx of a local number, the call completes. We have been advised that we can send the billing telephone number as a separate header and the call will complete, all-the-while, presenting the toll free number as the caller id. Does anyone know of the correct header required to provide this functionality? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users